White girls are just UGLY! deal with it!

Created by B-MAL on Apr 29, 2008

757 votes

Click on an option to vote

They have nothing i like

Does disgusting sexual acts

Open to anything

I hate their kinky lifestyles

Their gold diggers

Just stay away from me!

Jade

Blackburn, UK

#419 Jun 26, 2014
Deal with it black woman have no shape just a fat tub of lard
Jade

Blackburn, UK

#420 Jun 26, 2014
Bet most of you black girls feel anger when u c a gorgeous blue eyed blonde hair beauty
The Black Messiah

Redondo Beach, CA

#422 Jun 26, 2014
Jade wrote:
Bet most of you black girls feel anger when u c a gorgeous blue eyed blonde hair beauty
Why would they? What we are seeing with somebody who has blonde hair and blue eyes is somebody with a genetic abnormality.

“Nothing but the TRUTH!”

Since: Jun 14

Earth, Milky Way galaxy

#423 Jun 26, 2014
The Black Messiah wrote:
<quoted text>
Why would they? What we are seeing with somebody who has blonde hair and blue eyes is somebody with a genetic abnormality.
Does this woman have a "genetic abnormality"?

http://realhistoryww.com/world_history/ancien...

Do I have a genetic abnormality?(I have brown eyes and black hair)
The Black Messiah

Redondo Beach, CA

#424 Jun 26, 2014
Fantastico wrote:
<quoted text>
Does this woman have a "genetic abnormality"?
http://realhistoryww.com/world_history/ancien...
Do I have a genetic abnormality?(I have brown eyes and black hair)
Not as severe as a blue eyed blonde, but that pale skin is a distinct genetic disadvantage as compared to skin with at least enough melanin to give a slight tan coloring to the skin. Humans are not meant to be pale skinned. The existence of pale skin in humans is due to a mutation, not evolution.

“Nothing but the TRUTH!”

Since: Jun 14

Earth, Milky Way galaxy

#425 Jun 26, 2014
The Black Messiah wrote:
<quoted text>
Not as severe as a blue eyed blonde, but that pale skin is a distinct genetic disadvantage as compared to skin with at least enough melanin to give a slight tan coloring to the skin. Humans are not meant to be pale skinned. The existence of pale skin in humans is due to a mutation, not evolution.
I have a bit of a "yellowish" colour (I might have an igbo great-grandparent), and I have survived in the Turkish desert for 5 hours without sunscreen back in 2000. So I guess I'm not a "defect"?
Cha

United States

#426 Jun 26, 2014
JNA21 wrote:
I don't think they're that ugly, but I do like black women a little bit better.
Blackwomen!...RUN! And DON'T look back . Run for your life. Run and DON'T be to TRUSTING; RUN-Nah!
Cha

United States

#428 Jun 26, 2014
Jade wrote:
Bet most of you black girls feel anger when u c a gorgeous blue eyed blonde hair beauty
A blonde, AN INCOMPLETE human. Blonde hair, blue eyes, screams RECESSIVE traits; PALE, COLORLESS, and INCOMPLETE. NO 'skin melannine,...INCOMPLETE.

BRUNETTES, look WAY better. A blonde iS NO DIFFERENT than an UNCOOKED 'Roaster' vs. A 'GOLDEN BROWN' Roaster; a NORMAL human reaction would be for ones mouth to 'water' for the 'GOLDEN BROWN' Roaster vs thee pale 'UNCOOKED' one. VERY REASON why 'blue' eyed BLONDES puchase a lot of over the counter 'TAN' CREMES in the tube; for a 'GOLDEN bronze' look that THEY DON'T NOMALLY HAVE.
Cha

