Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#25 Jan 4, 2014
Boon wrote:
<quoted text>
Nonsense. How different are middle easterners from european morphologically? Why are you so obsessed with Africa anyway? What if euroasians were in Africa 30K? Does it make your life better? LOL!
Mideasterners are of type J, Cro-Magnon of type I. Nowadays, they've been mixed, and so the difference is less noticeable.

I am interested in scientific facts. Eurasians (not “Euroasians”, learn to spell, boy) were in the Maghreb 30k bp.

The pertinent question is rather, Why does this bother YOU? Perhaps you're an insecure self-hating Afro-whitey Yank racist...

Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#26 Jan 4, 2014
Yep I Said It wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey Hillbilly; you've been DEBUNKED!
Your European trait has been proven to be inferior when dealing with THE FACTS OF THE UNDISPUTED TRUTH.
Next time Hillbilly try reading the garbage you use as factual proof.
I WIN
YOU LOSE
LMAO!
Wrong, boy, which is what I'll call you in person, boy.

Boy, you have won nothing, since you have no facts, boy.

You spew nonsense and have a little hissy fit because you know you can't stand before me intellectually or otherwise.

Boy.

The link I provided proved my case. End of story. Boy.

Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#27 Jan 4, 2014
Boon wrote:
<quoted text>
Neanderthal mix with what? I thought you said neanderthal mix with cro-magnon is modern european? How do you explain the "first european" not looking like euros?
As my link pointed out, boy, the first Europeans DID look like modern Europeans, boy.

Boy, they had characteristics which are only European, boy.

So, boy, you seem to be full of crap 100% of the time, boy.
asho

Eskilstuna, Sweden

#28 Jan 4, 2014
Ish Tov wrote:
<quoted text>
Mideasterners are of type J, Cro-Magnon of type I. Nowadays, they've been mixed, and so the difference is less noticeable.
I am interested in scientific facts. Eurasians (not “Euroasians”, learn to spell, boy) were in the Maghreb 30k bp.
The pertinent question is rather, Why does this bother YOU? Perhaps you're an insecure self-hating Afro-whitey Yank racist...
What has hg J got to do with morphological traits? Middle East have the same skull type as Europeans.
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#29 Jan 4, 2014
asho wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes it does. The skull does not have high bridge nose. watch.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =BRaQyy1RWrkXX
Its supposed to be a neanderthal hybrid!
asho

Eskilstuna, Sweden

#30 Jan 4, 2014
African AE wrote:
<quoted text>Its supposed to be a neanderthal hybrid!
Since you and barros are all about "science" post the evidence, please. Dna perhaps?
asho

Eskilstuna, Sweden

#31 Jan 4, 2014
African AE wrote:
<quoted text>Its supposed to be a neanderthal hybrid!
Hybrid with what? cro-magnon(with modern european trails?). Check out nose bridge of ths neanderthal skull. similar europeans.

http://www.google.se/imgres...

http://www.google.se/imgres...

Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#32 Jan 4, 2014
asho wrote:
<quoted text>
What has hg J got to do with morphological traits? Middle East have the same skull type as Europeans.
In a general sense.

The early Cro-Magnon, Mideasterners, and Maghrebians were very similar since they'd only diverged recently.

Y'all can fancy-dance around all this all you like, but Cro-Magnon were ancestral to modern Europeans. This is proven.
Sigma

Salado, TX

#33 Jan 4, 2014
Notice how Barros and AE avoided posting the dna evidence

Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#34 Jan 4, 2014
Smegma wrote:
Notice how Barros and AE avoided posting the dna evidence
You're either very stupid or a liar, since DNA evidence was presented in the first post of this thread.

Cro-Magnon DNA is known to be of types which are still present in Europe.

Now, go read the links in that first post.

And learn to shut up when that is the wisest course.

Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#35 Jan 8, 2014
Ish Tov wrote:
http://www.plosone.org/article /info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone .0002700
The DNA of this Cro-Magnon sample, 28k bp, is identical to DNA found in modern Europeans.
http://racialreality.blogspot.com/2011/02/cro...
Skull morphology shows European traits already developed in early Cro-Magnon.
And so, yet another Afronazi fantasy is punked & debunked. Cro-Magnon in Europe were Europeans. They weren't African-like, they weren't “black”.
No matter which part of the world we examine, we find clear and unequivocable scientific evidence that Afronazis view the world through a clenched sphincter.
BUMP for the TRUTH!!!

Afronazis in disarray, a collective hissy fit ongoing, over this and other REAL EVIDENCE I've posted about not only Cro-Magnon, but also Minoans and the Maghreb.

If they don't mind their manners, I will post EVEN MORE links to real scientific data which will cause Afronazis to twitch and squirm.

So entertaining to watch...

Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#36 Jan 9, 2014
Thoroughly punked and debunked on the topic of Cro-Magnon, by the EVIDENCE posted in this thread, our resident Afronazis have run off to claim the Andamanese...

This is what they always do... avoid any evidence, then claim I never post evidence! LOL!!

