Romney Has Zero Percent Support From ...

Romney Has Zero Percent Support From African Americans In New NBC/WSJ Poll

There are 838 comments on the Mediaite.com story from Aug 21, 2012, titled Romney Has Zero Percent Support From African Americans In New NBC/WSJ Poll. In it, Mediaite.com reports that:

A new NBC/WSJ poll out Tuesday shows President Barack Obama with a four-point lead over presumptive GOP nominee Mitt Romney .

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Mediaite.com.

Level 8

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#622 Sep 8, 2012
Pamela wrote:
<quoted text>Dick Cheney was so crazy that he wanted to bomb Syria. He wanted to invade Iraq, bomb Syria and invade Iran. These people are insane. I see. So the Chinese will take action, they just keep quiet for now. Syria is with Iran, Russia is in with China to a point. Russia has some oil it sells to China and Russia is in collapse and deteriorating so it is kind of looking for partners all over the place. At one point the EU wanted Russia to join it, about two years ago, but now the EU is collapsing. Also, it wanted Turkey to join the EU, but see Turkey and Russia have always hated each other. So now Russia sides with China and Iran. So, yes it would be WWIII if we invaded Iran, so why in the world does Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum and Romney go on and on about having a war with Iran? I think it is to carry out the rest of Bush/Cheney's plans. It's all about oil, the oil companies and profits for the war companies.
No. It is actually very simple. Ruusia (and China) will not allow NATO to set up military bases on their borders. That is the bottom line.
Mike

Tampa, FL

#623 Sep 8, 2012
if it were not for the white vote, our incompetent leader would have lost in 08 and I'm sure he'll get quite a few whites to vote for him again but could you imagine the cries of RACISM if the title of this story was ROMNEY GETS 100% WHITE VOTE?

Level 8

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#624 Sep 8, 2012
The Chinese virtually slapped Hitlery in Beijuing a couple of days ago. That shows how badly things have deteriorated under Obama. We are getting closer and closer to World War III. I hope Romeny has more sense than that. But no matter, Obama has gomne way too far both in Ahghanistan and Iran. Fo rone thing, the policy on Iran is a complete and absolute failure. israel is theatenijg to attack Iran before the election. That would set the whole world on fire. Obama is too much of a coward and a pansy to rein in israel.
Pamela

Citrus Heights, CA

#625 Sep 8, 2012
Abdurratln wrote:
<quoted text>
No. Clinton effed up the economy. He used gimmicks to balance the budget and left the fundamentals all screwed up. That is why the budget went out of balance as soon as he left office. It is all a propaganda trick. But, he did not do anything that fundamentally improved the economy. By keeping wages low, he actucally did more harm than good.
No. What happened is the Internet was invented when Clinton was in office, and Microsoft was invented, the personal home computer, so 22 million jobs were created while Clinton was in office because people went out for the first time and bought home computers, printers, digital cameras, software, hardware, on and on the purchases went, and because of the Internet, all of these new Internet companies were created. Now, you could say it was Bill Gates not Bill Clinton who created a lot of those jobs. And, then, what happened is everyone was doing IPOs, so people were buying and buying into all of these new Internet companies assuming they would all be successful. Then, a lot of them went under, so this is the recession that Bush inherited. But, then rather than letting the market make the correction, rather than letting the business cycle play itself out, like Ron Paul would say, Bush had the Federal Reserve create a housing bubble to cover up the dot.com crash. Then, under Bush the real estate bubble burst. Now we are close to a bond market bust due to the policies of the Fed too. So then Obama got the real estate bust and then he ran up $5 trillion more debt to fake prop the country back up. Soon the bond market will collapse and also the dollar is going to collapse and no longer be the world's reserve currency. China and Russia have been working on that.
Pamela

Citrus Heights, CA

#626 Sep 8, 2012
If you gave ANY president the invention of home computers, the invention of an easy computer operating system anyone can use and you gave any president the invention of the Internet, you would have the hottest economy on the planet. You would have all of this job creation, lots of tax money coming in and tons of GDP growth. All Clinton had to do was sit back and watch it all happen.
Pamela

