Englands first black Queen
First Prev
of 53
Next Last
Jeff

Framingham, MA

#1131 Sep 4, 2013
Mystery Solver wrote:
<quoted text>
So what it snows in Africa too. It's not so different.
"In fact there are even a few small ski resorts in Morocco, courtesy of the Atlas Mountains. Tunisia and Algeria got snow-laden a few years ago during a particularly cold winter. Snow even fell in the Sahara desert in 1979, but it lasted just half an hour.
Heading further Kilimanjaro; Uganda's Rwenzori Mountains and Ethiopia's Semien Mountains. But it's not enough to ski. For that, you have todanger" hours in the middle of the day.'
The paler your skin is naturally, the less melanin there is in it. Melanin is your natural protection against the damage caused by sunlight. The less of it you have, the more careful you have to be.'
'But if you have a Mediterranean skin that tans easily, you can still get skin cancer. If you have black skin, though, you won't.'
Summary; UV rays are more dangerous in Mediterranan places like in Southern France. Mediterranean people have darker skin which can handle more UV radiation but they can still get cancer, Blacks won't.
LOL!
Stupidass, the further a region is from the Equator the LOWER the UV Radiation the region gets. The Mediterranean is not anywhere NEAR the freaken Equator, meaning it has fairly LOW UV Radiation compared to the Tropics that are CLOSER to the Equator.
https://www.google.com/search...

"Most areas of Eastern and Central Europe are very cold in winter. Mountain regions, such as the Alps, are cold in winter and not particularly hot in summer. Southern Europe is generally hot in summer, but many parts are cool and wet in winter"

"Positive pressure anomalies result further enhance negative temperature anomalies and the likelihood of cold spells and blocking highs, particularly over the mid-latitudes of North America and central Asia, along with cold winters in southern Europe and East Asia (Coumou and Rahmstorf 2012)."

It snows in the Mountains of Africa, it doesn't snow in major cities, you fool. Your own freaken "sources' claim as much. South west England is NOT the tropics, and neither is the Mediterranean. People in Mediterranean can tan in the summer but during the winter they get light skinned cause the regions have harsh winters with little to no sun, idiot, that's why the natural skin color of Mediterraneans becomes light. Cause the natural skin tone of Mediterraneans can be as light as any Northerners. In fact there are many people in the Mediterranean regions with light skin, they get lighter in the winter and tan in the summer.

Europe being FAR AWAY FROM THE TROPICS with Low UV Radiation, meaning that Europe was more suited for light skinned people to survive and YOUR black skin was not. The darkest skin tones are found in tropical latitudes, while areas further from the equator with Low UV Radiations such as Europe favors lighter skin tones, as the map below clearly shows.
http://www.webexhibits.org/causesofcolor/imag...

Now look at UV Radiation world map. Europe's LOW UV Radiations means the region was more cohesive for light skinned people survival and YOUR black skin was a NOT. Humans who moved into NONE Tropical LOW UV Radiation regions like Europe and Northern Eurasia adapted to have light skin because it was more cohesive for their survival. While Humans who were in the hot tropics adapted to have dark skin to protect them for the High UV Radiation of the sun. In other words, your black skin was not cohesive for survival in LOW UV Radiation and NONE Tropical regions like Europe and Northern Eurasia.
http://eoimages.gsfc.nasa.gov/images/imagerec...

Since: Nov 12

Romania

#1132 Sep 6, 2013
LOL Those European "tropical" winters , yummmy .

:^ D

Level 6

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#1133 Sep 27, 2013
African AE wrote:
REAL COIN OF HANNIBAL:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hannibal.gif
and the worse thing is these Afronazis know they are stealing Caucasian history pretendings its their history. What a bunch of losers!
You dumb ass pink boys dont even read the info before you post a lie

This is the coin that you posted supposed to be Hannibal right
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons...

did you read the engraving on the coin do you know what image that is well it is NOT HANNIBAL This is what it is

Silver double shekel, c. 230 BC depicting the god Melqart, the Carthaginian equivalent of Herakles/ Hercules, and a war elephant

however there are no known authentic images of Hannibal and there is no proof that even Carthaginian coins such as this one show his likeness.

