First Prev
of 3
Next Last
Phoenix

Humble, TX

#49 Apr 20, 2013
Melody88 wrote:
<quoted text>This is what you whites are good at, revising history. This is why you pigs are already revising the facts that these pale white terrorist are Arabs, lol. Dumb delusional nuts
I hope you realize that 88 is what white nationalists use too.

“I'm a proud grandma”

Level 7

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

#51 Apr 21, 2013
Sinajuavi wrote:
<quoted text>
WMD? By whom? The Mongols used WMD, biological weapons, in fact, catapulting plague-dead cadavers over the city walls to infect the defending army and population.
Technology did not allow for nuclear-sized explosives until modern times. But biological warfare was used. All Empire engaged in an arms race. Horses, chariots, better infantry deployment, better sword metal, seige machinery, on and on it goes among all kinds of people.
Modern WMD, like poison gas, I think is blamed on the Germans, but I'd have to look that up.
Aren't the Mongols and the Germans part Neanderthal?

Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#52 Apr 21, 2013
Mint cookies wrote:
<quoted text>Ewwww no they raped us.... they are so hideous no one wants cave dweller
In fact that is likely. The neandertalensis DNA in Eurasians is entirely male.

Keep in mind, however, that sapiens also often lived in caves. In Israel there are caves with alternating residence of neandertalensis and sapiens.

Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#53 Apr 21, 2013
Ms Mack wrote:
<quoted text>
Aren't the Mongols and the Germans part Neanderthal?
All Eurasians are mixed with neandertalensis, and some with denisova. W-Central Africans are mixed with Homo heidelbergensis.

The only pure sapiens probably are northeast Africans.

Neandertalensis should not be seen as more violent than sapiens necessarily. There is no evidence for it.

the Iceman Inheritance is 100% bulldooky. Based on no science.

If neandertalensis genes had made sapiens more violent, this would be true of all Eurasians then, from australoids to khmer to Siberians to Semites to Europeans.

African heidelbergensis ancestor:
http://www.escuelapedia.com/wp-content/upload...

You should also keep in mind that as an Afro-whitey Yank you are also part neandertalensis, hence 3 species in 1.

Don't feel bad, I'm also likely a mix of 3 species. Yet I have no urges to eat raw meat or walk on all fours.

“100%”

Level 8

Since: Jan 10

United States

#54 Apr 21, 2013
If Humans can inherit higher intelligence from simply mixing, why would Humans need to evolve?? How many chromosomes did Neanderthals have?? If they had more or less chromosomes than Humans, their offsprings would have some kinda defects.

Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#56 Apr 21, 2013
Redefined wrote:
If Humans can inherit higher intelligence from simply mixing, why would Humans need to evolve?? How many chromosomes did Neanderthals have?? If they had more or less chromosomes than Humans, their offsprings would have some kinda defects.
Same number of chromosomes. They are not very far from sapiens, nor was heidelbergensis or denisova.

But you are correct that humans evolved higher intelligence gradually and apparently constantly over some 2.3 million years, since Homo first evolved from Australopithecus sediba.

“100%”

Level 8

Since: Jan 10

United States

#58 Apr 21, 2013
I laugh at Nigguhs wrote:
<quoted text>
That's because, you dumb Negro, because we know more about Neanderthals now smdh
We know they built the first homes, made the first bow, arrows and projectile spears, made the first clothing, had the first rituals and beliefs, were stronger than any human or Negro alive today, they were also longer lived than we have been so far.
Fact is, mah Nigguh, that all the people in the world that have achieved modern advances have ALL had Neanderthal DNA.
Whereas the world's dumbest and least achieving 'people' didn't, and that's you sub-Saharan savages.
Oh and by the way, you've got DNA from an even older proto-human, Homo Heidelbergensis LMFWAO
What about the Asians who still live the same way they did thousands of years ago yet have Neanderthal DNA?? If Humans inherited intelligence from mixing, why should we believe Humans evolved?? I bet you can't answer either question, lol

“100%”

