Race in America: Why are blacks being...

Race in America: Why are blacks being seen as racists?

There are 9913 comments on the Washington Times story from Jul 8, 2013, titled Race in America: Why are blacks being seen as racists?. In it, Washington Times reports that:

WASHINGTON , July 8, 2013 - Last week's Rasmussen poll revealed some surprising and disturbing information about the way Americans think about race in America.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Washington Times.

xxxrayted

Brook Park, OH

#9724 Dec 21, 2013
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>Very True, the Democrats of today are going about a different way since the Democrats are the ones that lost the Civil War and were more less forced to go about it a different way which today it is Economical Slavery and the majority of blacks are for it & prefer it too.
Of course it is. As I've said repeatedly, the more government dependents, the more likely Democrat voters. The problem is that there are so few blacks that even care about politics and policy to realize it. When you drive through black areas, you don't hear political talk on the radios in their cars. You don't hear them discussing political issues at work either.

Ask any black man about political parties, and in most cases, they will say Republicans are for the wealthy and Democrats are for the poor and working. That's all they know because it's all they've been told. As long as Democrats can keep them that politically ignorant, they have a strong voting base for life.

Level 1

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#9725 Dec 21, 2013
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course it is. As I've said repeatedly, the more government dependents, the more likely Democrat voters. The problem is that there are so few blacks that even care about politics and policy to realize it. When you drive through black areas, you don't hear political talk on the radios in their cars. You don't hear them discussing political issues at work either.
Ask any black man about political parties, and in most cases, they will say Republicans are for the wealthy and Democrats are for the poor and working. That's all they know because it's all they've been told. As long as Democrats can keep them that politically ignorant, they have a strong voting base for life.
What you say is so true.
Bannedagain4

Miami, FL

#9727 Dec 22, 2013
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>Very True, the Democrats of today are going about a different way since the Democrats are the ones that lost the Civil War and were more less forced to go about it a different way which today it is Economical Slavery and the majority of blacks are for it & prefer it too.
Welfare has always been a way to control the blacks and lazy whites . Keeping them from rioting and destroying our way of life.. Why is it that black people are the only people in the US who burn their own neighborhoods?
xxxrayted

Brook Park, OH

#9728 Dec 22, 2013
Bannedagain4 wrote:
<quoted text> Welfare has always been a way to control the blacks and lazy whites . Keeping them from rioting and destroying our way of life.. Why is it that black people are the only people in the US who burn their own neighborhoods?
I guess for the same reason why they are the only race in the world (with exception of those with territorial or religious issues) that strive to move away from their own kind.
Bannedagain4

Cambridge, MA

#9729 Dec 22, 2013
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
I guess for the same reason why they are the only race in the world (with exception of those with territorial or religious issues) that strive to move away from their own kind.
I agree However, the problem is that they are like locusts destroying everything in their path. Neighborhoods that were once very nice have turned to blight, because of blacks moving into them . The way I see it is that only the affluent gated communities have stood up against the ghetto blacks destroying them . Simply because sec 8 doesn't cover million dollar homes. Plus advertising is done in a fashion as to avoid blacks from participating in the sale of properties in the community . Most sales are posted inside the gates and no visible from the entrance no homes ever have for sale signs on them .

We have had this discussion before I totally give up on rental property too many headaches even if you have a management company handle them for you . In my case we moved out of the state making it impossible to keep tabs on what was happening with our properties .
xxxrayted

Brook Park, OH

#9730 Dec 22, 2013
Bannedagain4 wrote:
<quoted text> I agree However, the problem is that they are like locusts destroying everything in their path. Neighborhoods that were once very nice have turned to blight, because of blacks moving into them . The way I see it is that only the affluent gated communities have stood up against the ghetto blacks destroying them . Simply because sec 8 doesn't cover million dollar homes. Plus advertising is done in a fashion as to avoid blacks from participating in the sale of properties in the community . Most sales are posted inside the gates and no visible from the entrance no homes ever have for sale signs on them .
We have had this discussion before I totally give up on rental property too many headaches even if you have a management company handle them for you . In my case we moved out of the state making it impossible to keep tabs on what was happening with our properties .
Your comment reminds me of a black Congresswoman that made the complaint of hurricanes always being named after white people and never blacks a few years back.

I actually agreed with her. In fact, I said that all hurricanes should be named after blacks because hurricanes have more in common with blacks

They move in unwanted, they destroy everything in sight, they hurt and kill people, and then move on to do the same thing to other areas.
Bannedagain4

Miami, FL

#9731 Dec 22, 2013
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Your comment reminds me of a black Congresswoman that made the complaint of hurricanes always being named after white people and never blacks a few years back.
I actually agreed with her. In fact, I said that all hurricanes should be named after blacks because hurricanes have more in common with blacks
They move in unwanted, they destroy everything in sight, they hurt and kill people, and then move on to do the same thing to other areas.
I think it is in their nature to whine. If hurricanes were only named for blacks they would be racist ,of course. I do like you analogy it is true. that or locusts

