I need proof that the Ancient Egyptia...
African AE

Durban, South Africa

#25886 Jul 29, 2014
Gmoney AKA Big G wrote:
<quoted text>
They carry DNA from the Middle East because the dark skin early European inhabitants who were Afroasiatic people carried those genes into Europe with them. Europeans look nothing like middle eastern people. Stop the lies
LOL These INDIGENOUS M.E. people LOOK EXACTLY like Europeans. After all they are the ancestors of Europeans:
www.youtube.com/watch...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranian_peoples
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assyrian_people
Whats that about Europeans not looking like Middle Eastern people?????LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Early Europeans were CAUCASIAN CROMAGNON carrying Haplogroup U and N from Asia and looking NOTHING like Africans!
African AE

Durban, South Africa

#25887 Jul 29, 2014
Gmoney AKA Big G wrote:
More on the Afroasiatics who are the first modern man in Asia besides pure Africans.....
http://afroasiatics.blogspot.com/2013/06/norm...
LOL Real ancient Middle Eastern people LOOKING EXACTLY like MODERN Middle Eastern people and Europeans:
PHOENICIANS:
www.lessingimages.com/viewimage.asp...
www.metmuseum.org/toah/works-of-art/74.51.245...
UR OF THE CHALDEANS (Abrahams people) PAINT THEMSELVES AS WHITE:
www.penn.museum/sites/iraq/...
SUMERIANS:
www.arthistoryworlds.org/sculpture-from-sumer...
African AE

Durban, South Africa

#25888 Jul 29, 2014
Gmoney AKA Big G wrote:
More on the Afroasiatics who are the first modern man in Asia besides pure Africans.....
http://afroasiatics.blogspot.com/2013/06/norm...
The first African outside Africa LOOKED NOTHING like modern Africans:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hofmeyr_skull

Insect Trust
Level 1

Since: Aug 13

Location hidden

#25889 Jul 29, 2014
Gmoney AKA Big G wrote:
<quoted text>
DNA proves none of this and neither do you. It was Afroasiatic DNA that enter Africa so long ago. Eurasian DNA is new and the Tuareg is Mid Eastern and African. You know nothing about archaeological literature. All you know is bogus bullshyt.
You're so full of crap. There is no “Afroasiatic” people recognized by archaeologists. Genetically, people can be divided into either African or Eurasian. Everyone is in one of those categories. The Maghreb has been predominantly Eurasian for 30k years. This is proven, and you know it, liar.

LOL at you knowing about archaeological literature. That's funny.

You only learned how to spell “DNA” last week, so shut up.

Insect Trust
Level 1

Since: Aug 13

Location hidden

#25890 Jul 29, 2014
Gmoney AKA Big G wrote:
<quoted text>
Europeans became white in Europe because they were experiencing the same arctic conditions Neanderthal did during earlier glacial periods and because they lived in caves for a few thousand years.
Wrong, gay clown.

Arctic conditions? LOL... no... they were not in the Arctic. Skin lightened because of low uV levels. People in northeastern Asia also became light and for the same reason.

Living in caves has nothing to do with it, fool. Do you think a cave-dweller never leaves the cave to go outside? You are truly stupid.

Insect Trust
Level 1

Since: Aug 13

Location hidden

#25891 Jul 29, 2014
Gmoney AKA Big G wrote:
<quoted text>
Did the originate in Europe??? Uuhhh no. That's why your idiotic sarcastic bullshyt doesn't make since. Afroasiatic makes since because they came from Africa and migrated to Asia. Don't compare my claims to yours. They are nothing alike. You have no basis for your sarcastic rebuttal. I on the other hand have the proof which is evident of their departure from Africa which makes them Africans in Asia...lmao... What an idiot you are.
Wrong again, butt clown.

No such thing as Afroasiatic people. The OOA people were Eurasians. You have yet to tell us which DNA is “Afroasiatic”, LOL!!! What a dimwitted DROPOUT!!!

No, I think we'll stick with Eurafrican for anyone with Y-DNA E, since DE was in Eurasia. Only the khoisan and twa are Africans. Others are Eurafricans.

