blacks owned white slaves
First Prev
of 3
Next Last
MARK

Alpharetta, GA

#1 Sep 30, 2012
HISTORY we should all know. Whites were the first SLAVES

http://www.google.com/url...
MARK

Alpharetta, GA

#4 Sep 30, 2012
Yes, I agree. Whites have been lied to. It's a shame.
Black Deal

United States

#5 Sep 30, 2012
Yeah there was white slaves and they been snatched up still and sent to Asia and Middle East by wicked folks

http://www.revisionisthistory.org/forgottensl...

http://www.africaresource.com/rasta/sesostris...

Them white mfs was slaves not just black folks
Budju

Adelaide, Australia

#6 Sep 30, 2012
everyone in US is a slave for the money
Mickey

United States

#7 Sep 30, 2012
Where beez our reprayshunz?

Level 8

Since: Oct 09

Paris France

#8 Oct 1, 2012
MARK wrote:
HISTORY we should all know. Whites were the first SLAVES
http://www.google.com/url...
The same old story... rather boring and naturally off topic.

Here is what your own website in reference is telling that shows the HUGE difference between slavery inflicted to Blacks, based on their skin colour, and "indentured servitude" that a few whites have been through.

"AFTER CONTRACT WAS COMPLETED: Although many masters craftily figure out ways to extend an indentured servant's bondage (through accusing the servant of stealing, impregnating a female indenture servant, etc.), most indentured servants who survived the first four to seven years in America were freed. The master was required (depending upon the rules of the colony) to provide his former servant with the following: clothing, two hoes, three barrels of corn, and fifty acres of land."

4 to 7 years okay ... pleaaaase ! cut the B.S.

a whiteboi

Level 5

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#9 Oct 1, 2012
attai1 wrote:
<quoted text>
The same old story... rather boring and naturally off topic.
Here is what your own website in reference is telling that shows the HUGE difference between slavery inflicted to Blacks, based on their skin colour, and "indentured servitude" that a few whites have been through.
"AFTER CONTRACT WAS COMPLETED: Although many masters craftily figure out ways to extend an indentured servant's bondage (through accusing the servant of stealing, impregnating a female indenture servant, etc.), most indentured servants who survived the first four to seven years in America were freed. The master was required (depending upon the rules of the colony) to provide his former servant with the following: clothing, two hoes, three barrels of corn, and fifty acres of land."
4 to 7 years okay ... pleaaaase ! cut the B.S.
a whiteboi
It wasn't all just indentured servitude.

This should be of some interest to YOU.

"When the Cajuns arrived in French Louisiana, most of the good land was already taken. Adding to their problems, they were told to get out of New Orleans. Their solution was to move to lands that were not occupied, and that were more difficult to settle. They eventually claimed lands of their own, and their numbers climbed to over 4,000 by 1790 and over 10,000 by 1810. Since the Acadians were being persecuted and sold into slavery in the 13 original colonies, those that could escape and travel to Louisiana did so during this period"

From ship records:

1500 Acadians were deported to Virgina(The English took pride that
of the 1500 Acadians shiped to Virginia only 500 survived, they felt that this was just punishment for being 'French Savages' and practicing Catholic beliefs. The goal of the Virginians was nothing short of extermination of the Acadian people. Those that did survive were madeinto slaves and worked and lived with the African Americans. After four months the Virginian legislature shipped the Acadians to England.)

450 Acadians were deported to Pennsylvania(Children were taken and put into slavery and seperated from their parents..all children under the age of 21 had to be given up)

450 Acadians were deported to Georgia (where many worked along side
the African Americans as slaves in the fields. Many were striped
of their Acadian names and given 'English' names)

2000 Acadians were deported to Massachusetts (where they would be whipped in public if the left their assigned towns to visit family..this includes the women and their minor children were sent into homes of Protestant families to work as slaves)

http://bayougenealogy.com/shiplists.html .

But more to the point, historically over one miliion Europeans were captured and sold into slavey in North Africa and the Middle East.

Read up.
http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/whtslav.h...
Black Deal

United States

#10 Oct 1, 2012
attai1 wrote:
<quoted text>
The same old story... rather boring and naturally off topic.
Here is what your own website in reference is telling that shows the HUGE difference between slavery inflicted to Blacks, based on their skin colour, and "indentured servitude" that a few whites have been through.
"AFTER CONTRACT WAS COMPLETED: Although many masters craftily figure out ways to extend an indentured servant's bondage (through accusing the servant of stealing, impregnating a female indenture servant, etc.), most indentured servants who survived the first four to seven years in America were freed. The master was required (depending upon the rules of the colony) to provide his former servant with the following: clothing, two hoes, three barrels of corn, and fifty acres of land."
4 to 7 years okay ... pleaaaase ! cut the B.S.
a whiteboi
Cut the bs

