I need proof that the Ancient Egyptia...
Gmoney

Woodbridge, VA

#16326 Apr 13, 2013
burrito crazy wrote:
<quoted text>.
How do you know europeans dont have a long recorded history as well?.Afrocentric disregard our history and say europe did not have any of its history.It "stole" of cultures which is ridiculous. Why is it the sings of the world are solely placed on the west.That is sheer ignorance.
I mean the chinese speak of us since 1500bc and possibly earlier. Im not asian culture specialist but clearly it has some merit.Afroasia IS A HUGE GREY area with many linguistic gaps that cannot be fully linked 100% from africa to asia. Their are many many gaps in between yet to be filled.Thats why they said proposed in many books.The asians or africans are not jumping up and down to prove what you are saying.Instead they are relying on western analysis .Mathematics is not western.Its numbers which exist all over the world.I am not discrediting african influence.I just do not know enough about it because 1)as you based on your race, its not a priority for me, your priority is understanding your identity and understanding african roots 2)they don't teach it because its relative to each society 3)should i learn about russian culture and society if i live in canada? how that make me understand whites better? it does not .Teaching 90+ country histories would simply mean you have to spend another 10 years in school.Which no offense but thats expensive.If you want to learn about culture like I DO .You learn on your own. I learn about all cultures when I have spare time so I can understand the human experience better
And that's where I am telling you that your wrong. I do however study African history and your wrong for saying that there aren't African scientist disproving western scientist so called studies of Africa. They aren't getting the publication opportunities and rights that western white society is getting. Also the fact that Europeans have stolen history from people is fact. The simple fact that in the 1800 to 1900's they have been portraying themselves as the people of Egypt, the people of the bible and as jesus himself as a white dirty blonde haired man. American history has told lies of Thanksgiving being a time of joy and about Christopher Colombus discovering land that already existed all to support your racist views. Why should anyone believe what you say to completion? Yea the Asians talk about Europeans. They talk about how they were filthy and disgusting. Barley bathed and brought disease and famine. They talk about how they wanted to exterminate your people because of it.(Portuguese) I know African history boy. I've attended the African poetry theater studies and Swahili classes on Jamaica avenue in New York so maybe before you speak of a people's history, you should read up and do some studying before talking.
Gmoney

Woodbridge, VA

#16327 Apr 13, 2013
And no one is discrediting Europeans at all. I stated myself in an earlier post the Europeans have done and made way for a number of things that can be accounted for but they do not have a hand in every aspect of the world. And in the same light everything the black man has a hand on is not evil. Your friend Barros claims that during the control of Spain, the black moors stopped the spaniards from flourishing and becoming a greater people when in fact Spain was flourishing under the black moors control while the rest of Europe were in the dark ages. The black moors taught math, architecture and bought many other cultural influences to Spain that still remain till this day. No one is taking European history from Europe. We are simply saying that African history plays a bigger role in history as whole than what people like to admit.

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#16328 Apr 14, 2013
Gaymoney wrote:
And no one is discrediting Europeans at all. I stated myself in an earlier post the Europeans have done and made way for a number of things that can be accounted for but they do not have a hand in every aspect of the world. And in the same light everything the black man has a hand on is not evil. Your friend Barros claims that during the control of Spain, the black moors stopped the spaniards from flourishing and becoming a greater people when in fact Spain was flourishing under the black moors control while the rest of Europe were in the dark ages. The black moors taught math, architecture and bought many other cultural influences to Spain that still remain till this day. No one is taking European history from Europe. We are simply saying that African history plays a bigger role in history as whole than what people like to admit.
Spain flourished? The Moors did, not the Spanish. The Moors were mostly Berbers. The scholars bringing those mostly Greek books in and translating them were Jews.

The Dark Ages, so-called, were caused by a combination of Christian backwardness since the Empire became Christian, and the Moorish blockade of the Western Mediterranean. Without the Moors there, those countries would have recovered quickly from having fallen to Germanic rule. The Moors perpetuated it for centuries.

