Gmoney AKA Big G

Alexandria, VA

#26136 Aug 8, 2014
African AE wrote:
<quoted text>LOL well NEANDERTHALS were also female! Youre a gay fool in love with Barros!
Oh and you were referring to Neanderthal man when you were talking because your exact quote was that the sapien women couldn't keep their hands off of the SEXY Neanderthals..... Faag.
Gmoney AKA Big G

Alexandria, VA

#26137 Aug 8, 2014
African AE wrote:
<quoted text>Fact is, Egyptians kept records of all their Dynastys! If you look at the majority of murals, it shows people of different races! A lot of the sculptures do NOT look NGD**D at all!
There were white ancient Egyptians at the time of the pyramids:
5th Dynasty:
www.atlanteangardens.blogspot.com/2014/03/fac...
EGYPT WALL PAINTING showing WHITE EGYPTIANS:
www.superstock.com/stock-photos-images/1788-1...
So was ANCIENT EGYPT MULTI-RACIAL before they were invaded??? PROBABLY!
Modern Egyptians are OVERWHELMINGLY North Africa and Middle Eastern in origin
and dont look very different to other North Africans!
All of the sculptures of early Egyptian civilization are representative of black people. None of them display white characteristics so you're speaking about what you wish and not FACTS. They are not overwhelmingly anything but typical black Saharan people. Middle eastern in origin??? Are you not aware that Arabs invaded Egypt as well as Persians and many other central/western Asian groups of people? Shut up with your uneducated ass. Don't look very different to North Africans????? Lmao. Is that how you talk? They look very different. You obvious never been to Egypt or know anyone who has..... Loser
Gmoney AKA Big G

Woodbridge, VA

#26138 Aug 8, 2014
African AE wrote:
<quoted text>Fact is, Egyptians kept records of all their Dynastys! If you look at the majority of murals, it shows people of different races! A lot of the sculptures do NOT look NGD**D at all!
There were white ancient Egyptians at the time of the pyramids:
5th Dynasty:
www.atlanteangardens.blogspot.com/2014/03/fac...
EGYPT WALL PAINTING showing WHITE EGYPTIANS:
www.superstock.com/stock-photos-images/1788-1...
So was ANCIENT EGYPT MULTI-RACIAL before they were invaded??? PROBABLY!
Modern Egyptians are OVERWHELMINGLY North Africa and Middle Eastern in origin
and dont look very different to other North Africans!
You know what, I never really clicked on any of your links to pay attention to them but unfortunately I just did. My question is, why does all of that crap on your links look so phony. The pics used for reference look phony. Then there is UFO info all over the page. Something is very fishy about the links you choose.... Tighten up over there AE. Start posting some real info. Not this fabricated super hero bullshyt you keep providing.
trollslayer

Hammond, IN

#26139 Aug 8, 2014
Gmoney AKA Big G wrote:
<quoted text>
What??? More handsome than me??? Slimmer than me?? If your slimmer than me, it's because you have no muscles you weak turd. Lmao. Your a gay fool on here talking about how handsome you are. Why does that matter?? Why are you bringing that up while conversations with a guy??? First you call Neanderthals sexy then you talk about how handsome you are.... Sick
"ALF" used to like using the term "flabby butt" when talking to men. He always laces his statements with out of place "sexual commentary". Trust me he's a troll who shouldn't be fed.

Since: May 14

Location hidden

#26140 Aug 8, 2014
African AE wrote:
<quoted text>Fact is, Egyptians kept records of all their Dynastys! If you look at the majority of murals, it shows people of different races! A lot of the sculptures do NOT look NGD**D at all!
There were white ancient Egyptians at the time of the pyramids:
5th Dynasty:
www.atlanteangardens.blogspot.com/2014/03/fac...
EGYPT WALL PAINTING showing WHITE EGYPTIANS:
www.superstock.com/stock-photos-images/1788-1...
So was ANCIENT EGYPT MULTI-RACIAL before they were invaded??? PROBABLY!
Modern Egyptians are OVERWHELMINGLY North Africa and Middle Eastern in origin
and dont look very different to other North Africans!
Fact is, If you are listening to the Egyptians, they tell you where they came from. So no matter what anyone thinks, that should be enough. They are a of Black lineage, and they tell you that themselves. It doesn't matter if they thought themselves separate people, they knew where they came from. Just like AA know they are born in America, but they know there lineage is Africa predominately. Separating Africa from North to South, East, West, and Central, is a racist tactic. Granted Africa, can be very tribal, but there is no indication that there was not constant communication, trade etc. happening within all of Africa. You can go many places in Africa, and they will tell you, this group lived there, that group is down there, we are from there etc.
African AE

