The Ancient Egyptians were black! Fin...

“Try harder :)”

Level 8

Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

#1808 Jun 27, 2013
I would like to thank Almoravid for holding it down while I was busy working. Good job!

I still see Barros is still damage controlling due not being able to post a single hint of evidence agreeing with him. LMAO!!!

Level 4

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#1809 Jun 27, 2013
"Herodotus: "there were eighteen Ethiopian kings, and one queen, native to the country" (The Histories, Book 2:100)

"Colchians are an Egyptian race .... the fact that they are black-skinned and have woolly hair, which certainly amounts to but little, since several other nations are so too." (The Histories, Book 2:104)"

“Try harder :)”

Level 8

Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

#1810 Jun 27, 2013
Sinajuavi wrote:
<quoted text>
Still no evidence showing the genetic composition of the predynastic Lower Egyptian population, lying racist pseudo-intellectual Afronazi cult boy.
No buddy, we asked YOU to post genetic evidence since you think there is genetic testing down on early Egyptian population.

Again where are they???:)

Eurofck cult boy...:)
Sinajuavi wrote:
There were people of Eurasian ancestry in predynastic Lower Egypt, boy.
Where's your evidence of a significant Eurasian population in Lower Egypt boy???

WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???

WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???

WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???

WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???

WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???

WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???

WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???

WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???

WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???

WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???
Sinajuavi wrote:
You prevaricating racist cultists have claimed that only blacks were there. But you cannot provide evidence for that.
And you know what will happen when I finally post the pertinent evidence... LOL!!! As always, you Afronazis will be left eating a $hitcake.
Nobody said it was ONLY 'blacks'. But I already PROVEN that there was very LITTLE gene flow going into Lower Egypt while there was mostly African gene flow going OUT of Lower Egypt and into the Levant.

But where's your evidence? B*tch...

Like Almoravid stated a million times anthropology and archaeology doesn't show Eurasians coming into Lower Egypt. The Egyptians as a population by and large if not all stem from an indigenous *African* stock. There has been little if any evidence of any migrations from Asia or the Mediterranean during pre-Dynastic times. On the contrary, we have evidence of the *opposite*-- Africans migrating out of the Nile Delta and INTO Asia and the Mediterranean:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1...

^^^I've posted this million times which YOU IGNORED.

Historically it is known that all throughout dynastic history, the majority of indigenous Egyptians lived in the VALLEY REGION and NOT the Delta. From Medieval times up until today, the vast majority of Egyptians live in the Delta. We all know the Delta was the point of entry for all invasions and that is the case.

Then we have this which DEBUNKS your whole argument altogether..
http://i1079.photobucket.com/albums/w513/Amun...

You clearly see the Ancient Egyptians ANCESTORS settling along the Nile and moving North(and NOT south). 8,500 there was NO settlements in the Delta region until later. Then we see desertification and that's the ancestors of the Ancient Egyptians start to move more NORTH. BUT...Here's when you completely LOSE. LMAO!!!

The FIRST settlements in the Delta are in the southwest and NOT the northeast which throws a GIANT HOLE into the idea that the Delta people were of Asiatic origin.

LMAO! You lost a long time ago and you are too slow to even realize it. That's the sad part.
Sinajuavi wrote:
Already your own sources have contradicted your claims, boy. Your racism is punked & debunked even by your own material, you blithering fumbling bumbling fool.
Afronazi putz.
Me and Almoravid explained that to you a million times yet you are too slow to comprehend! So I'll just have to drill it into you some more...

->>> If there was a south-north cline variation along the Nile valley it did not, from this limited evidence, continue smoothly on into southern Palestine. <<<-

^^Again...Basically meaning if that had variation it was NOT DUE to being mixed with Levantines!

Give up Barros we fcked you and your Euofck buddies up badly!

“Try harder :)”

Level 8

Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

#1811 Jun 27, 2013
Sinajuavi wrote:
You Afronazis make the error however of acknowledging this diversity and then turning around and pretending there is no great difference, that there is some uniform “black” thing going on... when it suits your argument. Be consistent, please.
Oh give me a break Mister Eurofck...You're the one who's NEVER consistent.

