Boondeeboojoe

Eskilstuna, Sweden

#44 Oct 1, 2013
Ish Tov wrote:
<quoted text>
You can find wrong guesse for everything. But what does the evidence show? What do most scholars come to believe based on that evidence? If there is much evidence, then some conclusions are possible.
You are talking like a typical lying charlatan lay pseudo-academic cult pop “scholar”, not a real academic.
The oldest boat. That is interesting. I already know about that. It does not mean there was civilization. People have had boats without civilization, surely you know.
Western Europeans 6000 years ago were sailing in the Atlantic but I don't hear people calling their Megalithic culture a civilization.
Point is there are discoveries yet to be made that your lot believe africans are not capable of. When they do make those discoveries, far fetched theorize of their origin will pop up. Like non Africans being behind them.

Alot of main stream scholars believe African/blacks are incapable of abstract thinking. If boat building is abstract what is.

Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#45 Oct 1, 2013
Boondeeboojoe wrote:
<quoted text>
Point is there are discoveries yet to be made that your lot believe africans are not capable of. When they do make those discoveries, far fetched theorize of their origin will pop up. Like non Africans being behind them.
Alot of main stream scholars believe African/blacks are incapable of abstract thinking. If boat building is abstract what is.
Listen carefully, boy. I am no racist. You obviously are.“My lot”? You're afflicted with a big mouth and small brain.

Boat building, lol... You moron, humans were capable of abstract thinking long before that. The Upper Palaeolithic after all originated at least by 80,000 years ago according to evidence from southern Africa.

You know NOTHING about anthropology or history, so why don't you keep your ignorant racist mouth shut?

Boy.

Level 4

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#46 Oct 1, 2013
We havent even been here for 20,000 years. The carbon dating of the white establishment is utter and blatant lies. Same as the Neanderthal hoax and evolution in general. Just as the Bible prophecied, the son of destruction would consider himself superior and he would change the times and the laws to suit his global agenda. Jesus referred to this time as the "great deception in the timd of the end" where the entire world would be deceived.

Men didnt need to evolve. Whites, being the latest kid on the block being direct proof of this, their form and genetics being inferior to everyone elses. This means we have fallen over time, Adam being perfect and blacks exhibiting many of the superior/dominant traits that we once had as a perfect creation. Human societies were not primitive. They are now.

Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#47 Oct 1, 2013
Triceroy wrote:
We havent even been here for 20,000 years. The carbon dating of the white establishment is utter and blatant lies. Same as the Neanderthal hoax and evolution in general. Just as the Bible prophecied, the son of destruction would consider himself superior and he would change the times and the laws to suit his global agenda. Jesus referred to this time as the "great deception in the timd of the end" where the entire world would be deceived.
Men didnt need to evolve. Whites, being the latest kid on the block being direct proof of this, their form and genetics being inferior to everyone elses. This means we have fallen over time, Adam being perfect and blacks exhibiting many of the superior/dominant traits that we once had as a perfect creation. Human societies were not primitive. They are now.
“White establishment”? LOL... all science is white and therefore wrong? You're seriously deluded, boy.

Humans evolved, and continue to do so. Evolution is needed for survival, to adapt to changing conditions. Of course you know nothing about that, you're so full of quasi-religious falderol.

Your idiotic supremacist racism is unacceptable and immoral. Change your ways, boy.

Level 4

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#48 Oct 1, 2013
Get the $%#& out of here you godless meat sack. Bootleg Mexican Jew wannabe, wholey trusting in the EVIL white, scientific establishment. And NO, not all acience is white bootleg, I didnt say that. Don't be a loser and respect a valid opinion. All proof and logic is on my side, while you have been thoroughly deceived by the palid one.

God made us perfect and we have fallen in life span and physical ability since then. STILL, blacks being more direct in descent of Adam exhibit superior health and intellect under normal conditions. We dunk all over the white boy, run past him with ease, shake him so hard his ankles break as we pass him and score. Indeed, one of us against 4 or 5 of his, just as I dwarf your mind and expose his lies even now. Weak limbed f@gs seek to stimey and undercut us @ every avenue, with the help of good for nothing meat heads like yourself and this only being for a short time.

