BLACK PEOPLE are taking over Europe

“Yes WE Can! Yes we Will!”

Level 8

Since: Jul 07

Baltimore, Md.

#1653 Dec 31, 2012
RomanSoldier wrote:
<quoted text>
it's impossible
That is what was once often said about the idea of governing a society without a king. That is what was once said about maintaining civilization without slavery: Impossible.
But History has revealed the possibility (sometimes inevitability) of much of what was once seen as impossible.
Humankind is capable of more than we realize. And yes, we can be better than we are.
Anonymous

Europe

#1654 Dec 31, 2012
Black Deal wrote:
<quoted text>
How is man able to create earthquakes & tornadoes etc?
every activity that man does that includes deep mining till the earths core can-rouse earthquakes or the sliding of the earths plates,and some volcanic activity.
Air pollution and emission of dangerous gases causing global warming which is shown in the changes of climates,melting of snow caps.
Did you not pay attention in school??
Never did any lab experiments??

“Yes WE Can! Yes we Will!”

Level 8

Since: Jul 07

Baltimore, Md.

#1655 Dec 31, 2012
attai1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Sir,
i may be idealistic, who isn't when we speak of a distant future because that was the question of Bozino. i was responding to what he asked as rhetorical questions phrased in his usual abusive way.
That being said, in spite of the atrocities of white Apartheid, the Black rulership has not seen any mass extermination of Afrikaners. To give a single example.
Bozo is afraid - terrified, appalled - at the sole idea that the world will loose its present whitey rulership : i'm not. Is it so idealistic or rather realistic in the long term ?
a whiteboi
Oh, I'm in favor of idealism but not uncritical idealism. You may recall once in a private communication I was expressing my enthusiasm for the Arab Spring when you warned of the possibility of it being coopted in some countries by militant Islamicists. That didn't dim my enthusiasm, it did incline me toward a measure of caution. The struggle for freedom is an ongoing process which has its setbacks as well as its victories and great forward surges.
As for your point about Bozino's racial paranoia they are spot on.
No one was talking about exterminating whites. And no such thing has happened in South Africa, Mozambique, Angola, Namibia or other countries which suffered the horrors of fascistic white colonialism.
That vengeful spirit simply does not prevail among most of the indigenous leaders of these countries, or among most of the common people. Legitimate anger does not express itself in genocide--despite the fact that white rule in parts of Africa did at times border on (or cross the border of) genocide

bozino
Level 6

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#1656 Dec 31, 2012
Savant wrote:
<quoted text>
Again, since I MET Attai in person in 2010, and since I am not color blind, I KNOW that he's phenotypically white. Not an anti-Black racist moron like you or Bozino, but clearly Caucasian.
Claims to the contrary by you, Bozino and others are indicative of your dishonesty and stupidity.
Also, I see no evidence from his posts (nor from any of my conversations with him) tha he advocates the extermination of whites. As I see no evidence, as you also offer no evidence of this, I suspect your insistence on this point is an indication of some paranoid delusion on your part.
Lord Savant,

You are going to claim on an anonymous forum that you have met attai a blackened Africanus boi out of one side of your mouth, and then say that I am stupid out of the other? LOL. I already thoroughly embarrassed you on a previous thread about making asinine claims like this on an anonymous forum. Remember when I told you that I met attai a blackened Africanus boi? He was black as coal so apparently you are blind. The point being that it is ludicrous for you to claim that you have met him. Comprende?

He just claimed in a previous post that he envisioned setting up a type of zoo for White people to ensure they do not go extinct. Is that evidence enough for you viceroy?

By the way, I am still waiting for you to recant your racist statement about the unequal funding of public education in Maryland.
LovinLife1974

Since: Aug 09

Location hidden

#1657 Dec 31, 2012
in africa it is tradition to allow a 12yr male to scalp an alpha pig skin in front of his family. it signifies his transition into manhood....the weapon of choice is a basic hand carved wooden club with a razor type mechanism at the tip. the weight of the club allows effortless scalping of the intended pig skin... yes primitive, but highly effective
Black Deal

United States

#1658 Dec 31, 2012
Agassi baby wrote:
<quoted text>
every activity that man does that includes deep mining till the earths core can-rouse earthquakes or the sliding of the earths plates,and some volcanic activity.
Air pollution and emission of dangerous gases causing global warming which is shown in the changes of climates,melting of snow caps.
Did you not pay attention in school??
Never did any lab experiments??
So ancient mfs did all that shit to?

