Comments
1,381 - 1,400 of 3,964 Comments Last updated May 14, 2014

“Try harder :)”

Level 8

Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

#1493 Jun 23, 2013
Almoravid wrote:
<quoted text>
The funny thing about bubble head Barros is, he doesn't understand that there is no PHYSICAL evidence. So he/ she / it rants about genetic intrusion. Yes, Lower Egyptians have a relatively high dosage of foreign ancestry, as is seen in the gene pool, however, these are from recent introductions, in the last couple of thousands of years. And on top of this, Eurasians /Asiatics (Arabs) were cold adapted and still are cold adapted.
quote:
What we can say, however, is that in the Holocene, humans from southwest Asia do not exhibit tropically adapted body shape (Crognier 1981; Eveleth and Tanner 1976; Schreider 1975).... "
---Trenton Holliday (2000) Evolution at the
Crossroads: Modern Human Emergence in Western
Asia. American Anthropologist. New Series, Vol. 102, No. 1, 54-68
Nor does the European:
quote:
In fact, in terms of body shape, the European and the Inuit samples tend to be cold-adapted and tend to be separated in multivariate space from the more tropically adapted Africans, especially those groups from south of the Sahara.
--Holliday TW, Hilton CE.
Body proportions of circumpolar peoples as evidenced from skeletal data: Ipiutak and Tigara (Point Hope) versus Kodiak Island Inuit.
Yeah I asked him for physical evidence for those Eurasians in the Maghreb, but he couldn't post them. LMAO!!!

“Try harder :)”

Level 8

Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

#1494 Jun 23, 2013
Almoravid wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, and this is all based on physical evidence. As well as the following:
quote:
"Analysis of Predinastic skeletal material showed tropical African elements in the population of the earliest populations of the earliest Badarian culture" [...]
--Frank Yurco
quote:
Little change in body shape was found through time, suggesting that all body segments were varying in size in response to environmental and social conditions. The change found in body plan is suggested to be the result of the later groups having a more tropical (Nilotic) form than the preceding populations.
--Sonia R. Zakrzewski, American Journal of&#65279; Physical Anthropology
Volume 121, Issue 3, pages 219229, July 2003
quote:
The results indicate overall population continuity over the Predynastic and early Dynastic, and high levels of genetic heterogeneity, thereby suggesting that state formation occurred as a mainly indigenous process. Nevertheless, significant differences were found in morphology between both geographically-pooled and cemetery-specific temporal groups, indicating that some migration occurred along the Egyptian Nile Valley over the periods&time; studied.
--Am J Phys Anthropol, 2007.
But it gets WORSE for him LMAO!
http://farm7.staticflickr.com/6212/6284194929...
^^^Ancient Egyptians as a whole showed more biological affinity to people of the SOUTH.

Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#1495 Jun 23, 2013
Almoravid wrote:
<quoted text>
The funny thing about bubble head Barros is, he doesn't understand that there is no PHYSICAL evidence. So he/ she / it rants about genetic intrusion. Yes, Lower Egyptians have a relatively high dosage of foreign ancestry, as is seen in the gene pool, however, these are from recent introductions, in the last couple of thousands of years. And on top of this, Eurasians /Asiatics (Arabs) were cold adapted and still are cold adapted.
quote:
What we can say, however, is that in the Holocene, humans from southwest Asia do not exhibit tropically adapted body shape (Crognier 1981; Eveleth and Tanner 1976; Schreider 1975).... "
---Trenton Holliday (2000) Evolution at the
Crossroads: Modern Human Emergence in Western
Asia. American Anthropologist. New Series, Vol. 102, No. 1, 54-68
Nor does the European:
quote:
In fact, in terms of body shape, the European and the Inuit samples tend to be cold-adapted and tend to be separated in multivariate space from the more tropically adapted Africans, especially those groups from south of the Sahara.
--Holliday TW, Hilton CE.
Body proportions of circumpolar peoples as evidenced from skeletal data: Ipiutak and Tigara (Point Hope) versus Kodiak Island Inuit.
But you cannot establish that all Eurasian ancestry in Lower Egypt is recent, post-Hyksos.

The rest of your post is commonplace information about body proportions relevant to climate.