Pow! right in your Jaw

Hannibal was a HEBREW we already know the Hebrews and tyrians were Black people it been proven may times before

this is a mask found in Carthage
http://factsanddetails.com/media/2/20120208-P...

notice the color of the paint used to represent SKIN COLOR on the mask the color used is BROWN Earth Tone colors NOT SALT

Level 6

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#1134 Sep 27, 2013
-Piper- wrote:
<quoted text> Swarthy, yes but swarthy for the place we live in today. In Bulgaria or Northern Italy she will be "a casa".
And I don't generaly reject your opinion at all (about us being descendants from black africans) but only about the ages your statement implies. Put some ten thousand years there, erase that insanity about black kings in Europe, focus on African or World History -the real one, not some cultist "I wish" type - and we'll be more or less able to talk about it. Cheers.
Hey do you understand that the word black is NOT spelled the same way in Different languages?

In Spain BLACK SKIN means Negro right?

ok in old Anglo saxxon language Black skin meant BLACKE

In old English the word sweart means BLACK SKIN

So in modern english BLACK Skin means BLACK SKIN period

So it does not make sense to say that your Race or your moms skin color is swarthy or tawnie which means brown skin.

Now your race can have black hair and black eyes yes but I have never seen a swarthy skinned White person its an oximoronic statement dont you agree?

example the people that live in southern Europe are of mixed blood who are descendants of Turks that migrated into North Africa and Southern Europe

Hitler was of Turkish ancestory that came from north Africa

turks are a mixed Blooded people Persian Negro Black Arabs chinese etc all mixed with the turks thats why you call some of them olive complexion thats because they have a little bit of melanin in their skin because of the mixing with so many dark skin races of the East.

So in fact Aborigines lived all in your country 1000 yrs ago not that long ago the picts, gauls etc were aboriginal people Not Africans

now negro hebrews ruled the Christian kingdom called Byzantine Empire

Kip

“Brian's alter ego”

Level 7

Since: Feb 07

San Francisco, CA

#1135 Sep 27, 2013
Please refrain from speaking of any black royalty in England.

There would be mass suicides of white people all over the UK and America if this were to happen.
Jeff

Natick, MA

#1136 Sep 27, 2013
TRUTH HITMAN IS BACK wrote:
<quoted text> Hey do you understand that the word black is NOT spelled the same way in Different languages?
In Spain BLACK SKIN means Negro right?
ok in old Anglo saxxon language Black skin meant BLACKE
In old English the word sweart means BLACK SKIN
So in modern english BLACK Skin means BLACK SKIN period
So it does not make sense to say that your Race or your moms skin color is swarthy or tawnie which means brown skin.
Now your race can have black hair and black eyes yes but I have never seen a swarthy skinned White person its an oximoronic statement dont you agree?
example the people that live in southern Europe are of mixed blood who are descendants of Turks that migrated into North Africa and Southern Europe
Hitler was of Turkish ancestory that came from north Africa
turks are a mixed Blooded people Persian Negro Black Arabs chinese etc all mixed with the turks thats why you call some of them olive complexion thats because they have a little bit of melanin in their skin because of the mixing with so many dark skin races of the East.
So in fact Aborigines lived all in your country 1000 yrs ago not that long ago the picts, gauls etc were aboriginal people Not Africans
now negro hebrews ruled the Christian kingdom called Byzantine Empire
Dumbass, no such thing as 'N***' Hebrew existed cause Hebrew were NOT black, Hebrew were similar to modern Middle Easterners. The natives who were living in her country were her ancestors and they were as white as she is. The Persian were Eurasian people similar to modern Persian people today. Chinese were never racially black and neither were Arabs. The Byzantine Empire was a predominatly a European kingdom, it was not black nor related to your Sub Saharan African ancestors. Swarthy is a term used for olive complexion people typically applied to Europeans aka white folk, Near Eastern people, Asians. It was never a term used to describe racially black people. Back in those the term used to describe racially black people was 'N*****' and that term was never used to described ANY of the people your stupidass is trying to claim. Southern Europe has as little to NO African admixture as most other Europeans, and any North African admixture sure as heck was NOT sub Saharan African nor related to YOUR West Sub Saharan African ancestors. Hitler was a damn Euro aka white guy. The picts, gauls etc were freaken Europeans aka WHITE people not only 1000 yrs but over 12,000 years ago, similar to modern Europeans today, they sure as heck were NOT racially black because your black skin was not cohesive for surivial in NONE Tropical regions like Europe and Northern Eurasia where with LOW UV Radiation, you self hating idiot.

