caucasians were asians !!!

Posted in the African-American Forum

First Prev
of 8
Next Last
New Identity

Toronto, Canada

#1 Feb 9, 2007
White-Caucasians are the Light Skinned off-shoots of Asian-Indians, and NOT the off-shoots of Negroid-Africans !!! Caucasians were in Asia long before they began their migrations westwards to Europe. The cradle of the fare skinned-Caucasian race is around the area of the Caspian Sea. At the dawn of time they began their westerly migrations, founding the great Near-Eastern Civilizations of Persia, Mesopotamia, Phoenicia, and Egypt. before the much later Caucasian tribes of the North called "Aryans" entered Europe..../ Caucasians come in various skin tones, from brown to white. Their are Dark-Caucasians as in Pakistan, Olive-Caucasians as in the Southern Middle-East and North-Africa, White-Caucasians as in the Northern Middle-East and Europe, and Teutonic-Caucasians in Northern Europe and Scandinavia. Caucasians are NOT the off-shoots of the African-Negro Race, but rather of the Asian-Indian Race !!! It would be better to destinguish between all the major races, by their Facial-Features and hair types/texture, rather then by concentrating on their skin tone alone,(which can be misleading for most). AFRICAN-NEGROID VS' ASIAN-INDIAN . whom do the Caucasians resemble more ??

Since: Feb 07

Fort Myers, FL

#3 Feb 10, 2007
New Identity wrote:
White-Caucasians are the Light Skinned off-shoots of Asian-Indians, and NOT the off-shoots of Negroid-Africans !!! Caucasians were in Asia long before they began their migrations westwards to Europe. The cradle of the fare skinned-Caucasian race is around the area of the Caspian Sea. At the dawn of time they began their westerly migrations, founding the great Near-Eastern Civilizations of Persia, Mesopotamia, Phoenicia, and Egypt. before the much later Caucasian tribes of the North called "Aryans" entered Europe..../ Caucasians come in various skin tones, from brown to white. Their are Dark-Caucasians as in Pakistan, Olive-Caucasians as in the Southern Middle-East and North-Africa, White-Caucasians as in the Northern Middle-East and Europe, and Teutonic-Caucasians in Northern Europe and Scandinavia. Caucasians are NOT the off-shoots of the African-Negro Race, but rather of the Asian-Indian Race !!! It would be better to destinguish between all the major races, by their Facial-Features and hair types/texture, rather then by concentrating on their skin tone alone,(which can be misleading for most). AFRICAN-NEGROID VS' ASIAN-INDIAN . whom do the Caucasians resemble more ??
Sources to your babbling please.
New Identity

Toronto, Canada

#4 Feb 10, 2007
New Identity

Toronto, Canada

#5 Feb 10, 2007
I'm leaving this forum because the Black-Supremacy, and Herritage-Thieves took over.
Ashley

Denver, CO

#6 Feb 10, 2007
New Identity wrote:
www.phoenicia.org
Is that the only source you have? You've been posting this same source in various other threads. It's like a scientist being able to prove a "theory"....you first must back up your statements with VARIOUS sources. Lets have them please. And I'd like to see an actual CAUCASIAN come into this thread and back this up as well.
Student86

Menlo Park, CA

#7 Feb 10, 2007
What is the point of this thread again...
Ashley

Denver, CO

#8 Feb 10, 2007
Student86 wrote:
What is the point of this thread again...
Don't mind the poster....as you will soon come to notice, too,....that he replies mostly to himself because not many people like to respond to his threads/directly to him. He's just this biracial guy, filipino/German who's confused about what to call himself. THAT, my dear, is the point of this thread. He's simply lost and want to drag everyone else down with him, so it seems.
Yitzchakera

United States

#9 Feb 11, 2007
New Identity wrote:
White-Caucasians are the Light Skinned off-shoots of Asian-Indians, and NOT the off-shoots of Negroid-Africans !!! Caucasians were in Asia long before they began their migrations westwards to Europe. The cradle of the fare skinned-Caucasian race is around the area of the Caspian Sea. At the dawn of time they began their westerly migrations, founding the great Near-Eastern Civilizations of Persia, Mesopotamia, Phoenicia, and Egypt. before the much later Caucasian tribes of the North called "Aryans" entered Europe..../ Caucasians come in various skin tones, from brown to white. Their are Dark-Caucasians as in Pakistan, Olive-Caucasians as in the Southern Middle-East and North-Africa, White-Caucasians as in the Northern Middle-East and Europe, and Teutonic-Caucasians in Northern Europe and Scandinavia. Caucasians are NOT the off-shoots of the African-Negro Race, but rather of the Asian-Indian Race !!! It would be better to destinguish between all the major races, by their Facial-Features and hair types/texture, rather then by concentrating on their skin tone alone,(which can be misleading for most). AFRICAN-NEGROID VS' ASIAN-INDIAN . whom do the Caucasians resemble more ??
I have something to add to your theory. All dog species came from Asian wolves, according to people who study dog genes. Since people domesticated dogs poeple are probably atleast part responsible for bringing Dogs all around the world. Since blonde people make up 1.8% of the world it is not too hard to believe that the recessive trait did not come first, because if the recessive trait was more common it would ensure that they were more likely to be the ancestors since recessive traits themselves are more likely to occur. This is why it is unlikely that a race that only makes up 20% of the world and is so dominant would be the first humans. Also, in Korea, there was libraries long before Europeans had even comprised books.
skittles

