Chinese Scientist Proves The First Inhabitants Of China Were Black!

Posted in the African-American Forum

Comments
1 - 20 of 70 Comments Last updated 16 hrs ago
First Prev
of 4
Next Last
Reality Reigns

Chicago, IL

#1 Jan 14, 2014
For many years Black historians and Afrocentrists have said that the first inhabitants of China were black Africans."The N*groid races peopled at some time all the South of India, Indo-China and China. The South of Indo-China actually has now pure Negritos as the Semangs and mixed as the Malays and the Sakais."( H. Imbert, "Les Negritos de la Chine").“Even the sacred Manchu dynasty shows this Negro strain. The lower part of the face of the Emperor Pu-yi of Manchukuo, direct descendant of the Manchu rulers of China, is most distinctly N*groid. Chinese chroniclers report that a Negro Empire existed in the South of China at the dawn of that country's history".( Professor Chang Hsing-Lang , "The importation of Negro Slaves to China under the Tang Dynasty A.D. 618-907)“There is evidence of substantial populations of Blacks in early China. Archaeological studies have located a black substratum in the earliest periods of Chinese history, and reports of major kingdom ruled by Blacks are frequently in Chinese documents." (Kwang-Chih Chang, The Archaeology of Ancient China,(Yale University Press) and Irwin Graham, Africans Abroad (Columbia University Press).But after hundreds of years of the worldwide spread of the doctrine of white superiority and the inferiority of black Africans and their descendants. This notion that blacks were the original inhabitants of China was poo, pooed by white scientists and others and even by some blacks.But in 2005, a Chinese DNA specialist, Jin Li, leading a team of Chinese and other scientists, proved through DNA tests that indeed the first inhabitants of China were black Africans.
Reality Reigns

Chicago, IL

#2 Jan 14, 2014
The DNA Evidence

Li said he was trying to prove that the Chinese evolved from homo erectus independently of all other humans. He collected DNA samples from 165 different ethnic groups and over 12000 samples in China and Asia to test his theory. Li said he was taught through China’s education system that there was something special about Chinese, and because he was Chinese, he was hoping to prove that the Chinese developed independently of all other humans.But surprise, surprise, surprise, surprise that proved not to be true!Li’s team focused on a single genetic marker that appeared about 80,000 years ago in Africa. Anyone carrying that marker would have recent African ancestors and could not be descended from the more ancient Homo Erectus. Li and his team found that early humans belonged to different species but modern humans descended from the East Africans species.Li Hui, a scientist on Li’s team, said, that 100,000 years ago groups of humans started leaving Africa moving through South and Southeast Asia into China, and that 65 branches of the Chinese groups studied carry similar DNA mutations as the people of Southeast Asia.Jin Li, another scientist on Li's team, said “we did not see even one single individual that could be considered as a descendant of the homo erectus in China, rather, everybody was a descendant of our ancestors from Africa."Li was asked how he as a Chinese felt about what he found. He said “after I saw the evidence generated in my laboratory. I think we should all be happy with that. Because after all, modern humans from different parts of the world are not so different from each other and we are very close relatives.”(Amen Brother!) Li’s team was composed of an international group of scientist from China, Russia, India, Brazil and other nations. This was a 5 year project to study the geographic and genealogical routes tracing the spread and settlements of ancient and modern humans.Now DNA tests prove, what the Afrocentric historians have been asserting for years is true, that all modern human originated on some part of the African continent. Believe It Or Not,(or for some people, read em and weep)I'll leave you with the wise words of Richard Leaky,
Reality Reigns

Chicago, IL

#3 Jan 14, 2014
Richard Leaky

"If you get to the stage where you can persuade people on the evidence, that it's solid, that we are all African, that color is superficial, that stages of development of culture are all interactive, then I think we have a chance of a world that will respond better to global challenges." Richard Leaky, Paleoanthropologist

http://vveasey.hubpages.com/hub/Chinese-Scien...
Charles Darwin

Blackburn, UK

#5 Jan 14, 2014
All anatomically modern humans started out in Eastern Africa and were black. They then migrated out of Africa and colonised the world. At this time they were still black. This means all humans in Asia and Europe were black initially. After sufficient time for different selection pressures to take effect, skin hues gradually changed as a function of sunlight intensity variations at different geographical locations. Mitochondrial DNA tracing has proven the out of Africa theory. Recent published data suggests people became white in Europe 12, 000 - 6, 000 years ago - google it if you need convincing and you will find the paper RE the gene in question.
Charles Darwin

Blackburn, UK

#7 Jan 14, 2014
The only reason the skin lightened for Europeans was that under less intense sun white skin absorbs sunlight better, thus optimising vitamin D metabolism and therefore the integrity of bones. This makes white skin a selection advantage in this scenario. The opposite is true under intense sun, hence why people who stayed in Africa remained black.
Blacks Are Worthless

Miami, FL

#8 Jan 14, 2014
I don't care that the first human in Africa was a n!@@er but no way in heII was the first humans from all the other continents n!@@ers, GOD was White & am a White child of his only begotten son Jesus Christ who also was no n!@@er, I don't care what the DNA says.

