Jeff

Framingham, MA

#17307 Sep 6, 2013
KiloEcho wrote:
Curious Me, what kind of a meltdown is this?
Calling me all those names does not make you look good, seriously?!!!!
You don't seem to understand that Africans have specific genetic markers, like the E haplogroup and its subclades.
All indigenous carry the E haplogroup and one of its subclades.
Outside Africa, the presence of E and its haplogroup is considered African admixture whether you like it or not.
Pygmoid, Capoid, Congoid, Nilotid, Sudanid and Ethiopoid, we are all indigenous Africans.
You are mad because the E3b aka e1b1b which originates among dark brown skinned Ethiopoids of the Horn of Africa, south of the Sahara, can be found in places claimed by Euro-centrists as White lands like Europe or Caucasian lands like North Africa or Western Asia
http://www.eupedia.com/europe/european_y-dna_...
http://www.thegeneticatlas.com/E1b_Y-DNA.htm
http://www.thegeneticatlas.com/mutations.htm
http://shelf3d.com/i/Haplogroup%20E1b1b%20 (Y-DNA)
http://haplogroup2.blogspot.com/2012/10/blog-...
Europeans have intermixed with dark brown skinned North-East and Saharan Africans for a very long period of time, including in Europe in Southern Greece and Italiy, in particular.
As a cover up for this "miscegenation", they inducted North-East and Saharan Africans into the extended Caucasian family far away from the Congoid and other Black Africans like the Nilotid or Capoid.
Your lack of understanding genetics is astonishing and exposes what an ignorant buffoon you truly are. There never were any "dark brown skinned North-East and Saharan Africans" in Europe for Europeans to intermix with, you idiot, including in Southern Greece and Italy, cause , cause "North-East and Saharan Africans" have historically been an anomaly in through out Europe, that is why Europeans, including Italians and Southern Greece do not have Sub Saharan African admixture, dumbass. The majority of e1b1b in Europe is the Eurasian EV13 marker that did NOT arise among you Sub Saharan types and that is why Sub Saharan Africans do not carry, stupid. The Neolithics that Europeans mixed with were mostly Eurasians from the Near East, not Sub Saharan Africans. In fact Neolithic farmers were mainly of Haplogroup G carriers mixed in with carriers of Haplogroups J, EV13, T, etc. tests conducted on prehistoric Neolithic remains in Europe and the Middle East show them to be predominately Haplogroup G carriers a marker NOT common among you Sub Saharan African types.

"Sudies of the ancient Y-DNA from the earlier Neolithic cave burials of Cardium pottery culture men shows they were mainly haplogroup G2a. These 'Neolithic lineages' accounted for 22% of the total European Y chromosome gene pool, and were predominantly found in Southern Europe (Greece, Italy, southeastern Bulgaria, southeastern Iberia)."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neolithic_Europe...

"Moors" did not hold a racial identity, stupid, it was originally meant towards North African Berbers, later on it was applied towards mostly Muslims of ANY COLOR and race including many who were white, black, brown, mixed and everything in between, moron. In other words included many Moors who were not 'black'.
http://warfare.totalh.net/Cantiga/Cantigas_de...
http://warfare.totalh.net/Cantiga/Cantigas_de...

That fact that you stupidly claim 'E'Y-Hg Congoids are blood kin to the 'B'Y-Hg Pygmoids and also to the 'A'Y-Hg Capoids proves how little you understand genetics. Its hilarious,you Afrocentrics run around claiming how diverse Africa is, and then in the next breath you claim that you are "All the Same" and "related". I suggest you take a English lesson course because you clearly have no understanding of what "diverse" means...I'll give you a hint: its the opposite of "same".

Level 5

Since: Sep 12

Congo, The Democratic Republic of the

#17308 Sep 6, 2013
Sinajuavi said

There was not much slavery of whites by blacks, compared of by Berbers, Arabs and Turks.

North Africans, who were many of the saints you discuss, were not black mostly. They were Berbers

KiloEcho replies

Truth hurts, doesn't it?

How many times do we have to tell you that today's Berbers are like the Colored of South Africa or the Creoles of the Americas with skin color ranging from milk white to dark brown.

after at least a thousand years of mixing with White settlers (Vandals, White invaders (Romans, Spaniards)and above all White slaves (Saqaliba, Barbary slaves, Punic slaves etc.) particularly on islands, in coastal areas, Atlas Mountains and urban cities.