Toronto, Canada

#10 Feb 12, 2007
Yitzchakera wrote:
<quoted text>
I have something to add to your theory. All dog species came from Asian wolves, according to people who study dog genes. Since people domesticated dogs poeple are probably atleast part responsible for bringing Dogs all around the world. Since blonde people make up 1.8% of the world it is not too hard to believe that the recessive trait did not come first, because if the recessive trait was more common it would ensure that they were more likely to be the ancestors since recessive traits themselves are more likely to occur. This is why it is unlikely that a race that only makes up 20% of the world and is so dominant would be the first humans. Also, in Korea, there was libraries long before Europeans had even comprised books.
Hey Chakera !!! How you doing ??? I'm still keeping-up the good fight on both fronts, against the White-Supremacists on the one front and the Black-Supremacists on the other. You watch how i'm going to put The Greater Indian-Race on the map. and put the above two to shame, for their UNhumble theories.
Yitzchakera

United States

#11 Feb 12, 2007
skittles wrote:
<quoted text> Hey Chakera !!! How you doing ??? I'm still keeping-up the good fight on both fronts, against the White-Supremacists on the one front and the Black-Supremacists on the other. You watch how i'm going to put The Greater Indian-Race on the map. and put the above two to shame, for their UNhumble theories.
ok, are you New Identity? Skittles, what is that all about haha. I am ok, I missed you.
Yitzchakera

United States

#14 Feb 13, 2007
does anyone know what skittles means
Ashley

Denver, CO

#15 Feb 13, 2007
Yitzchakera wrote:
does anyone know what skittles means
As soon as your little noneducated friend can answer MY questions, then I'll let you know what it means. He'll tell you anyway though....it's the name that I gave him, practically.
Ashley

Denver, CO

#16 Feb 13, 2007
^^^^^^ What I TRULY meant by that, calling numbnuts "skittles."
skittles

Toronto, Canada

#17 Feb 13, 2007
Yitzchakera wrote:
does anyone know what skittles means
Hi Chakera, do you think i should change my name to "MULATTO-RACIAL" for this Forum ???
Yitzchakera

United States

#19 Feb 13, 2007
skittles wrote:
<quoted text> Hi Chakera, do you think i should change my name to "MULATTO-RACIAL" for this Forum ???
sure, skittles is my favorite, Skittles are tasty like you. I want to know what you look like. Tell me what you look like.
New Identity

Toronto, Canada

#20 Feb 14, 2007
Yitzchakera wrote:
<quoted text>
sure, skittles is my favorite, Skittles are tasty like you. I want to know what you look like. Tell me what you look like.
Chakera, It doesen't matter to me what you look like, cause I love you anyways, starting from your soul and working my way outwards.

“Straight up!”

Since: Jan 07

Oakland California

#21 Feb 14, 2007
New Identity wrote:
White-Caucasians are the Light Skinned off-shoots of Asian-Indians, and NOT the off-shoots of Negroid-Africans !!! Caucasians were in Asia long before they began their migrations westwards to Europe. The cradle of the fare skinned-Caucasian race is around the area of the Caspian Sea. At the dawn of time they began their westerly migrations, founding the great Near-Eastern Civilizations of Persia, Mesopotamia, Phoenicia, and Egypt. before the much later Caucasian tribes of the North called "Aryans" entered Europe..../ Caucasians come in various skin tones, from brown to white. Their are Dark-Caucasians as in Pakistan, Olive-Caucasians as in the Southern Middle-East and North-Africa, White-Caucasians as in the Northern Middle-East and Europe, and Teutonic-Caucasians in Northern Europe and Scandinavia. Caucasians are NOT the off-shoots of the African-Negro Race, but rather of the Asian-Indian Race !!! It would be better to destinguish between all the major races, by their Facial-Features and hair types/texture, rather then by concentrating on their skin tone alone,(which can be misleading for most). AFRICAN-NEGROID VS' ASIAN-INDIAN . whom do the Caucasians resemble more ??
And Asians are the off shoots of Africans. White people are in fact the last on the off shoot caste.