Durban, South Africa

#26141 Aug 8, 2014
Gmoney AKA Big G wrote:
<quoted text>
Lmao.... Weak. You're the one that barros put under his wing. Your a puss wuss and he's a transgendered bigot. You call him your milf all night while you stand behind him like some scene from a jail.... Ewww, you broke back mountain puss wusses need to go kill yourselves.
LOL NOPE youre the one in love with Barros! You and Trannie Troll!
Soul Hunter

Los Angeles, CA

#26142 Aug 8, 2014
Doesn't matter what race they were they and their civilization is dead and gone.
African AE

Durban, South Africa

#26143 Aug 8, 2014
Obsidian2xxx wrote:
<quoted text>
Fact is, If you are listening to the Egyptians, they tell you where they came from. So no matter what anyone thinks, that should be enough. They are a of Black lineage, and they tell you that themselves. It doesn't matter if they thought themselves separate people, they knew where they came from. Just like AA know they are born in America, but they know there lineage is Africa predominately. Separating Africa from North to South, East, West, and Central, is a racist tactic. Granted Africa, can be very tribal, but there is no indication that there was not constant communication, trade etc. happening within all of Africa. You can go many places in Africa, and they will tell you, this group lived there, that group is down there, we are from there etc.
ABSOLUTE FACT IS, ancient Egypt traded with people as far as INDIA! They traded with the WHITE EURASIAN Middle East and WHITE LIBYANS (as painted on ancient Egyptian walls) How the hell could Egypt live between two WHITE neighbours and be black only?

Maybe long before the pyramids, Egypt was black, but not during the different dynasties!
THIS IS AN 12th DYNASTY RULER! DOES HE LOOK LIKE A NGR**D:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:GD-EG-Louxor-116.J...
Ancient Egyptian looking NOTHING like a NGR**D builds largest pyramid at Giza:
www.flickr.com/photos/menesje/8480102302/

ANCIENT EGYPTIANS at the time of the Pyramids were MULTI-RACIAL and INDIGENOUS North Africans looking EXACTLY like MODERN NORTH AFRICANS!
African AE

Durban, South Africa

#26144 Aug 8, 2014
Gmoney AKA Big G wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh and you were referring to Neanderthal man when you were talking because your exact quote was that the sapien women couldn't keep their hands off of the SEXY Neanderthals..... Faag.
Youre a big fat fairy! Fact is, neanderthals f--ked all the Africans so the Africans MUST HAVE THOUGHT THEY WERE SEXY!
FACT IS, Europeans/Middle Eastern people look MORE like the NEANDERTHAL than black Africans!

Since: May 14

Location hidden

#26145 Aug 8, 2014
Soul Hunter wrote:
Doesn't matter what race they were they and their civilization is dead and gone.
No, they are still there.
http://www.realhistoryww.com/world_history/an... *gros/egypt4a.jpg
http://www.realhistoryww.com/world_history/an... *gros/egypt72.jpg
http://img1.photographersdirect.com/img/14924...
http://i95.photobucket.com/albums/l128/KING9_...

Since: May 14

Location hidden

#26146 Aug 8, 2014
Their has been a connection with all Africans with each other from the beginning.

"The M2 lineage is mainly found primarily in "eastern", "sub-saharan", and sub-equatorial African groups, those with the highest frequency of the "Broad" trend physiognomy, but found also in notable frequencies in Nubia and Upper Egypt, as indicated by the RFLP TaqI 49a, f variant IV (see Lucotte and Mercier, 2003; Al-Zahery et al. 2003 for equivalecies of markers), which is affiliated with it. The distribution of these markers in other parts of Africa has usually been explained by the "Bantu migrations", but their presence in the Nile Valley in non-Bantu speakers cannot be explained in this way. Their existence is better explained by their being present in populations of the early Holocene Sahara, who in part went on to people the Nile Valley in the mid-Holocene, according to Hassan (1988); this occured long before the "Bantu migrations", which also do not exlain the high frequency of M2 in Senegal, since there are no Bantu speakers there either". S.O.Y. Keita American Journal of Human Biology 16:679-689 (2004)

Basil Davidson in the 1980's (before the widespread use of genetics) displayed this common ancestry between West Africans and Egyptians via the Saharan very clearly in his documentary.

