The Men's thread: For black men only!
jumpstart

United States

#1030 Apr 12, 2013
jumpstart wrote:
<quoted text> I think you typed I'm broke. temporarily unemployed or busted. by Busted I mean not in between jobs but down and out. if one is down and out it might be best not to date. that would be serviced motivation for dating getting a job. what else own cartoon ok not to be completely busted.
is crazy voice activation. what I was hoping to say was that anyone was completely flat busted should probably obtain gainful employment before pursuing another relationship. that way if any relationship in is the critical stage you have a little financial backup. thing is you can never tell when a relationship is going to get critical.
London

Memphis, TN

#1031 Apr 12, 2013
dragonpat wrote:
<quoted text>
OMG!!! lol!!!!
Thanks Dragon!

“Hating Gives You Wrinkles”

Level 6

Since: Mar 12

The Sequel

#1032 Apr 12, 2013
Desmond Sandiford wrote:
<quoted text>I agree with you that it's survival of the fittest. But if you look at history, the strongest don't stick around and build a family...they don't nurture and protect. What they do is, they take whatever the fk they want. So, if they see a woman, they take her and fk her and move on to the next one. it's about being completely ruthless and dominating others. That's the law of the jungle. in fact, it's been proven that men who stick around to raise kids and take care of a family tend to end up more domesticated with lower testosterone. In other words, by being an attentive, loving dad who spends time with his kids, you become LESS of what nature intended a man to be.
No you do not become LESS of what nature intended a man to be...yes it is true that married men have lower testosterone than men who are unmarried..when you hold a baby did you know your testosterone level immediately decreases? Your testosterone levels go down because it's your body's way of taking care of you..you don't need all of that testosterone when your married so your body produces less.. And married men love longer lives than single men because men benefit so much from marriage, in fact men benefit more from marriage than women and they are more healthy then single studies also show that married ppl with cancer have better chances of fighting cancer and live longer than cancer patients who are single..
London

Memphis, TN

#1033 Apr 12, 2013
jumpstart wrote:
<quoted text> I think you typed I'm broke. temporarily unemployed or busted. by Busted I mean not in between jobs but down and out. if one is down and out it might be best not to date. that would be serviced motivation for dating getting a job. what else own cartoon ok not to be completely busted.
Exactly! That's my point. And life is full of ups and downs. Very few of us maintain everything all of the time. But it's the broke mentality dudes who are the ones whining about women not wanting them when the truth is women have no more use for a broke mentality dude anymore than a man has use for a fat one. Women in general accept if they are fat they aren't going to get many offers but men can't accept the same type of standard.
London

Memphis, TN

#1034 Apr 12, 2013
__jaz__ wrote:
<quoted text>
No you do not become LESS of what nature intended a man to be...yes it is true that married men have lower testosterone than men who are unmarried..when you hold a baby did you know your testosterone level immediately decreases? Your testosterone levels go down because it's your body's way of taking care of you..you don't need all of that testosterone when your married so your body produces less.. And married men love longer lives than single men because men benefit so much from marriage, in fact men benefit more from marriage than women and they are more healthy then single studies also show that married ppl with cancer have better chances of fighting cancer and live longer than cancer patients who are single..
Des thinking is equivalent to a wild animal. That's why he talks about them so much.

Great post Jaz.

“Hating Gives You Wrinkles”

Level 6

Since: Mar 12

The Sequel

#1035 Apr 12, 2013
London wrote:
<quoted text>
Des thinking is equivalent to a wild animal. That's why he talks about them so much.
Great post Jaz.
Thanx..A man doesn't have to have constant high levels of testosterone to be a man.. ppl who are angry a lot have shorter lives and having very high levels of testosterone can make a male aggressive..
jumpstart

United States

#1036 Apr 12, 2013
London wrote:
<quoted text>
hehe. ummmm. they'd have to kill each other. lol.
please enlighten me.
plan is to get into a relationship. try to make sure that both parties have an equal amount to lose. the pig have to sacrifice is life. the chicken would only lose an egg. if you're in a relationship and putting in all the work it's costing you a lot more than the persons just putting in an egg symbolically. I have a relative who always wants to start a business with me. everytime we discuss finances he's broke. thus we can start a business. relationships are not businesses but if both sides suffer an equal loss when was soon at both sides would put in equal amounts of work. this doesn't mean splitting the tab. it means working toward a goal. so that we both make and if we don't make it be both lose. teamwork.

