Black African's Moors Ruled Europ...

Since: Jul 11

Round Rock, TX

#454 Aug 22, 2012
The data treated here support the idea that the Neolithic (i.e. Natufians with a clear link to Sub-Saharan Africa) moved out of the Near East into the circum-Mediterranean areas and Europe by a process of demic diffusion but that subsequently the in situ residents of those areas, derived from the Late Pleistocene inhabitants, absorbed both the agricultural life way and the people who had brought it.
C. Loring Brace: The questionable contribution of the Neolithic and the Bronze Age to European craniofacial form; PNAS | January 3, 2006 | vol. 103 | no. 1 | 242-247
There are no ancient skeletons of the Caucasian type. The findings of Brace et al make it clear that there were no whites in ancient Europe. There were only Black Africans living there until the coming of the Europeans as noted by DuBois, Diop and Boule & Vallois.
Again another piece of incontrovertible scientific evidence that the Paleolithic Europeans were Blacks. The skeletal remains of these people as noted by Boule and Vallois recalled the tropical African type.
“So striking” writes Professor Elliot Smith,“is the family likeness between the early Neolithic peoples of the British Isles and the Mediterranean and the bulk of the population, both ancient and modern, of Egypt and East Africa, that the description of the bones of an Early Briton of that remote epoch might apply in all essential details to an inhabitant of Somaliland.(The Ancient Egyptians, p. 58.)
Geneticist Peter Underhill refines the facts:
About 80 percent of Europeans arose from primitive hunters who arrived about 35,000 years ago, endured the long ice age and then expanded rapidly to dominate the continent, a new study shows.
Researchers analyzing the Y chromosome taken from 1,007 men from 25 different locations in Europe found a pattern that suggests four out of five of the men shared a common male ancestor about 40,000 years ago.
The basic pattern had some changes that apparently developed among people who once shared a common ancestor and then were isolated for many generations.
This scenario supports other studies about the Paleolithic European groups.
Those studies suggest that a primitive, stone-age human came to Europe, probably from Central Asia and the Middle East, in two waves of migration beginning about 35,000 years ago.
Their numbers were small and they lived by hunting animals and gathering plant food. They used crudely sharpened stones and fire.
“About 24,000 years ago, the last ice age began, with mountain-sized glaciers moving across most of Europe.
The Paleolithic Europeans retreated before the ice, finding refuge for hundreds of generations in three areas: what is now Spain, the Balkans and the Ukraine.
“When the glaciers melted, about 16,000 years ago, the Paleolithic tribes resettled the rest of Europe. Y chromosome mutations occurred among people in each of the ice age refuges.
About 8,000 years ago a more advanced people, the Neolithic, migrated to Europe from the Middle East, bringing with them a new Y chromosome pattern and a new way of life – My brothers: this is the rest of the article that is scientific refutation to the shamless little di(ked eurocentric loving lemon; known as Jeff and the insecure boastful shit colored beaner known as barros the "culito" Serrano. They are still throwing red herrings and commiting major fallacies by attempting to the now scientifically proved fact that these eurocentric devils are johnny come lately's. Know African's are the mother race genetically and all other races are sub races descended from us after we migrated around the world even migrating into the area they call the "middle east" which was originally still art of Africa!! lol hahahaha My brothers this information is for you all to enjoy with pride. I will no longer attempt to verify or qualify our dominat black existence with any of these trolls. lol
Jeff

Framingham, MA

#455 Aug 22, 2012
Robert Steel wrote:
The mutation gene must have spread gradually (as often occurs with new mutation) from that time but it surely would have taken another two or three thousand years down the line before it would become the dominant European profile. That makes it just three thousand years ago.
It was only three thousand years ago that whiteman became the dominant type in an African-owned Europe! Before that it was Black-skinned African. For more than 48,000 years Black-skinned Africans would have been the only Europeans!!! Europe was discovered and mapped by Black skin Africans. Europe of yesterdn analysis of their variation can serve as an indication of the extent to which any given population is genetically related to or differs from any other.
When 24 craniofacial measurements of a series of human populations are used to generate neighbor-joining dendrograms, it is no surprise that all modern European groups, ranging all of the way from Scandinavia to eastern Europe and throughout the Mediterranean to the Middle East, show that they are closely related to each other.
The surprise is that the Neolithic peoples of Europe and their Bronze Age successors are not closely related to the modern inhabitants, although the prehistoric/modern ties are somewhat more apparent in southern Europe.
It is a further surprise that the Epipalaeolithic Natufian of Israel from whom the Neolithic realm was assumed to arise has a clear link to Sub-Saharan Africa.
……………………..
You are a dumbass and an idiot. Retard, light skin Eurasians existed in cold adopted regions like Europe as far back as 30,000 years ago.'Black' Africans didn't migrate from Africa into Europe and lived as 'black' people until 5-6,000 years ago, you scientifically stupid fool. Europe is a cold adopted region. In prehistoric times cold adopted climates were typically better suited for light skinned humans not blacks, hence why most dark skinned humans lived and continue to live in tropical climates, stupid. Those earliest homosapien types were already living in Eurasian cold adopted climates long before they migrated into Europe so their phenotypes and genetics evolved to NONE African types long before they migrated into Europe. The earliest homosapien types to migrate into Europe were Cro-Magnon haplogroup I carriers, Haplogroup I is a European marker, common among Europeans and NOT common among Africans. These early Cro-Magnon migrants weren't African nor where they black but Eurasian types who migrated from West Asia and they have the greatest resemblance to Europeans and Near Eastern people.