You think your'e correcting some sort of historical bias, but your version is bullcrap. You've correected nothing, only caused more confusion.
Gmoney

Woodbridge, VA

#16329 Apr 14, 2013
Sinajuavi loves deep throating and being tea bagged wrote:
These Afronazis jump up and down pretending they're being attacked by fanatic KKK Eurocentric racists, but in fact most of the opposition to them in here is simply because they make outlandish claims that are NOT supported by evidence, and use the excuse that they're “misunderstood” because academia is Eurocentric! Yeah right.
Eurocentric academia discovered OOA migrations, origin of humans in Africa, as well as black Upper Egypt creating civilization. But Gaymoney and the rest of the group plus sockpuppets rave on about the white racists stealing their heritage. SMH...
Afroasiatic languages involve some half-dozen sub-families which are all distantly related, meaning they separated long ago. And they've spread out in various directions, obviously by migration. So, where did they originate? Ethiopia? Along the Nile? The Mideast?
To Afronazis this is a crucial matter, they MUST be of African origin. I personally don't CARE, in the sense of have any emotional involvement in the outcome. Whatever the evidence shows, good, we know more, we keep searching for more.
But, alas, Afronazis are racists. They are going to out-racist those nasty old dead Eurocentrics.
Sit down boy sit.... Your having a conversation with yourself because you obviously can't read people's post thoroughly. Time and time again I said Afroasiatic people exist and the language in which Afroasiatic linguistics represents has its origins in Africa and Asia. No one coming before the other as the language came from different types of Afroasiatic mixtures. Even in Ethiopia today you can see the Afroasiatic traits in the Oromo people, Amhara and the tigreans. Same with the Tigrinya and the Tigre people. And they all either speak Arabic, Semitic or Cushitic languages. East African has been a melting pot for the Middle East and Africa for thousands of years before Europeans came about and a lot of civilization that happened in Africa and western Asia came from these Afroasiatic people. So sit down boy, you know not what your talking about. You only wish we were worst than Eurocentrics so it can take some attention away from your Eurocentric scientific racism and your other KKK members that you support faggot.
Gmoney

Woodbridge, VA

#16330 Apr 14, 2013
Sinajuavi wrote:
<quoted text>
Spain flourished? The Moors did, not the Spanish. The Moors were mostly Berbers. The scholars bringing those mostly Greek books in and translating them were Jews.
The Dark Ages, so-called, were caused by a combination of Christian backwardness since the Empire became Christian, and the Moorish blockade of the Western Mediterranean. Without the Moors there, those countries would have recovered quickly from having fallen to Germanic rule. The Moors perpetuated it for centuries.
You think your'e correcting some sort of historical bias, but your version is bullcrap. You've correected nothing, only caused more confusion.
Oh whatever. The "dark ages was restricted to certain areas in Europe, Spain not being one of them. It was labeled the dark ages not because of Moors which by the way like Ethiopian is another word for black. They had there middle age because it was a period in which European culture, scholarly achievements and belief system diminished due to the fall of Rome which had nothing to do with the Moors. Europe wasn't even into architecture the way they were during the classical and renaissance period. The Moors had nothing to do with crippling Europes progress towards the renaissance and Christianity and its reformation of the church helped Europe through the renaissance period so what are you talking about? Europe used Christianity to kill, sack and rob Jerusalem which they have no rights to. A number of events brought Europe into the renaissance all which the European people were good at either turning a positive to a negative or making good use out of positive situations. Nevertheless the Moors did not stop this nor did they slow it down and while Europe was going through the dark ages Spain was free to express their cultural beliefs and learned how to build extravagant architecture out of precious material instead of that weak wood they were using. Other cultural values were brought to Spain that differs Spain greatly from the rest of Europe due to the Moors invasion.

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#16331 Apr 14, 2013
Gaymoney wrote:
<quoted text>
Sit down boy sit.... Your having a conversation with yourself because you obviously can't read people's post thoroughly. Time and time again I said Afroasiatic people exist and the language in which Afroasiatic linguistics represents has its origins in Africa and Asia. No one coming before the other as the language came from different types of Afroasiatic mixtures. Even in Ethiopia today you can see the Afroasiatic traits in the Oromo people, Amhara and the tigreans. Same with the Tigrinya and the Tigre people. And they all either speak Arabic, Semitic or Cushitic languages. East African has been a melting pot for the Middle East and Africa for thousands of years before Europeans came about and a lot of civilization that happened in Africa and western Asia came from these Afroasiatic people. So sit down boy, you know not what your talking about. You only wish we were worst than Eurocentrics so it can take some attention away from your Eurocentric scientific racism and your other KKK members that you support faggot.
You're babbling! It is not easy to even discern what you are saying. People mixed over time, Afroasiatic languages everywhere, yeah, that's fascinating but so what?

What is it I don't get about history, which you minimally understand but think you have a point to make???

