Race in America: Why are blacks being...

Race in America: Why are blacks being seen as racists?

There are 9913 comments on the Washington Times story from Jul 8, 2013, titled Race in America: Why are blacks being seen as racists?. In it, Washington Times reports that:

WASHINGTON , July 8, 2013 - Last week's Rasmussen poll revealed some surprising and disturbing information about the way Americans think about race in America.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Washington Times.

“Antisocialistic”

Level 2

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#659 Jul 18, 2013
Ink_knight wrote:
<quoted text>You're the only one who looks to be complaining to me. Its what sniveling weak Afrocentric ignorant blacks do best.

Oreos are yummy by the way, so are crackers- especially with clam chowder mmmm nom nom... I'm an American, who happens to be black. I'm proud of who I am- and I gotta say pretty damn happy with my life... Although I do wish I were a bit taller.

All you're doing is basically telling me, that blacks cannot be their own person, or think for themselves. Its ok for white people to call out whites who are bad, and ignorant... But its not ok for blacks to call out blacks who are bad and ignorant... Get it together lol.
http://youtu.be/n_YQ8560E1w

Level 8

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#660 Jul 18, 2013
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
<quoted text>
Police DID NOT tell Zimmerman not to following someone.
The police specifically told that phagg not to follow Treyvon.
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
<quoted text>Repeating your propaganda is not going to change facts. A dispatcher told Zimmerman,"we don't need you to do that". As hard as you try, you can never turn that into police telling him not to follow someone. Besides, prove Zimmerman didn't start heading back to his truck at that point. Oh, that's right, the prosecution couldn't prove that either.
Bytch, I do not have to "prove" anything. I hope someone kills that bastard. And all of you racist dogs need to lay off my people.
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
<quoted text>Oh, so you want the legal system to punish him, but you do not want to use the legal definitions used to construct and enforce the laws you CLAIM he broke. That makes perfect liberal sense.
That is priceless! A man that was found NOT GUILTY, was indisputably breaking the law, in your mind. That explains sooooooo much!
He was found not guilty of murder. He was guilty of stalking but he was not charged. The point is Zimmerman was in the wrong. And now the feds will prosecute him for civil rights violations. That is the correct thing to do. And that is my main point. End of discussion.
Level 1

Since: Dec 11

Morristown, NJ

#661 Jul 18, 2013
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
Ah, I've seen him on Glenn Beck's channel (waits for the crazies, to have a fit that I mentioned Glenn Beck) lol.
spocko

Oakland, CA

#662 Jul 18, 2013
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
<quoted text>
How exactly was Zimmerman supposed to KNOW Martin was likely to be unarmed? Your assertion that Zimmerman had murder in his heart and is a coward is totally unfounded, and now disproven as of the conclusion of his second degree murder trial. Your bias is showing.
"The court part is over. Justice will be had in the streets when someone kills that racist cowardly dog." How very liberal of you. Aren't liberals supposed to be "informed", "peace loving", "compassionate", "understanding", individuals? You must be their poster child.
"What the efff is it when you approach someone the street who is not doing anything against the law and start some crap? Zimerman had no right to even look at Trayvon, much less speak to him or ask him any questions. Slavery is long over, fool"
Hmmm. Zimmerman was a neighborhood watchman, patrolling a gated community. Martin fit the description of someone that had been burglarizing homes in that gated community. Zimmerman had every right to "look" at Martin. Zimmerman had every right to speak to and question Martin.
"I do not care how many times it happens to you. It had better not happen to me."
Again, how liberally understanding, and peace loving of you.
You libs describe yourselves as ambassadors of knowledge, peace, and Fairytale lives for everyone. Yet you are quick to tell off on yourselves with knee jerk posts and thought processes like this.
I wish Zimmerman and the rest of the gunloons would watch and listen to this video
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Level 1

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#663 Jul 18, 2013
Abdurratln wrote:
<quoted text>
I have a fix.
<quoted text>
Empower the poor. That is my fix. That also means a new political organization. Here, I think the Convention People's Party is the answer.( http://conventionpeoplesparty.org/ )I do not know Austrailia well enough. But an Austrailian aborigine comrade helped me to develop this new theory and slogan
that is what the thinking of the 1960's was about empowering the poor with the Pseudo Liberals Democrat's & LBJ's Great Society which is and was total failure and Chicago Illinois is proof of that and EW Jackson is telling the truth.