YES, Africans are indeed very diverse genetically because they are the source population for all mankind. The older a population is, the more accumulation of genetic variation and thus diversity. However, greater diversity does NOT mean less relativity. For example, even among the gene pool of a single isolated population where much inbreeding has occurred there is still some form of variation or diversity. It may not be as much as say a larger population that has much contact and geneflow with other populations. Still even among the gene pool of a single family there is genetic variation also even if all members are related to one another. The same can be said of Africans. Genetically there are many clades and subclades and even variation within subclades that are to be found among Africans, yet just because you have individuals who carry lineages of a certain clade does not mean they are not related or even share other genetic characteristics with individuals who carry lineages of another clade, especially if all these individuals reside within the same community or region. Because Africans have such tremendous genetic diversity, there is actually more genetic variation within a single village in Africa than there is in say a state in the U.S. or a nation in Europe, but that doesn't mean all these villagers have no relation to one another! An even BETTER example would be chimpanzees, our closest related species. The chimp species is even older than humans which is why their genetic diversity is even greater still. Two individual chimpanzees of the same population in the same forest have more genetic variations between them than two individual humans who live in opposite ends of the globe, but that does not mean they are unrelated! Again this is the EXACT same case for Africans. And nobody(I can't speak for everyone) mentions the word black. I know Africans are phenotypically diverse also, which is why I stated A MILLION TIMES that I have CEASED using the word black in discussions like this because its not that tangible. Even with phenotype diversity, almost all Africans are binded together via PN2 clade.
Sinajuavi wrote:
Y'all are playing a game here, trying to pretend that my argument is that no blacks were in Lower Egypt. In fact I am saying that both black Africans and Eurasians (Mideasterners) were in Lower Egypt in predynastic times. Over those 25,000 years or so, were there more blacks or Eurasians? I can't say with certainty, but I would think it more likely that most were black.
But that isn't good enough for you cultist racists, no, every man woman and child ever in predynastic Lower Egypt has to be black African, 100%, lol. Y'all are obsessive and irrational.
No the only one playing games here is you and only YOU. The thing is we asked YOU for evidence of significant Eurasian population pre-dynastic times whether it be physical remains or DNA, yet you failed to provide both to us. You tried to say there were Eurasians in Lower Egypt for 30k years, but me and Almoravid BUSTED you on that. Now you're saying MOST were 'black' after a bunch of evidence were thrown at you. Again gene flow into Lower Egypt was very LITTLE...Most Eurasian gene flow came during the dynastic times. Yes there was some gene flow from the Levant into Lower Egypt but again it was LITTLE. You're the one being irrational here buddy.

Again we're STILL waiting for your evidence. And please don't count on that idi*t African AE, because his own sources debunks him.

Level 4

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#1812 Jun 27, 2013
Diodorus Siculus (60 b.c.) wrote:

"The Aithiopians [Ethiopians] say that the Egyptians are settlers from among themselves and that Osiris was the leader of the settlement.The customs of the Egyptians, they say, are for the most part Aithiopian, the settlers having preserved their old traditions. For to consider the kings gods, to pay great attention to funeral rites, and many other things, are Aithiopian practices, and also the style of their statues and the form of their writing are Aithiopian. Also the way the priestly colleges are organized is said to be the same in both nations. For all who have to do with the cult of the gods, they maintain, are [ritually] pure: the priests are shaved in the same way, they have the same robes and the type of scepter shaped like a plough, which also the kings have, who use tall pointed felt hats ending in a knob, with the snakes that they call the asp (aspis) coiled round them."

Aristotle makes reference to the hair form of Egyptians and Ethiopians: "Why are the Ethiopians and Egyptians bandy-legged? Is it because the bodies of living creatures become distorted by heat, like logs of wood when they become dry? The condition of their hair supports this theory; for it is curlier than that of other nations, and curliness is as it were crookedness of the hair."

(Physiognomics, Book XIV, p. 317)

The evidence of Lucian (Greek writer, 125 B.C.) is as explicit as that of the previous writers. He introduces two Greeks, Lycinus and Timolaus, who start a conversation:

Lycinus (describing a young Egyptian): "This boy is not merely black; he has thick lips and his legs are too thin ... his hair worn in a plait behind shows that he is not a freeman."

