You are at RISK for having the AIDS V...

You are at RISK for having the AIDS VIRUS if:

Posted in the African-American Forum

First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Level 7

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#1 Oct 4, 2012
"Do not give blood if you are at risk for getting and spreading the AIDS virus. According to the Food and Drug Administration, you are at risk if:

you are a male who has had sex with another male since 1977, even once

you have been given money or drugs for sex since 1977

you were born in or lived in (for more than one year) Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Ni*er, or N*geria since 1977

you received blood transfusions or medical treatment with a blood product in any of these countries since 1977

you had sex with anyone who was born in or lived in any of these countries since 1977"

Level 7

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#2 Oct 4, 2012
now tell me, anyone who believes AIDS is NOT MAN MADE and that it has been around since at least the 19th century, that the US govenment uses 1977 as the starting point?

Level 7

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#4 Oct 4, 2012
ohReally __-__-__-_ wrote:
I'm more interesting in
How the fk do "ignorant pink genetic mutants" deploy bioweapons against their intellectual and physical "superiors"...?
you are SATAN'S SPAWN; evil comes naturally for your race

Level 7

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#8 Oct 4, 2012
ohReally __-__-__-_ wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, so "the white man" gets his scientific abilities from the devil. I see.
Meanwhile, the "gods" still live in mud huts and shower in cow piss.
I get it.
of course nobody has ever labeled the Devil and his minions as dumb. usually they are also very arrogant and of course pure evil.

Since: Oct 09

Location hidden

#9 Oct 4, 2012
So tell me this Jack why hasn't the HIV killed ff half the black population yet if it was made to kill us? All we do is multiply!

aZiya

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#10 Oct 4, 2012
sassyntrashy wrote:
So tell me this Jack why hasn't the HIV killed ff half the black population yet if it was made to kill us? All we do is multiply!
You answered your own question. We multiply faster than it kills us.
The real answer is there's a higher power No matter what they do they cnt get rid of us. We're the first and will be the last.

Level 7

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#11 Oct 4, 2012
sassyntrashy wrote:
So tell me this Jack why hasn't the HIV killed ff half the black population yet if it was made to kill us? All we do is multiply!
AIDS has decimated Africa, what Aziya says is correct but millions of Africans, black africans, have been eliminated over the last 35 years because of this virus, what is worse is that is has destablized these black countries that had just become independant from Europe in the 1960's. Some coincidence, eh?

Level 7

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#12 Oct 4, 2012
judging from these ratings somebody is very scared that this information will get out to the masses.

aZiya

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#13 Oct 4, 2012
Jack 300 wrote:
<quoted text>AIDS has decimated Africa, what Aziya says is correct but millions of Africans, black africans, have been eliminated over the last 35 years because of this virus, what is worse is that is has destablized these black countries that had just become independant from Europe in the 1960's. Some coincidence, eh?
Mmhm real interesting
gibs me reprashins

Saint Louis, MO

#15 Oct 4, 2012
Jack 300 wrote:
"Do not give blood if you are at risk for getting and spreading the AIDS virus. According to the Food and Drug Administration, you are at risk if:
you are a male who has had sex with another male since 1977, even once
you have been given money or drugs for sex since 1977
you were born in or lived in (for more than one year) Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Ni*er, or N*geria since 1977
you received blood transfusions or medical treatment with a blood product in any of these countries since 1977
you had sex with anyone who was born in or lived in any of these countries since 1977"
You negro retard, the year is a best 'guess' based on a risk assessment of the proliferation since it was exposed of the global society. The first case - a negro Haitian goes back even further tot he fifties, a safer bet would be to say no blood transfusions at all couldn't they?

The rationalization of the the disease is because that is where it started - like all disease there is a starting point and Africa has been home to many nasty diseases for millenniums.

Are you really saying that all non-Africans are immune to this African specific disease? So why are so many non-blacks also dying from it? China has a HUGE problem with it and they are only now admitting to it.

Fact is that any biological weapon is fraught with difficulties, the world is a lab and full of so many variables that no one would release a viral pathogen because it WILL mutate, this is the main reason why the west stopped ANY plan to disperse bio-weapons, it is too dangerous.

Deep, deep down there is nothing more I would like than to know or believe that we have created race specific weapons targeting negroes - but sadly we are not, any good research shows this.

The disease started in Africa because some coon fcked or ate an infected monkey, we know that there are similarities with HIV and SIV and that disease can mutate from one species to another - that's what flu is all about.

You nigguhs are just pissed because you have sown the seeds of your own destruction.

