Why are blacks the only mammals with kinky hair?

Posted in the African-American Forum

First Prev
of 2
Next Last

“I support Cystic Fibrosis.”

Level 4

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#1 Jul 18, 2013
Because we are as far from animals as you can get. Unlike whites who look like dogs and have pink skin like most mammals.
Plantation Czar

Korea

#2 Jul 18, 2013
Is that why you slave-descended monkeys look, sound, smell, live, and act like feral animals?

Is that why Humans look at you slave descendants as useless undesirable animals?
Ben

United States

#3 Jul 18, 2013
I see triplets wrote:
Because we are as far from animals as you can get. Unlike whites who look like dogs and have pink skin like most mammals.
its all pink inside.
No Limit Cracker

Korea

#6 Jul 18, 2013
Well-said! These monkeys haven't even evolved past the "fight or flight" stage yet. That's why the vile vermin can be both incredibly violent and laughable cowards both at the same time.

“I support Cystic Fibrosis.”

Level 4

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#7 Jul 18, 2013
obsolete farm equipment wrote:
<quoted text>
It's because you sub-Saharan savages are mutations,
Get an education. Sub Saharan blacks are not the only blacks with kinky hair fool.

The fact that only humans have kinky hair shows we are as far from animals as you can get. So you can try to explain it away by chimping all you want.

Unlike you whites with no lips, pink skin, and straight hair just like most primates.

“I support Cystic Fibrosis.”

Level 4

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#8 Jul 18, 2013
No Limit Cracker wrote:
Well-said! These monkeys haven't even evolved past the "fight or flight" stage yet. That's why the vile vermin can be both incredibly violent and laughable cowards both at the same time.
It is funny how they try to explain it away isn't it? It is clear they are closer to animals than we are.

“I support Cystic Fibrosis.”

Level 4

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#9 Jul 18, 2013
So not only are whites horrifically inbred. But they are closer to animals than actual humans are.
blue eyes

Johannesburg, South Africa

#11 Jul 18, 2013
why does the fact that blacks have kinky hair have to bother AA's in any way??.Funny how a AA would talk about white being monkeyish when they themselves the AA's are mixed with whites.AA's are not black ppl and they dont have kinky hair but straight hair
blue eyes

Johannesburg, South Africa

#12 Jul 18, 2013
I see triplets wrote:
So not only are whites horrifically inbred. But they are closer to animals than actual humans are.
And so are you AA's since you are mixed with whites

“I support Cystic Fibrosis.”

Level 4

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#15 Jul 18, 2013
o-h-r-e-a-l-l-y wrote:
<quoted text>You have brown skin, like the poop of most animals, dummy. By your own logic, "negro" is the crappiest race.
Most mammals have pink skin honkey.

“I support Cystic Fibrosis.”

Level 4

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#16 Jul 18, 2013
Look at them chimping, cause they know I speak the truth. You can not find a mammal or any animal for that matter with kinky hair. That is clear proof we are farther from animals than whites are.
Chuck

United States

#17 Jul 18, 2013
obsolete farm equipment wrote:
<quoted text>
What the dumb apes don't seem to get, is that the first 'humans' would have had pink skin, as they had more hair.
Nigguh shit-skin came about when the very distant ancestors lost hair density, for whatever reason.
Nigguhs also don't seem to get, that humans and the sub-Saharan savages are two different branches of the original Homo Sapiens...a few H Sapiens still exist in north east Africa, but everyone else on the planet are either Eurasian {the intelligent people} or sub-Saharan {the savage retarded monkeys}.
In fact, sub-Saharan Africans are the world's minority people....
Read up on your mutation idiot.

Scientists said yesterday that they have discovered a tiny genetic mutation that largely explains the first appearance of white skin in humans tens of thousands of years ago, a finding that helps solve one of biology's most enduring mysteries and illuminates one of humanity's greatest sources of strife.

The work suggests that the skin-whitening mutation occurred by chance in a single individual after the first human exodus from Africa, when all people were brown-skinned. That person's offspring apparently thrived as humans moved northward into what is now Europe, helping to give rise to the lightest of the world's races.

Leaders of the study, at Penn State University, warned against interpreting the finding as a discovery of "the race gene." Race is a vaguely defined biological, social and political concept, they noted, and skin color is only part of what race is -- and is not.

In fact, several scientists said, the new work shows just how small a biological difference is reflected by skin color. The newly found mutation involves a change of just one letter of DNA code out of the 3.1 billion letters in the human genome -- the complete instructions for making a human being.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/...

“I support Cystic Fibrosis.”