Timolaus: "But that is a sign of really distinguished birth in Egypt, Lycinus, All freeborn children plait their hair until they reach manhood. It is the exact opposite of the custom of our ancestors who thought it seemly for old men to secure their hair with a gold brooch to keep it in place."

(Lucian, Navigations, paras 2-3)

And lastly, one of my fave videos depicting the royalty of the Arab conquerors of Kemet and the stark contrast between them and the African natives..

http://youtu.be/01nPO3Hmkb0

“Try harder :)”

Level 8

Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

#1813 Jun 27, 2013
LMAO!!!! Please tell you're joking with this!
Sinajuavi wrote:
<quoted text>
In cultural terms, Berber may be a problematic term. However, in terms of ancestry, you are correct.
The Eurasians in Lower Egypt in predynastic times would have to have been very similar to the Eurasians of the Maghreb, as they'd come from the same region (Mideast) and by the same route from Levant to the Nile Valley and Delta.
Too bad theres no U6 found in Egypt.:)

Sorry...
Sinajuavi wrote:
I suspect that the known Berber language was brought in by Capsians or Neolithics,and so the original ancestors of Eurasian Lower Egyptians as well as the Maghreb spoke another older language, and certainly did not call themselves “Amazigh” or anything similar. Nonetheless, they were ancestral to the Amazigh and to Lower Egyptians.
LMAO!!! OMG this is too funny! I hope you know that there is a 'Kenyan' Capsian culture. The Capsian culture is NOT Eurasian in origins.

And please STOP claiming the Afro-Asiatic language as African when you have been debunked by others many times.

"...the crucial linguistic finding is that the three deepest clades of the Afro-Asiatic family are localized in Eritrea and Ethiopia. All the other languages of the family outside that region belong to subclades of just one of those deep clades. This kind of cladistic distribution is a basic criterion of the genetic argument for the genetic lineage origins well understood by geneticists. It applies to linguistic history as well." (Ancient Local Evolution of African mtDNA Haplogroups in Tunisian Berber Populations). Frigi et al. Human Biology, 82:4, August, 2010)

You whine and b*tch about 'Afronazi's' claiming Non African things yet you go around and try to claim AA language you SNAKE. The Berber language is AFRICAN! DEAL WITH IT.

Also where is the U6 in Egypt?
Sinajuavi wrote:
Afronazis cannot accept this, but Siwa in the past was not the eastern limit of the Berbers. Before the growth and expansion of Egyptian civilization, originating in Upper Egypt, the culture of part of Lower Egypt and coastal Egypt was not of a separate type from that of the Berbers of the Maghreb, but part of a cultural continuum from Morocco to northeastern Egypt.
Do you have any proof for this claim??? Again proto Berbers came from Northeast Africa and not no Near East. Are you also now trying to claim the Siwa Berbers.

Anyways E-M81 which is the Berber marker originated in Northeast Africa.
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-RFDBC3MrhRc/TwSONGT...

Where it spread into the Maghreb. Too bad the Y-DNA of the Berbers is mainly African.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Y-DNA_haplogroup...

While their mtDNA is diverse...Also Mister Eurofck explain why U6 is not only found in the Maghreb but also parts in West and East Africa where the carriers live in ISOLATED areas. Do those people too share an ancestor with Berbers.

You see, your claims has so many holes its not even funny.

Level 4

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#1814 Jun 27, 2013
ALL of history white washed, all of it. The Greeks (before the Romans came), depicted their own/heroes like Hercules as black, as he'd handle women/amazons (depicted as white) and monsters in vases/murals. Hercules is derived from Heru/Horus, just as the word "hero" is.

Big Herc and Hermes in battle (notice Hermes staff to the left)
http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b387/AtomEl...

Heraclions/Heraclides (sons of Hercules) Ancient Minoan fresco:

http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b387/AtomEl...

Early Hermes (when they depicted him with a beard) being flocked by a bunch of chicks:
http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b387/AtomEl...

