The Ancient Egyptians were black! Fin...

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#1193 Jun 9, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
refocus on Mike's info. pretend you are a educated person who reviews and analyzes all the data. here it is again below. No meltdowns. please. Just address the data:
big mike M wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh..I see you decided to ignore this post by me to you debunking that claim...-__-
http://www.topix.com/forum/afam/TF2UGEI0UJU1N ...
But I was expecting that anyways.
http://www.topix.com/forum/afam/TF2UGEI0UJU1N...
Mikey's posts establish nothing. He babbles and prevaricates like a lying racist.

OMG... just like you!

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#1194 Jun 9, 2013
dcool wrote:
<quoted text>
We're still Waiting on you To bring up some links F**l ,Where are your links Barros ??
No you're not, you lying racist Muz.

I posted the links regarding the Maghreb long ago, so did others, and you lying Afronazi sons of pigs ignored them.

You already confessed that your family owns slaves, that you are an Arab buttboy lackey enemy of Africa, so shut the F up.
trollslayer

Midlothian, IL

#1195 Jun 10, 2013
Sinajuavi wrote:
<quoted text>
Mikey's posts establish nothing. He babbles and prevaricates like a lying racist.
OMG... just like you!
http://www.topix.com/forum/afam/TF2UGEI0UJU1N

http://www.topix.com/forum/afam/TF2UGEI0UJU1N...

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#1196 Jun 10, 2013
Afronazis in disarray! This is the phase where they stop discussing anything specific at all and just spew insults and demands for "links"... LOL!!!

Who is fooled by this nonsense? Only dropouts with a bigoted predisposition.

“Try harder :)”

Level 8

Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

#1197 Jun 10, 2013
Sinajuavi wrote:
<quoted text>
Moron. How quickly you forget your posting data on Tunisian DNA from human remains, the article clearly stating that African DNA showed up 20,000 years ago, and then you claiming that it was the oldest DNA in the Maghreb, when Eurasian DNA was there 30,000 years ago! LOL!!! That was the most comical example of your lying crap, you racist turd.
Your evasive prattling is designed to defect from the many points on which your case has been demolished.
The Maghreb has been predominantly Eurasian for 30,000 years... your failure to even address the evidence confirming this is another clear indication of your status as a racist cultish dropout.
Stop going off topic and derailing from the original argument at hand. Your post has NOTHING to do with my post... You still haven't addressed this post by me to you.
http://www.topix.com/forum/afam/TF2UGEI0UJU1N...

Again were talking about the Ancient Egyptians and NOT the Maghreb. I already addressed the Maghreb in Bakari's thread and you and Curious ME ran from it.

Again I and others ASKED you to prove Eurasians in Lower Egypt during prehistoric times and you have not done so. Again stop running away from the original argument and replacing it with a different one to save face.

“Try harder :)”

Level 8

Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

#1198 Jun 10, 2013
Sinajuavi wrote:
<quoted text>
Mikey's posts establish nothing. He babbles and prevaricates like a lying racist.
OMG... just like you!
Again PROVE IT! I asked you to. You haven't even addressed anything in my post. You haven't even explained how I am a racist and lying. Now you're trying to switch to another argument to save face.

Seriously this just PROVES you lost. Again me and dcool asked for Eurasians in lower Egyot during pre-dynastic times. YOU have not done so. Again this proves you lost because all you're doing is going off topic and calling everyone racist. What the heck is that suppose to prove? Calling Mikey a racist is not going to make your points stronger.

Again this proves you lost already, you have no argument and can only call people racist.

“Try harder :)”

Level 8

Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

#1199 Jun 10, 2013
Sinajuavi wrote:
Afronazis in disarray! This is the phase where they stop discussing anything specific at all and just spew insults and demands for "links"... LOL!!!
Who is fooled by this nonsense? Only dropouts with a bigoted predisposition.
Again you lost. STFU and stop wasting our time. You're not even addressing anyones points anymore, but just whining as usual.

Seriously I think sometimes you're mentally ret*rded and I'm not even joking at all.
trollslayer

Thornton, IL

#1200 Jun 11, 2013
...well what's happening, what has happened is when certain PPL. don't wanna deal with disagreements they'll throw up the "vail" of "afronazi" or "afrocentric".....wh en they do not want to review evidence that differs from theirs. It's like ....I don't wanna review Mike's info. he's a "afronazi".

