the moors were black africans not ara...

“I have a brain,I try to use it”

Since: Jan 14

<3London<3 <3Denmark<3

#21369 Jan 27, 2014
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
no "half African" would ever refer to a African as a "monkey"
Well I did
dreamhunk

Calgary, Canada

#21370 Jan 27, 2014
Blackamoor found in old dictionary
FYI Fun Fact: ETHIOPIAN a Fancy Name for Negro, Bantu & Blackamoor! Old & New Webster's Dictionary


http://www.thefreedictionary.com/blackamoor
vs racist wiki

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/blackamoor
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackamoors
dreamhunk

Calgary, Canada

#21371 Jan 27, 2014
TheKingIam wrote:
<quoted text>
Well I did
WORLD BANKER MAKES STUNNING CONFESSION
dreamhunk

Calgary, Canada

#21372 Jan 27, 2014
TheKingIam wrote:
<quoted text>
Well I did
just so you know I linked this entire form on YouTube so people can see it and read it.

Ish Tov
Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#21374 Jan 27, 2014
dreamhunk wrote:
An ancient European hunter-gatherer man had dark skin and blue eyes, a new genetic analysis has revealed.
The analysis of the man, who lived in modern-day Spain only about 7,000 years ago, shows light-skin genes in Europeans evolved much more recently than previously thought.
The findings, which were detailed Sunday in the journal Nature, also hint that light skin evolved not to adjust to the lower-light conditions in Europe compared with Africa, but instead to the new diet that emerged after the agricultural revolution, said study co-author Carles Lalueza-Fox, a paleogenomics researcher at Pompeu Fabra University in Spain.
Sunlight changes
Many scientists have believed that lighter skin gradually arose in
It's not that simple. The latest light-skin gene accompanied blue eyes... plus, we know of light-skin genes far older than that.
How dark was this individual?

This raises questions more than it gives us any answers.

Ish Tov
Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#21375 Jan 27, 2014
dreamhunk wrote:
Europeans starting around 40,000 years ago, soon after people left tropical Africa for Europe's higher latitudes. The hunter-gatherer's dark skin pushes this date forward to only 7,000 years ago, suggesting that at least some humans lived considerably longer than thought in Europe before losing the dark pigmentation that evolved under Africa's sun.
'For most of their evolutionary history, Europeans were not what many people today would call Caucasian.'
"It was assumed that the lighter skin was something needed in high latitudes, to synthesize vitamin D in places where UV light is lower than in the tropics," Lalueza-Fox told LiveScience.
Scientists had assumed this was true because people need vitamin D for healthy bones, and can synthesize it in the skin with energy from the sun's UV rays, but darker skin, like that of the hunter-gatherer man, prevents UV-ray absorption.
But the new discovery shows that latitude alone didn't drive the evolution of Europeans' light skin. If it had, light skin would have become widespread in Europeans millennia earlier, Lalueza-Fox said.
Mysterious find
In 2006, hikers discovered two male skeletons buried in a labyrinthine cave known as La Braa-Arintero, in the Cantabrian Mountains of Spain.[Images of the Ancient Skeletons]
At first, officials thought the skeletons may have been recent murder victims. But then, an analysis revealed the skeletons were about 7,000 years old, and had no signs of trauma. The bodies were covered with red soil, characteristic of Paleolithic burial sites, Lalueza-Fox said.
At the time of the discovery, genetic techniques weren't advanced enough to analyze the skeletons. Several years later, the team revisited the skeletons and extracted DNA from a molar tooth in one skeleton.(The other skeleton had been sitting in water for millennia, so his DNA was more degraded, Lalueza-Fox said.)
Blue eyes, dark skin
The new analysis of that DNA now shows the man had the gene mutation for blue eyes, but not the European mutations for lighter skin.
The DNA also shows that the man was more closely related to modern-day northern Europeans than to southern Europeans.
The discovery may explain why baby blues are more common in Scandinavia. It's been thought that poor conditions in northern Europe delayed the agricultural revolution there, so Scandinavians may have more genetic traces of their hunter-gatherer past including a random blue-eye mutation that emerged in the small population of ancient hunter-gatherers, Lalueza-Fox said.
Skin changes
The finding implies that for most of their evolutionary history, Europeans were not what many people today would call 'Caucasian', said Guido Barbujani, president of the Associazione Genetica Italiana in Ferrara, Italy, who was not involved in the study.
Instead, "what seems likely, then, is that the dietary changes accompanying the so-called Neolithic revolution, or the transition from food collection to food production, might have caused, or contributed to cause, this change," Barbujani said.
In the food-production theory, the cereal-rich diet of Neolithic farmers lacked vitamin D, so Europeans rapidly lost their dark-skin pigmentation only once they switched to agriculture, because it was only at that point that they had to synthesize vitamin D from the sun more readily.
http://www.foxnews.com/science/2014/01/26/700...
Yet the light-skinned genes are found older than the age of this specimen.

The use of the term “Caucasian” does not depend on skin color. It is used for people who are quite dark. It is based on skeletal morphology more than color.

There will be more study on this and we'll find out why the anomaly...

“DANGER!!”

Level 8

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#21376 Jan 27, 2014
CuloHecho wrote:
Your post is further proof that the Spaniards are ashamed of their past, particularly during the 700+ years of Islamic Moorish occupation in Al Andalus.
The Moors can never ever be black skinned or [email protected] (a racially charged word coined in 15C by Iberians for African slaves or servants) only dark skinned (moreno) because the shame would be too great to bear.
CHUPA ME LA VERGA, PINCHE MAYATE CHANGA.

From your mouth to my áss, BÍTCH.

There is absolutely ZERO autosomal DNA evidence of ANY of your babosiadas, mete te lo donde menos te cabe, TINTA JODACHANGOS.

Nothing of what you said has even the slightest resemblance to reality, BÍTCH, and there is absolutely ZERO chance of you EVER being able to provide ANY legitimate and cogent proof to ANY of your laughable Jïggadïbøø búllshít.

“DANGER!!”

Level 8

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#21377 Jan 27, 2014
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
Next you started the "ape thing" originally. Remember.
lol....you foolishly assume because a person respects African history they must be black.You're a liar. no "half African" would ever refer to a African as a "monkey" Don't start slinging crap around...it might just hit you in the face. NO there's nothing funny about pink monkeys with long noses & no lips.
HAH!!!

Autochthanous Maghribíyan Berber Africans refer to you SSA's as "monkeys" all the time, FÓÓL.

“DANGER!!”

Level 8

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#21378 Jan 27, 2014
trollslobber wrote:
THE AFRICAN MOORS IN SPAIN
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
___
the man, the Moorish expert, racists hate
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
HAH!!!

Your laughable Jïggadïbøø YouTube monkey-boy talking head came up with some 18th century fantasy Orientalist artwork and he has made the rest of you monkey-brained Jïggadïdbøø føøls believe that there some sort of truth to his búllshít, DÜMB ÄSS.

THERE ISN'T, and you will NEVER be able to provide any, FÓÓL.

“DANGER!!”

Level 8

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#21379 Jan 27, 2014
dreamhunk wrote:
An ancient European hunter-gatherer man had dark skin and blue eyes, a new genetic analysis has revealed.
The analysis of the man, who lived in modern-day Spain only about 7,000 years ago, shows light-skin genes in Europeans evolved much more recently than previously thought.
The findings, which were detailed Sunday in the journal Nature, also hint that light skin evolved not to adjust to the lower-light conditions in Europe compared with Africa, but instead to the new diet that emerged after the agricultural revolution, said study co-author Carles Lalueza-Fox, a paleogenomics researcher at Pompeu Fabra University in Spain.
Sunlight changes
Many scientists have believed that lighter skin gradually arose in
HAH!!!

YOU ARE JUST ANOTHER TYPICAL JÏGGADÏBØØ MØRØN, FÓÓL.

There is no such anthropological analysis that would actually agree with you , FÓÓL.

You have MISREPRESENTED, MISREAD, AND MISINTERPRETED ANY AND ALL LEGITIMATE ANTHROPOLOGICAL REPORTS, FÓÓL.

It doesn't matter WHAT shade of skin that ~some~ early Caucasians had because they were nonetheless STILL Caucasians, and even today you can still find dark skinned Caucasians, even dark ones with light colored eyes.

Your statement is utterly pointless and stunningly ignorant.

“DANGER!!”

