The Phoenicians (black or white)?
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#554 May 24, 2014
Anonymous wrote:
I'm confused. if ham is the progenitor of the dark races then wouldn't that make the Phoenicians black?
<quoted text>
WHITE Berbers in Morocco and Algeria are INDIGENOUS to North Africa! They are also sons of Ham!
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#555 May 24, 2014
The Truth wrote:
Well Kabina, you asked it so I'm going to answer it. Before I tell you anything you need to know that what I am going to tell you is the truth 100% and I do not lie. The Phoenicians were great seafaring traders who established colonies at Cyprus, North Africa, southern Spain, Balerics, Sardinia, and Sicily. One of their most powerful being Carthage in North Africa. They reached places such as the Azores, Arctic Ocean, and even reached England. The Phoenicians were Black Africans. They were not Arab or European, but pure Black. The word Phoenicia is a Greek word meaning "purple people" because the Phoenicians were known for being the creates of the Tyrian purple which they extracted from murex shell fish.
The Phoenicians ancestral name was Canaan because they were descendents of the Black Canaanites who were African. Read Genesis 10:6 and it says Canaan was one of Hams four sons. When we look up Ham in the Zonsdervans Compact Bible Dictionary it says his name literally means black obviously because he was a Black man.This is because he was the father of all the black African race of people.Now if Ham was black just as his name means we can conclude that his posterity(offspring) would be too. Now when we read Genesis 10:15 it says Canaans firstborn son was Sidon. Sidon was the name of one the Phoenicians chief cities. In the bible the Phoenicians are called Sidonians becausethey are the offspring of Sidon Canaans first son. You should look this up. Sidon was their tribal identit. Now these are most definately black people. These people gave the Greeks their alphabet because the Greeks (white people) did not have one. The Greeks always traded with the Phoenicians as a result they adopted the Phoenician alphabet because the Greeks had no written language. he Greeks(white people) passed this alphabet down to the Romans(white people), this is how the Roman got the Latin language. The first two letters of the Phoenician alphabet are Aleph and Bet. The first two letters of the Greek are Alpha and Beta. Which reminds one of the word Alphabet. This Phoenician alphabet even reached the British Isles which is where the English language derives from.
This might sound really unbelievable to you but it is the straight up truth.
BUMBO low IQ IDIOT modern Lebanese ARE THE DESCENDANTS OF THE PHOENICIANS carrying the SAME DNA!
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#556 May 24, 2014
Jerome wrote:
They were black without a shadow of a doubt.According to the Zondervans Compact Bible Dictionary Ham means black. Its obvious that the meaning of his name refers to his physical appearence. Hams fourth son was Canaan according to Genesis 10:6. Canaans firstborn son was Sidon(Genesis 10:15). Phoenician is a Greek word referring to the famous tyrian purple that the Phoenicians took from murex shell fish. The Phoenicians claimed themselves to be Sidonians(their Canaanite tribal identity). Its also funny how one of the Phoenicians most famous cities held the name Sidon. In Zondervans bible dictionary when we look up Phoenicia it says "the semetic name for the land is Canaan". The Phoenicians were always known as Canaanites to the Hebrews. Thats also funny because the Phoenician alphabet was the Canaanite alphabet. The Phoenicians were Canaanites. All Canaanites are Black. Just like Canaans father Ham (Genesis 10:6). The Phoenicians ancestrally are Hamites(Africans). This was the alphabet that the Greek and Latin languages were based off of. First two letters of Canaanite alphabet is Aleph and Bet. The first two letters of the Greek(derived from Canaanite alphabet) are alpha and beta. Which is how we get the word alphabet.
These are ancient coins from PHOENICIA, THEY LOOK EXACTLY LIKE WHITE MEN:
www.wildwinds.com/coins/greece/phoenicia/tyre...
native American