Level 1

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#9732 Dec 22, 2013
Bannedagain4 wrote:
<quoted text> Welfare has always been a way to control the blacks and lazy whites . Keeping them from rioting and destroying our way of life.. Why is it that black people are the only people in the US who burn their own neighborhoods?
That is the problem and is the Liberal way & appoach of handling them which welfare should be taken completely away and then if they want to act like a bunch wild savages like the Indian's were years ago which is no different then go out and start slaughtering them if they want to act like a bunch of savages and wild animals because in the long run it will be cheaper and more effective Socially and Economically for sure here in the US because the US cant afford to borrow to keep them on Welfare.
xxxrayted

Brook Park, OH

#9733 Dec 22, 2013
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>That is the problem and is the Liberal way & appoach of handling them which welfare should be taken completely away and then if they want to act like a bunch wild savages like the Indian's were years ago which is no different then go out and start slaughtering them if they want to act like a bunch of savages and wild animals because in the long run it will be cheaper and more effective Socially and Economically for sure here in the US because the US cant afford to borrow to keep them on Welfare.
I would disagree only for the fact we did it in the past. We didn't take all the welfare away, but took some.

After Gingrich forced Clinton to sign Welfare Reform, all the libs swore it would lead to national mayhem. That didn't happen. In fact, quite the opposite took place. Many got jobs--some for the first time in their life. The people who were interviewed said they felt liberated and not enslaved. They finally had a place in society and more black men stayed with their family instead of leaving the woman and children to screw around with somebody else. It worked.

Tough love works nearly every time it's tried. I think we would all be surprised if some people in our government actually had the guts to do it.

Level 1

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#9734 Dec 22, 2013
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
I would disagree only for the fact we did it in the past. We didn't take all the welfare away, but took some.
After Gingrich forced Clinton to sign Welfare Reform, all the libs swore it would lead to national mayhem. That didn't happen. In fact, quite the opposite took place. Many got jobs--some for the first time in their life. The people who were interviewed said they felt liberated and not enslaved. They finally had a place in society and more black men stayed with their family instead of leaving the woman and children to screw around with somebody else. It worked.
Tough love works nearly every time it's tried. I think we would all be surprised if some people in our government actually had the guts to do it.
that is why we need to eliminate Social Security for one where the liberal BS all started as the government being a provider and if these liberals have put themselves in the position of depending on it too bad it is just Tough love.

Since: Jul 10

Minneapolis, MN

#9735 Dec 22, 2013
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>that is why we need to eliminate Social Security for one where the liberal BS all started as the government being a provider and if these liberals have put themselves in the position of depending on it too bad it is just Tough love.
Social Security was started as a govt scam program. Back when folks normally died in their 40s and 50s. very few lived to 62 back then.
.
The govt started it as a way of getting extra cash into the govt. Back then, the ones in the govt didn't expect folks to start to have as long of a life as many folks today have.
.
Also, back then, wives were not covered under the program. Once the man died, if the woman hadn't worked recently, she would be destitute. But that was when it was expected that a elderly woman went to live with family to be supported by a son or daughter's husband.

Level 1

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#9736 Dec 22, 2013
Sangelia wrote:
<quoted text>
Social Security was started as a govt scam program. Back when folks normally died in their 40s and 50s. very few lived to 62 back then.
.
The govt started it as a way of getting extra cash into the govt. Back then, the ones in the govt didn't expect folks to start to have as long of a life as many folks today have.
.
Also, back then, wives were not covered under the program. Once the man died, if the woman hadn't worked recently, she would be destitute. But that was when it was expected that a elderly woman went to live with family to be supported by a son or daughter's husband.
Exactly Social Security was a Government Scam Program from the start to begin with and your also right about people dying in their 40's and 50's because I one day look at the US Census Data Records which confirmed that back then that a good majority of folks died in their 40's and 50's and never lived to the age of 65 which proved that the Social Security program was never to benefit the citizens of the US but the US Federal Government only.
xxxrayted

Brook Park, OH

#9739 Dec 22, 2013
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>that is why we need to eliminate Social Security for one where the liberal BS all started as the government being a provider and if these liberals have put themselves in the position of depending on it too bad it is just Tough love.
The problem is there is no feasible way to end SS.

People relied on that money being there when they retired and many are dependent on SS alone. They have nothing else.

Other people--particularly us baby boomers don't want to end it either as we are approaching our payday and retirement. They too were promised that the SS money they paid in will be paid back to them at the age of 65, and they want it.

Younger people might go for getting rid of it since they didn't pay into the programs as deeply as the elderly. The problem with that is they have parents or grandparents who do depend on SS or soon will, and they will not support getting rid of it.

The problems we have with SS is the same problems we will have with Commie Care unless we can get rid of it next presidential election. Once you make people dependent on a government program, it's almost impossible to get rid of.
xxxrayted

Brook Park, OH

#9740 Dec 22, 2013
Sangelia wrote:
<quoted text>
Social Security was started as a govt scam program. Back when folks normally died in their 40s and 50s. very few lived to 62 back then.
That's why some are saying the solution is to extend the age you can collect.

Fine in theory, but it's usually the suit and ties on television and radio making that suggestion.

