WHITE PEOPLE are HUMAN ARTIFICIALS??(...
ATL

United States

#124 Nov 11, 2008
This is supposedly classified information at DULCE military base in New Mexico.This is what i found on the NET.If they can do this now,why couldnt black people do it thousands of years ago?:

-3rd Level - the first 3 levels contain government offices.
-4th Level - Human Aura Research as well as aspects of Dream Manipulation, Hypnosis, and Telepathy. They can lower your heartbeat with Delta Waves and introduce data and programmed reactions into your mind (for those implanted with brain chips). Most people already are, they just don't know it.
-5th Level - witnesses have described huge vats with amber liquid with parts of human bodies being stirred inside. ROWS and ROWS of cages holding MEN, WOMEN and CHILDREN to be used as FOOD!!!!. Perhaps thousands.
-6th Level= privately called "Nightmare Hall." It contains the genetic labs. Here are where the crossbreeding experiments of human/animal are done on fish, seals, birds, and mice that are vastly altered from their original forms. There are multi-armed and multi-legged humans and several cages and vats of humanoid bat-like creatures up to 7 feet tall.
-7th level - Row after row of 1,000s of humans in cold storage including children.
Wright Air Force Base - Dayton, Ohio. Includes a Warehouse with multi-levels underground packed with alien craft, hardware, and even bodies on ice. Headquarters of the infamous Project Blue Book.
I forgot to put the link on this post.

http://www.tearingdownstrongholds.com/joint-b ...

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#125 Nov 11, 2008
Akilah wrote:
<quoted text>
So if black ppl migrated to Europe and are still black, where does white skin come from? Scientists say it was a mutation, and some say it was a mutation from albinos which come from black people.
In a sense, they were created then b/c albinism isn't natural.
...the general consens in the scientific world is that europeans have a pale skin due to a mutation that took place in europe around 10.000-6.000 years ago...if it is because of environmental adaption or not...nobody knows really...maybe it is just a human variation...like blue eyes.
ATL

United States

#126 Nov 11, 2008
solomonic wrote:
<quoted text>
...the general consens in the scientific world is that europeans have a pale skin due to a mutation that took place in europe around 10.000-6.000 years ago...if it is because of environmental adaption or not...nobody knows really...maybe it is just a human variation...like blue eyes.
we as people tend to eat up anything they give us.

“I'm jus sayin”

Level 1

Since: Oct 07

United States

#127 Nov 11, 2008
On the Egyptian tamahu:

"There were tribes that were a source of great agitation for the Egyptians. Attracted by the wealth of the southern inhabitants, these tribes continuously raided their settlements. Historically, these "tamahu, as the Egyptians called them were described as having white skin, red to blond hair, and blue eyes. In the Egyptian language "tama" means people created and "hu" is white, light, or ivory"

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#128 Nov 11, 2008
ATL wrote:
<quoted text>we as people tend to eat up anything they give us.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =l4k_3cINkXgXX
...well I suppose whites are human beings like anyone else...just their own phenotype...

“ Ye shall know the Truth and ”

Since: Sep 08

The Truth Shall Blow Your Mind

#129 Nov 11, 2008
Akilah wrote:
<quoted text>
The Adam and Eve story I think is a parable from other stories. They weren't the first ppl here. Truthfully some of these stories overlap which makes me believe they all stem from an older story. Even the 6,000 year old making of the devil story overlaps with Adam and Eve. The Tamahu is really interesting. I'm still reseraching on why it means created white devil. Why would they have something like that in Egyptian times if some ppl believe 1)the Egyptians were white, and 2)the Egyptians never experimented in genetics or cloning.
Now as far as Darwin goes, I never believed that nonsense. But I do believe that albinism has something to do with this whole thing.
Any links in regard to the Tamahu?

“ Ye shall know the Truth and ”

Since: Sep 08

The Truth Shall Blow Your Mind

#130 Nov 11, 2008
Akilah wrote:
On the Egyptian tamahu:
"There were tribes that were a source of great agitation for the Egyptians. Attracted by the wealth of the southern inhabitants, these tribes continuously raided their settlements. Historically, these "tamahu, as the Egyptians called them were described as having white skin, red to blond hair, and blue eyes. In the Egyptian language "tama" means people created and "hu" is white, light, or ivory"
That would explain their present day behavior because they are still doing the exact same thing!