Level 8

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#9 Jan 14, 2014
Charles Darwin wrote:
All anatomically modern humans started out in Eastern Africa and were black. They then migrated out of Africa and colonised the world. At this time they were still black. This means all humans in Asia and Europe were black initially. After sufficient time for different selection pressures to take effect, skin hues gradually changed as a function of sunlight intensity variations at different geographical locations. Mitochondrial DNA tracing has proven the out of Africa theory. Recent published data suggests people became white in Europe 12, 000 - 6, 000 years ago - google it if you need convincing and you will find the paper RE the gene in question.
I do not believe they were black. You will have to prove that which you cannot do. You cannot even prove that all people in Africa were initially black. You are nothing but another stupid black racist who do nothing but make it harder and harder for us to Unify Africa.

Level 8

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#10 Jan 14, 2014
Charles Darwin wrote:
The only reason the skin lightened for Europeans was that under less intense sun white skin absorbs sunlight better, thus optimising vitamin D metabolism and therefore the integrity of bones. This makes white skin a selection advantage in this scenario. The opposite is true under intense sun, hence why people who stayed in Africa remained black.
Neanderthal genes is what made white people white. It has nothing to do with the sun. I think blacks became black simply by congregating around darker and darker brown people. The first humans were probably brown, not black. Blacks are a distinct minority in Africa and restricted to a rather small area of the land in Africa. Stop believing in racism. It is a white man's ideology meant to divide and conquer us. There is no place for black racism in this modern world.
asho

Eskilstuna, Sweden

#11 Jan 14, 2014
Abdurratln wrote:
<quoted text>
I do not believe they were black. You will have to prove that which you cannot do. You cannot even prove that all people in Africa were initially black. You are nothing but another stupid black racist who do nothing but make it harder and harder for us to Unify Africa.
If they were not black, were they arab muslims?^_^ Of course they were black . Evolving in africa requires it. Isnt your dream to unify africans and arab?
asho

Eskilstuna, Sweden

#12 Jan 14, 2014
Abdurratln wrote:
<quoted text>
Neanderthal genes is what made white people white. It has nothing to do with the sun. I think blacks became black simply by congregating around darker and darker brown people. The first humans were probably brown, not black. Blacks are a distinct minority in Africa and restricted to a rather small area of the land in Africa. Stop believing in racism. It is a white man's ideology meant to divide and conquer us. There is no place for black racism in this modern world.
africa has black people, majority, mixed race east africans and caucasoid types in north african. So black people are not a minority. Leave that skin tone nonsense in the US.

Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#13 Jan 14, 2014
Charles Darwin wrote:
All anatomically modern humans started out in Eastern Africa and were black. They then migrated out of Africa and colonised the world. At this time they were still black. This means all humans in Asia and Europe were black initially. After sufficient time for different selection pressures to take effect, skin hues gradually changed as a function of sunlight intensity variations at different geographical locations. Mitochondrial DNA tracing has proven the out of Africa theory. Recent published data suggests people became white in Europe 12, 000 - 6, 000 years ago - google it if you need convincing and you will find the paper RE the gene in question.
This is incorrect. They were not “black” when spreading out across Eurasia and beyond. Evolution had occurred.

The early Cro-Magnon in Europe are shown to have already been European in their characteristics, and in their DNA.

Light skin is far older than that one gene you mention.

Here we see the problem when people ignorant of anthropology pick up a few facts out of context and don't know how to properly interpret them.

I don't have that problem... I know the anthropology.

Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#14 Jan 14, 2014
This study is being misinterpreted here for Afronazi purpose.

What was shown by the DNA study in China is that Chinese are the offspring of OOA people... not that they were Africans. This was to investigate the claim that Chinese had evolved from local pre-sapiens, which is the multiregional hypothesis. This study proved that in fact they descended from OOA migrants from Africa.

Still they were and are 100% Eurasian. All their DNA markers are Eurasian. None are African.

“I support Cystic Fibrosis.”

Level 4

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#15 Jan 14, 2014
The arab and the jew will fill this thread up about how blacks never left Africa until albinos got there.

“I support Cystic Fibrosis.”