Level 8

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#21380 Jan 27, 2014
dreamhunk wrote:
Europeans starting around 40,000 years ago, soon after people left tropical Africa for Europe's higher latitudes. The hunter-gatherer's dark skin pushes this date forward to only 7,000 years ago, suggesting that at least some humans lived considerably longer than thought in Europe before losing the dark pigmentation that evolved under Africa's sun.
'For most of their evolutionary history, Europeans were not what many people today would call Caucasian.'
"It was assumed that the lighter skin was something needed in high latitudes, to synthesize vitamin D in places where UV light is lower than in the tropics," Lalueza-Fox told LiveScience.
Scientists had assumed this was true because people need vitamin D for healthy bones, and can synthesize it in the skin with energy from the sun's UV rays, but darker skin, like that of the hunter-gatherer man, prevents UV-ray absorption.
But the new discovery shows that latitude alone didn't drive the evolution of Europeans' light skin. If it had, light skin would have become widespread in Europeans millennia earlier, Lalueza-Fox said.
Mysterious find
In 2006, hikers discovered two male skeletons buried in a labyrinthine cave known as La Braa-Arintero, in the Cantabrian Mountains of Spain.[Images of the Ancient Skeletons]
At first, officials thought the skeletons may have been recent murder victims. But then, an analysis revealed the skeletons were about 7,000 years old, and had no signs of trauma. The bodies were covered with red soil, characteristic of Paleolithic burial sites, Lalueza-Fox said.
At the time of the discovery, genetic techniques weren't advanced enough to analyze the skeletons. Several years later, the team revisited the skeletons and extracted DNA from a molar tooth in one skeleton.(The other skeleton had been sitting in water for millennia, so his DNA was more degraded, Lalueza-Fox said.)
Blue eyes, dark skin
The new analysis of that DNA now shows the man had the gene mutation for blue eyes, but not the European mutations for lighter skin.
The DNA also shows that the man was more closely related to modern-day northern Europeans than to southern Europeans.
The discovery may explain why baby blues are more common in Scandinavia. It's been thought that poor conditions in northern Europe delayed the agricultural revolution there, so Scandinavians may have more genetic traces of their hunter-gatherer past including a random blue-eye mutation that emerged in the small population of ancient hunter-gatherers, Lalueza-Fox said.
Skin changes
The finding implies that for most of their evolutionary history, Europeans were not what many people today would call 'Caucasian', said Guido Barbujani, president of the Associazione Genetica Italiana in Ferrara, Italy, who was not involved in the study.
Instead, "what seems likely, then, is that the dietary changes accompanying the so-called Neolithic revolution, or the transition from food collection to food production, might have caused, or contributed to cause, this change," Barbujani said.
In the food-production theory, the cereal-rich diet of Neolithic farmers lacked vitamin D, so Europeans rapidly lost their dark-skin pigmentation only once they switched to agriculture, because it was only at that point that they had to synthesize vitamin D from the sun more readily.
http://www.foxnews.com/science/2014/01/26/700...
HAH!!!

FROM YOUR MOUTH TO MY ÁSS...

your búllshít rhetoric has no place in any legitimate discussion, here.

Ish Tov
Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#21381 Jan 27, 2014
What is revealed here is that the racist obsessionism of these Afronazis centers on color. If they can believe that this specimen was as dark as an African, then he's BLACK by golly and suddenly the whole world is black.

LOL!!!

Notice how these nudniks don't even grasp that the word "Caucasian" is used to describe people of a wide variety of colors. They think it means blonde blue-eyed Nordics, lol.

Afronazis: clueless cultists.

“DANGER!!”

Level 8

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#21382 Jan 27, 2014
dreamhunk wrote:
Blackamoor found in old dictionary
FYI Fun Fact: ETHIOPIAN a Fancy Name for Negro, Bantu & Blackamoor! Old & New Webster's Dictionary
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =5mVoZjw9Y8UXX
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/blackamoor
vs racist wiki
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/blackamoor
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackamoors
HAH!!!

No amount of old and still ignorant erroneous references or any ignorant misrepresentation of anything by YOU will EVER change the course of actual true history , FÓÓL, SO TAKE YOUR MONKEY-SHINES AND SHOVE THEM BACK UP YOUR IGNORANT DELUDED WISHFUL ÁSS, FÓÓL.
dreamhunk

Calgary, Canada

#21383 Jan 27, 2014
Curious Me wrote:
<quoted text>
HAH!!!
No amount of old and still ignorant erroneous references or any ignorant misrepresentation of anything by YOU will EVER change the course of actual true history , FÓÓL, SO TAKE YOUR MONKEY-SHINES AND SHOVE THEM BACK UP YOUR IGNORANT DELUDED WISHFUL ÁSS, FÓÓL.
I am linking this right here to dis credit wiki even more
Abby Martin Censored on Wikipedia: Editing Truth by Mob Rule
dreamhunk

Calgary, Canada

#21384 Jan 27, 2014
Do you think Wikipedia is racist?- Yahoo Answers
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index...

Level 5

Since: Sep 12

Kinshasa, Congo, The Democratic Republic of the

#21385 Jan 28, 2014
Ish Tov said

What is revealed here is that the racist obsessionism of these Afronazis centers on color.