Genetics are what definitively shows ancestry.

Certainly you Afronazis by now have learned (from us in here at least) that cranial and limb proportions are not reliable indicators of ancestry. They changed over time, they evolved convergently... they don't answer our questions.

Certainly someone has analyzed the DNA of predynastic Lower Egypt. Doesn't have to be 30,000 years old, since you Afronazi cultists are claiming there were no Eurasians there until the Hyksos...

LOL!

“Try harder :)”

Level 8

Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

#1496 Jun 23, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Oh...that's just 'barros' being a troll. He can't "create" or bring linked data to the table, but he can sit back, put down & "troll down" ......everybody elses efforts.
Yeah..I see he has resorted to trolling since no sources/informations agrees with his silly nonsense, that's why he can't post non.

Also wheres Curious Me btw? I haven't seen that Eurofck since I debunked him BADLY. LMAO!

Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#1497 Jun 23, 2013
big mike M wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah I asked him for physical evidence for those Eurasians in the Maghreb, but he couldn't post them. LMAO!!!
You're a liar. I and others posted multiple links to real evidence for Eurasians in the Maghreb. 30,000 years old, and 12,000 years old (Taforalt) among others.

Lying Afronazi.

Still no evidence for the population of predynastic Lower Egypt? Of course... it's a syndrome with you Afronazis.

“Try harder :)”

Level 8

Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

#1498 Jun 23, 2013
Sinajuavi wrote:
<quoted text>
You're a liar. I and others posted multiple links to real evidence for Eurasians in the Maghreb. 30,000 years old, and 12,000 years old (Taforalt) among others.
Lying Afronazi.
Still no evidence for the population of predynastic Lower Egypt? Of course... it's a syndrome with you Afronazis.
No didn't stop lying and your also trolling now out of desperation. No one akes you serious mister Eurofck.

Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#1499 Jun 23, 2013
big mike M wrote:
<quoted text>

Again Lower Egypt was sparsely populated even in dynastic times d*mb@$$. I already said a million times. It was the OTHER WAY AROUND. Africans were mostly migrating out of Lower Egypt and into the Levant.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1...
Oh really? First, a Eurasian migration into the Maghreb 30,000 years ago. Then Capsians, same route. Then Neolithics.

Again, consult a map, Afronazi. To get from the Levant to the Mahgreb, you must traverse Lower Egypt.

Traffic was in both directions. But other than Natufians, when was there a significant migration from Egypt into the Levant?

There were at least 3 in prehistoric times, in the opposite directions.

Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#1500 Jun 23, 2013
big mike M wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah..I see he has resorted to trolling since no sources/informations agrees with his silly nonsense, that's why he can't post non.
Also wheres Curious Me btw? I haven't seen that Eurofck since I debunked him BADLY. LMAO!
You're lucky any of us post at all, since this thread is stalled on your failure to provide any evidence to back up your Afronazi assertions.

“Try harder :)”

Level 8

Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

#1501 Jun 23, 2013
Sinajuavi wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh really? First, a Eurasian migration into the Maghreb 30,000 years ago. Then Capsians, same route.
Um..Id*ot...The Capsians industry comes from the older Eburran industry of east Africa also called 'Kenyan Capsian'(13,000-9,000 BCE).
Sinajuavi wrote:
Then Neolithics.
Again, consult a map, Afronazi. To get from the Levant to the Mahgreb, you must traverse Lower Egypt.
Again what the fck is a map suppose to prove? Again Lower Egypt was SPARSELY populated. I already told you a million times that there was LITTLE gene flow into Lower Egypt.
Sinajuavi wrote:
Traffic was in both directions. But other than Natufians, when was there a significant migration from Egypt into the Levant?
There were at least 3 in prehistoric times, in the opposite directions.
Yet I have posted to you a million times that there was LITTLE Eurasian gene flow going into Lower Egypt. Now you backtracked from claiming Lower Egypt was Eurasian for 30k years.

“Try harder :)”

Level 8

Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

#1502 Jun 23, 2013
Sinajuavi wrote:
<quoted text>
You're lucky any of us post at all, since this thread is stalled on your failure to provide any evidence to back up your Afronazi assertions.
No its just your trolling that makes you REFUSE to acknowledge the evidence that me,Almoravid, Bigsmoke, SEXYBLKWOMEN and others had posted. Its YOU that is trolling, because you know that NO evidence agrees with you.