Citrus Heights, CA

#627 Sep 8, 2012
Abdurratln wrote:
<quoted text>
No. It is actually very simple. Ruusia (and China) will not allow NATO to set up military bases on their borders. That is the bottom line.
I don't think Russia will even exist at all ten years from now. After it collapsed, it began to decay and more people are dying off than are being born and many people are leaving. It would have to be able to offer China a lot of oil in order to have a strong alliance with China, and China now is also sinking due to a few things, one being the west at large not able to buy much from them due to their recessions. Another problem China has is massive pollution from allowing American companies to manufacture there and not having any regulations regarding air, soil and water pollution. It's water is so polluted and it is also very short on water and not getting along with India due to arguments over water. Also, it built these ghost cities where the communist government decided to build and build to increase China's GDP, but then the don't have people making the money to be able to buy the condos, so they have been sitting empty for years. Even China has begun to do stimulus to try to keep going while Europe and the U.S. have reduced their purchases from China. It remains to be seen how this plays out because if Romney gets elected he will do a trade war with China. He did a deal with Donald Trump to have a trade war with China. If he wins and he does force China's currency up to its real value and he does impose tariffs on Chinese imports, China may collapse rather than the U.S. Remains to be seen. And, if China collapses over a trade war with the West, Russia is completely finished. Anything can happen up until the point of a trade war with China.

Level 8

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#628 Sep 8, 2012
Mike wrote:
if it were not for the white vote, our incompetent leader would have lost in 08 and I'm sure he'll get quite a few whites to vote for him again but could you imagine the cries of RACISM if the title of this story was ROMNEY GETS 100% WHITE VOTE?
I do not fully understand it. But wherever you look you will see that blacks have a tendency to vote overwhelmingly for one side or the other. The multiple party idea is essentially a white European thing. Blacks, be they in Africa, the Carribean, Latin America of the USA tend to vote in one direction, I think. Andf it g=has little to do with liberalism. In Zimbabwe, ZANU-PF is not a liberal party. But it has won every election since independence and is projected to win the next one.(Japan has also eleceted a conservative party is nearly every election.) Look at Egypt and Tunisia and all the others where there are elections. Not once have the liberals won.

Level 8

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#629 Sep 8, 2012
Pamela wrote:
<quoted text>No. What happened is the Internet was invented when Clinton was in office, and Microsoft was invented, the personal home computer, so 22 million jobs were created while Clinton was in office because people went out for the first time and bought home computers, printers, digital cameras, software, hardware, on and on the purchases went, and because of the Internet, all of these new Internet companies were created. Now, you could say it was Bill Gates not Bill Clinton who created a lot of those jobs. And, then, what happened is everyone was doing IPOs, so people were buying and buying into all of these new Internet companies assuming they would all be successful. Then, a lot of them went under, so this is the recession that Bush inherited. But, then rather than letting the market make the correction, rather than letting the business cycle play itself out, like Ron Paul would say, Bush had the Federal Reserve create a housing bubble to cover up the dot.com crash. Then, under Bush the real estate bubble burst. Now we are close to a bond market bust due to the policies of the Fed too. So then Obama got the real estate bust and then he ran up $5 trillion more debt to fake prop the country back up. Soon the bond market will collapse and also the dollar is going to collapse and no longer be the world's reserve currency. China and Russia have been working on that.
We cannot blame China or Russia. That worked under Clinton when he blamed Japan. But, it will not work against two superpowers who have huge militaries and will not take any bullying.

Of course, jobs were created under the internet boom. But, that did not change the fundamentals that are dragging down the economy now. For one thing, the housing bubble was about 30 years old. Both Democrats and Republicans have to take the blame for that. And, the low wages ate into the consumer market bringibng the economy to a virtual depression. More people should have been able to buy computers. That may have prevented or retarded the collapse. The real problem is ripping off poor workers. Blame Clinotn for that. Things actually got better under Bush. But because things were so out of balance, it contributed to a total collapse. In other words, Clinton's budget and Clinton's economy were not sustainable due to un-babalanced low wages, mainly. I do not see why people want to deny this. We cannot have a healthy economy until the poor blacks get a fair deal. Things will always collapse. There will always been crisis followed by another crisis. That is because the poor blacks are in a permanent state of crisis. So, to solve the problem, we have to find a solution to poverty. When that happens, more people will pay taxes. And, more people will buy computers, etc. Right now, we have a situation where it has taken blacks 30 years behind the whites to buy computers.