The original Berbers are Black Africans of Ethiopoid type; they look no different than their genetic brothers from the Horn of Africa.

The lightest Berbers like the Kabyles, the Riffians or the Guanches have absorbed a large number of Whites; but their DNA shows that they have East African ancestors of Ethiopoid type.

There are still a large number or unmixed Berbers and they are Black people.

They mostly live in rural areas, southern regions and deep in the Sahara Desert.

Whites were, indeed, enslaved by dark brown skinned indigenous North-East and Saharan Africans not only in Africa but in Europe.

It is taboo to talk about it in Euro-centric circles.

Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#17309 Sep 6, 2013
dcool wrote:
<quoted text>
Links please !
You lying sack'o'$hit.

That's your game, ask for links, and when they're provided you pretend you didn't see them.

You are the ultimate in pseudo-intellectual cowards, boy.

And you need a link for the location of Sumer? LOL!!!

You know NOTHING, boy!!!

Come talk your crap to my face, boy, and see what happens to you.

Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#17310 Sep 6, 2013
KiloEcho wrote:
Sinajuavi said
There was not much slavery of whites by blacks, compared of by Berbers, Arabs and Turks.
North Africans, who were many of the saints you discuss, were not black mostly. They were Berbers
KiloEcho replies
Truth hurts, doesn't it?
How many times do we have to tell you that today's Berbers are like the Colored of South Africa or the Creoles of the Americas with skin color ranging from milk white to dark brown.
after at least a thousand years of mixing with White settlers (Vandals, White invaders (Romans, Spaniards)and above all White slaves (Saqaliba, Barbary slaves, Punic slaves etc.) particularly on islands, in coastal areas, Atlas Mountains and urban cities.
The original Berbers are Black Africans of Ethiopoid type; they look no different than their genetic brothers from the Horn of Africa.
The lightest Berbers like the Kabyles, the Riffians or the Guanches have absorbed a large number of Whites; but their DNA shows that they have East African ancestors of Ethiopoid type.
There are still a large number or unmixed Berbers and they are Black people.
They mostly live in rural areas, southern regions and deep in the Sahara Desert.
Whites were, indeed, enslaved by dark brown skinned indigenous North-East and Saharan Africans not only in Africa but in Europe.
It is taboo to talk about it in Euro-centric circles.
You twist facts into racist culture-vulture Afronazi lies.

Guanches "mixed with white"??? LOL... they WERE Eurasians to start with, as were the Berbers.

Notice the whitest Berbers are in the remote areas? Notice that female DNA mrkers are nearly all Eurasian?

Figure it out, Afronazi scum.

Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#17311 Sep 6, 2013
KiloEcho wrote:
Kiloecho replies
Curious Me, what kind of a meltdown is this?
Calling me all those names does not make you look good, seriously?!!!!
You don't seem to understand that Africans have specific genetic markers, like the E haplogroup and its subclades.
All indigenous carry the E haplogroup and one of its subclades.
Outside Africa, the presence of E and its haplogroup is considered African admixture whether you like it or not.
Pygmoid, Capoid, Congoid, Nilotid, Sudanid and Ethiopoid, we are all indigenous Africans.
You are mad because the E3b aka e1b1b which originates among dark brown skinned Ethiopoids of the Horn of Africa, south of the Sahara, can be found in places claimed by Euro-centrists as White lands like Europe or Caucasian lands like North Africa or Western Asia
http://www.eupedia.com/europe/european_y-dna_...
http://www.thegeneticatlas.com/E1b_Y-DNA.htm
http://www.thegeneticatlas.com/mutations.htm
http://shelf3d.com/i/Haplogroup%20E1b1b%20 (Y-DNA)
http://haplogroup2.blogspot.com/2012/10/blog-...
Europeans have intermixed with dark brown skinned North-East and Saharan Africans for a very long period of time, including in Europe in Southern Greece and Italiy, in particular.
As a cover up for this "miscegenation", they inducted North-East and Saharan Africans into the extended Caucasian family far away from the Congoid and other Black Africans like the Nilotid or Capoid.
You speak of no evidence, only theories of eurocentric conspiracies.

