Level 6

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#770 Jan 11, 2013
Bill wrote:
<quoted text>
WAHAHAHAHAHA!
Dude, MacRitchie (and Shore) were FANTACISTS. He believed that faeries, yes FAERIES, inhabited ancient Britain:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_MacRitchie
Scotland was never ruled by black people, that is patently absurd and has absolutely 0% evidence. "Tall dark stranger" has no racial connotation whatsoever, it was a term used to describe caucasians with dark hair and brown eyes.
Quoting MacRitchie as if you're quoting a legitimate historian or anthropologist illustrates perfectly how bereft of credibility you are.
More from scholars

Our Darker Forefathers. 1 1 1
http://archive.org/stream/originofanglosax00s...

This book also describes blacks as ruling Europe by Thomas Shore

The consideration of the evidence that people of
brunette complexions were among the Anglo-Saxon
settlers in England leads on to that of people of a still
darker hue, the dark, black, or brown-black settlers.
Probably there must have been some of these among
the Anglo-Saxons.

HE said BLACK DARK BROWN Settlers it said nothing no indication that is talking about these peoples hair color.

Origin of the Anglo-Saxon Race. io6


There is, in addition,
evidence that points to Norwegians of a brunette appear-
ance as another source whence brown-complexioned people
may have come into England.

On the south-east coast of
Norway, and here and there on the coast farther north, a
population is met with which differs from the usual
Norwegian type, and this has been referred by anthro-
pologists to a very ancient settlement there of the pre-
historic brown race that survives in the highlands of
Central Europe, and is known as the brown Alpine race.

HE also said that a BROWN SKIN RACE different from MODERN DAY EUROS lived in Norway called the BROWN ALPINE RACE

THATS not speaking about the hair its talking about the SKIN

Quote n8 Origin of the Anglo-Saxon Race.

we can point in England to the fact that broad skulls are found
in Anglo-Saxon graves, and to the historical fact that
there were brown people in England during the Anglo-
Saxon period,

Black peoples skulls are found throughout Europe
Jake

New York, NY

#771 Jan 11, 2013
TRUTH HITMAN IS BACK wrote:
<quoted text>Well lets examine the Hunic people the huns were the people that ruled those lands right? So we can safely say that Vlad was of HUNIC ancestory.
So what did the Huns look like? Only 2 accounts still survive today by Priscus and Jordanes They said that the HUNS were NEGRO SKINN tribe of people.
This is known in the field as NOT being Vla
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons...
That is a Turkish royal not Vlad I have seen documentary's serveral and they realy dont think that is Vlad according to them there is no
surviving writtin accounts of him.
They dont even realy know when he died they say he may have died in 1476. that picture YOU showed was drawn in 1488 yrs after his Death.
The Hunic people were not kneeegrooos, stupid monkeys ass. Vlad the Impaler was no kneegroo either. If he were a kneegrooo he would have been a ghetto rat like you and he was not a ghetto rat but a powerful YT ruler who impaled none YT monkeys like on sticks after drinking their blood. Yum where do you think all those stories of Dracula drinking blood came from, monkey? Hahaha! You are so jealous of our great YT rulers cause your kneegroo ancestors have done shit to contribute to the modern world. In fact you kneeegross still live like primitives. lol

 
So you  Kneeegroo monkeys wants people to believe all these suppose "powerful" kneegroos were "all great" and "powerful rulers" outside of jungle kneegroo homelands in countries where the kneegroo didn't have much of a presence but they couldn't even pull their ancestral shithole African homelands where the kneegroo predominants into the modern ages? The kneegroo can't even build the same advanced civilizations in shithole Africa where people still live like primitive Neolithics.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
What happened, kneegroo? Did you guys turn retarded or something and stay like that ever since? Stupid kneegroo trying to lay claim to accomplishment that every one knows you had nothing to do with when kneegroos continue to live like the prehistoric jungle primitives you all are running around in loin clothes and hunting animals with spears. The advanced civilization has passed right by you kneegroos, that is why you die like drowned rats to reached the modern nations of the West where YT can provide for the kneegroo a higher life style you won't find in shithole stoneage Africa. 
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Level 6

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#772 Jan 11, 2013
Bill wrote:
<quoted text>
WAHAHAHAHAHA!
Dude, MacRitchie (and Shore) were FANTACISTS. He believed that faeries, yes FAERIES, inhabited ancient Britain:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_MacRitchie
Scotland was never perfectly how bereft of credibility you are.
I have more books from CREDIBLE HISTORIANS. THESE historians said that the celts Gauls were a aboriginal stock none white.

Celtic Myth and Legend
by Charles Squire
1905
http://www.sacred-texts.com/neu/celt/cml/inde...


Huxley: On Some Fixed Points in British Ethnology. 1871

WHO WERE THE "ANCIENT BRITONS"? Chapter 3
http://www.sacred-texts.com/neu/celt/cml/cml0...

Speculation has run somewhat wild over the question of the composition of the Early Britons. But out of the clash of rival theories there emerges one--and one only--which may be considered as scientifically established. We have certain proof of two distinct human stocks in the British Islands at the time of the Roman Conquest; and so great an authority as Professor Huxley has given his opinion that there is no evidence of any others.

The earliest of these two races would seem to have inhabited our islands from the most ancient times, and may, for our purpose, be described as aboriginal. It was the people that built the "long barrows"; and which is variously called by ethnologists the Iberian, Mediterranean, Berber, Basque, Silurian, or Euskarian race. In physique it was short, swarthy, dark-haired, dark-eyed, and long-skulled; its language belonged to the class called "Hamitic", the surviving types of which are found among the Gallas, Abyssinians, Berbers, and other North African tribes; and it seems to have come originally from some part either of Eastern, Northern, or Central Africa. Spreading thence, it was



probably the first people to inhabit the Valley of the Nile, and it sent offshoots into Syria and Asia Minor. The earliest Hellenes found it in Greece under the name of "Pelasgoi"; the earliest Latins in Italy, as the "Etruscans"; and the Hebrews in Palestine, as the "Hittites. It spread northward through Europe as far as the Baltic, and westward, along the Atlas chain, to Spain, France, and our own islands

In many countries it reached a comparatively high level of civilization, but in Britain its development must have been early checked.