No, the earliest civs were not primitive and neither were men, devil. You claiming men had to evolve, become better means you think whites and even yourself is superior to us, which may be why you call everyone boy. Quiet your mouth simpleton.
Boondeeboojoe

Eskilstuna, Sweden

#49 Oct 1, 2013
Ish Tov wrote:
<quoted text>
Listen carefully, boy. I am no racist. You obviously are.“My lot”? You're afflicted with a big mouth and small brain.
Boat building, lol... You moron, humans were capable of abstract thinking long before that. The Upper Palaeolithic after all originated at least by 80,000 years ago according to evidence from southern Africa.
You know NOTHING about anthropology or history, so why don't you keep your ignorant racist mouth shut?
Boy.
Do you ever engage in a discussion without insulting people and threatening them with virtual violence using virtual machete? LOL!

“100%”

Level 8

Since: Jan 10

United States

#50 Oct 1, 2013
Ish Tov wrote:
<quoted text>
You're confused. Still.
Evolution is a confirmed hypothesis. There is a mountain of evidence confirming it. It is a theory, an explanatory framework for natural phenomenon, but that doesn't mean it isn't proven. You do not understand the meaning of “theory”. Theory of gravity. Yet do you doubt gravity? Cell theory. Do you doubt that nearly all life is constructed as cells?
Where civilization first appeared is simply a fact based on evidence, always with the qualifer,“according to the evidence we have available currently”. And there is no assumption that civilization arose in one place and diffused around the world for there. If it was first in SE Europe, that doesn't mean that Egyptian civilization was dependent on that of SE Europe. The evidence indicates that multiple civilizations in Africa as well as America, SE Asia, India, Mideast, Europe, etc., arose and not because of the influence of other civilizations. Not the early ones.
Get over your Afronazi cult indoctrination and think rationally.
Societies prior to the 1700 or 1800s did NOT believe in such theories, they are all recent. Of course ur going to believe the MOST recent theories because in ur mind you believe we are MORE educated or advance now & Humans many years ago were IGNORANT. This is what Evolution teaches & this is how modern scientists give themselves MORE credibility.

“100%”

Level 8

Since: Jan 10

United States

#51 Oct 1, 2013
Ish Tov wrote:
<quoted text>
And you have no explanation for any of it based on any evidence.
And so you continue to fart in the wind.
Continue to believe what you want BUT don't come here passing ur beliefs off as facts. A hypothesis or theory is NOT & will NEVER be a fact.
Chuck

United States

#52 Oct 1, 2013
Redefined wrote:
<quoted text>
Good Stuff! The dates of Ancient Civilizations has been pushed back so much. Scientists have only scraped the surface when it comes Ancient Civilizations.
Agreed
Chuck

United States

#53 Oct 1, 2013
If the 200,000 yr old date of this civilization is indeed accurate, then that would mean that the human species is older and was much more advanced than speculated.

Level 3

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#54 Oct 1, 2013
White people only existed 6,000 years ago. That disqualified from this Ancient Civilization.

http://galsatia.files.wordpress.com/2007/04/b...

This is why they want to blame aliens.
Albert B

Romford, UK

#55 Oct 1, 2013
That isht ov fella seems mad.

Is he or she a red faced racist?

Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#56 Oct 1, 2013
Triceroy wrote:
Get the $%#& out of here you godless meat sack. Bootleg Mexican Jew wannabe, wholey trusting in the EVIL white, scientific establishment. And NO, not all acience is white bootleg, I didnt say that. Don't be a loser and respect a valid opinion. All proof and logic is on my side, while you have been thoroughly deceived by the palid one.
God made us perfect and we have fallen in life span and physical ability since then. STILL, blacks being more direct in descent of Adam exhibit superior health and intellect under normal conditions. We dunk all over the white boy, run past him with ease, shake him so hard his ankles break as we pass him and score. Indeed, one of us against 4 or 5 of his, just as I dwarf your mind and expose his lies even now. Weak limbed f@gs seek to stimey and undercut us @ every avenue, with the help of good for nothing meat heads like yourself and this only being for a short time.
No, the earliest civs were not primitive and neither were men, devil. You claiming men had to evolve, become better means you think whites and even yourself is superior to us, which may be why you call everyone boy. Quiet your mouth simpleton.
You're a racist, boy. That makes you subhuman filth, unworthy of life. You need to go back and slap whichever lowlife scum raised you to be a racist misfit.

Blacks are not “more direct in descent”, that is BS. Since all humans descend from the same common ancestors, all humans are equally “direct”. You are truly stupid, boy. You are worthless in human terms.