Do you think a roofer can climb up and down those ladders and walk on a slanted roof all day at the age of 68? How about a bricklayer? Most construction workers can barely make it to the retirement age we have now. What about a garbage collector? Think he can lift those cans and empty them out into the truck all day long at the age of 67? I'll even use my own profession. Do you want to be in front of my truck on a snowy day on the highway when we have to suddenly hit our brakes and I'm carrying 50,000 lbs of freight at 70 years old?

There are just some things that can't be done at a later age for many workers. Great solution if we all had jobs sitting behind a desk all day, but extending the age one can collect doesn't work for everybody---at least not safely.

“Sombrero Galaxy”

Level 8

Since: Jan 10

I'm An Illegal Alien

#9741 Dec 23, 2013
No Comment wrote:
<quoted text>
You're either a liar, or an idiot.
"In some cities, unemployment for black working-age males is more than 50 percent."
http://townhall.com/columnists/walterewilliam...
...factor in your "disproportionate incarceration", and anyone who can tie their own shoes wouldn't make the mistake (or tell the lie) you did.
The key phrase is "in some cities" meaning not the majority of cities, retard.

“Sombrero Galaxy”

Level 8

Since: Jan 10

I'm An Illegal Alien

#9742 Dec 23, 2013
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Most blacks are not criminals either, but that doesn't mean the ones who are criminals are not hurting the black community. It's a problem and something that contributes to the demise of blacks as a whole.
This is the one thing that you've said that I agree with.

“Sombrero Galaxy”

Level 8

Since: Jan 10

I'm An Illegal Alien

#9743 Dec 23, 2013
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
r.
Ask any black man about political parties, and in most cases, they will say Republicans are for the wealthy and Democrats are for the poor and working. That's all they know because it's all they've been told.
That is totally correct. Republicans are for the rich. Just look how quick republicans went for defending BP during the oil spill. Or how reps dragged us into the Iraqi war just for big oil.
xxxrayted

Brook Park, OH

#9744 Dec 23, 2013
emperorjohn wrote:
<quoted text>
That is totally correct. Republicans are for the rich. Just look how quick republicans went for defending BP during the oil spill. Or how reps dragged us into the Iraqi war just for big oil.
Big oil? Where is that big oil? How much oil do we get from Iraq today? How much did we get during the war?

Yes, Republicans were defending BP, but DumBama had the upper hand. So what was the result of his actions?

The oil rigs moved out. Thousands of jobs were lost not only with oil drilling, but by the businesses that took care of these people such as hotels, bars, restaurants and so on. A court even had to threaten DumBama to reopen the Gulf which was much too late.

Republicans defend industry (you know, the people that create our jobs) and Democrats attack industry. And let me tell you, DumBama is the most anti-business President I've ever seen in my lifetime. Then people on your side can't figure out why are so-called recovery is barely noticeable.

Obama biggest recipient of BP cash
By ERIKA LOVLEY | 5/5/10 5:05 AM EDT Updated: 4/3/12 4:27 PM EDT

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0510/367...
Bannedagain4

Miami, FL

#9745 Dec 23, 2013
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>That is the problem and is the Liberal way & appoach of handling them which welfare should be taken completely away and then if they want to act like a bunch wild savages like the Indian's were years ago which is no different then go out and start slaughtering them if they want to act like a bunch of savages and wild animals because in the long run it will be cheaper and more effective Socially and Economically for sure here in the US because the US cant afford to borrow to keep them on Welfare.
Remember when they proposed drug testing for welfare recipients? All the libs and black organizations were up on arms over it . If you and I have to be subjected to random drug testing to keep out jobs , why is it wrong to deny welfare to those that are on welfare and stoned

Supporting people from cradle to grave has become an entitlement mentality that blacks have come to depend on for their existence Why work when you can have a brood of sprogs that allow you get the government to pay you for your entire life?
This needs to end now even if a few of them die off in the process. Not only are you paying for them to live we are paying them to get bullet holes patched up in the ER at an average cost of 56K per gunshot victim
Bannedagain4

Miami, FL

#9746 Dec 23, 2013
emperorjohn wrote:
<quoted text>
This is the one thing that you've said that I agree with.
25 % of blacks have a record and /or spent jail time by age 25 Don't get all excite d he was being generous wen eh said most 17 % is most , but 25 % compared to 2% of whites is a lot

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Famous black movie lines? 1 min Yisraelite Suprem... 7
Poll Why Do Outlaw Biker Gangs Allow Hispanics To Jo... (Feb '11) 2 min Hunk 266
News Latinos and Whiteness 5 min Johnny 30
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 6 min VetnorsGate 1,620,318
OOPS! Pre-Human remains found in GERMANY! 6 min Factsmatter 33
9.7 million yo hominid teeth found in Germany 9 min Yisraelite Suprem... 11
Can America Become 80% White Again? 14 min Knoxxie 208
I need proof that the Ancient Egyptians Were No... (Oct '07) 18 min Deanna 35,342
Do black men really have larger penises? (Sep '10) 35 min nope 1,578
Black people leech off of white people 2 hr Redefined 140
More from around the web