READ the BOOK so these are NEGRO races according to this book

1. Iberian, Mediterranean, Berber, Basque, Silurian, or Euskarian race. In physique it was short, swarthy, dark-haired, dark-eyed, and long-skulled; its language belonged to the class called "Hamitic",

2. "Pelasgoi"; the earliest Latins in Italy, as the "Etruscans"; and the Hebrews in Palestine, as the "Hittites.


See your scholars know this BUT your mass media only pushes WHITE SURPREMACY not TRUTH

forthcoming BBC 2 documentary series “The Incredible Human Journey” recently reconstructed the face of the first modern European and it turns out to be the face of an ancient so-called “Black” African immigrant

BUST Of THE first European Found in the Carpathian mountains in Romania in 2002.
http://www.africaresource.com/rasta/wp-conten...

Quote from ARTICLE
The scientists also conceed that:
“the colour was probably darker than modern-day Europeans, reflecting a more recent African origin”

Erik Trinkaus, professor of anthropology at Washington University in Missouri, and a scientist who studied the bones in detail, stated that the jaw was the oldest, directly-dated modern human fossil.
“Taken together, the material is the first that securely documents what modern humans looked like when they spread into Europe,” he said.

Level 6

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#773 Jan 11, 2013
Jake wrote:
<quoted text>
The Hunic people were not kneeegrooos, stupid monkeys ass. Vlad the Impaler was no kneegroo either. If he were a kneegrooo he would have been a won't find in shithole stoneage Africa. 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =lHauJKLi6EIXX
You believe in DARWINISM which makes you the monkey

listen this is an example of HOW stupid your race is

1. THE dark skin nations of Earth NEVER said in their history that they came from MONKEYS or Wolves

2. your Roman Forefathers believed your race came FROM a SHE WOLF yes thats right Romulus and Remus were sucking on the TITS of a Female Wolf.

2 thousand years later your dumb race says that YOU guys came from THE PUSSY OF A MONKEY

So which is it did you come from a wolf or Monkey? if so what type of wolf or monkey did your race come from?

Jake

New York, NY

#774 Jan 11, 2013
TRUTH HITMAN IS BACK wrote:
<quoted text>
I have more books from CREDIBLE HISTORIANS. THESE historians said that the celts Gauls were a aboriginal stock none white.
Celtic Myth and Legend
by Charles Squire
1905
http://www.sacred-texts.com/neu/celt/cml/inde...
Huxley: On Some Fixed Points in British Ethnology. 1871
WHO belonged to the class called "Hamitic", the surviving types of which are found among the Gallas, Abyssinians, Berbers, and other North African tribes; and it seems to have come originally from some part either of Eastern, Northern, or Central Africa. Spreading thence, it was
probably the first people to inhabit the Valley of the Nile, and it sent offshoots into Syria and Asia Minor. The earliest Hellenes found it in Greece under the name of "Pelasgoi"; the earliest Latins in Italy, as the "Etruscans"; and the Hebrews in Palestine, as the "Hittites. It spread northward through mass media only pushes WHITE SURPREMACY not TRUTH
forthcoming BBC 2 documentary series “The Incredible Human Journey” recently reconstructed the face of the first modern European and it turns out to than modern-day Europeans, reflecting a more recent African origin”
Erik Trinkaus, professor of anthropology at Washington University in Missouri, and a scientist who studied the bones in detail, stated that the jaw was the oldest, directly-dated modern human fossil.
“Taken together, the material is the first that securely documents what modern humans looked like when they spread into Europe,” he said.
Stupid kneegrooo, those were Europeans not primitive kneegrooos like you. They were YTs and our ancestors who advanced and evolved and ushered in the Industrial Revolution and the modern age are YTs doing while you
kneegroos are stuck in the stoneages you haven't evolved that is why you can't pull yourselves out the stoneages and why you can't function in the modern world and why any places infested by you kneegroos from Africa to Haiti are undeveloped shitholes.

So you  Kneeegroo monkeys wants people to believe all these suppose "powerful" kneegroos were "all great" and "powerful rulers" outside of jungle kneegroo homelands in countries where the kneegroo didn't have much of a presence but they couldn't even pull their ancestral shithole African homelands where the kneegroo predominants into the modern ages? The kneegroo can't even build the same advanced civilizations in shithole Africa where people still live like primitive Neolithics.

What happened, kneegroo? Did you guys turn retarded or something and stay like that ever since? Stupid kneegroo trying to lay claim to accomplishment that every one knows you had nothing to do with when kneegroos continue to live like the prehistoric jungle primitives you all are running around in loin clothes and hunting animals with spears. The advanced civilization has passed right by you kneegroos, that is why you die like drowned rats to reached the modern nations of the West where YT can provide for the kneegroo a higher life style you won't find in shithole stoneage Africa. 
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Jake

New York, NY

#775 Jan 11, 2013
TRUTH HITMAN IS BACK wrote:
<quoted text> You believe in DARWINISM which makes you the monkey
listen this is an example of HOW stupid your race is
1. THE dark skin nations of Earth NEVER said in their history that they came from MONKEYS or Wolves
2. your Roman Forefathers believed your race came FROM a SHE WOLF yes thats right Romulus and Remus were sucking on the TITS of a Female Wolf.
2 thousand years later your dumb race says that YOU guys came from THE PUSSY OF A MONKEY
So which is it did you come from a wolf or Monkey? if so what type of
wolf or monkey did your race come from?
Monkeys ass, you worship our YT forefathers that is why you are in this thread trying to claim them cause deep down even you kneegroos know that you have done shit to contribute anything to the modern world. You kneegroos are ghetto infested rats.

