the moors were black africans not ara...

“DANGER!!”

Level 8

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#17315 Sep 7, 2013
trollfool wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
name-calling is a typically troll behavior when they've been beaten.
Intelligent PPL. don't have to resort to name-calling.
SAYS YOU, mørøn.

The fact is that your ill chosen avatar sobrique has been your own never ending(and lame, I might add) bid at wholly gratuitous "NAME CALLING".

It must be that you are merely projecting because you truly are an unintelligent twerp who has never ever been able to come up with anything other than the signs of your own ineptitude.

“DANGER!!”

Level 8

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#17316 Sep 7, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
Show us the " conspiracy"..u troll
" You are mad because the E3b aka e1b1b which originates among dark brown skinned Ethiopoids of the Horn of Africa, south of the Sahara, can be found in places claimed by Euro-centrists as White lands like Europe or Caucasian lands like North Africa or Western Asia"
http://www.eupedia.com/europe/european_y-dna_ ...
http://www.thegeneticatlas.com/E1b_Y-DNA.htm
http://www.thegeneticatlas.com/mutations.htm
http://shelf3d.com/i/Haplogroup%20E1b1b%20 (Y-DNA)
http://haplogroup2.blogspot.com/2012/10/blog -...
ASKED AND ANSWERED, DÚMB ÁSS.

Now, as usual, you're just repeating your passed failures.
trollslayer

Hammond, IN

#17317 Sep 7, 2013
"The original Berbers are Black Africans of Ethiopoid type; they look no different than their genetic brothers from the Horn of Africa.

The lightest Berbers like the Kabyles, the Riffians or the Guanches have absorbed a large number of Whites; but their DNA shows that they have East African ancestors of Ethiopoid type"

-KiloEcho
___

Again.....name-calling is a typically troll behavior when they've been beaten. Intelligent PPL. don't have to resort to name-calling.

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#17318 Sep 7, 2013
Interesting that 30k yr old remains from the Maghreb are of Cro-Magnon type and have Eurasian DNA... hmmmmm... must be a Eurocentric conspiracy.

Those pesky guanches are also a Eurocentric conspiracy.

And the site of Taforalt... obviously a conspiracy by Eurocentric Nazis in denial of Africa's greatness.

A Eurocentric conspiracy of Medieval Nazis created false images of Eurasian-type Moors in Iberia.

The tricky cave apes!

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#17319 Sep 7, 2013
How tedious you Afronazis.

Of course we know that the Sahara was usually a desert, that when passage was possible, judging from the DNA, about 20,000 years ago African males moved north and mixed with the existing indigenous Eurasian population of the Maghreb.

As there were no females involved, clearly these Africans were gay pastoralists.

Still the gay pastoralist DNA is a minority in the Maghreb.

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#17320 Sep 7, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
"The original Berbers are Black Africans of Ethiopoid type; they look no different than their genetic brothers from the Horn of Africa.
The lightest Berbers like the Kabyles, the Riffians or the Guanches have absorbed a large number of Whites; but their DNA shows that they have East African ancestors of Ethiopoid type"
-KiloEcho
___
Again.....name-calling is a typically troll behavior when they've been beaten. Intelligent PPL. don't have to resort to name-calling.
Wrong, of course. The Guanches had the same DNA as the Maghreb 6000 yrs ago, of Eurasian type. They were the same people who'd been in the Maghreb since 30,000 years ago: Eurasians.

You can't twist the guanches into Africans any more than you can for the Maghreb generally for the past 30,000 years.

Or perhaps it was Eurocentric Nazis in Egypt who portrayed Berbers as Eurasians.

Afronazi liar.
trollslayer

Hammond, IN

#17321 Sep 7, 2013
Sinajuavi wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong, of course. The Guanches had the same DNA as the Maghreb 6000 yrs ago, of Eurasian type. They were the same people who'd been in the Maghreb since 30,000 years ago: Eurasians.
You can't twist the guanches into Africans any more than you can for the Maghreb generally for the past 30,000 years.
Or perhaps it was Eurocentric Nazis in Egypt who portrayed Berbers as Eurasians.
Afronazi liar.
LINKS or authority source. OR stop trolling

“Maat's my principle”

Level 9

Since: Jan 12

bamako,mali

#17322 Sep 8, 2013
Exactly !
KiloEcho

Kinshasa, Congo, The Democratic Republic of the

#17323 Sep 9, 2013
Sinajuavi said

Obviously a conspiracy by Eurocentric Nazis in denial of Africa's greatness.