"The Cro-Magnons had long, fairly low skulls, with wide faces, prominent noses, and moderate to no prognathism, similar to the features seen in modern Europeans."

“The fact that the hunter-gatherers [Cro Magnon types] are most similar to Finns, Orcadians, and other extreme-northern populations suggests that they were indeed a major part of the Mesolithic meta-population that populated large parts of Europe." ~ Science: Stone Age Skeletons of Europe

Neolithic peoples of Europe = European & Near Eastern
Oetzi Man's admixture = European & Near Eastern
1.05% Palaeoafrican
43.94% Atlantic_Baltic
0.00% Northeast_Asian
51.52% Near_East
1.54% Sub_Saharan
0.00% South_Asian
1.95% Southeast_Asian

Also the marker for lighting skin among Europeans you are talking about, threonine allele p.A111T in the SLC24A5 (rs1426654) gene, is one of SEVERAL that played a role in the various skin pigmentation among Europeans and it arose among Eurasian people nearly 12,000 years ago stupid. The SLC24A5 111*A (rs1426654) is ONE of multiple GENES responsible for European skin pigmentations. There is also TYR 192*A (rs1042602) gene as well as the MATP 374*G (rs16891982) gene to name a few others.
Jeff

Natick, MA

#456 Aug 22, 2012
Robert Steel wrote:
Tomy dynamic and incredible brothers;Sly steel, bon, troll slayer and secret visitor; Much love, respect and continued encouragemen to you men as we continue to own these hateful and despicable manifestations of Set and Apep Apophis. these last three posts are are excerpts from a scientific journal accomplished by a board of white scientists(traitors to the savge cause) who East Africa, that the description of the bones of an Early Briton of that remote epoch might apply in all essential details to an inhabitant of Somaliland.(The Ancient Egyptians, p. 58.)
Geneticist Peter Underhill refines the facts:
About 80 percent of Europeans arose from primitive hunters who arrived aboutin each of the ice age refuges.
About 8,000 years ago a more advanced people, the Neolithic, migrated to Europe from the Middle East, bringing with them a new Y chromosome pattern and a new way of life – agriculture. About 20 percent of Europeans now have the Y chromosome pattern from this migration [African Y chromosome E3b and SouthWest Asian J].
Again Self Hating Asswipe The earliest homosapien types to migrate into Europe were Cro-Magnon haplogroup I carriers, Haplogroup I is a European marker, common among Europeans and NOT common among Africans. These early Cro-Magnon migrants weren't African nor where they black but Eurasian types who migrated from West Asia and they have the greatest resemblance to Europeans and Near Eastern people. Europe is a cold adopted region. In prehistoric times cold adopted climates were typically better suited for light skinned humans not blacks, hence why most dark skinned humans lived and continue to live in tropical climates, stupid. Those earliest homosapien types were already living in Eurasian cold adopted climates long before they migrated into Europe so their phenotypes and genetics evolved to NONE African types long before they migrated into Europe.

"For many European and Asian individuals, variant MC1R alleles contribute to both lighter skin color and sun sensitivity. These estimates suggest that the MC1R variants Val60Leu, Val92Met, and Arg163Gln may trace back to ancestors in Eurasian populations existing 250,000–100,000 years ago. Our estimates of 80,000 years for the Arg151Cys and Arg160Trp variants likewise suggest a distant ancestral contribution from Paleolithic Eurasians to the Eurasian populations of today. Our estimated age of 80,000 years for the variants suggests that they are likely to have a wide geographic distribution, perhaps extending into central Asia. This prediction is easily testable with data from other surveys of MC1R variation." ~ Harding et al.

"On the basis of its spread and variation that the mutation arose between 20,000 and 50,000 years ago. That would be consistent with research showing that a wave of ancestral humans migrated northward and eastward out of Africa about 50,000 years ago. Unlike most mutations, this one quickly overwhelmed its ancestral version, at least in Europe, suggesting it had a real benefit. Many scientists suspect that benefit has to do with vitamin D, made in the body with the help of sunlight and critical to proper bone development."