Olive complexion waswas applied toward light skinned people, it was never used to identify black people. Olive-skinned people are those who are naturally light with a slight yellowish hue that remains in their skin tone. This distinguishing aspect of the skin type is what contributes to its name and it comes in different range variations in populations. These people have olive complexions:
http://www.google.com/search...

Now stop trying to claim people who were NEVER black and had nothing to do with your West Sub Saharan Ancestors and answer the question as to WHY your stupid predictions of white people becoming enslaved, the World elite dump the U.S Dollar for a NEW GLOBAL Currency and a bunch of other idiotic nonsense claims you made DID NOT COME TRUE, No Truth Self Hating Idiot:
TRUTH HITMAN IS BACK wrote:
<quoted text>
1. america's complete down fall fiancial colapse which will cause the american Govt to attack its ctizens and put them in concentration camps, riots will happen people will DIE!-------> this will happen Dec 2012 <----- when the World elite dump the U.S Dollar for a NEW GLOBAL Currency
Jeff

Natick, MA

#1137 Sep 27, 2013
Kip wrote:
Please refrain from speaking of any black royalty in England.
There would be mass suicides of white people all over the UK and America if this were to happen.
No such thing as any 'black' royalty in England existed because no Europeans royals were black and you blacks sure as heck did not have presence in such FAR northern regions like England where you black skin was not cohesive for surivival in Europe's Low UV Radiation and None Tropical regions. Delusional Afrocentric fools.

Level 6

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#1138 Oct 15, 2013
Kip wrote:
Please refrain from speaking of any black royalty in England.
There would be mass suicides of white people all over the UK and America if this were to happen.
Here is A NEGRO RULER OF ROME named Septimus Serverus

Septimus Serverus Black Rulership of Europe begins:
Septimus Serverus Emperor of Rome 193 A.D
http://www.frenchpubagency.com/fichiers/livre...

Bust Of Septimus Severus
http://thepaolas.com/Emperors/Emperors/Septim...

Coin of Severus
http://www.emigh.org/numis/fourree/brockage-f...

Sorry Negro rulers ruled in Europe for Centuries
Jeff

Framingham, MA

#1139 Oct 15, 2013
TRUTH HITMAN IS BACK wrote:
<quoted text>Here is A NEGRO RULER OF ROME named Septimus Serverus
Septimus Serverus Black Rulership of Europe begins:
Septimus Serverus Emperor of Rome 193 A.D
http://www.frenchpubagency.com/fichiers/livre...
Bust Of Septimus Severus
http://thepaolas.com/Emperors/Emperors/Septim...
Coin of Severus
http://www.emigh.org/numis/fourree/brockage-f...
Sorry Negro rulers ruled in Europe for Centuries
Septimus Serverus was not black, you self hating dumbass. Now stop trying to claim people that were never black NOR related to your West Sub Saharan African ancestors and answer the question as to WHY your idiotic Dec 2012 prophecies of white people being enslanved did NOT come true, you crazy bell ringer of the apocalypse. Its 2013 and white people are still around, you lying piece of shit.
TRUTH HITMAN IS BACK wrote:
<quoted text>
1. america's complete down fall fiancial colapse which will cause the american Govt to attack its ctizens and put them in concentration camps, riots will happen people will DIE!-------> this will happen Dec 2012 <----- when the World elite dump the U.S Dollar for a NEW GLOBAL Currency
2. Your people and the govt will attack the hebrew Israelites and persecute us and KILL some of Us
3. Your govt will go to war with the Khazars against Iran, people will die. Then FROM the EAST Those so called UFO's that cant be stopped! yeah Jeff thats the chariots of the Most High buddy slavery for your people will be next.
SHALAM!
So what happened, you crazy bell ringer of the apocalypse? You are nothing but a lying reject who spreads fallacies, propagandistic claim, untruths and you are as big of a looney jackass as that ass clown F.S. Cherry, another black Occult Hebrew Israelite nutcase like yourself, who "predicted" Jesus was coming back in the year 2000 to slaughter all white people.
nappyhead

Houston, TX

#1140 Oct 15, 2013
Well, the original English rulers were all black. Didn't everyone know that? I don't know when they became white, but certainly they were all black firs! And that is no lie. It is not even up for discussion. You have to be too stupid to think that it is not true.