Level 8

Since: Jan 10

United States

#59 Apr 21, 2013
I laugh at Nigguhs wrote:
<quoted text>
Stupid statement, evolution was also going on as well, it always will, but it's not a question of life 'choosing' to evolve or not.
Every human genome, and there are over 7 billion of them now, is different and is mutating daily somewhere, but many of the billions of possible mutations are in what is termed 'junk' DNA, so they will never present themselves in the population as a physical or physiological trait.
Mutations are what took slime somewhere on Earth to where we are today, you, me the trees, mold, grass, ducks and even starfish are all related, we share the same ancestor if we go back in time long enough.
It's all theory because if one can simply advance from mixing, there would be no need to evolve, period.
Sean Coonery

UK

#60 Apr 21, 2013
the typical Neanderthal was BRIGHTER than the modern negro.

“100%”

Level 8

Since: Jan 10

United States

#61 Apr 21, 2013
Sinajuavi wrote:
<quoted text>
Same number of chromosomes. They are not very far from sapiens, nor was heidelbergensis or denisova.
But you are correct that humans evolved higher intelligence gradually and apparently constantly over some 2.3 million years, since Homo first evolved from Australopithecus sediba.
If they had the same amount of chromosomes, why do scientists separate them from Humans??

Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#62 Apr 21, 2013
I laugh at Nigguhs wrote:
<quoted text>
That's because, you dumb Negro, because we know more about Neanderthals now smdh
We know they built the first homes, made the first bow, arrows and projectile spears, made the first clothing, had the first rituals and beliefs, were stronger than any human or Negro alive today, they were also longer lived than we have been so far.
Fact is, mah Nigguh, that all the people in the world that have achieved modern advances have ALL had Neanderthal DNA.
Whereas the world's dumbest and least achieving 'people' didn't, and that's you sub-Saharan savages.
Oh and by the way, you've got DNA from an even older proto-human, Homo Heidelbergensis LMFWAO
You do not understand anthropology, in addition to which you are a racist, therefore subhuman scum.

Egyptian civilization was created by black folks, ok. Start there with what an idiot you are. No achieving? Africans went through the same social and cultural developments we see everywhere.

Homo heidelbergensis with which W-Central Africans are mixed was a very late form of that species, and we do not know what he looked like. Very well could have had a brain as large as neandertalensis. The brain size of heidelbergensis had been steadily increasing. H. sapiens split from heidelbergensis 200,000 years ago. So heidelbergensis at that point had brains equal to sapiens.

Therefore your attempt to insult “Negros” by pointing out heidelbergensis ancestry doesn't work, any more than black racists make sense when insulting Eurasians for being part neandertalensis.

See how stupid you racists are? Now go slit your wrists.

http://www.iesabastos.org/archivos/daniel_tom...

http://www.escuelapedia.com/wp-content/upload...
Kai

Bristol, UK

#63 Apr 21, 2013
American education is not even in the top 10, if the black people in the UK outdo whites in the UK who are higher up the list than the US that means they outdo them in the US. US whites horde all the good shyte for themselves but even the Asians outdo them, the black people in the US many have lost what's important, but US whites shouldn't toot their dumb horn so much.
Kai

Bristol, UK

#64 Apr 21, 2013
Also white people are showing themselves to be a bunch of bombing killing spree peodo maniacs so when they go around saying bp are not human blah blah blah given all their high profile criminal actions recently it just falls on deaf ears and makes you look desperate and stupid.

“100%”

Level 8

Since: Jan 10

United States

#65 Apr 21, 2013
Sinajuavi wrote:
<quoted text>
You do not understand anthropology, in addition to which you are a racist, therefore subhuman scum.
Egyptian civilization was created by black folks, ok. Start there with what an idiot you are. No achieving? Africans went through the same social and cultural developments we see everywhere.
Homo heidelbergensis with which W-Central Africans are mixed was a very late form of that species, and we do not know what he looked like. Very well could have had a brain as large as neandertalensis. The brain size of heidelbergensis had been steadily increasing. H. sapiens split from heidelbergensis 200,000 years ago. So heidelbergensis at that point had brains equal to sapiens.
Therefore your attempt to insult “Negros” by pointing out heidelbergensis ancestry doesn't work, any more than black racists make sense when insulting Eurasians for being part neandertalensis.
See how stupid you racists are? Now go slit your wrists.
http://www.iesabastos.org/archivos/daniel_tom...
http://www.escuelapedia.com/wp-content/upload...
No one believe Central-West Africans have heidelbergensis DNA. I like how you continue bringing this up as if repeating this over & over again will make it believable, lol It's obvious you want too dilute West-Central Africans because that is ur origins.

Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#69 Apr 21, 2013
I laugh at Nigguhs wrote:
<quoted text>
Stupid statement, evolution was also going on as well, it always will, but it's not a question of life 'choosing' to evolve or not.
Every human genome, and there are over 7 billion of them now, is different and is mutating daily somewhere, but many of the billions of possible mutations are in what is termed 'junk' DNA, so they will never present themselves in the population as a physical or physiological trait.
Mutations are what took slime somewhere on Earth to where we are today, you, me the trees, mold, grass, ducks and even starfish are all related, we share the same ancestor if we go back in time long enough.
What are you babbling about. Your contention was that neanderalensis genes made Eurasians smarter. And that is BS. The point is that first we see no evidence of this, that we find the full panoply of human qualities whether in Africa, Eurasia or wherever.

Homo had been increasing in brain size for 3.2 million years. We see this throughout the time span of erectus, 1.9-.8 million years ago, the later the fossil, the larger the brain. Likewise with heidelbergensis, the brain keeps getting larger.

For denisova and heidelbergensis we do not have the fossils of those late ones who interbred with sapiens. But we know that neandertalensis had a larger brain than sapiens. And so for all we know, so did the other two species, denisova in eastern Eurasia, heidelbergensis in W.-Central Africa.

Your attempt to use anthropological information to sustain your idiotic and pathological RACISM has failed, boy. So stuff it.

Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#70 Apr 21, 2013
Kai wrote:
American education is not even in the top 10, if the black people in the UK outdo whites in the UK who are higher up the list than the US that means they outdo them in the US. US whites horde all the good shyte for themselves but even the Asians outdo them, the black people in the US many have lost what's important, but US whites shouldn't toot their dumb horn so much.
Yanks are myopic and xenophobic.

We're Number One!!!

Except of course, we're LAST on social welfare indices among all developed nations. We're in fact an unevolved society which has been surpassed by all those nations, from Germany to Japan to Israel to New Zealand.

but somehow we're better, because those Europeans are socialists, and everyone else is even more foreign than that!!!

A very dumbed-down society.
yea

Norwalk, CT

#72 Apr 22, 2013
Melody88 wrote:
<quoted text>
Its funny how some of you swines are so desperate that you change your usernames to pretend there are more of you when it isn't the case. This is just sad and pathetic. Having multiple usernames to support (like pathetic cheerleaders) racist pigs like yourself in a African Forum of all places makes me wonder if you have a fetish for black people?
and the more dead kneeggers the better
Barros Serrano

Albuquerque, NM

#73 Apr 22, 2013
yea wrote:
<quoted text> and the more dead kneeggers the better
You really should come and repeat your sociopathic racism in my presence, boy. I'll give you a free attitude adjustment.
yea

Norwalk, CT

#74 Apr 22, 2013
Barros Serrano wrote:
<quoted text>
You really should come and repeat your sociopathic racism in my presence, boy. I'll give you a free attitude adjustment.
good luck kneegger

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min Grey Ghost 1,172,887
Hebrew Israelite (Feb '11) 3 min Ben YISRAEL 104,193
Martin Luther King Jr. Would Have Opposed Gay M... 6 min Fa-Foxy 8
Why are Black Guys always hitting on me? 6 min Jax 2
China, the next Europeans/ colonizers 8 min Jax 6
Black Nubians Were The Original Egyptians 20 min Don Barros Serrano 305
Ten Reasons Why Black Men Prefer White Women! 24 min Savant 139
Name something POSITIVE about black people. 2 hr Zombie Corpse Rental 327
BM is mad b/c white girls don't like him. 2 hr Mick 409
I need proof that the Ancient Egyptians Were No... (Oct '07) 2 hr IMHOTEP 28,507
Did Africans REALLY sell other blacks into slav... 3 hr Kenyanboy 168
More from around the web