You black wretches die each year like drowned rats to reach the advanced civilized countries of the YTs Western countries cause your kneegroo lands are such undeveloped shitholes. You apes haven't evovled from primitive stages. From all the races blacks have the lowest IQs. It's the scientific worlds dirty little secret. Scientists mumble about it underneath their breaths but don't speak openly about cause it isn't the political correct thing to do. You kneegrooos are stupid chimps and one only has to look at shithole your ancestral kneegrooo African lands are to see this. You can look all over the planet and support the claim of Low IQ among knnegrooos with daily examples of black failure, thousands of times over. You can start with a shithole like Haiti and go all the way to the shithole that black Africa has become after YT has left you chimps on your own. And the common denominator is the kneegroo and your inability to constrictively civilize and run advance  modern developed Countries with higher standard of living, that's why wretched blacks drown like rats each year trying to reach advanced civilized countries of the West. And that is why rich YT rock stars need to put together concerts to raise money to feed you black wretches. You kneegroos were undeveloped primitives who lived in mud huts and you STILL are undeveloped primitives who live in mud huts. Any place you go in black Africa you can still find you knnegroos living like you stepped right out of the stoneages. No wonder you try to claim our YT ancestros, thats cause your kneegroo ancestros still are stuck in prehistoric times wearing lion clothes and hunting animals with spears. Pathetic undeveloped kneegrooo.


"The average Kneegrooo IQ is 70". It means that black Africans have an average IQ of 70. Some put it lower at 67.

Level 6

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#776 Jan 11, 2013
Black Deal wrote:
<quoted text>
Learn about Aksum, Mutapa empire, Futa Tora, Mandingo, etc instead of your homo white history
already did that I have studied ALL of African Culture and China and Europe and the middle east.

Thats how I know who is and Israelite and who is not.

According to the The Kebra Negast Aksum could have been an Hebrews empire

The Mandingos could be hebrew as well they migrated into Ghana

Were did the HEBREWS migrate too they are black as well YOU run from that huh?

You dont like the fact that HEBREWS are black HUH?

You never comment about that for the past year you have RUN come up with excusses the whole nine yards

al this proff pointing to the FACT that HEBREW have always been BLACK
Jake

New York, NY

#777 Jan 11, 2013
Bill wrote:
And by the way, you can directly connect human remains from nearly 10,000 years ago directly to living Britons today:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheddar_Man
The oldest human remains ever discovered in Britain match directly with white people still living there today.
Black people never inhabited the British Isles, that is a complete fantasy you've concocted to boost your ethnic self-esteem.
Correct. Not one of those Europeans this dumbass kneegroo is trying to claim were black. Our European forefathers were YT. This stupid kneegroo knows his kneegroo ancestors have done shit to contribute anything to the development of the modern world that is why he is here trying to claim OUR YT European forefathers. We are talking about humans who have evovled with high IQs and created advanced developed modern nations, not chimp stone age freeloading kneegrooos who still live in jungle huts.


While most races are striving to evolve and better themselves as humans, it seems that black families are teaching their children that if they act like animals, people will fear them. To them, this IS evolution. Ignorance. Look at all them black flashmob where they attack none blacks and steal from people. You can take the kneegrrooo out of the jungle but you can't take the jungle out of the kneegroo.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Jake

New York, NY

#778 Jan 11, 2013
TRUTH HITMAN IS BACK wrote:
<quoted text>
already did that I have studied ALL of African Culture and China and Europe and the middle east.
Thats how I know who is and Israelite and who is not.
According to the The Kebra Negast Aksum could have been an Hebrews empire
The Mandingos could be hebrew as well they migrated into Ghana
Were did the HEBREWS migrate too they are black as well YOU run from that huh?
You dont like the fact that HEBREWS are black HUH?
You never comment about that for the past year you have RUN come up with excusses the whole nine yards
al this proff pointing to the FACT that HEBREW have always been BLACK
Keep dreaming, kneegrooo. You Knneeegrooos like ti claim you've been around in since the dawn of mankind and that Europeans are the youngest humans on Earth yet Europeans have colonized most of the planet and their YT descendants walked on the Moon. ALL major modern mathematical, technological and scientific accomplishments in the last few hundred years have come from European people and their YT descendants. Knneeegroos were in the stone age when we found you and many still are today. Africa is the only continent where you can go almost anywhere and still find people living in mud huts and unable to feed themselves. 


Blacks achieve NOTHING of any consequence in the modern world today. That's why your dumbass is even trying to claim our European ancestors, monkey. 

Every study ever undertaken, using whatever metric or technique always shows knneegroo to be the dumbest of all humans.

If Kneegrooos and are able to compete with Europeans, then why, after maybe a 100,000 years head start, have the kneegrooo not walked on the Moon? Invented nuclear power? Formulated Quantum, Relativity and Newtonian theories and calculus? 