A Eurocentric conspiracy of Medieval Nazis created false images of

Eurasian-type Moors in Iberia.

The tricky cave apes!

KiloEcho replies

You are right this time

There is, indeed, a mega Eurocentric conspiracy in denial of Africa's greatness

The so called White people whose homeland is in the CAVES of Central Eurasia have no ancient history to speak or even ancient writing sytem and language to boast about

Since they left their caves of Central Eurasia (somewhere in Northern Paskistan or Northeastern Afghanistan where their lost brothers the Nuristani still live as cavedwellers), the so called whites have gone from civilization to civilization.... burning, stealing, if need be, faking historical artifacts so that they can make false claim of White supremacy.

For a good reason, the so called Whites are mad because they cannot trace their origins to any land. The homeland of the Whites is one of the most garded secrets and mysteries of European history.

That is why, they keep on exploring and stealing lands from aboriginal populations. They did in India, in Europe, in Western Asia, North Africa, the Americas, South Africa and Australia.

They made countless of victims along the way: the Dravidians of India, the dark brown skinned aboriginal Elamites and Sumerians, the brown cooper skinned Pelasgians, Etruscans, Minoans, Estrucans, Iberians of Europe, Native Americans, Natives Southern Africans and Aborigines of Australia.

The so called European languages, including the English language are a mixture of all languages which Asian, African and Indian civilizations created. The latin is derived fom the Phoenician alphabet.

There is a conspiracy, I maintain, that is why the so called Whites spend so much of their lives using false media, false academia, false cinema and false academia trying to paint non Whites as inferior. They cannot stand to look at themselves that is why they spend day in day out trying to exploit non Whites

As for the conspiracy against Africans, Europe and Africa have exchange periods of brilliance and dominance across their common borders, the Mediterranean Sea and the Straights of Gibraltar.

Chapters of world history when Africans (the Moors, the Egyptians, the Carthaginians etc.) were dominant and brilliant, including in Europe have been silenced.

White slavery in Africa is a taboo. African admixture among European is downplayed or hardly acknowledged. The early Christians of Africa, many of them became Saints or even Patron Saints of European cities are not properly recognized. The Patron Saint of the Holy Roman Empire, the black skinned Saint Maurice is almost unheard of. Popes or Roman Emperors of African descent are almost never mentioned in history classes of the Western world.

The biggest conspiracy tactic is the induction of North-East and Saharan Africans into the extended Caucasian family far away from other Africans even though they have specific African genetic markers, predominantly dark brown skin color.

to be continued.
KiloEcho

Kinshasa, Congo, The Democratic Republic of the

#17324 Sep 9, 2013
Sinajuavi said

obviously a conspiracy by Eurocentric Nazis in denial of Africa's greatness.

A Eurocentric conspiracy of Medieval Nazis created false images of Eurasian-type Moors in Iberia.

KiloEcho replies

Paul Gaffarel (1843-1920), a scientist and a prolific historian of French descent wrote a wonderful passage on races and world dominance.

Several races seem to have, in turn, exercised world dominance, and been at the forefront of civilization.

The order of succession is now very difficult to determine.

However, the Black race appears to be the first.

The Malays hunted down Blacks in the islands of Polynesia; the Hindus chased them far into the interior of the Deccan and Ceylon.

Blacks are represented in Egyptian monuments and easily recognizable by the color of their skin, snub nose and slanted eyes. They were later replaced by invaders.

THE FINAL TRIUMPH OF OUR RACE (THE WHITE RACE) DATES ONLY FROM THE 16C WHEN NATIVE AMERICAN TRIBES WERE DESTROYED OR ABSORBED BY EUROPEANS.