Again...

WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???

WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???

WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???

WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???

WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???

WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???

WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???

WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???

WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???

WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???

Again the Nazlet Khater man was the OLDEST remains found in Paleolithic(30k) Egypt and showed affinity with Africans.

'The Position of the Nazlet Khater Specimen Among Prehistoric and Modern African and Levantine Populations'
http://www.academia.edu/882847/The_Position_o...

Give it up mister Eurofck. That radiation from New Mexico is fcking with your head.
trollslayer

Hickory Hills, IL

#1504 Jun 23, 2013
Almoravid wrote:
<quoted text>
The funny thing about bubble head Barros is, he doesn't understand that there is no PHYSICAL evidence. So he/ she / it rants about genetic intrusion. Yes, Lower Egyptians have a relatively high dosage of foreign ancestry, as is seen in the gene pool, however, these are from recent introductions, in the last couple of thousands of years. And on top of this, Eurasians /Asiatics (Arabs) were cold adapted and still are cold adapted.
quote:
What we can say, however, is that in the Holocene, humans from southwest Asia do not exhibit tropically adapted body shape (Crognier 1981; Eveleth and Tanner 1976; Schreider 1975).... "
---Trenton Holliday (2000) Evolution at the
Crossroads: Modern Human Emergence in Western
Asia. American Anthropologist. New Series, Vol. 102, No. 1, 54-68
Nor does the European:
quote:
In fact, in terms of body shape, the European and the Inuit samples tend to be cold-adapted and tend to be separated in multivariate space from the more tropically adapted Africans, especially those groups from south of the Sahara.
--Holliday TW, Hilton CE.
Body proportions of circumpolar peoples as evidenced from skeletal data: Ipiutak and Tigara (Point Hope) versus Kodiak Island Inuit.

__
Sinajuavi wrote:
<quoted text>
But you cannot establish that all Eurasian ancestry in Lower Egypt is recent, post-Hyksos.
The rest of your post is commonplace information about body proportions relevant to climate.
Genetics are what definitively shows ancestry.
Certainly you Afronazis by now have learned (from us in here at least) that cranial and limb proportions are not reliable indicators of ancestry. They changed over time, they evolved convergently... they don't answer our questions.
Certainly someone has analyzed the DNA of predynastic Lower Egypt. Doesn't have to be 30,000 years old, since you Afronazi cultists are claiming there were no Eurasians there until the Hyksos...
LOL!
You try to tear down Almoravid's sources, but you have none of your own.
Almoravid

Rotterdam, Netherlands

#1505 Jun 23, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
Well #1)"euroasians" didn't migrate anywhere Africans were 1st to migrate to Europe, Asia etc. the others came later and intermixed with the original PPL.#2)Africans originally MIGRATED from SOUTH TO NORTH when we think of the Nile.
#3) Mike has all ready discounted this foolishness about NON-blacks or Africans being where near Africa. Stop casually tossing that LIE out there as if it's a fact. NO NON-Blacks were in N.Africa until much later. Mike has brought PROOF of who was is N.Africa ( blacks or Africans)...YOU have not.
Of course the culture went from South to North. If we have to go into the nitty gritty we see this in cultural pattern. From Kerma an Naqada, the predecessors to Egypt.

But even in Egypt is self throughout the dynasties you will find this pattern in culture etc... From South to North.
trollslayer

Hickory Hills, IL

#1506 Jun 23, 2013
big mike M wrote:
<quoted text>
No its just your trolling that makes you REFUSE to acknowledge the evidence that me,Almoravid, Bigsmoke, SEXYBLKWOMEN and others had posted. Its YOU that is trolling, because you know that NO evidence agrees with you.
Again...
WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???
WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???
WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???
WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???
WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???
WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???
WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???
WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???
WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???
WHERE ARE YOUR SOURCES+QUOTES BACKING UP YOUR CLAIMS???
Again the Nazlet Khater man was the OLDEST remains found in Paleolithic(30k) Egypt and showed affinity with Africans.
'The Position of the Nazlet Khater Specimen Among Prehistoric and Modern African and Levantine Populations'
http://www.academia.edu/882847/The_Position_o...
Give it up mister Eurofck. That radiation from New Mexico is fcking with your head.
\

The only time he brings SOURCES+QUOTES is when I tell posters to ignore him. You'd think a clown who fantasizes about having been a "college instructor" would always have lots pf SOURCES+QUOTES.

