There's absolutely no logic to your statement about some alleged and imaginary 'Cushitic' being here or there, or even 'Semitic' for that matter.<quoted text>
Says you, not African specialists.
Cushitic was in Ethiopia before Semitic.
Deal with it.
You DON'T have any actual proof and neither does that silly little Ethiopian blog sheet that you 'think' will take the place of actual proof.
Just because it says it's so doesn't actually make it so, or didn't you know!?
I've been talking about REAL Peoples that have been tracked anthropologically, and the only thing with which YOU can come up to counter this is some alleged and misconstrued nonsense about linguistics that don't mean a dámned thing with out the corresponding convergence of the right Peoples at the right time, and YOU just don't have that.