aids made to kill of the black race?

aids made to kill of the black race?

Posted in the African-American Forum

C-Bisquit

AOL

#3 Aug 8, 2007
I dont think this would come as a shock to anyone. We've been sayin this from the beginning
oh boy

West Chester, PA

#5 Aug 9, 2007
u people r so paranoid!! takes 10 years to kill u.

whitey want u dead--make drug/disease that kill u in 1 yr.
nobody

Saint Louis, MO

#6 Aug 18, 2007
Please, I get tired of the black attitude of poor me, the white man blah blah. I have never seen a race so self hating and loathing. The mexicans are coming and taking your jobs. Welfare money is drying up. Now what are you going to do??
Get real

Saint Louis, MO

#7 Aug 18, 2007
If you wanna kill blacks, just give them guns and crack. Seems to be working nicely. They ruined St. Louis.
no name

Pearl River, NY

#8 Aug 18, 2007
I'd have to disagree. Africans kill each other everyday, it's actually hard to tell what's causing more deaths, self-genocide or aids? Add famine to that and you see the whole picture
no name

Pearl River, NY

#9 Aug 18, 2007
Here's something I found

Article by Dr. Beatrice Hahn. In this article her research group has demonstrated that a certain kind (subspecies) of chimpanzee found only in Cameroon, Equatorial Guinea, and Gabon carries an HIV-1 virus like virus (HIV= Human Immunodeficiency Virus; AIDS virus) called SIVcpzUS (SIV= Simian Immunodeficiency Virus). This HIV-1 virus is very similar to the HIV-1 virus seen in humans today. The chimpanzees do not appear to get sick from this HIV-1 infection either.

People living in these countries have for years and years hunted these chimpanzees. They were used as meat for these peoples. The meat is called bush meat. It is postulated that the people who hunted these chimpanzees were often infected by the virus and eventually died. They would get cut when they cut up the animal and some of the chimpanzee's contaminated blood would infect the hunter. Since few people ever went into these rain forests there was little chance of the disease spreading.
MARTIN LUTHER QUEEN JR

Anadarko, OK

#11 Aug 19, 2007
AHAHAHA YOU GUYS ARE RETARDED

If whites made this virus to kill you... WHY DO WE SEND HELP? If we left you alone you would have been extinct by now because AIDs developed in lower PRIMATES and you EAT THESE PRIMATES or F*CK them and then you got the virus. White people did not engineer this virus, if they did surely they wouldn't allow it to spread out of Africa?

You stupid negroid conspiracy theorists. So much more advanced than us but can't even make a damn wheel. God.
Hmm

Calgary, Canada

#12 Aug 19, 2007
MARTIN LUTHER QUEEN JR wrote:
AHAHAHA YOU GUYS ARE RETARDED
If whites made this virus to kill you... WHY DO WE SEND HELP? If we left you alone you would have been extinct by now because AIDs developed in lower PRIMATES and you EAT THESE PRIMATES or F*CK them and then you got the virus. White people did not engineer this virus, if they did surely they wouldn't allow it to spread out of Africa?
You stupid negroid conspiracy theorists. So much more advanced than us but can't even make a damn wheel. God.
Another stupid white fool devil. Go play with fire and burn your ass down to the ground you stupid pathetic waste of life.
yeah

West Chester, PA

#14 Aug 19, 2007
and you know--the funny thing is, the *smarter* blacks --the educated ones that is--actually believe this fiction.

what does that tell you about the race itself?

its hopeless, its whiny, its complaining, and its suspicious.

any ailment that affects blacks, well, whites were behind it somehow, someway, in some manner.

black man makes it high, whitey wants to kncok him down.

its soooo ridiculous and dumb--their beliefs. the only race on earth who feels this way--american blacks.

what a self-loathing group if i ever heard of one.
rani-chan

Honolulu, HI

#15 Aug 19, 2007
no name wrote:
I'd have to disagree. Africans kill each other everyday, it's actually hard to tell what's causing more deaths, self-genocide or aids? Add famine to that and you see the whole picture
africans kill each other every day because of european chaos. if it wasn't for the usurp of land by the europeans, african would be a totally different place. EVEN SAFER.

Since: Jul 07

North London

#17 Aug 19, 2007
Listen, according to the UN, sub saharan Africa is still the worst affected by Aids on a per capita basis. Over the last few years the most striking increases in HIV infection rate have occured in East Asia, Eastern Europe and Central Asia. In fact, the country with the highest number of infected people is now India...Aids is not simly an African problem, but a world problem. Check out www.unaids.org for the stats.