“Try harder :)”

Level 8

Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

#1507 Jun 23, 2013
Almoravid wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course the culture went from South to North. If we have to go into the nitty gritty we see this in cultural pattern. From Kerma an Naqada, the predecessors to Egypt.
But even in Egypt is self throughout the dynasties you will find this pattern in culture etc... From South to North.
Lol...It doesn't even matter. Have you seen the new recent Holliday study?

It said Ancient Egyptians as a WHOLE showed more Affinities with AFRICANS(even African Americans) than with Asiatics and Europeans! LMAO!
http://img109.imageshack.us/img109/261/yx58.j...

Sadly I link you the whole study, you have to download it. A guy named Truthcentric had to email it to me.

But anyways its getting worse and worse for Eurofcks since Ancient Egypt being African is becoming more and more obvious in academia. This is why Eurofcks like Barros says the Ancient Egyptians were mixed as a LAST RESORT. He now has to lie and say there were Eurasians in Lower Egypt for 30k years when NO sources agree with that ridiculous claim and I already showed the Eurofck that there was LITTLE Eurasian gene flow into Lower Egypt.

Jeff who Barros depends on even knows Ancient Egypt was an African civilization..

“Try harder :)”

Level 8

Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

#1508 Jun 23, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>\
The only time he brings SOURCES+QUOTES is when I tell posters to ignore him. You'd think a clown who fantasizes about having been a "college instructor" would always have lots pf SOURCES+QUOTES.
Like I said again TS. EVERYONE around the internet knows about Barros being an idiot, they know who he is from all the threads he use to create and can easily be found on Google....Trust me no one takes him serious. He's been doing this 2005 I believe.

ANd speaking of culture...When you type in Vinca Culture on Google my thread about Vinca is one of the FIRST to pop up! LMAO!!!:P :P
https://www.google.com/#output=search&scl...

Now more and more people will definitely know Vinca was NOT a civilization.
Almoravid

Rotterdam, Netherlands

#1510 Jun 23, 2013
big mike M wrote:
<quoted text>
Lol...It doesn't even matter. Have you seen the new recent Holliday study?
It said Ancient Egyptians as a WHOLE showed more Affinities with AFRICANS(even African Americans) than with Asiatics and Europeans! LMAO!
http://img109.imageshack.us/img109/261/yx58.j...
Sadly I link you the whole study, you have to download it. A guy named Truthcentric had to email it to me.
But anyways its getting worse and worse for Eurofcks since Ancient Egypt being African is becoming more and more obvious in academia. This is why Eurofcks like Barros says the Ancient Egyptians were mixed as a LAST RESORT. He now has to lie and say there were Eurasians in Lower Egypt for 30k years when NO sources agree with that ridiculous claim and I already showed the Eurofck that there was LITTLE Eurasian gene flow into Lower Egypt.
Jeff who Barros depends on even knows Ancient Egypt was an African civilization..
I have heard about it, I haven't read it yet.

But this is in the opening statement of the abstract.

quote:
Bivariate analyses distinguish Jebel Sahaba from European and circumpolar samples, but do not tend to segregate them from recent North or sub-Saharan African samples[...]
--T. W. Holliday* 2013
Population Affinities of the Jebel Sahaba Skeletal Sample: Limb Proportion Evidence

“Try harder :)”

Level 8

Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

#1511 Jun 23, 2013
Almoravid wrote:
<quoted text>
I have heard about it, I haven't read it yet.
But this is in the opening statement of the abstract.
quote:
Bivariate analyses distinguish Jebel Sahaba from European and circumpolar samples, but do not tend to segregate them from recent North or sub-Saharan African samples[...]
--T. W. Holliday* 2013
Population Affinities of the Jebel Sahaba Skeletal Sample: Limb Proportion Evidence
Interesting...
trollslayer