You have no proof of anything you say, boy. You're a fool and a clown.

Insect Trust
Level 1

Since: Aug 13

Location hidden

#25892 Jul 29, 2014
Gmoney AKA Big G wrote:
<quoted text>
Look at the pot calling the kettle black.
Look at the gay clown putting on his lipstick.
lmao

Arlington, VA

#25893 Jul 29, 2014
Insect Trust wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong, gay clown.
Arctic conditions? LOL... no... they were not in the Arctic. Skin lightened because of low uV levels. People in northeastern Asia also became light and for the same reason.
Living in caves has nothing to do with it, fool. Do you think a cave-dweller never leaves the cave to go outside? You are truly stupid.
The origin of pale skin is Africa, sub-Saharan to be exact. What did low UV levels have to do with pale skin in sub-Saharan Africans clown @$$ Mexican?

Insect Trust
Level 1

Since: Aug 13

Location hidden

#25894 Jul 29, 2014
Gmoney AKA Big G wrote:
<quoted text>
You've already been through what??? Stop bytchin butt boy. If you feel you are wasting your time, leave. There has been Afroasiatic DNA in the Maghreb for 30ky. Eurasians didn't exist yet.
Eurasians existed at the time of OOA, when CF & D, M & N had appeared.

30,000 years later, Eurasians entered the Maghreb. Yes, they'd been in Eurasia for 30k years but weren't yet Eurasians? LOL.

You racist piece of dung. Who are “Eurasian” to you? Only blond Nordics? LOL!!!

You know nothing, boy. According to you, most of Eurasia is still populated by “Afroasiatics”! LOL!!!

What an IDIOT! CRETIN! MORON! IMBECILE! DIMWIT! DULLARD! DOLT!

Yes, you're a dumbass.

Insect Trust
Level 1

Since: Aug 13

Location hidden

#25895 Jul 29, 2014
trollslayer wrote:
Gmoney AKA Big G wrote:
<quoted text>
E is an African haplogroup. It is not from the Middle East. E arose in AFRICA 50,000bc. Some of E migrated to the Middle East and most of E remained in Africa. Back migration is irrelevant because the haplogroup has always been African.
<quoted text>
G did you see that....."You flabby fat-butt..." what other other troll uses that term.
'barros' may be using a 'proxy'.
No, since DE was in Eurasia, and E likely split from it in Eurasia and then migrated into Africa, that means YOU are a Eurafrican, fool!

Egypt, Nok, Ghana, Mali, Songhai, Zimbabwe, Aksum... all Eurafrican civilizations.
Gmoney AKA Big G

Petersburg, VA

#25896 Jul 29, 2014
Insect Trust wrote:
<quoted text>
You're so full of crap. There is no “Afroasiatic” people recognized by archaeologists. Genetically, people can be divided into either African or Eurasian. Everyone is in one of those categories. The Maghreb has been predominantly Eurasian for 30k years. This is proven, and you know it, liar.
LOL at you knowing about archaeological literature. That's funny.
You only learned how to spell “DNA” last week, so shut up.
Regardless of what you say, the first Asians were African and then Afroasiatics.
Gmoney AKA Big G

Petersburg, VA

#25897 Jul 29, 2014
Insect Trust wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong, gay clown.
Arctic conditions? LOL... no... they were not in the Arctic. Skin lightened because of low uV levels. People in northeastern Asia also became light and for the same reason.
Living in caves has nothing to do with it, fool. Do you think a cave-dweller never leaves the cave to go outside? You are truly stupid.
You're so stupid that you don't even recognize a general comparison in a conversation. Arctic conditions doesn't not imply they were in the arctic. It's just a relating factor. The conditions in the arctic are well below freezing in temp and so it was in Europe during the glacial period. What a loser you are. No one is talking about north east Asia. We are talking about Europe and Western Asia. No one lightened for the same reason in west Asia. Whether they went outside is irrelevant since during the glacial period, the earth received even less sunlight in the northern regions. They stayed in caves a majority of the time to keep warm fool. They for damn sure weren't building houses in Europe 15,000bc so yes, caves were their homes.
Gmoney AKA Big G