Meta analysis shows that Europeans are more intelligent and more creative than the kneegrooo. Every study ALWAYS shows that kneegroos are at the bottom of the pile. You may not like it but it is the truth. You can look all over the planet and support the claim of Low IQ among knnegrooos with daily examples of black failure, thousands of times over. You can start with a shithole like Haiti and go all the way to the shithole that black Africa has become after YT has left you chimps on your own. And the common denominator is the kneegroo and your inability to constrictively civilize and run advance  modern developed Countries with higher standard of living. Case in point you can go anywhere in your kneegroo ancestral lands and find your kneegroo "bros" still living like they stepped out of the stoneages.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
motts

Kingston Upon Thames, UK

#779 Jan 11, 2013
Jake wrote:
<quoted text>
Keep dreaming, kneegrooo. You Knneeegrooos like ti claim you've been around in since the dawn of mankind and that Europeans are the youngest humans on Earth yet Europeans have colonized most of the planet and their YT descendants walked on the Moon. ALL major modern mathematical, technological and scientific accomplishments in the last few hundred years have come from European people and their YT descendants. Knneeegroos were in the stone age when we found you and many still are today. Africa is the only continent where you can go almost anywhere and still find people living in mud huts and unable to feed themselves. 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =PfsIBo0CD8QXX
Blacks achieve NOTHING of any consequence in the modern world today. That's why your dumbass is even trying to claim our European ancestors, monkey. 
Every study ever undertaken, using whatever metric or technique always shows knneegroo to be the dumbest of all humans.
If Kneegrooos and are able to compete with Europeans, then why, after maybe a 100,000 years head start, have the kneegrooo not walked on the Moon? Invented nuclear power? Formulated Quantum, Relativity and Newtonian theories and calculus? 
Meta analysis shows that Europeans are more intelligent and more creative than the kneegrooo. Every study ALWAYS shows that kneegroos are at the bottom of the pile. You may not like it but it is the truth. You can look all over the planet and support the claim of Low IQ among knnegrooos with daily examples of black failure, thousands of times over. You can start with a shithole like Haiti and go all the way to the shithole that black Africa has become after YT has left you chimps on your own. And the common denominator is the kneegroo and your inability to constrictively civilize and run advance  modern developed Countries with higher standard of living. Case in point you can go anywhere in your kneegroo ancestral lands and find your kneegroo "bros" still living like they stepped out of the stoneages.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Why failed white men like JAKE are the most dangerous animals on the planet.

This is not just referring to failure as in how much money someone makes. Hillbillies like JAKE are both social and psychological failures, and generally just plain failures as human beings, because somewhere, somehow, and at someone's hand, something went horribly wrong with Jake, which is why he commits his life to projecting all his failure onto black people.

JAKE is your basic white, uneducated loser with absolutely NOTHING going for him. JAKE therefore uses his 'white exterior' to latch onto the accomplishments of smart and successful white people in order to feel important, relevant or anything other than the low-level, broke, envious Hillbilly speck that he really is.

JAKE looks all around him and sees educated and successful black people and can't reconcile the crap he's been been fed about black people all of his pathetic hillbilly life. No wonder he spends all his sorry life trolling on a BLACK FORUM lashing out hoping it will compensate for a wasted life full of failure.

LOSERS like JAKE end up joining the the Klan or some other supremacist group that's chocked full of pedophiles, wife beaters and drug addicts and presided over by some power hungry megalomaniac, to help him get to sleep at night, deal with his failure and get all hopped up about being white. Sweet dreams until you wake up JAKEY, because guess what? You're still a failure and a troll who spends his time on a BLACK FORUM!! LOL!

One however, has to look on the bright side. It's better to have JAKE the troll take out his frustration from behind a computer than with a gun in his hand which many failed trolls like him are destined to do.

(((J.A.K.E.))) THE TROLL THAT KEEPS ON TROLLING!!
motts

Kingston Upon Thames, UK

#780 Jan 11, 2013
Jake wrote:
<quoted text>
Correct. Not one of those Europeans this dumbass kneegroo is trying to claim were black. Our European forefathers were YT. This stupid kneegroo knows his kneegroo ancestors have done shit to contribute anything to the development of the modern world that is why he is here trying to claim OUR YT European forefathers. We are talking about humans who have evovled with high IQs and created advanced developed modern nations, not chimp stone age freeloading kneegrooos who still live in jungle huts.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =PfsIBo0CD8QXX
While most races are striving to evolve and better themselves as humans, it seems that black families are teaching their children that if they act like animals, people will fear them. To them, this IS evolution. Ignorance. Look at all them black flashmob where they attack none blacks and steal from people. You can take the kneegrrooo out of the jungle but you can't take the jungle out of the kneegroo.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Why failed white men like JAKE are the most dangerous animals on the planet.

This is not just referring to failure as in how much money someone makes. Hillbillies like JAKE are both social and psychological failures, and generally just plain failures as human beings, because somewhere, somehow, and at someone's hand, something went horribly wrong with Jake, which is why he commits his life to projecting all his failure onto black people.

JAKE is your basic white, uneducated loser with absolutely NOTHING going for him. JAKE therefore uses his 'white exterior' to latch onto the accomplishments of smart and successful white people in order to feel important, relevant or anything other than the low-level, broke, envious Hillbilly speck that he really is.

JAKE looks all around him and sees educated and successful black people and can't reconcile the crap he's been been fed about black people all of his pathetic hillbilly life. No wonder he spends all his sorry life trolling on a BLACK FORUM lashing out hoping it will compensate for a wasted life full of failure.

LOSERS like JAKE end up joining the the Klan or some other supremacist group that's chocked full of pedophiles, wife beaters and drug addicts and presided over by some power hungry megalomaniac, to help him get to sleep at night, deal with his failure and get all hopped up about being white. Sweet dreams until you wake up JAKEY, because guess what? You're still a failure and a troll who spends his time on a BLACK FORUM!! LOL!

One however, has to look on the bright side. It's better to have JAKE the troll take out his frustration from behind a computer than with a gun in his hand which many failed trolls like him are destined to do.