Both Babylon and Egypt were Afroasiatic-speaking, is that what you're trying to tell us?

But look, a language group, based on some original language somewhere, can't develop in 2 places at once. It has to originate somewhere. Then as its speakers migrate around, it changes into new languages, absorbs bits from other languages.

So, yeah, lots of civilization and mixing and language, is that what you're saying?

What the hell do I believe that the KKK would share? Eurocentric scientific racism? I'm saying NOTHING racist. Science today is not racist. Science is very anti-racist in fact.

You don't know what the hell you're talking about, Gaymoney.

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#16332 Apr 14, 2013
Gaymoney wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh whatever. The "dark ages was restricted to certain areas in Europe, Spain not being one of them. It was labeled the dark ages not because of Moors which by the way like Ethiopian is another word for black. They had there middle age because it was a period in which European culture, scholarly achievements and belief system diminished due to the fall of Rome which had nothing to do with the Moors. Europe wasn't even into architecture the way they were during the classical and renaissance period. The Moors had nothing to do with crippling Europes progress towards the renaissance and Christianity and its reformation of the church helped Europe through the renaissance period so what are you talking about? Europe used Christianity to kill, sack and rob Jerusalem which they have no rights to. A number of events brought Europe into the renaissance all which the European people were good at either turning a positive to a negative or making good use out of positive situations. Nevertheless the Moors did not stop this nor did they slow it down and while Europe was going through the dark ages Spain was free to express their cultural beliefs and learned how to build extravagant architecture out of precious material instead of that weak wood they were using. Other cultural values were brought to Spain that differs Spain greatly from the rest of Europe due to the Moors invasion.
I'll correct your errors, as a favor, since I'm educated in these matters and you obviously are not.

1. Moor doesn't mean black. It is from a Phoenician word for Western.

2. The Dark Ages, so-called, were due primarily to 2 forces: the Christian Empire, and the interference by Muslims, meaning in the West, Moors. The “fall of Rome” didn't cause squat.

3. The Moors did contribute to the economic stagnation which kept things “dark”. Yes, they did. They controlled shipping in the Mediterranean. The West could barely make contact with Constantinople.

4. Neither Christians nor Muslims had any rights to Jerusalem. The Muslims behaved just as badly as the Crusaders, but over a wide area and for many more centuries.

5. The Moors could not interfere with the Renaissance because they had lost power. In 1492 they were expelled from their last stronghold in Spain. Venetians, Catalanes and other Europeans now could sail the Mediterranean without Moorish interference.

6. The character of Spain is due to the nature of Iberia and its people. It is not a function of Moors nor of Romans. However, Spain is not by itself qualitatively different from the rest of Europe. It is quite European.

And keep in mind through all this that when the Moors were pushed out of Spain, they returned to the place of their origin, mostly in Algeria and Morocco. There today live their descendants. They are not black. And those areas were not black before they invaded Spain. Most Moors in Iberia were non-black Berbers. This is proven. The blacks mostly showed up as almoravides or almohades, both fundy Islamicist pains in the ass.
Gmoney

Woodbridge, VA

#16334 Apr 14, 2013
Sinajuavi wrote:
<quoted text>
I'll correct your errors, as a favor, since I'm educated in these matters and you obviously are not.
1. Moor doesn't mean black. It is from a Phoenician word for Western.
2. The Dark Ages, so-called, were due primarily to 2 forces: the Christian Empire, and the interference by Muslims, meaning in the West, Moors. The “fall of Rome” didn't cause squat.
3. The Moors did contribute to the economic stagnation which kept things “dark”. Yes, they did. They controlled shipping in the Mediterranean. The West could barely make contact with Constantinople.
4. Neither Christians nor Muslims had any rights to Jerusalem. The Muslims behaved just as badly as the Crusaders, but over a wide area and for many more centuries.
5. The Moors could not interfere with the Renaissance because they had lost power. In 1492 they were expelled from their last stronghold in Spain. Venetians, Catalanes and other Europeans now could sail the Mediterranean without Moorish interference.
6. The character of Spain is due to the nature of Iberia and its people. It is not a function of Moors nor of Romans. However, Spain is not by itself qualitatively different from the rest of Europe. It is quite European.
And keep in mind through all this that when the Moors were pushed out of Spain, they returned to the place of their origin, mostly in Algeria and Morocco. There today live their descendants. They are not black. And those areas were not black before they invaded Spain. Most Moors in Iberia were non-black Berbers. This is proven. The blacks mostly showed up as almoravides or almohades, both fundy Islamicist pains in the ass.
Again let the white man tell it. Your about as educated as deer crossing a wide road.
Gmoney