"The generally small differences found between observed and expected values for skin coloration appear to reflect differences between populations in duration of habitation in their respective areas. Populations believed to have inhabited their current area of distribution for 20,000 years (e.g., Iberian Basques) conform most closely to predicted values for skin reflectance. Those which are thought to have migrated into their current locations more recently (e.g., Aboriginal Australians from Darwin who are migrants from the Central Desert) conform less closely to predicted values." ~ Jablonski et al.

Since: Jul 11

Round Rock, TX

#457 Aug 22, 2012
One point to keep in my mind my brothers is that this is not a battle of black nazi's;blacks who want to kill all whites battling against white people who just want to show us the "error" of our ways.
This is about the worldwide insidious system of "white supremecy" no matter how it may come diguised.

The people at the very highest levels who actually fund these "scientist" and "archeologists" are "white supremicist" themselves.

So it should come as no suprise that for every independent scientific research study, showing who we are, there will be 1-3 popping up saying that the evidence shows these people were white! lol It doesn't matter if the people show murals with men and women so "black" that you can only see their eyes and noses thick and wide with lips like jj evans on "good times" They have burned tons of evidence proving who we are and still can't hide the truth.

These idiots are going to claim them as white. They will do this by playing around with "DNA structures" and "genetic markers" claiming that no the people really were eurasion and caucasion.

An entire language has been created to give europeans an identity when it is clear that they have only recently come into existence on the planet. They will even claim connection to neanderthalls and cromagnons rather than admit they are simply an insignificant recent mutation. lol what idiots.

The real research that shows who we are is usually not even funded by the highest ranking white supremicist.

They found out who we were hundreds of years ago that's one of the many reasons that they fear us.The research that I just presented is already being battled against because it proves white supremecy to be the ignorant lie that it is.

That is why I will again mention to you that you have to look at the reality and common sense of it.

These are men going out of their way to argue that "jet black" people with "thick lips" are not "black"

That "whites" who have been scientifically proven to be genetically "weaker" and "genetically" proven to have way more "mutations" in their make up are somehow supposed to be have been on the planet longer than us African's. lol

Simply ludricous!!
Men that are looking for black sites to argue with blacks about their origins! The very thought of it is retarded! If you screw a white girl everyone's calling the kid black because they're weaker than us and they know it.
If you invented a working time machine and took these jack asses back in time to the origins of Africa and put them on ships with west africans traveling to mexico they would deny the truth and want to disect one of the africans and then falsely label them a caucasion.

This is not about proof with white suupremicist and it never has even in slavery time days they hated us for being their ancestors and having a rich culture when they had no indigenous culture of sophistication and they still dont.

They just have a hodge podge of other cultures.lol

Even their comic book heroes are adaptions of black god's and godessess. lol they sure love to vulture other's cultures as even they vulture our words from other sites and then use them against us.

None of them have the gonads to walk up to any strong black man and challenge him so they found their haven a device that allows them to talk shit from the safety of their homes.lol
They have always been weaker than us,(Spiritually, Mentally, emotionally and physically) scared of us ,perverts and sissy's and jealus of the fact that their women want us. lol So from now on don't even engage them because it is their desire to drag us down into the mud with them talking all kinds of talk that is nothing other than duisguised racism. I have thouroughly destroyed them with logic in debate and science I will no longer waste anymore time talking to these intellectually and genetically inferior scum bags. Shalom and Hotep to my kingly brothers!!!
Barros Serrano

Reserve, NM

#458 Aug 22, 2012
Oh here we go again with long meaningless posts revealing only an abject ignorance of science. The mofo wasn't on for a few hours... must have been at the tanning salon...

These Afronazi self-haters are so upset... all the evidence makes them feel inferior...

1. oldest known civilization was in India
2. civilization in SE Europe older than Egypt
3. earliest known writing in Europe
4. NO art anywhere as early as that of the European caves can compare with them
5. now known that W-Central Africans are part Homo heidelbergensis
6. Eurasian ancestors were in Arabia by 125K yrs ago, meaning,
7. L2 likely arose in Arabia, not Africa
8. Afroasiatic languages, according to most evidence, arose in Mideast, not Africa
9. the Maghreb for 30,000 years has been predominantly Eurasian
10. African-Americans are closer by far to white Yanks than to any other ethnic group, by far, and vice-versa, speaking culturally. This explains why white and black Yanks have so many similar, and annoying, traits, compared to Europeans and Africans who still have some culture left
11. Afronazis punked & debunked EVERY TIME, revealing their lack of proper education and their cultish racist self-hating obsessions with being something other than what they are

Yes, it's pathetic...

“Africa”

Level 7

Since: Jan 12

Oakland

#459 Aug 22, 2012
troll patrol wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, I suppose if they were it would hurt your feelings wouldn't it? Can't have that.
P.s. You use commas where they do not belong. Learn proper grammar before you try to teach us about our history .
Yes, I suppose if they weren't it would hurt your feelings, wouldn't it?

