The Ancient Egyptians were black! Fin...
African AE

Johannesburg, South Africa

#1852 Jun 28, 2013
Skull analysis of ancient Hebrews,Jews, Israelites show they were Caucasian and related to todays Sephardi,North African and indigenous Middle Eastern Jews. Natufians were said to be Mechtoids and were interbred out by the Eurasian Neolithic farmers who looked exactly like modern Europeans!
Almoravid

Rotterdam, Netherlands

#1855 Jun 28, 2013
African AE wrote:
Skull analysis of ancient Hebrews,Jews, Israelites show they were Caucasian and related to todays Sephardi,North African and indigenous Middle Eastern Jews. Natufians were said to be Mechtoids and were interbred out by the Eurasian Neolithic farmers who looked exactly like modern Europeans!
LOL at this clown! You are debunking yourself once more. Good job!

REPEAT!

Quote:

quote:
The extremely large skeletal samples that come from sites such as Taforalt (Fig. 8.13) and Afalou constitute an invaluable resource for understanding the makers of Iberomaurusian artifacts, and their number is unparalleled elsewhere in Africa for the early Holocene. Frequently termed Mechta-Afalou or Mechtoid, these were a skeletally robust people and definitely African in origin
--Lawrence Barham

Figure 6. Principal components analysis of craniofacial dimensions among Late Pleistocene to mid-Holocene populations from the Maghreb and southern Sahara.

http://www.plosone.org/article/fetchObject.ac...

Craniometric data from seven human groups (Tables 3, 4) were subjected to principal components analysis, which allies the early Holocene population at Gobero (Gob-e) with mid-Holocene “Mechtoids” from Mali and Mauritania [18],[26],[27] and with Late Pleistocene Iberomaurusians and early Holocene Capsians from across the Maghreb

http://www.plosone.org/article/fetchObject.ac...

Table 3. Nine human populations sampled for craniometric analysis ranging in age from the Late Pleistocene (ca. 80,000 BP, Aterian) to the mid-Holocene (ca. 4000 BP) and in geographic distribution across the Maghreb to the southern Sahara [18],[19],[26],[27],[54].
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.00029 95.t003

http://www.plosone.org/article/fetchObject.ac...

--Lakeside Cemeteries in the Sahara: 5000 Years of Holocene Population and Environmental Change

Quote:
"The European early modern humans at least 28,000 years old exhibit parietal expansion, clear parietal bosses, absence of nuchal tori with variable development of an external occipital protuberance, large and laterally bulbous mastoid processes, superiorly positioned and horizontal temporal zygomatic processes, reduced nasal breadths, some facial shortening, angled zygomatic bones with clear canine fossae, a projecting tuber symphyseos, reduced upper limb muscularity, and formation of a femoral pilaster (Szombathy 1925; Rainer & Simionescu 1942; Vallois 1958; Nicolaescu-Plopsor 1968; Frayer 1986; Garralda et al. 1992; Trinkaus et al. 2003a,b, 2005a,b; E. Trinkaus, personal observations). Although most of these crania (N = 6) lack a supraorbital torus, one is present on Cioclovina 1. In addition, the preserved nasal apertures appear tropical in their lack of a clear angulation of the inferior sill (Franciscus 2003, Trinkaus et al. 2003a), and biomechanical scaling of the Mladec limb remains indicates linear bodies (Trinkaus et al. 2005b); both features support substantial and relatively recent tropical (probably African) ancestry.
--Erik Trinkaus. Annual Review of Anthropology. Palo Alto: 2005. Vol. 34 pg. 207, 24 pgs
African AE

Johannesburg, South Africa

#1858 Jun 28, 2013
Cro-Magnons are the direct ancestors of Caucasians and look exactly like modern Europeans according to Wiki and Mathildas blog! Mechtoids are a mix of Cro-Magnons,neanderthals and North Africans. Neolithic farmers LOOKED EXACTLY like modern Europeans after all they are modern Europeans ancestors and NO NONE OF THEM WERE BLACK JUST LIKE THE EGYPTIANS WHO WERE NEVER BLACK, according to the world and Egyptians themselves! There is a huge difference between a real black Africans skull and a Caucasian skull. Look it up!
Almoravid

Rotterdam, Netherlands

#1859 Jun 28, 2013
African AE wrote:
Cro-Magnons are the direct ancestors of Caucasians and look exactly like modern Europeans according to Wiki and Mathildas blog! Mechtoids are a mix of Cro-Magnons,neanderthals and North Africans. Neolithic farmers LOOKED EXACTLY like modern Europeans after all they are modern Europeans ancestors and NO NONE OF THEM WERE BLACK JUST LIKE THE EGYPTIANS WHO WERE NEVER BLACK, according to the world and Egyptians themselves! There is a huge difference between a real black Africans skull and a Caucasian skull. Look it up!
You're right, according to Wiki and Mathildas blog!LOL

SMH

I've posted numerous studies, stating different. SMH

Ancient Egytians themselves stated that they came from the South, they went back to Yam for yearly rituals. SMH at this troll!