“just a Devil”

Level 1

Since: Nov 07

Bristol, England

#131 Nov 11, 2008
Akilah wrote:
<quoted text>
The interesting part about this is the cloning experiments, which go back further than 1945. Right now they are cloning things that the public has no clue about, so it wouldn't be too far fetched to think that the same thing happened in the past. The problem with white mentality is that they believe they are the beginning of everything and the inventors of everything, so the idea that Africans could have experimented in genetics is too far fetched to them.
But the Egyptians were knowledgeable about many things, that's why there is such a struggle over what race they were. If they were so knowledgeable in math, medicine, and science then why not cloning. It's not that far fetched.
I also heard that the Egyptions split the Atom first with somw flint and a rock... noooo, not far fetched at all - hahahaa!!!

“I'm jus sayin”

Level 1

Since: Oct 07

United States

#132 Nov 11, 2008
A Metal Fan wrote:
<quoted text>
Hypthothetically speaking, if what that nutjob says is true, and we are more than human. If you look at history with this in mind, does that mean Europeans are better than humans? i mean, we invented the modern world and pioneered the most effective ways to wage war.
So did you people create your own demise? did you create something more powerful than yourselves and now fear us?
This is all hypothetical, though.
Well I'll entertain your question asssuming you asked it seriously.

I don't think what he was saying is that Europeans are MORE than human. He was saying the opposite. I believe we're all human, but there were definitely some mutations that happened along the way. I don't think that makes you any better or worse, but it does signal the end of the genetic line as far as color goes. When the mutation happened it actually took something away, not gave you superpowers. LOL

As far as inventing the modern world, I think you're trying to take too much credit. Everyone had a hand in that.

And it's funny that you mention you created the most effective ways to wage war, b/c there was also a study done on the aggression, and warlike behavior of Europeans. The fact that you take pride in being the inventors of "more effective ways to wage war" is interesting. Look up the pineal gland & the third eye.

White ppl aren't going to be our demise. You will be your own demise. Colored ppl have been around for a long long time, not just black ppl, but all non white ppl and our numbers aren't the ones that are dwindling. Look it up.

And in actuality we don't fear you, you fear us. Now just think about this. You have been the one waging war against non white ppl for centuries. You waged war against ppl who had no weapons to defend themselves. You went as far as to wage psychological war, emotional war, and physcial war on ppl who you said were beneath you. Now with all that effort, who fears whom.
ATL

United States

#133 Nov 11, 2008
Akilah wrote:
On the Egyptian tamahu:
"There were tribes that were a source of great agitation for the Egyptians. Attracted by the wealth of the southern inhabitants, these tribes continuously raided their settlements. Historically, these "tamahu, as the Egyptians called them were described as having white skin, red to blond hair, and blue eyes. In the Egyptian language "tama" means people created and "hu" is white, light, or ivory"
There were Whites who came across the deserts and began to settle in areas in the North of Africa... But just like then as they are now... NOT INDIGENOUS TO THE LAND OF AFRICA NEVER WAS AND NEVER WILL BE...., The EGyptians called these people foreignors, Deshretus from with the word DESERT came from.... WHITES were not from EGYPT ...,

Deshretu MEANS DEVILS!.... YEAH THAT'S RIGHT.... THEY CALLED THEM THEN ...DEVILS.

“so it is”

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#134 Nov 11, 2008
Akilah wrote:
<quoted text>
I can see why you'd think this, and even if you think the guy in the video is nuts, there are other sources and other ppl who say similar things. I don't think it's trying to dehumanize white ppl, but the origins of white ppl have been a question for a long time. Even white scientists question it.
I though the origins of white people were black people, as were all people, and that any superficial differences are merely the most effective evolutionary adapations to climatic conditions (check out the genome project)- there's no mystery to it - except maybe the timescale these adaptations happened in. It's a vitamin D thing.