The cultural connections are seen in everything from hundreds of shared words between many West African tribes and ancient Egyptian, to religion, to style and dress. I don't know (well yeah I do) why so many non black people appear to be so threatened and determined to dismiss this clearly connection.
Anonymous

Mountain View, CA

#26147 Aug 9, 2014
Lance wrote:
Many Ancient royal Egyptian wore wigs.
The Destruction of Black Civilization
1. "Ignore or refuse to publish any facts of African history" that would not support
their racial theories.
2. "Create a religious and 'scientific' doctrine" to ease the white conscience for
oppressing and enslaving African people.
3. "Flood the world with hastily thrown together African 'histories'" that contain
European perspectives only.
4. "Start renaming people and places. Replace African names of persons, places, and
things with Arabic and European names." This will disguise their true black identity.
5. Change the criteria for defining race. For example, one drop of Negro blood in
America makes you a Negro, no matter how light your skin. When reporting ancient
history, reverse the standard. Make one drop of white blood render someone a
Caucasian no matter how dark the skin.(Test this criteria during the
"riding-at-the-back-of the-bus" era of the South during the 1940s in the USA. Be
assured that any of the Pharaoh's of Egypt, especially up to and including the 25th
Dynasty, would have been required to sit at the back of the bus.)
6. When black participation in civilization is so obvious your best schemes can't
hide it, find a way to attribute the success to outside white influence.
7. When all the ancient historians contradict your theory, seek to discredit them.
I completely agree with Lance; in cross-referencing, you will find the same evidence that indicates the color, and bone structures are indeed those of Native African "Black" people when studying the remains of ancient Egyptian human fossils. It is obvious that some people just refuse to hear the truth. Even when evidence is found that proves them wrong, such people would just pervert the truth by hiding or eliminating the facts. They are playing devil's advocate with their debates like a defense attorney for historical murderers; assassinating the heritage of African descendants over-and-over again. It's really sad because you don't see Native Africans re-creating history with false accounts in Europe; it would be quite rare to find Native Africans claiming they were the ones who wrote Shakespeare's plays, or built the Great Wall of China... Yet that is what keeps happening with the re-writing of the history of Africa's original "Black" people! Impostors! Another brood of vipers born each generation to keep the lies going,(shaking my head). Shameful!
Gmoney AKA Big G

Stafford, VA

#26148 Aug 9, 2014
African AE wrote:
<quoted text>Youre a big fat fairy! Fact is, neanderthals f--ked all the Africans so the Africans MUST HAVE THOUGHT THEY WERE SEXY!
FACT IS, Europeans/Middle Eastern people look MORE like the NEANDERTHAL than black Africans!
I'm done.... I'll let you be the idiot on your own.
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#26149 Aug 9, 2014
Denise Spencer wrote:
<quoted text>
I completely agree with Lance; in cross-referencing, you will find the same evidence that indicates the color, and bone structures are indeed those of Native African "Black" people when studying the remains of ancient Egyptian human fossils. It is obvious that some people just refuse to hear the truth. Even when evidence is found that proves them wrong, such people would just pervert the truth by hiding or eliminating the facts. They are playing devil's advocate with their debates like a defense attorney for historical murderers; assassinating the heritage of African descendants over-and-over again. It's really sad because you don't see Native Africans re-creating history with false accounts in Europe; it would be quite rare to find Native Africans claiming they were the ones who wrote Shakespeare's plays, or built the Great Wall of China... Yet that is what keeps happening with the re-writing of the history of Africa's original "Black" people! Impostors! Another brood of vipers born each generation to keep the lies going,(shaking my head). Shameful!
ANCIENT WHITE EGYPTIANS:
www.burlingtonnews.net/redhairedmummiesegypt....
ANCIENT EGYPTIANS looking NOTHING LIKE NGR**DS:
www.flickr.com/photos/menesje/8480102302/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ankhhaf
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:GD-EG-Louxor-116.J...
EGYPT AT THE TIMES OF THE PYRAMIDS WAS MULTI-RACIAL!

