Interesting fairy tales to attempt to explain away the evidence, but you fail.<quoted text>
"You've got to explain Eurasian DNA over the entire 30k yr period, plus the remains which are clearly of Eurasian type. That is solid evidence you Afronazis avoid."
Why have they not released the Y-dna from those remains? Ofcourse one can not rule out bunch of euroasian hunter-gatherers venturing into north africa and staying. But saying they dominated north africa, I don't buy. It is possible a couple U6 females were sold to africans are responsible for U6 in north africa. Why is african Y-dna dominant in north africa, can explain that? What happened to the euroasia male of 30k?
MtDNA and Y has been found in the Maghreb. When those Eurasians first arrived 30,000 years ago, the Mghreb was uninhabited. There were no Africans. Buying slaves! LOL!!! We're talking about the Upper Palaeolithic! Nobody was bringing slaves anywhere.
African Y-DNA entered the Maghreb 20,000 years ago.
Throughout the 30k yr period Eurasian DNA has predominated in the Maghreb.
Finds of human remains confirm this, as do depictions of Maghrebians by ancient peoples.
And even today, the part of Morocco and Algeria from which the Moors came who invaded Iberia are of Eurasian type, not black.