Level 8

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#630 Sep 8, 2012
Pamela wrote:
If you gave ANY president the invention of home computers, the invention of an easy computer operating system anyone can use and you gave any president the invention of the Internet, you would have the hottest economy on the planet. You would have all of this job creation, lots of tax money coming in and tons of GDP growth. All Clinton had to do was sit back and watch it all happen.
But, it did not happen. Poor blacks could not buy computers. And this led to a drag down of the entire system. It also contributed to the housing burst because poor blacks were paying high as heck rents; but could not buy homes. That is where things were out of balance. And that is what caused the collapse.

Level 8

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#631 Sep 8, 2012
Pamela wrote:
<quoted text>I don't think Russia will even exist at all ten years from now.
You out of your mind. That is wishful thinking. Face reality: Russia exists now and has existed for a couple thousands years.

Pamela wrote:
<quoted text>After it collapsed, it began to decay and more people are dying off than are being born and many people are leaving. It would have to be able to offer China a lot of oil in order to have a strong alliance with China, and China now is also sinking due to a few things, one being the west at large not able to buy much from them due to their recessions.
LOL! China has NEVER had anything that could be callled recession. I would be hard pressed to find a recession in Russian history.

Pamela wrote:
<quoted text>Another problem China has is massive pollution from allowing American companies to manufacture there and not having any regulations regarding air, soil and water pollution. It's water is so polluted and it is also very short on water and not getting along with India due to arguments over water.
China leads the world in water desalination technology.

Pamela wrote:
<quoted text>Also, it built these ghost cities where the communist government decided to build and build to increase China's GDP, but then the don't have people making the money to be able to buy the condos, so they have been sitting empty for years. Even China has begun to do stimulus to try to keep going while Europe and the U.S. have reduced their purchases from China.
And, China is still going strong.

Pamela wrote:
<quoted text>It remains to be seen how this plays out because if Romney gets elected he will do a trade war with China.
And, loose a trade war with China.

Pamela wrote:
<quoted text>He did a deal with Donald Trump to have a trade war with China. If he wins and he does force China's currency up to its real value and he does impose tariffs on Chinese imports, China may collapse rather than the U.S. Remains to be seen. And, if China collapses over a trade war with the West, Russia is completely finished. Anything can happen up until the point of a trade war with China.
Wake up and face reality. Nothing major is going to happen to China or Russia. They simply will not take much more crap from the USA.
Pamela

Citrus Heights, CA

#632 Sep 8, 2012
Abdurratln wrote:
<quoted text>
You out of your mind. That is wishful thinking. Face reality: Russia exists now and has existed for a couple thousands years.
<quoted text>
LOL! China has NEVER had anything that could be callled recession. I would be hard pressed to find a recession in Russian history.
<quoted text>
China leads the world in water desalination technology.
<quoted text>
And, China is still going strong.
<quoted text>
And, loose a trade war with China.
<quoted text>
Wake up and face reality. Nothing major is going to happen to China or Russia. They simply will not take much more crap from the USA.
China is in a recession right now. For about 3 years now it's GDP instead of being 7-10 percent, it went way down to 2 percent and the Chinese government is doing QE type of stuff now, stimulus stuff. We won't lose a trade war with China. We can't lose. They have to bring their currency up to its real value, not us. They have tariffs on us already, we just do not have tariffs on them. Saudi Arabia is leading in turning salt water into fresh water. They use 100 million barrels of oil per year now to turn salt water into fresh water, since they ran out of fresh water.