Silver Spring, MD

#557 May 24, 2014
The Egyptians are undeniably African, you use mordern day Egyptians to the original Egyptians. The pure African bloodlines of the true Egyptians has been corrupted starting in 525 bce (and this is also true for all of North Africa, which at various points in time conquered certain parts of North Africa and corrupted the blood there too). And many of originals fled to other parts of Africa. The original Egyptians/North Africans before Europe was anything was African like any other
Jerome

Chicago, IL

#558 May 24, 2014
African AE wrote:
<quoted text>BUMBO low IQ IDIOT modern Lebanese ARE THE DESCENDANTS OF THE PHOENICIANS carrying the SAME DNA!
First of all, the Phoenicians were Canaanites. All Canaanites are black regardless of anything. Fuck the white Mans DNA bullshit information. If the modern Lebanese aren't black then they ain't got nothing to do with the Phoenicians. Like I said the Phoenicians were Sidonians as their tribal identity of the Canaanites. Sidon is Canaans firstborn read Genesis 10:15 and Canaan was the son of Ham read Genesis 10:6. Ham was strait up black as the bible dictionary indicates what his name means. The Phoenicians were Hamites/Canaanites, there is no such thing as a white hamite sorry if you are the bumbo low IQ idiot if you think there is. There is no such thing as white sons of Ham. The fact that I laughed when you say there is and if you continue to push these false claims I will keep on laughing. Saying there's white sons of Ham is like saying there's black sons of Japhet. Do you mind telling me who the black sons Japhet are? Oh that's right there are none.
Jerome

Chicago, IL

#559 May 24, 2014
African AE wrote:
<quoted text>These are ancient coins from PHOENICIA, THEY LOOK EXACTLY LIKE WHITE MEN:
www.wildwinds.com/coins/greece/phoenicia/tyre...
I looked up Phoenicians on google images search engine and it showed me all black people. Anyway hands down the internet is not a valid source for providing proof. Such as google search or Wikipedia links where anybody can post photos. I can make a Wikipedia on the Phoenicians being black right now as we speak. I want sources such as books and ancient records. For example: the bible. According to the records of the Hebrews(the bible) the Phoenicians descend from the original Canaanites who were pure black.
Jerome

Chicago, IL

#560 May 24, 2014
African AE wrote:
<quoted text>WHITE Berbers in Morocco and Algeria are INDIGENOUS to North Africa! They are also sons of Ham!
LOL white sons of Ham. You do know that Hams first born son Cush were the Ethiopians. Ethiopian comes from Greek word Aithiops which means "burnt face". The Ethiopians were blacker than tar. Ham himself was straight up ink black. How is his descendents going to be white with him being this.
shut down

Katy, TX

#561 May 25, 2014
swarthy means black

“DANGER!!”

Level 8

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#562 Aug 19, 2014
Jerome wrote:
<quoted text>
First of all, the Phoenicians were Canaanites. All Canaanites are black regardless of anything. Fuck the white Mans DNA bullshit information. If the modern Lebanese aren't black then they ain't got nothing to do with the Phoenicians. Like I said the Phoenicians were Sidonians as their tribal identity of the Canaanites. Sidon is Canaans firstborn read Genesis 10:15 and Canaan was the son of Ham read Genesis 10:6. Ham was strait up black as the bible dictionary indicates what his name means. The Phoenicians were Hamites/Canaanites, there is no such thing as a white hamite sorry if you are the bumbo low IQ idiot if you think there is. There is no such thing as white sons of Ham. The fact that I laughed when you say there is and if you continue to push these false claims I will keep on laughing. Saying there's white sons of Ham is like saying there's black sons of Japhet. Do you mind telling me who the black sons Japhet are? Oh that's right there are none.
You and all of your sock puppet iterations are full of shít. That absurd biblical interpretation about the children of Ham or the Canaanites being Black was discredited many many many years ago. It was mostly used by Caucasian racists to justify the subordination of all Blacks, but, strangely enough, it is today still used by foolishly ignorant Black fools like you.