United States

#429 Jun 27, 2014
Cha wrote:
<quoted text>
A blonde, AN INCOMPLETE human. Blonde hair, blue eyes, screams RECESSIVE traits; PALE, COLORLESS, and INCOMPLETE. NO 'skin melannine,...INCOMPLETE.
BRUNETTES, look WAY better. A blonde iS NO DIFFERENT than an UNCOOKED 'Roaster' vs. A 'GOLDEN BROWN' Roaster; a NORMAL human reaction would be for ones mouth to 'water' for the 'GOLDEN BROWN' Roaster vs thee pale 'UNCOOKED' one. VERY REASON why 'blue' eyed BLONDES puchase a lot of over the counter 'TAN' CREMES in the tube; for a 'GOLDEN bronze' look that THEY DON'T NOMALLY HAVE.
Really- trust, black girls have nothing to envy; or is it that (YOU) would like them to IN HOPE to BUILD UP (your) ego?/smh
The Black Messiah

Redondo Beach, CA

#430 Jun 27, 2014
Fantastico wrote:
<quoted text>
I have a bit of a "yellowish" colour (I might have an igbo great-grandparent), and I have survived in the Turkish desert for 5 hours without sunscreen back in 2000. So I guess I'm not a "defect"?
Guess not! But I am not saying that white people with pale skin, blue eyes and blonde hair are themselves a defect, I am saying that those traits are a mutation and when considering what is affected, it could be considered a disorder.

Al;binism is considered a disorder, but many of the traits in "white" people are albinism of specific physical systems. The lack of ocular melanin is what causes blue eyes. It is not a "color", because all human irises are blue. When you take away the melanin, you get blue eyes. White people have less visual acuity than brown eyed people. Green eyed people have more than blue, but less than brown. Taking away levels of melanin results in the range of eye colors from very dark brown to blue with dark brown having the most melanin to blue having the least. Hair color is the same. Black hair has the most, blonde hair has the least. White skin is not a color, it is the LACK of color. That is why in very pale people their skin appears pink because that is the color of the flesh beneath the dermal layers. This is a serious disadvantage, genetically. That trait is recessive, and is being eliminated from the human gene pool along with blonde hair and blue eyes.

White skin has not EVOLVED naturally in any human population. It has been the result of mutation. That mutation is being elimninated.
The Black Messiah

Redondo Beach, CA

#431 Jun 27, 2014
Cha wrote:
<quoted text>
A blonde, AN INCOMPLETE human. Blonde hair, blue eyes, screams RECESSIVE traits; PALE, COLORLESS, and INCOMPLETE. NO 'skin melannine,...INCOMPLETE.
BRUNETTES, look WAY better. A blonde iS NO DIFFERENT than an UNCOOKED 'Roaster' vs. A 'GOLDEN BROWN' Roaster; a NORMAL human reaction would be for ones mouth to 'water' for the 'GOLDEN BROWN' Roaster vs thee pale 'UNCOOKED' one. VERY REASON why 'blue' eyed BLONDES puchase a lot of over the counter 'TAN' CREMES in the tube; for a 'GOLDEN bronze' look that THEY DON'T NOMALLY HAVE.
C/S

White people are defined by what they LACK, not by anything they have. Nothing found in white people is not included in the Black genome. There is NOTHING they have which did not appear in the black population first, and is still in the black population. Their entire existence came from black people but they are mutants and no longer fully Human.
Jax

Bayside, NY

#432 Jun 27, 2014
Mack the Great wrote:
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHA! So true! Keep those pale skin genetically defect women away from me!
You are on the DL or something?
Cha

United States

#433 Jun 27, 2014
Swagga wrote:
<quoted text>
Why is that? Why see color? Why not see the individual? Just asking!
Raise that question to white people who have been privilaged by a soiciety just for being white; making MANY of them feel superior towards blackpeople. Raise that question to them.

They were the ones who (set the ball in motion) when it comes to racism. In addition, also raise that question to other 'FRUIT LOOTS' from out of other racial groups who are TRYING to FOLLOW SUITE of white people nonsense of racism; LIKEWISE...raise that question to them as well; NOT to blackpeople.
Logicalism

