We only agree on the lack of proof it was Assad who used the chemical weapons. There are other credible people who believe it was al Qaeda in the guise of Syrian rebels.<quoted text>
Assad is a ruthless dictator. He has killed thousands of people.
However, I have seen no proof he was the one who initiated the chemical weapons attack. For some reason, nobody has any proof, although they say they have. The only thing I hear is him being accused by known pathological liars.
Where's the proof?
It's just as likely Al Qaeda did it.
Putin says Al Qaeda did it.
Obama says Assad did it.
Which of the above has a history of routinely lying to you?
I think the best solution is for Putin to just go in and take the chemical weapons and secure them in Russia.
Obama is Muslim Brotherhood. Having him anywhere near them will be the same as just handing them over to Al Qaeda. There is no way I want Obama anywhere near them.
But Russia being entrusted to look after anyone's best interests besides themselves is, frankly, naïve in my opinion. No offense, but we're in a pickle and none of the alternatives are acceptable thanks to a president who has continually led from behind and truly believed he could community organize the entire world.