(((J.A.K.E.))) THE TROLL THAT KEEPS ON TROLLING!!
Jeff

Natick, MA

#781 Jan 11, 2013
TRUTH HITMAN IS BACK wrote:
<quoted text>Well lets examine the Hunic people the huns were the people that ruled those lands right? So we can safely say that Vlad was of HUNIC ancestory.
So what did the Huns look like? Only 2 accounts still survive today by Priscus and Jordanes They said that the HUNS were NEGRO SKINN tribe of people.
This is known in the field as NOT being Vlad
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons...
That is a Turkish royal not Vlad I have seen documentary's serveral and they realy dont think that is Vlad according to them there is no surviving writtin accounts of him.
They dont even realy know when he died they say he may have died in 1476. that picture YOU showed was drawn in 1488 yrs after his Death.
You are so full of shit that you stick from here to China.'In the field'? HA! You don't know anything never mind whats "in the field", you are delusional demented reject who spreads lie and false predictions. Jackass, the HUNS were NOT "N*****" aka racially black, they were as white back then as they are today. The genetic, linguistic and culture heritage of the Hungarians comes from Finno-Ugric peoples. A branch of Uralic speakers migrated from their original homeland near the Ural mountains and settled in various places in eastern Europe, until they conquered the present-day area of Hungary. Genetically, the present-day Hungarian population preserves much of an older European genetic makeup, according to genetic and palaeoanthropological studies, the majority of Hungarians showed features of European biological descent people similar to modern Europeans today. Vlad was a white guy, dumbass, he was as white as all these other Europeans your self hating jackass is trying to claim. This woodcut depicting of Dracula published in Nuremberg in 1488 and its an actual depiction of what he looked like, No Truth Self Hating Reject:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons...

Now stop trying to claim people that were never black NOR related to your West Sub Saharan African ancestors and answer the question as to WHY your idiotic Dec 2012 prophecies of white people being enslanved did NOT come true, you crazy bell ringer of the apocalypse. Its 2013 and white people are still around, they aren't 'enslaved', no Israelites were attacked nor presecuted nor killed, the World elite are STILL in power and they didn't dump the US Dollar for any " NEW GLOBAL Currency", there are NO riots in the streets NO people DIED in the streets, the banking system is STILL in place, no War with Iran has started, there is NO collapse of any leader nations and they are STILL ruling the world.
Sir Jimmy Savile OBE

Sheffield, UK

#782 Jan 11, 2013
justmeagain wrote:
Queen Philippa: England's First Black Queen
England's First Black Queen, Mother of the Black Prince
Philippa was the daughter of William of Hainault, a lord in part of what is now Belgium. When she was nine the King of England, Edward II, decided that he would marry his son, the future Edward III, to her, and sent one of his bishops, a Bishop Stapeldon, to look at her. He described her thus:
"The lady whom we saw has not uncomely hair, betwixt blue-black and brown. Her head is cleaned shaped; her forehead high and broad, and standing somewhat forward. Her face narrows between the eyes, and the lower part of her face is still more narrow and slender than the forehead. Her eyes are blackish brown and deep. Her nose is fairly smooth and even, save that is somewhat broad at the tip and flattened, yet it is no snub nose. Her nostrils are also broad, her mouth fairly wide. Her lips somewhat full and especially the lower lip…all her limbs are well set and unmaimed, and nought is amiss so far as a man may see. Moreover, she is brown of skin all over, and much like her father, and in all things she is pleasant enough, as it seems to us."
Four years later, Prince Edward went to visit his bride-to-be and her family, and fell in love with her. She was betrothed to him and, in 1327, when she was only 14, she arrived in England. The next year, when she was 15, they married and were crowned King and Queen, in 1330, when she was heavily pregnant with her first child and only 17.
This first child was called Edward, like his father, but is better known as the Black Prince. Many say that he was called this because of the colour of his armour, but there are records that show that he was called 'black' when he was very small. The French called him 'Le Noir'.
Philippa was a remarkable woman. She was very wise and was known and loved by the English for her kindliness and restraint. She would travel with her husband on his campaigns and take her children as well. When the King was abroad she ruled in his absence. Queen's College in Oxford University was founded under her direction by her chaplain, Robert de Eglesfield in 1341 when she was 28. She brought many artists and scholars from Hainault who contributed to English culture.
When she died, Edward never really recovered, and she was much mourned by him and the country. King Edward had a beautiful sculpture made for her tomb which you can see today at Westminster Abbey.
http://www.fyicomminc.com/gaianews/speech38.h...
Rapist.
Jeff

Natick, MA

#783 Jan 11, 2013
TRUTH HITMAN IS BACK wrote:
<quoted text>
THATS my point you said your father has DARK HAIR not SKIN Those accounts of ancient Swarthy Europeans is NOT talking about HAIR they HAD DARK skin.
Example Greek-speaking Roman historian Priscus and Jordanes said that the HUNS were BLACK SKIN PEOPLE NOT BLACK HAIRED PEOPLE
Quote: Priscus about Atilla
1. Attila’s personal features: a short, square body with a large head; deep-seated eyes; a swarthy complexion with little facial hair. He wore plain, not luxurious, clothing.
Thats NOT speaking about your dad and his black hair swarthy just means BLACK skin unlesss specified.
Example JANE AUSTEN this is her discription by Edward Austen Leigh
and certainly not describing any one in your family. Janes description would make her look something like rihanna
http://www.cupcakestastenice.com/wp-content/u...
Brown skin hazel eyes
another example
PARSONS or PERSONS, ROBERT
Dodd in describing his personal appearance, says 'he was of middle size, his complexion rather swarthy, which, with strong features, made his countenance somewhat forbidding.
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Parsons,_Robert... (1546-1610)_(DNB00
so HIS SKIN COLOR was BLACK it said nothing about his hair color did it? NO it did not stop assuming it is talking about his hair trying to aviod the FACT that he may be a NEGRO
Again, No Truth Self Hating Reject, terms like 'swarthy, dark, brown, etc' were applied toward olive skinned people aka BRUNETTE EUROPEANS back then, NOT racially black people. Back then the term used to described someone who was racially black was N e q r o e and this term was never used to describe ANY Europeans. These are the people they meant by 'swarthy'.
http://www.google.com/search...