I too have posted studies on crania and postcrania. Stating they were of African descent! lol

Simply put, ancient Egyptians were Southern Saharans-Sahelians!
Almoravid

Rotterdam, Netherlands

#1860 Jun 28, 2013
quote:

Mummies found along the Nile River show evidence that human alteration of the environment may have caused schistosomiasis, a water-borne parasitic disease that infects close to 200 million people in developing countries today.

Evidence of the disease was found in tissue samples of mummies from Nubia, a former kingdom located in present-day Sudan. The findings suggest that age-old irrigation techniques may have contributed to the spread of the disease, according to a study published in the June issue of the American Journal of Physical Anthropology.

"Often in the case of prehistoric populations, we tend to assume that they were at the mercy of the environment," said Amber Campbell Hibbs, lead investigator and anthropologist at Emory University in Atlanta. "Our study suggests that just like people today, these ancient individuals were capable of altering the environment in ways that impacted their health."

The researchers examined mummies from two Nubian populations who lived along the Nile in Northern Sudan, the Wadi Halfa people who lived approximately 1,500 years ago and the Kulubnarti who lived about 1,200 years ago.

Researchers found that 25 percent of the 46 mummies studied from the Wadi Halfa population were infected with Schistosoma mansoni, a species of schistosomiasis associated with modern-day irrigation techniques, compared with 9 percent of the 191 mummies analyzed from Kulubnarti population.

While archeological evidence indicates that the Wadi Halfa used canal irrigation to sustain multiple crops, evidence for irrigation among the Kulubnarti is lacking.

“The largest determinant of transmission is exposure to contaminated water sources,” Campbell Hibbs said.“In terms of factors known to influence the prevalence of schistosomiasis in modern populations, irrigation is the key factor.”

Schistosomiasis, also known as bilharzia, is caused by parasitic worms that live in freshwater snails. The disease ranks second to malaria as the most socio-economically devastating parasitic diseases in the world, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Today schistosomiasis, which causes anemia, malnutrition and chronic illness that impairs growth and cognitive development, affects populations in Asia, Africa and South America, particularly in places with poor water sanitation.

Irrigation canals create the ideal environment for the snails because standing water causes sediment to build at the bottom of the canal and encourages vegetative growth that keeps the snails alive, Campbell Hibbs said.

People become infected after coming in contact with contaminated water. When the parasite leaves the snail it burrows into the skin. According to the CDC, the parasites migrate through the person’s tissue and mature into adult worms in the blood vessels of the body.

When the male and female worms mate, their eggs travel to the bladder or intestine. And if the eggs do not pass into the urine or stool, they could become lodged in the intestine or bladder causing inflammation or scarring.

Prehistoric populations such as the Wadi Halfa may have been exposed to the disease when they entered the canals to clean out the silt and vegetation that was clogging the canals, Campbell Hibbs said.

Dr. Jean-Luc Benoit, associate professor of medicine and director of the University of Chicago Travel Clinic, said though travelers could become infected if they enter contaminated waters, the risk and complications are greater for people who live in those countries.

“It’s a very different disease in travelers than in people who live in countries where the disease is very prevalent,” he said.“Travelers likely get exposed to only a few of these worms, but people who live there swim, wade or bathe in the ponds and lakes are infected by many more parasites over a longer period of time.”

http://news.medill.northwestern.edu/chicago/n...
Almoravid

Rotterdam, Netherlands

#1861 Jun 28, 2013
LOL

Turning to what can be learned about cultural practices and disease, the individuals from Taforalt, the largest sample by far, display little evidence of trauma, though they do suggest a high incidence of infant mortality, with evidence for dental caries, arthritis, and rheumatism among other degenerative conditions. Interestingly, Taforalt also provides one of the oldest known instances of the practice of trepanation, the surgical removal of a portion of the cranium; the patient evidently survived for some time, as there are signs of bone regrowth in the affected area.