Level 8

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#1037 Apr 12, 2013
jumpstart wrote:
<quoted text> plan is to get into a relationship. try to make sure that both parties have an equal amount to lose. the pig have to sacrifice is life. the chicken would only lose an egg. if you're in a relationship and putting in all the work it's costing you a lot more than the persons just putting in an egg symbolically. I have a relative who always wants to start a business with me. everytime we discuss finances he's broke. thus we can start a business. relationships are not businesses but if both sides suffer an equal loss when was soon at both sides would put in equal amounts of work. this doesn't mean splitting the tab. it means working toward a goal. so that we both make and if we don't make it be both lose. teamwork.
the chicken is involved but the pig is committed. they tell this story a lot at leadership summits and planning groups.
jumpstart

United States

#1038 Apr 13, 2013
Desmond Sandiford wrote:
<quoted text>the chicken is involved but the pig is committed. they tell this story a lot at leadership summits and planning groups.
voila.
London

Powell, OH

#1040 Apr 13, 2013
jumpstart wrote:
<quoted text> plan is to get into a relationship. try to make sure that both parties have an equal amount to lose. the pig have to sacrifice is life. the chicken would only lose an egg. if you're in a relationship and putting in all the work it's costing you a lot more than the persons just putting in an egg symbolically. I have a relative who always wants to start a business with me. everytime we discuss finances he's broke. thus we can start a business. relationships are not businesses but if both sides suffer an equal loss when was soon at both sides would put in equal amounts of work. this doesn't mean splitting the tab. it means working toward a goal. so that we both make and if we don't make it be both lose. teamwork.
In a marriage and/or deep partnership, this is true. However, when dating, this isn't true. Just dating and meeting people isn't then cause to get caught up in there goals. It only means you must listen to them and hear about what they are going through to attain the goal but there is no other support the other person should expect.

Plus the agreement was for both to go in to the restaurant business in your example. It was the goal of both. Now if it's more the goal of one but not the other, and the other ignores this, well the person who ignored that the other person didn't really want the restaurant will get there karma because the one whose wants were ignored will not want to risk as much.,. In a committed relationship, you must consider your partner or why even bother having a partner.

That, to me, is the biggest lesson in your example. Lending support to our partners for there goal doesn't then mean they get to run us over and ignore our wants without a consequence to that.
jumpstart

United States

#1041 Apr 13, 2013
London wrote:
<quoted text>
In a marriage and/or deep partnership, this is true. However, when dating, this isn't true. Just dating and meeting people isn't then cause to get caught up in there goals. It only means you must listen to them and hear about what they are going through to attain the goal but there is no other support the other person should expect.
Plus the agreement was for both to go in to the restaurant business in your example. It was the goal of both. Now if it's more the goal of one but not the other, and the other ignores this, well the person who ignored that the other person didn't really want the restaurant will get there karma because the one whose wants were ignored will not want to risk as much.,. In a committed relationship, you must consider your partner or why even bother having a partner.
That, to me, is the biggest lesson in your example. Lending support to our partners for there goal doesn't then mean they get to run us over and ignore our wants without a consequence to that.
I was talking about something more serious. this your desire just to meet people can go ahead.. but you never know that's on you meet has something more serious in mind for you. you think that can you should have paid attention some minor detail the conversation. like a serious business we can have fun but remember it's always better to wear a seatbelt.
London

Powell, OH

#1042 Apr 13, 2013
jumpstart wrote:
<quoted text> I was talking about something more serious. this your desire just to meet people can go ahead.. but you never know that's on you meet has something more serious in mind for you. you think that can you should have paid attention some minor detail the conversation. like a serious business we can have fun but remember it's always better to wear a seatbelt.
Well even before something can get more serious, it starts off not so serious. No one owes us support for our goals other than lending a listening ear unless we have made the ultimate commitment to them. And even still in that situation, we must still consider the impact our goal will have on our family or we deservedly pay the price when we don't do this.

Now that's the message from your riddle.
London

Powell, OH

#1043 Apr 13, 2013
Desmond Sandiford wrote:
Back in the days of slavery, it was COMMON thing for white women, some of whom also had white men, to lay down with black men who were slaves. All them women weren't crazy...it's just that they understand that the WHOLE value of a man is a lot more than how much money he has.
I'm glad you admit that ww had just as much access to male slaves as wm had to female slaves. But that's the only truth you state in this post. Women don't see some dude in chains and shackles as a man. lol! Are you high? Those women saw those dudes just like you see your doorknob. They were an unfeeling, unthinking "it". They were just something to ride on like a mechanically bull except they could be made to talk and tell them they were beautiful. And just like female slaves, it was only low life type ww who even did that much. Most upper-class or dignified whites were not screwing blacks. Quit making excuses for the buffoonery called slavery.