United States

#434 Jun 27, 2014
The Black Messiah wrote:
<quoted text>
Guess not! But I am not saying that white people with pale skin, blue eyes and blonde hair are themselves a defect, I am saying that those traits are a mutation and when considering what is affected, it could be considered a disorder.
Al;binism is considered a disorder, but many of the traits in "white" people are albinism of specific physical systems. The lack of ocular melanin is what causes blue eyes. It is not a "color", because all human irises are blue. When you take away the melanin, you get blue eyes. White people have less visual acuity than brown eyed people. Green eyed people have more than blue, but less than brown. Taking away levels of melanin results in the range of eye colors from very dark brown to blue with dark brown having the most melanin to blue having the least. Hair color is the same. Black hair has the most, blonde hair has the least. White skin is not a color, it is the LACK of color. That is why in very pale people their skin appears pink because that is the color of the flesh beneath the dermal layers. This is a serious disadvantage, genetically. That trait is recessive, and is being eliminated from the human gene pool along with blonde hair and blue eyes.
White skin has not EVOLVED naturally in any human population. It has been the result of mutation. That mutation is being elimninated.
You're speaking from the point of view of someone living in a sunny environment like California, or Africa. Go look at the environment in northern Europe. It's furthest from the sun and thus people need much lighter skin to get the UV rays in and thus help create vitamin D. The further south you go, the darker the [indigenous] people typically get, and this is because the further south you go, the closer to the sun the Earth is, until you finally hit the equator, which is closest to the sun. People have gotten "perma-tans" by living closer and closer to the equator, and then passed that UV ray shielding (melanin) down to others in their genepool.

This is all about adaptation. White people survived enough to consistently reproduce up in northern Europe, so they're not a "defect" or else they would have died out a looooooooong time ago and we'd have never seen them to begin with. In their own environment, they're not a defect. Maybe in strong sunny environments, like Florida, Texas, Brazil, etc., the ones who do not tan but instead they burn red? They're like fish out of water. Yes. Not denying that. It's still not a defect, just like fish dying outside of water does not mean "fish are a defect" - of course not. They just need to go back to their indigenous environment, that's all. ;)
The Black Messiah

Redondo Beach, CA

#435 Jun 27, 2014
Logicalism wrote:
<quoted text>
You're speaking from the point of view of someone living in a sunny environment like California, or Africa. Go look at the environment in northern Europe. It's furthest from the sun and thus people need much lighter skin to get the UV rays in and thus help create vitamin D.
This is a commonly used misconception. The adaptation to areas which get less sun does NOT result in lighter skin necessarily. The Eskimos are dark skinned and they have been in the Arctic longer than white people have existed. Vitamin D will be produced in higher amounts in people with lighter skin, but also will leach calcium from the bones and cause a deficiency later in life resulting in osteoperosis and brittle bones. White people suffer from osteoperosis more than any other people. More plausible is the millenia that western Europeans lived in caves during the last ice age. Like all primarily cave dwelling organisms, a mutation occurs which turns off melanin production. This happened for "white people" about 5000 years ago. White skin is only that old. It is the result of a MUTATION, not adaptation or evolution.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/01/...
The further south you go, the darker the [indigenous] people typically get, and this is because the further south you go, the closer to the sun the Earth is, until you finally hit the equator, which is closest to the sun. People have gotten "perma-tans" by living closer and closer to the equator, and then passed that UV ray shielding (melanin) down to others in their genepool.
Again, a misconception. Humans ORIGINATED near the equator, and moved northward, LOSING their skin color. These perceptions are subtle and intentional by white "scientists" whose agenda is to elevate the importance of white people in the evolution of Man. White people are a temporary group. They are mutants with a collection of recessive genes which WILL be eliminated from the gene pool in a relatively short period of time. Man started in equatorial Africa, and as he moved outward and northward, he LOST abilities and genetic traits to create all non-black people. Only the black genome is complete.
This is all about adaptation. White people survived enough to consistently reproduce up in northern Europe, so they're not a "defect" or else they would have died out a looooooooong time ago and we'd have never seen them to begin with. In their own environment, they're not a defect.
Perhaps, but most of them on earth today are NOT in their own environment. All whites living in the United States and Australia and South America do not belong in those places. Those same places are the majority of all melanoma cases which disproportionately affect white people. Then there was centuries of actual laws preventing "race mixing", which further allowed white people to maintain their recessive gene pool. Then there was apartheid, segregation, and social barriers which helped it along. But now, all of that is gone and once again the shrinkage of the "white race" has accelerated. In all the world, only 8% of the population is white. In 1950, the global white population was 25%. Today it is 8%. Calculating by attrition using the current birth/death rates for whites, those traits will be gone in about 200 years or less.
Maybe in strong sunny environments, like Florida, Texas, Brazil, etc., the ones who do not tan but instead they burn red? They're like fish out of water. Yes. Not denying that. It's still not a defect, just like fish dying outside of water does not mean "fish are a defect" - of course not. They just need to go back to their indigenous environment, that's all. ;)
You guys are clinging to "defect". When a white skinned, blue eyed blonde person is born in Africa, that is an albino. It is seen as a deformity.
UruEuWauWau