It has no true anthropological basis since Canaanites are and have always been primarily of the male 'J2' Y-Hg Chromosome genetically and, even more importantly, there is not and never has been any female 'L' mtDNA Chromosomes amongst any of them.

Your only possible defense would be for you to somehow prove that modern anthropology's use of state of the art molecular biological studies have no proper scientific basis.

Good luck with using your Ham-fisted hack-kneed cacophony of deus ex machina, poor writing, filler and cliches in some absurd bid to dislodge the immutable footing of modern scientific genetic findings, fool.

“DANGER!!”

Level 8

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#563 Aug 19, 2014
shut down wrote:
swarthy means black
If you are going to insist upon using its root meaning then you must also accept that the term, "Black", at the time that that word's usage came into being, was used in reference to Caucasians with DARK HAIR and/or a even just a TAN complexion, but never actual BLACK SKINNED Peoples.

Even today, the usage of that word has not strayed from its original intent, fool.

“DANGER!!”

Level 8

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#564 Aug 19, 2014
shut down wrote:
swarthy means black
Germans would have used the word, "Nëgër", and/or "Nëgerartiger", back then, when Anglo/Saxons first coined the word, "Swarthy"(which doesn't at all have the same intent) and they still do, in order to make reference to anyone of a BLACK SKINNED complexion.

"Swarthy" was an Anglo/Saxon derivation of the German word, "Schwarz", but not meant for reference to any Négroïd Peoples.
African AE

Durban, South Africa

#565 Aug 19, 2014
Raptor X wrote:
I have done a lot of study of the phoenicians arguing with people trying to tell me that the moors were black. The symbol of the phoenix bird used by the egyptians, came from the phoenicians. It is the phoenicians that carry the earliest history of the moors, not the blacks. They had the best ships, and the largest trade market of their time, from asia to europe. What they looked like has not yet been determined except that they were a light brown people, and are considered to be of the arab bloodline at the beginning. They bought many white slaves and bred with them, and light skin dominated over time to change the look of the people. Much of the Roman technology was actually imported technology for the phoenicians. They were far ahead of their time.
They were WHITE looking NO DIFFERENT to Greeks
www.lessingimages.com/viewimage.asp...
www.superstock.com/stock-photos-images/1566-9...
www.metmuseum.org/toah/works-of-art/74.51.245...
African AE

Durban, South Africa

#566 Aug 19, 2014
Jerome wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL white sons of Ham. You do know that Hams first born son Cush were the Ethiopians. Ethiopian comes from Greek word Aithiops which means "burnt face". The Ethiopians were blacker than tar. Ham himself was straight up ink black. How is his descendents going to be white with him being this.
Nowhere in the BIBLE does it state the colour of Ham! Hamites are also WHITE! Cushites are BLACK!

ANCIENT PHOENICIANS looking JUST like GREEKS:
www.lessingimages.com/viewimage.asp...
www.superstock.com/stock-photos-images/1566-9...

WHITE HAMITE LIBYANS PAINTED ON EGYPTIAN WALLS:
www.takenote.it/blog/...
ANCIENT WHITE HAMITE EGYPTIANS:
White man builds SPHINX:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ankhhaf
Ancient WHITE HAMITE EGYPTIANS of the 5thDynasty:
www.atlanteangardens.blogspot.com/2014/03/fac...

ANCIENT EGYPTIANS LOOKED EXACTLY LIKE MODERN EGYPTIANS! BOTH WERE INDIGENOUS NORTH AFRICANS!
HAMITES = NORTH AFRICANS;
www.dienekes.blogspot.com/2005/12/ancient-egy...
African AE