Jane Austen was NOT black, stupid, she was a freaken WHITE ANGLO-SAXON. She is described as a BRUNETTE, this term isn't used to describe black people but WHITE people with brown hair, olive complexion like Sean Connery or Collin Farrel. Damn you are stupid beyond belief.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jane_Austen

Robert Persons was an ENGLISH Jesuit priest, dumbass, he wasn't black but a WHITE guy.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/7d...

The Huns were not racially black people and neither was Attila the Hun racially black, stupid. The Hun were a Eurasian people, a mix between European and Asiatic Turks, you stupid ass. They were NOT black and had absolutely nothing to do with your West Sub Saharan African ancestors.

Neither Hun nor Jane Austen nor the Parsons were black. They were WHITE as all these other Europeans you stupidly are claiming and they would be rolling over in their graves LAUGHING at your stupid ass when they were as WHITE as their modern European descendants and more RACIST against your Sub Saharan African ancestors then their modern European descendants are today since THESE same European kings, rulers, etc were selling YOUR West African ancestors as slaves, you self hating moron.

Now stop trying to claim people that were never black NOR related to your West Sub Saharan African ancestors and answer the question as to WHY your idiotic Dec 2012 prophecies of white people being enslanved did NOT come true, you crazy bell ringer of the apocalypse. Its 2013 and white people are still around, they aren't 'enslaved', no Israelites were attacked nor presecuted nor killed, the World elite are STILL in power and they didn't dump the US Dollar for any " NEW GLOBAL Currency", there are NO riots in the streets NO people DIED in the streets, the banking system is STILL in place, no War with Iran has started, there is NO collapse of any leader nations and they are STILL ruling the world.
Jeff

Natick, MA

#784 Jan 11, 2013
TRUTH HITMAN IS BACK wrote:
<quoted text> More from scholars
Our Darker Forefathers. 1 1 1
http://archive.org/stream/originofanglosax00s...
This book also describes blacks as ruling Europe by Thomas Shore
The consideration of the evidence that people of
brunette complexions were among the Anglo-Saxon
settlers in England leads on to that of people of a still
darker hue, the dark, black, or brown-black settlers.
Probably there must have been some of these among
the Anglo-Saxons.
HE said BLACK DARK BROWN Settlers it said nothing no indication that is talking about these peoples hair color.
Origin of the Anglo-Saxon Race. io6
There is, in additioknown as the brown Alpine race.
HE also said that a BROWN SKIN RACE different from MODERN DAY EUROS lived in Norway called the BROWN ALPINE RACE
THATS not speaking about the hair its talking about the SKIN
Quote n8 Origin of the Anglo-Saxon Race.
we can point in England to the fact that broad skulls are found
in Anglo-Saxon graves, and to the historical fact that
there were brown people in England during the Anglo-
Saxon period,
Black peoples skulls are found throughout Europe
Wrong, No Truth Self Hating Jackass, there aren't 'black' peoples skull found throughout Europe cause the people all these Europeans you are stupidly trying to claim resemble MODERN Europeans who happen to share genetics and phenotypes with all these ancient Europeans you are dumbly trying to claim, stupid ass. The Anglo-Saxons were not black and neither were the Norwegians or any other Europeans.

Thomas William Shore was talking about Brunette Europeans like Sean Connery and Colin Farrel, he wasn't talking about black people who he would have called "N*******" the term used back then for racially black people. Shore never said anything about any "brown" ancient races of Northern Europe cause he never believed Europeans to be racially black and no "brown" races of Northern Europe existed. Europeans were not "brown/black" since at least 20,000 BC, by the time these historical Europeans your dumbass keeps trying to claim came to existance they were already WHITE. Neither did any of these sources ever claim the Anglo-Saxons, Celts, Scots, Norwegians, the Goths, the Danes, the Normans etc were "black" nor "Hebrew". The Anglo-Saxons, Celts, Scots, Norwegians, the Goths, the Danes, the Normans etc were all the SAME TYPE OF PEOPLE as in WHITE EUROPEANS are today, their descendants those SAME white Europeans in Europe today. Have you even READ the works of Shore and Huxley? They believes your " N eg r Q e" ancestors as inferior to Europeans, so they never would have claimed THEIR European ancestors, i.e. those same Anglo-Saxons, Celts, Scots, Norwegians, the Goths, the Danes, the Normans etc, as "black", you freak. Go read their works, they very clearly identified these Europeans ancestors of theirs as whites, and the term they would have used for a black person was "N ****" and no European was described as such by any of them, you delusional fruitcake.

"No rational man, cognizant of the facts, believes that the average " N e gr Qes" is the equal, still less the superior, of the white man." (Lay Sermons, Addresses, and Reviews, 1871)

Now stop trying to claim people that were never black NOR related to your West Sub Saharan African ancestors and answer the question as to WHY your idiotic Dec 2012 prophecies of white people being enslanved did NOT come true, you crazy bell ringer of the apocalypse. Its 2013 and white people are still around, they aren't 'enslaved', no Israelites were attacked nor presecuted nor killed, the World elite are STILL in power and they didn't dump the US Dollar for any " NEW GLOBAL Currency", there are NO riots in the streets NO people DIED in the streets, the banking system is STILL in place, no War with Iran has started, there is NO collapse of any leader nations and they are STILL ruling the world.
Jeff