P.s. You reworded my sentence, thereby altering its meaning. This "revised" meaning is not only contrary to the original meaning, but it renders the sentence out of place in context of the preceding dialog. In essence, in your edit you misquoted me and in a way that completely alters the whole point of the sentence being stated. In addition, you extracted two commas when only one was extraneous and was not corrected because Topix does not allow for editing of posts. I guess you didn't realize that the phrase "wouldn't it" qualifies as an independent clause amd thus warrants a comma, huh?

Learn how to properly proofread before you enact yet another laughably impotent attempt at pedantry. Once you manage that, try to assemble an argument that actually addresses my points made and questions asked in my earlier post...if you can.

Level 1

Since: Aug 12

United States

#460 Aug 23, 2012
Jeff wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh look I hit a nerve cause I exposed 'Robert Steelgass' for the fraud that he is. lol! "Rober Steel" is a freaken socketpuppet who is posting under various fake usernames including 'sly steel' and creating dumb threads like this. Dumbass also has a proxie server that at one time had him posting from Washington, DC. He stupidly is trying to pass himself as 'educated' but he is lying about that as much as he lied about the fact that he was 'married' to a black woman and claiming he is a 'loving black good husband' but was trolling the boards for hook ups with White and Latino women. Guess his pissed cause none of them gave his dumbass a second glance so he started this retarded thread. lol!
sorry crackkker you goofed ,i am sly steel you albino orangutan
Barros Serrano

Reserve, NM

#462 Aug 23, 2012
This all reveals an essential truth about Afronazis... it's a SCAM! Look at the BS being spewed... jackasses who all suddenly appeared in response to the link to the Coe & Coe article proving the Native origin of the Olmecs...

And what are they arguing? Black Europe, lol. Ethnic slurs. Utter BS. I think half of this garbage is quoted from Clyde Winters, as I'm reading a lot of Clydisms here...

LOL... they have to maintain their game, of conning uneducated and gullible young blacks into buying their books, lol..

That's what it's about. Getting Afronazi fake scholars speaking engagements and attention.

This game is no more respectable than Jerry Falwell begging for money on TV.
Jeff

Framingham, MA

#463 Aug 23, 2012
Barros Serrano wrote:
This all reveals an essential truth about Afronazis... it's a SCAM! Look at the BS being spewed... jackasses who all suddenly appeared in response to the link to the Coe & Coe article proving the Native origin of the Olmecs...
And what are they arguing? Black Europe, lol. Ethnic slurs. Utter BS. I think half of this garbage is quoted from Clyde Winters, as I'm reading a lot of Clydisms here...
LOL... they have to maintain their game, of conning uneducated and gullible young blacks into buying their books, lol..
That's what it's about. Getting Afronazi fake scholars speaking engagements and attention.
This game is no more respectable than Jerry Falwell begging for money on TV.
The c rap posted by socketpuppet 'Robert Steel' is from just as bad an Afrocentric garbage site. It come straight from those clowns over at www.africaresource.com/rasta . lol!
Bon

Torrance, CA

#465 Aug 24, 2012
These re some cool white people:

http://www.global-dvc.org/proboscis%20monkey....
Bon

Torrance, CA

#467 Aug 24, 2012
Robert Steel wrote:
So it should come as no suprise that for every independent scientific research study, showing who we are, there will be 1-3 popping up saying that the evidence shows these people were white! lol It doesn't matter if the people show murals with men and women so "black" that you can only see their eyes and noses thick and wide with lips like jj evans on "good times" They have burned tons of evidence proving who we are and still can't hide the truth.

Hahaaaaa....did you really expect them to admit to the facts? Not possible. That's the only way they can continue to survive....hiding behind the truth.

These idiots are going to claim them as white. They will do this by playing around with "DNA structures" and "genetic markers" claiming that no the people really were eurasion and caucasion.
An entire language has been created to give europeans an identity when it is clear that they have only recently come into existence on the planet. They will even claim connection to neanderthalls and cromagnons rather than admit they are simply an insignificant recent mutation. lol what idiots.

Once a thief.....always a thief.

The real research that shows who we are is usually not even funded by the highest ranking white supremicist.

After plundering and robbing from every other nation on earth they boast about wealth SMH.

They found out who we were hundreds of years ago that's one of the many reasons that they fear us.The research that I just presented is already being battled against because it proves white supremecy to be the ignorant lie that it is.
These are men going out of their way to argue that "jet black" people with "thick lips" are not "black"

Hahahaaaaaaaa...If the Olmecs were notorious robbers they would have been referred to as 'Blacks' by white mutants.