Durban, South Africa

#567 Aug 19, 2014
Jerome wrote:
<quoted text>
First of all, the Phoenicians were Canaanites. All Canaanites are black regardless of anything. Fuck the white Mans DNA bullshit information. If the modern Lebanese aren't black then they ain't got nothing to do with the Phoenicians. Like I said the Phoenicians were Sidonians as their tribal identity of the Canaanites. Sidon is Canaans firstborn read Genesis 10:15 and Canaan was the son of Ham read Genesis 10:6. Ham was strait up black as the bible dictionary indicates what his name means. The Phoenicians were Hamites/Canaanites, there is no such thing as a white hamite sorry if you are the bumbo low IQ idiot if you think there is. There is no such thing as white sons of Ham. The fact that I laughed when you say there is and if you continue to push these false claims I will keep on laughing. Saying there's white sons of Ham is like saying there's black sons of Japhet. Do you mind telling me who the black sons Japhet are? Oh that's right there are none.
Canaanites were WHITE INDIGENOUS EURASIANS and their DESCENDANTS the PHOENICIANS looked EXACTLY LIKE THEM!
Ancient Berbers where WHITE ORIGINATING from the Middle East long before the pyramids!
MORE WHITE NORTH AFRICAN INDIGENOUS HAMITES:
www.youtube.com/watch...
Both Egyptians and Moroccans CARRY OVERWHELMINGLY INDIGENOUS NORTH AFRICAN DNA and NOT European or Middle Eastern DNA! They are HAMITES whether you like it or not!!!!!!!!!!
Truth Hurts

Saint Paul, MN

#568 Aug 28, 2014
Curious Me wrote:
<quoted text>
You and all of your sock puppet iterations are full of shít. That absurd biblical interpretation about the children of Ham or the Canaanites being Black was discredited many many many years ago. It was mostly used by Caucasian racists to justify the subordination of all Blacks, but, strangely enough, it is today still used by foolishly ignorant Black fools like you.
It has no true anthropological basis since Canaanites are and have always been primarily of the male 'J2' Y-Hg Chromosome genetically and, even more importantly, there is not and never has been any female 'L' mtDNA Chromosomes amongst any of them.
Your only possible defense would be for you to somehow prove that modern anthropology's use of state of the art molecular biological studies have no proper scientific basis.
Good luck with using your Ham-fisted hack-kneed cacophony of deus ex machina, poor writing, filler and cliches in some absurd bid to dislodge the immutable footing of modern scientific genetic findings, fool.
First of all it is obvious you have no idea about the biblical ethnicities and genealogies of the Bible. If you did you would know that Ham was the father of the Black African race of people. Ham himself was Black according to the Bible. Hams firstborn sons name was Cush (Genesis 10:6). Cush in is the Hebrew word for Ethiopia. The Hebrews always referred to Ethiopia as Cush because Cush was the father of the Ethiopian people. Ethiopia comes from the Greek word "aithiops" which means "burnt face" because the Ethiopians were Black in complexion. Now since Cush's descendents had this type of physical apearence we can conclude that Cush was none other than a Black man. Cush was the son of Ham (Genesis 10:6). In order for Ham to have a Black son Ham had to be Black. That goes for Mizraim, Phut, and Canaan who were the sons of Ham. If Cush was Black then his three younger brothers Mizraim, Phut, and Canaan were also Black. That is a logical conclusion since all four were blood brorhers.

The Phoenicians come from Hams son Canaan. This is why Ancient Phoenicia was located in "The Land of Canaan". The Phoenicians NEVER called themselves Phoenicians. Phoenicia is a Greek word meaning "purple people" because the Phoenicians were the famous creaters of the Tyrian purple. The Phoenicians called themselves Sidonians. This was because they come from Canaans son Sidon (Genesis 10:15).

Ancient map of the Land of Canaan:
http://www.google.com/imgres...

On the North-West part of the map it says "Sidonians (Phoenicians)" because the Phoenicians were Sidonians. Thats their Canaanite tribal identity. The Phoenicians come from the Sidonian tribe of Canaanites.

Do these Phoenician coins look white to you:
http://www.beazley.ox.ac.uk/gems/scarab/scara...