Natick, MA

#785 Jan 11, 2013
TRUTH HITMAN IS BACK wrote:
<quoted text>
I have more books from CREDIBLE HISTORIANS. THESE historians said that the celts Gauls were a aboriginal stock none white.
Celtic Myth and Legend
http://www.sacred-texts.com/neu/celt/cml/inde...
Huxley: On Some Fixed Points in British Ethnology. 1871
WHO WERE THE "ANCIENT BRITONS"? Chapter 3
http://www.sacred-texts.com/neu/celt/cml/cml0...
Speculation has run somewhat wild over the question of the composition of the Early Britons. But out of the clash of rival theories there emerges one--and one only--which may be considered as scientifically established. We have certain proof of two distinct human stocks in the British Islands ah Europe as far a
1. Iberian, Mediterranean, Berber, Basque, Silurian, or Euskarian race. In physique it was short, swarthy, dark-haired, dark-eyed, and long-skulled; its language belonged to the class called "Hamitic",
2. "Pelasgoi"; the earliest Latins in Italy, as the "Etruscans"; and the Hebrews in ly reconstructed the face of the first modern European and it turns out to be the face of an ancient so-called “Black” African immigrant
BUST Of THE first European Found in the Carpathian mountains in Romania in 2002.
http://www.africaresource.com/rasta/wp-conten...
Quote from ARTICLE
The scientists also conceed that:
“the colour was probably darker than modern-day Europeans, reflecting a more recent African origin”
Erik Trinkaus, professor of anthropology at Washington University in Missouri, and a scientist who studied the bones in detail, stated that the jaw was the oldest, directly-dated modern human fossil.
“Taken together, the material is the first that securely documents what modern humans looked like when they spread into Europe,” he said.
You are so FULL of shit that you reek, nothing you posted above shows those Europeans to be "black" and no where are these Europeans ever described as being racially black by any of the sources you use. Darker as in olive complexion NOT racially black, stupid. Why are you even using a 'bust' of a prehistoric European when those skeleton remains date nearly 40,000 years ago and YOU are on record stupidly claiming humans came to exist only 10,000 years ago, jackass? You are so full of contradictions that you can't even keep your lies straight.

These Europeans were as white as their modern European descedants. No where to Squire OR Huxley EVER claim any Europeans as being racially black. All those the Europeans mentioned from above were historically as white as their modern European descendants are today. The Celts, Gauls, Scots, Iberians, Greeks/Hellenes/Pelasgoi, Britons, Silures, Euskarian, Basque, Scythians, Germans, Hittites, Etruscans, ect were ALL white. The term used back then for racially black people was N ! g R 3o and this term was never applied towards any Europeans. None of these European people were 'Hamatic', they were Indo-Europeans. Huxley etc were describing Blond, Red and BRUNETTE Europeans similar to modern Europeans today. NOWHERE do any of these sources you keep mentioning describe ANY Europeans as racially black, you identity confused moron. The term used to described someone who was racially black back then was N e q r o e and this term was never used to describe ANY Europeans. Why are you even using Huxley or any of these other European sources is beyond comprehension when they are on record believing YOUR Sub Saharan black African ancestors were racially inferior to all these Europeans your dumbass is trying to claim, read Huxleys racist views about black people "Professor Huxley on the N**** Question".

"No rational man, cognizant of the facts, believes that the average " N e gr Qes" is the equal, still less the superior, of the white man." (Lay Sermons, Addresses, and Reviews, 1871)
Jeff

Natick, MA

#786 Jan 11, 2013
TRUTH HITMAN IS BACK wrote:
<quoted text>
already did that I have studied ALL of African Culture and China and Europe and the middle east.
Thats how I know who is and Israelite and who is not.
According to the The Kebra Negast Aksum could have been an Hebrews empire
The Mandingos could be hebrew as well they migrated into Ghana
Were did the HEBREWS migrate too they are black as well YOU run from that huh?
You dont like the fact that HEBREWS are black HUH?
You never comment about that for the past year you have RUN come up with excusses the whole nine yards
al this proff pointing to the FACT that HEBREW have always been BLACK
HA! You haven't studied anything proven by your moronic lies in all of your posts. Now you lying self hating piece of shit, ANSWER THE QUESTION about what happened to your moronic "prediction" that white people will become enslaved come Dec. 2012?
TRUTH HITMAN IS BACK wrote:
<quoted text>
I have already told you that there are two prophecies that need to be fulfilled
1. america's complete down fall fiancial colapse which will cause the american Govt to attack its ctizens and put them in concentration camps, riots will happen people will DIE!-------> this will happen Dec 2012 <----- when the World elite dump the U.S Dollar for a NEW GLOBAL Currency
2. Your people and the govt will attack the hebrew Israelites and persecute us and KILL some of Us
3. Your govt will go to war with the Khazars against Iran, people will die. Then FROM the EAST Those so called UFO's that cant be stopped! yeah Jeff thats the chariots of the Most High buddy slavery for your people will be next.
SHALAM!
So what happened, you crazy bell ringer of the apocalypse? Its 2013, white people are still around, they aren't 'enslaved', no Israelites were attacked nor presecuted nor killed, the World elite are STILL in power and they didn't dump the US Dollar for any " NEW GLOBAL Currency", there are NO riots in the streets NO people DIED in the streets, the banking system is STILL in place, there is NO collapse of any leader nations and they are STILL ruling the world. So what happened to your predictions that were suppose to take part in Dec. 2012, liar? You are nothing but a lying reject who spreads lies, propagandistic STUPID claims, FAKE prediction, untruths and you are as big of a looney jackass as that ass clown F.S. Cherry, another black Occult Hebrew Israelite nutcase like yourself, who "predicted" Jesus was coming back in the year 2000 to slaughter all white people.
Jeff