Suddenly the whole world is black.

Notice how these nudniks don't even grasp that the word "Caucasian" is used to describe people of a wide variety of colors.

KiloEcho replies

Your European ancestors are the ones who were obsessed with skin color, hence the expression people of color for dark brown Africans and "yellow" Asians.

Who said that the word world is black?!!!!

-We are just stressing that the aboriginal black skinned populations of ancient Egypt, ancient Europe (the legendary Mouros of the Iberian peninsula or the Formorians of Scandinavia), Western Asia, India, South East Asia, the Americas and China, including Taiwan were erased and replaced by "white skinned" or yellow skinned" invaders.

-We just want to point at that white skin is a recent genetic mutation from brown skin. Europeans were brown skinned before that genetic mutation which happened 12 000 years ago

The most racist Europeans or Europ-descendants, like the brilliant Joseph Pomeroy Widney, M.D. D.D. LL.D (December 26, 1841 – July 4, 1938) acknowledged the presence of black skinned populations in places outside AFRICA SOUTH OF THE SAHARA where they "mysteriously disappeared" either through race mixing or during racial wars or even forced resettlements in remote or hostile areas.

“THEY (the black races) ONCE OCCUPIED A MUCH WIDER TERRITORY AND WIELDED A VASTLY GREATER INFLUENCE UPON EARTH THAN THEY DO NOW”

“They are now found chiefly in Africa; yet traces of them are to be found through the islands of Malaysia, remnants no doubt of that more numerous black population which seems to have occupied tropical Asia before the days of the Semite and the Mongol and the Brahmanic Aryan”.

“The valleys of the Ganges, the Euphrates and the Nile; and it was of the Black Races. The first Babylon seems to have been built by a [email protected] race. The earliest Egyptian civilization seems to have been [email protected] It was in the days before the Semite was known in either land”
----------
Caucasian is a racist term invented by Europeans in the 18C in order to lay false claim to civilizations founded by non-Europeans and non-Whites in North Africa, West Asia and India, to cover up thousands of years of mixing with the original dark brown skinned inhabitants of North Africa, Southern Europe, West Asia, India and the Caucasus region and to a lesser extent White slavery at the hands of non- Whites and non-Europeans.

The true Caucasians of Russia 'like the Chechens are called [email protected] of the Caucasus by Slavic Russians because of their dark features (dark hair, dark skin, dark eyes) inherited from dark brown skinned ancestors
trollslayer

Munster, IN

#21386 Jan 28, 2014
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
no "half African" would ever refer to a African as a "monkey"
TheKingIam wrote:
<quoted text>
Well I did
right....so I showed you your white monkey relatives / ancestors. now stop trolling this forum

http://www.wallpapersma.com/wallpapers/2013/0...
trollslayer

Munster, IN

#21387 Jan 28, 2014
trollslayer wrote:
THE AFRICAN MOORS IN SPAIN
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
___
the man, the Moorish expert, racists hate
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
The racist HATE Dr. Bey and that's good
African AE

Durban, South Africa

#21388 Jan 28, 2014
trollslayer wrote:
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
no "half African" would ever refer to a African as a "monkey"
<quoted text>
right....so I showed you your white monkey relatives / ancestors. now stop trolling this forum
http://www.wallpapersma.com/wallpapers/2013/0...
FINALLY Toothslayer puts up a pic of himself:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Homo_erectus_new.J...
Enough to make women faint and little kids scream!
African AE

Durban, South Africa

#21389 Jan 28, 2014
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
The racist HATE Dr. Bey and that's good
Load of AFRONAZI RUBBISH!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min Grey Ghost 1,522,942
I LOVE choco-bunnies 5 min Harrisson 25
News Black Atheists, Agnostics Are Appealing To Afri... (Nov '14) 8 min Savant 55
What African Americans really are 19 min The Power Of Mast... 28
Negro behavior in public places 21 min The Warden 22
WM is mad b/c white girls don't like him. Elli... (Jan '15) 22 min Harrisson 129
Black Women Are Finally Leaving Black Men - BWG... (Aug '16) 50 min Harrisson 20
Racists are not born, they're created 1 hr The Power Of Mast... 58
Do black men really have larger penises? (Sep '10) 2 hr BWGTOW For Life 1,495
IRBW And Their Fantasies. 3 hr Harrisson 862
BLACK MALES ARE THE MOST DELUSIONAL PEOPLE ON T... 7 hr IT IS I 72
More from around the web