“Straight up!”

Since: Jan 07

Oakland California

#22 Feb 14, 2007
Ashley wrote:
<quoted text>
Is that the only source you have? You've been posting this same source in various other threads. It's like a scientist being able to prove a "theory"....you first must back up your statements with VARIOUS sources. Lets have them please. And I'd like to see an actual CAUCASIAN come into this thread and back this up as well.
Ashley, he is not capable of supporting his belief in such a logical fashion. If he was, he would have been able to accept the logical fashion in which I prove my beliefs.

He is such a fraud. He doesn't call his self new Identity for nothing...LOL

“Straight up!”

Since: Jan 07

Oakland California

#23 Feb 14, 2007
Ashley wrote:
<quoted text>
He's simply lost and want to drag everyone else down with him, so it seems.
I think this topic is a retaliation to the topic I created on Melanin. He is now trying to make it look like Blacks are the inferior ones to Whites and Asians Because I clearly showed that whites are inferior to blacks and Asians because white people don't have the melanin makeup blacks an Asians have. Hey ash, check this out! This should put an end to New identity's nonsense.
The first people to inhabit Europe originated in Africa. The exact reason of their migration to Europe remains unclear, but they were most likely attracted by the availability of herds, food and shelter. A repulsive force may have been the competition between groups in the sense that groups who migrated to Europe did so because they had been chased away. There appear to have been no forms of government or other regulating institutions to interfere with migration, so that people made their own decisions about where to move. Though unfortunately we know nothing about social organisation in this period, it is likely that each group had a leader who decided on the course of action. Any decision however was heavily influenced by factors such as climate and the availability of food, limiting the freedom of choice.
"The first people to inhabit Europe originated in Africa. The exact reason of their migration to Europe remains unclear, but they were most likely attracted by the availability of herds, food and shelter. A repulsive force may have been the competition between groups in the sense that groups who migrated to Europe did so because they had been chased away. There appear to have been no forms of government or other regulating institutions to interfere with migration, so that people made their own decisions about where to move. Though unfortunately we know nothing about social organisation in this period, it is likely that each group had a leader who decided on the course of action. Any decision however was heavily influenced by factors such as climate and the availability of food, limiting the freedom of choice."
That was written by a white person.
----------
http://www.let.leidenuniv.nl/history/migratio...
All human DNA points back to Africa, not Asia
Mitochondrial Eve (mt-mrca) is the name given by researchers to the woman who is the matrilineal most recent common ancestor (MRCA) for all living humans; the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) in all living humans is derived from hers. Mitochondrial Eve is the female counterpart of the Y-chromosomal Adam, the patrilineal most recent common ancestor.
The holder of this title is believed by some to have lived about 140,000 years ago in what is now Ethiopia, Kenya or Tanzania. The time she lived is calculated based on the molecular clock technique of correlating elapsed time with observed genetic drift.
Mitochondrial Eve is the most recent common ancestor of all human via the mitochondrial DNA pathway, not the unqualified MRCA of all humanity. All living humans can trace their ancestry back to the MRCA via at least one of their parents, but Mitochondrial Eve can only be reached via the maternal line. Therefore, she necessarily lived much longer ago than the MRCA of all humanity.
The existence of Mitochondrial Eve and Y-chromosomal Adam does not imply the existence of population bottleneck or first couple. They co-existed with a large human population. Some of these contemporaries have no living descendants today, and others are ancestors of all people alive today. No contemporaries of Mitochondrial Eve is an ancestor of only a subset of people alive today, because she lived much longer ago than the identical ancestors point.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondrial_Ev...
----------
New Identity

Toronto, Canada

#24 Feb 14, 2007
Sista wrote:
<quoted text>
And Asians are the off shoots of Africans. White people are in fact the last on the off shoot caste.
The first APE-MAN were (not) Negroids, NOT NOT NOT NEGROIDS. just because the human race started in the continent of Africa, does not mean they were Negroids. The Negroids were a later Evolution. The first APE-MAN had straight hair.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 8
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Do you negros really think you are superior to ... 4 min TheDoby 2
I'm looking for a white man to please my beauti... (Apr '11) 7 min wierdos all 73
Mr. Brown 7 min TheDoby 59
Whats Wrong With Race Mixing? (Feb '10) 9 min clearly 1,980
Gabby Douglas doesn't have a white boyfriend!!! (Aug '12) 10 min Ging Freeces 33
Why do WM have all the women, power, prestige, ... 10 min Stupid Thread 76
Why do blacks claim to be the true Israelites? ... (May '11) 10 min African AE 7,653
Many HISPANICS think they're WHITE 1 hr Nat Turner 60
17 yr old Black kid lynched for dating white woman 1 hr Matthew_1 307

African-American People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE