Africans Are The Only Pure Humans In ...

Africans Are The Only Pure Humans In The World

Posted in the African-American Forum

First Prev
of 34
Next Last
Atari

Europe

#1 Nov 5, 2012
Whites aren't entirely human. Their female ancestors ran away from their scrawny, frail, and impotent counterparts and mated with neanderthals Theirfhttp://www.networlddirec tory.com/blogs/permalinks/7-20 11/non-africans-are-part-neand erthal.html
President Zimmerman 2016

France

#2 Nov 5, 2012
Atari wrote:
Whites aren't entirely human. Their female ancestors ran away from their scrawny, frail, and impotent counterparts and mated with neanderthals Theirfhttp://www.networlddirec tory.com/blogs/permalinks/7-20 11/non-africans-are-part-neand erthal.html
Actually, Cheetah, technically no one alive today is pure human.

1) Modern sapiens split one half became you west coast sub-Saharan non-achieving slave stock and the others populated north east Africa, eventually colonizing the world.

2) Africans are part homo Heidelbergensis or Erectus, they are NOT pure human.

Eurasians are part Neanderthal, they are not pure human.

So you see, Chicken George, no human alive today is PURE Homo Sapien.

Oh, also don't forget that Africa has more diversity amongst its genetics, genetic diversity takes people AWAY from any genetic origin.

God you're dumb, even for a sub-Sahran nigguh.
Atari

Europe

#4 Nov 5, 2012
President Zimmerman 2016 wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, Cheetah, technically no one alive today is pure human.
1) Modern sapiens split one half became you west coast sub-Saharan non-achieving slave stock and the others populated north east Africa, eventually colonizing the world.
2) Africans are part homo Heidelbergensis or Erectus, they are NOT pure human.
Eurasians are part Neanderthal, they are not pure human.
So you see, Chicken George, no human alive today is PURE Homo Sapien.
Oh, also don't forget that Africa has more diversity amongst its genetics, genetic diversity takes people AWAY from any genetic origin.
God you're dumb, even for a sub-Sahran nigguh.
You are spewing hogwash, cretinous neanderthal sub human. Take a break or go wash the trailer.
Atari

Europe

#5 Nov 5, 2012
I reiterate Africans are the only pure humans. Not only are Africans pure human, but they are also the people who are responsible for the existence of the caucasian sub human race.
COL

Phenix City, AL

#6 Nov 5, 2012
President Zimmerman 2016 wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, Cheetah, technically no one alive today is pure human.
1) Modern sapiens split one half became you west coast sub-Saharan non-achieving slave stock and the others populated north east Africa, eventually colonizing the world.
2) Africans are part homo Heidelbergensis or Erectus, they are NOT pure human.
Eurasians are part Neanderthal, they are not pure human.
So you see, Chicken George, no human alive today is PURE Homo Sapien.
Oh, also don't forget that Africa has more diversity amongst its genetics, genetic diversity takes people AWAY from any genetic origin.
God you're dumb, even for a sub-Sahran nigguh.
WRONG, heidelbergensis and erectus died before Modern Homo Sapiens appeared. Dna tests were already performed, and like OP said, africans are the only pure homo sapiens.

Shining in darkness

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#7 Nov 5, 2012
Africans are dumb and look like monkeys.
Atari

Europe

#8 Nov 5, 2012
COL wrote:
<quoted text> WRONG, heidelbergensis and erectus died before Modern Homo Sapiens appeared. Dna tests were already performed, and like OP said, africans are the only pure homo sapiens.
How dumb is that red neck? I pity the fools who wasted value time copulating and exchanging fluids to create him.
COL

Phenix City, AL

#9 Nov 5, 2012
Atari wrote:
<quoted text> How dumb is that red neck? I pity the fools who wasted value time copulating and exchanging fluids to create him.
Whites [rednecks in this case] will say anything to try and put blacks below them, no matter how stupid it sounds when they type it. Anyways, even if heidelbergensis and erectus managed to survive long enough for homo sapiens to appear [impossible], the genes would have been bred out a long time ago because Africa has always had the most diverse primates on earth. Compared to Europe and Aboringal Australians who are the least diverse [inbred] which is why their primitive DNA probably still floats through them in a greater concetration compared to asians.
Barros Serrano

United States

#11 Nov 5, 2012
COL wrote:
<quoted text> WRONG, heidelbergensis and erectus died before Modern Homo Sapiens appeared. Dna tests were already performed, and like OP said, africans are the only pure homo sapiens.
Wrong. Genome analysis indicates a non-sapiens species mixed with W-Central Africans. The only likely candidate is heidelbergensis.

In fact the only pure Homo sapiens on earth is a pure unmixed northeast L3 African, like an Ethiopian or Somali.

Eurasians are all part neandertalensis, and some are part denisova as well.

An Afro-whitey Yank would be part neandertalensis as well as heidelbergensis.
Barros Serrano

United States

#12 Nov 5, 2012
COL wrote:
<quoted text> Whites [rednecks in this case] will say anything to try and put blacks below them, no matter how stupid it sounds when they type it. Anyways, even if heidelbergensis and erectus managed to survive long enough for homo sapiens to appear [impossible], the genes would have been bred out a long time ago because Africa has always had the most diverse primates on earth. Compared to Europe and Aboringal Australians who are the least diverse [inbred] which is why their primitive DNA probably still floats through them in a greater concetration compared to asians.
You know nothing about genetics apparently. The primitive genes would persist regardless of population size, if they were not deleterious, which is to say, maladaptive.

In fact, W-Central Africans TODAY showed non-sapiens DNA in their genome, so nothing was bred out. Face it, you're 3-species-in-one, if you're an Afro-whitey Yank: sapiens, heidelbergensis and neandertalensis.

Jahx
Level 8

Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

#13 Nov 5, 2012
We are the most human people of humanity. Music is the main art [art is a completely human expression] and that's why we always were the best in it.
COL

Phenix City, AL

#14 Nov 5, 2012
Barros Serrano wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong. Genome analysis indicates a non-sapiens species mixed with W-Central Africans. The only likely candidate is heidelbergensis.
In fact the only pure Homo sapiens on earth is a pure unmixed northeast L3 African, like an Ethiopian or Somali.
Eurasians are all part neandertalensis, and some are part denisova as well.
An Afro-whitey Yank would be part neandertalensis as well as heidelbergensis.
Genome anlysis from where? stormfront? Heidelbergensis went extinct 20 millenniums before Homo sapiens appeared, The only possible candidate is homo floresiensis, and even that is unlikely. And i'm not a native-born American so please refrain from calling me a yank.
Black Deal

United States

#15 Nov 5, 2012
Jahx wrote:
We are the most human people of humanity. Music is the main art [art is a completely human expression] and that's why we always were the best in it.
Aint you AA?
COL

Phenix City, AL

#16 Nov 5, 2012
Barros Serrano wrote:
<quoted text>
You know nothing about genetics apparently. The primitive genes would persist regardless of population size, if they were not deleterious, which is to say, maladaptive.
In fact, W-Central Africans TODAY showed non-sapiens DNA in their genome, so nothing was bred out. Face it, you're 3-species-in-one, if you're an Afro-whitey Yank: sapiens, heidelbergensis and neandertalensis.
You know nothing of genetics or primate studies for that matter, arguing with me in both of these topics will only lead to your embarrassment. Heidelbergensis also resided in europe, if these genes persisted why can we not find traces of Heidelbergensis in present day europeans? exactly you are just digging a deeper hole for yourself you euro latin nazi. And once again i am not native-born American, nor do i descend from anyone who has been in America. I'm 1 species and i'm proud to be pure.
BMT

Eskilstuna, Sweden

#17 Nov 5, 2012
President Zimmerman 2016 wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, Cheetah, technically no one alive today is pure human.
1) Modern sapiens split one half became you west coast sub-Saharan non-achieving slave stock and the others populated north east Africa, eventually colonizing the world.

.
North East Africans have neanderthal Dna too. West African are the only pure human.
BMT

Eskilstuna, Sweden

#18 Nov 5, 2012
Barros Serrano wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong. Genome analysis indicates a non-sapiens species mixed with W-Central Africans. The only likely candidate is heidelbergensis.
In fact the only pure Homo sapiens on earth is a pure unmixed northeast L3 African, like an Ethiopian or Somali.
Eurasians are all part neandertalensis, and some are part denisova as well.
An Afro-whitey Yank would be part neandertalensis as well as heidelbergensis.
Rthiopians and somalis are mixed with euroasians, how do expect them to neanderthal DNA free?
Atari

Europe

#19 Nov 5, 2012
Barros Serrano wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong. Genome analysis indicates a non-sapiens species mixed with W-Central Africans. The only likely candidate is heidelbergensis.
In fact the only pure Homo sapiens on earth is a pure unmixed northeast L3 African, like an Ethiopian or Somali.
Eurasians are all part neandertalensis, and some are part denisova as well.
An Afro-whitey Yank would be part neandertalensis as well as heidelbergensis.
The eurocentric genome analysis indicate what? You're an imbecile. This doesn't even pass of as scientific racism, it is pure excreta expelled from the bowels of a cretinous neanderthal.

It's always amusing to see an imbecile neanderthal posting far fetched drivel. You're nothing but a cretinous pissant, boy.
Atari

Europe

#20 Nov 5, 2012
Barros Serrano wrote:
<quoted text>
You know nothing about genetics apparently.
The same can be said about you, wop.

Level 4

Since: Aug 12

Poughquag, NY

#21 Nov 6, 2012
Exept Africa may have more Denisova genes than Eastern Europe, South & South West Asia.

http://www.google.com/imgres...
Civilization

Sweden

#22 Nov 6, 2012
Why do we let these animals live in civilization?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 34
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min Gunner 1,419,976
Huma has had enough Weiner! 2 min TheOriginalDoby 2
the moors were black africans not arabs!!! (Jun '08) 12 min Curious Me 47,897
do all black women want mixed babies? 18 min BLM2016 9
Interracial relationships. Who does it AFFECT?... (Sep '15) 18 min KIP 72
Do Black men like Asian girls? (Jul '13) 29 min Oh No You Di-nt 926
Why are black men so jelly of white men when th... 29 min He Dindu Nuffin 23
Blue ivy is UGLY!!!! (Jul '13) 30 min Blkbeauty 59
49er QB Colin Kaepernick is WAKING UP 1 hr KIP 87
Why aren't there any Negroes in the Bible? 2 hr Michel Montvert 568
More from around the web