Afronazis = LIARS
fo shizzle mo nizzle

Gosport, UK

#37 Jan 9, 2014
Yep I Said It wrote:
Hey Hillbilly, you don't even comprehend your own schitt.
Lets do a slow review:
"Skull morphology shows European traits already developed in early Cro-Magnon"
The word "developed" means they had other traits prior. In which were more than likely African before they developed European traits.
You also fail to realize that you are attention seeking, which is another European trait.
You dumb nog, go back far enough and you'll it has traits similar to any of its ancient ancestors, heck we call came from the same slime, so I guess that Cro Magnon was a piece of mold?

SMDH
fo shizzle mo nizzle

Gosport, UK

#38 Jan 9, 2014
citizen 1986 wrote:
A consortium of European artists and scientists working for the forthcoming BBC 2 documentary series “The Incredible Human Journey” recently reconstructed the face of the first modern European and it turns out to be the face of an ancient so-called “Black” African immigrant. S/He probably lived 35,000 years ago in the ancient forests of the Carpathian Mountains around the present day Romania.
The bone reconstructions are based on scientifically validated skeletal and cranial measurements.
According to reports circulating in scientific journals, media and the internet:
..The facial features indicate the close affinity of these early Europeans to their immediate African ancestors, although it was still not possible to determine the person’s sex.
The scientists also conceed that:
“the colour was probably darker than modern-day Europeans, reflecting a more recent African origin”
The bones were discovered by Potholers in Pestera cu Oase, the “cave with bones”, located in the south-western Carpathians between 2002 and 2003. Radiocarbon dating confirmed their age at 35,000 years old.
Erik Trinkaus, professor of anthropology at Washington University in Missouri, and a scientist who studied the bones in detail, stated that the jaw was the oldest, directly-dated modern human fossil.
“Taken together, the material is the first that securely documents what modern humans looked like when they spread into Europe,” he said.
http://www.africaresource.com/rasta/wp-conten...
From your piece:

“the colour was probably darker than modern-day Europeans, reflecting a more recent African origin”

You know what probably means, right?

Also it says "darker" not black, Mediterraneans are 'darker' than north west Europeans...heck, skin tone wise Germanics are darker than red-haired Celts.

FACT:

ALL mammals on Earth are naturally pink skinned beneath fur, our ancestors were pinked skinned for a long time. How do we know?

Look at your palms and soles of feet, and underneath your finger and toe nails...are they "Black" or are they pink?

The mutation that made 'Black' skin didn't need to be under nails and palms/soles because they did not get enough sun exposure.

Your ancestor, and mine had for a long time, as a mammal, PINK skin.

There 'version' of pink skin in Whites today is different as it is a mutation, on the Black mutation...

But have NO doubt about it,'groid, you have pink skinned ancestors...even if mass didn't f*ck yo' momma all those years ago.

Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#39 Jan 9, 2014
This is true... under the hair, skin is light-colored. Not until hominins lost their body hair would the need have arisen for melanin in the skin. Subsequently, among various populations, skin color has lightened and darkened as habitat warrants.

This is too much science for Afronazis.

Also we know that skin had lightened considerably in Mideasterners and Europeans, as well as many Central Asians and East Asians, long before the more recent blond-light-skin-blue-eye gene everyone loves to talk about.

Skin color is a trivial characteristic, concentrated on by racists, but of little significance in determining human migrations and relationships.

Whoops... too much science for the Afronazis, again!

Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#41 Jan 9, 2014
BUMP for the Upper Palaeolithic TRUTH!

Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#42 Jan 9, 2014
Go Cro!

Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#43 Jan 10, 2014
BUMP for the Aurignacian truth!!!
asho

Eskilstuna, Sweden

#44 Jan 10, 2014
Ish Tov wrote:
http://www.plosone.org/article /info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone .0002700
The DNA of this Cro-Magnon sample, 28k bp, is identical to DNA found in modern Europeans.
http://racialreality.blogspot.com/2011/02/cro...
Skull morphology shows European traits already developed in early Cro-Magnon.
And so, yet another Afronazi fantasy is punked & debunked. Cro-Magnon in Europe were Europeans. They weren't African-like, they weren't “black”.
No matter which part of the world we examine, we find clear and unequivocable scientific evidence that Afronazis view the world through a clenched sphincter.
Didn't they have males. All trhe dna result you posted are Mtdna, why is that?
BigKnob

United States

#45 Jan 10, 2014
Any research done on reduced coloring matter, pigmentation loss,, and albinism, or why some people have melenocytes produced in the cells and some dont, even nature is colorful, and natural not un-natural..........that would be an abnormal peculiarity

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min sonicfilter 1,208,046
Yemen's crisis worsens 6 min selina london 39
Why do I attract so many light skin/mixed black... 6 min Jefferson 16
Are blacks the worst neighbors? (Mar '09) 7 min Looriginal 144
Why do white women treat black males as objects... (Jun '12) 7 min dbiggs69 440
Biracial IS NOT black 10 min selina london 545
40 Kids, 20 mothers.... WM 13 min dbiggs69 14
Hebrew Israelite (Feb '11) 14 min lenny 112,843
Are white women attracted to black men? (Aug '06) 1 hr KIP 122,840
A Bunch of Happy Black Women with Smiles on the... 1 hr ABM1977 46
What the hell is going on with black men? 1 hr Umm 57
More from around the web