Then they sit back and think..."that'll teach 'em.
"Disagree with me and call ya' a "afronazi".

Like I said b4....."afrocentric" is the new
term for "black militant". Disagree with "estabishment" and ur a "black militant" or "afrocentric" . Back in the 40's when a black would disagree with racist practices they were branded " race men". It's the same shyt ....different day.

These labels are "cloaks" for both denial & covert racism.

“Try harder :)”

Level 8

Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

#1201 Jun 11, 2013
No offense TS good point and everything, but what was the point of you bumping this thread when everything was settled and the argument was over?
Anonymous

Milwaukee, WI

#1202 Jun 11, 2013
Simon Legree 12 wrote:
<quoted text>
Then who cares about your stupid "opinion".
WE HAVE THE MUMMIFIED REMAINS OF THESE ANCIENT PEOPLE. THEY AIN'T NEGROES!
THOSE MUMMIES ARE FAKE. the real black Egyptian negro mummies were eaten up by the white elitists. serious folks. I am Egyptian by birth and blood with very dark brown skin tone.
I look like any typical black American, very proud too. Me and my black egyptian family are living proof they were black.
trollslayer

Thornton, IL

#1203 Jun 12, 2013
big mike M wrote:
No offense TS good point and everything, but what was the point of you bumping this thread when everything was settled and the argument was over?
....cuz the "bug" wasn't totally crushed yet, he keeps resurfacing....he might need incineration.....lol

Sinajuavi wrote:
<quoted text>
Mikey's posts establish nothing. He babbles and prevaricates like a lying racist.
OMG... just like you!

“Try harder :)”

Level 8

Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

#1204 Jun 12, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
....cuz the "bug" wasn't totally crushed yet, he keeps resurfacing....he might need incineration.....lol
Sinajuavi wrote:
<quoted text>
Mikey's posts establish nothing. He babbles and prevaricates like a lying racist.
OMG... just like you!
TS...buddy...Its okay.:) Everything's settled. Barros got the message and left this thread. He couldn't prove that Lower Egypt was inhabitanted by Eurasians pre-dynastic times.

I do not feel like arguing with Barros to be quite frankly. Because not only is it worthless but also annoying. Barros argues solely on his opinions and ignores evidence posted/doesnt address points directly. All he's going to do is repeat the same things while not even addressing my points.

He does this all the time with many people. Him throwing a hissy fit, calling me a racist and not even addressing my major points just shows he lost. And that's good enough for me.

To be honest this thread already served its purpose and everyone got the memo. Let die...

Barros left and so has Curious Me(who we haven't seen in a long time) and 'Afrocentric Exposer'. All who I destroyed in debates.

Again I do not feel like repeating my points over and over again which I know is not going to even be addressed. So again let this thread die, it served its purpose.

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#1205 Jun 12, 2013
Lying fart. You argue with yourself and proclaim yourself the winner, LOL!!!

I thought this thread was dead, since you Afronazis have nothing to say.

Wasn't it Mikey himself who posted that link showing 60% African ancestry in Lower Egypt? LOL!!! And from where was the other 40%... and those were old remains, not the current population.

Obviously since Eurasians were in the Maghreb 30,000 years ago, they'd passed through Lower Egypt, and some had settled there.

Just ask yourself this, cultboys: Given the number of depictions of Egyptians showing Eurasian types BEFORE the arrival of any foreign conquerors... obviously Eurasians were part of Egypt for a long time.

You have destroyed nobody, Mikey. You prevaricate like an Afronazi must...

Face it, most “Moors” in Spain were non-black Berbers.

And the Olmec were from Soconusco.

And the Dravidians weren't Africans.

And China wasn't created by black people.

And the Choctaw weren't black.