Those coins depict Black Africans.
Truth Hurts

Saint Paul, MN

#569 Aug 28, 2014
African AE wrote:
<quoted text>Nowhere in the BIBLE does it state the colour of Ham! Hamites are also WHITE! Cushites are BLACK!
ANCIENT PHOENICIANS looking JUST like GREEKS:
www.lessingimages.com/viewimage.asp...
www.superstock.com/stock-photos-images/1566-9...
WHITE HAMITE LIBYANS PAINTED ON EGYPTIAN WALLS:
www.takenote.it/blog/...
ANCIENT WHITE HAMITE EGYPTIANS:
White man builds SPHINX:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ankhhaf
Ancient WHITE HAMITE EGYPTIANS of the 5thDynasty:
www.atlanteangardens.blogspot.com/2014/03/fac...
ANCIENT EGYPTIANS LOOKED EXACTLY LIKE MODERN EGYPTIANS! BOTH WERE INDIGENOUS NORTH AFRICANS!
HAMITES = NORTH AFRICANS;
www.dienekes.blogspot.com/2005/12/ancient-egy...
As usual you make no sense. The Cushites were Hamites idiot. Cush was the firstborn son of Ham (Genesis 10:6). Hamite refers to anyone who descends from Ham. Ethiopians descend from Ham so they are Hamites. Cush is the Hebrew word for Ethiopia. The Hebrews always referred to Ethiopia as Cush because Cush was the father of the Ethiopian people. Ethiopia comes from the Greek word "aithiops" which means "burnt face" because the Ethiopians were Black in complexity. Since Cush's descendents looked this way in appearence then we can conclude that Cush wasaBlack man. Dont forget Cush was the son of Ham. It would only be logical to conclude that Ham was a Black man since his firstborn son was Black. Thats only common sense. Now if Ham was a Black man then all of his sons would have been Black. That includes Mizraim, Phut, and Canaan.

The Phoenicians come from Hams son Canaan. This is why Ancient Phoenicia was located in "The Land of Canaan". The Phoenicians NEVER called themselves Phoenicians. Phoenicia is a Greek word meaning "purple people" because the Phoenicians were the famous creaters of the Tyrian purple. The Phoenicians called themselves Sidonians. This was because they come from Canaans son Sidon (Genesis 10:15).

Ancient map of the Land of Canaan:
http://www.google.com/imgres...

On the North-West part of the map it says "Sidonians (Phoenicians)" because the Phoenicians were Sidonians. Thats their Canaanite tribal identity. The Phoenicians come from the Sidonian tribe of Canaanites.

Do these Ancient Phoenician coins look white:
http://www.beazley.ox.ac.uk/gems/scarab/scara...

They depict Black African men.
Truth Hurts

Saint Paul, MN

#570 Aug 28, 2014
African AE wrote:
<quoted text>Nowhere in the BIBLE does it state the colour of Ham! Hamites are also WHITE! Cushites are BLACK!
ANCIENT PHOENICIANS looking JUST like GREEKS:
www.lessingimages.com/viewimage.asp...
www.superstock.com/stock-photos-images/1566-9...
WHITE HAMITE LIBYANS PAINTED ON EGYPTIAN WALLS:
www.takenote.it/blog/...
ANCIENT WHITE HAMITE EGYPTIANS:
White man builds SPHINX:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ankhhaf
Ancient WHITE HAMITE EGYPTIANS of the 5thDynasty:
www.atlanteangardens.blogspot.com/2014/03/fac...
ANCIENT EGYPTIANS LOOKED EXACTLY LIKE MODERN EGYPTIANS! BOTH WERE INDIGENOUS NORTH AFRICANS!
HAMITES = NORTH AFRICANS;
www.dienekes.blogspot.com/2005/12/ancient-egy...
Hams second son was Mizraim (Genesis 10:6). Mizraim in Ancient Hebrew means "Upper and Lower Egypt". The Hebrews always referred to Egypt as Mizraim because he was the father of the Egyptian people.