ECR

Since: Jan 07

Arlington, VA

#18 Aug 20, 2007
The fact of the matter is that someone who has sex with an uninfected partner has a 0% risk of contracting HIV. Someone who has protected sex with an infected partner is at risk for contracting the virus, but their risk isn’t as great as if they weren’t using protection. Of course, the person who is most at risk is the individual who has unprotected sex with an infected partner. When last I checked, there is nothing stopping anyone from 1) taking an AIDS test, 2) using protection each and every time they have sex, and 3) refraining from promiscuous behavior. The fact of the matter is that some people would rather die than take an active role in preserving their own health. I think it’s much easier to blame a white/government conspiracy for the HIV transmission rate in the black community than widespread ignorance and lack of personal responsibility. Yes, there are people who have unknowingly contracted the virus from their partner, but most of the new cases in our community reflect risky behavior.
Doctor Boris Zhiguli

Lublin, Poland

#21 Aug 20, 2007
You have figured it out.
Very clever.

I developed the AIDS virus in my secret laboratory in Bulgaria. It took me many years, but I finally achieved great success!

Then I had to propagate the virus somehow. Well, I injected the first few black people in Africa when we were eradicating Smallpox and the blacks did the rest themselves.

You see, even though they know how to prevent it - they cannot help themselves and just continue to spread the virus amongst themselves.

My plan was pure genius. Pure diabolical Genius.
motorola casanova

AOL

#22 Aug 20, 2007
Doctor Boris Zhiguli wrote:
You have figured it out.
Very clever.
I developed the AIDS virus in my secret laboratory in Bulgaria. It took me many years, but I finally achieved great success!
Then I had to propagate the virus somehow. Well, I injected the first few black people in Africa when we were eradicating Smallpox and the blacks did the rest themselves.
You see, even though they know how to prevent it - they cannot help themselves and just continue to spread the virus amongst themselves.
My plan was pure genius. Pure diabolical Genius.
nice try. if you were for real, you'd be in Wikipedia.

“Technical Anomaly”

Since: Apr 07

Walnut Creek, OH

#23 Aug 20, 2007
Why was AIDs made?

http://www.topix.com/forum/tracker/view...

Very suspicious, was it made?

“Technical Anomaly”

Since: Apr 07

Walnut Creek, OH

#24 Aug 20, 2007
rani-chan wrote:
<quoted text>
africans kill each other every day because of european chaos. if it wasn't for the usurp of land by the europeans, african would be a totally different place. EVEN SAFER.
BINGO!
MARTIN LUTHER QUEEN JR

Anadarko, OK

#25 Aug 20, 2007
An adult male langur who's become the head of the establishment ensconces himself at the center of his group looking ever-so-regal. He has every reason for sitting pretty. If you take a closer look at the cluster of langurs milling around him, you'll discover that all of them are either his wives or his children. The females do his bidding, and offer their bodies only to him. If they attempt a romance with some dashing bachelor, they are severely punished. So is the hopeful seducer. No wonder the central male looks so lordly. He is surrounded by a tribe devoted to one primary purpose--having and raising his kids.

As we saw several chapters ago, not every member of the langur society is happy about this state of affairs. In the jungle nearby roams a gang of post-pubertal hooligans who have left home permanently to hang with toughs their own age. Their newly spurting sexual hormones have triggered the growth of horniness, muscle and a cocky aggression. Periodically, the gang of youthful thugs advances on the territory where the well-fixed elder statesman sits in the midst of his massive family. The hoodlums try to get his attention. They mock and challenge the patriarch. He sometimes sits aloof, refusing to dignify their taunts with a response. On other occasions, he ambles over to the periphery of the harem, then rears up and puts on a display of outrage that chases the young Turks away. But from time to time, the massed delinquents continue their challenge, starting a fight that can be brutal indeed. If they are lucky, the upstarts trounce their dignified superior thoroughly, chasing him from his comfortable home.

Then the newly triumphant members of the younger generation execute an atrocity. They wade into the screaming females, grabbing babies left and right. They swing the infants against the trees, smash them against the ground, bite their heads and crush their skulls. They kill and kill. When the orgy of bloodlust is over, not an infant remains. Yet the females in their sexual prime are completely unhurt.

The mass murder is anything but random. Like Effie's infanticide, it has a simple goal. This cluster of wives was raising the children of the old man who just fled. As long as the ladies continued to suckle infants, they would be tied to the children of the toppled authority figure. A natural birth-control device called lactational amenorrhea would keep them uninterested in sex, preventing them from entering estrus, and blocking the females from carrying the seed of the new conquerors. When a mother's baby is killed and her suckling stops, however, the whole game changes. Her biochemistry shifts, resurrecting her sexual interest. She becomes an empty womb waiting to have another child. And this time, the child will not belong to the deposed monarch--it will carry the legacy of one of the invaders.
MARTIN LUTHER QUEEN JR

Anadarko, OK

#26 Aug 20, 2007
But surely humans don't indulge in such barbarities. Or do they? In the rain forests near the Amazon live a people called the Yanomamo. Their ethnographer, Napoleon Chagnon, calls them "the fierce people." They pride themselves on their cruelty, glorying in it so enthusiastically that they make a great show of beating their wives. And the wives are as much a part of this viciousness as the husbands. A spouse who does not carry enough scars from her husband's blows feels rejected and complains miserably about her unbruised condition. It is a sign, she is certain, that her husband does not love her.

