the moors were black africans not ara...

“DANGER!!”

Level 8

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#12729 Jan 31, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
bump
" Indeed, there has been a long indirectly-stated desire to make the coastal northern piece of the African continent an extension of Europe, and territory which has traditionally been THE domain of European-descended peoples than of autochthonous Africans, which are generally treated as "newcomers" to the region.
In other words, some sort of a>>>> "natural" apartheid was put in place in the late Upper Paleolithic until some time in the early Holocene, preventing autochthonous Africans from inhabiting the place,<<<<<< <<
while the same region was supposedly hospitable to "European immigrants". This theme blatantly makes its reappearance in another study that has fairly recently enjoyed elevated circulation and has become a citation-favorite within online 'white' supremacist cult gatherings, undoubtedly attributable to the French-published study becoming more accessible as English-translated versions became more available on the net. "
http://www.google.com/url...
HAH!

Suck it, BÍTCH.

It's ever so easy to prove you wrong, simply because WE are right.

The general population of North Africa has not changed significantly since before the Holocene Period.

http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info%3Ado...

"The indigenous North African ancestry may have been more common in Berber populations and appears most closely related to populations outside of Africa, but divergence between Maghrebi peoples and Near Eastern/Europeans likely precedes the Holocene (>12,000 ya)."

“DANGER!!”

Level 8

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#12730 Jan 31, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
bump
" Indeed, there has been a long indirectly-stated desire to make the coastal northern piece of the African continent an extension of Europe, and territory which has traditionally been THE domain of European-descended peoples than of autochthonous Africans, which are generally treated as "newcomers" to the region.
In other words, some sort of a>>>> "natural" apartheid was put in place in the late Upper Paleolithic until some time in the early Holocene, preventing autochthonous Africans from inhabiting the place,<<<<<< <<
while the same region was supposedly hospitable to "European immigrants". This theme blatantly makes its reappearance in another study that has fairly recently enjoyed elevated circulation and has become a citation-favorite within online 'white' supremacist cult gatherings, undoubtedly attributable to the French-published study becoming more accessible as English-translated versions became more available on the net. "
http://www.google.com/url...
HAH!

Suck it some more, FØØL.

http://www.humanphenotypes.com/Saharid.html

http://www.humanphenotypes.com/Saharid.html

http://www.humanphenotypes.com/Berid.html

“DANGER!!”

Level 8

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#12731 Jan 31, 2013
Ooooops, one too many "Saharid". I'll trade you one "Saharid" for a "BERBERID":

http://www.humanphenotypes.com/Berberid.html
trollslayer

Munster, IN

#12733 Jan 31, 2013
" Berberid is the least pigmented phenotype native to the African continent. "

My non-troll friends. There is really no such thing as "berber". Berber is a East African language.
When you here " Near Eastern/Europeans likely precedes the Holocene (>12,000 ya)." It's a "likely"
lie.

There's NO proof of euros or yellow asians inhabiting NO part of Africa b4 blacks. Blacks are the only onesALL of Africa. No was part of Africa was "euro outpost". White slaves in N.Africa is a different story.
trollslayer

Munster, IN

#12734 Jan 31, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
Black Native North Africans (See ethnic name below photos)
http://www.google.com/url...
__________
Only 1 man can educate us on said topic "the moors were black africans not arabs!!! "
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =A8NGzBlWEWYXX
When look at bogus "studies" done back NON-Black scientists, we have to ask ourselves if the various NATIVE N. Africans below were
sampled are taken into account.

http://www.google.com/url...
Barros Serrano-Bey

United States

#12735 Jan 31, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
bump
" Indeed, there has been a long indirectly-stated desire to make the coastal northern piece of the African continent an extension of Europe, and territory which has traditionally been THE domain of European-descended peoples than of autochthonous Africans, which are generally treated as "newcomers" to the region.
In other words, some sort of a>>>> "natural" apartheid was put in place in the late Upper Paleolithic until some time in the early Holocene, preventing autochthonous Africans from inhabiting the place,<<<<<< <<
while the same region was supposedly hospitable to "European immigrants". This theme blatantly makes its reappearance in another study that has fairly recently enjoyed elevated circulation and has become a citation-favorite within online 'white' supremacist cult gatherings, undoubtedly attributable to the French-published study becoming more accessible as English-translated versions became more available on the net. "
http://www.google.com/url...
You Afronazi racists see it all in terms of “desire”. Since you, being a racist (therefore subhuman) wish/desire to make every civilization “black”, you assume others have a similar racist motivation.