And Egypt was not 100% black even in predynastic times.
trollslayer

Lansing, IL

#1206 Jun 12, 2013
Sinajuavi wrote:
Lying fart. You argue with yourself and proclaim yourself the winner, LOL!!!
I thought this thread was dead, since you Afronazis have nothing to say.
Wasn't it Mikey himself who posted that link showing 60% African ancestry in Lower Egypt? LOL!!! And from where was the other 40%... and those were old remains, not the current population.
Obviously since Eurasians were in the Maghreb 30,000 years ago, they'd passed through Lower Egypt, and some had settled there.
Just ask yourself this, cultboys: Given the number of depictions of Egyptians showing Eurasian types BEFORE the arrival of any foreign conquerors... obviously Eurasians were part of Egypt for a long time.
You have destroyed nobody, Mikey. You prevaricate like an Afronazi must...
Face it, most “Moors” in Spain were non-black Berbers.
And the Olmec were from Soconusco.
And the Dravidians weren't Africans.
And China wasn't created by black people.
And the Choctaw weren't black.
And Egypt was not 100% black even in predynastic times.
Your opinions are irrelevant. I've posted evidence you haven't addressed and recently Mike has posted evidence that you have not addressed. Using the "Afronazi cloak" will no longer admonish you from addressing one's information.

Bottom line.....

When you DO NOT POST LINKED evidence and continue spouting erroneous opinions.....you are ....trolling. STOP TROLLING and follow the set rules. POST LINKED evidence

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#1207 Jun 12, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
Your opinions are irrelevant. I've posted evidence you haven't addressed and recently Mike has posted evidence that you have not addressed. Using the "Afronazi cloak" will no longer admonish you from addressing one's information.
Bottom line.....
When you DO NOT POST LINKED evidence and continue spouting erroneous opinions.....you are ....trolling. STOP TROLLING and follow the set rules. POST LINKED evidence
I've seen you fools post nothing lately but links to other Topix posts. Bore me.

Do you even know what you're arguing at the moment? Is this about was Egypt 100% black?

LOL... your own data already lost you that argument, moron. The MAJORITY but not total population of Lower Egypt was African... and so the rest were Mideast-derived Eurasians. Just like the people of the Maghreb for 30,000 years! So it is no surprise at all.

Nor is your consistent prevarication, Afronazi.

“Try harder :)”

Level 8

Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

#1208 Jun 12, 2013
Sinajuavi wrote:
Lying fart. You argue with yourself and proclaim yourself the winner, LOL!!!
Because I AM THE WINNER, you have not as of yet brought an argument has addressed/countered this post by me.
http://www.topix.com/forum/afam/TF2UGEI0UJU1N...
Sinajuavi wrote:
I thought this thread was dead, since you Afronazis have nothing to say.
LOL...Yeah right...You obviously ran from this thread since you could't even make an argument to counter mines. I have nothing to say....? Yet I've WAITING for you to post sources+quotes saying there was a significant amount of Eurasians in the Lower Egypt pre-dynastic times. When the irony is that it was the COMPLETE OPPOSITE!
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1...

Calling me an Afronazi is not going to save yourself, it only makes you look more and more like an desperate Eurocentric, which you are in fact. I'm not desperate I know I have my argument back up with FACTS+EVIDENCE! Again post sources+quotes which states Lower Egypt was significantly populated by Eurasians pre dynastic times. Get with the program old man...Your losing it.
Sinajuavi wrote:
Wasn't it Mikey himself who posted that link showing 60% African ancestry in Lower Egypt? LOL!!! And from where was the other 40%... and those were old remains, not the current population.
Look at ya...Twisting my words as usual. That study I posted was of MODERN EGYPTIANS!!! NOT the Ancients....Here is it again.
http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/6048/ychro...
^^^That's just talking about their Y-DNA...Of course Lower Egypt would be heavily mixed since ALMOST ALL invasions took place in Lower Egypt.
Sinajuavi wrote:
Obviously since Eurasians were in the Maghreb 30,000 years ago, they'd passed through Lower Egypt, and some had settled there.
1. We are NOT talking about the Maghreb, I already been over that. But feel free to get destroyed on that topic another time. BUT FOR NOW WE ARE DISCUSSING EGYPT!
2. If they settled their then were he h3ll are the Eurasians clades that were associated with those Eurasians? U6 is not even found in Egypt AT ALL....What are you even talking about man....
Sinajuavi wrote:
Just ask yourself this, cultboys: Given the number of depictions of Egyptians showing Eurasian types BEFORE the arrival of any foreign conquerors... obviously Eurasians were part of Egypt for a long time.
Proof?
Sinajuavi wrote:
You have destroyed nobody, Mikey. You prevaricate like an Afronazi must...
Uh...Yeah I did since you have no argument, keep going off topic and can't even source=quote Lower Egypt being significantly populated by Eurasians pre-dynastic. So yeah that alone proves I 'destroyed' someone and that is you.
Sinajuavi wrote:
Face it, most “Moors” in Spain were non-black Berbers.
And the Olmec were from Soconusco.
And the Dravidians weren't Africans.
And China wasn't created by black people.
And the Choctaw weren't black.
And Egypt was not 100% black even in predynastic times.
LMAO!!! Look at you going off topic and putting words in my mouth. Again that only not proves you already lost but also desperate and trying for an pathetic attempt at character assassination. Fool...Are you trying to insult my intelligence? Are you trying to insult an 27 year old intelligence who graduated college and is a parent??? Fool that's not only to work on me not only former, because me myself is PART southern Indian MYSELF!!! No shict the Dravidian's are not African, because I am part southern Indian MYSELF. These are MY people.


