A Cro-Magnon spear rectally skewers A...

A Cro-Magnon spear rectally skewers Afronazis

Posted in the African-American Forum

First Prev
of 6
Next Last

Ish Tov
Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#1 Jan 2, 2014
http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.13...
The DNA of this Cro-Magnon sample, 28k bp, is identical to DNA found in modern Europeans.

http://racialreality.blogspot.com/2011/02/cro...
Skull morphology shows European traits already developed in early Cro-Magnon.

And so, yet another Afronazi fantasy is punked & debunked. Cro-Magnon in Europe were Europeans. They weren't African-like, they weren't “black”.

No matter which part of the world we examine, we find clear and unequivocable scientific evidence that Afronazis view the world through a clenched sphincter.

Ish Tov
Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#2 Jan 2, 2014
BUMP for the Upper Palaeolithic TRUTH!!!
citizen 1986

UK

#4 Jan 3, 2014
Get a life
citizen 1986

UK

#5 Jan 3, 2014
A consortium of European artists and scientists working for the forthcoming BBC 2 documentary series “The Incredible Human Journey” recently reconstructed the face of the first modern European and it turns out to be the face of an ancient so-called “Black” African immigrant. S/He probably lived 35,000 years ago in the ancient forests of the Carpathian Mountains around the present day Romania.

The bone reconstructions are based on scientifically validated skeletal and cranial measurements.

According to reports circulating in scientific journals, media and the internet:

..The facial features indicate the close affinity of these early Europeans to their immediate African ancestors, although it was still not possible to determine the person’s sex.

The scientists also conceed that:

“the colour was probably darker than modern-day Europeans, reflecting a more recent African origin”

The bones were discovered by Potholers in Pestera cu Oase, the “cave with bones”, located in the south-western Carpathians between 2002 and 2003. Radiocarbon dating confirmed their age at 35,000 years old.

Erik Trinkaus, professor of anthropology at Washington University in Missouri, and a scientist who studied the bones in detail, stated that the jaw was the oldest, directly-dated modern human fossil.

“Taken together, the material is the first that securely documents what modern humans looked like when they spread into Europe,” he said.

http://www.africaresource.com/rasta/wp-conten...

Ish Tov
Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#7 Jan 3, 2014
citizen 1986 wrote:
A consortium of European artists and scientists working for the forthcoming BBC 2 documentary series “The Incredible Human Journey” recently reconstructed the face of the first modern European and it turns out to be the face of an ancient so-called “Black” African immigrant. S/He probably lived 35,000 years ago in the ancient forests of the Carpathian Mountains around the present day Romania.
The bone reconstructions are based on scientifically validated skeletal and cranial measurements.
According to reports circulating in scientific journals, media and the internet:
..The facial features indicate the close affinity of these early Europeans to their immediate African ancestors, although it was still not possible to determine the person’s sex.
The scientists also conceed that:
“the colour was probably darker than modern-day Europeans, reflecting a more recent African origin”
The bones were discovered by Potholers in Pestera cu Oase, the “cave with bones”, located in the south-western Carpathians between 2002 and 2003. Radiocarbon dating confirmed their age at 35,000 years old.
Erik Trinkaus, professor of anthropology at Washington University in Missouri, and a scientist who studied the bones in detail, stated that the jaw was the oldest, directly-dated modern human fossil.
“Taken together, the material is the first that securely documents what modern humans looked like when they spread into Europe,” he said.
http://www.africaresource.com/rasta/wp-conten...
The colour was “probably”... LOL!!!

They have no idea what the color of that specimen was.

You ignore the facts, as always, lying Afronazi cultboy.

Studies of cranial morphology indicate affinity between Cro-Magnon and modern Europeans. DNA shows the same.

You lose, Afronazi cultboy.

And the time since departure from Africa, lol... the LATEST possible date for OOA is 60k bp.

AFRONAZIS again PUNKED & DEBUNKED!!!

Ish Tov
Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#8 Jan 3, 2014
BUMP for the irrefutabe undeniable real scientifically-based valid TRUTH!!!

Yet another ridiculous Afronazi claim bite the dust!
Yep I Said It

Detroit, MI

#9 Jan 3, 2014
Hey Hillbilly, you don't even comprehend your own schitt.

Lets do a slow review:

"Skull morphology shows European traits already developed in early Cro-Magnon"

The word "developed" means they had other traits prior. In which were more than likely African before they developed European traits.

You also fail to realize that you are attention seeking, which is another European trait.

lomaxx

Fishers, IN

#10 Jan 3, 2014
Yep I Said It wrote:
"more than likely african"

More than likely huh? So it is not known for sure. Great scientific analysis your doing there. You want something to be true, so you bridge the gap and make assumptions. And naturally the assumption is biased toward your belief.