Level 1

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#1044 Apr 13, 2013
London wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm glad you admit that ww had just as much access to male slaves as wm had to female slaves. But that's the only truth you state in this post. Women don't see some dude in chains and shackles as a man. lol! Are you high? Those women saw those dudes just like you see your doorknob. They were an unfeeling, unthinking "it". They were just something to ride on like a mechanically bull except they could be made to talk and tell them they were beautiful. And just like female slaves, it was only low life type ww who even did that much. Most upper-class or dignified whites were not screwing blacks. Quit making excuses for the buffoonery called slavery.
I was agreeing right until the end. Interracial sex (rape) was not limited to "low life type" whites. This actually committed more by wealthy whites because a lot of poor whites couldn't afford slaves. Take Thomas Jefferson for example, he went on to become president of the USA.
jumpstart

United States

#1045 Apr 13, 2013
London wrote:
<quoted text>
Well even before something can get more serious, it starts off not so serious. No one owes us support for our goals other than lending a listening ear unless we have made the ultimate commitment to them. And even still in that situation, we must still consider the impact our goal will have on our family or we deservedly pay the price when we don't do this.
Now that's the message from your riddle.
you always wear seatbelt with you driving for pleasure are driving to work. no one knows when the relationship is going to get serious. I might be thinking seriously me other person is not. does that make it less serious. back to the seatbelt analogy. just because your pleasure driving doesn't mean you shouldn't be buckled in. I'm not saying you let the person know right up front that you're interested or you're serious about them but you have to have a seriousness in you. you will give off a non-serious aura if you don't and probably will attract non serious people. people that are trifling and frivolous silly. that's okay too if that's what you want. but from personal experience I can take you to great waste of time. here you are waiting for them to get serious and the clock is ticking. and worse even what if you've already fallen for this person now you have to make them into an adult how long will that take could ever happens?
London

Powell, OH

#1046 Apr 13, 2013
DjinnDjinn wrote:
<quoted text>
I was agreeing right until the end. Interracial sex (rape) was not limited to "low life type" whites. This actually committed more by wealthy whites because a lot of poor whites couldn't afford slaves. Take Thomas Jefferson for example, he went on to become president of the USA.
Thomas Jefferson was the exception and not the rule. Blacks were victimized more from lower caste whites because they were the ones blacks dealt directly with the most. Whether lower caste whites had slaves or not still (and they did start acquiring slaves and even renting them) but whether they were slave owners or not they still had control over slaves due to white supremacy. And many of the lynchings etc were not by wealthy whites but in fact from lower whites.
London

Powell, OH

#1047 Apr 13, 2013
jumpstart wrote:
<quoted text>
you always wear seatbelt with you driving for pleasure are driving to work. no one knows when the relationship is going to get serious. I might be thinking seriously me other person is not. does that make it less serious. back to the seatbelt analogy. just because your pleasure driving doesn't mean you shouldn't be buckled in. I'm not saying you let the person know right up front that you're interested or you're serious about them but you have to have a seriousness in you. you will give off a non-serious aura if you don't and probably will attract non serious people. people that are trifling and frivolous silly. that's okay too if that's what you want. but from personal experience I can take you to great waste of time. here you are waiting for them to get serious and the clock is ticking. and worse even what if you've already fallen for this person now you have to make them into an adult how long will that take could ever happens?
I just don't believe dudes dating should look to women they are dating to accomplish their goals. That's all. Marriage and more serious type relationships are entirely different and even they can only go so far.
jumpstart

United States

#1048 Apr 13, 2013
London wrote:
<quoted text>
I just don't believe dudes dating should look to women they are dating to accomplish their goals. That's all. Marriage and more serious type relationships are entirely different and even they can only go so far.
we dated for how to get laid. relationship to the same. friendships turn into a smore serious things. some people remain friends. if I'm trying to reach your goals and you can help me as a friend don't think you gonna be my friend either. I don't need financial support could be moral support. I don't want a friend who doesn't have any goals and dreams. to quote someone. I would prefer an intelligent enemy 2 stupid friend. I don't like hanging around people that are going nowhere.

Level 8

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#1049 Apr 13, 2013
Joke time: What do you call a white millionaire phyicist?

Level 8

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#1050 Apr 13, 2013
Q: What do you call a 13 year old white girl from Kentucky who can run faster than her six brothers?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 min John Galt 1,382,894
Police Search for Serial Gang Rapist Described ... 1 min Hellywood 24
What is a white crime expert? 1 min Gremlin 8
Black Marine murdered Okinawan 4 min Hebrew Supremacist 3
more white men should become cuckold (Jul '14) 10 min the truth 50
Detectives called Trayvon a n****r, and a thug 10 min Gremlin 3
White men DO NOT want white girls who date blac... (Nov '10) 14 min the truth 5,383
Trump taking about deporting illegal immigrants 20 min Big Woody 58
the moors were black africans not arabs!!! (Jun '08) 24 min JOHNS ON TOP OF IT 44,805
Whites Are Not To Blame For Your Problems 1 hr BM Need To Listen... 75
Hebrew Israelite (Feb '11) 3 hr JOHNS ON TOP OF IT 134,199
More from around the web