UNTOLD BLACK HISTORY: The Black Chinese
trollslayer

Schererville, IN

#87 Sep 3, 2013
Jeff wrote:
<quoted text>
There is NO "Black Chinese DNA". Chinese are EAST ASIAN people, genetically the Chinese cluster with other EAST ASIAN people NOT you blacks. Stop trying to steal the accomplishments, civilizations and identity of people who were never black NOR related to you Sub Saharan African ancestors.
"Sub Saharan African" is a racist term all of Africa was once BLACK. Stop trolling. I've given the posters the evidence they need Lets see what they think. Again...my evidence is IN.....now eat it.

(Prof. Li also knows the truth).
trollslayer

Schererville, IN

#88 Sep 3, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
those "eyes originated in Africa" .....so do NOT let the trolls LIE to you. They want to pretend ancient Africans never left Africa to populate the world. Don't buy it. Just use my research as a start.

Africa is the "seed of man"
Chinese

Beijing, China

#89 Sep 4, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
those "eyes originated in Africa" .....so do NOT let the trolls LIE to you. They want to pretend ancient Africans never left Africa to populate the world. Don't buy it. Just use my research as a start.
Africa is the "seed of man"
NOPE,Chinese are came from Africa 100000 years ago,since when we are become black?LOL

are y suppose to means whites,indians,and all world are blacks? who will buy your shits?
trollslayer

Schererville, IN

#90 Sep 4, 2013
Chinese wrote:
<quoted text>
NOPE,Chinese are came from Africa 100000 years ago,since when we are become black?LOL
are y suppose to means whites,indians,and all world are blacks? who will buy your shits?
we all descend from Africa.....some more DIRECT than others. Your sentence structure and grammar are HORRIFIC. Learn how to write and proofread before posting here.
trollslayer

Schererville, IN

#91 Sep 4, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
Chinese are DIRECT descendants of ancient African migrants. Case closed
Jeff

Framingham, MA

#92 Sep 4, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
"Sub Saharan African" is a racist term all of Africa was once BLACK. Stop trolling. I've given the posters the evidence they need Lets see what they think. Again...my evidence is IN.....now eat it.
(Prof. Li also knows the truth).
The term Sub Saharan African is a scientific, historical and culatralu term used by academics everywhere. YOU just dodn't like it because it exposes your lies. You don't post any evidence just more misinformation. Prof. Li never claimed the Chinese as black, he was talking about the Chinese being part of the same OOA migrations that all other humans were.
Jeff

Framingham, MA

#93 Sep 4, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
those "eyes originated in Africa" .....so do NOT let the trolls LIE to you. They want to pretend ancient Africans never left Africa to populate the world. Don't buy it. Just use my research as a start.
Africa is the "seed of man"
Those "eyes" have nothing to do with any Africans, they evolved in Asians based upon the environments Asians lived in. Now go learn about human evolution, please, where scientists state that even you black Africans don't look anything like those early homospien types since you too evolved since then.
Jeff

Framingham, MA

#94 Sep 4, 2013
Chinese wrote:
<quoted text>
NOPE,Chinese are came from Africa 100000 years ago,since when we are become black?LOL
are y suppose to means whites,indians,and all world are blacks? who will buy your shits?
Yeah Afrocentrics do mean that, delusional Afrocentrics believe that just because humans migrated out of Africa over 100,000 years ago that everyone is 'black'. Even though scientists have disputed such claims given that no people on earth today resemble those early pre-historic homospecies types since we have all evolved and continued to evolved to this day. Afrocentrics are crazy.
trollslayer

Chicago, IL

#95 Sep 4, 2013
Jeff wrote:
<quoted text>
The term Sub Saharan African is a scientific, historical and culatralu term used by academics everywhere. YOU just dodn't like it because it exposes your lies. You don't post any evidence just more misinformation. Prof. Li never claimed the Chinese as black, he was talking about the Chinese being part of the same OOA migrations that all other humans were.
They (Asians) are direct descendants of Africans.

-----

"Nigerian-born Chikia Onyeani who chairs the Celebrate Africa Group says the phrase is demeaning to Africa and should be rejected"

So do you want be racism toward a African .......Nigerian-born Chikia Onyeani. Here's what he says about the term.

http://www.google.com/url...
trollslayer

Chicago, IL

#96 Sep 4, 2013
Jeff wrote:
<quoted text>
Those "eyes" have nothing to do with any Africans, they evolved in Asians based upon the environments Asians lived in. Now go learn about human evolution, please, where scientists state that even you black Africans don't look anything like those early homospien types since you too evolved since then.
Jeff wrote:
Those "eyes" have nothing to do with any Africans,
STOP with that b.s. go read what Dr Diop says about "nature never striking twice". Epicanthal eye-folds had it's original in Africa with the some of the oldest PPL. on earth. Hell no it did pop up twice.

You are to racist to admit that Africans are the "parents for all of us". You are to racist to admit that African were the FIRST EXPLORERS & POPULATER'S ON EARTH. You are racist to admit without Africans none of us would be here.

There's no such thing as "multi-regionalism" NO...the same phenotypes do not JUST show up in various parts of the earth. They have to have a "root".