->Another form of body modification was much more widespread and, indeed, a distinctive feature of the Iberomaurusian skeletal sample as a whole. This was the practice of removing two or more of the upper incisors, usually around puberty and from both males and females, something that probably served as both a rite of passage and an ethnic marker (Close and Wendorf 1990), just as it does in parts of sub-Saharan Africa today (e.g., van Reenen 1987). <-

Cranial and postcranial malformations are also apparent and may indicate pronounced endogamy at a much more localised level (Hadjouis 2002), perhaps supported by the degree of variability between different site samples noted by Irish (2000).

--Lawrence Barham
The First Africans: African Archaeology from the Earliest Toolmakers to Most Recent Foragers (Cambridge World Archaeology)
asho

Eskilstuna, Sweden

#1862 Jun 28, 2013
Sinajuavi wrote:
<quoted text>
Cro-Magnon did not migrate directly from Africa to Europe, as you are trying to suggest, as usual, lying Afronazi racist.
Cro-Magnon had been for many millenia in the Mideast before entering Europe.
The Neolithic arose when the Natufian culture disappeared. The Neolithics cannot be called Natufians. They were Mideasterners who'd absorbed the Natufians. Even the Natufians themselves morphologically were clearly mixed with Mideasterners long before their culture disappeared.
Of course you are trying to make Anatolia black, but you fail as always.
Cro-Magnon may have migrated directly from Africa and in short space of time adapted to european conditions. Besides there could have been different black races in Africa.

First Europeans 35,000 years ago.

http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Almoravid

Rotterdam, Netherlands

#1863 Jun 28, 2013
asho wrote:
<quoted text>
Cro-Magnon may have migrated directly from Africa and in short space of time adapted to european conditions. Besides there could have been different black races in Africa.
First Europeans 35,000 years ago.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =Ejh03Ec47f0XX
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Reread my post on Cro Magnons. They papers cited state, there were Cro Magnons with several facial traits.

And there are "different races" is a bogus approach, this is why I have posted Africans from the so-called sub Sahara, with similar different facial traits to disprove the Eurocentric stereotype. As the juxtaposition "North African". Even thou you'll find people in North Africa with stereotypical sub Saharan traits. People who haven't been to these places are always the most ignorant and arrogant as we can see in this threat.

It's simply all a bit more complex.

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#1864 Jun 28, 2013
asho wrote:
<quoted text>
Cro-Magnon may have migrated directly from Africa and in short space of time adapted to european conditions. Besides there could have been different black races in Africa.
First Europeans 35,000 years ago.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =Ejh03Ec47f0XX
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
No. Cro-Magnon was of Y-type I, daughter of IJ. J is the type of Semitic Mideasterners. IJ descends from CF, a type appearing in Eurasia just after the OOA migration. So Cro-Magnon's ancestors had to have been out of Africa at least by 60,000 years ago.

Many Eurasian genetic types arose in the Mideast in the tens of millenia after OOA. Most of those then migrated out, mostly to India and beyond, some up into Central Asia, and the Cro-Magnon, obviously, into Europe.
Jus

Eskilstuna, Sweden

#1866 Jun 28, 2013
Sinajuavi wrote:
<quoted text>
No. Cro-Magnon was of Y-type I, daughter of IJ. J is the type of Semitic Mideasterners. IJ descends from CF, a type appearing in Eurasia just after the OOA migration. So Cro-Magnon's ancestors had to have been out of Africa at least by 60,000 years ago.
Many Eurasian genetic types arose in the Mideast in the tens of millenia after OOA. Most of those then migrated out, mostly to India and beyond, some up into Central Asia, and the Cro-Magnon, obviously, into Europe.
There could have been other Y-types besides I among Cro-Magnon as there are today among europeans and arabs. Today we got R, I, E, K, G and J. I wonder what the Y-chromosome of the first europeans was?

Level 5

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#1867 Jun 28, 2013
Pay close attention to the words used by the racist suspects(white people) when questioned. They are masterful deceivers and are good at diverting the context of a discussion. Keep an mental note of everything that is said and stay consistent with your testimony. You are trying to advocate the victim in a room full of devils.

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#1868 Jun 28, 2013
Jus wrote:
<quoted text>
There could have been other Y-types besides I among Cro-Magnon as there are today among europeans and arabs. Today we got R, I, E, K, G and J. I wonder what the Y-chromosome of the first europeans was?
We know from where those other types in Europe came. The original Homo sapiens in Europe were type I. No others were present.

R came from the immigration of Aryan speakers from the steppes. E was brought in by Neolithics, as was G and J. K is ancient Mideastern.