Yanomamo men have two great sports--hunting and war. The patterns of their warfare bear a strange resemblance to those of the langur. Yanomamo men sneak up on a neighboring village and attack. If they are successful, they kill or chase away the men. They leave the sexually-capable young women unharmed. But they move methodically through the lean-to-like homes, grabbing babies from the screaming captives. Like the langurs, the Yanomamo men beat these infants against the ground, bash their brains out on the rocks, and make the footpaths wet with babies' blood. They spear the older children with the sharp ends of their bows, pinning their quivering bodies to the ground. Others they simply throw from the edge of a cliff.

To the Yanomamo, this is an exhilarating entertainment. They brag and boast as they smash fresh newborns against the stones. When the winning warriors have finished, not a single suckling child remains. Then the triumphant Yanomamo men lead the captured women back to a new life as secondary wives. No wonder the Yanomamo word for marriage means "dragging something away."

What have the Yanomamo victors accomplished? The same thing the langurs did. They have freed the females from the biochemical birth control device that keeps a suckling woman from bearing new progeny. The Yanomamo fighters have made the wombs of their captured consorts available to carry fresh children...their children. The Yanomamo are not some strange aberration dragged out of the jungle to illustrate a far-fetched point. In the early fourth century, Eusebius --the first historian of the Christian Church-- summarized what the study of history had focused on until his time: war, slaughters for the sake of country and children. Hugo Grotius in 1625 published De Jure Bellis ac Pacis (Concerning The Law of War and Peace), a book that tried to make Christian war more humane. In it, Grotius justified killing children. He cited the 137th psalm, which said, "Happy shall he be who takes and dashes your little ones against the rock." So Grotius was well aware of two things. That killing the children of the people you'd attacked was common in the days of the Old Testament. And that it remained as common as ever in the Europe of the 1600s.

In fact, the restless effort of human males to find more wombs that will carry their seed has been dignified by the forefathers of western civilization. The rape of the Sabine women, a bit of Roman history anyone with a modest classical education can recount, was a stunt very similar to those frequently pulled off by the Yanomamo. The heros of the tale--a gang of early Romans--invited the neighboring tribesmen and their wives over for dinner and entertainment. The entertainment turned out to be a display of Roman weapons. The hosts pulled their swords, grabbed the girls, then attacked and chased away the husbands. There was a high time among the Roman founding fathers as they indulged merrily in sex with the weeping captives. And nine months later, there was more weeping as the kidnapped ladies gave birth to a fresh crop of infants--the babies of the banquet hosts.
Madeline

Smyrna, TN

#27 Jan 15, 2013
MARTIN LUTHER QUEEN JR wrote:
AHAHAHA YOU GUYS ARE RETARDED
If whites made this virus to kill you... WHY DO WE SEND HELP? If we left you alone you would have been extinct by now because AIDs developed in lower PRIMATES and you EAT THESE PRIMATES or F*CK them and then you got the virus. White people did not engineer this virus, if they did surely they wouldn't allow it to spread out of Africa?
You stupid negroid conspiracy theorists. So much more advanced than us but can't even make a damn wheel. God.
.
Wow you don't need to be so racist ya there's fighting over in Africa but if you haven't noticed there's blacks ALL over the world if we left them alone there might have been fewer people in Africa but not extinct ya I'm white but really black people can be allot less annoying them allot of white people like you being a little racist wtf they can't even build a wheel I would like to see you build one without any material

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Are black people more prone to violence because... (Feb '14) 1 min Trump 42
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min Cheech the Conser... 1,458,018
OMG , The Flinstones Landed on the Moon ???????... 7 min Trump 126
year 2096................................... 10 min AAM2000 219
White People Are Evolved African Albinos (Sep '12) 10 min proudwisechimp 89
SPECIAL REPORT : most FOOD STAMP & WELFARE Reci... 14 min dcool 178
no blacks allowed in this thread 16 min AAM2000 22
Thanksgiving is a WHITES ONLY holiday! 1 hr dcool 269
the moors were black africans not arabs!!! (Jun '08) 2 hr PolakPotrafi 50,569
News The real reasons the U.S. became less racist to... 2 hr PolakPotrafi 154
Fidel Castro dies at 90 3 hr Marcus Washington 133
More from around the web