White folks was slaves to just like black folks was

You still being snatched up to
Barros Serrano

United States

#11 Oct 1, 2012
attai1 wrote:
<quoted text>
The same old story... rather boring and naturally off topic.
Here is what your own website in reference is telling that shows the HUGE difference between slavery inflicted to Blacks, based on their skin colour, and "indentured servitude" that a few whites have been through.
"AFTER CONTRACT WAS COMPLETED: Although many masters craftily figure out ways to extend an indentured servant's bondage (through accusing the servant of stealing, impregnating a female indenture servant, etc.), most indentured servants who survived the first four to seven years in America were freed. The master was required (depending upon the rules of the colony) to provide his former servant with the following: clothing, two hoes, three barrels of corn, and fifty acres of land."
4 to 7 years okay ... pleaaaase ! cut the B.S.
a whiteboi
You are ignorant of the real history of slavery in America.

In the 1600's most slaves in the 13 colonies were white.

And the “indentured servitude” you try to soft-pedal, was very often no different from slavery. People were tricked into lengthy prolongations of their time of servitude.

Many Euros, especially Irish and a fair number of Scots, were put on slave ships often WORSE than the ones hauling Africans, and shipped out simply because the English govt didn't want Ireland and the Highlands to be full of Irish and Scots. This was part of GENOCIDE especially in the case of Ireland.

Oh, but to your view, they were white, and so genocide and slavery wasn't painful, it was FUN... only black people can suffer, right?

So it was often not 4 to 7 years, and would that be acceptable to you today, if we enslave people for 4 to 7 years only? LOL...How lame an attempt to propagate your usual white self-hatred.

You're full of the myth which afficts many AA's... that “only they” suffered so much, nobody else's oppression compares. Well that is egotistical self-serving racist BULL$HIT and anyone who knows history can see that.

sand_cracker
Level 8

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#12 Oct 1, 2012
Barros Serrano wrote:
<quoted text>
In the 1600's most slaves in the 13 colonies were white.
Well, congratulations, Einstein. Of course they were white. What else could've they been? The Euro savages were not able to enslave Black people en masse back then yet.
Barros Serrano

United States

#13 Oct 1, 2012
sand_cracker wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, congratulations, Einstein. Of course they were white. What else could've they been? The Euro savages were not able to enslave Black people en masse back then yet.
You're an idiot.“of course”? The point is, most people don't realize it, because by that time there WERE a lot of Africans being taken by the transatlantic trade. In the 1600's far more Africans were being enslaved still by the Muslim savages, however.
mark

Alpharetta, GA

#15 Oct 1, 2012
attai1 wrote:
<quoted text>
The same old story... rather boring and naturally off topic.
Here is what your own website in reference is telling that shows the HUGE difference between slavery inflicted to Blacks, based on their skin colour, and "indentured servitude" that a few whites have been through.
"AFTER CONTRACT WAS COMPLETED: Although many masters craftily figure out ways to extend an indentured servant's bondage (through accusing the servant of stealing, impregnating a female indenture servant, etc.), most indentured servants who survived the first four to seven years in America were freed. The master was required (depending upon the rules of the colony) to provide his former servant with the following: clothing, two hoes, three barrels of corn, and fifty acres of land."
4 to 7 years okay ... pleaaaase ! cut the B.S.
a whiteboi
You need to do more research. whiteboi

http://www.google.com/url...
mark

Alpharetta, GA

#16 Oct 1, 2012
Barros Serrano wrote:
<quoted text>
You are ignorant of the real history of slavery in America.
In the 1600's most slaves in the 13 colonies were white.
And the “indentured servitude” you try to soft-pedal, was very often no different from slavery. People were tricked into lengthy prolongations of their time of servitude.
Many Euros, especially Irish and a fair number of Scots, were put on slave ships often WORSE than the ones hauling Africans, and shipped out simply because the English govt didn't want Ireland and the Highlands to be full of Irish and Scots. This was part of GENOCIDE especially in the case of Ireland.
Oh, but to your view, they were white, and so genocide and slavery wasn't painful, it was FUN... only black people can suffer, right?
So it was often not 4 to 7 years, and would that be acceptable to you today, if we enslave people for 4 to 7 years only? LOL...How lame an attempt to propagate your usual white self-hatred.
You're full of the myth which afficts many AA's... that “only they” suffered so much, nobody else's oppression compares. Well that is egotistical self-serving racist BULL$HIT and anyone who knows history can see that.
Thank you, these white people are ignorant to the facts. Whites like to act like it never happened. That is why they teach white slavery in schools

http://www.google.com/url...
mark

Alpharetta, GA

#17 Oct 1, 2012
The don't teach white slavery in schools
http://www.google.com/url...
Black Deal