You clowning here

bozino
Level 6

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#1659 Dec 31, 2012
attai1 wrote:
<quoted text>
you can't even read and understand the plain standard English i'm using in my post. You'd better go back to primary school before posting any comment.
a whiteboi
Attai a blackened Africanus boi,

Then please answer the questions that are put to you in intelligible English. I will repeat the post. You have expressed your opinion that you believe the increasing population of Negroes in Europe to be a wonderful development on numerous occasions. My question for you is simple. Do you believe that the complete replacement of White Europeans with Negroes is desirable? You said before that you thought that Negroes out of the goodness of their heart will try and keep Whites from going extinct as if we are zoo animals. So answer the questions directly or kindly close your mouth sire.

“Yes WE Can! Yes we Will!”

Level 8

Since: Jul 07

Baltimore, Md.

#1660 Dec 31, 2012
bozino wrote:
<quoted text>
Lord Savant,
You are going to claim on an anonymous forum that you have met attai a blackened Africanus boi out of one side of your mouth, and then say that I am stupid out of the other? LOL. I already thoroughly embarrassed you on a previous thread about making asinine claims like this on an anonymous forum. Remember when I told you that I met attai a blackened Africanus boi? He was black as coal so apparently you are blind. The point being that it is ludicrous for you to claim that you have met him. Comprende?
He just claimed in a previous post that he envisioned setting up a type of zoo for White people to ensure they do not go extinct. Is that evidence enough for you viceroy?
By the way, I am still waiting for you to recant your racist statement about the unequal funding of public education in Maryland.
First of all, it was first Zaius and then you who claimed--without EVIDENCE--that Attai was black and identical with myself. Frankly, I'm not even obligated to reply. For whoever makes a claim bears the burden of proof. And frankly, I think either you know better or that you are as stupid and parnoid as those simpletons who think that Barack Obama is a "Muslim Communist" from Kenya.
Since even a CURSORY glance as scholarly research done over that past 60 years shows that the GENERAL PATTERN has been one in which more funds are spent on the education of white than Black youths, I await your recantation of your position to the contrary. One link compared o volumes of studies doesn't constitute a refutation.
Also, you reveal your stupidity by describing as racist my statement--repeatedly confirmed by social scientific studies-- about inequalities in education. But it doesn't surprise me. It is fashionable nowadays for white racists to have the effrontery to charge others (even the most determined foes of racism) with racism.
Now you claimed that you met Attai, and that he was Black. Either you're lying, delusional or perhaps met (which I doubt) some Black Frenchman named Attai.
But I do know that the person going by the name of Attai in Topix is a white Frenchman.
I don't recall Attai advocating either genocide against whites or the confinement to zoos. I can't imagine that he'd want to see his own family exterminated.
But on second thought, a zoo (or psychiatric ward) is may be the most suitable dwelling for you white racists.

bozino
Level 6

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#1661 Dec 31, 2012
Savant wrote:
<quoted text>
First of all, it was first Zaius and then you who claimed--without EVIDENCE--that Attai was black and identical with myself. Frankly, I'm not even obligated to reply. For whoever makes a claim bears the burden of proof. And frankly, I think either you know better or that you are as stupid and parnoid as those simpletons who think that Barack Obama is a "Muslim Communist" from Kenya.
Since even a CURSORY glance as scholarly research done over that past 60 years shows that the GENERAL PATTERN has been one in which more funds are spent on the education of white than Black youths, I await your recantation of your position to the contrary. One link compared o volumes of studies doesn't constitute a refutation.
Also, you reveal your stupidity by describing as racist my statement--repeatedly confirmed by social scientific studies-- about inequalities in education. But it doesn't surprise me. It is fashionable nowadays for white racists to have the effrontery to charge others (even the most determined foes of racism) with racism.
Now you claimed that you met Attai, and that he was Black. Either you're lying, delusional or perhaps met (which I doubt) some Black Frenchman named Attai.
But I do know that the person going by the name of Attai in Topix is a white Frenchman.
I don't recall Attai advocating either genocide against whites or the confinement to zoos. I can't imagine that he'd want to see his own family exterminated.
But on second thought, a zoo (or psychiatric ward) is may be the most suitable dwelling for you white racists.
Satrap Savant,

Please stop the act. That is not what you said and you very well know it. You stated that the funding for education for Negroes was less than that of the other races of man. I PROVED TO YOU that you were caught in a bald faced lie. Here are two links that prove you are wrong.

http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2011...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/22/publ...