That "whites" who have been scientifically proven to be genetically "weaker" and "genetically" proven to have way more "mutations" in their make up are somehow supposed to be have been on the planet longer than us African's. lol
Simply ludricous!!

If you invented a working time machine and took these jack asses back in time to the origins of Africa and put them on ships with west africans traveling to mexico they would deny the truth and want to disect one of the africans and then falsely label them a caucasion.

Hahaaaaaaaaaaaaaa....funny but true.

They just have a hodge podge of other cultures.lol
Even their comic book heroes are adaptions of black god's and godessess. lol they sure love to vulture other's cultures as even they vulture our words from other sites and then use them against us. I have thouroughly destroyed them with logic in debate and science (yes you thoroughly did) I will no longer waste anymore time talking to these intellectually and genetically inferior scum bags. Shalom and Hotep to my kingly brothers!!!


Understand your waning interest in trying to get through their thick skulls as they are thoroughly brained washed. There isonly so much you can do.
Bon

Torrance, CA

#468 Aug 24, 2012
STRANGEVISITOR72 wrote:
<quoted text>
LOVE IT!!!!
Thanks to you.

Since: Jul 11

San Antonio, TX

#471 Aug 24, 2012
Retard, light skin Eurasians existed in cold adopted regions like Europe as far back as 30,000 years ago.'Black' Africans didn't migrate from Africa into Europe and lived as 'black' people until 5-6,000 years ago, you scientifically stupid fool. Europe is a cold adopted region. In prehistoric times cold adopted climates were typically better suited for light skinned humans not blacks, hence why most dark skinned humans lived and continue to live in tropical climates, stupid. Those earliest homosapien types were already living in Eurasian cold adopted climates long before they migrated into Europe so their phenotypes and genetics evolved to NONE African types long before they migrated into Europe. The earliest homosapien types to migrate into Europe were Cro-Magnon haplogroup I carriers, Haplogroup I is a European marker, common among Europeans and NOT common among Africans. These early Cro-Magnon migrants weren't African nor where they black but Eurasian types who migrated from West Asia and they have the greatest resemblance to Europeans and Near Eastern people.Jeff’s quote; “Also the threonine allele p.A111T in the SLC24A5 (rs1426654) gene, is one of SEVERAL that played a role in the various skin pigmentation among Europeans and it arose among Eurasian people nearly 12,000 years ago stupid.”
My response; The threonine allele p.A111T in the SLC24A5(rs1426654) gene being one of several that played a role among Europeans and you say it arose among European People nearly 12,000 years ago.
Well first off according to the scientific testing done it was African’s who migrated from Africa 50,000 years ago into Europe and approximately 45-46,000 years later- the modern European as labeled as “white” came into existence.
My response; whether, the gene arose 12,000 years ago you -“dumb ass, chinky eyed Eurocentric tool” has nothing to do with whether the gene was fully activated jackass. That just means “possibly” that activation of the “SLC24A5”(rs1426654) gene had began its “lightening process” and then continued for 7,000 more years until the completion of the “mutation” of the original black African -DNA occurred.
Jeff’s quote; SLC24A5 111*A (rs1426654) is ONE of multiple GENES responsible for European skin pigmentations. There is also TYR 192*A (rs1042602) gene as well as the MATP 374*G (rs16891982) gene to name a few others. You were West Africans, you were NOT Greeks - they You were West Africans, you were NOT Greeks - they were white Europeans, you were not Olmec or Native Americans, you were not Summerican, Hebrew etc they were Middle Eastern, and neither were you Asians, dumbass.
My response; You are just repeating your same illogical and irrelevant statements that you have thrown out like a “red herring” fallacy to confuse the issue; being that the threonine allele p.A111T in the SLC24A5 (rs1426654) gene, is one of SEVERAL that played a role in the various skin pigmentation among Europeans and it arose among Eurasian people nearly 12,000 years ago.” Let me repeat myself to you then you weak and mentally- degenerate lemon, since repetition seems to be one of the main ways that the myopic and abysmally dark cave, that you attempt to pass of as a brain functions. The amount of other genes have no significant relevance in logically disputing the fact that it has been proven that SLC24A5 111*A (RS 16891982) is responsible for skin lightening in Europeans.
Barros Serrano

Reserve, NM

#473 Aug 24, 2012
STRANGEVISITOR72 wrote:
<quoted text>
NO ONE HAS ALL THE ANSWERS NEW SHIT IS UNCOVERED ALL THE TIME:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/articl...
That doesn't mean you can dismiss valid evidence which already is known, nor believe any wacko racist-ideology-inspired BS and pretend its valid or legitimate.