Another thing about AIDS is that it is an ineffective 'weapon' you need to exchange body fluids at some level to transmit the disease, if negroes were more fussy about who they screwed, weren't irresponsibly promiscuous and used condoms more often then HIV wouldn't be as big a problem as it is.

Africans have more of the worlds AIDS because they do nothing all day long but fck each other unprotected. If the feral savages used condoms and only fckd their partner then there would not be so many dead negroes.

Africa has high AIDS because Africans are backward, feral savages, not because cracker scientists designed a bio-weapon - I wish they would though....

Since: Oct 09

Location hidden

#16 Oct 4, 2012
Jack 300 wrote:
<quoted text>
AIDS has decimated Africa, what Aziya says is correct but millions of Africans, black africans, have been eliminated over the last 35 years because of this virus, what is worse is that is has destablized these black countries that had just become independant from Europe in the 1960's. Some coincidence, eh?
I just don't believe that white people have the power to create such a deadly disease.

Since: Oct 09

Location hidden

#17 Oct 4, 2012
aZiya wrote:
<quoted text>You answered your own question. We multiply faster than it kills us.
The real answer is there's a higher power No matter what they do they cnt get rid of us. We're the first and will be the last.
Sorry but the3 first to come will always be the first too go!

Level 7

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#18 Oct 4, 2012
gibs me reprashins wrote:
<quoted text>
You negro retard, the year is a best 'guess' based on a risk assessment of the proliferation since it was exposed of the global society. The first case - a negro Haitian goes back even further tot he fifties, a safer bet would be to say no blood transfusions at all couldn't they?
The rationalization of the the disease is because that is where it started - like all disease there is a starting point and Africa has been home to many nasty diseases for millenniums.
Are you really saying that all non-Africans are immune to this African specific disease? So why are so many non-blacks also dying from it? China has a HUGE problem with it and they are only now admitting to it.
Fact is that any biological weapon is fraught with difficulties, the world is a lab and full of so many variables that no one would release a viral pathogen because it WILL mutate, this is the main reason why the west stopped ANY plan to disperse bio-weapons, it is too dangerous.
Deep, deep down there is nothing more I would like than to know or believe that we have created race specific weapons targeting negroes - but sadly we are not, any good research shows this.
The disease started in Africa because some coon fcked or ate an infected monkey, we know that there are similarities with HIV and SIV and that disease can mutate from one species to another - that's what flu is all about.
You nigguhs are just pissed because you have sown the seeds of your own destruction.
Another thing about AIDS is that it is an ineffective 'weapon' you need to exchange body fluids at some level to transmit the disease, if negroes were more fussy about who they screwed, weren't irresponsibly promiscuous and used condoms more often then HIV wouldn't be as big a problem as it is.
Africans have more of the worlds AIDS because they do nothing all day long but fck each other unprotected. If the feral savages used condoms and only fckd their partner then there would not be so many dead negroes.
Africa has high AIDS because Africans are backward, feral savages, not because cracker scientists designed a bio-weapon - I wish they would though....
took you a while to type out the above bullshyt, didnt it? Let us know why 1977 is the target year for the Food and Drug administration? What happened in Africa in 1977? Smallpox vaccinations perhaps? to millions of black Africans? Could it be that since there is no proof/evidence of AIDS ANYWHERE on this planet BEFORE 1977, that these smallpox vaccinations given to those specific african countries listed were LACED with HIV? And that this is the origin of AIDS?

Do I have to post the AIDS contract on THIS THREAD as well?