“I'm jus sayin”

Level 1

Since: Oct 07

United States

#135 Nov 11, 2008
ClairvoyantOfTruthDotCom wrote:
<quoted text>
Any links in regard to the Tamahu?
http://books.google.com/books...

and also the Egyptian book of the dead. They may have versions of it online.

“I'm jus sayin”

Level 1

Since: Oct 07

United States

#136 Nov 11, 2008
ATL wrote:
<quoted text>There were Whites who came across the deserts and began to settle in areas in the North of Africa... But just like then as they are now... NOT INDIGENOUS TO THE LAND OF AFRICA NEVER WAS AND NEVER WILL BE...., The EGyptians called these people foreignors, Deshretus from with the word DESERT came from.... WHITES were not from EGYPT ...,
Deshretu MEANS DEVILS!.... YEAH THAT'S RIGHT.... THEY CALLED THEM THEN ...DEVILS.
Yes, they thought of them as foreigners. The Greeks did too. It is said that they referred to them as devils and the Greeks called them barbarians & this is what they thought of barbarians:

Originally applied to the Persian invaders under Artaxerxes and Darius, the Greeks later referred to the invading peoples of Northern Europe as "barbarians."

Barbarians are driven by evil spirits; "possessed by demons", who force them to commit the most terrible acts...incapable of living according to written laws and only reluctantly tolerating kings...Their lust for gold is immense, their love of drink boundless. Barbarians are without restraint...Although generally they are considered good-looking, they are given to gross personal hygiene...They run dirty and barefoot, even in the winter...They grease their blond hair with butter and care not that it smells rancid...Their reproductive energy is inexhaustible; the Northern climate of their native land, with its long winter nights favors their fantastic urge to procreate...If a barbarian people is driven back or destroyed, another already emerges from the marshes and forests of Germany...Indeed, there are no new barbarian peoples--descendents of the same tribes keep appearing."

It sounds racist today, but this is what they recorded even in ancient times.

“Not African, we're Orginal!”

Since: Sep 08

The World

#138 Nov 11, 2008
Akilah wrote:
<quoted text>
This is really interesting too. There have been many studies that show the similarities b/w albino skin and white skin. I think albinos in those times were treated as lepers and they probably cast them out, kind of like how we treat disformed ppl nowadays. I kind of lean towards this theory more b/c I always question the black/white war that humans have had. To me it always seemed to go deeper than slavery, etc. If you cast a group of ppl out based on their skin and make them feel like outcasts, then if they ever gained power they would glorify themselves and make YOUR skin color seem like the inferior one.
I also believe that some of them have been created 'spiritually'(indoctrinated) in the Hindu areas in ancient times by the black masterminds of these areas. The word Man derives from Manu. The Manu character in the Hindu Sanskrit is in parallel with the story of Noah. The word has two parts 'Man' and 'u'. The 'u' was transformed to 'you'. The 'Man' appears in many Germanic and Anglo-Saxon languages. Egyptians (our people) did encounter these people. We called them Tamahu. But (i believe) that is not the right translation of the their title. We called them 'ta-man-u'(the men). Ta = is/are. White people need to look at Southern Asia for their origins and should stop fucking with Africa. We've been harmed and minipulated in more ways then one by these so-called men.

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#139 Nov 11, 2008
Dr Frankenheimer wrote:
<quoted text>
I though the origins of white people were black people, as were all people, and that any superficial differences are merely the most effective evolutionary adapations to climatic conditions (check out the genome project)- there's no mystery to it - except maybe the timescale these adaptations happened in. It's a vitamin D thing.
well, I wouldnt call it "evolutionary adaptions" but just "mutations" due to climatic conditions...since we all know that pale skin is nowadays even in europe a disadavantage (ozon layer)...skin cancer...
sense