Your racist beliefs are on the level of the beliefs of a cult.
Barros Serrano

Reserve, NM

#475 Aug 24, 2012
Robert Steel wrote:
Retard, light skin Eurasians existed in cold adopted regions like Europe as far back as 30,000 years ago.'Black' Africans didn't migrate from Africa into Europe and lived as 'black' people until 5-6,000 years ago, you scientifically stupid fool. Europe is a cold adopted region. In prehistoric times cold adopted climates were typically better suited for light skinned humans not blacks, hence why most dark skinned humans lived and continue to live in tropical climates, stupid. Those earliest homosapien types were already living in Eurasian cold adopted climates long before they migrated into Europe so their phenotypes and genetics evolved to NONE African types long before they migrated into Europe. The earliest homosapien types to migrate into Europe were Cro-Magnon haplogroup I carriers, Haplogroup I is a European marker, common among Europeans and NOT common among Africans. These early Cro-Magnon migrants weren't African nor where they black but Eurasian types who migrated from West Asia and they have the greatest resemblance to Europeans and Near Eastern people.Jeff’s quote; “Also the threonine allele p.A111T in the SLC24A5 (rs1426654) gene, is one of SEVERAL that played a role in the various skin pigmentation among Europeans and it arose among Eurasian people nearly 12,000 years ago stupid.”
My response; The threonine allele p.A111T in the SLC24A5(rs1426654) gene being one of several that played a role among Europeans and you say it arose among European People nearly 12,000 years ago.
Well first off according to the scientific testing done it was African’s who migrated from Africa 50,000 years ago into Europe and approximately 45-46,000 years later- the modern European as labeled as “white” came into existence.
My response; whether, the gene arose 12,000 years ago you -“dumb ass, chinky eyed Eurocentric tool” has nothing to do with whether the gene was fully activated jackass. That just means “possibly” that activation of the “SLC24A5”(rs1426654) gene had began its “lightening process” and then continued for 7,000 more years until the completion of the “mutation” of the original black African -DNA occurred.
Jeff’s quote; SLC24A5 111*A (rs1426654) is ONE of multiple GENES responsible for European skin pigmentations. There is also TYR 192*A (rs1042602) gene as well as the MATP 374*G (rs16891982) gene to name a few others. You were West Africans, you were NOT Greeks - they You were West Africans, you were NOT Greeks - they were white Europeans, you were not Olmec or Native Americans, you were not Summerican, Hebrew etc they were Middle Eastern, and neither were you Asians, dumbass.
My response; You are just repeating your same illogical and irrelevant statements that you have thrown out like a “red herring” fallacy to confuse the issue; being that the threonine allele p.A111T in the SLC24A5 (rs1426654) gene, is one of SEVERAL that played a role in the various skin pigmentation among Europeans and it arose among Eurasian people nearly 12,000 years ago.” Let me repeat myself to you then you weak and mentally- degenerate lemon, since repetition seems to be one of the main ways that the myopic and abysmally dark cave, that you attempt to pass of as a brain functions. The amount of other genes have no significant relevance in logically disputing the fact that it has been proven that SLC24A5 111*A (RS 16891982) is responsible for skin lightening in Europeans.
Did it take you a day for Clyde to paste this $hit together for you, Suntan Boy?

Your info is wrong.“Scientific studies” means what exactly?And they do not show migration from Africa straight into Europe. The migrants had been in Eurasia a long time, and had adapted. Jeff has already posted various info confirming that paleness is very old.

And since you deteriorate into nothing but racist invective rather than even attempting to discuss evidence, come see me, boy, I'll silence your racist spew, whitey.

You worthless sociopathic coward.
Jeff

Natick, MA

#476 Aug 24, 2012
Robert Steel wrote:
My response; The threonine allele p.A111T in the SLC24A5(rs1426654) gene being one of several that played a role among Europeans and you say it arose among European People nearly 12,000 years ago.
Well first off according to the scientific testing done it was African’s who migrated from Africa 50,000 years ago into Europe and approximately 45-46,000 years later- the modern European as labeled as “white” came into existence.
My response; whether, the gene arose 12,000 years ago you -“dumb ass, chinky eyed Eurocentric tool” has nothing to do with whether the gene was fully activated jackass. That just means “possibly” that activation of the “SLC24A5”(rs1426654) gene had began its “lightening process” and then continued for 7,000 more years until the completion of the “mutation” of the original black African -DNA occurred.
My response; You are just repeating your same illogical and irrelevant statements that you have thrown out like a “red herring” fallacy to confuse the issue; being that the threonine allele p.A111T in the SLC24A5 (rs1426654) gene, is one of SEVERAL that played a role in the various skin pigmentation among Europeans and it arose among Eurasian people nearly 12,000 years ago.” Let me repeat myself to you then you weak and mentally- degenerate lemon, since repetition seems to be one of the main ways that the myopic and abysmally dark cave, that you attempt to pass of as a brain functions. The amount of other genes have no significant relevance in logically disputing the fact that it has been proven that SLC24A5 111*A (RS 16891982) is responsible for skin lightening in Europeans.
Stop lying, you socketpuppet fraud, no scientific testing has shown that it was Africans who migrated from Africa into Europe nearly 50,000 years ago because it was EURASIAN types from West Asia who migrated into Europe nearly 45-46,000 years ago. Europe is a cold adopted region. In prehistoric times cold adopted climates were typically better suited for light skinned humans not blacks, hence why most dark skinned humans lived and continue to live in tropical climates, while light skinned humans lived and continue to live in cold adopted regions. Those earliest homosapien types were already living in Eurasian cold adopted climates long before they migrated into Europe so their phenotypes and genetics evolved to NONE African types long before they migrated into Europe. The earliest homosapien types to migrate into Europe were Cro-Magnon haplogroup I carriers, Haplogroup I is a European marker, common among Europeans and NOT common among Africans. These early Cro-Magnon migrants weren't African nor where they black but Eurasian types who migrated from West Asia and they have the greatest resemblance to Europeans and Near Eastern people. The fact that you don't know that SLC24A5 111*A (rs1426654) is ONE of multiple GENES responsible for European skin pigmentations only shows how much of an uneducated mucus brain you are. There is also TYR 192*A (rs1042602) gene as well as the MATP 374*G (rs16891982) gene to name a few others.
Barros Serrano