Level 3

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#1141 Apr 16, 2014
The truth!

[After Partholan's colony, Ireland was occupied by the Nemedhians, so called from their chief, Nemedh, who came from the borders of the Black Sea. Nemedh is said to have built forts, and cleared lands in the island. He engaged in fierce wars with hordes of negro sea-rovers, who came from The Formo- Africa, and were called Formosians. The sians.

Formosians, who were the third race to invade Ireland, at last overcame the Nemedhians, and possessed the land. The Nemedhians fled, and scattered to different parts of Europe. A little later some of the Nemedhians, called Firbolgs, returned to Ireland under five brothers as their chiefs, dispossessed in turn the Formosians, and divided the island into five kingdoms. These made the fourth conquest of Ireland.
The Tuatha, according to the traditions, held their own in Ireland through a long period. They were often unsuccessfully assailed by the fierce black Formosians, whom the Firbolgs had ousted. But great as was their prowess, the Tuatha also were doomed to defeat and extinction.

The various races of the Nemedhians are believed to have been of Turanian origin, and to have originally come from the interior of Africa.]
Jeff

Natick, MA

#1143 Apr 16, 2014
Mystery Solver wrote:
The truth!
[After Partholan's colony, Ireland was occupied by the Nemedhians, so called from their chief, Nemedh, who came from the borders of the Black Sea. Nemedh is said to have built forts, and cleared lands in the island. He engaged in fierce wars with hordes of negro sea-rovers, who came from The Formo- Africa, and were called Formosians. The sians.
Formosians, who were the third race to invade Ireland, at last overcame the Nemedhians, and possessed the land. The Nemedhians fled, and scattered to different parts of Europe. A little later some of the Nemedhians, called Firbolgs, returned to Ireland under five brothers as their chiefs, dispossessed in turn the Formosians, and divided the island into five kingdoms. These made the fourth conquest of Ireland.
The Tuatha, according to the traditions, held their own in Ireland through a long period. They were often unsuccessfully assailed by the fierce black Formosians, whom the Firbolgs had ousted. But great as was their prowess, the Tuatha also were doomed to defeat and extinction.
The various races of the Nemedhians are believed to have been of Turanian origin, and to have originally come from the interior of Africa.]
Full of c rapola as usual. Formosians were a mythical race who were said to be UNDER THE SEA, they were NOT racially black, delusional Afrocentric. The suppose "Nemedhians" who are believed to have been of Turanian origin were NOT from interior Africa, delusional one, because Turanians are a Turkic people from Eurasia, again NOT black people from 'Africa'. Sorry to break your Afroclownish dreams but black people were an anomaly in Ireland and most of Europe, especially Northern Europe where your black skin would not have been cohesive for your survival in Europe with its low ultraviolet radiations. Looks towards Sub Saharan Africa for black people, not in Northern Lands where blacks have historically been an anomaly, dingleberry.

Level 3

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#1144 May 7, 2014
Brown-skinned, blue-eyed, Y-haplogroup C-bearing European hunter-gatherer from Spain (Olalde et al. 2014)

More proof that the orginal Europeans were not White.

The new study La Brana 1 identifies it as ancestral in the SLC24A5 locus in which virtually all Europeans are derived. This comes in the heels of the Loschbour preprint which identified that sample from Luxembourg as also being ancestral. Taken together, it's now clear that hunter-gatherers from Mesolithic Western Europe were brown.

Curiously, it now seems that both Europe and India were (in part) inhabited by brown people and became lighter by a process of admixture + selection. The process went "all the way" in Europe, but a cline of pigmentation was sustained in India.

The other finding (not mentioned in the abstract) is that La Brana 1 belonged to Y-haplogroup C6! This is a low-frequency European clade of haplogroup C. So now, we have evidence that haplogroup C is not eastern Eurasian (as the presence of its subclades in Australia, India, East Asia, and the Americas might suggest), but a pan-Eurasian entity. It remains to be seen whether this C-in-Europe can be pushed further back in time, but finding it in Mesolithic Iberia reduces the chance that it's some random eastern Eurasian who made it to the outskirts of Europe recently.