United States

#18 Oct 1, 2012
attai1 wrote:
<quoted text>
The same old story... rather boring and naturally off topic.
Here is what your own website in reference is telling that shows the HUGE difference between slavery inflicted to Blacks, based on their skin colour, and "indentured servitude" that a few whites have been through.
"AFTER CONTRACT WAS COMPLETED: Although many masters craftily figure out ways to extend an indentured servant's bondage (through accusing the servant of stealing, impregnating a female indenture servant, etc.), most indentured servants who survived the first four to seven years in America were freed. The master was required (depending upon the rules of the colony) to provide his former servant with the following: clothing, two hoes, three barrels of corn, and fifty acres of land."
4 to 7 years okay ... pleaaaase ! cut the B.S.
a whiteboi
Now STFU

http://www.africaresource.com/rasta/sesostris...

white folks was slaves to

Level 8

Since: Oct 09

Paris France

#20 Oct 1, 2012
Garrig wrote:
<quoted text>
It wasn't all just indentured servitude.
This should be of some interest to YOU.
"When the Cajuns arrived in French Louisiana, most of the good land was already taken. Adding to their problems, they were told to get out of New Orleans. Their solution was to move to lands that were not occupied, and that were more difficult to settle. They eventually claimed lands of their own, and their numbers climbed to over 4,000 by 1790 and over 10,000 by 1810. Since the Acadians were being persecuted and sold into slavery in the 13 original colonies, those that could escape and travel to Louisiana did so during this period"
From ship records:
1500 Acadians were deported to Virgina(The English took pride that
of the 1500 Acadians shiped to Virginia only 500 survived, they felt that this was just punishment for being 'French Savages' and practicing Catholic beliefs. The goal of the Virginians was nothing short of extermination of the Acadian people. Those that did survive were madeinto slaves and worked and lived with the African Americans. After four months the Virginian legislature shipped the Acadians to England.)
450 Acadians were deported to Pennsylvania(Children were taken and put into slavery and seperated from their parents..all children under the age of 21 had to be given up)
450 Acadians were deported to Georgia (where many worked along side
the African Americans as slaves in the fields. Many were striped
of their Acadian names and given 'English' names)
2000 Acadians were deported to Massachusetts (where they would be whipped in public if the left their assigned towns to visit family..this includes the women and their minor children were sent into homes of Protestant families to work as slaves)
http://bayougenealogy.com/shiplists.html .
But more to the point, historically over one miliion Europeans were captured and sold into slavey in North Africa and the Middle East.
Read up.
http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/whtslav.h...
If you want to tell me that British white colonists at that time were Barbarians with white French people, i know that very well and for a looong time. Thanks for opening a ... wide open door.
As for Arab as slave traders of both African Blacks and European whites raided on the coast of Southern Europe like France, Italy and Spain, thanks too, i have a couple of Academic quality books on that.

But the Muslim slavers had nothing specific against whites being mostly white/brown themselves. It was a slave system based on religion.

As for Black slaves in America, nearly all were baptized and raised as Christians and nevertheless kept in slavery and in many cases in very harsh conditions with a reduced life expectancy.

You are eluding the major difference between these slave systems.
Besides the fact Europe was not depopulated between the XVIth and the XVIIIth centuries and the slave economy of the Mediterranean "Barbary" states has not been able to impact deeply the economic growth of the continent during these centuries or to stop/block the expansion of European influence.
Once again the comparison with the African states/kingdoms seriously weakened by this slave trade shows we have big difference between the two.

a whiteboi
Barros Serrano

United States

#22 Oct 1, 2012
attai1 wrote:
<quoted text>
If you want to tell me that British white colonists at that time were Barbarians with white French people, i know that very well and for a looong time. Thanks for opening a ... wide open door.
As for Arab as slave traders of both African Blacks and European whites raided on the coast of Southern Europe like France, Italy and Spain, thanks too, i have a couple of Academic quality books on that.
But the Muslim slavers had nothing specific against whites being mostly white/brown themselves. It was a slave system based on religion.
As for Black slaves in America, nearly all were baptized and raised as Christians and nevertheless kept in slavery and in many cases in very harsh conditions with a reduced life expectancy.
You are eluding the major difference between these slave systems.
Besides the fact Europe was not depopulated between the XVIth and the XVIIIth centuries and the slave economy of the Mediterranean "Barbary" states has not been able to impact deeply the economic growth of the continent during these centuries or to stop/block the expansion of European influence.
Once again the comparison with the African states/kingdoms seriously weakened by this slave trade shows we have big difference between the two.
a whiteboi
Ireland was not weakened by this? Or depopulated? Of course much of that depopulation was due to death rather than departure for America...