Hammond, IN

#1514 Jun 23, 2013
big mike M wrote:
<quoted text>
Lol...It doesn't even matter. Have you seen the new recent Holliday study?
It said Ancient Egyptians as a WHOLE showed more Affinities with AFRICANS(even African Americans) than with Asiatics and Europeans! LMAO!
http://img109.imageshack.us/img109/261/yx58.j...
Sadly I link you the whole study, you have to download it. A guy named Truthcentric had to email it to me.
But anyways its getting worse and worse for Eurofcks since Ancient Egypt being African is becoming more and more obvious in academia. This is why Eurofcks like Barros says the Ancient Egyptians were mixed as a LAST RESORT. He now has to lie and say there were Eurasians in Lower Egypt for 30k years when NO sources agree with that ridiculous claim and I already showed the Eurofck that there was LITTLE Eurasian gene flow into Lower Egypt.
Jeff who Barros depends on even knows Ancient Egypt was an African civilization..
Yes..this is sad news for colonial, eurocentric party. Now who can they claim...where will they go? What will they do? ba, haha, ba, haha
trollslayer

Hammond, IN

#1515 Jun 23, 2013
big mike M wrote:
<quoted text>
Like I said again TS. EVERYONE around the internet knows about Barros being an idiot, they know who he is from all the threads he use to create and can easily be found on Google....Trust me no one takes him serious. He's been doing this 2005 I believe.
ANd speaking of culture...When you type in Vinca Culture on Google my thread about Vinca is one of the FIRST to pop up! LMAO!!!:P :P
https://www.google.com/#output=search&scl...
Now more and more people will definitely know Vinca was NOT a civilization.
...well the eurocentric pundits now want to say....that "limb proxies" are different from then to now. I doubt it, but what are your thoughts?

Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#1516 Jun 23, 2013
big mike M wrote:
<quoted text>
Lol...It doesn't even matter. Have you seen the new recent Holliday study?
It said Ancient Egyptians as a WHOLE showed more Affinities with AFRICANS(even African Americans) than with Asiatics and Europeans! LMAO!
http://img109.imageshack.us/img109/261/yx58.j...
Sadly I link you the whole study, you have to download it. A guy named Truthcentric had to email it to me.
But anyways its getting worse and worse for Eurofcks since Ancient Egypt being African is becoming more and more obvious in academia. This is why Eurofcks like Barros says the Ancient Egyptians were mixed as a LAST RESORT. He now has to lie and say there were Eurasians in Lower Egypt for 30k years when NO sources agree with that ridiculous claim and I already showed the Eurofck that there was LITTLE Eurasian gene flow into Lower Egypt.
Jeff who Barros depends on even knows Ancient Egypt was an African civilization..
Egypt as a whole, lol.

All of this says nothing to its mixing.

Still no evidence about the nature of the predynastic Lower Egyptian population, Afronazi?

LOL... and it's all due to racist motive, according to you, who think that everyone thinks like you, a sociopathic racist ideologue.

LOL at pretending the argument is over whether. Egypt is African.

You are a desperate prevaricator.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
AA love & marrige continues: Dwyane Wade and G... 4 min Lisa 2
Activist: "Abortion Threatens Black America's F... (Sep '12) 7 min Brian_G 5,308
What's happened to my lovely little girl? 23 min I have a solution 5
Hey, where is everybody? The "CDC whistleblower... 28 min ric99 33
Habesha(Ethio/Eri) GIRLS HATE Habesha MEN (Aug '08) 29 min eri tig 102
Do white boys get mad at Cleveland from Family ... 32 min Observer 1
White Catholic School Girls going black, Priest... 34 min Observer 1
I don't want to marry a BLACK MAN 1 hr trace 3,296
Lol.. WW Has 8 Mix Kids wants MORE!! 1 hr Diva 361
Why do blacks claim to be the true Israelites? ... (May '11) 2 hr AUTISTIC GUY 4,739
There's A War On The Black Male 3 hr Crown 560
Michael Brown .. STRONG ARM ROBBERY ??? 4 hr Felistas 2,106
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
Ashburn Dating

more search filters

less search filters

African-American People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••