The post in question said nothing about the past 60 years. Since the mid-60's the other races of man have put forth honest efforts to address historical wrongs inflicted upon African Americans. This is particularly true of the Baltimore Washington metropolitan area.

The obvious conclusion concerning this discussion is quite clear. You refuse to acknowledge the honest, sincere, and genuine efforts of the other races of man to elevate the lowly Negro. Even when confronted with irrefutable evidence that Negro children are receiving more money per pupil than any of the other races of man you continue to espouse Jimmy Crow mentality charges of racism. I openly admit that African Americans have been systematically persecuted throughout American history. Things have changed in the last 50 years though in case you have not been paying attention. Common sense tells any thinking person that your opinions are not only outdated, but obvious attempts to cover up the failure of Negroes to progress academically even when given funding advantages. You need to begin thinking about at what point you will begin to accept the reality that Negro failures in education are due to a different factor other than racism. I apologize for the verbose nature of my post your lordship.

bozino
Level 6

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#1662 Dec 31, 2012
attai1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Provided we use - i don't - your offensive words, the question you ask is mainly irrelevant. As sir Reality Speaks repeated countless of times, it is hard to figure that extinction of white population could really happen before a minimum of 200 years : so we won't ever see it you and me. We're moving into complete fiction but why not.
Personally i don't think this perspective of a complete extinction is appealing to a large majority of Black people. Considering how humane and caring Black people are during centuries, we can expect that a Black Society for the preservation of the white endangered specie will be created.
The main aim is to destroy the vain idea of whiteness and the white matrix that is moulding our thoughts worldwide. The constant demographic decline is undoubtedly helping this destruction but you may be objective enough to see that it is a self-destruction.
Can a better world come out of this crumbling of the white matrix ? yes i do think so.
Have white people any legitimacy to impose their cultural/economical/political dominion on earth for ever and ever ? According to me : no.
a whiteboi
Lord Savant,

Please read the above post and tell me what you believe attai a blackened Africanus boi meant then when he stated that he thinks that a Negro society for the preservation of the endangered White species will be created. For you to back up this post, and then claim to be a non-racist is ridiculous. Why do you refuse to be consistent in your beliefs sire?

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#1664 Dec 31, 2012
Savant wrote:
<quoted text>
First of all, you don't know Attai's mentor nor what it is that his mentor is teaching. So stop making shyt up.
Also, you don't have the foggiest notion of what ideas I am promoting---as is evident from some of your posts to me in another thread. Your bigotry has eroded your critical faculties--assuming you ever had such faculties.
I told you before about PRESUMING things. ASK, and maybe I or someone else can instruct you.
You said you did a seminar on "ending whiteness." It's pretty obvious what ideas you are pushing. What am I missing? And yes, I do know what "ending whiteness" means. I haven't caught up on that other thread yet.

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#1665 Dec 31, 2012
Savant wrote:
<quoted text>
He has been accused of hating white folks and calling for their destruction simply because he calls for the destruction of white supremacy. But progresssive whites with humanistic values also call for the end of white supremacy, and are denounced as "race traitors" by white racists and reactionaries. A CLASS issue.
By "progressive whites with humanistic values" you could mean a lot of things. The keyword, though, when talking about a lot of these thinkers is indeed "CLASS." They were Marxists and outright communists. They had a very materialistic worldview. That's where a lot of this comes from.
This is a somewhat reductionist mindset, where everything is seen as class struggle, even race. These people seem to even reduce race as a proxy for class. When this is done, a whole host social, cultural, etc., notions are cast aside.
Do you not see where this causes a problem? Do you not see how this makes some people see you as soulless? You see "white supremacy" where there is none. You see "white privilege" (your enemy) where it doesn't really exist. That's why I was saying in another thread these are bad historical analyses that reduced racial issues to issues over class struggle.
I don't think you understand how your battling against "oppression", class warfare, etc., actually play into the hands of the neoliberal elites (global capitalists). You leftists and the global capitalists actually have a symbiotic relationship with each other.
BTW, you mentioned a James Baldwin quote that you repeat often. I've not read James Baldwin but I have been recommended to read him by people I respect. I've heard that he's perhaps one of this country's best authors.