Saint Charles, MO

#140 Nov 11, 2008
Akilah wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, they thought of them as foreigners. The Greeks did too. It is said that they referred to them as devils and the Greeks called them barbarians & this is what they thought of barbarians:
Originally applied to the Persian invaders under Artaxerxes and Darius, the Greeks later referred to the invading peoples of Northern Europe as "barbarians."
Barbarians are driven by evil spirits; "possessed by demons", who force them to commit the most terrible acts...incapable of living according to written laws and only reluctantly tolerating kings...Their lust for gold is immense, their love of drink boundless. Barbarians are without restraint...Although generally they are considered good-looking, they are given to gross personal hygiene...They run dirty and barefoot, even in the winter...They grease their blond hair with butter and care not that it smells rancid...Their reproductive energy is inexhaustible; the Northern climate of their native land, with its long winter nights favors their fantastic urge to procreate...If a barbarian people is driven back or destroyed, another already emerges from the marshes and forests of Germany...Indeed, there are no new barbarian peoples--descendents of the same tribes keep appearing."
It sounds racist today, but this is what they recorded even in ancient times.
Akilah,

You have posted this a few times. Yes, those may have been observations made back then, perhaps. I would not necessarily dispute that.

Even were that true, why would you post this as something to base your views on. What if I posted what Europeans thought of africans, when they first saw them? Would you like that? Would you respect that?

Europeans thought Africans were animals. That does not mean that I do, today. Nor would I post that as anything meaningful, other than the perception at that time.

It is coming across like you want us to accept you, yet you have strange views of us. I do not espouse nor cite views from the 16th 17th, or 18th centuries.
sense

Saint Charles, MO

#141 Nov 11, 2008
ATL wrote:
<quoted text>He makes a strong case here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =xM5iSGPUywMXX
Thanks for trying to back up your claim...
I find this to be uneducated, hard to follow, and nonsensical.

Do you really find him to sound well researched, or just talking off cuff. He has yet to produce a document.

Compare him to Dr Ben Carson, and you will see the difference as far as education, and credibility...
sense

Saint Charles, MO

#142 Nov 11, 2008
All of this speculation about the origin of Caucasians is sad.

This is as bad as the KKK speculations. I cannot believe that you all actually believe this.

It is worse than David Duke.

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#143 Nov 11, 2008
sense wrote:
<quoted text>
Akilah,
You have posted this a few times. Yes, those may have been observations made back then, perhaps. I would not necessarily dispute that.
Even were that true, why would you post this as something to base your views on. What if I posted what Europeans thought of africans, when they first saw them? Would you like that? Would you respect that?
Europeans thought Africans were animals. That does not mean that I do, today. Nor would I post that as anything meaningful, other than the perception at that time.
It is coming across like you want us to accept you, yet you have strange views of us. I do not espouse nor cite views from the 16th 17th, or 18th centuries.
...thats not true...the ancient greeks said that "ethiopians are the most handsome race on earth" and that "Zeus had dinner only with the ethiopians each time he came on earth" (Homer)...many ancient greek gods were thought to be ethiopians by the greeks...cassiopeia, memnon etc...

“so it is”

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#144 Nov 11, 2008
solomonic wrote:
<quoted text>
well, I wouldnt call it "evolutionary adaptions" but just "mutations" due to climatic conditions...since we all know that pale skin is nowadays even in europe a disadavantage (ozon layer)...skin cancer...
mmmm....how long then before an advantageous 'mutation' is classed as 'evolutionary' in climatic adaptation?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min Aquarius-WY 1,567,129
News Racism still prevalent 50 years after riots 30 ... 15 min WATCHING LIVONIA 73
News Anti-racist author Tim Wise: White America desp... 16 min KIP 912
If you post racist comments on this site, pleas... 34 min Ttt 3
If I could go back in time, I would.... 37 min Ttt 3
why do white people enjoy eating bloody meat? (Mar '11) 38 min Chalotte 309
So you black people really think you're like wh... 43 min Chalotte 2
New evidence of non human DNA found in black Af... 7 hr Yep 62
Microchips In Employees Become Reality 7 hr Prince 75
Do black men really have larger penises? (Sep '10) 11 hr Punani Bully 1,551
Can Blacks Be Impartial And Trusted Enough To ... 12 hr The Delighted Axe 156
More from around the web