Baldwin, John D. John Denison (1809-1883) who was a member of the prestigious American Oriental Society wrote the following:

It is now admitted that a people of the Cushite or Ethiopian race, sometimes called Hamites, were the first civilizers and builders throughout Western Asia, and they are traced, by remains of their language, their architecture, and the influence of their civilization, on both shores of the Mediterranean, in Eastern Africa and the Nile valley, in Hindustan, and in the islands of the Indian Seas.

M. Constantine de Volney, Travels through Syria and Egypt in the Years 1783-1785 (London 1787)

The Egyptian must have been real Negroes of the same species of the natives of Africa”.

In other words, the ancient Egyptians were true Negroes of the same stock as all the autochthonous people of Africa and from the datum one sees how their race, after some centuries of mixing with the blood of the Romans and Greeks, must have lost the full blackness of its original color but retained the impress of its original mold.

In the early-600s, the Spanish bishop and encyclopaedist, Isidore of Seville wrote:

The Moors have bodies black as night, while the skin of the Gauls is white.

As for the Berbers, they were described by early European and Arab anthropologists and travelers as Black people

1stt c. A.D.–“Diodorus Siculus speaks in reference to the expedition of Agathocles a Sardinian general, of three Libyan tribes on the coast of Tunisia, the Micatani and Zufoni (see Zafan ),who were nomads and the Asfodelodi, who by the color of their skin resembled the ETHIOPIANS”, p. 50 The Mediterranean Race Book XX, 38, 57 Guiseppe Sergi, 1901. The Micatani were also called Ukutameni and Khethim by Josephus. In later writings they are called Ketama Berbers. The name Maketa or Imakitan remains a name for the eastern branches of the Tuareg.

6th A.D.– Procopius in his History of the Wars book IV contrasting the Germanic Vandals who had settled in North Africa with the Moors claimed the Vandals were not “black skinned like the Maurusioi”. The tribes he classified as Maurusioi are those now classified as ancient Berbers, the Numidians, Masaesyle, Gaitules, Massyles and Mezikes several other “Berber” tribes then settled between Tunisia and Morocco.

Some medieval Arab writers such as al-Jahiz applied the term "blacks" to practically all peoples darker than the average Arab, and "whites" to peoples lighter than the norm:

"The blacks are more numerous than the whites.

The whites at most consist of the people of Persia, Jibal, and Khurasan, the Greeks, Slavs, Franks, and Avars, and some few others, not very numerous;

the BLACKS include the Zanj, Ethiopians, the people of Fazzan, the BERBERS, the COPTS, and Nubians, the people of Zaghawa, Marw, Sind and India, Qamar and Dabila, China, and Masin...
trollslayer

Lowell, IN

#17325 Sep 9, 2013
"
There is a conspiracy, I maintain, that is why the so called Whites spend so much of their lives using false media, false academia, false cinema and false academia trying to paint non Whites as inferior. They cannot stand to look at themselves that is why they spend day in day out trying to exploit non Whites"
-KiloEcho
___

is this untrue?
trollslayer

Lowell, IN

#17326 Sep 9, 2013
" All the early major Berber tribes including the Masmuda, Sanhaja, Ketama Zenata and Nafusa are described as dark reddish brown like the “Indi’ or as “blacks” or Ethiopians in early documents. The notion of the early Berbers as being “whites” or Caucasoid is a new and racist one related to the concept of the African “Hamite”. Certainly the original Berber-speakers were never referred to as anything but “black” or something near it until the 12th century and were otherwise considered the color of Abyssinians and other so called “Indi”.
Even the Kabyles a notoriously fair-skinned “Berber” people of North Africa are up until the 19th century described as “brown” "apart from a few clans".(See quotes below).

The knowledge that Europeans were changing the complexion literally and figuratively of North Africa up until the 19th century has disappeared from modern European histories. Most know about the large part played by sub-saharan black slaves in the making of modern North Africa and Arabia while the white slave trade which was in fact dominant trade in North Africa until the fall of Constantinople (Istanbul in Turkey) in the 15th century had been largely ignored in historical writings of the 20th.