Ish Tov
Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#11 Jan 3, 2014
Yep I Said It wrote:
Hey Hillbilly, you don't even comprehend your own schitt.
Lets do a slow review:
"Skull morphology shows European traits already developed in early Cro-Magnon"
The word "developed" means they had other traits prior. In which were more than likely African before they developed European traits.
You also fail to realize that you are attention seeking, which is another European trait.
Petty personal insults don't hide the fact you have nothing to say. No, those traits developed from prior types, which were Mideastern, of type IJ, and before than IJK, and before than F. All Eurasian, not African.

You must deeply hate yourself to feel such a compulsion to make even Europe “black”. You should seek therapy for that.

Ish Tov
Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#12 Jan 3, 2014
lomaxx wrote:
<quoted text>
More than likely huh? So it is not known for sure. Great scientific analysis your doing there. You want something to be true, so you bridge the gap and make assumptions. And naturally the assumption is biased toward your belief.
Afronazis hate science, and evidence, since it always contradicts their racist ideologically-based fantasies.
Yep I Said It

Detroit, MI

#13 Jan 3, 2014
<Damn! You are not only and attention seeking hillbilly but you are very insecure as well>.

Hey, Hillbilly; you can't refute any of the evidence in which I've provided you.

Let’s do another slow review:

"Skull morphology shows European traits already developed in early Cro-Magnon"

The word "developed" means they had a different trait prior. In which was more than likely African before they developed European trait.

Hey Hillbilly you didn't even read the what you posted.
<If you did; you sure didn't comprehend it very well>

Here is from your own source:

“DNA sequences from ancient speciments may in fact result from undetected contamination of the ancient specimens by modern DNA, and the problem is particularly challenging in studies of human fossils. Doubts on the authenticity of the available sequences have so far hampered genetic comparisons between anatomically archaic (Neandertal) and early modern (Cro-Magnoid) Europeans”

http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.13...

It is even apparent that you didn't even read your own source.
This obnoxious action of yours of making ludacris claims and passing distorted information off as facts is the main reason why you are called “Hillbilly”.
Yep I Said It

Detroit, MI

#14 Jan 3, 2014
lomaxx wrote:
<quoted text>
More than likely huh? So it is not known for sure. Great scientific analysis your doing there. You want something to be true, so you bridge the gap and make assumptions. And naturally the assumption is biased toward your belief.
Don't get angry at me, because whites had to develop.
Yep I Said It

Detroit, MI

#15 Jan 3, 2014
Ish Tov wrote:
<quoted text>
Afronazis hate science, and evidence, since it always contradicts their racist ideologically-based fantasies.
Hey Hillbilly; you've been DEBUNKED!

Your European trait has been proven to be inferior when dealing with THE FACTS OF THE UNDISPUTED TRUTH.

Next time Hillbilly try reading the garbage you use as factual proof.

I WIN
YOU LOSE

LMAO!
African AE

Brackenfell, South Africa

#16 Jan 3, 2014
citizen 1986 wrote:
A consortium of European artists and scientists working for the forthcoming BBC 2 documentary series “The Incredible Human Journey” recently reconstructed the face of the first modern European and it turns out to be the face of an ancient so-called “Black” African immigrant. S/He probably lived 35,000 years ago in the ancient forests of the Carpathian Mountains around the present day Romania.
The bone reconstructions are based on scientifically validated skeletal and cranial measurements.
According to reports circulating in scientific journals, media and the internet:
..The facial features indicate the close affinity of these early Europeans to their immediate African ancestors, although it was still not possible to determine the person’s sex.
The scientists also conceed that:
“the colour was probably darker than modern-day Europeans, reflecting a more recent African origin”
The bones were discovered by Potholers in Pestera cu Oase, the “cave with bones”, located in the south-western Carpathians between 2002 and 2003. Radiocarbon dating confirmed their age at 35,000 years old.
Erik Trinkaus, professor of anthropology at Washington University in Missouri, and a scientist who studied the bones in detail, stated that the jaw was the oldest, directly-dated modern human fossil.
“Taken together, the material is the first that securely documents what modern humans looked like when they spread into Europe,” he said.
http://www.africaresource.com/rasta/wp-conten...
That pic is supposed to be a neanderthal mix! Considering the neanderthal was a white boy, its very unlikely that a mix neanderthal would look like a Khoisan! Where is the rest of the link ??????????
African AE