Yes I agree Native Africans DO NOT claim others people history! They NOT like Afronazis WHO DO CLAIM everyones elses history! The Hebrews were black, the Vikings were black, the Chinese were black BLAH BLAH BLAH!
asho

Eskilstuna, Sweden

#26150 Aug 9, 2014
Here is what barros the common sense bankrupt "teacher" wrote on another. He thinks the ancestor modern human was light skinned in hot ass East Africa.

"["Ish_tov"]To claim that all modern humans descend from people who are like modern "black" people is simplistic at best. The common ancestor was unlike any of us.
West Africans as well as southern Indians, Australians, Papuans, and others, are today darker than that common ancestor. Many others are lighter.
DNA confirms that skin color is not equivalent to geneological closeness. A very dark-skinned Melanesian, for example, is more closely related to a SE Asian, other Asians, and even to northern Europeans than to any African.
The various "racial" traits do not co-vary. None of them can be used to determine who is related to whom. They are superficial characteristics which evolve rapidly in response to environment.
Proof of this is in the aforementioned dogs. Look how varied they are, from a chihuahua to a doberman to a poodle. Yet DNA indicates they descend from common wolf ancestors less than half as long ago as the 70,000 years which separate most humans. Their traits were artificially bred by humans, but nonetheless this illustrates how great differences in appearance can be without there being a correspondingly great genetic variation."
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#26151 Aug 9, 2014
asho wrote:
Here is what barros the common sense bankrupt "teacher" wrote on another. He thinks the ancestor modern human was light skinned in hot ass East Africa.
"["Ish_tov"]To claim that all modern humans descend from people who are like modern "black" people is simplistic at best. The common ancestor was unlike any of us.
West Africans as well as southern Indians, Australians, Papuans, and others, are today darker than that common ancestor. Many others are lighter.
DNA confirms that skin color is not equivalent to geneological closeness. A very dark-skinned Melanesian, for example, is more closely related to a SE Asian, other Asians, and even to northern Europeans than to any African.
The various "racial" traits do not co-vary. None of them can be used to determine who is related to whom. They are superficial characteristics which evolve rapidly in response to environment.
Proof of this is in the aforementioned dogs. Look how varied they are, from a chihuahua to a doberman to a poodle. Yet DNA indicates they descend from common wolf ancestors less than half as long ago as the 70,000 years which separate most humans. Their traits were artificially bred by humans, but nonetheless this illustrates how great differences in appearance can be without there being a correspondingly great genetic variation."
Ancient Africans leaving Africa did NOT LOOK like modern Africans!
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hofmeyr_skull
Europeans and Middle Eastern people still look more like the 200 000 year old neanderthal than black Africans!

Since: May 14

Location hidden

#26152 Aug 9, 2014
Denise Spencer wrote:
<quoted text>
I completely agree with Lance; in cross-referencing, you will find the same evidence that indicates the color, and bone structures are indeed those of Native African "Black" people when studying the remains of ancient Egyptian human fossils. It is obvious that some people just refuse to hear the truth. Even when evidence is found that proves them wrong, such people would just pervert the truth by hiding or eliminating the facts. They are playing devil's advocate with their debates like a defense attorney for historical murderers; assassinating the heritage of African descendants over-and-over again. It's really sad because you don't see Native Africans re-creating history with false accounts in Europe; it would be quite rare to find Native Africans claiming they were the ones who wrote Shakespeare's plays, or built the Great Wall of China... Yet that is what keeps happening with the re-writing of the history of Africa's original "Black" people! Impostors! Another brood of vipers born each generation to keep the lies going,(shaking my head). Shameful!
They are not PLAYING the devils advocate. They are playing the Devil, smh. The meaning of devil, is one who cause confusion.

Since: May 14

Location hidden

#26153 Aug 9, 2014
African AE wrote:
<quoted text>Ancient Africans leaving Africa did NOT LOOK like modern Africans!
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hofmeyr_skull
Europeans and Middle Eastern people still look more like the 200 000 year old neanderthal than black Africans!
IF THEY DID NOT LOOK LIKE AFRICANS, THEN TELL US WHY THERE ARE BLACK PEOPLE ALL OVER THE WORLD STILL TODAY THAT WAS OOA! EXPLAIN WHY THEY ARE SOME OF THE OLDEST PEOPLE AND ARE STILL BLACK! IF THEY IMEADIATELY TURNED BLACK WITHIN 9 MONTH'S, HOW ARE THEY BLACK NOW!