Egypt is also called "The Land of Ham" in the Bible.
(Psalms 105:23, 27 and Psalms 106:22). This is obviously referring to the fact that the Egyptians were Hamites. This title can only apply to a Black nation of people. Egypt was also called "The Tabernacles of Ham" according to the Bible (Psalms 78:51).

Herodotus The Greek Historian said:
"The Egyptians have Black skin and Woolly hair"
Read "History of Herodotus" Book II Euterpe
Translated by George Rawlinson, PG. 289

Here's the link to the online book:
http://www.google.com/url...
(Just go to page 289)

Aristotle The Greek Philosopher said:
"Those who are Black are cowards, the Ethiopians and Egyptians for instance"

Now Herodotus and Aristotle both lived in the times when Egyptian civilization was in existence. They would have known what an Egyptian looked like.

Hamites = Black Africans

And by the way I thought you embarassed yourself enough with you blue eyed Egyptians link. Your pathetic. I bet your next response is going to be Aristotle never went to Egypt. Are you accusing Aristotle of lying? LOL, gone right ahead and make yourself look even more parhetic. You might respond with Herodotus said "dark skinned" not "Black" even though I gave you the online book to see where he clearly uses the word Black. How much more will you embarass yourself.
Truth Hurts

Saint Paul, MN

#571 Aug 28, 2014
African AE wrote:
<quoted text>Canaanites were WHITE INDIGENOUS EURASIANS and their DESCENDANTS the PHOENICIANS looked EXACTLY LIKE THEM!
Ancient Berbers where WHITE ORIGINATING from the Middle East long before the pyramids!
MORE WHITE NORTH AFRICAN INDIGENOUS HAMITES:
www.youtube.com/watch...
Both Egyptians and Moroccans CARRY OVERWHELMINGLY INDIGENOUS NORTH AFRICAN DNA and NOT European or Middle Eastern DNA! They are HAMITES whether you like it or not!!!!!!!!!!
ALL OF THE HAMITES WERE BLACK AFRICANS!

A Hamite is anyone who descends from Ham. Thats where the term Hamite comes from. Ham and all of his descendents were Black.

Hams firstborn son was Cush (Genesis 10:6). Cush is the Hebrew word for Ethiopia. The Hebrews always referred to Cush as Ethiopia because Cush was the father of the Ethiopian people. Ethiopia comes from the Greek word "aithiops" which means "burnt face" because the Ethiopians were Black in complexity. The Cushites were Black.

Hams second son was Mizraim (Genesis 10:6). Mizraim in Ancient Hebrew means "Upper and Lower Egypt". The Hebrews always referred to Mizraim as Egypt because Mizraim was the father of the Egyptian people. Egypt was called "The Land of Ham" according to the Bible. Obviously making reference to the fact that the Egyptians were Hamites. This title can only apply to a Black nation of people. Egypt was also called "The Tabernacles of Ham" according to the Bible.

Herodotus The Greek Historian said:
"The Egyptians have Black skin and Woolly hair"
Read "History of Herodotus" Book II Euterpe
Translated by George Rawlinson, PG. 289

Here's the link to the online book:
http://www.google.com/url...
(Just go to page 289)

Aristotle The Greek Philosopher said:
"Those who are Black are cowards, the Ethiopians and Egyptians for instance"

The third son of Ham was Phut (Genesis 10:6). Libya is an ancient Greek word meaning "Land of Northern Africa West of Egypt". According to the Jewish historian Flavius Josephus Phut was the Hebrew word for Libya. Josephus also concluded that Phut was the father of the Libyan people.

Read "The Life and Works of Flavius Josephus" Translated by William Whiston.

The Berbers were the direct descendents of the Libyans. It would be only logical to conclude that Berbers and Libyans are of the same origin. Berbers were Hamites.

Did not the Berbers invade Spain under the name of Moors?