Prometheus getting his guts ate out (notice the dreadlocks):
http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b387/AtomEl...

"Perseus rendered his name immortal by his conquest of Medusa. He cut off her head, and the blood that dropped from the wound produced the innumerable serpents that infest Africa."

Perseus saving Andromeda from the sea monster sent by demons (who sired the Nephilim/Anu/false gods)

http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b387/AtomEl...

Level 4

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#1815 Jun 27, 2013
Haters in denial lol.. pathetic.

And my bad on the Prometheus mis-post. Here's him & Hercules + dreadlocks..

http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b387/AtomEl...

Obvious as hell why Ceasar burned down the Library in so-called Alexandria Egypt. He wanted to annihilate much of the proof of the African origins of all Greek myth, because he was inherently [email protected] and jealous. The destruction was completed by the Arab Muslim Caliph Omar.

Near-accurate Roman depiction of Hermes (they made fun of big penises btw((true story)):

http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b387/AtomEl...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aethiopis

^^ Lost epic(s)my ass.. more like DESTROYED! Part of the great deception @ the time of the end via Satan and his destructive, habitually lying offspring. Historical characters like Perseus and Andromeda were UNDENIABLY African!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andromeda_ (mythology)

Andromeda for instance, depicted as lilly white in ALL her depictions, even though the accounts state that she was the doughter of an Ethiopian King!

And of course, Perseus, always depicted with the curved blade that the Europeans knew NOTHING about and couldn't possibly reproduce, seen here:

http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b387/AtomEl...

http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m10p75RKUV1...

The pre-deluge sickle, precurser to the Katara AND Katana (Kataras were also weilded by the Moor). But low and behold, whites further white it out by making the sword look Romanish and broad, like the claymore for the movie "clash of the titans":

http://www.figures.com/forums/attachments/new...

Perseus in Romanized (BULL-SHIT) armor!:
http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb2012012...

Lol.. none of them existed durring the time the false gods came, not even the Greek! All of these are rehashed accounts of our $#!+!

According to the accounts, Perseus flew from West Africa across the Atlas mountains (in Africa), stopping in Egypt before heading over to Ethiopia to save Andromeda from a massive sea monster sent by the 'gods'(Nephilim/Anunaki) whom the Ethiopians failed to worship properly.
trollslayer

Hammond, IN

#1816 Jun 27, 2013
African AE wrote:
<quoted text> MODERN EGYPTIANS ARE RELATED TO ANCIENT EGYPTIANS! They carry ancient Eurasian DNA and their MAIN Haplogroup is E-M78 just like the ancient Egyptians!
big mike M wrote:
<quoted text>
Stop posting...LMAO!!! You're literally killing your whole argument without even knowing it!
Please let Barros do the debating for you.
how bad have things got....when 1 troll is so awful, another1 has to stand-in for him.

Level 4

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#1817 Jun 27, 2013
Herodotus also asserted that "the names of nearly all the gods came to Greece from Egypt ... for the names of all the gods have been known in Egypt from the beginning of time ... It was the Egyptians too who originated, and taught the Greeks ... ceremonial meeting, processions and liturgies ... The Egyptians were also the first to assign each month and each day to a particular deity, and to foretell the date of a man's birth, his character, his fortunes, and the day of his death ... The Egyptians, too have made more use of omens and prognostics than any other nation..."

(Herodotus, The Histories, 149-150; 152; 159).

----------

Stephanus of Byzantium, who is said to represent the opinions of the most ancient Greeks, says:

"Ethiopia was the first established country on the earth, and the Ethiopians were the first who introduced the worship of the Gods and who established laws."

Quoted by John D. Baldwin, Prehistoric Nations, p. 62.

Level 4

Since: May 12

Philadelphia, PA

#1818 Jun 27, 2013
omg the Eurocentrics have been decimated in this thread.