Woodbridge, VA

#16335 Apr 14, 2013
Ancient Egyptian wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL There is the ole PAID Drunken Black Egyptian lol
They love that video...smh
It proves nothing but their ignorance.
SMH
Next!
Lol @paid. He has to be drunken because he's black? Wow racism gone wild. Show how ignorant you really are.
mudaliar india

Chennai, India

#16336 Apr 14, 2013
Ancient Egyptions are of DRAVIDIAN origin (Present day South Indian state of Tamil Nadu,Andhra Pradesh,Karnataka) a ancient mediterian race controlled vast area from medetranian to indian subcontinent. Ancient Sumerians do share common similiarities between present day TAMILS of india or Native people of India -Dravidians
Gmoney

Woodbridge, VA

#16339 Apr 14, 2013
In historical times, the Berbers expanded south into the Sahara (displacing earlier populations such as the Azer and Bafour), and have in turn been mainly culturally assimilated in much of North Africa by Arabs, particularly following the incursion of the Banu Hilal in the 11th century.--Wikipedia

Just as I have been saying these people were black. The Azer and the Bafour were black. These were the original berbers. Arabs started coming in during the early 7th and 8th century and during the 11th century the Arabs took over when Banu Hilal came. These are the same confederation of people that helped take over modern Egypt. These Arabs now practice African culture which is why they want to say they are natives of this land but are actually not. You guys need to get your facts straight.
burrito crazy

Toronto, Canada

#16340 Apr 14, 2013
Gmoney wrote:
<quoted text>
And that's where I am telling you that your wrong. I do however study African history and your wrong for saying that there aren't African scientist disproving western scientist so called studies of Africa. They aren't getting the publication opportunities and rights that western white society is getting. Also the fact that Europeans have stolen history from people is fact. The simple fact that in the 1800 to 1900's they have been portraying themselves as the people of Egypt, the people of the bible and as jesus himself as a white dirty blonde haired man. American history has told lies of Thanksgiving being a time of joy and about Christopher Colombus discovering land that already existed all to support your racist views. Why should anyone believe what you say to completion? Yea the Asians talk about Europeans. They talk about how they were filthy and disgusting. Barley bathed and brought disease and famine. They talk about how they wanted to exterminate your people because of it.(Portuguese) I know African history boy. I've attended the African poetry theater studies and Swahili classes on Jamaica avenue in New York so maybe before you speak of a people's history, you should read up and do some studying before talking.
if you have even read my posts in the past. I said id be interested in learning more about african culture and I have in some of my spare time.
You must have a one sided view of history.The portuguese actually assisted china in fighting off pirates in that time.They were then allowed to you what is now "macau" as a trading post back then.They also paid a annual rent to use the island of 500 lbs of silver a year to chinese government.It was said 2000 portuguese, 20000 chinese and 5000 slaves lived in macau.You really should read history better the portuguese were more diplomatic to the asians then a the british learn your history.The british has a treaty with the portuguese and the dutch and broke it several times.Its how the brits are.So please dont bother telling me you know what asians think, you are not asian.So you cannot assume.Sino-Portuguese relations have been very good for hundreds of years that is why it was not difficult for china to work with brazil.The chinese were even sometimes rude to the portuguese and yet they were still diplomatic about it.I am not saying they are saints , no culture is ,but you are generalizing all europeans bad.Iberia was succesful before the moors when their and mathematics was never exclusively black.it present in all cultures silly.The moors did not really add much themselves.It was inter-cultural interactions with jews and locals that created such prosperity in iberia.The prosperity of islam/moors was in iberia and persia.Because both of which had their own distinct culture prior to moors.Muslims stole persian sassinid empire mathematics,knowledge and claimed it as their own.
burrito crazy