Level 7

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#19 Oct 4, 2012
maybe this will help:
Smallpox vaccine 'triggered Aids virus'
London Times | MAY 11, 1987
PEARCE WRIGHT, SCIENCE EDITOR
The Aids epidemic may have been triggered by the mass vaccination campaign which eradicated smallpox. The World Health Organization, which masterminded the 13-year campaign, is studying new scientific evidence suggesting that immunization with the smallpox vaccine Vaccinia awakened the unsuspected, dormant human immuno defence virus infection (HIV).
Some experts fear that in obliterating one disease, another disease was transformed from a minor endemic illness of the Third World into the current pandemic. While doctors now accept that Vaccinia can activate other viruses, they are divided about whether it was the main catalyst to the Aids epidemic.
But an adviser to WHO who disclosed the problem, told The Times:'I thought it was just a coincidence until we studied the latest findings about the reactions which can be caused by Vaccinia. Now I believe the smallpox vaccine theory is the explanation to the explosion of Aids.''In obliterating one disease, another was transformed.'
Further evidence comes from the Walter Reed Army Medical Centre in Washington. While smallpox vaccine is no longer kept for public health purposes, new recruits to the American armed services are immunized as a precaution against possible biological warfare. Routine vaccination of a 19-year-old recruit was the trigger for stimulation of dormant HIV virus into Aids.
This discovery of how people with subclinical HIV infection are at risk of rapid development of Aids as a vaccine-induced disease was made by a medical team working with Dr Robert Redfield at Walter Reed. The recruit who developed Aids after vaccination had been healthy throughout high school. He was given multiple immunizations, followed by his first smallpox vaccination.
Two and a half weeks later he developed fever, headaches, neck stiffness and night sweats. Three weeks later he was admitted to Walter Reed suffering from meningitis and rapidly developed further symptoms of Aids and died after responding for a short time to treatment. There was no evidence that the recruit had been involved in any homosexual activity.
In describing their discovery in a paper published in the New England Journal of Medicine a fortnight ago, the Walter Reed team gave a warning against a plan to use modified versions of the smallpox vaccine to combat other diseases in developing countries.
Other doctors who accept the connection between the anti-smallpox campaign and the Aids epidemic now see answers to questions which had baffled them. How, for instance, the Aids organism, previously regarded by scientists as 'weak, slow and vulnerable,' began to behave like a type capable of creating a plague.
Many experts are reluctant to support the theory publicly because they believe it would be interpreted unfairly as criticism of WHO. In addition, they are concerned about the impact on other public health campaigns with vaccines, such as against diptheria and the continued use of Vaccinia in potential Aids research.

Level 7

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#21 Oct 4, 2012
"The coincidence between the anti-smallpox campaign and the rise of Aids was discussed privately last year by experts at WHO. The possibility was dismissed on grounds of unsatisfactory evidence. Advisors to the organization believed then that too much attention was being focussed on Aids by the media.
It is now felt that doubts would have risen sooner if public health authorities in Africa had more willingly reported infection statistics to WHO. Instead, some African countries continued to ignore the existence of Aids even after US doctors alerted the world when the infection spread to the United States.
However, as epidemiologists gleaned more information about Aids from reluctant Central African countries, clues began to emerge from the new findings when examined against the wealth of detail known about smallpox as recorded in the Final Report of the Global Commission for the Certification of Smallpox Eradication.
The smallpox vaccine theory would account for the position of each of the seven Central African states which top the league table of most-affected countries; why Brazil became the most afflicted Latin American country; and how Haiti became the route for the spread of Aids to the US. It also provides an explanation of how the infection was spread more evenly between males and females in Africa than in the West and why there is less sign of infection among five to 11-year-olds in Central Africa.
Although no detailed figures are available, WHO information indicated that the Aids league table of Central Africa matches the concentration of vaccinations. The greatest spread of HIV infection coincides with the most intense immunization programmes , with the number of people immunised being as follows: Zaire 36,878,000; Zambia 19,060,000; Tanzania 14,972,000; Uganda 11,616,000; Malawai 8,118,000; Ruanda 3,382,000 and Burundi 3,274,000.

Level 7

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#22 Oct 4, 2012
Brazil, the only South American country covered in the eradication campaign, has the highest incidence of Aids in that region. About 14,000 Haitians, on United Nations secondment to Central Africa, were covered in the campaign. They began to return home at a time when Haiti had become a popular playground for San Francisco homosexuals.
Dr Robert Gello, who first identified the Aids virus in the US, told The Times:'The link between the WHO programme and the epidemic in Africa is an interesting and important hypothesis.'I cannot say that it actually happened, but I have been saying for some years that the use of live vaccines such as that used for smallpox can activate a dormant infection such as HIV.'No blame can be attached to WHO, but if the hypothesis is correct it is a tragic situation and a warning that we cannot ignore.'
Aids was first officially reported from San Francisco in 1981 and it was about two years later before Central African states were implicated. It is now known that these states had become a reservoir of Aids as long ago as the later 1970s.
Although detailed figures of Aids cases in Africa are difficult to collect, the more than two million carriers, and 50,000 deaths, estimated by the World Health Organization are concentrated in the Countries where the smallpox immunization programme was most intensive. The 13-year eradication campaign ended in 1980, with the saving of two million lives a year and 15 million infections. The global saving from eradication has been put at dollars 1,000 million a year.
Charity and health workers are convinced that millions of new Aids cases are about to hit southern Africa. After a meeting of 50 experts near Geneva this month it was revealed that up to 75 million, one third of the population, could have the disease within the next five years.
Some organizations which have closely studied Africa, such as War on Want, believe that South Africa's black population, so far largely protected from the disease, could be most affected as migrant workers bring it into the country from the worst hit areas further north. The apartheid policy, they predict, will intensify its outbreak by confining the groups into comparatively small, highly populated towns where it will be almost impossible to contain its spread.