Procopius of Caesarea (500-565 AD), a Byzantine scholar who wrote in Greek, said in his "History of the Wars":
"beyond that there are men not black-skinned like the Moors"

Here is a brief description of the conquering Moors described by a writer who sympathized with Christian Spain:
"....the reins of their horses were as fire, their faces black as pitch, their eyes shone like burning candles, their horses were swift as leopards and the riders fiercer than a wolf in the sheepfold at night;... the noble Goths were broken in an hour, quicker than tongue can tell. Oh, luckless Spain!"
You can read this in "Story of Nations" by L. B. Rogers, Fay Adams [and] Walker Brown.

Stop trying to steal history that doesn't belong to you.

“No Substitute For The Truth”

Level 8

Since: Jan 10

Orlando, FL

#572 Aug 28, 2014
After doing research on The Phoenician alphabet, it is very close to the origins of the alphabet in Egypt. I think The Phoenician were Semites but non-Arabic Semites if this make sense. There doesn't seem to be a distinction between Pre & Post Arabic Semites. The Phoenicians most likely resembled Pre-Arabic Semites.
African AE

Durban, South Africa

#573 Aug 28, 2014
Truth Hurts wrote:
<quoted text>
First of all it is obvious you have no idea about the biblical ethnicities and genealogies of the Bible. If you did you would know that Ham was the father of the Black African race of people. Ham himself was Black according to the Bible. Hams firstborn sons name was Cush (Genesis 10:6). Cush in is the Hebrew word for Ethiopia. The Hebrews always referred to Ethiopia as Cush because Cush was the father of the Ethiopian people. Ethiopia comes from the Greek word "aithiops" which means "burnt face" because the Ethiopians were Black in complexion. Now since Cush's descendents had this type of physical apearence we can conclude that Cush was none other than a Black man. Cush was the son of Ham (Genesis 10:6). In order for Ham to have a Black son Ham had to be Black. That goes for Mizraim, Phut, and Canaan who were the sons of Ham. If Cush was Black then his three younger brothers Mizraim, Phut, and Canaan were also Black. That is a logical conclusion since all four were blood brorhers.
The Phoenicians come from Hams son Canaan. This is why Ancient Phoenicia was located in "The Land of Canaan". The Phoenicians NEVER called themselves Phoenicians. Phoenicia is a Greek word meaning "purple people" because the Phoenicians were the famous creaters of the Tyrian purple. The Phoenicians called themselves Sidonians. This was because they come from Canaans son Sidon (Genesis 10:15).
Ancient map of the Land of Canaan:
http://www.google.com/imgres...
On the North-West part of the map it says "Sidonians (Phoenicians)" because the Phoenicians were Sidonians. Thats their Canaanite tribal identity. The Phoenicians come from the Sidonian tribe of Canaanites.
Do these Phoenician coins look white to you:
http://www.beazley.ox.ac.uk/gems/scarab/scara...
Those coins depict Black Africans.
DO THESE PHOENICIANS LOOK BLACK TO YOU:
www.lessingimage.as p?i=08020466+&cr=85&cl =1
DO THESE CANAANITES LOOK BLACK TO YOU:
www.youtube.com/watch...
www.livescience.com/44719-sculpted-coffin-isr...
ANCIENT MIDDLE EASTERN PEOPLE LOOKED EXACTLY LIKE MODERN MIDDLE EASTERN PEOPLE CARRYING EXACTLY THE SAME DNA!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
are white men inferior or not enough for their ... 6 min Nutz like TicTacs 44
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 17 min Cheech the Conser... 1,643,504
I feel like I can't be with a white guy if he's... 32 min Deanna 56
Banged a tranny in Bangkok - is it homosexual ? 52 min LMRu 9
Black Hooker=Racist White Male's Best Friend 58 min LMRu 9
more white men should become cuckold (Jul '14) 1 hr Nutz like TicTacs 271
Do black men really have larger penises? (Sep '10) 1 hr Original 1,594
Everyday I thank the Lord I am Black!! 2 hr Harrisson 367
Why do black girls get with white guys? 2 hr KIP 113
More from around the web