Level 4

Since: Jul 13

Location hidden

#19 Jul 18, 2013
Chuck wrote:
<quoted text>
Read up on your mutation idiot.
Scientists said yesterday that they have discovered a tiny genetic mutation that largely explains the first appearance of white skin in humans tens of thousands of years ago, a finding that helps solve one of biology's most enduring mysteries and illuminates one of humanity's greatest sources of strife.
The work suggests that the skin-whitening mutation occurred by chance in a single individual after the first human exodus from Africa, when all people were brown-skinned. That person's offspring apparently thrived as humans moved northward into what is now Europe, helping to give rise to the lightest of the world's races.
Leaders of the study, at Penn State University, warned against interpreting the finding as a discovery of "the race gene." Race is a vaguely defined biological, social and political concept, they noted, and skin color is only part of what race is -- and is not.
In fact, several scientists said, the new work shows just how small a biological difference is reflected by skin color. The newly found mutation involves a change of just one letter of DNA code out of the 3.1 billion letters in the human genome -- the complete instructions for making a human being.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/...
LOL I did not feel like explaining that to that low IQ idiot.

They can not explain why blacks are the only mammals with kinky hair so they resort to chimping it is quite hilarious.
lawls

Voorhees, NJ

#23 Jul 18, 2013
your right man lemme i only date white women let my offspring evolve a little right??
blue eyes

Johannesburg, South Africa

#25 Jul 18, 2013
o-h-r-e-a-l-l-y wrote:
<quoted text>It bothers them because they hate everything about themselves. All their chest beating and foot stomping is just their way of feeling better about being colored.
Deep down they adore and worship whites,we all know this.They just beat their chest out of anger and their inherent assumption that whitey be raciz.You know very well all they want is to intergrate and mix with whitey.Because they cannot enjoy this priviledge in its entirety,they resort to chest pumping and other forms of buffonery
They do love being coloreds,no one is proud of their light skin than the AA's,you must hear them when they talk with Africans about it.
Chuck

United States

#26 Jul 18, 2013
obsolete farm equipment wrote:
<quoted text>
Stupid monkey, I am well versed in the subject...
My point was a retort to the typically ill-educated sub-Saharan slave-descendant, who claimed superiority of Whites due to pigmentation, in fact you have done my work for me, as your input states that Whites ARE NOT the result of the same pigmentation process as other mammals...ergo, we are far removed from other mammals too.
My fact is still a fact, the first 'humans' had pink skin, just as gorillas and chimps do today under their hair...shit-skin is a mutation in response to hair thinning....you dumb smelly ape...
The work suggests that the skin-whitening mutation occurred by chance in a single individual after the first human exodus from Africa, when all people were brown-skinned.

Obviously you don't comprehend very well, cracker. Humans never had pink skin, you're the results of a genetic mutations. Your present form isn't original in the slightest.

“Take the kinks out ya mind”

Level 4

Since: Jul 13

and not your hair

#27 Jul 18, 2013
blue eyes wrote:
<quoted text>
Deep down they adore and worship whites,we all know this.They just beat their chest out of anger and their inherent assumption that whitey be raciz.You know very well all they want is to intergrate and mix with whitey.Because they cannot enjoy this priviledge in its entirety,they resort to chest pumping and other forms of buffonery
They do love being coloreds,no one is proud of their light skin than the AA's,you must hear them when they talk with Africans about it.
Could it be that you just want us to want to be like ya'll? I honestly don't know many AA that want to be white, now there are some that favor lighter skin, but that on a black person, their not favoring pale skin. There are light skin people that are 100% black in Africa. There are 36 shades of black from high yellow to blue black and it is all beautiful. Stop coming here to flatter yourselves, I think it's rude of you to speak that way of my race to make yourself feel better. If you have self-esteem issues there are people that get degrees for your kind, it won't help you by tearing down a group of people you really don't know. It's really not worth it, there's plenty of way to fix an ugly face, a fat body, and bad skin, but there's only one way to fix a bad attitude, start with the man in the mirror.
Chuck

United States

#28 Jul 18, 2013
I see triplets wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL I did not feel like explaining that to that low IQ idiot.
They can not explain why blacks are the only mammals with kinky hair so they resort to chimping it is quite hilarious.
You could've explained it to him and it still wouldn't have got it. It passionately believes "homosexual sapiens" started off as pink.LOL..
Chuck

United States

#29 Jul 18, 2013
Typo * homosapiens
No Limit Cracker

Korea

#30 Jul 18, 2013
Isn't it strange how the Negro is so "superior" to their Human Masters, but they've never done anything other than be our slaves and still live the same way they did a thousand years ago?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
White Woman Marries A Dog 6 min black god 2
How do you feel about black women with white me... (Aug '13) 10 min SadButTrue 26
Hebrew Israelite (Feb '11) 13 min Glimmer 110,175
Power Bottoms 14 min honeybee 3
the moors were black africans not arabs!!! (Jun '08) 20 min Gmoney 31,255
All women prefer white men 21 min SadButTrue 2,686
White US children will be minorities by 2020 af... 25 min TheOriginalDoby 43
Jessie Washington Lynching 1 hr Logic 49
More from around the web