Toronto, Canada

#16341 Apr 14, 2013
sorry 50lbs of silve typo*

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macau
Gmoney

Chesapeake, OH

#16342 Apr 14, 2013
burrito crazy wrote:
<quoted text>
if you have even read my posts in the past. I said id be interested in learning more about african culture and I have in some of my spare time.
You must have a one sided view of history.The portuguese actually assisted china in fighting off pirates in that time.They were then allowed to you what is now "macau" as a trading post back then.They also paid a annual rent to use the island of 500 lbs of silver a year to chinese government.It was said 2000 portuguese, 20000 chinese and 5000 slaves lived in macau.You really should read history better the portuguese were more diplomatic to the asians then a the british learn your history.The british has a treaty with the portuguese and the dutch and broke it several times.Its how the brits are.So please dont bother telling me you know what asians think, you are not asian.So you cannot assume.Sino-Portuguese relations have been very good for hundreds of years that is why it was not difficult for china to work with brazil.The chinese were even sometimes rude to the portuguese and yet they were still diplomatic about it.I am not saying they are saints , no culture is ,but you are generalizing all europeans bad.Iberia was succesful before the moors when their and mathematics was never exclusively black.it present in all cultures silly.The moors did not really add much themselves.It was inter-cultural interactions with jews and locals that created such prosperity in iberia.The prosperity of islam/moors was in iberia and persia.Because both of which had their own distinct culture prior to moors.Muslims stole persian sassinid empire mathematics,knowledge and claimed it as their own.
And you pretty much have said nothing in this post. Proven no point and even seem a little confused in your post. Look man you obviously haven't been paying attention to what i post because I don't put down Europeans as a whole at all. Nor do I put down All white Americans. This post was about were the ancient egyptians black. If you agree with them being black why are you here posting about other issues that have nothing to do with the main post. Which means your in hair to be negative about something and for what? I have no idea.
burrito crazy

Toronto, Canada

#16343 Apr 14, 2013
Gmoney wrote:
<quoted text>
And you pretty much have said nothing in this post. Proven no point and even seem a little confused in your post. Look man you obviously haven't been paying attention to what i post because I don't put down Europeans as a whole at all. Nor do I put down All white Americans. This post was about were the ancient egyptians black. If you agree with them being black why are you here posting about other issues that have nothing to do with the main post. Which means your in hair to be negative about something and for what? I have no idea.
Because your not any better then a backwards eurocentric. EUROPE just like AFRICA, is capable of discovering things in the realm of intellectual thought.To state the europeans simply were influenced by the moors.Is like saying the multi-racial make up of egyptian is what made it a "great civilization". I am sure the nubians did a lot for egpyt. I never thought they were white. I always saw them as their own people brown or black.NO BODY alive today can really say to someone 4000 years ago "hey whats up want to go to club"? we cannot because it was a different time.The only thing we can do is learn to be better people's because of the past that is all.My point is ignore the politics of people's views of saying its absolute and accept that each racial group is capable of many things. Mathematics was already alive in iberia and persia before the muzzies came in.That's my point.Nor would it be right for african's to claim persian culture. I guess what Im trying to say is I dont like double standards, for a moment a while back you exhibited some of it.But I have to quarrels with you.
Gmoney

Woodbridge, VA

#16344 Apr 14, 2013
burrito crazy wrote:
<quoted text>
Because your not any better then a backwards eurocentric. EUROPE just like AFRICA, is capable of discovering things in the realm of intellectual thought.To state the europeans simply were influenced by the moors.Is like saying the multi-racial make up of egyptian is what made it a "great civilization". I am sure the nubians did a lot for egpyt. I never thought they were white. I always saw them as their own people brown or black.NO BODY alive today can really say to someone 4000 years ago "hey whats up want to go to club"? we cannot because it was a different time.The only thing we can do is learn to be better people's because of the past that is all.My point is ignore the politics of people's views of saying its absolute and accept that each racial group is capable of many things. Mathematics was already alive in iberia and persia before the muzzies came in.That's my point.Nor would it be right for african's to claim persian culture. I guess what Im trying to say is I dont like double standards, for a moment a while back you exhibited some of it.But I have to quarrels with you.
Never posted any of the such. Never made claims that Europe didnt have its own greatness. Never made claims that the Moors influenced Europe. I said they influenced Spain as it is a place they conquered for quite some time. You talk but don't listen or rather dont really hear what your reading. As I said, Egyptians were black. Persians, black? Some tribes I believe were. Persia, Babylon was an area of different nations. Many different tribes lived in the area and they had their turn in ruling the land is what I believe. Ancient Berbers black? Yes indeed. Ancient Libyans black? Yes indeed. People of the bible being black and brown Afroasiatic people? Hell yea. Africa influencing other cultures like Native Americans? Yes sir. This is what I have been saying from the beginning and will continue to say.