Brackenfell, South Africa

#17 Jan 3, 2014
Yep I Said It wrote:
<Damn! You are not only and attention seeking hillbilly but you are very insecure as well>.
Hey, Hillbilly; you can't refute any of the evidence in which I've provided you.
Let’s do another slow review:
"Skull morphology shows European traits already developed in early Cro-Magnon"
The word "developed" means they had a different trait prior. In which was more than likely African before they developed European trait.
Hey Hillbilly you didn't even read the what you posted.
<If you did; you sure didn't comprehend it very well>
Here is from your own source:
“DNA sequences from ancient speciments may in fact result from undetected contamination of the ancient specimens by modern DNA, and the problem is particularly challenging in studies of human fossils. Doubts on the authenticity of the available sequences have so far hampered genetic comparisons between anatomically archaic (Neandertal) and early modern (Cro-Magnoid) Europeans”
http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.13...
It is even apparent that you didn't even read your own source.
This obnoxious action of yours of making ludacris claims and passing distorted information off as facts is the main reason why you are called “Hillbilly”.
Modern Europeans look exactly like the neanderthal and Cromagnon:
www.youtube.com/watch>v=Zh0dbbBSa-k
Boon

Eskilstuna, Sweden

#19 Jan 4, 2014
Ish Tov wrote:
<quoted text>
Petty personal insults don't hide the fact you have nothing to say. No, those traits developed from prior types, which were Mideastern, of type IJ, and before than IJK, and before than F. All Eurasian, not African.
You must deeply hate yourself to feel such a compulsion to make even Europe “black”. You should seek therapy for that.
Nonsense. How different are middle easterners from european morphologically? Why are you so obsessed with Africa anyway? What if euroasians were in Africa 30K? Does it make your life better? LOL!
Boon

Eskilstuna, Sweden

#20 Jan 4, 2014
African AE wrote:
<quoted text>That pic is supposed to be a neanderthal mix! Considering the neanderthal was a white boy, its very unlikely that a mix neanderthal would look like a Khoisan! Where is the rest of the link ??????????
Neanderthal mix with what? I thought you said neanderthal mix with cro-magnon is modern european? How do you explain the "first european" not looking like euros?
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#22 Jan 4, 2014
THE REAL skeleton of the first European:
www.phys.org/news88139040.html

Looked nothing like an African!!!!!!!!!!
asho

Eskilstuna, Sweden

#23 Jan 4, 2014
African AE wrote:
THE REAL skeleton of the first European:
www.phys.org/news88139040.html
Looked nothing like an African!!!!!!!!!!
Yes it does. The skull does not have high bridge nose. watch.

Ish Tov
Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#24 Jan 4, 2014
Yep I Said It wrote:
<Damn! You are not only and attention seeking hillbilly but you are very insecure as well>.
Hey, Hillbilly; you can't refute any of the evidence in which I've provided you.
Let’s do another slow review:
"Skull morphology shows European traits already developed in early Cro-Magnon"
The word "developed" means they had a different trait prior. In which was more than likely African before they developed European trait.
Hey Hillbilly you didn't even read the what you posted.
<If you did; you sure didn't comprehend it very well>
Here is from your own source:
“DNA sequences from ancient speciments may in fact result from undetected contamination of the ancient specimens by modern DNA, and the problem is particularly challenging in studies of human fossils. Doubts on the authenticity of the available sequences have so far hampered genetic comparisons between anatomically archaic (Neandertal) and early modern (Cro-Magnoid) Europeans”
http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.13...
It is even apparent that you didn't even read your own source.
This obnoxious action of yours of making ludacris claims and passing distorted information off as facts is the main reason why you are called “Hillbilly”.
Lose the ethnic slurs, boy. They indicate that you are a complete ass as well as ignorant and trying to cloak the emptiness of your assertions.

And of course would you ever address someone thusly in person? Of course not, because you are also a raving coward.

Again, you don't know what you're talking about. European traits DEVELOPED which distinguished them from Mideastern and other traits which existed in the various descendants of F, IJK, and IJ.

How little you know about this! Since you're abysmally ignorant, you need to simply shut up.

Also, boy, "ludacris" is a rapper. The word is spell "ludicrous". You are truly uneducated and of low intelligence.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 6
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 min Notliz 1,643,739
White people stole from everyone in history wit... (Feb '12) 14 min Santiago Matamoras 211
Do black men really have larger penises? (Sep '10) 39 min Santiago Matamoras 1,602
How often did slaves need to be whipped? 1 hr Harvey Weinstein 1
Can AA's EVER be Troll-free? 1 hr Blackhead Popper 2
Mouthy know-it-all BW. ugh... 1 hr KIR SUCKA 11
Hebrew Israelite (Feb '11) 1 hr Micha Ben Israel 137,316
I feel like I can't be with a white guy if he's... 2 hr Dixieeland 119
Homogeneity Is The ONLY Way To MAGA 4 hr KIR SUCKA 28
Everyday I thank the Lord I am Black!! 5 hr NotSoDivineMsM 390
More from around the web