Again you lie in the face of all evidence.<quoted text>
A few things here 1) you need not use the western "sub" term to describe Africa. There are no "2 Africa's". I speak with Africans all the time and they too are perplexed by the "sub" term. Fact is there are lots of Blacks in northern Africa since the beginning of time.
2) When we speak of ancient Kemet ( the real non-western name, if you will).......we can not look at the PPL. there today. The present-day, white Arab invaders have absolutely nothing to do with Kemet. Dr Muhammed Arabi below explains:
Already I've proven, using Keita as a source, that predynastic Lower Egypt included Eurasians.
Now, by your FAILURE to post ANY evidence for a non-Eurasian Maghreb for 30k years, you have established that I am right about the Maghreb also, that it has been predominantly Eurasian for 30k years.
Now, if you think blacks have been in the Maghreb since the beginning of time(LOL!!!) post evidence for Africans in the Maghreb between 30k and 20k bp.
You lose, liar.