Brazil

#436 Jun 27, 2014
Mo thuv somma them hwite oomanz them be sexy them be 'ot 'ot & joli boku. ;-D
Terrence

Baytown, TX

#437 Jul 1, 2014
Most white girls are hoes in my opinion. Compared to other women white girls today are dirty and have a rep as being lowclass.
gangsta lean

Washington, DC

#438 Jul 2, 2014
The Black Messiah wrote:
<quoted text>
Guess not! But I am not saying that white people with pale skin, blue eyes and blonde hair are themselves a defect, I am saying that those traits are a mutation and when considering what is affected, it could be considered a disorder.
Al;binism is considered a disorder, but many of the traits in "white" people are albinism of specific physical systems. The lack of ocular melanin is what causes blue eyes. It is not a "color", because all human irises are blue. When you take away the melanin, you get blue eyes. White people have less visual acuity than brown eyed people. Green eyed people have more than blue, but less than brown. Taking away levels of melanin results in the range of eye colors from very dark brown to blue with dark brown having the most melanin to blue having the least. Hair color is the same. Black hair has the most, blonde hair has the least. White skin is not a color, it is the LACK of color. That is why in very pale people their skin appears pink because that is the color of the flesh beneath the dermal layers. This is a serious disadvantage, genetically. That trait is recessive, and is being eliminated from the human gene pool along with blonde hair and blue eyes.
White skin has not EVOLVED naturally in any human population. It has been the result of mutation. That mutation is being elimninated.
All physical evolution is the result of mutation you intellectual void. And Blond hair and blue eyes is still a long way from being eleminated from the gene pool moron. Consider that much of Western Europe in prehiostoric times ahd brown hair and brown eyes, Iberians being the orginal settlers in Britain, Celts and Germaincs have invaded and mixed with the orginal inhabitants hundreds of years ago and their Blue eyes etc are still prevalent. In countries like Estonia 99% of the population have Blue eyes. They still have light eyes in North Africa!And that is not going to change http://westernparadigm.wordpress.com/2008/02/... soon.

The fact is light eyes are beautiful and shine like jewels. The truth is you are jealous and deep down inside wish you could have blue eyes yourself. But as it is your misfortune, you don't!
vbgfdugsaiucguas

Chicago, IL

#439 Aug 28, 2014
i think theyre all ugly their skin is just so digusting to me
Yup

Whitby, Canada

#440 Sep 17, 2014
Mack the Great wrote:
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHA! So true! Keep those pale skin genetically defect women away from me!
The only color I see is my big white dick in my black girls mouth. Love it! Love slamming her big round ass too. So much better than white girls!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Hebrew Israelite (Feb '11) 12 min Deuteronomy 28 112,993
Biracial IS NOT black 20 min selina london 559
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 25 min John Galt 1,208,341
Black Males Targeted Asians And Indians For Hom... 37 min Masud_S_Hoghughi__ 5
Are white women attracted to black men? (Aug '06) 41 min ti amo 2011 122,902
The Moors, Egyptians and Phoenicians were not b... (Jun '14) 43 min Glimmer 1,496
Yemen's crisis worsens 46 min Wadi 52
A Bunch of Happy Black Women with Smiles on the... 1 hr johnplustwomore 58
What the hell is going on with black men? 3 hr Tyrone 84
More from around the web