Reserve, NM

#477 Aug 24, 2012
Get with the current evidence, Afronazi dumbasses.

Homo sapiens is now known to have been in Arabia 125K yrs ago. In addition, mtDNA groups M and N are proven to have arisen in Arabia.

What has been called “out-of-Africa” may in fact have been “out-of-Arabia”, as it was from Arabia that the dispersal of Eurasians began.

Since 125K yrs ago is far earlier than the appearance of L3, the parent of M and N, it is now considered quite possible that L3 also arose in Arabia and back-migrated into Africa.

Skin color is a trivial trait, changing via evolution relatively quickly. We can be sure that light-colored people have been around for a LONG time.

Afronazis also have a fit over the fact that DARKER peoples in several cases evolved from lighter ones. Quite likely this is true even for W-Central Africans, though of course there is the possibility they got their darker color from Homo heidelbergensis who already lived in those regions, and with whom the W-Central Africans interbred.

Since: Jul 11

San Antonio, TX

#478 Aug 24, 2012
Jeff wrote:
<quoted text>
You are a dumbass and an idiot. Retard, light skin Eurasians existed in cold adopted regions like Europe as far back as 30,000 years ago.'Black' Africans didn't migrate from Africa into Europe and lived as 'black' people until 5-6,000 years ago, you scientifically stupid fool. Europe is a cold adopted region. In prehistoric times cold adopted climates were typically better suited for light skinned humans not blacks, hence why most dark skinned humans lived and continue to live in tropical climates, stupid. Those earliest homosapien types were already living in Eurasian cold adopted climates long before they migrated into Europe so their phenotypes and genetics evolved to NONE African types long before they migrated into Europe. The earliest homosapien types to migrate into Europe were Cro-Magnon haplogroup I carriers, Haplogroup I is a European marker, common among Europeans and NOT common among Africans. These early Cro-Magnon migrants weren't African nor where they black but Eurasian types who migrated from West Asia and they have the greatest resemblance to Europeans and Near Eastern people.
"The Cro-Magnons had long, fairly low skulls, with wide faces, prominent noses, and moderate to no prognathism, similar to the features seen in modern Europeans."
“The fact that the hunter-gatherers [Cro Magnon types] are most similar to Finns, Orcadians, and other extreme-northern populations suggests that they were indeed a major part of the Mesolithic meta-population that populated large parts of Europe." ~ Science: Stone Age Skeletons of Europe
Neolithic peoples of Europe = European & Near Eastern
Oetzi Man's admixture = European & Near Eastern
1.05% Palaeoafrican
43.94% Atlantic_Baltic
0.00% Northeast_Asian
51.52% Near_East
1.54% Sub_Saharan
0.00% South_Asian
1.95% Southeast_Asian
Also the marker for lighting skin among Europeans you are talking about, threonine allele p.A111T in the SLC24A5 (rs1426654) gene, is one of SEVERAL that played a role in the various skin pigmentation among Europeans and it arose among Eurasian people nearly 12,000 years ago stupid. The SLC24A5 111*A (rs1426654) is ONE of multiple GENES responsible for European skin pigmentations. There is also TYR 192*A (rs1042602) gene as well as the MATP 374*G (rs16891982) gene to name a few others.
Whether you mention other markers or not lightening europeans has no significance on whether the slc24a5 was responsible for lightening whites 5-6,000 years ago. The rest of your incoherent babble is a nothing other than smokescreens.

These smokescreens that you ineptly throw out there mentioning lots of other genetic markers being involved has nothing to do with negating the potency of the fact that SLC24A5 was still responsible for lightening the migrating group from Africa that came into Europe 50,000 years ago.