Petersburg, VA

#25898 Jul 29, 2014
Insect Trust wrote:
<quoted text>
Eurasians existed at the time of OOA, when CF & D, M & N had appeared.
30,000 years later, Eurasians entered the Maghreb. Yes, they'd been in Eurasia for 30k years but weren't yet Eurasians? LOL.
You racist piece of dung. Who are “Eurasian” to you? Only blond Nordics? LOL!!!
You know nothing, boy. According to you, most of Eurasia is still populated by “Afroasiatics”! LOL!!!
What an IDIOT! CRETIN! MORON! IMBECILE! DIMWIT! DULLARD! DOLT!
Yes, you're a dumbass.
Lmao... Your so angry. Yea maybe they existed as Neanderthals but they sure didn't exist as sapiens. Eurasian sapiens did not exist until after 30,000bc and well after that.
Gmoney AKA Big G

Petersburg, VA

#25899 Jul 29, 2014
Insect Trust wrote:
<quoted text>
No, since DE was in Eurasia, and E likely split from it in Eurasia and then migrated into Africa, that means YOU are a Eurafrican, fool!
Egypt, Nok, Ghana, Mali, Songhai, Zimbabwe, Aksum... all Eurafrican civilizations.
SMH.... So much animosity for someone who is here to be entertained. You're nothing but the entertainment itself.... C,F,D,E and it's early descendants are all AFROASIATIC.....lmao

Insect Trust
Level 1

Since: Aug 13

Location hidden

#25900 Jul 29, 2014
lmao wrote:
<quoted text>
The origin of pale skin is Africa, sub-Saharan to be exact. What did low UV levels have to do with pale skin in sub-Saharan Africans clown @$$ Mexican?
You stupid f'ing racist. How I'd love to pound your face, boy. You f'ing 3-in-1 species hybrid.

“Pale” skin? LOL... wrong, boy. As always, you don't know $hit about science. So Africans are as light as Swedes? As light as Japanese?

F U, boy.

Specific alleles for light skin appeared in Eurasia among Eurasians, boy. Those alleles were not in Africa. You obviously know nothing about evolution.

For 60,000 years Eurasians have been evolving unique traits in interaction with Eurasian environments.

And YOU, boy, are not a Hebrew.

Insect Trust
Level 1

Since: Aug 13

Location hidden

#25901 Jul 29, 2014
Gmoney AKA Big G wrote:
<quoted text>
Lmao... Your so angry. Yea maybe they existed as Neanderthals but they sure didn't exist as sapiens. Eurasian sapiens did not exist until after 30,000bc and well after that.
Wrong, uneducated nitwit boy.

Eurasians existed 60,000 years ago. That is the time of their origin.

Neandertals have nothing to do with it. We're talking about sapiens. Though mixing with neandertals did provide some new traits for the Eurasians who were doing that schtupping of neandertalensis 60,000 years ago.

But the Eurasian DNA types date to 60,00 years ago. Do tell us, clown boy, you puffy poof, with which DNA haplogroups do Eurasians begin? LOL!!!

Why, please explain gaydummy, did the people entering the Maghreb 30k bp have Cro-Magnon morphology and Eurasian DNA, eh, boy? Cro-Magnon, who in Europe by that time already had Y-type I, same type very common in Europe today. You moron. You fool.

Type F is still around today in Eurasia... so is C. LOL!!!

So are you going to tell us that Siberians are Afroasiatic? Native Americans too? LOL!!!

LOL!!! DAMN you're one stupid $hit!
lmao

Arlington, VA

#25902 Jul 29, 2014
Insect Trust wrote:
<quoted text>
You stupid f'ing racist. How I'd love to pound your face, boy. You f'ing 3-in-1 species hybrid.
“Pale” skin? LOL... wrong, boy. As always, you don't know $hit about science. So Africans are as light as Swedes? As light as Japanese?
F U, boy.
Specific alleles for light skin appeared in Eurasia among Eurasians, boy. Those alleles were not in Africa. You obviously know nothing about evolution.
For 60,000 years Eurasians have been evolving unique traits in interaction with Eurasian environments.
And YOU, boy, are not a Hebrew.
Name some alleles that are novel in Eurasians clown @$$ Mexican and quit your crying!
Gmoney AKA Big G