Finally, La Brana 1 has derived alleles at loci associated with pathogen resistance. This might be important, because a common hypothesis is that Europeans developed this type of resistance during the Neolithic as they started interacting with the pathogens of domesticated species and started living in less-hygienic higher-density settlements.
Analysis of this genome in the context of other ancient samples suggests the existence of a common ancient genomic signature across western and central Eurasia from the Upper Paleolithic to the Mesolithic. The La Braña individual carries ancestral alleles in several skin pigmentation genes, suggesting that the light skin of modern Europeans was not yet ubiquitous in Mesolithic times.

HAhahahaha!
Jeff

Natick, MA

#1145 May 7, 2014
Mystery Solver wrote:
Brown-skinned, blue-eyed, Y-haplogroup C-bearing European hunter-gatherer from Spain (Olalde et al. 2014)

The new study La Brana 1 identifies it as ancestral in the SLC24A5 locus in which virtually all Europeans are derived. This comes in the heels of the Loschbour preprint which identified that sample from Luxembourg as also being ancestral. Taken together, it's now clear that hunter-gatherers from Mesolithic Western Europe were brown.
Curiously, it now seems that both Europe and India were (in part) inhabited by brown people and became lighter by a process of admixture + selection. The process went "all the way" in Europe, but a cline of pigmentation was sustained in India.
The other finding (not mentioned in the abstract) is that La Brana 1 belonged to Y-haplogroup C6! This is a low-frequency European clade of haplogroup C. So now, we have evidence that haplogroup C is not eastern Eurasian (as the presence of its subclades in Australia, India, East Asia, and the Americas might suggest), but a pan-Eurasian entity. It remains to be seen whether this C-in-Europe can be pushed further back in time, but finding it in Mesolithic Iberia reduces the chance that it's some random eastern Eurasian who made it to the outskirts of Europe recently.
Finally, La Brana 1 has derived alleles at loci associated with pathogen resistance. This might be important, because a common hypothesis is that Europeans developed this type of resistance during the Neolithic as they started interacting with the pathogens of domesticated species and started living in less-hygienic higher-density settlements.
Analysis of this genome in the context of other ancient samples suggests the existence of a common ancient genomic signature across western and central Eurasia from the Upper Paleolithic to the Mesolithic. The La Braña individual carries ancestral alleles in several skin pigmentation genes, suggesting that the light skin of modern Europeans was not yet ubiquitous in Mesolithic times.
HAhahahaha!
Doofus, having the ancestral or alanine form of SLC24A5 does not mean the individual was 'black' Sub Saharan since nearly 100% of samples of East Asians and Indigenous Americans have the ancestral form too and most of them are NOT black. So Yeah we already know that early Europeans were olive skinned EURASIAN types and NOT Sub Saharan African BLACK types, we already stated this many times, as the passage you posted above confirms, Eurasian Haplogroup C, blue eyes, and all. ;-p

"The other finding (not mentioned in the abstract) is that La Brana 1 belonged to Y-haplogroup C6! This is a low-frequency European clade of haplogroup C. So now, we have evidence that haplogroup C is not eastern Eurasian (as the presence of its subclades in Australia, India, East Asia, and the Americas might suggest), but a ---> PAN-EURASIAN <--- entity."

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 53
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 min Death of Tenzing 1,262,696
How to control a black woman 2 min Wealthy White Dude 1
Are white people aware of white privilege? 2 min sup bro 57
Why do blacks want to make babies with white wo... (Feb '12) 4 min Ho Dee Doo 208
Why are most white people racist? 4 min TranshumanX 2,068
News Why the Confederate flag flies in SC 7 min Doctor No 2,933
Black men should eradicate what's wrong about t... 12 min Will E Lynch 2
Somalis and their shameless self promotion 1 hr SHAKA 267
white women are the prettiest, black women are ... 2 hr Imgreat 240
the moors were black africans not arabs!!! (Jun '08) 2 hr Curious Me 34,896
More from around the web