Russia is OVER. It collapsed and is in never ending decline. Everyone knows that. And, China is trying to bring 1.4 billion people up to a high standard of living and trying to do massive capitalism based on huge manufacturing at the end of cheap oil. No way to do that. No cheap oil, the end of the rise of China. Europe and the U.S. keep buying less from China due to recession, China's GDP keeps shrinking. Oil goes up to $150 a barrel, China is in big, huge trouble in terms of manufacturing and shipping the things they manufacture. The reality is the future is about ending oil, the end of cheap oil, which will mean the end of globalization. It will soon be a lot cheaper to make things in one's own country and not have to ship it due to the high price of oil. Once globalization ends, China is on it's own. Plus, like I said, China is so polluted that over one million people per year die just from the smog, now with the added water and soil pollution, how many million per year will be dying? If they are basing their economy on oil at $30 a barrel, they won't survive. They are number one in clean coal technology and in solar, so we will see what they do, but my takeon it is that capitalism ONLY worked long ago when there was tons of cheap oil. And, when the small populations of the West were the manufacturers, yes, those countries could live fat. But, try doing that in China or India in 2012, with huge populations of 1.4 billion and 1.3 billion trying to rise up under massive pollution from carbon energy usage, under global warming disasters, droughts, floods, tsunamis, and with the end of cheap oil. There is no way huge countries like that can try the old capitalist model in 2012. It's an impossibility. Heck even the West can't do it anymore and they have much smaller populations. The future is localization, not globalization due to the high cost of ending oil.
Callin on da BS

Jersey City, NJ

#633 Sep 8, 2012

“I call it as I see it.”

Level 8

Since: Jul 09

Retirement City

#634 Sep 8, 2012
Abdurratln wrote:
<quoted text>
It is the economy stupid because Obama was stupid enough to limit himslef to the KKKLinton formula. The KKKlinton formula worked because minimum wage was held back to $4-5/hour. That changed under Bush. Now, workers must be paid to work. That means that it costs a lot more to create jobs. But, Obama has invested only what KKKLinton would have invested which is not enough. For example, we need more jobs in the black community. That would have prevented the cutrrent slow growth rate. But, KKKLinton was too racist to entertain such an approach. Although Obama is half black, he still has a raicst economic policy which is exactly the same as KKKLinotn's economic policy. Yet he is arrogant enough to imagine that we blacks are dumb enough to give KKKLinton 8 years, Obama 4 years plus another 4 years to Obama. LOL. I do not think so, Jack.
Faulty reasoning not to mention juvenile name calling. Most jobs pay considerably more thsn the minimum wage for starters. Higher pay scales also put more money into the economy without which no demand will be created. Many corporatoins are sitting on large cash reserves, but won't create more jobs because of lack of demand. BTW, it is nearly impossible even for a single adult to survive on a minimum wage without government help who isn't living with his parents.

“I call it as I see it.”

Level 8

Since: Jul 09

Retirement City

#635 Sep 8, 2012
Abdurratln wrote:
<quoted text>
No. Clinton effed up the economy. He used gimmicks to balance the budget and left the fundamentals all screwed up. That is why the budget went out of balance as soon as he left office. It is all a propaganda trick. But, he did not do anything that fundamentally improved the economy. By keeping wages low, he actucally did more harm than good.
At least Clinton did lower the deficits unlike all Republican presidents in the last 40 years.

Level 8

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#636 Sep 8, 2012
Pamela wrote:
<quoted text>China is in a recession right now. For about 3 years now it's GDP instead of being 7-10 percent, it went way down to 2 percent and the Chinese government is doing QE type of stuff now, stimulus stuff. We won't lose a trade war with China. We can't lose.
Talk sense.

Pamela wrote:
<quoted text>They have to bring their currency up to its real value, not us.
No. China is not tiny little Japan with no alternatives to USA bullying. Ber rational. They showed a couple days ago that they will not take cxrap from KKKLinotn. And they will not take crap from Romney or anybody else. China has the capability to rertaliate and they will retaliate if the USA is fool enouggh to start soem shyt that we cannot finish.

Pamela wrote:
<quoted text>They have tariffs on us already, we just do not have tariffs on them. Saudi Arabia is leading in turning salt water into fresh water. They use 100 million barrels of oil per year now to turn salt water into fresh water, since they ran out of fresh water.
Russia is OVER. It collapsed and is in never ending decline. Everyone knows that.
Oh please. You are wsting my effing time talking like a dam fool. Be rational.

Pamela wrote:
<quoted text>And, China is trying to bring 1.4 billion people up to a high standard of living and trying to do massive capitalism based on huge manufacturing at the end of cheap oil. No way to do that. No cheap oil, the end of the rise of China.Everyone knows that.

Bulllshyt again. China is on very good and friemndly terms in Africa. African people and Chinese people get along like dcousons,; unlike the racism from white Europeans. That means that Africa can and will absorb some of China's huge population taking a lot of pressure off China. Thias gies to prove that peaceful relations a re better than constant bullying and war.

