child support encourages whorish beha...

child support encourages whorish behavior in women and what to do about it!

Posted in the African-American Forum

Anonymous

Flushing, NY

#1 Jun 10, 2011
After years of observing an untold number of women who have numerous children with different fathers and different last names for each child, I have come to the conclusion that it is beyond time for a radical intervention approach. In the US women (particularly minority women) have children without regard to who is fathering them (or the ultimate psychological damage being done to their children) because they know that welfare and child support to financially provide for them. The damage that welfare has done to destabilize families in the US, by encouraging men to not be in the home has been well documented; however, after years of watching women continue to have multiple children out of wedlock without consideration of the men who they get pregnant by, I feel that child support laws has to be looked at as one of the biggest supporters of this trend.
With the number of out of wedlock births increasing across all races, age groups, and social-economic classes, child support laws as they are currently written & enforced has to be seen as the primary factor that contributes to this trend. In other words child support encourages whorish behavior in women, because it ensures that no matter how recklessly or irresponsibility a woman behaves, she will not have to pay for her actions. The increasing number of out of wedlock births will not be reverse through shame tactics, or religious protests. These numbers will not change through appeal, dialog, or debate. This trend will only reverse by removing the green light for women to act like whores.
Recognizing that modern child support laws encourage whorish behavior in women, changes are needed in the way these laws are enforced. Some father’s rights groups have argued that paternity tests should be mandatory before child support is awarded to the mother. I support that idea, but I will take it a step further. I propose that child support be awarded on a sliding scale, by considering the relationship in which a child was conceived before awarding financial assistance. Specifically I am suggesting that a woman should only be entitled to child support if she can prove that she was abandoned by the father. Furthermore the only way a woman can be given a maximum child support award is if she was married to the father, and he either:(A). Divorced her or (B). Left the home.
Anonymous

Flushing, NY

#2 Jun 10, 2011
For women who have children out of wedlock, consideration will be given on a sliding scale (based on the amount of time that the mother was with the father). In other words a woman that was in a serious relationship with a man (engaged or in a committed monogamous relationship for a significant period of time) will be given a higher amount of child support. The sliding scale will range from anywhere to 10% of the father’s income to 0% if the relationship can be proven to have been a fling where the woman’s recklessness resulted in her being knocked up. This is where the proposal becomes controversial, because the goal is to discourage whorish behavior in women. A woman that gets pregnant from a one night stand, booty call, hook up, etc, should be entitled to “zero” financial support. These women were not abandoned by their man, because they weren’t with him beyond a quick screw. These women were only victims of their own poor choices & whorish behavior.

With the sliding scale child support system, not only should children who came from “Mom getting drunk dat night in da club” not receive any financial support. Also any child who came from a relationship less than a year (before the woman conceives) will not be classified as an abandoned child. Furthermore to discourage women by having multiple children by the same loser, the maximum a woman who has out of wedlock children will ever be eligible for is 10% of a man’s income regardless of the number of children she has by one man. The sliding scale child support system will no doubt be met with outrage and protest by horrified women. It will probably be opposed male apologist. Certainly the sliding scale child support system will be viewed as anti-women and misogynistic. In reality the sliding scale child support system is an attempt to prevent the total collapse of the family in America.

Sincerely,

Anonymous

Level 5

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#3 Jun 10, 2011
Just because a man is ordered to pay child support, DOES NOT mean he will pay it.
oh man

Mosman, Australia

#4 Nov 21, 2013
Anonymous wrote:
After years of observing an untold number of women who have numerous children with different fathers and different last names for each child, I have come to the conclusion that it is beyond time for a radical intervention approach. In the US women (particularly minority women) have children without regard to who is fathering them (or the ultimate psychological damage being done to their children) because they know that welfare and child support to financially provide for them. The damage that welfare has done to destabilize families in the US, by encouraging men to not be in the home has been well documented; however, after years of watching women continue to have multiple children out of wedlock without consideration of the men who they get pregnant by, I feel that child support laws has to be looked at as one of the biggest supporters of this trend.
With the number of out of wedlock births increasing across all races, age groups, and social-economic classes, child support laws as they are currently written & enforced has to be seen as the primary factor that contributes to this trend. In other words child support encourages whorish behavior in women, because it ensures that no matter how recklessly or irresponsibility a woman behaves, she will not have to pay for her actions. The increasing number of out of wedlock births will not be reverse through shame tactics, or religious protests. These numbers will not change through appeal, dialog, or debate. This trend will only reverse by removing the green light for women to act like whores.
Recognizing that modern child support laws encourage whorish behavior in women, changes are needed in the way these laws are enforced. Some father’s rights groups have argued that paternity tests should be mandatory before child support is awarded to the mother. I support that idea, but I will take it a step further. I propose that child support be awarded on a sliding scale, by considering the relationship in which a child was conceived before awarding financial assistance. Specifically I am suggesting that a woman should only be entitled to child support if she can prove that she was abandoned by the father. Furthermore the only way a woman can be given a maximum child support award is if she was married to the father, and he either:(A). Divorced her or (B). Left the home.
You can call upon a law or state or whatever and call it a bad thing. the fact is, laws don't mean anything unless they have willing participants. who are these willing participants? women. Women through their hypergamous nature, have decided that they don't need, nor want men. All I want to know is, how do I get out of the arrangement where my tax dollars are forcibly going to these people against my will?

I'm pretty sure that democracy is the dominant form of government right now, but when you can force the productive class (men) to support the parasitic class (women) by force, something is seriously wrong.

Personally I don't care what they do, as long as I don't have to pay for it.
dbiggs

United States

#5 Nov 22, 2013
Men need to exercise a lot more caution when dealing with hoodrats!
Soul Hunter

United States

#6 Nov 22, 2013
dbiggs"]Men need to exercise a lot more caution when dealing with hoodrats!
No men need too steer clear of them and not bother with them at all!
dbiggs

United States

#7 Nov 23, 2013
Soul Hunter wrote:
dbiggs"]Men need to exercise a lot more caution when dealing with hoodrats!
No men need too steer clear of them and not bother with them at all!
Got me on that one!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min Yeah 1,509,840
This good ol' boy never meant no harm! 27 min Ben 2,115
Short rappers vs tall rappers 36 min Justsaying 3
News Santa Fe officer calls city 'most racist place ... (Jul '16) 1 hr The ACQUITTED Axe 21
Steroids in the food 1 hr Justsaying 3
Black teens - men under unreasonable standards 1 hr The ACQUITTED Axe 5
Black men, tell me how you liked white boy sex ... (Apr '12) 1 hr Taken335 28
Blacks and Tipping 2 hr Charlie 54
White men are the solution for the single black... 2 hr IT IS I 174
I'm a married white women having sex with Black... (Jun '10) 5 hr misfit 0676 205
News Rolly: Black is beautiful, as long as you're a ... 7 hr Spotted Girl 35
Do black men really have larger penises? (Sep '10) 8 hr George Carden 1,441
More from around the web