Level 5

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#16345 Apr 16, 2013
mudaliar india wrote:
Ancient Egyptions are of DRAVIDIAN origin (Present day South Indian state of Tamil Nadu,Andhra Pradesh,Karnataka) a ancient mediterian race controlled vast area from medetranian to indian subcontinent. Ancient Sumerians do share common similiarities between present day TAMILS of india or Native people of India -Dravidians
No they were not.

Level 5

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#16346 Apr 16, 2013
Ancient Egyptian wrote:
<quoted text>
The Coptic Egyptians are the most pure of the Egyptian race, as they are not allowed to marry outside their culture. The Egyptian Race is referred to here by Herodotus:
After this man the priests enumerated to me from a papyrus roll the names of other kings, three hundred and thirty in number; and in all these generations of men eighteen were Ethiopians, one was a woman, a native Egyptian, and the rest were men and of Egyptian race: and the name of the woman who reigned was the same as that of the Babylonian queen, namely Nitocris.
Herodotus Histories II, 99f
Ethiopian refers to Black Africans, so there were some black Egyptians but as you can clearly see....A VERY SMALL MINORITY.
Here are Coptic Egyptians
http://cdn.3news.co.nz/3news/AM/2012/11/5/275...
http://images.christianpost.com/full/48282/eg...
http://www.thejakartapost.com/files/images2/E...
The truth is a mofo...isn't it? lol
Next!
ALL I SEE IS NAPPY HAIR

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#16347 Apr 16, 2013
Gaymoney 8th Grade Dropout wrote:
In historical times, the Berbers expanded south into the Sahara (displacing earlier populations such as the Azer and Bafour), and have in turn been mainly culturally assimilated in much of North Africa by Arabs, particularly following the incursion of the Banu Hilal in the 11th century.--Wikipedia
Just as I have been saying these people were black. The Azer and the Bafour were black. These were the original berbers. Arabs started coming in during the early 7th and 8th century and during the 11th century the Arabs took over when Banu Hilal came. These are the same confederation of people that helped take over modern Egypt. These Arabs now practice African culture which is why they want to say they are natives of this land but are actually not. You guys need to get your facts straight.
Wrong as always. The original Berbers were not black. They were Eurasians from the Maghreb. This is proven.

There is nothing you can do about all the DNA, human remains, ancient depictions, historical accounts, all of which confirm who the Berbers were and are. We already know this very well. So-called "Arabs" or real one in the Maghreb are not the ancient Berbers... those people are still there. They've been there for many milenia, before history.

You can't come in with an alternative story because the evidence sits there contradicting you at every turn.

Get an education before attempting to address these matters.
7New Earth7

Europe

#16349 Apr 17, 2013
Sinajuavi wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong as always. The original Berbers were not black. They were Eurasians from the Maghreb. This is proven.
There is nothing you can do about all the DNA, human remains, ancient depictions, historical accounts, all of which confirm who the Berbers were and are. We already know this very well. So-called "Arabs" or real one in the Maghreb are not the ancient Berbers... those people are still there. They've been there for many milenia, before history.
You can't come in with an alternative story because the evidence sits there contradicting you at every turn.
Get an education before attempting to address these matters.
You talking NORTHERN??? About the berbers, the
original inhabitants there were called derbers which is from the debay suffix in medebay. see an excerpt:
"The Derber dialects sunived (SURVIVED) both the
Phoenician aixl (AND) Roman occupation, and it wus (WAS) not till the third (X-cupation(OCCUPATION) by tlio (THE) Arab.o (ARABS) that the orif;inal(ORIGINAL) language may be said to liavo (HAVE) disiippoarod (DISAPPEARED)."

These three links are the links of the Medebays!!!!!!!!! Arabians are invaders!!!!!!!!

archive.org/stream/historyofromerom01duru#pag...

m.topix.com/forum/world/ethiopia/T4E44RURL5FJ...

www.google.com/m...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min Fitius T Bluster 1,709,690
White people GO AWAY 5 min Ihn 333
Troops, WE Can Save Commiefornia. 6 min Barros 17
Latinos are the best looking and have the best ... 7 min Ihn 2
Hispanics are part Black/African from the slave... 8 min Ihn 2
Colombians, Mexicans, Venezuelans, Guatemalans ... 8 min Ihn 3
Barros is BORRIS 😮 11 min Barros 15
What do you hate the most about Negroes? 1 hr Barros 31
Why are Negroes here in North America? 1 hr Barros 52
Smartest posters on Topix afam 2 hr Barros 172
More from around the web