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#1666 Dec 31, 2012
Savant wrote:
<quoted text>
That is what was once often said about the idea of governing a society without a king. That is what was once said about maintaining civilization without slavery: Impossible.
But History has revealed the possibility (sometimes inevitability) of much of what was once seen as impossible.
Humankind is capable of more than we realize. And yes, we can be better than we are.
History is open-ended as far as I'm concerned. I strongly disagree with Fukuyama's thesis of "The End of History" (again I've not actually read his book, only about it. So I probably shouldn't "strongly" disagree until I actually read the thing myself -- I have a lot of reading to do).

“Yes WE Can! Yes we Will!”

Level 8

Since: Jul 07

Baltimore, Md.

#1667 Dec 31, 2012
Walter Henrickson wrote:
<quoted text>
You said you did a seminar on "ending whiteness." It's pretty obvious what ideas you are pushing. What am I missing? And yes, I do know what "ending whiteness" means. I haven't caught up on that other thread yet.
No I did not say that i did a seminar on ending whiteness. i said that while doing a lecture at Duquesne Univeristy last month I encountered some WHITE students who were talking about ending whieness--one blonde lady even using the words "killing" whiteness.
As for your posts you show no signs of having a clue to the ways notions of race, and especially whiteness is used in areas like Critical Race Studies or Cultural Studies. And hence you can have no notion of what may be meant by ending whiteness or (for ossme writers)"blackneness "
Again, I don't claim expertise in these areas either. But i at least read enough of the literature to what what folk are talking about.
Still, I can tell you that many people in Philosophy (my area)regard race either as a social creation, or a bogus concept. Most seem not to buy into the idea of race as a creation of nature. And neither to most scientists in areas like genetics.

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#1668 Dec 31, 2012
bozino wrote:
<quoted text>
He just claimed in a previous post that he envisioned setting up a type of zoo for White people to ensure they do not go extinct.
He sure did say that. I frequently find people cheering on or gloating of White demographic decline. It's a more widely held attitude than some people on this thread would acknowledge.

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#1669 Dec 31, 2012
bozino wrote:
<quoted text>
Attai a blackened Africanus boi,
Then please answer the questions that are put to you in intelligible English. I will repeat the post. You have expressed your opinion that you believe the increasing population of Negroes in Europe to be a wonderful development on numerous occasions. My question for you is simple. Do you believe that the complete replacement of White Europeans with Negroes is desirable? You said before that you thought that Negroes out of the goodness of their heart will try and keep Whites from going extinct as if we are zoo animals. So answer the questions directly or kindly close your mouth sire.
He's sick. Savant just said something like that he had an overly romantic view of blacks. Well, that's the understatement of the century. I've already said what I think should happen to attai1 and I won't repeat it.

“Yes WE Can! Yes we Will!”

Level 8

Since: Jul 07

Baltimore, Md.

#1670 Dec 31, 2012
bozino wrote:
<quoted text>
Attai a blackened Africanus boi,
Then please answer the questions that are put to you in intelligible English. I will repeat the post. You have expressed your opinion that you believe the increasing population of Negroes in Europe to be a wonderful development on numerous occasions. My question for you is simple. Do you believe that the complete replacement of White Europeans with Negroes is desirable? You said before that you thought that Negroes out of the goodness of their heart will try and keep Whites from going extinct as if we are zoo animals. So answer the questions directly or kindly close your mouth sire.
Where precisely was it argued that the displacement of caucasians by Black Africans in Europe is desirable? I've seen Attai say that an INCREASE in the Black population might be good for Europe. He has even speculated that in the future--and who knows what the future holds---Blacks and other peoples of color could even become a majority. I don't recall Attai or anyone else saying that it is desirable that there be a "complete replacement of White Europeans" by Blacks.
Is this perhaps a non-issue bred by paranoia?