Great Society

The War on Poverty began with a $1 billion appropriation in 1964 and spent another $2 billion in the following two years. It spawned dozens of programs, among them the Job Corps, whose purpose was to help disadvantaged youth develop marketable skills; the Neighborhood Youth Corps, established to give poor urban youths work experience and to encourage them to stay in school; Volunteers in Service to America (VISTA), a domestic version of the Peace Corps, which placed concerned citizens with community-based agencies to work towards empowerment of the poor; the Model Cities Program for urban redevelopment; Upward Bound, which assisted poor high school students entering college; legal services for the poor; and the Food Stamp Act of 1964 (which expanded the federal food stamp program).

Great Society

Programs included the Community Action Program, which initiated local Community Action Agencies charged with helping the poor become self-sufficient; and Project Head Start, which offered preschool education for poor children. In addition, funding was provided for the establishment of community health centers to expand access to health care,[15] while major amendments were made to Social Security in 1965 and 1967 which significantly increased benefits, expanded coverage, and established new programs to combat poverty and raise living standards.[16] In addition, average AFDC payments were 35% higher in 1968 than in 1960, but remained insufficient and uneven

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Society#Pr...

EW Jackson says Great Society worse for black families than slavery

Level 1

Since: Dec 11

Morristown, NJ

#664 Jul 18, 2013
wotnogwavy wrote:
<quoted text>
Not suppose to be into metal music because you're black??? Well somebody should go and tell all the dudes singing and playing in metal bands they can't do that cause they are black. lol
As far as I know, black people can be as individual as say, a white person, vice versa. Mate, just be yourself, when you hit your forties like I am, you'll realise having angst over what other random people may or may not think of you means jack.
The ONLY people that count in life is family and those special friends you make along the way.
I have a son into metal, a daughter who is a petite pretty 18 year old blonde blue eyed girl that *looks* the "type " that would follow Beiber (there, said the distasteful word...lol) but is into Iron Maiden, Ghost and a host of others whose names escape me. She has also copped flack from peers for her non conformist tastes, but now doesn't give a hoot. The remaining daughter has a range of tastes from classical to country and western, but hates metal.
You sound like you've got your head screwed on and unlike others are not sheep like in behaviour. Good for you!!
Thanks, I've never understood the kind of mentality I've seen so much within the black community. It wasn't how I was raised- and I don't like it, and I think that type of mentality within the black community- is what needs to be talked about; not race lol.

Level 1

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#665 Jul 18, 2013
Ink_knight wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks, I've never understood the kind of mentality I've seen so much within the black community. It wasn't how I was raised- and I don't like it, and I think that type of mentality within the black community- is what needs to be talked about; not race lol.
Exactly, its the mentality within the Black Community that is the problem and people like Jessie Jackson & Al Sharpton and Organization like the NAACP keep that mentality alive that doing harm to the public imagine of the Black Community in US Society.

“Antisocialistic”

Level 2

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#666 Jul 18, 2013
Abdurratln wrote:
<quoted text>The police specifically told that phagg not to follow Treyvon.

Prep-for-Dep wrote, "<quoted text>Repeating your propaganda is not going to change facts. A dispatcher told Zimmerman,"we don't need you to do that". As hard as you try, you can never turn that into police telling him not to follow someone. Besides, prove Zimmerman didn't start heading back to his truck at that point. Oh, that's right, the prosecution couldn't prove that either."

