“me! chee hoo! LOL!”

Level 6

Since: Oct 09

Apia, Samoa

#63 Jan 16, 2013
Heres a evalulie always make me laugh.. A frog turning into a whale lol how many years lol.. Mate the earth is trillons not billons years old.. Do da math

“100%”

Level 8

Since: Jan 10

Orlando, FL

#64 Jan 16, 2013
Bigsmoke wrote:
<quoted text>
For the last time:
EVOLUTION is the change of allele frequencies in a gene pool. Nothing more, nothing less.
Reality doesn't care for your opinion. You can't twist or spin it sorry.
Try to understand the basics which is what ''evolution'' means in biology.
What are you talking about? Sapiens do not descend from Neanderthals nor do Neanderthals descend from Sapiens. No changes within Sapiens is comparable to that which makes both Sapiens and Neanderthals distinct from their Heidelbergensis ancestors.
You fail to have a point here.
It's NOT my opinion since Neanderthal Man & Sapiens is an example of Evolution.
Bigsmoke

London, UK

#65 Jan 16, 2013
Samoan Irish wrote:
<quoted text>and no missing links 2 back ur argument.. Ha ha ha ha.. Even evalulies will tell u dat.. Oh.. Look lets put this dog bone and add it with a cat bone..
Missing links of what?

“100%”

Level 8

Since: Jan 10

Orlando, FL

#66 Jan 16, 2013
Samoan Irish wrote:
<quoted text>intresting.. Thing is u cant grow apples rice or oranges in samoa...
I see....
Bigsmoke

London, UK

#67 Jan 16, 2013
Redefined wrote:
<quoted text>
It's NOT my opinion since Neanderthal Man & Sapiens is an example of Evolution.
So is two people having a child. The child gains new mutations; evolution. Hence why it's said that every living organism is continually evolving through the generations. Two sexes producing offspring is what drives evolution as it allows ''chance''.

Your point?

LOL, do you think in your head some monkey gave birth to a human or something?

*smh*
Bigsmoke

London, UK

#68 Jan 16, 2013
@ Redefined

It is said every generation gains around 60 new mutations. Having said that I know this is not accurate but you can get an idea of the differences I calculated (60 mutations per generation) in regards to different amounts of mutations on has over the other:

You vs Parents = 60 mutations
African vs European = 300,000 mutations
Neanderthal vs Sapien = 1,200,000 mutations
Human vs Chimpanzee = 24,000,000 mutations

If Africans and Europeans remained isolated from each other for 300,000+ years they probably would of evolved into separate species. But that didn't happen.

“100%”

Level 8

Since: Jan 10

Orlando, FL

#69 Jan 16, 2013
Bigsmoke wrote:
<quoted text>
So is two people having a child. The child gains new mutations; evolution. Hence why it's said that every living organism is continually evolving through the generations. Two sexes producing offspring is what drives evolution as it allows ''chance''.
Your point?
LOL, do you think in your head some monkey gave birth to a human or something?
*smh*
Changes also affecting 'abilities' which can be seen within' specie Evolution along with allele frequencies thus you have too include primitive & non primitive characteristics.
Bigsmoke

London, UK

#70 Jan 16, 2013
Redefined wrote:
<quoted text>
Changes also affecting 'abilities' which can be seen within' specie Evolution along with allele frequencies thus you have too include primitive & non primitive characteristics.
What are you talking about? I did not bring up ''primitive & non primitive'' anything.

Parents vs child, humans vs flower, swine flu vs bird flu; all due to evolution.

“100%”

Level 8

Since: Jan 10

Orlando, FL

#71 Jan 16, 2013
Bigsmoke wrote:
<quoted text>
What are you talking about? I did not bring up ''primitive & non primitive'' anything.
Parents vs child, humans vs flower, swine flu vs bird flu; all due to evolution.
Primitive & non Primitive characteristics are what scientists themselves describe within' specie Evolution.
Barros Serrano

Reserve, NM

#72 Jan 16, 2013
Redefined wrote:
<quoted text>
It's NOT my opinion since Neanderthal Man & Sapiens is an example of Evolution.
Any species extant or extinct is an example of evolution, fool. So what are you saying? NOTHING!

Stop babbing nonsense which clearly reveals you know nothing of the topic, and do as I said, go read an Intro to Physical Anthro text, the sort of text from which I have taught Intro to Physical Anthro. So far, you've failed, because you have not even attempted to learn the basic facts and concepts pertinent to evolutionary theory. You just babble nonsense and think you're upholding some ideological point. You are holding up nothing but evidence of your empty skull.

Read a goddam book first!
Barros Serrano

Reserve, NM

#73 Jan 16, 2013
Redefined wrote:
<quoted text>
Changes also affecting 'abilities' which can be seen within' specie Evolution along with allele frequencies thus you have too include primitive & non primitive characteristics.
Do you understand what “primitive” means? Not inferior or less complex... it means the older, the ancestral, trait. So having five digits on your hands and feet is a primitive trait. This is an example of a primitive trait which is retained by primates, while ungulates and others have evolved what are called “derived” traits, though their ancestor also had five digits. But now a horse stands on one fingernail and has lost the other four digits. A cow has lost 3 digits.

And so, we are more primitive than horses and cows in that respect. Get it? We have still the five original grasping fingers and five toes.