If you're going to try for an character assassination try a better job at it okay...

“Try harder :)”

Level 8

Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

#1209 Jun 12, 2013
Like seriously...Did this fool like really put words in my mouth saying I think the Dravidian's were African??? Doesn't the fool remember me debating against those Afrocentrics who said the Dravidian were African??? Seriously I'm more related to the Dravidians than he will ever be.

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#1210 Jun 12, 2013
big mike M wrote:
<quoted text>
Because I AM THE WINNER, you have not as of yet brought an argument has addressed/countered this post by me.
http://www.topix.com/forum/afam/TF2UGEI0UJU1N...
<quoted text>
LOL...Yeah right...You obviously ran from this thread since you could't even make an argument to counter mines. I have nothing to say....? Yet I've WAITING for you to post sources+quotes saying there was a significant amount of Eurasians in the Lower Egypt pre-dynastic times. When the irony is that it was the COMPLETE OPPOSITE!
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1...
Calling me an Afronazi is not going to save yourself, it only makes you look more and more like an desperate Eurocentric, which you are in fact. I'm not desperate I know I have my argument back up with FACTS+EVIDENCE! Again post sources+quotes which states Lower Egypt was significantly populated by Eurasians pre dynastic times. Get with the program old man...Your losing it.
<quoted text>
Look at ya...Twisting my words as usual. That study I posted was of MODERN EGYPTIANS!!! NOT the Ancients....Here is it again.
http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/6048/ychro...
^^^That's just talking about their Y-DNA...Of course Lower Egypt would be heavily mixed since ALMOST ALL invasions took place in Lower Egypt.
<quoted text>
1. We are NOT talking about the Maghreb, I already been over that. But feel free to get destroyed on that topic another time. BUT FOR NOW WE ARE DISCUSSING EGYPT!
2. If they settled their then were he h3ll are the Eurasians clades that were associated with those Eurasians? U6 is not even found in Egypt AT ALL....What are you even talking about man....
<quoted text>
Proof?
<quoted text>
Uh...Yeah I did since you have no argument, keep going off topic and can't even source=quote Lower Egypt being significantly populated by Eurasians pre-dynastic. So yeah that alone proves I 'destroyed' someone and that is you.
<quoted text>
LMAO!!! Look at you going off topic and putting words in my mouth. Again that only not proves you already lost but also desperate and trying for an pathetic attempt at character assassination. Fool...Are you trying to insult my intelligence? Are you trying to insult an 27 year old intelligence who graduated college and is a parent??? Fool that's not only to work on me not only former, because me myself is PART southern Indian MYSELF!!! No shict the Dravidian's are not African, because I am part southern Indian MYSELF. These are MY people.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =4hF6D2q9McIXX
If you're going to try for an character assassination try a better job at it okay...
LOL... Afronazis let the thread drop then return suddenly claiming they've won. YAWN!

Moron, just as invaders in historical times would have arrived in Lower Egypt, so too would have immigrants during the past 30,000 years.

Please consult a map, Afronazi cult boy.

So... you're southern India so you're right? LOL!!!

What a racist turd you are.