You will shut your mouth, boy. And you are a BOY, boy, because as a racist coward you are incapable of being a man. Since no man raised you... you have no clue. And obviously whoever did raise you was filth.

You try shutting me up, boy. Try it.

You're a racist, boy, and therefore lower than rotting garbage.

Boy.

Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#57 Oct 1, 2013
Melody88 wrote:
White people only existed 6,000 years ago. That disqualified from this Ancient Civilization.
http://galsatia.files.wordpress.com/2007/04/b...
This is why they want to blame aliens.
That is false, and your racism makes you subhuman. You are worthless filth.

“White” people existed long before 6000 years ago. There are multiple genes responsible for lightening skin, not just the one you're speaking of, as if you understand ANYTHING about genetics or anthropology, which you do not (you sociopathic scum).

There is no proof of the dating of those stoneworks. The starts are not a reliable method. REAL scientists are required to study this, not marginal cultists.

Now go back and slap whichever lowlife scum raisedy you to be a racist subhuman. Slap that ape good.

Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#58 Oct 1, 2013
Albert B wrote:
That isht ov fella seems mad.
Is he or she a red faced racist?
I am anti-racist, you imbecile.

Against whom would I be racist?

And you, halfwit, you say nothing about all the antisemitism and Afronazism in here?

Clearly you are a hypocrite with low IQ.

Boy.

Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#59 Oct 1, 2013
Chuck wrote:
If the 200,000 yr old date of this civilization is indeed accurate, then that would mean that the human species is older and was much more advanced than speculated.
There is no reliable dating of this site.

To think for one moment you can accept a 200,000 yr date for any civilization only demonstrates how little you know of archaeology.

Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#60 Oct 1, 2013
Redefined wrote:
<quoted text>
Continue to believe what you want BUT don't come here passing ur beliefs off as facts. A hypothesis or theory is NOT & will NEVER be a fact.
You're babbling (again), boy.

Which hypothesis? Which theory?

You do not know what “theory” means, obviously.

I state only scientific facts.

Unlike you, Afronazi cultboy.
Toomis

Houston, TX

#61 Oct 1, 2013
I'm surprised that none of you clowns had run across this years ago.

“i don't shout and don't hate”

Level 4

Since: Mar 09

nairobi

#62 Oct 2, 2013
Ish Tov wrote:
<quoted text>
You're babbling (again), boy.
Which hypothesis? Which theory?
You do not know what “theory” means, obviously.
I state only scientific facts.
Unlike you, Afronazi cultboy.
Barros or WTFever you call yourself,you tell on yourself the way you're always up in these types of threads with your derailing and professional spamming.
This tells us 2 things:
Obviously,you have an agenda.
Likely,you're paid,the time you spend in here.
Someone once told me the USG has active COINTELPRO agents on all black sites and forums-you prove that's no urban myth.

Level 3

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#63 Oct 2, 2013
Ish Tov wrote:
<quoted text>
That is false, and your racism makes you subhuman. You are worthless filth.
“White” people existed long before 6000 years ago. There are multiple genes responsible for lightening skin, not just the one you're speaking of, as if you understand ANYTHING about genetics or anthropology, which you do not (you sociopathic scum).
There is no proof of the dating of those stoneworks. The starts are not a reliable method. REAL scientists are required to study this, not marginal cultists.
Now go back and slap whichever lowlife scum raisedy you to be a racist subhuman. Slap that ape good.
This is a scientific article written by your very own white people, yet this is false? How am I racist, when its clearly states that the white skin was a recent mutation? You are the one who is in denial here, not me.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min Injudgement 1,174,528
All women prefer white men 3 min Mick_ 13
Who Has The BIGGEST Obsession With BM? 6 min Jax 12
Sows/Mammies: I have a question for you… 7 min TheOriginalDoby 2
Will the Brit Royal Family Admit Its Black Heri... (Jul '12) 9 min black troll 29
Hebrew Israelite (Feb '11) 9 min Carly HI YAH 104,980
Sows: I have a question for you… 10 min TheOriginalDoby 2
I need proof that the Ancient Egyptians Were No... (Oct '07) 10 min zico zimp 28,688
Per Capita Blacks commit 440% more crime thanWh... (May '12) 19 min TheOriginalDoby 681
Are black people natural savages? (Nov '11) 58 min IamCuriousNow 167
How has Africa from the begining of time influe... (May '13) 2 hr Don Barros Serrano 3,492
More from around the web