Deal with facts: DNA of the Maghreb has been mostly Eurasian for 30,000 years. You cannot dispute that, as it is proven by all the genetic evidence you ignore.

You're a liar and a racist. Know what happens to lying racists, cabrona?
trollslayer

Midlothian, IL

#17312 Sep 6, 2013
KiloEcho wrote:
Curious Me said
HAH!
Oh, shut up with your OUTTA WHACK, CRACK ATTACK, IRRELEVANT, TWISTED AND BROKEN POOR EXCUSE FOR EVEN LOW GRADE PEANUT GALLERY MAKESHIFT RHETORIC, DÚMB ÁSS.
•••
ONE MORE TIME...
'E-V13'Y-HG DID NOT COALESCE IN ANY PART OF AFRICA,
SO IT IS NOT AT ALL AFRICAN, FÓÓL.
•••
Oh and another thing:
your føøl áss assertion that 'E'Y-Hg Congoids are blood kin to the 'B'Y-Hg Pygmoids and also to the 'A'Y-Hg Capoids is even dúmber than if I were to stúpidly assert that the Vikings are blood kin to the Han Chinese.
Kiloecho replies
Curious Me, what kind of a meltdown is this?
Calling me all those names does not make you look good, seriously?!!!!
You don't seem to understand that Africans have specific genetic markers, like the E haplogroup and its subclades.
All indigenous carry the E haplogroup and one of its subclades.
Outside Africa, the presence of E and its haplogroup is considered African admixture whether you like it or not.
Pygmoid, Capoid, Congoid, Nilotid, Sudanid and Ethiopoid, we are all indigenous Africans.
You are mad because the E3b aka e1b1b which originates among dark brown skinned Ethiopoids of the Horn of Africa, south of the Sahara, can be found in places claimed by Euro-centrists as White lands like Europe or Caucasian lands like North Africa or Western Asia
http://www.eupedia.com/europe/european_y-dna_...
http://www.thegeneticatlas.com/E1b_Y-DNA.htm
http://www.thegeneticatlas.com/mutations.htm
http://shelf3d.com/i/Haplogroup%20E1b1b%20 (Y-DNA)
http://haplogroup2.blogspot.com/2012/10/blog-...
Europeans have intermixed with dark brown skinned North-East and Saharan Africans for a very long period of time, including in Europe in Southern Greece and Italiy, in particular.
As a cover up for this "miscegenation", they inducted North-East and Saharan Africans into the extended Caucasian family far away from the Congoid and other Black Africans like the Nilotid or Capoid.
KiloEcho wrote:
Curious Me, what kind of a meltdown is this?

Calling me all those names does not make you look good, seriously?!!!!
name-calling is a typically troll behavior when they've been beaten.
Intelligent PPL. don't have to resort to name-calling.
trollslayer

Midlothian, IL

#17313 Sep 6, 2013
Sinajuavi wrote:
<quoted text>
You speak of no evidence, only theories of eurocentric conspiracies.
Deal with facts: DNA of the Maghreb has been mostly Eurasian for 30,000 years. You cannot dispute that, as it is proven by all the genetic evidence you ignore.
You're a liar and a racist. Know what happens to lying racists, cabrona?
Show us the " conspiracy"..u troll

" You are mad because the E3b aka e1b1b which originates among dark brown skinned Ethiopoids of the Horn of Africa, south of the Sahara, can be found in places claimed by Euro-centrists as White lands like Europe or Caucasian lands like North Africa or Western Asia"

http://www.eupedia.com/europe/european_y-dna_ ...
http://www.thegeneticatlas.com/E1b_Y-DNA.htm
http://www.thegeneticatlas.com/mutations.htm
http://shelf3d.com/i/Haplogroup%20E1b1b%20 (Y-DNA)
http://haplogroup2.blogspot.com/2012/10/blog -...

“DANGER!!”

Level 8

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#17315 Sep 7, 2013
trollfool wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
name-calling is a typically troll behavior when they've been beaten.
Intelligent PPL. don't have to resort to name-calling.
SAYS YOU, mørøn.

The fact is that your ill chosen avatar sobrique has been your own never ending(and lame, I might add) bid at wholly gratuitous "NAME CALLING".