Fairfax, VA

#25903 Jul 29, 2014
Insect Trust wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong, uneducated nitwit boy.
Eurasians existed 60,000 years ago. That is the time of their origin.
Neandertals have nothing to do with it. We're talking about sapiens. Though mixing with neandertals did provide some new traits for the Eurasians who were doing that schtupping of neandertalensis 60,000 years ago.
But the Eurasian DNA types date to 60,00 years ago. Do tell us, clown boy, you puffy poof, with which DNA haplogroups do Eurasians begin? LOL!!!
Why, please explain gaydummy, did the people entering the Maghreb 30k bp have Cro-Magnon morphology and Eurasian DNA, eh, boy? Cro-Magnon, who in Europe by that time already had Y-type I, same type very common in Europe today. You moron. You fool.
Type F is still around today in Eurasia... so is C. LOL!!!
So are you going to tell us that Siberians are Afroasiatic? Native Americans too? LOL!!!
LOL!!! DAMN you're one stupid $hit!
What I'm saying is some of their DNA is Afroasiatic. C and F are not the only elements if DNA that represent these people. C and F existing now has nothing to do with the fact that in its beginnings, it was formed amongst African people in Asia= Afroasiatics.

Insect Trust
Level 1

Since: Aug 13

Location hidden

#25904 Jul 29, 2014
lmao wrote:
<quoted text>
Name some alleles that are novel in Eurasians clown @$$ Mexican and quit your crying!
Mornoic subhuman racist... are you actually claiming that NO new alleles have arisen among eurasians in 60k years? That is beyond stupid, boy.

Were both your parents stupid? This is congenital, no?

Notice the allele for blond hair which Afronazis claim means that white people appeared only 6000 years ago, LOL!!!

Even your own Afronazi cohorts know there are Eurasian alleles.

Boy.

Come spew a few ethnic slurs in my presence, boy.

Insect Trust
Level 1

Since: Aug 13

Location hidden

#25905 Jul 29, 2014
Gmoney AKA Big G wrote:
<quoted text>
You're so stupid that you don't even recognize a general comparison in a conversation. Arctic conditions doesn't not imply they were in the arctic. It's just a relating factor. The conditions in the arctic are well below freezing in temp and so it was in Europe during the glacial period. What a loser you are. No one is talking about north east Asia. We are talking about Europe and Western Asia. No one lightened for the same reason in west Asia. Whether they went outside is irrelevant since during the glacial period, the earth received even less sunlight in the northern regions. They stayed in caves a majority of the time to keep warm fool. They for damn sure weren't building houses in Europe 15,000bc so yes, caves were their homes.
Wrong, dumbass.

Arctic conditions includes a whole set of climatic factors, not just freezing temperatures.

That would be like claiming that if it's 80º in Saskatchewan, they are experiencing “tropical conditions”.

You drooling dimwit!

Boy, you stupid fool, yes Europeans WERE building houses 15,000 years ago. You wish to pretend Europeans were cave-dwellers for millennia simply because you're a lowlife vile stinking RACIST, boy.

Oh sure, they were in the caves and didn't go out to hunt? Again you have a very distorted view of the glacial periods as well of Europe generally, boy.

Yep, you're dumb as a turd.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 min Dudley 1,481,564
How come the Africans didn't invent anything mo... 3 min Who ya 7
Yes! Victorian Dresses "DID" COPY natural curva... 6 min Redefined 52
whitey is back in the white house 10 min PorchHonkey 12
News Do we need diversity requirements for Cabinet p... 13 min Ronald 6
News King's legacy celebrated as Trump, Lewis duel l... 14 min Aquarius-wy 229
Poll Will Donald Trump be the next President of the ... (Aug '15) 20 min PATRIOT DVC MOLON... 2,003
No more BM/BW couple? Is black love dead? 2 hr Dan snow 82
Eurocentric Myth Busters: Blacks Are Naturally ... 3 hr Snap 88
More from around the web