[QUOTE who="Pamela"]<quo ted text>Europe and the U.S. keep buying less from China due to recession, China's GDP keeps shrinking.
LOL! Wishful thinking. See, Africa's gorwth rate is double digit. That means that Africa can and will take up any slack made by loss of western markets.

Pamela wrote:
<quoted text> Oil goes up to $150 a barrel, China is in big, huge trouble in terms of manufacturing and shipping the things they manufacture.
Look. Please. China can easily solve any oil problem simply by buying oil from Iran or Syria or Sudan or Nigeria or Venezuela, or Ghana or Somalia, etc.

T
Pamela wrote:
<quoted text>he reality is the future is about ending oil, the end of cheap oil, which will mean the end of globalization.
You are crazy.

Pamela wrote:
<quoted text>It will soon be a lot cheaper to make things in one's own country and not have to ship it due to the high price of oil.
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL!!!

Pamela wrote:
<quoted text> Once globalization ends, China is on it's own. Plus, like I said, China is so polluted that over one million people per year die just from the smog, now with the added water and soil pollution, how many million per year will be dying? If they are basing their economy on oil at $30 a barrel, they won't survive. They are number one in clean coal technology and in solar, so we will see what they do, but my takeon it is that capitalism ONLY worked long ago when there was tons of cheap oil. And, when the small populations of the West were the manufacturers, yes, those countries could live fat.
China is still predominatly a socialist economy, not a captialist one. But I am not going to debate with crazy people any dfurther on this matter.

Pamela wrote:
<quoted text> The future is localization, not globalization due to the high cost of ending oil.
Who the eff is talking about globalization anyhow?

Level 8

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#637 Sep 8, 2012
flbadcatowner wrote:
<quoted text>At least Clinton did lower the deficits unlike all Republican presidents in the last 40 years.
That was a gimmick. It was an illusion. It was not real. Only sdcukers fall for that kind of crap that Clinton did. I was never impressed with it. Poverty must end before the economy can be fixed or the national debt elemnated. This is due, for one reason, to the fact that the American economy was built on unpaid slave labor.

Level 2

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#638 Sep 8, 2012
nomad wrote:
That makes perfect sense romeys worked all his life ran companys been married and stayed with his wife raised his children .it just makes sense that blacks wouldn't saport him they have absolutely nothing in comin .
I was about to say that. They just dont have things in common.

Level 8

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#639 Sep 8, 2012
See, folks. We can never afford to let our guards down and try to treat racists crackers as if they are civilized humnan beings. They are not. They will go to any extent to try to impose white supremcy and divide and conquer on Asians and Africans. When we least expect it, they revert to their raw racism.

“I call it as I see it.”

Level 8

Since: Jul 09

Retirement City

#640 Sep 8, 2012
Abdurratln wrote:
<quoted text>
That was a gimmick. It was an illusion. It was not real. Only sdcukers fall for that kind of crap that Clinton did. I was never impressed with it. Poverty must end before the economy can be fixed or the national debt elemnated. This is due, for one reason, to the fact that the American economy was built on unpaid slave labor.
If it were all a gimmick as you claim, how about providing something more than your own pompous claims.
drink the hive

Anonymous Proxy

#641 Sep 8, 2012
Just Another Spore In The Wind...

http://obamaforwards.com/content/binary/BroGo...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 min JCPete 1,600,151
Marcus: thinking of leaving Topix 3 min Marcus Washington 16
Why do American Blacks think they're Egyptians? (Apr '12) 5 min Marcus Washington 3,742
Extremely Pleased about the Decline & Downfall ... 11 min Paul 8
mACEO WHY ARE YOU SO EVIL? 14 min Hmm the meanie 2
Hey Jizzrealite... explain again how your Gypsh... 15 min Paul 23
News Trump's lack of moral compass leaves America on... 24 min Paul 661
News Firefighter: I'd save dog over African-Americans 41 min Maceo is Legion 18
Why don't prostitutes sleep with black men? (Jul '16) 47 min Maceo is Legion 132
Why can't Blacks answer these questions? 2 hr Maceo is Legion 45
why whites here hate blacks so ? 9 hr CAC 40
More from around the web