It must be that you are merely projecting because you truly are an unintelligent twerp who has never ever been able to come up with anything other than the signs of your own ineptitude.

“DANGER!!”

Level 8

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#17316 Sep 7, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
Show us the " conspiracy"..u troll
" You are mad because the E3b aka e1b1b which originates among dark brown skinned Ethiopoids of the Horn of Africa, south of the Sahara, can be found in places claimed by Euro-centrists as White lands like Europe or Caucasian lands like North Africa or Western Asia"
http://www.eupedia.com/europe/european_y-dna_ ...
http://www.thegeneticatlas.com/E1b_Y-DNA.htm
http://www.thegeneticatlas.com/mutations.htm
http://shelf3d.com/i/Haplogroup%20E1b1b%20 (Y-DNA)
http://haplogroup2.blogspot.com/2012/10/blog -...
ASKED AND ANSWERED, DÚMB ÁSS.

Now, as usual, you're just repeating your passed failures.
trollslayer

Chicago, IL

#17317 Sep 7, 2013
"The original Berbers are Black Africans of Ethiopoid type; they look no different than their genetic brothers from the Horn of Africa.

The lightest Berbers like the Kabyles, the Riffians or the Guanches have absorbed a large number of Whites; but their DNA shows that they have East African ancestors of Ethiopoid type"

-KiloEcho
___

Again.....name-calling is a typically troll behavior when they've been beaten. Intelligent PPL. don't have to resort to name-calling.

Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#17318 Sep 7, 2013
Interesting that 30k yr old remains from the Maghreb are of Cro-Magnon type and have Eurasian DNA... hmmmmm... must be a Eurocentric conspiracy.

Those pesky guanches are also a Eurocentric conspiracy.

And the site of Taforalt... obviously a conspiracy by Eurocentric Nazis in denial of Africa's greatness.

A Eurocentric conspiracy of Medieval Nazis created false images of Eurasian-type Moors in Iberia.

The tricky cave apes!

Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#17319 Sep 7, 2013
How tedious you Afronazis.

Of course we know that the Sahara was usually a desert, that when passage was possible, judging from the DNA, about 20,000 years ago African males moved north and mixed with the existing indigenous Eurasian population of the Maghreb.

As there were no females involved, clearly these Africans were gay pastoralists.

Still the gay pastoralist DNA is a minority in the Maghreb.

Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#17320 Sep 7, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
"The original Berbers are Black Africans of Ethiopoid type; they look no different than their genetic brothers from the Horn of Africa.
The lightest Berbers like the Kabyles, the Riffians or the Guanches have absorbed a large number of Whites; but their DNA shows that they have East African ancestors of Ethiopoid type"
-KiloEcho
___
Again.....name-calling is a typically troll behavior when they've been beaten. Intelligent PPL. don't have to resort to name-calling.
Wrong, of course. The Guanches had the same DNA as the Maghreb 6000 yrs ago, of Eurasian type. They were the same people who'd been in the Maghreb since 30,000 years ago: Eurasians.

You can't twist the guanches into Africans any more than you can for the Maghreb generally for the past 30,000 years.

Or perhaps it was Eurocentric Nazis in Egypt who portrayed Berbers as Eurasians.

Afronazi liar.
trollslayer

Chicago, IL

#17321 Sep 7, 2013
Sinajuavi wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong, of course. The Guanches had the same DNA as the Maghreb 6000 yrs ago, of Eurasian type. They were the same people who'd been in the Maghreb since 30,000 years ago: Eurasians.
You can't twist the guanches into Africans any more than you can for the Maghreb generally for the past 30,000 years.
Or perhaps it was Eurocentric Nazis in Egypt who portrayed Berbers as Eurasians.
Afronazi liar.
LINKS or authority source. OR stop trolling

“Maat's my principle”

Level 9

Since: Jan 12

bamako,mali

#17322 Sep 8, 2013
Exactly !
KiloEcho

Congo, The Democratic Republic of the

#17323 Sep 9, 2013
Sinajuavi said

Obviously a conspiracy by Eurocentric Nazis in denial of Africa's greatness.

A Eurocentric conspiracy of Medieval Nazis created false images of

Eurasian-type Moors in Iberia.