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#98 Sep 4, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
STOP with that b.s. go read what Dr Diop says about "nature never striking twice". Epicanthal eye-folds had it's original in Africa with the some of the oldest PPL. on earth. Hell no it did pop up twice.
You are to racist to admit that Africans are the "parents for all of us". You are to racist to admit that African were the FIRST EXPLORERS & POPULATER'S ON EARTH. You are racist to admit without Africans none of us would be here.
There's no such thing as "multi-regionalism" NO...the same phenotypes do not JUST show up in various parts of the earth. They have to have a "root".
Again you display your abject ignorance of evolution, Afronazi racist trollboy.

Look up CONVERGENT EVOLUTION. It means: lightning strikes twice!!! LOL!!! Precisely opposite what you assert, yet this is a basic fact about evolution, taught in highschool biology class (I've taught it there and in college).

You dimwit. Dullard. Dolt. Dunce. Dork.

Today's Africans don't represent the ancestor of the earth's various peoples. The vast majority of Africans are of modern types who've evolved considerably since the OOA's left. Even the earlier Khoisan type has been evolving over time, as all populations do on earth.

Again... you are ignorant of evolution, boy. You are nothing like the original Homo sapiens nor the later common ancestor before OOA.

And you are not a Hebrew.

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#99 Sep 4, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
They (Asians) are direct descendants of Africans.
-----
"Nigerian-born Chikia Onyeani who chairs the Celebrate Africa Group says the phrase is demeaning to Africa and should be rejected"
So do you want be racism toward a African .......Nigerian-born Chikia Onyeani. Here's what he says about the term.
http://www.google.com/url...
Everyone is a direct descendant of Africans... very ancient Upper Palaeolithic Africans, not YOU.

This is a commonplace and insisting on it you demonstrate again that you know nothing about evolution or human evolutionary history.

Afronazi liar.

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#100 Sep 4, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
They (Asians) are direct descendants of Africans.
-----
"Nigerian-born Chikia Onyeani who chairs the Celebrate Africa Group says the phrase is demeaning to Africa and should be rejected"
So do you want be racism toward a African .......Nigerian-born Chikia Onyeani. Here's what he says about the term.
http://www.google.com/url...
There is nothing racist about the term.

Submarine---under the sea.

Subarctic---south of the Arctic

subtropical---north or south of the tropics

subterranean.---beneath the earth

subsaharan---south of the Sahara

Nothing strange or untoward about the term at all.

You babbling racist dimwit.

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#101 Sep 4, 2013
Jeff wrote:
<quoted text>
Those "eyes" have nothing to do with any Africans, they evolved in Asians based upon the environments Asians lived in. Now go learn about human evolution, please, where scientists state that even you black Africans don't look anything like those early homospien types since you too evolved since then.
If the full epicanthic eye fold was present in eastern Asia among the earliest immigrants from Africa, then it would be more prevalent among Native Americans. But it is not. Native Americans have eyes which may look like SE Asians but not like Koreans or most Chinese.

Wow how can Afronazis explain that?

LOL... everything everywhere was “really black”...

ADMIT that China was created by pygmy Grimaldi Hebrew Moors!!!

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#102 Sep 4, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
those "eyes originated in Africa" .....so do NOT let the trolls LIE to you. They want to pretend ancient Africans never left Africa to populate the world. Don't buy it. Just use my research as a start.
Africa is the "seed of man"
Africa did indeed host the evolution of Homo sapiens, probably in the highlands of Ethiopia, about 200,000 years ago.

Around 70,000 years ago, a common ancestor of all humans lived, also probably in Ethiopia, from whom descended modern Africans (not including Khoisan/pygmy, who are older) and all non-Africans.

However, you are not like either of those African Homo sapiens types.

1. 70,000 years of evolution has changed W-Central Africans just as it's changed L3 African and Eurasians.
2. you are part heidelbergensis, part Eurasian and part neandertalensis as well
3. Afronazi cult silliness has warped you into the oaf you are today.

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#103 Sep 4, 2013
Jeff wrote:
<quoted text>
Those "eyes" have nothing to do with any Africans, they evolved in Asians based upon the environments Asians lived in. Now go learn about human evolution, please, where scientists state that even you black Africans don't look anything like those early homospien types since you too evolved since then.
Epicanthic eyelid apparently evolved in the north, which is all the more indication it is recent. The north is closer to the bering Strait and to America. This indicates that it evolved after Native American ancestors had already moved north of China, Mongolia or southern Siberia.