Bytch, I do not have to "prove" anything. I hope someone kills that bastard. And all of you racist dogs need to lay off my people.

Prep-for-Dep wrote, "<quoted text>Oh, so you want the legal system to punish him, but you do not want to use the legal definitions used to construct and enforce the laws you CLAIM he broke. That makes perfect liberal sense.
That is priceless! A man that was found NOT GUILTY, was indisputably breaking the law, in your mind. That explains sooooooo much!
"

He was found not guilty of murder. He was guilty of stalking but he was not charged. The point is Zimmerman was in the wrong. And now the feds will prosecute him for civil rights violations. That is the correct thing to do. And that is my main point. End of discussion.
Again, repeating propaganda doesn't make it fact.
http://m.wftv.com/videos/news/raw-911-call-zi...

And, again, surveilling someone for a few minutes does NOT make them guilty of stalking. If the jury had felt Zimmerman was guilty of stalking, they would not have found him NOT GUILTY of second degree murder.

“Antisocialistic”

Level 2

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#667 Jul 18, 2013
Ink_knight wrote:
<quoted text>Ah, I've seen him on Glenn Beck's channel (waits for the crazies, to have a fit that I mentioned Glenn Beck) lol.
Lol, yep. It gets their blood pressure up. The only name that gets a rise out of them faster, is Rush Limbaugh.

Level 8

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#669 Jul 18, 2013
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>that is what the thinking of the 1960's was about empowering the poor with the Pseudo Liberals Democrat's & LBJ's Great Society which is and was total failure and Chicago Illinois is proof of that and EW Jackson is telling the truth.
No, idiot. In the 1960's the slogan was Power to the People. This is why I hate having Neanderthals in this forum and in our business, You NEVER know what the eff you are talking about when it comes to our affairs.

Power to the people allowed middle class Africans and other middle men to lord it over poor people. That is why none of that worked it was all based on liberal elitism. Empower the poor is the opposite because it places power in the hands of poor who will not have to depend on the sweet mercies of idiots like you and the liberals. We will oppose such non-sense as "gay rights" and "sexual revolution". Not only that, we will not allow "gays" to even have a voice in our affairs.

Level 8

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#670 Jul 18, 2013
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
<quoted text>
Again, repeating propaganda doesn't make it fact.
http://m.wftv.com/videos/news/raw-911-call-zi...
And, again, surveilling someone for a few minutes does NOT make them guilty of stalking. If the jury had felt Zimmerman was guilty of stalking, they would not have found him NOT GUILTY of second degree murder.
That phagg was guilty of violating Treyvon by following him. That is a violation of the USA constitution, POS. The police, nobody, has the right to do that.

Level 8

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#671 Jul 18, 2013
Prep-for-Dep wrote:
<quoted text>
Lol, yep. It gets their blood pressure up. The only name that gets a rise out of them faster, is Rush Limbaugh.
Rush is a clown. I listen to him for comic release some times.

Level 1

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#672 Jul 18, 2013
Abdurratln wrote:
<quoted text>
No, idiot. In the 1960's the slogan was Power to the People. This is why I hate having Neanderthals in this forum and in our business, You NEVER know what the eff you are talking about when it comes to our affairs.
Power to the people allowed middle class Africans and other middle men to lord it over poor people. That is why none of that worked it was all based on liberal elitism. Empower the poor is the opposite because it places power in the hands of poor who will not have to depend on the sweet mercies of idiots like you and the liberals. We will oppose such non-sense as "gay rights" and "sexual revolution". Not only that, we will not allow "gays" to even have a voice in our affairs.
no the idiot is you and I provided you with the link with what the 1960's was all about and the Great Society and where US Society went wrong.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Society

Level 1

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#673 Jul 18, 2013
Abdurratln wrote:
<quoted text>
Rush is a clown. I listen to him for comic release some times.
I wouldnt waste my time with Rush Limbaugh.

Level 8

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#674 Jul 18, 2013
I meant to say "comic relief".