Of course "eugenics" is to incorrectly label the timeline of OOA(out of africa) migrations because it will clarify for the world that you and caucasions descended from very early populations of Africans who migrated into various countries world wide. Cromagnons cannot be proved conclusively(beyond the shadow of a doubt) to be the ancestors of homosapiens. That is just speculative science. However, it has been proven conclusively that whites are not only genetically weaker than blacks and contain many harmful mutations but that Africans actually did migrate into europe and the SlC24A5 gene was in part responsible for the lightening process of true human beings(homosapiens)not ceromagnons and other subspecies of beings walking around.
Newpid Stiggers

UK

#479 Aug 24, 2012
"If you invented a working time machine and took these jack asses back in time to the origins of Africa and put them on ships with west africans traveling to mexico they would deny the truth and want to disect one of the africans and then falsely label them a caucasion."

WEST AFRICANS TRAVELLING TO MEXICO! what utter crap. If these people actually studied something real, perhaps they could get jobs.

Blacks never built sea going ships.
No evidence of ANY kind at all
No written history, negroes never invented writing
No DNA evidence of any blacks EVER in Mexico before Europeans took them there.
Blacks never built anything other than small boats.
They prove they are stupid by dreaming up silly stories like this.

Since: Jul 11

San Antonio, TX

#481 Aug 24, 2012
Jeff wrote:
<quoted text>
Stop lying, you socketpuppet fraud, no scientific testing has shown that it was Africans who migrated from Africa into Europe nearly 50,000 years ago because it was EURASIAN types from West Asia who migrated into Europe nearly 45-46,000 years ago. Europe is a cold adopted region. In prehistoric times cold adopted climates were typically better suited for light skinned humans not blacks, hence why most dark skinned humans lived and continue to live in tropical climates, while light skinned humans lived and continue to live in cold adopted regions. Those earliest homosapien types were already living in Eurasian cold adopted climates long before they migrated into Europe so their phenotypes and genetics evolved to NONE African types long before they migrated into Europe. The earliest homosapien types to migrate into Europe were Cro-Magnon haplogroup I carriers, Haplogroup I is a European marker, common among Europeans and NOT common among Africans. These early Cro-Magnon migrants weren't African nor where they black but Eurasian types who migrated from West Asia and they have the greatest resemblance to Europeans and Near Eastern people. The fact that you don't know that SLC24A5 111*A (rs1426654) is ONE of multiple GENES responsible for European skin pigmentations only shows how much of an uneducated mucus brain you are. There is also TYR 192*A (rs1042602) gene as well as the MATP 374*G (rs16891982) gene to name a few others.
For your case to be effective and logically correct you pus colored self loathing breathing moving piece of excretement;you chinky eyes- have to #1)effectively prove that because there were additional genes and mutations such as albinism occuring along with the activation of SLC24A5(rs1426654)the skin whitening process did not in fact occur and cause skin whitening among Europeans. My article proved you to be lying and misinformed about that you squalid low-I.Q'd lemon.

#2)Microcephalic detestable roach that you are of the African American forums; you have to be able to prove that just because SLC24A5 might have arose 12,000 years ago activation of it's skin lightening process was fully complete 12,000 years ago

#3)prove that Cromagnons were actually the ancestors of modern white skinned Europeans. You cannot do this as no other scientist in the world prove that cromagnon's neither Neanderthals were homosapiens ancestors. A side point to mention of course is that both of these species coexisted at the same time period of homosapiens. This is why "anthropological evolution" is a speculative science.

4)You cringing and cowardly asswhipe who is pathological stupid and abysmally ignorant about science, archeology, genetics and history.#4) you have to be able to prove that the original Africans who migrated to Europe in their earliest epoch did not migrate to Europe.#5) that the cold climate in Europe is proof that the Africans who were black didn't exist there.

Refute those with posts and facts you insignificant flea like dunce that keep's clinging to the tail of lion like Africa's greart cultures.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
African American women appreciation thread. ---... 5 min Johnny 9
Egyptians in Egypt 5 min Enlightened 428
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 5 min Grey Ghost 1,275,808
100% proof --> Planned Parenthood goal is black... 16 min Barkey 5
What Jews think of African Americans. ---------- (Jan '14) 18 min Hitler II 15
Jesus had the skin of Burnt Brass (Mar '11) 22 min Whiteeeee 269
Sunday is Funday for Black Men and White Women 22 min Jared Fogle 4
Healing The Black Race... 23 min deep 340
I hate blackwomen with a passion!! 23 min Westend100 33
White men are better lovers? 26 min CinnamonPancake 483
REPARATIONS: They Will Be Paid Sooner Or Later (Jan '15) 37 min TheOriginalDoby 1,058
More from around the web