What the Muslim slave trade did to Africa far exceeds its damage to Europe. The Muslims took more slaves out than the Euros did, and under worse conditions.

The damage Muslims did to Europe was more in the constant attacks, the occupations of territory, the blocking of trade routes, and so on. Of course to the slaves taken, slavery was bad enough damage.

Again I see the assumption that color or “race” changes the nature of the suffering. If one is enslaved based on religion, apparently that is less odious than being enslaved due to place of origin, which means “race”(e.g., West Africa).

Enslavement of Europeans by Europeans in America, however was not based on religion, but on ethnicity or social class. English slaves were the very poor. Otherwise, slaves were generally Irish or Scot. This is as racial as the enslavement of “black” people and the pejorative stereotypes used by the English against the Irish and Scots were nearly identical to those used against black Africans. Savage, uncivilized, animalistic, emotional rather than rational, criminally inclined, sexually unbridled, etc.
Barros Serrano

United States

#23 Oct 1, 2012
Hellywood wrote:
You are an idiot. White uneducated male rednecks would be nowhere without "white male priviledge". That is "white male affirmative action" clan clown.
But white uneducated male rednecks ARE nowhere...

So what is your point?

Clearly those in power manipulating all of society, exploiting all and reaping the benefits are not the white uneducated male rednecks.
mark

Alpharetta, GA

#24 Oct 1, 2012
attai1 wrote:
<quoted text>
If you want to tell me that British white colonists at that time were Barbarians with white French people, i know that very well and for a looong time. Thanks for opening a ... wide open door.
As for Arab as slave traders of both African Blacks and European whites raided on the coast of Southern Europe like France, Italy and Spain, thanks too, i have a couple of Academic quality books on that.
But the Muslim slavers had nothing specific against whites being mostly white/brown themselves. It was a slave system based on religion.
As for Black slaves in America, nearly all were baptized and raised as Christians and nevertheless kept in slavery and in many cases in very harsh conditions with a reduced life expectancy.
You are eluding the major difference between these slave systems.
Besides the fact Europe was not depopulated between the XVIth and the XVIIIth centuries and the slave economy of the Mediterranean "Barbary" states has not been able to impact deeply the economic growth of the continent during these centuries or to stop/block the expansion of European influence.
Once again the comparison with the African states/kingdoms seriously weakened by this slave trade shows we have big difference between the two.
a whiteboi


At least you educated yourself a little. Your previous post said it was servitude that lasted 4-7yrs. It was White Slavery, Stop trying to put perfume on a pig. Google White slavery, there is a lot of info on it. Whites were slaves and blacks owned them.

Level 8

Since: Oct 09

Paris France

#25 Oct 2, 2012
Barros Serrano wrote:
<quoted text>
Ireland was not weakened by this? Or depopulated? Of course much of that depopulation was due to death rather than departure for America...
you give yourself part of the answer : famine and disease had a huge death toll in the middle XIXth in Ireland. But the depopulation was largely caused by immigration.

I've never heard that the Kennedys' were "slaves" in the USA ...

Here is what is said about the 1st immigrant of the family who died in 1858, so during slavery time : he was a very poor immigrant but was never, ever a "slave" or "indentured servant" not a year, not a month, not a day.

"The story of Patrick Kennedy has become probably the most famous of any of Ireland's millions of emigrants, due to the quick success of his children and grandchildren in American society and ultimately his great-grandson John F. Kennedy's election as the first Irish-American Catholic President (the only Roman Catholic to date). In June 1963, John F. Kennedy made a state visit to Ireland, in which he visited Dunganstown[1] and New Ross in County Wexford in what was seen as a personal tribute to his ancestry."

Irish immigration is not "slavery" ! pleeeeaaase cut the B.S.

a whiteboi

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Black women have options - THE NEW NORMAL 20 min 2 Dogs 25
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 31 min JRB 1,536,111
Dear White People (May '16) 42 min 2 Dogs 833
Bill Cosby: A lesson for "established" BM? 48 min 2 Dogs 2
White women are extremely jealous of bw! 53 min Gabar 48
White people are all evil and they all go to he... (Jan '14) 59 min Gabar 71
AXE got busted drooling over black balls in the... 1 hr THXhasvacuum 3
Why are black men so thirsty for white women? 2 hr Ttt 84
HA HA HA! Trump cuts $1.7 TRILLION in welfare! 4 hr coretta 226
Interracial dating is gross! (Nov '10) 5 hr SadButTrue 102
Black women want kids with that GOOD HAIR 5 hr SadButTrue 34
More from around the web