Oh poor Afronazis, wanting so bad to be pygmy Grimaldi Hebrew Moorish Chinese Olmecs!!!
trollslayer

Thornton, IL

#104 Sep 5, 2013
Sinajuavi wrote:
<quoted text>
Again you display your abject ignorance of evolution, Afronazi racist trollboy.
Look up CONVERGENT EVOLUTION. It means: lightning strikes twice!!! LOL!!! Precisely opposite what you assert, yet this is a basic fact about evolution, taught in highschool biology class (I've taught it there and in college).
You dimwit. Dullard. Dolt. Dunce. Dork.
Today's Africans don't represent the ancestor of the earth's various peoples. The vast majority of Africans are of modern types who've evolved considerably since the OOA's left. Even the earlier Khoisan type has been evolving over time, as all populations do on earth.
Again... you are ignorant of evolution, boy. You are nothing like the original Homo sapiens nor the later common ancestor before OOA.
And you are not a Hebrew.
YOU STUPID IDIOTIC.....ph'ck. CONVERGENT EVOLUTION has NOTHING to do with HUMANS. CONVERGENT EVOLUTION deals animals, fish etc. SMH

CONVERGENT EVOLUTION:
Definition

noun

A kind of evolution wherein organisms evolve structures that have similar (analogous) structures or functions in spite of their evolutionary ancestors being very dissimilar or unrelated.

Supplement

Examples are:

the wings of bats, birds, and insects evolved independently from each other but all are used to perform the function of flying
the complex eyes of vertebrates, cephalopods (squid and octopus), cubozoan jellyfish, and arthropods (insects, spiders, crustaceans) evolved separately, but all perform the function of vision
the smelling organs of the terrestrial coconut crab are similar to those of insects
the very similar shells of brachiopods and bivalve molluscs
prickles, thorns and spines have evolved independently to prevent or limit herbivory
plant hormones such as gibberellin and abscisic acid of plants and fungi

____

FACT remains all of us have a basis that began in Africa with original man. Africa is the root. NO there's no such the as "multi-regional" phenotypes. Or the same phenotypes "poping up twice. AND THERE IS NO SCHOLAR that backs up that foolishness. IF SO .....LINK IT, lets analyze it. otherwise CASE CLOSED.
Jeff

Framingham, MA

#105 Sep 6, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
YOU STUPID IDIOTIC.....ph'ck. CONVERGENT EVOLUTION has NOTHING to do with HUMANS. CONVERGENT EVOLUTION deals animals, fish etc. SMH
CONVERGENT EVOLUTION:
as gibberellin and abscisic acid of plants and fungi
____
FACT remains all of us have a basis that began in Africa with original man. Africa is the root. NO there's no such the as "multi-regional" phenotypes. Or the same phenotypes "poping up twice. AND THERE IS NO SCHOLAR that backs up that foolishness. IF SO .....LINK IT, lets analyze it. otherwise CASE CLOSED.
You really lack any understanding of evolution. Convergent evolution in humans has been documented by scientists already, dingleberry.
http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi...
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#106 Sep 6, 2013
Stoptheinsane wrote:
The First Chinese were Black
http://www.trinicenter.com/FirstChinese.htm
nope the first Chinese were neanderthals!
trollslayer

Chicago, IL

#107 Sep 6, 2013
Jeff wrote:
<quoted text>
You really lack any understanding of evolution. Convergent evolution in humans has been documented by scientists already, dingleberry.
http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi...
this is taking about mutations ( humans have mutated away from Africans). It has nothing to do with phenotypes appearing or popping up twice in humans. It doesn't happen. We all come from a "root" phenotype.

_______

" The monogenetic view states that there is one source for mankind; man was born in one place and became different due to the climatic conditions to which he was exposed. The polygenetic opinion claims that man has several locations of origin, which would explain the physiological differences between the races.

Followers of this theory believe that man was born in Africa, Europe, and Asia and there was no evolutionary or climatic development.

Diop states that there are two reasons why this theory is faulty. He says that nature never strikes twice in its evolution; she doesn't create the same being twice. In addition, complete fossils have been found on the African continents, which proves that life began there. No such fossils have been found anywhere else in the world.

In 1912, a British geologist attempted to prove that life had begun in England by piecing together a fake fossil supposedly found on British soil. The fabricated skull was later found to have been a fake by an English anthropologist in the 1950's. It was determined to have been constructed using the mandible and canine teeth of a monkey.

Diop reinforces his belief in the monogenetic theory by saying "If Africans never left Africa, the rest of the world would be an unpeopled desert."
_____

Dr. Diop is a respected, objective African scholar. If you have a problem with him, then it shows ur a racist against African scholarship.
___

Dr. Diop.........
An Egyptologist and linguist, he had the revolutionary idea to use the scientific method to disprove the many myths surrounding ancient Kemet. He developed a way to test the levels of melanin in Egyptian mummies, which revealed that the ancient Egyptians were, indeed, Africans

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
What music are you listening to right now? (Sep '08) 5 min freddie47 35,278
the moors were black africans not arabs!!! (Jun '08) 8 min Real 49,042
Trans-Atlantic slave trade myth? You decide! (May '13) 18 min Drilling for the ... 89
Poll Will Donald Trump be the next President of the ... (Aug '15) 20 min DerekJ 1,734
You scared dopy ?? 28 min Dying Old Bat 2016 9
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 29 min sonicfilter 1,433,967
Le PAPYRUS de KAMARA (Nov '15) 42 min dcool 1,241
A Serious Question For Blacks 43 min White and Waking 33
Another brother shot 48 min dcool 66
Why did they Nuked Japan but not Germany??? 57 min dcool 325
IR at the walmart 1 hr Dan Snow 96
More from around the web