You continue to avoid answering the simple questions. You talk about there DNA is different than other Africans, which does not matter in the least, because OTHER Africans who live on the continent have different DNA from each other!

Full blooded Aboriganie people looked no different than any other African! NO difference!

A TOTAL GENOCIDE OF A PEOPLE, AND YOU SAY THAT DISPLACEMENT AND RAPE, ETC. COULD'T HAVE HAPPENED IN NORTH AFRICA, WHEN IT HAS HAPPENED NUMEROUS PLACES IN THE WORLD? DO YOU LIVE UNDER A ROCK?

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons...

ANOTHER:

http://www.pcw.iinet.net.au/Australia/Trugani...

AGAIN:

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/--Z1fvu07i5o/UTMZtPt...

Heres a page about Austraila, notice how the man dyes his hair red, like many in Africa!!!! NO, difference!

http://www.convictcreations.com/aborigines/pr...

Now Andamanese again RED HAIR DYE!

http://hucipher.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/i...

https://farm1.static.flickr.com/203/512064441...

http://i38.tinypic.com/20apf5y.gif

I can go on forever with the Andamanese, fact is they all look Black African period, so your DNA theory is debunked!! Just by those people existing!!

Their DNA, did not cause them to look any different than your average Black African, East or West etc.

Look!!!

http://farm8.static.flickr.com/7457/989695030...

Now, Pacific Islands:

http://www.gutenberg.org/files/18450/18450-h/...

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons...

http://realhistoryww.com/world_history/ancien...

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons...

And here a page from your favorite source to hit the nail on the head!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fijian_people

THESE PEOPLE LOOK NO DIFFERENT THAN ANY GIVEN AFRICAN PEOPLE!!!!

These people represent how people looked all over the world in ancient times! They populated the whole of the earth!!!! They left Africa, made it through Asia, and Europe etc.
And maintained their Phenotype.

YOU ARE DEBUNKED!

You consistently try to separate Africa from itself and other places in the world, when it's a clear connection with all people of the world to each other!!