The tricky cave apes!

KiloEcho replies

You are right this time

There is, indeed, a mega Eurocentric conspiracy in denial of Africa's greatness

The so called White people whose homeland is in the CAVES of Central Eurasia have no ancient history to speak or even ancient writing sytem and language to boast about

Since they left their caves of Central Eurasia (somewhere in Northern Paskistan or Northeastern Afghanistan where their lost brothers the Nuristani still live as cavedwellers), the so called whites have gone from civilization to civilization.... burning, stealing, if need be, faking historical artifacts so that they can make false claim of White supremacy.

For a good reason, the so called Whites are mad because they cannot trace their origins to any land. The homeland of the Whites is one of the most garded secrets and mysteries of European history.

That is why, they keep on exploring and stealing lands from aboriginal populations. They did in India, in Europe, in Western Asia, North Africa, the Americas, South Africa and Australia.

They made countless of victims along the way: the Dravidians of India, the dark brown skinned aboriginal Elamites and Sumerians, the brown cooper skinned Pelasgians, Etruscans, Minoans, Estrucans, Iberians of Europe, Native Americans, Natives Southern Africans and Aborigines of Australia.

The so called European languages, including the English language are a mixture of all languages which Asian, African and Indian civilizations created. The latin is derived fom the Phoenician alphabet.

There is a conspiracy, I maintain, that is why the so called Whites spend so much of their lives using false media, false academia, false cinema and false academia trying to paint non Whites as inferior. They cannot stand to look at themselves that is why they spend day in day out trying to exploit non Whites

As for the conspiracy against Africans, Europe and Africa have exchange periods of brilliance and dominance across their common borders, the Mediterranean Sea and the Straights of Gibraltar.

Chapters of world history when Africans (the Moors, the Egyptians, the Carthaginians etc.) were dominant and brilliant, including in Europe have been silenced.

White slavery in Africa is a taboo. African admixture among European is downplayed or hardly acknowledged. The early Christians of Africa, many of them became Saints or even Patron Saints of European cities are not properly recognized. The Patron Saint of the Holy Roman Empire, the black skinned Saint Maurice is almost unheard of. Popes or Roman Emperors of African descent are almost never mentioned in history classes of the Western world.

The biggest conspiracy tactic is the induction of North-East and Saharan Africans into the extended Caucasian family far away from other Africans even though they have specific African genetic markers, predominantly dark brown skin color.

to be continued.
KiloEcho

Congo, The Democratic Republic of the

#17324 Sep 9, 2013
Sinajuavi said

obviously a conspiracy by Eurocentric Nazis in denial of Africa's greatness.

A Eurocentric conspiracy of Medieval Nazis created false images of Eurasian-type Moors in Iberia.

KiloEcho replies

Paul Gaffarel (1843-1920), a scientist and a prolific historian of French descent wrote a wonderful passage on races and world dominance.

Several races seem to have, in turn, exercised world dominance, and been at the forefront of civilization.

The order of succession is now very difficult to determine.

However, the Black race appears to be the first.

The Malays hunted down Blacks in the islands of Polynesia; the Hindus chased them far into the interior of the Deccan and Ceylon.

Blacks are represented in Egyptian monuments and easily recognizable by the color of their skin, snub nose and slanted eyes. They were later replaced by invaders.

THE FINAL TRIUMPH OF OUR RACE (THE WHITE RACE) DATES ONLY FROM THE 16C WHEN NATIVE AMERICAN TRIBES WERE DESTROYED OR ABSORBED BY EUROPEANS.

Baldwin, John D. John Denison (1809-1883) who was a member of the prestigious American Oriental Society wrote the following:

It is now admitted that a people of the Cushite or Ethiopian race, sometimes called Hamites, were the first civilizers and builders throughout Western Asia, and they are traced, by remains of their language, their architecture, and the influence of their civilization, on both shores of the Mediterranean, in Eastern Africa and the Nile valley, in Hindustan, and in the islands of the Indian Seas.

M. Constantine de Volney, Travels through Syria and Egypt in the Years 1783-1785 (London 1787)

The Egyptian must have been real Negroes of the same species of the natives of Africa”.