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#1869 Jun 28, 2013
Queen_Nefertari wrote:
Pay close attention to the words used by the racist suspects(white people) when questioned. They are masterful deceivers and are good at diverting the context of a discussion. Keep an mental note of everything that is said and stay consistent with your testimony. You are trying to advocate the victim in a room full of devils.
Notice that misguided racist Afronazi cultists can never back up their supremacist assertions with evidence. They twist data, post irrelevancies, divert, contort and do quite a dance trying to hide that in fact they're uneducated pseudo-intellectual racist supremacist fakes.

Get a real education.
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#1870 Jun 28, 2013
Almoravid wrote:
<quoted text>
You're right, according to Wiki and Mathildas blog!LOL
SMH
I've posted numerous studies, stating different. SMH
Ancient Egytians themselves stated that they came from the South, they went back to Yam for yearly rituals. SMH at this troll!
I too have posted studies on crania and postcrania. Stating they were of African descent! lol
Simply put, ancient Egyptians were Southern Saharans-Sahelians!
Yes mixed heavily with Eurasians!
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#1871 Jun 28, 2013
asho wrote:
<quoted text>
Cro-Magnon may have migrated directly from Africa and in short space of time adapted to european conditions. Besides there could have been different black races in Africa.
First Europeans 35,000 years ago.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =Ejh03Ec47f0XX
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
READ VERY SLOWLY:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cro-Magnon
Cro-Magnon has F**k all to do with African and looked exactly like modern Europeans. Stop talking cr*p. Their skeletons have been found in Europe and the Middle East THEY WERE CAUCASIAN DUMMY!
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#1872 Jun 28, 2013
Queen_Nefertari wrote:
Pay close attention to the words used by the racist suspects(white people) when questioned. They are masterful deceivers and are good at diverting the context of a discussion. Keep an mental note of everything that is said and stay consistent with your testimony. You are trying to advocate the victim in a room full of devils.
You Afronazis are extreme racists not to mention stupid! No one in the whole world believed your dumb rantings!
Almoravid

Rotterdam, Netherlands

#1873 Jun 28, 2013
Queen_Nefertari wrote:
Pay close attention to the words used by the racist suspects(white people) when questioned. They are masterful deceivers and are good at diverting the context of a discussion. Keep an mental note of everything that is said and stay consistent with your testimony. You are trying to advocate the victim in a room full of devils.
Consigned!

Quote:
"Nor does the picture get any clearer when we move on to the Cro-Magnons, the presumed ancestors of modern Europeans. Some looked more like present-day Australians or Africans, judged by OBJECTIVE anatomical categorizations, as is the case with some early modern skulls from the Upper Cave at Zhoukoudian in China."

From the Am J Phys Anthropol. 1975 May;42(3):351-69,
Almoravid

Rotterdam, Netherlands

#1875 Jun 29, 2013
African AE wrote:
<quoted text>Yes mixed heavily
with Eurasians!
Of which is NO prove, but mere Eurocentric pipe dream fantasy. I have shown this over and over again!LOL

quote:
The dates of admixture (assuming 30 years
per generation)42 are reported in Table 1. Notably, in most
of the Semitic, Cushitic, and Omotic populations, the
admixture of African and non-African ancestry components
dates to 2.5–3 kya, whereas in North Africa, the
admixture dates are ~2 ky more recent, clustering around
1 kya, consistent with previous reports.
--Pagani et al 2012

quote:
What we can say, however, is that in the Holocene, humans from southwest Asia do not exhibit tropically adapted body shape (Crognier 1981; Eveleth and Tanner 1976; Schreider 1975).... "
---Trenton Holliday (2000) Evolution at the
Crossroads: Modern Human Emergence in Western
Asia. American Anthropologist. New Series, Vol. 102, No. 1, 54-68

quote:
In fact, in terms of body shape, the European and the Inuit samples tend to be cold-adapted and tend to be separated in multivariate space from the more tropically adapted Africans, especially those groups from south of the Sahara.
--Holliday TW, Hilton CE.
Body proportions of circumpolar peoples as evidenced from skeletal data: Ipiutak and Tigara (Point Hope) versus Kodiak Island Inuit.