Yet it was only a few centuries ago that Europeans visiting North Africa commenting on the fact that,“on almost every street of the cities of Barbary, Europeans could be seen harnessed to carts like draught horses or selling water from jars loaded on the backs of donkeys”.

1809 Commentary on those called “Moors” by an early 19th century observer:“They carry the Christian captives about the desert to the different markets to sell them for they soon discover that their habits of life render them unserviceable , or very inferior to the black slaves of Timbuktoo.“ from An Account of the Empire of Marocco, by J. G. Jackson published 1809 and 1814.

2003 -“From 1500 to 1650 when trans-Atlantic slaving was still in its infancy more Europeans were taken to Barbary than black African slaves to the Americas. See, Robert Davis Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters: White Slavery in the Mediterranean, the Barbary Coast, and Italy, 1500-1800, MacMillan Publishers, published 2003. "
_____

Is all this untrue? lets see a link
Jeff

Framingham, MA

#17327 Sep 9, 2013
KiloEcho wrote:
You are right this time
There is, indeed, a mega Eurocentric conspiracy in denial of Africa's greatness
The so called White people whose homeland is in the CAVES of Central Eurasia have no ancient history to speak or even ancient writing sytem and language to boast about
Since they left their caves of Central Eurasia (somewhere in Northern Paskistan or Northeastern artifacts so that they can make false claim of White supremacy.
For a good reason, the so called Whites are mad because they cannot trace their origins to any land. The homeland of the Whites is one of the most garded secrets and mysteries of European history.
That is why, they keep on exploring and stealing lands from aboriginal populations. They did in India, in Europe, in Western Asia, North Africa, the Americas, South Africa and Australia.
They made countless of victims along the way: the Dravidians of India, the dark brown skinned aboriginal Elamites and Sumerians, the brown cooper skinned Pelasgians, Etruscans, Minoans, Estrucans, Iberians of Europe, Native Americans, Natives Southern Africans and Aborigines of Australia.anean Sea and the Straights of Gibraltar.
Chapters of world history when Africans (the Moors, the Egyptians, the Carthaginians etc.) were dominant and brilliant, including in Europe have been silenced.
of the Western world.
The biggest conspiracy tactic is the induction of North-East and Saharan Africans into the extended color.
to be continued.
Lying "motts" or "KiloEcho" or 'becky' or whatever other FAKE username you post under next in your obsession to claim Europeans as 'not white'. White people homelands have always been in Europe. Europe is the home region of those white people your stupdiass 'hates' but who you can't stop trying to claim. Europe is a NONE tropical region with Low UV Radiation where white skin was more cohesive for survival over your black skin, dumbass. Pelasgians, Etruscans, Minoans, Estrucans, Iberians of Europe etc were light skinned Europeans similar to modern Europeans both genetically and phenotypically, stupidass. In fact many modern Europeans still carry the haplogroups of their prehistoric and ancient European ancestors. The European languages are Indo-European in origins, dumbass, they have no connection to Asian or African languages, you linguistically challenged buffoon. Modern Europeans also carry native Prehistoric European haplogroups like Haplotype I, a marker that is NOT common among you blacks but very common still among Europeans, nor is this marker common among people in in Asia (Northern Pakistan, Afghanistan). Nuristani cluster away from Europeans, you identity confused reject.

"The Nuristani people's closest relation is to the Kalash people. Furthermore, they have very little genetic relation to neighbouring ethnic groups like Pashtuns and Kashmiris. This is because they have always remained isolated in the mountains which has led them to become a genetically isolated population."
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons...

Christianity started in the Middle East, so early Christians were Middle Eastern people similar to Middle Eastern people today, Christianity spread into Europe and Africa FROM the Middle East. Africans were just as much PAGANS as all the others. Nubians were making artwork of Mary and Jesus as light skinned but again you don't want to address that because it exposes your Afrocentric lies.