Level 1

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#675 Jul 18, 2013
Abdurratln wrote:
<quoted text>
That phagg was guilty of violating Treyvon by following him. That is a violation of the USA constitution, POS. The police, nobody, has the right to do that.
more nonsense and Trayvon Martin violated Zimmermans rights that night by attacking him.

Level 1

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#676 Jul 18, 2013
Abdurratln wrote:
I meant to say "comic relief".
I understood exactly what you were saying about Rush Limbaugh.

Level 8

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#677 Jul 18, 2013
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>no the idiot is you and I provided you with the link with what the 1960's was all about and the Great Society and where US Society went wrong.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Society
I do not need a link to know why the Great Society failed. It failed because of the elitism inherent in liberalism. Liberalism has never done anything that I would call positive for Africans or poor people. The ONLY way to solve our [problems is by empowerment. In the 1960's it was Black Power. It is still Black Power. This meant freeing all of the colonies in Africa. Once we Africans gain control of our own affairs we will use that power to make decisions that benefit our own people. This applies in Africa, the other African majority countries such the Caribbean. It also applies in every African majority polity in the USA. Right the liberals have that power. But my Convention People's Party is not liberal. We will build a power base from the ground up by empowering the poorest of the poor. That will cut out the Dummycrat Party once and for all. At the national level we will support either the Dummycrats or the GOP depending on who offers us the best deal. In the next election that would be anybody who is not a liberal. Right now the liberals are too beholden to the homosexuals to even take them seriously at all on any issue. It will take them decades to solve their homosexual problem And we will not support them until they do solve it.

Level 8

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#678 Jul 18, 2013
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>more nonsense and Trayvon Martin violated Zimmermans rights that night by attacking him.
That was self-defense.
Level 1

Since: Dec 11

Morristown, NJ

#681 Jul 18, 2013
Abdurratln wrote:
<quoted text>
That was self-defense.
SOOOOOOOO... What Trayvon did is called assault- not self-defense.

Trayvon was a little thug, but you wouldn't think that- looking at the cute photos of the 12 year old kid, the media kept showing. Does this mean Trayvon was up to trouble that night? No, I don't believe so, he was just visiting his father's. Was Zimmerman wrong doing what he did? No, he's neighborhood watch, in a neighborhood that has had quite a lot of crime- and now he sees an unfamiliar person- who fits the description of many of the other guys who has caused crime in the community.

If Trayvon was sooo scared, he could have done 1 of 2 things.

1. Get off the phone with his dumb girl, and call his father or police- letting them know some strange guy is following him.

OR

2. Get to his father's house, since he was not close to it; tell his father to call the police, because of some weird guy. Police would have shown up- probably saw Zimmerman in the area, deduce he was the "weird guy" mentioned in the call, questioned him- to which it would have been deduced Zimmerman was the guy who called about the suspicious guy- to which it would have come out, that the suspicious guy was visiting his dad, and the creepy guy was neighborhood watch. At the end of the night, it would have been seen as one big misunderstanding, and both would have gone home, and Trayvon would still be alive.

BUT

Trayvon HAD to go back lol.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min Coffee Party 1,567,924
Black Women Unconciously Desire White Men (Jan '16) 5 min Monty 108
I need proof that the Ancient Egyptians Were No... (Oct '07) 7 min dreamhunk 34,675
News a Unit cohesiona and how ita s been used to jus... 19 min Oscar 4
New evidence of non human DNA found in black Af... 23 min Paul 73
STFU So-called WHITE Feminists 30 min Yisraelite Suprem... 5
Another video of a ww racially abusing a bm. C... 58 min Yisraelite Suprem... 26
News Anti-racist author Tim Wise: White America desp... 1 hr Fun Facts 933
Do black men really have larger penises? (Sep '10) 1 hr luvher 1,555
This young black man has officially returned. 9 hr SlayWithTheTruth 31
More from around the web