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#1819 Jun 27, 2013
big mike M wrote:
<quoted text>
No buddy, we asked YOU to post genetic evidence since you think there is genetic testing down on early Egyptian population.
Again where are they???:)
Eurofck cult boy...:)
<quoted text>
Where's your evidence of a significant Eurasian population in Lower Egypt boy???
WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???
WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???
WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???
WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???
WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???
WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???
WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???
WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???
WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???
WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???
<quoted text>
Nobody said it was ONLY 'blacks'. But I already PROVEN that there was very LITTLE gene flow going into Lower Egypt while there was mostly African gene flow going OUT of Lower Egypt and into the Levant.
But where's your evidence? B*tch...
Like Almoravid stated a million times anthropology and archaeology doesn't show Eurasians coming into Lower Egypt. The Egyptians as a population by and large if not all stem from an indigenous *African* stock. There has been little if any evidence of any migrations from Asia or the Mediterranean during pre-Dynastic times. On the contrary, we have evidence of the *opposite*-- Africans migrating out of the Nile Delta and INTO Asia and the Mediterranean:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1...
^^^I've posted this million times which YOU IGNORED.
Historically it is known that all throughout dynastic history, the majority of indigenous Egyptians lived in the VALLEY REGION and NOT the Delta. From Medieval times up until today, the vast majority of Egyptians live in the Delta. We all know the Delta was the point of entry for all invasions and that is the case.
Then we have this which DEBUNKS your whole argument altogether..
http://i1079.photobucket.com/albums/w513/Amun...
You clearly see the Ancient Egyptians ANCESTORS settling along the Nile and moving North(and NOT south). 8,500 there was NO settlements in the Delta region until later. Then we see desertification and that's the ancestors of the Ancient Egyptians start to move more NORTH. BUT...Here's when you completely LOSE. LMAO!!!
The FIRST settlements in the Delta are in the southwest and NOT the northeast which throws a GIANT HOLE into the idea that the Delta people were of Asiatic origin.
LMAO! You lost a long time ago and you are too slow to even realize it. That's the sad part.
<quoted text>
Me and Almoravid explained that to you a million times yet you are too slow to comprehend! So I'll just have to drill it into you some more...
->>> If there was a south-north cline variation along the Nile valley it did not, from this limited evidence, continue smoothly on into southern Palestine. <<<-
^^Again...Basically meaning if that had variation it was NOT DUE to being mixed with Levantines!
Give up Barros we fcked you and your Euofck buddies up badly!
No, lying Afronazi boy, you fools claimed that predynastic Lower Egypt was 100% black, so let's see the proof, fools.

LOL at your prevarication.

LIAR! You all were claiming only blacks were there in predynastic times. NO EURASIANS you lying bastard cultist racist Afronazis said.

How pathetic you are, boy.

Wrong, boy, we have evidence of Eurasians moving into Africa 30,000 years ago, to the Maghreb (via Lower Egypt), as well as Capsians and Neolithics following the same route.

LOL at your idiocy, boy. You lie, you twist, you contort, and you lie some more..... and you can never win, boy.

Let's see that evidence, you lying racist turd.

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#1820 Jun 27, 2013
Triceroy wrote:
Herodotus also asserted that "the names of nearly all the gods came to Greece from Egypt ... for the names of all the gods have been known in Egypt from the beginning of time ... It was the Egyptians too who originated, and taught the Greeks ... ceremonial meeting, processions and liturgies ... The Egyptians were also the first to assign each month and each day to a particular deity, and to foretell the date of a man's birth, his character, his fortunes, and the day of his death ... The Egyptians, too have made more use of omens and prognostics than any other nation..."
(Herodotus, The Histories, 149-150; 152; 159).
----------
Stephanus of Byzantium, who is said to represent the opinions of the most ancient Greeks, says:
"Ethiopia was the first established country on the earth, and the Ethiopians were the first who introduced the worship of the Gods and who established laws."
Quoted by John D. Baldwin, Prehistoric Nations, p. 62.
Then why does Greek “mythology” resemble so much that of other Aryans from Irish to Hindus?

Explain that, deluded Afronazi boy.