There were NO Africans in the Americas prior to Columbus era. The Americas had nothing to do with Africans, you self hating idiot. "Moors" did not hold a racial identity, stupid, it was originally meant towards North African Berbers, later on it was applied towards mostly Muslims of ANY COLOR and race including many who were white, black, brown, mixed and everything in between, moron. In other words included many Moors who were not 'black'.
http://warfare.totalh.net/Cantiga/Cantigas_de...
Jeff

Framingham, MA

#17328 Sep 9, 2013
KiloEcho wrote:
Paul Gaffarel (1843-1920), a scientist and a prolific historian of French descent wrote a wonderful passage on races and world dominance.
Several races seem to have, in turn, exercised world dominance, and been at the forefront of civilization.
The order of succession is now very difficult to determine.
However, thyclopaedist, Isidore of Seville wrote:
The Moors have bodies black as night, while the skin of the Gauls is white.
As for the Berbers, they were described by early European and Arab anthropologists and travelers as Black people
1stt c. A.D.–“Diodorus Siculus speaks in reference to the expedition of Agathocles a Sardinian general, of three Libyan tribes on the coast of Tunisia, the Micatani and Zufoni (see Zafan ),who were nomads and the Asfodelodi, who by the color of their skin resembled the ETHIOPIANS”, p. 50 The Mediterranean Race Book XX, 38, 57 Guiseppe Sergi, 1901. The Micatani were also called Ukutameni and Khethim by Josephus. In later writings they are called Ketama Berbers. The name Maketa or Imakitan remains a name for the eastern branches of the Tuareg.
6th A.D.– Procopius in his History of the Wars book IV contrasting the Germanic Vandals who had settled in North Africa with the Moors claimed the Vandals were not “black skinned like the Maurusioi”. The tribes he classified as Maurusioi are those now classified as ancient Berbers, the Numidians, Masaesyle, Gaitules, Massyles and Mezikes several other “Berber” tribes then settled between Tunisia and Morocco.
Some medieval Arab writers such as al-Jahiz applied the term "blacks" to practically all peoples darker than the average Arab, and "whites" to peoples lighter than the norm:
"The blacks are more numerous than the whites.
The whites at most consist of the people of Persia, Jibal, and Khurasan, the Greeks, Slavs, Franks, and Avars, and some few others, not very numerous;
the BLACKS include the Zanj, Ethiopians, the people of Fazzan, the BERBERS, the COPTS, and Nubians, the people of Zaghawa, Marw, Sind and India, Qamar and Dabila, China, and Masin...
There were NO Africans in the Americas prior to Columbus era. The Americas had nothing to do with Africans NOR with any Europeans or 'Muslim Moors' or Middle Eastern people.
"People with skulls resembling Paleo-Indians were present in Asia around 20,000 years ago, and lacking the technology to cross the Pacific Ocean by boat, they probably crossed the land bridge to Alaska several thousand years before the Siberians, said study co-author Mark Hubbe of the Universidade de S?o Paulo."
http://www.livescience.com/3976-skulls-south-...

"All "African" Y data in the New World that I have seen is consistent with ---> POST <--- European contact rather then the fanciful leap made by others." ~ Underhill, P. A

"Moors" did not hold a racial identity, stupid, it was originally meant towards North African Berbers, later on it was applied towards mostly Muslims of ANY COLOR and race including many who were white, black, brown, mixed and everything in between, moron. In other words included many Moors who were not 'black'.
http://warfare.totalh.net/Cantiga/Cantigas_de...
http://warfare.totalh.net/Cantiga/Cantigas_de...

"Black and White Moors: "The Beydanes, also known as White Moors, are the ruling caste in Mauritania. They are Arab Berber tribesmen whose ancestors established control in the seventeenth century. The Haratin, also known as Black Moors, are the descendants of black West Africans conquered and enslaved by the Beydanes centuries ago." from the New Yorker story, A Slave in New York, about a former slave who escaped in 1978, came to live in America and now works with the American Anti-Slavery Group.
http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2000/01/24/2...

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#17330 Sep 9, 2013
These idiots hate sources from later than 1920 apparently. "Hamitic race"? LOL!!!

This crap is the stuff of a pseudo-mystical cult, not real science and history.

Befuddled Afronazi nitwits!

“DANGER!!”