In other words, the ancient Egyptians were true Negroes of the same stock as all the autochthonous people of Africa and from the datum one sees how their race, after some centuries of mixing with the blood of the Romans and Greeks, must have lost the full blackness of its original color but retained the impress of its original mold.

In the early-600s, the Spanish bishop and encyclopaedist, Isidore of Seville wrote:

The Moors have bodies black as night, while the skin of the Gauls is white.

As for the Berbers, they were described by early European and Arab anthropologists and travelers as Black people

1stt c. A.D.–“Diodorus Siculus speaks in reference to the expedition of Agathocles a Sardinian general, of three Libyan tribes on the coast of Tunisia, the Micatani and Zufoni (see Zafan ),who were nomads and the Asfodelodi, who by the color of their skin resembled the ETHIOPIANS”, p. 50 The Mediterranean Race Book XX, 38, 57 Guiseppe Sergi, 1901. The Micatani were also called Ukutameni and Khethim by Josephus. In later writings they are called Ketama Berbers. The name Maketa or Imakitan remains a name for the eastern branches of the Tuareg.

6th A.D.– Procopius in his History of the Wars book IV contrasting the Germanic Vandals who had settled in North Africa with the Moors claimed the Vandals were not “black skinned like the Maurusioi”. The tribes he classified as Maurusioi are those now classified as ancient Berbers, the Numidians, Masaesyle, Gaitules, Massyles and Mezikes several other “Berber” tribes then settled between Tunisia and Morocco.

Some medieval Arab writers such as al-Jahiz applied the term "blacks" to practically all peoples darker than the average Arab, and "whites" to peoples lighter than the norm:

"The blacks are more numerous than the whites.

The whites at most consist of the people of Persia, Jibal, and Khurasan, the Greeks, Slavs, Franks, and Avars, and some few others, not very numerous;

the BLACKS include the Zanj, Ethiopians, the people of Fazzan, the BERBERS, the COPTS, and Nubians, the people of Zaghawa, Marw, Sind and India, Qamar and Dabila, China, and Masin...
trollslayer

Chicago, IL

#17325 Sep 9, 2013
"
There is a conspiracy, I maintain, that is why the so called Whites spend so much of their lives using false media, false academia, false cinema and false academia trying to paint non Whites as inferior. They cannot stand to look at themselves that is why they spend day in day out trying to exploit non Whites"
-KiloEcho
___

is this untrue?
trollslayer

Chicago, IL

#17326 Sep 9, 2013
" All the early major Berber tribes including the Masmuda, Sanhaja, Ketama Zenata and Nafusa are described as dark reddish brown like the “Indi’ or as “blacks” or Ethiopians in early documents. The notion of the early Berbers as being “whites” or Caucasoid is a new and racist one related to the concept of the African “Hamite”. Certainly the original Berber-speakers were never referred to as anything but “black” or something near it until the 12th century and were otherwise considered the color of Abyssinians and other so called “Indi”.
Even the Kabyles a notoriously fair-skinned “Berber” people of North Africa are up until the 19th century described as “brown” "apart from a few clans".(See quotes below).

The knowledge that Europeans were changing the complexion literally and figuratively of North Africa up until the 19th century has disappeared from modern European histories. Most know about the large part played by sub-saharan black slaves in the making of modern North Africa and Arabia while the white slave trade which was in fact dominant trade in North Africa until the fall of Constantinople (Istanbul in Turkey) in the 15th century had been largely ignored in historical writings of the 20th.

Yet it was only a few centuries ago that Europeans visiting North Africa commenting on the fact that,“on almost every street of the cities of Barbary, Europeans could be seen harnessed to carts like draught horses or selling water from jars loaded on the backs of donkeys”.

1809 Commentary on those called “Moors” by an early 19th century observer:“They carry the Christian captives about the desert to the different markets to sell them for they soon discover that their habits of life render them unserviceable , or very inferior to the black slaves of Timbuktoo.“ from An Account of the Empire of Marocco, by J. G. Jackson published 1809 and 1814.