Natick, MA

#787 Jan 11, 2013
Jake wrote:
<quoted text>
Monkeys ass, you worship our YT forefathers that is why you are in this thread trying to claim them cause deep down even you kneegroos know that you have done shit to contribute anything to the modern world. You kneegroos are ghetto infested rats.
You black wretches die each year like drowned rats to reach the advanced civilized countries of the YTs Western countries cause your kneegroo lands are such undeveloped shitholes. You apes haven't evovled from primitive stages. From all the races blacks have the lowest IQs. It's the scientific worlds dirty little secret. Scientists mumble about it underneath their breaths but don't speak openly about cause it isn't the political correct thing to do. You kneegrooos are stupid chimps and one only has to look at shithole your ancestral kneegrooo African lands are to see this. You can look all over the planet and support the claim of Low IQ among knnegrooos with daily examples of black failure, thousands of times over. You can start with a shithole like Haiti and go all the way to the shithole that black Africa has become after YT has left you chimps on your own. And the common denominator is the kneegroo and your inability to constrictively civilize and run advance  modern developed Countries with higher standard of living, that's why wretched blacks drown like rats each year trying to reach advanced civilized countries of the West. And that is why rich YT rock stars need to put together concerts to raise money to feed you black wretches. You kneegroos were undeveloped primitives who lived in mud huts and you STILL are undeveloped primitives who live in mud huts. Any place you go in black Africa you can still find you knnegroos living like you stepped right out of the stoneages. No wonder you try to claim our YT ancestros, thats cause your kneegroo ancestros still are stuck in prehistoric times wearing lion clothes and hunting animals with spears. Pathetic undeveloped kneegrooo.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =SR5LjSW_jXwXX
"The average Kneegrooo IQ is 70". It means that black Africans have an average IQ of 70. Some put it lower at 67.
You stupid racist piece of shit. You know NOTHING about Africans or of Africans accomplishments in this world and even less about African civilizations. Its YOUR European ancestors who invaded, striped of her resources, started wars, and put up puppet governments all over Africa.
Brink DaFallen Reach

Detroit, MI

#788 Jan 11, 2013
TRUTH HITMAN IS BACK wrote:
<quoted text>
Listen this is what you just said pay atention to what you say
Your comment "My father is dark hair" "my both grandmothers blue eyed and blond"
THATS my point you said your father has DARK HAIR not SKIN Those accounts of ancient Swarthy Europeans is NOT talking about HAIR they HAD DARK skin.
Example Greek-speaking Roman historian Priscus and Jordanes said that the HUNS were BLACK SKIN PEOPLE NOT BLACK HAIRED PEOPLE
Quote: Priscus about Atilla
1. Attila’s personal features: a short, square body with a large head; deep-seated eyes; a swarthy complexion with little facial hair. He wore plain, not luxurious, clothing.
Quote: Jordanes about Attila
2. They made their foes flee in horror because their swarthy (black skinned) aspect was fearful, and they had, if I may call it so, a sort of hideous lump, not a head, with pinholes rather than eyes. For they cut the cheeks of the males with a sword.
Thats NOT speaking about your dad and his black hair swarthy just means BLACK skin unlesss specified.
Example JANE AUSTEN this is her discription by Edward Austen Leigh
She was tall and slender; her face was rounded with a clear brunette complexion and bright hazel eyes. Her curly brown hair
Three things specified here it said that Jane had the following:
1. tall and slender
2. her face was rounded with a clear brunette complexion and bright hazel eyes
3. Her curly brown hair
The discription siad she had BROWN HAIR BUT HER SKIN WAS DARK or BROWN
That is not describing a whitewoman and certainly not describing any one in your family. Janes description would make her look something like rihanna
http://www.cupcakestastenice.com/wp-content/u...
Brown skin hazel eyes
another example
PARSONS or PERSONS, ROBERT
(1546-1610), Jesuit missionary and contro-
versialist, was born at Nether Stowey, near
Bridgwater, Somerset, on 24 June 1546. His
father, Henry Parsons, said to have been a
blacksmith, had by his wife Christiana eleven
children, of whom Robert was the sixth.
Dodd in describing his personal appearance, says 'he was of middle size, his complexion rather swarthy, which, with strong features, made his countenance somewhat forbidding.
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Parsons,_Robert... (1546-1610)_(DNB00
Scroll through and read his description "his personal appearance, says 'he was of middle size, his complexion rather swarthy"
so HIS SKIN COLOR was BLACK it said nothing about his hair color did it? NO it did not stop assuming it is talking about his hair trying to aviod the FACT that he may be a NEGRO
Yo brotha Truth you don't have to debate about any Asian Decent for the simple fact of the Pan Alkebulanians and That about around between 5 and 10 years ago a White WOMAN went to China and did genetic research and forced the Chinese to admit that ALL ASIA ROOTS traced back to Alkebulan/Africa. I was stunned to see that on utube let alone here them say it. To be honest I am ashamed of my Asian lineage because they gave up their ways of life to follow the Evil people into nothingness
Brink DaFallen Reach

Detroit, MI

#789 Jan 11, 2013
Jeff wrote:
<quoted text>
You stupid racist piece of shit. You know NOTHING about Africans or of Africans accomplishments in this world and even less about African civilizations. Its YOUR European ancestors who invaded, striped of her resources, started wars, and put up puppet governments all over Africa.
I do apologize Jeff for a couple of Months I thought of you to be similar to Jake but apparently I was misled. I am just going defend to lineage, brothers and truth

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
why is the most popular male porn star white? 3 min I see triplets 151
leave white people alone 4 min Lover 3
What if unarmed white youths were to be shot down 4 min Realist 83
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min shinningelectr0n 1,155,989
the moors were black africans not arabs!!! (Jun '08) 6 min Motts 29,015
FRENCH THREAD in AA Forum? (Oct '09) 8 min Savant 3,930
asian, white, and latina women prefer wm. (Nov '13) 10 min TheOriginalDoby 180
Hebrew Israelite (Feb '11) 42 min Hebrew Warrior 98,808
2 NYPD MURDERED on behalf of Eric GARNER 1 hr guest 612
Black Americans Are TRAPPED in Racist USA. (fro... 1 hr say what 196
More from around the web