Level 4

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#16 Jan 14, 2014
Reality Reigns wrote:
For many years Black historians and Afrocentrists have said that the first inhabitants of China were black Africans."The N*groid races peopled at some time all the South of India, Indo-China and China. The South of Indo-China actually has now pure Negritos as the Semangs and mixed as the Malays and the Sakais."( H. Imbert, "Les Negritos de la Chine").“Even the sacred Manchu dynasty shows this Negro strain. The lower part of the face of the Emperor Pu-yi of Manchukuo, direct descendant of the Manchu rulers of China, is most distinctly N*groid. Chinese chroniclers report that a Negro Empire existed in the South of China at the dawn of that country's history".( Professor Chang Hsing-Lang , "The importation of Negro Slaves to China under the Tang Dynasty A.D. 618-907)“There is evidence of substantial populations of Blacks in early China. Archaeological studies have located a black substratum in the earliest periods of Chinese history, and reports of major kingdom ruled by Blacks are frequently in Chinese documents." (Kwang-Chih Chang, The Archaeology of Ancient China,(Yale University Press) and Irwin Graham, Africans Abroad (Columbia University Press).But after hundreds of years of the worldwide spread of the doctrine of white superiority and the inferiority of black Africans and their descendants. This notion that blacks were the original inhabitants of China was poo, pooed by white scientists and others and even by some blacks.But in 2005, a Chinese DNA specialist, Jin Li, leading a team of Chinese and other scientists, proved through DNA tests that indeed the first inhabitants of China were black Africans.
Oh you didn't hear? These fools try to divide up Negritos and black Africans.

“I support Cystic Fibrosis.”

Level 4

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#18 Jan 14, 2014
Fukanalbino wrote:
<quoted text>If it's true, it's true.
But it is not true.
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#19 Jan 14, 2014
Reality Reigns wrote:
The DNA Evidence
Li said he was trying to prove that the Chinese evolved from homo erectus independently of all other humans. He collected DNA samples from 165 different ethnic groups and over 12000 samples in China and Asia to test his theory. Li said he was taught through China’s education system that there was something special about Chinese, and because he was Chinese, he was hoping to prove that the Chinese developed independently of all other humans.But surprise, surprise, surprise, surprise that proved not to be true!Li’s team focused on a single genetic marker that appeared about 80,000 years ago in Africa. Anyone carrying that marker would have recent African ancestors and could not be descended from the more ancient Homo Erectus. Li and his team found that early humans belonged to different species but modern humans descended from the East Africans species.Li Hui, a scientist on Li’s team, said, that 100,000 years ago groups of humans started leaving Africa moving through South and Southeast Asia into China, and that 65 branches of the Chinese groups studied carry similar DNA mutations as the people of Southeast Asia.Jin Li, another scientist on Li's team, said “we did not see even one single individual that could be considered as a descendant of the homo erectus in China, rather, everybody was a descendant of our ancestors from Africa."Li was asked how he as a Chinese felt about what he found. He said “after I saw the evidence generated in my laboratory. I think we should all be happy with that. Because after all, modern humans from different parts of the world are not so different from each other and we are very close relatives.”(Amen Brother!) Li’s team was composed of an international group of scientist from China, Russia, India, Brazil and other nations. This was a 5 year project to study the geographic and genealogical routes tracing the spread and settlements of ancient and modern humans.Now DNA tests prove, what the Afrocentric historians have been asserting for years is true, that all modern human originated on some part of the African continent. Believe It Or Not,(or for some people, read em and weep)I'll leave you with the wise words of Richard Leaky,
No one originated from anatomically correct ancient skeletons! All originated from Homo-Erectus/Neanderthal! There ARE NO ancient anatomically correct ancient Africans found outside Africa!
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#20 Jan 14, 2014
I see triplets wrote:
The arab and the jew will fill this thread up about how blacks never left Africa until albinos got there.
Sorry no anatomically correct ancient African skeletons found outside Africa! PROVE ME WRONG!

Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#21 Jan 14, 2014
I see triplets wrote:
The arab and the jew will fill this thread up about how blacks never left Africa until albinos got there.
Watch the racist language, boy. You would not enjoy the consequences were you to spew such racism in my presence.

“albinos”? F. U., boy.

Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#22 Jan 14, 2014
I see triplets wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh you didn't hear? These fools try to divide up Negritos and black Africans.
They are not the same people, boy.

“Negritos”, so-called, are pure Eurasian.

And YOU, boy, are not a Hebrew.

“I support Cystic Fibrosis.”

Level 4

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#23 Jan 14, 2014
African AE wrote:
<quoted text>Sorry no anatomically correct ancient African skeletons found outside Africa! PROVE ME WRONG!
If you say so, white boy.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

First Prev
of 4
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Why do blacks claim to be the true Israelites? ... (May '11) 6 min African AE 4,567
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 9 min THE DEVIL 1,099,840
Lol.. WW Has 8 Mix Kids wants MORE!! 9 min Bychance37 319
Michael Brown .. STRONG ARM ROBBERY ??? 9 min LION 1,893
the moors were black africans not arabs!!! (Jun '08) 16 min African AE 24,212
How has Africa from the begining of time influe... (May '13) 21 min African AE 1,819
The New Fight for Racial Justice 1 hr Shinichiro Takizawa 14
Are white women attracted to black men? (Aug '06) 1 hr Loulou 120,493
I don't want to marry a BLACK MAN 1 hr Ugh 3,036
There's A War On The Black Male 2 hr noah 407
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••

African-American People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••