2003 -“From 1500 to 1650 when trans-Atlantic slaving was still in its infancy more Europeans were taken to Barbary than black African slaves to the Americas. See, Robert Davis Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters: White Slavery in the Mediterranean, the Barbary Coast, and Italy, 1500-1800, MacMillan Publishers, published 2003. "
_____

Is all this untrue? lets see a link
Jeff

Natick, MA

#17327 Sep 9, 2013
KiloEcho wrote:
You are right this time
There is, indeed, a mega Eurocentric conspiracy in denial of Africa's greatness
The so called White people whose homeland is in the CAVES of Central Eurasia have no ancient history to speak or even ancient writing sytem and language to boast about
Since they left their caves of Central Eurasia (somewhere in Northern Paskistan or Northeastern artifacts so that they can make false claim of White supremacy.
For a good reason, the so called Whites are mad because they cannot trace their origins to any land. The homeland of the Whites is one of the most garded secrets and mysteries of European history.
That is why, they keep on exploring and stealing lands from aboriginal populations. They did in India, in Europe, in Western Asia, North Africa, the Americas, South Africa and Australia.
They made countless of victims along the way: the Dravidians of India, the dark brown skinned aboriginal Elamites and Sumerians, the brown cooper skinned Pelasgians, Etruscans, Minoans, Estrucans, Iberians of Europe, Native Americans, Natives Southern Africans and Aborigines of Australia.anean Sea and the Straights of Gibraltar.
Chapters of world history when Africans (the Moors, the Egyptians, the Carthaginians etc.) were dominant and brilliant, including in Europe have been silenced.
of the Western world.
The biggest conspiracy tactic is the induction of North-East and Saharan Africans into the extended color.
to be continued.
Lying "motts" or "KiloEcho" or 'becky' or whatever other FAKE username you post under next in your obsession to claim Europeans as 'not white'. White people homelands have always been in Europe. Europe is the home region of those white people your stupdiass 'hates' but who you can't stop trying to claim. Europe is a NONE tropical region with Low UV Radiation where white skin was more cohesive for survival over your black skin, dumbass. Pelasgians, Etruscans, Minoans, Estrucans, Iberians of Europe etc were light skinned Europeans similar to modern Europeans both genetically and phenotypically, stupidass. In fact many modern Europeans still carry the haplogroups of their prehistoric and ancient European ancestors. The European languages are Indo-European in origins, dumbass, they have no connection to Asian or African languages, you linguistically challenged buffoon. Modern Europeans also carry native Prehistoric European haplogroups like Haplotype I, a marker that is NOT common among you blacks but very common still among Europeans, nor is this marker common among people in in Asia (Northern Pakistan, Afghanistan). Nuristani cluster away from Europeans, you identity confused reject.

"The Nuristani people's closest relation is to the Kalash people. Furthermore, they have very little genetic relation to neighbouring ethnic groups like Pashtuns and Kashmiris. This is because they have always remained isolated in the mountains which has led them to become a genetically isolated population."
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons...

Christianity started in the Middle East, so early Christians were Middle Eastern people similar to Middle Eastern people today, Christianity spread into Europe and Africa FROM the Middle East. Africans were just as much PAGANS as all the others. Nubians were making artwork of Mary and Jesus as light skinned but again you don't want to address that because it exposes your Afrocentric lies.

There were NO Africans in the Americas prior to Columbus era. The Americas had nothing to do with Africans, you self hating idiot. "Moors" did not hold a racial identity, stupid, it was originally meant towards North African Berbers, later on it was applied towards mostly Muslims of ANY COLOR and race including many who were white, black, brown, mixed and everything in between, moron. In other words included many Moors who were not 'black'.
http://warfare.totalh.net/Cantiga/Cantigas_de...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
White Languages to be Banned in Africa ? 4 min Labor 526
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min Incognito4Ever 1,221,073
5 Reasons "Non-Blacks" Are Most Active on Black... 5 min Suebi212 55
Hebrew Israelite (Feb '11) 7 min Ben YISRAEL 117,195
Indians HATE white people (Jun '14) 8 min Suebi212 32
How welfare destroyed African Americans. 9 min Reading 6
Who is to blame for the end of the whitey era ?... 14 min Current Affairs 1
BREAKING NEWS: Black gangs threaten Baltimore ... 20 min Roscoe 106
News 5 Reasons The American Dream Is Eluding Black P... 22 min coretta 620
Whats the best age for white females take black... 33 min hackney 52
Major Protesting in Baltimore Right Now 41 min Roscoe 162
More from around the web