quote:
"Analysis of Predinastic skeletal material showed tropical African elements in the population of the earliest populations of the earliest Badarian culture" [...]
--Frank Yurco

quote:
Northern Egyptians group with Africans: QUOTE – Smith 2002:
"Limb length proportions in males from Maadi and Merimde group them
with African rather than European populations. Mean femur length in
males from Maadi was similar to that recorded at Byblos and the early
Bronze Age male from Kabri, but mean tibia length in Maadi males was
6.9cm longer than that at Byblos. At Merimde both bones were longer
than at the other sites shown, but again, the tibia was longer proportionate
to femurs than at Byblos (Fig 6.2), reinforcing the impression of an
African rather than Levantine affinity.“
-- Smith, P.(2002) The palaeo-biological evidence for admix.. In: Egypt & the Levant.. Leicester Univ. 118-28

quote:
Little change in body shape was found through time, suggesting that all body segments were varying in size in response to environmental and social conditions. The change found in body plan is suggested to be the result of the later groups having a more tropical (Nilotic) form than the preceding populations.
--Sonia R. Zakrzewski, American Journal of&#65279; Physical Anthropology
Volume 121, Issue 3, pages 219–229, July 2003

quote:
The results indicate overall population continuity over the Predynastic and early Dynastic, and high levels of genetic heterogeneity, thereby suggesting that state formation occurred as a mainly indigenous process. Nevertheless, significant differences were found in morphology between both geographically-pooled and cemetery-specific temporal groups, indicating that some migration occurred along the Egyptian Nile Valley over the periods&time; studied.
--Am J Phys Anthropol, 2007

quote:
African peoples are the most diverse in the world whether analyzed by DNA or skeletal or cranial methods. The peoples of the Nile Valley vary but they are still related. The people most related ethnically to the ancient Egyptians are other Africans like Nubians not cold-climate/light skinned Europeans or Asiatics.(Keita 1996; Rethelford, 2001; Bianchi 2004, Yurco 1989; Godde 2009)
Almoravid

Rotterdam, Netherlands

#1876 Jun 29, 2013
The Battle of Kadesh

From: the Ramesseum, Thebes, Egypt
Date: 19th Dynasty, about 1250 BC

This is a colossal bust of the pharaoh Ramesses II ‘the great’. At the start of his reign he did a lot of fighting in order to keep his empire together. In 1274 BC he lead a huge army of 20,000 men northwards towards the Hittite Empire. The Hittite king Muwatalli II tricked Ramesses into thinking that his army were far away, then sprung an ambush. The resulting Battle of Kadesh was probably the largest battle of ancient times, involving up to 6000 chariots.

The result of the battle was not a clear win for either side, and both armies lost many men. However, after returning to Egypt Ramesses was quick to claim victory, saying that the Hittites had fled across the river ‘swimming as fast as any crocodile’.

http://www.britishmuseum.org/explore/young_ex...

http://www.lessingimages.com/search.asp...
Who Dat

Sugar Land, TX

#1877 Jun 29, 2013
You can use all the lies and propaganda all you want. You guys should've worked for "Hitler" as an addition to his propaganda ministries.

You can come up with all the OO and AA's but what you guys need is AAA to sober up! Certain events in history are design to mislead people for generations! Egyptian history is at the echelon/climax of falsification when it come to true African heritage in that region.

How about this, I once lived on the moon where it's hot, I was sent alien mail which read, there is a place on earth called America. Caucasoid people are the oldest living humans to have inherit such a bountiful land. Them being the first people of that land mass, they built that country of such huge expanse into what it is today before any other migrating ethnic people landed on it's shores. Then African people were brought over seas after it was modernized to do the house work. But they didn't partake in the building of America.

I'm sure you guys would love for history to reflect exactly like that huh?
African AE wrote:
<quoted text>I live in Africa. I dont know if anyone has noticed. In Sub-Saharan Africa if you are a mixed race person (like myself) YOU ARE NOT CONSIDERED A BLACK AFRICAN! Most AA people if they moved to Sub-Saharan Africa WOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED BLACK! North African have always been mixed race and ARE NOT CONSIDERED BLACK AFRICANS! If Khafre (who looks exactly like my mixed race cousin) lived in Southern African, HE WOULD BE CONSIDERED MIXED RACE! The way Africa looks at race and the way Americans look at race is two different things. As for that dumb *hole Keita who claims that the ancient Egyptians were a different type of African, YES YOU AHOLE THEY WERE MIXED RACE!!! MIXED WITH EURASIANS!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Our Opinion: Making progress on Pittsfield's wo... 4 min Cops are Degenerates 2
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min positronium 1,508,016
Listen guy, y'all think we could start over? 5 min IT IS I 58
This good ol' boy never meant no harm! 5 min Ben 1,957
RMG : Was there surveillance at Trump Tower ? 6 min NotSoDivineMsM 24
Least Attractive Women? 8 min ARYAN WARRIOR 7
Can white men sexually satisfy black women better? (Mar '15) 12 min Sexyni7 71
Are you tired of Blacks? 26 min We Wuz Kangs 71
I'm a married white women having sex with Black... (Jun '10) 3 hr misfit 0676 203
White men are the solution for the single black... 5 hr IT IS I 101
More from around the web