You know you have no case. Why don't you find a study of early civilized Egypt or predynastic, from Lower Egypt, and see who the people were?

Of course, athough Eurasians had entered the Maghreb 30,000 years ago, there is no way they could have been in Lower Egypt, right? Good luck proving that idiotic theory, racist supremacist boy.

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#1211 Jun 12, 2013
big mike M wrote:
Like seriously...Did this fool like really put words in my mouth saying I think the Dravidian's were African??? Doesn't the fool remember me debating against those Afrocentrics who said the Dravidian were African??? Seriously I'm more related to the Dravidians than he will ever be.
You're also not an Olmec.

Nor a Khmer.

Nor a graduate.

“Try harder :)”

Level 8

Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

#1212 Jun 12, 2013
Sinajuavi wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL... Afronazis let the thread drop then return suddenly claiming they've won. YAWN!
Moron, just as invaders in historical times would have arrived in Lower Egypt, so too would have immigrants during the past 30,000 years.
Again WHERES THE EVIDENCE! WHY ISN'T U6 FOUND IN LOWER EGYPT????

Explain what Mr Euronut.
Sinajuavi wrote:
Please consult a map, Afronazi cult boy.
A map for what? Again were are your source+quotes that agree that Euraians were in Lower Egypt 30k years??? When its in fact the OPPOSITE as proof with the Nazlet Khater!!! Who you ignore ALL THE TIME.
http://www.academia.edu/882847/The_Position_o...

Lets see you get out of this...The Nazlet Khater man showed affinities with AFRICANS AGAIN AFRICANS. Not only that, but his only was not only found in Egypt but also LEVANT. You know why???

"The issue of how much Paleolithic migration from the Near East there may have been is intriguing, and the mitochondrial DNA variation may need to be reassessed as to what can be considered to be only of "Eurasian origin" because if hunters and gatherers roamed between the Saharan and supra-Saharan regions and Eurasia it might be difficult to determine exactly "where" a mutation arose.-- Keita, In Hot Pursuit of Language in Prehistory ed. John Benjamins.(2008)

Seriously you lost already now you're just playing games with me as usual. Your trying to make this void debate longer than it already should be. Where is U6 in Egypt? Kazlet man is the only remain in Egypt at 30k. And AGAIN the Ancient Egyptians ANCESTORS DO NOT GO BACK THAT FAR!!! They only go back as far as the Holocene. And you say you're a teacher.
Sinajuavi wrote:
So... you're southern India so you're right? LOL!!!
What are you talking about??? You tried to put words in my mouth saying the Dravidian's are African when me being part Tamil descent KNOWS THE DRAVIDIAN'S ARE NOT FREAKING AFRICAN! You loon!
Sinajuavi wrote:
What a racist turd you are.
You know you have no case. Why don't you find a study of early civilized Egypt or predynastic, from Lower Egypt, and see who the people were?
Of course, athough Eurasians had entered the Maghreb 30,000 years ago, there is no way they could have been in Lower Egypt, right? Good luck proving that idiotic theory, racist supremacist boy.
1. Stay on topic again, we are not discussing the Maghreb, I already crushed you multiple times on that topic. Stop trying to change topics to save face.
2. LOL!! You talk about me having not case when you can't even source+quote anything saying there were any huge Eurasian populations being in Lower Egypt before Pre-dynastic. Nada...
3. You keep ignoring what I post...Again where is U6 in Egypt? WHERE????
4. Again during pre-dynastic times it was the OPPOSITE! Africans were actually migrating OUT of Lower Egypt and into the Levant!
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1...

Get lost old man, like I said before you have NO ARGUMENT. So stop troilling me with your void and worthless OPINIONS.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
no blacks allowed in this thread 2 min Drilling for the ... 45
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min Reality Speaks 1,458,320
Will Le Pen repatriate Muslims from france? 3 min Andrew 32
the moors were black africans not arabs!!! (Jun '08) 4 min who 50,609
The reason black men desire white women 15 min Lori899 17
Why Does It Take So Many BMs To Fight 1 White, ... (Jul '15) 16 min T-BOS 492
Islam an empire of faith (Oct '12) 27 min Barros 7,991
Are black people really the real jews? (Oct '12) 3 hr Barros 1,189
More from around the web