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#1821 Jun 27, 2013
big mike M wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh give me a break Mister Eurofck...You're the one who's NEVER consistent.
YES, Africans are indeed very diverse genetically because they are the source population for all mankind. The older a population is, the more accumulation of genetic variation and thus diversity. However, greater diversity does NOT mean less relativity. For example, even among the gene pool of a single isolated population where much inbreeding has occurred there is still some form of variation or diversity. It may not be as much as say a larger population that has much contact and geneflow with other populations. Still even among the gene pool of a single family there is genetic variation also even if all members are related to one another. The same can be said of Africans. Genetically there are many clades and subclades and even variation within subclades that are to be found among Africans, yet just because you have individuals who carry lineages of a certain clade does not mean they are not related or even share other genetic characteristics with individuals who carry lineages of another clade, especially if all these individuals reside within the same community or region. Because Africans have such tremendous genetic diversity, there is actually more genetic variation within a single village in Africa than there is in say a state in the U.S. or a nation in Europe, but that doesn't mean all these villagers have no relation to one another! An even BETTER example would be chimpanzees, our closest related species. The chimp species is even older than humans which is why their genetic diversity is even greater still. Two individual chimpanzees of the same population in the same forest have more genetic variations between them than two individual humans who live in opposite ends of the globe, but that does not mean they are unrelated! Again this is the EXACT same case for Africans. And nobody(I can't speak for everyone) mentions the word black. I know Africans are phenotypically diverse also, which is why I stated A MILLION TIMES that I have CEASED using the word black in discussions like this because its not that tangible. Even with phenotype diversity, almost all Africans are binded together via PN2 clade.
<quoted text>
No the only one playing games here is you and only YOU. The thing is we asked YOU for evidence of significant Eurasian population pre-dynastic times whether it be physical remains or DNA, yet you failed to provide both to us. You tried to say there were Eurasians in Lower Egypt for 30k years, but me and Almoravid BUSTED you on that. Now you're saying MOST were 'black' after a bunch of evidence were thrown at you. Again gene flow into Lower Egypt was very LITTLE...Most Eurasian gene flow came during the dynastic times. Yes there was some gene flow from the Levant into Lower Egypt but again it was LITTLE. You're the one being irrational here buddy.
Again we're STILL waiting for your evidence. And please don't count on that idi*t African AE, because his own sources debunks him.
What a load of convoluted rhetoric... an attempt to do just what I accused you of doing... being diverse and identical at the same time.