Level 7

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#24 Oct 4, 2012
Note for the mathematically challenged: 1977 is within 5 to 10 years of 1969:

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS FOR 1970
United States Senate Library
HEARINGS before a SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Ninety-First Congress
First Session
Subcommittee on Department of Defense
George H. Mahon, Texas, Chairman
Robert L.F. Sikes, Florida, Glenard P. Lipscomb, California
Jamie D. Whitten, Mississippi William E. Minshall, Ohio
George W. Andrews, Alabama, John J. Rhodes, Arizona
Daniel J. Flood, Pennsylvania Glenn R. Davis, Wisconsin
John M. Slack, West Virginia, Joseph P. Addabbo, New York
Frank E. Evans, Colorado
Temporarily assigned H.B. 15090
PART 5
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION
Department of the Army
Statement of Director, Advanced Research Project Agency
Statement of Director, Defense Research and Engineering
__________
Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
WASHINGTON : 1969
UNITED STATES SENATE LIBRARY
129
TUESDAY, JULY 1, 1969
SYNTHETIC BIOLOGICAL AGENTS
There are two things about the biological agent field I would like to mention. One is the possibility of technological surprise. Molecular biology is a field that is advancing very rapidly and eminent biologists believe that within a period of 5 to 10 years it would be possible to produce a synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired.
MR. SIKES. Are we doing any work in that field?
DR. MACARTHUR. We are not.
MR. SIKES. Why not? Lack of money or lack of interest?
DR. MACARTHUR. Certainly not lack of interest.
MR. SIKES. Would you provide for our records information on what would be required, what the advantages of such a program would be. The time and the cost involved?
DR. MACARTHUR. We will be very happy to. The information follows:
The dramatic progress being made in the field of molecular biology led us to investigate the relevance of this field of science to biological warfare. A small group of experts considered this matter and provided the following observations:
1. All biological agents up the the present time are representitives of naturally occurring disease, and are thus known by scientists throughout the world. They are easily available to qualified scientists for research, either for offensive or defensive purposes.
2. Within the next 5 to 10 years, it would probably be possible to make a new infective microorganism which could differ in certain important aspects from any known disease-causing organisms. Most important of these is that it might be refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon when we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease.
3. A research program to explore the feasibility of this could be completed in approximately 5 years at a total cost of $10 million.
4. It would be very difficult to establish such a program. Molecular biology is a relatively new science. There are not many highly competent scientisis in the field., almost all are in university laboratories, and they are generally adequately supported from sources other than DOD. However, it was considered possible to initiate an adequate program through the National Academy of sciences - National Research Council (NAS-NRC, and tentative plans were made to initiate the program. However decreasing funds in CB, growing criticism of the CB program., and our reluctance to involve the NAS NRC in such a controversial endeavor have led us to postpone it for the past 2 years.

Level 7

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#25 Oct 4, 2012
"It is a highly controversial issue and there are many who believe such research should not be undertaked lest it lead to yet another method of massive killing of large populations. On the other hand, without the sure scientific knowledge that such a weapon is possible, and an understanding of the ways it could be done. there is little that can be done to devise defensive measures. Should an enemy develop it there is little doubt that this is an important area of potential military technological inferiority in which there is no adequate research program."

aZiya

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#26 Oct 4, 2012
sassyntrashy wrote:
<quoted text>Sorry but the3 first to come will always be the first too go!
you cnt be serious

Odinist

“Viking.”

Level 2

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#28 Oct 4, 2012
aZiya wrote:
<quoted text>You answered your own question. We multiply faster than it kills us.
The real answer is there's a higher power No matter what they do they cnt get rid of us. We're the first and will be the last.
You multiply and spread aids to your offspring.

Few nukes and Africa is no more.

Are you a catholic?

Nukes donĀ“t care what your religion is.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 5 min No Surprize 1,642,749
Robert Mueller reportedly giving up on the coll... 9 min THX Whip Cracker 10
Why do you black people hate all white people? (Jan '17) 10 min DieofCancerwhites 128
Who was going to stop slavery? 10 min MASTER WHITE 5
Is it ignorance and stupidity to say leave slav... 17 min Spinning 360 waves 2
John Conyers sexual harassment 24 min Reymundo Mejia Gu... 2
Why do people say racist white guys have sex wi... 41 min Dixieeland 74
Why do black girls get with white guys? 57 min Dixieeland 94
Everyday I thank the Lord I am Black!! 2 hr bluestreak returns 325
Why is the media pushing interracial relationsh... (Sep '14) 3 hr Dixieeland 839
I need proof that the Ancient Egyptians Were No... (Oct '07) 6 hr dreamhunk 36,488
More from around the web