The brain of Homo sapiens, on the other hand, is not primitive. It is a derived trait, obviously, as the ancestral brain (of other Homo species) is differently designed and usually smaller.

I could teach the entire course in here but you Afronazis would ignore half of it, since knowing the scientific TRUTH punks your racist culture-vulture attempts.

And so, the fact remains you are NOT a Moorish Hebrew Olmec Chinese Viking. Sorry.
Bigsmoke

London, UK

#74 Jan 16, 2013
Redefined wrote:
<quoted text>
Primitive & non Primitive characteristics are what scientists themselves describe within' specie Evolution.
You've yet to express your point.

“100%”

Level 8

Since: Jan 10

Orlando, FL

#75 Jan 16, 2013
Barros Serrano wrote:
<quoted text>
Any species extant or extinct is an example of evolution, fool. So what are you saying? NOTHING!
Stop babbing nonsense which clearly reveals you know nothing of the topic, and do as I said, go read an Intro to Physical Anthro text, the sort of text from which I have taught Intro to Physical Anthro. So far, you've failed, because you have not even attempted to learn the basic facts and concepts pertinent to evolutionary theory. You just babble nonsense and think you're upholding some ideological point. You are holding up nothing but evidence of your empty skull.
Read a goddam book first!
I really don't understand the issue with my statements. I'm using The Neanderthal Man & Sapiens as an example. Apparently you guys have an issue with how scientists themselves describe Evolution between species.

“100%”

Level 8

Since: Jan 10

Orlando, FL

#76 Jan 16, 2013
Barros Serrano wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you understand what “primitive” means? Not inferior or less complex... it means the older, the ancestral, trait. So having five digits on your hands and feet is a primitive trait. This is an example of a primitive trait which is retained by primates, while ungulates and others have evolved what are called “derived” traits, though their ancestor also had five digits. But now a horse stands on one fingernail and has lost the other four digits. A cow has lost 3 digits.
And so, we are more primitive than horses and cows in that respect. Get it? We have still the five original grasping fingers and five toes.
The brain of Homo sapiens, on the other hand, is not primitive. It is a derived trait, obviously, as the ancestral brain (of other Homo species) is differently designed and usually smaller.
I could teach the entire course in here but you Afronazis would ignore half of it, since knowing the scientific TRUTH punks your racist culture-vulture attempts.
And so, the fact remains you are NOT a Moorish Hebrew Olmec Chinese Viking. Sorry.
My description of 'Primitive' is based on how Neanderthal Man is described by scientists themselves. This is a word often used to describe Neanderthal Man lifestyle & their physical characteristics.

“100%”

Level 8

Since: Jan 10

Orlando, FL

#77 Jan 16, 2013
Bigsmoke wrote:
<quoted text>
You've yet to express your point.
I've been describing Evolution based on how scientists themselves describe it within' species. I dunno how to make this anymore clearer.

“me! chee hoo! LOL!”

Level 6

Since: Oct 09

Apia, Samoa

#79 Jan 16, 2013
Bigsmoke wrote:
<quoted text>
You've yet to express your point.
so havnt u.. Why do evalulies estimate the age of the earth.. Under ground.. Explain..
Bigsmoke

London, UK

#78 Jan 16, 2013
Redefined wrote:
<quoted text>
I've been describing Evolution based on how scientists themselves describe it within' species. I dunno how to make this anymore clearer.
No you keep changing your argument it seems.

You were arguing micro-evolution vs macro-evolution, then to the definition of evolution now what scientists describe evolution as being within a species.

“me! chee hoo! LOL!”

Level 6

Since: Oct 09

Apia, Samoa

#80 Jan 16, 2013
Heres how evalulies exploded, 1 lie after the other.. They couldnt find a missing link.. Made 1 up.. Java man.. Pig bones mixed with human.. He he

“100%”

Level 8

Since: Jan 10

Orlando, FL

#81 Jan 16, 2013
Bigsmoke wrote:
<quoted text>
No you keep changing your argument it seems.
You were arguing micro-evolution vs macro-evolution, then to the definition of evolution now what scientists describe evolution as being within a species.
I have never changed my argument. Go back & read my very 1st comment in this thread. My comment is based on how scientists themselves describe evolution within' species. You changed the argument because you disagreed. My argument has been consistent.
Bigsmoke

London, UK

#83 Jan 16, 2013
Samoan Irish wrote:
Heres how evalulies exploded, 1 lie after the other.. They couldnt find a missing link.. Made 1 up.. Java man.. Pig bones mixed with human.. He he
I clearly asked you ''Missing links of what?''. Why are you avoiding the question?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Hebrew Israelite (Feb '11) 3 min Undisputed Facts 116,446
What happened to Ashleigh ?? (Sep '14) 8 min ashleigh 7
Black Women Stop Befriending White Women 9 min ABM1977 64
Whites copied all great buildings from blacks 11 min Have a nice day 87
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 17 min Nuculur option 1,219,612
All women prefer white men 19 min iamcuriousnow 4,290
News White professors sue Alabama State for discrimi... 20 min Peterpan 8
the moors were black africans not arabs!!! (Jun '08) 21 min Don Barros Serrano 32,749
News 5 Reasons The American Dream Is Eluding Black P... 45 min Redefined 324
More from around the web