Face it, you're a pseudo-intellectual pathetic drooling dropout.
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#1822 Jun 27, 2013
Almoravid wrote:
<quoted text>
It's pathetic the way these Europeans are trying to steal our history!
With this sick individual Barros with multiple aliases on top of this game. We have posted peer reviewed studies, still this weirdo keeps ranting the same delusional unfound claim and fantasy. Which of course is completely FALSE, as has been proven over and over again!
Egyptians say THEIR ANCESTORS BUILT THE PYRAMIDS THE WHOLE WORLD AGREES!
No Sub-Saharan people built any pyramids!
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#1823 Jun 27, 2013
big mike M wrote:
<quoted text>
No buddy, we asked YOU to post genetic evidence since you think there is genetic testing down on early Egyptian population.
Again where are they???:)
Eurofck cult boy...:)
<quoted text>
Where's your evidence of a significant Eurasian population in Lower Egypt boy???
WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???
WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???
WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???
WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???
WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???
WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???
WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???
WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???
WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???
WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???
<quoted text>
Nobody said it was ONLY 'blacks'. But I already PROVEN that there was very LITTLE gene flow going into Lower Egypt while there was mostly African gene flow going OUT of Lower Egypt and into the Levant.
But where's your evidence? B*tch...
Like Almoravid stated a million times anthropology and archaeology doesn't show Eurasians coming into Lower Egypt. The Egyptians as a population by and large if not all stem from an indigenous *African* stock. There has been little if any evidence of any migrations from Asia or the Mediterranean during pre-Dynastic times. On the contrary, we have evidence of the *opposite*-- Africans migrating out of the Nile Delta and INTO Asia and the Mediterranean:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1...
^^^I've posted this million times which YOU IGNORED.
Historically it is known that all throughout dynastic history, the majority of indigenous Egyptians lived in the VALLEY REGION and NOT the Delta. From Medieval times up until today, the vast majority of Egyptians live in the Delta. We all know the Delta was the point of entry for all invasions and that is the case.
Then we have this which DEBUNKS your whole argument altogether..
http://i1079.photobucket.com/albums/w513/Amun...
You clearly see the Ancient Egyptians ANCESTORS settling along the Nile and moving North(and NOT south). 8,500 there was NO settlements in the Delta region until later. Then we see desertification and that's the ancestors of the Ancient Egyptians start to move more NORTH. BUT...Here's when you completely LOSE. LMAO!!!
The FIRST settlements in the Delta are in the southwest and NOT the northeast which throws a GIANT HOLE into the idea that the Delta people were of Asiatic origin.
LMAO! You lost a long time ago and you are too slow to even realize it. That's the sad part.
<quoted text>
Me and Almoravid explained that to you a million times yet you are too slow to comprehend! So I'll just have to drill it into you some more...
->>> If there was a south-north cline variation along the Nile valley it did not, from this limited evidence, continue smoothly on into southern Palestine. <<<-
^^Again...Basically meaning if that had variation it was NOT DUE to being mixed with Levantines!
Give up Barros we fcked you and your Euofck buddies up badly!
Strange thing modern Middle Eastern people have virtually NO Sub-Saharan DNA and are more related to neanderthals! The Indigenous Samaritans of Israel have 2% Sub-saharan DNA LOL Egyptians were extremely mixed race and always were!
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#1824 Jun 27, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
African AE wrote:
<quoted text> MODERN EGYPTIANS ARE RELATED TO ANCIENT EGYPTIANS! They carry ancient Eurasian DNA and their MAIN Haplogroup is E-M78 just like the ancient Egyptians!
<quoted text>
how bad have things got....when 1 troll is so awful, another1 has to stand-in for him.
The truth is THE WHOLE WORLD AND EGYPTIANS SAY the ancient Egyptians were very mixed race whether you and other Afronazis like it or not! END OF STORY!
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#1825 Jun 27, 2013
Almoravid wrote:
<quoted text>
Much of ancient Egyptians look like indigenous people from the South, tropical adapted Africans.
The ancient Egyptians came from the South, they related to people from South Sahara.
You have never set foot on African soil, including Egypt.
In Egypt, what they teach in textbooks is that the civilization arose in the South.
What ever you claim is BULLSH-T!
Ancient Egyptians are related to modern Egyptians. No Sub-Saharan Africans ever built any Pyramids. Ancient Egyptians looked just like the Coptic Christians of Egypt!
Who Dat

Sugar Land, TX

#1826 Jun 28, 2013
Few may have been Caucasoid, some even African Albinos witch is here..>>> http://www.bing.com/images/search...

But the ruling class was black/brown Africans...>>> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons...

http://wysinger.homestead.com/files/nubian_mu...

http://www.historyfiles.co.uk/images/Africa/E...

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lje443RFIc1...

http://artsales.com/images/nubian-tribute-huy...

So many more.
Sinajuavi wrote:
<quoted text>
Much of ancient Egyptian art shows people who look Eurasian, or Caucasoid you are calling them.
Much ancient Egyptian art also shows black people, obviously. Representations I've seen of Akhnaten seemed to be very obviously black to me, for example.
My impression of the face of the Sphinx also is that it is black.
But one cannot deny that non-blacks, Eurasians, Caucasoids, Mideasterners, are also present. They did not first appear in Egypt with the Hyksos, but many millenia earlier.
Who Dat

Sugar Land, TX

#1827 Jun 28, 2013

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Islam an empire of faith (Oct '12) 1 min enoch powell 7,203
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 min USAsince1680 1,418,276
UH OH! Trump back in lead! 1 min Bill Clintons Wife 1
Why aren't there any Negroes in the Bible? 2 min Moses 489
God says in the bible he will destroy white peo... (Mar '15) 5 min Trell40-C 15
Study finds White women not attracted to Black men (May '14) 5 min T-BOS 451
News Vote dilution was used to keep blacks off of Fe... 23 min Boss Taco 12
the moors were black africans not arabs!!! (Jun '08) 2 hr Moses 47,847
More from around the web