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#1671 Dec 31, 2012
Savant wrote:
<quoted text>
No I did not say that i did a seminar on ending whiteness. i said that while doing a lecture at Duquesne Univeristy last month I encountered some WHITE students who were talking about ending whieness--one blonde lady even using the words "killing" whiteness.
As for your posts you show no signs of having a clue to the ways notions of race, and especially whiteness is used in areas like Critical Race Studies or Cultural Studies. And hence you can have no notion of what may be meant by ending whiteness or (for ossme writers)"blackneness "
Again, I don't claim expertise in these areas either. But i at least read enough of the literature to what what folk are talking about.
Still, I can tell you that many people in Philosophy (my area)regard race either as a social creation, or a bogus concept. Most seem not to buy into the idea of race as a creation of nature. And neither to most scientists in areas like genetics.
OK, that's how I remembered it; I might be wrong.

So can I ask you a question???(You don't like me to assume, you know).

Why did that "blonde lady" want to "kill whiteness" (as she explained)?

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#1672 Dec 31, 2012
Savant wrote:
<quoted text>
No I did not say that i did a seminar on ending whiteness. i said that while doing a lecture at Duquesne Univeristy last month I encountered some WHITE students who were talking about ending whieness--one blonde lady even using the words "killing" whiteness.
As for your posts you show no signs of having a clue to the ways notions of race, and especially whiteness is used in areas like Critical Race Studies or Cultural Studies. And hence you can have no notion of what may be meant by ending whiteness or (for ossme writers)"blackneness "
Again, I don't claim expertise in these areas either. But i at least read enough of the literature to what what folk are talking about.
Still, I can tell you that many people in Philosophy (my area)regard race either as a social creation, or a bogus concept. Most seem not to buy into the idea of race as a creation of nature. And neither to most scientists in areas like genetics.
"people in Philosophy" is a social construct itself. That's something you can admit. Even "people in anthropology" is a social construct. I've heard from Ph.D's in anthropology who say that hires are politically determined.

Many people have been kept out the universities because they don't tow the line.

You all have done your march through the institutions. You are the one with privilege. You all have cultural hegemony. How does it feel?

“Yes WE Can! Yes we Will!”

Level 8

Since: Jul 07

Baltimore, Md.

#1673 Jan 1, 2013
Walter Henrickson wrote:
<quoted text>
"people in Philosophy" is a social construct itself. That's something you can admit. Even "people in anthropology" is a social construct. I've heard from Ph.D's in anthropology who say that hires are politically determined.
Many people have been kept out the universities because they don't tow the line.
You all have done your march through the institutions. You are the one with privilege. You all have cultural hegemony. How does it feel?
People have been most commonly kept out of the universities due to inequities along the lines of race, gender and class.
Also, there seems to be an error which even some scholars are guillty of. To claim that something is a social creation or construct---John McClendon prefers to speak of race as a "social category"---is not to claim that it isn't real, or does not exist.
But it amounts to differently viewing the nature of that reality. Aristotle thought slavery to be a creation of nature. He was wrong, but slavery obviously existed just the same.
Many supporters of race and class inequalities tend to believe race and class are creations of nature. They are wrong, but race and class obviously exists.
When people in the area of Critical Race theory (and other areas) claim that the notion of race as "natural" is basically an essentialist ideological mystification, they don't mean that race does not exist. It certain does exist since humand beings, at certain historical junctures, have created it. But it's not a creation of nature.
Similarly, when scientists argue that at least on a biological or, let's say genetic basis, there are no NATURAL racial divisions among human beings, they do not infer from that that race is non-existent. For they are not so stupid as to be unaware of the socio-historical realities of race and racism which has brought such immense suffering and death to humanity.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
BM: Is this the only thing you can offer a woma... 1 min Got_Rope 1
more white men should become cuckold (Jul '14) 2 min Jrutt 252
Black "Viking" wins world Strongest Man contest! 3 min Yisraelite Suprem... 21
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min Bob53 1,564,873
Women: What is more important to you? 6 min Yisraelite Suprem... 3
Black women who fantasize about being a slave f... 8 min Rich stars of the... 20
Hahaha: Black Israelites the ultimate scum of t... 8 min Yisraelite Suprem... 3
Can Blacks Be Impartial And Trusted Enough To ... 1 hr Y do whites wrink... 69
Dan Snow: OJ is still so handsome. 1 hr MUH DIK 40
Why Are White People So Obsessed with O.J. Simp... 3 hr The Laughing Axe 121
News Anti-racist author Tim Wise: White America desp... 4 hr Dudley 817
More from around the web