Level 8

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#17331 Sep 9, 2013
trollmoron wrote:
"The original Berbers are Black Africans of Ethiopoid type; they look no different than their genetic brothers from the Horn of Africa.
The lightest Berbers like the Kabyles, the Riffians or the Guanches have absorbed a large number of Whites; but their DNA shows that they have East African ancestors of Ethiopoid type"
-CuloHecho
___
Again.....name-calling is a typically troll behavior when they've been beaten. Intelligent PPL. don't have to resort to name-calling.
WOW, FØØL!!!

Where's your reference "LINK" for that?

You stúpidly like to make your empty brag about how you always back your búllshít opinions with genuine búllshít "links".

Please entertain us with whatever pathetic Jíggadibøø Blog links you might 'think' help to lend legitimate support to any of your asinine opinions.

Only the Tuareg have a vague more cultural connection to the East African "Ethiopid" Beija People.

The original and true Berbers of the Maghrib have NO such connection to Ethiopids.

•••

BTW, DÚMB ÁSS, "resort to" is a phrase that implies that there are no other options available to those of us who have repeatedly demonstrated that we can out think your pathetic rhetoric at all times which is what we have always done, FÓÓL.

For the record, we have ALWAYS been given to referring to you, and yours, in any number of words of eviscerative invective.

It's NOT like we ever found ourselves to be without other options, but only a føøl like you would not be able to comprehend that any such 'expletive un-deleted' words of disparagement were merely appropriate accompaniment to our well substantiated condemnation of all that you find so very dear to your delusional fantasies.

In short,

since you are not right but you are wrong

and you are wrong but NOT in a nice way,

we have resorted in kind by referring to both you AND your cockamamie opinions in a VERY 'un-nice' way, from the very beginning.

Level 5

Since: Sep 12

Kinshasa, Congo, The Democratic Republic of the

#17332 Sep 10, 2013
Curious Me said

Only the Tuareg have a vague more cultural connection to the East African "Ethiopid" Beija People.

The original and true Berbers of the Maghrib have NO such connection to Ethiopids.

KiloEcho replies

Typical Euro-centric ignorance and arrogance.

The Maghreb and the whole of North Africa were originally Black Lands.

The first inhabitants were of Ethiopoid type. They migrated there before anyone else and passed down their to their descendents including their mixed offspring with Eurasians, Eurasian females ,in particular.

The true and original Berbers are from the Horn of Africa; there is a whole region called Berbera in Somalia.

The original and true Berbers of North Africa looked no different than their genetic brothers from the Horn of Africa aka Horners or Ethiopoids.

Europoid looking Berbers are light skinned mulattoes, quadroons, octoroons and quintroons with varying levels of black "Ethiopoid" admixture.

On their father side, their black ancestors were of Ethipoid type. On their mother side, their ancestors came from Eurasia.

There are still a large number unmixed Berbers in North Africa and they are Ethiopoid carriers of the E3b haplogroup. They mostly live in rural areas and southern regions.

http://mbe.oxfordjournals.org/content/24/6/13...

Locating the Origin of Haplogroup E-M78

An eastern African origin for this haplogroup was hypothesized on the basis of the exclusive presence in that area of a putative ancestral 12-repeat allele at the DYS392 microsatellite, found in association with E-M78 chromosomes (Semino et al. 2004).

An eastern African origin for haplogroup E-M78 was also hypothesized on the basis of the frequency distribution and microsatellite diversity (Cruciani et al. 2004)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_history_...

Haplogroup E is the most prevalent haplogroup amongst the Berbers accounting for up to 87 percent of Y-chromosomes among some Berber populations.

Haplogroup E is thought to have emerged in East-Africa and would have later dispersed into North Africa and Eurasia.

The major sub-clades of haplogroup E found amongst Berbers belong to E1b1b1 which is believed to have emerged in East Africa.

Common subclades include, E1b1b1a, E1b1b1b and E1b1b1

E1b1b1b is distributed along a west-to-east cline with frequencies which can reach as high as 80 percent in Northwest Africa.