Since: May 14

Location hidden

#26154 Aug 9, 2014
Obsidian2xxx wrote:
<quoted text>
IF THEY DID NOT LOOK LIKE AFRICANS, THEN TELL US WHY THERE ARE BLACK PEOPLE ALL OVER THE WORLD STILL TODAY THAT WAS OOA! EXPLAIN WHY THEY ARE SOME OF THE OLDEST PEOPLE AND ARE STILL BLACK! IF THEY IMEADIATELY TURNED BLACK WITHIN 9 MONTH'S, HOW ARE THEY BLACK NOW!
You continue to avoid answering the simple questions. You talk about there DNA is different than other Africans, which does not matter in the least, because OTHER Africans who live on the continent have different DNA from each other!
Full blooded Aboriganie people looked no different than any other African! NO difference!
A TOTAL GENOCIDE OF A PEOPLE, AND YOU SAY THAT DISPLACEMENT AND RAPE, ETC. COULD'T HAVE HAPPENED IN NORTH AFRICA, WHEN IT HAS HAPPENED NUMEROUS PLACES IN THE WORLD? DO YOU LIVE UNDER A ROCK?
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons...
ANOTHER:
http://www.pcw.iinet.net.au/Australia/Trugani...
AGAIN:
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/--Z1fvu07i5o/UTMZtPt...
Heres a page about Austraila, notice how the man dyes his hair red, like many in Africa!!!! NO, difference!
http://www.convictcreations.com/aborigines/pr...
Now Andamanese again RED HAIR DYE!
http://hucipher.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/i...
https://farm1.static.flickr.com/203/512064441...
http://i38.tinypic.com/20apf5y.gif
I can go on forever with the Andamanese, fact is they all look Black African period, so your DNA theory is debunked!! Just by those people existing!!
Their DNA, did not cause them to look any different than your average Black African, East or West etc.
Look!!!
http://farm8.static.flickr.com/7457/989695030...
Now, Pacific Islands:
http://www.gutenberg.org/files/18450/18450-h/...
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons...
http://realhistoryww.com/world_history/ancien...
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons...
And here a page from your favorite source to hit the nail on the head!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fijian_people
THESE PEOPLE LOOK NO DIFFERENT THAN ANY GIVEN AFRICAN PEOPLE!!!!
These people represent how people looked all over the world in ancient times! They populated the whole of the earth!!!! They left Africa, made it through Asia, and Europe etc.
And maintained their Phenotype.
YOU ARE DEBUNKED!
You consistently try to separate Africa from itself and other places in the world, when it's a clear connection with all people of the world to each other!!
Immediately turned white*
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#26155 Aug 9, 2014
Obsidian2xxx wrote:
<quoted text>
IF THEY DID NOT LOOK LIKE AFRICANS, THEN TELL US WHY THERE ARE BLACK PEOPLE ALL OVER THE WORLD STILL TODAY THAT WAS OOA! EXPLAIN WHY THEY ARE SOME OF THE OLDEST PEOPLE AND ARE STILL BLACK! IF THEY IMEADIATELY TURNED BLACK WITHIN 9 MONTH'S, HOW ARE THEY BLACK NOW!
You continue to avoid answering the simple questions. You talk about there DNA is different than other Africans, which does not matter in the least, because OTHER Africans who live on the continent have different DNA from each other!
Full blooded Aboriganie people looked no different than any other African! NO difference!
A TOTAL GENOCIDE OF A PEOPLE, AND YOU SAY THAT DISPLACEMENT AND RAPE, ETC. COULD'T HAVE HAPPENED IN NORTH AFRICA, WHEN IT HAS HAPPENED NUMEROUS PLACES IN THE WORLD? DO YOU LIVE UNDER A ROCK?
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons...
ANOTHER:
http://www.pcw.iinet.net.au/Australia/Trugani...
AGAIN:
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/--Z1fvu07i5o/UTMZtPt...
Heres a page about Austraila, notice how the man dyes his hair red, like many in Africa!!!! NO, difference!
http://www.convictcreations.com/aborigines/pr...
Now Andamanese again RED HAIR DYE!
http://hucipher.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/i...
https://farm1.static.flickr.com/203/512064441...
http://i38.tinypic.com/20apf5y.gif
I can go on forever with the Andamanese, fact is they all look Black African period, so your DNA theory is debunked!! Just by those people existing!!
Their DNA, did not cause them to look any different than your average Black African, East or West etc.
Look!!!
http://farm8.static.flickr.com/7457/989695030...
Now, Pacific Islands:
http://www.gutenberg.org/files/18450/18450-h/...
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons...
http://realhistoryww.com/world_history/ancien...
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons...
And here a page from your favorite source to hit the nail on the head!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fijian_people
THESE PEOPLE LOOK NO DIFFERENT THAN ANY GIVEN AFRICAN PEOPLE!!!!
These people represent how people looked all over the world in ancient times! They populated the whole of the earth!!!! They left Africa, made it through Asia, and Europe etc.
And maintained their Phenotype.
YOU ARE DEBUNKED!
You consistently try to separate Africa from itself and other places in the world, when it's a clear connection with all people of the world to each other!!
The scientists said in that Wiki link, ancient Africans did not look like modern Africans! The Skhul,Qafzeh skeletons of ancient Africans found in the Middle East were ARCHAIC HOMINIDS!
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skhul_and_Qafzeh_homini...
ASIANS ARE MIXED WITH THE DENISOVAN Neanderthal and look like him! In fact Melanisians/Aborigines have 5% Denisovan DNA!
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denisovan
Go back 30 000 years, half of all the DNA of Aborigines/Melanisians would be Denisovan! So are they completely related to Africans? UM...NO! DNA also changes over time thats why Asians ARE NOT related to Africans!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 5 min RealDave 1,152,933
Bill Cosby Won't Be Charged 5 min Pudding Popper 1
----- OMG!! BM Marries INDIAN BEAUTY!!! 5 min Lori-usa 173
Why are black people so weak? (Nov '08) 5 min Michele 195
White South African woman new Miss World 2014! 6 min anon 165
What music are you listening to right now? (Sep '08) 6 min Redefined 32,962
asian, white, and latina women prefer wm. (Nov '13) 6 min jenny 33
the moors were black africans not arabs!!! (Jun '08) 7 min Gmoney 28,253
Hebrew Israelite (Feb '11) 7 min Raoul 97,560
The "Exodus" movie is a LIE 11 min jenny 406
Porn star Alexis Texas refuses to do scenes wit... 36 min Big Knob 110