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#17333 Sep 10, 2013
KiloEcho wrote:
Sinajuavi said
Obviously a conspiracy by Eurocentric Nazis in denial of Africa's greatness.
A Eurocentric conspiracy of Medieval Nazis created false images of
Eurasian-type Moors in Iberia.
The tricky cave apes!
KiloEcho replies
You are right this time
There is, indeed, a mega Eurocentric conspiracy in denial of Africa's greatness
The so called White people whose homeland is in the CAVES of Central Eurasia have no ancient history to speak or even ancient writing sytem and language to boast about
Since they left their caves of Central Eurasia (somewhere in Northern Paskistan or Northeastern Afghanistan where their lost brothers the Nuristani still live as cavedwellers), the so called whites have gone from civilization to civilization.... burning, stealing, if need be, faking historical artifacts so that they can make false claim of White supremacy.
For a good reason, the so called Whites are mad because they cannot trace their origins to any land. The homeland of the Whites is one of the most garded secrets and mysteries of European history.
That is why, they keep on exploring and stealing lands from aboriginal populations. They did in India, in Europe, in Western Asia, North Africa, the Americas, South Africa and Australia.
They made countless of victims along the way: the Dravidians of India, the dark brown skinned aboriginal Elamites and Sumerians, the brown cooper skinned Pelasgians, Etruscans, Minoans, Estrucans, Iberians of Europe, Native Americans, Natives Southern Africans and Aborigines of Australia.
The so called European languages, including the English language are a mixture of all languages which Asian, African and Indian civilizations created. The latin is derived fom the Phoenician alphabet.
There is a conspiracy, I maintain, that is why the so called Whites spend so much of their lives using false media, false academia, false cinema and false academia trying to paint non Whites as inferior. They cannot stand to look at themselves that is why they spend day in day out trying to exploit non Whites
As for the conspiracy against Africans, Europe and Africa have exchange periods of brilliance and dominance across their common borders, the Mediterranean Sea and the Straights of Gibraltar.
Chapters of world history when Africans (the Moors, the Egyptians, the Carthaginians etc.) were dominant and brilliant, including in Europe have been silenced.
White slavery in Africa is a taboo. African admixture among European is downplayed or hardly acknowledged. The early Christians of Africa, many of them became Saints or even Patron Saints of European cities are not properly recognized. The Patron Saint of the Holy Roman Empire, the black skinned Saint Maurice is almost unheard of. Popes or Roman Emperors of African descent are almost never mentioned in history classes of the Western world.
The biggest conspiracy tactic is the induction of North-East and Saharan Africans into the extended Caucasian family far away from other Africans even though they have specific African genetic markers, predominantly dark brown skin color.
to be continued.
This racism is unacceptable, boy. In person I would silence you.

“Whites”, lol. Their origin is as known as that of anyone else. With DNA analysis we've been able to trace their origins.

The oldest writing system in the world is that of SE Europe, Vinca, boy.

They did not come out of Central Asian caves, boy.

I'll enjoy beating the racism out of you, boy.

LOL at your ignorance, boy!

Latin did not come from Phoenician, you idiot. Phoenician is Semitic.

The people of the Maghreb have mostly Eurasian DNA, boy. You don't know much about genetics or anthropology or much else.

Your racism will not stand.

Now shut your goddam f'ing mouth, boy.
maid angela

Peterborough, UK

#17334 Sep 10, 2013
I fail to see the importance of the colour of someones skin. We know that the moors were generally dark skinned as they came from a climate where there was a lot of sun. So what?

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#17335 Sep 10, 2013
There's a lot of sun in Spain. Southern Spain is not much different from coastal Morocco, climatically.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min RealDave 1,405,680
News Black Women Denied Entry Into Popular London Cl... (Sep '15) 3 min Dan Snow 10
Why Do Black People Look So Ugly Compared To Al... (Aug '15) 7 min The Truth 159
Time for Reparations 17 min Truth 32
Jesus had the skin of Burnt Brass (Mar '11) 18 min HOI 400
black men need to go away and accept that white... (Nov '15) 29 min Queen 33
Black Inventions That Whites Take Credit For (Nov '07) 32 min real expert 974
What race are Somalis? (Aug '07) 6 hr Moses 14,549
BM Thwarts White Rapist & Robber. 8 hr melissa__ 26
More from around the web