My motivation is nothing but to correctly interpret evidence so as to arrive at some reasonable understanding of historical fact.

And the FACT is that the Maghreb has been predominantly Eurasian for 30k years.

All the evidence clearly establishes that, and your pseudo-radical political and racist screed changes nothing.

You're a fool, boy.
Barros Serrano-Bey

United States

#12736 Jan 31, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
" Berberid is the least pigmented phenotype native to the African continent. "
My non-troll friends. There is really no such thing as "berber". Berber is a East African language.
When you here " Near Eastern/Europeans likely precedes the Holocene (>12,000 ya)." It's a "likely"
lie.
There's NO proof of euros or yellow asians inhabiting NO part of Africa b4 blacks. Blacks are the only onesALL of Africa. No was part of Africa was "euro outpost". White slaves in N.Africa is a different story.
Here again your Afronazism constitutes culture-genocide.

There are no Berbers? Well they're called Amazigh, not Berber, really, but they do most certainly exist.

Their origin is mostly in the Mideast, going back 30k years. And their language also came from the Mideast, obviously.

If there language had been brought in by northeast Africans, it would be Nilotic or Semitic, and it is neither.

Yes, there is ample proof of Eurasians in the Maghreb 30k years ago. This is beyond question. Morphology and DNA of remains of that age show clearly a Mideastern origin for the original base population of the Maghreb.

You spew cliches and platitudes, but no truth, boy.
Barros Serrano-Bey

United States

#12737 Jan 31, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
When look at bogus "studies" done back NON-Black scientists, we have to ask ourselves if the various NATIVE N. Africans below were
sampled are taken into account.
http://www.google.com/url...
What an uneducated intellectual misfit you prove yourself to be. Only one man can educate us on a topic? LOL...

Sounds more like idol worship than academic pursuit.

Up yours.

“DANGER!!”

Level 8

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#12738 Jan 31, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
" Berberid is the least pigmented phenotype native to the African continent. "
My non-troll friends. There is really no such thing as "berber". Berber is a East African language.
When you here " Near Eastern/Europeans likely precedes the Holocene (>12,000 ya)." It's a "likely"
lie.
There's NO proof of euros or yellow asians inhabiting NO part of Africa b4 blacks. Blacks are the only onesALL of Africa. No was part of Africa was "euro outpost". White slaves in N.Africa is a different story.
AHHHHHH HAHHH HAHH HAHHHH!!

::SUCK IT BÍTCH::

...and how did you get "yellow asians" out of this, MÓRÓN.

It's exactly as the legitimate scientific anthropological studies say it is and your just a ridiculous stump-witted JÁÇKÁSS.

If you take a video camera to the Maghrib and shoot for years scanning video of as many of the native inhabitants of the Maghribíya as you humanly can,

You will not be able to come up with anywhere nearly as many Negros as your asinine fantasies dictate.

http://www.humanphenotypes.com/NorthAethiopid...

Even the "North Aethiopid" which is associated with the Beja , Hadendowa, Tigre and similar people,

and is said to be the origin of the "Saharan Tuareg" are "Mostly Caucasoid with only very few Nég®öïd elements".

http://www.humanphenotypes.com/SouthSaharid.h...

There's also the "South Saharid" type, of which there aren't very many, as they are strictly from the Saharan Desert which is very sparsely populated.

Those "South Saharid" Peoples are "Predominantely Caucasoid, but with visible Nég®öïd influences".

"Genomic Ancestry of North Africans Supports Back-to-Africa Migrations"

http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info%3Ado...

"The indigenous North African ancestry may have been more common in Berber populations and appears most closely related to populations outside of Africa, but divergence between Maghrebi peoples and Near Eastern/Europeans likely precedes the Holocene (>12,000 ya)."

When they say "likely precedes the Holocene",ÁSS HÓLE, all that they mean to say is that it most probably was NOT just shortly AFTER the Holocene, YOU DELUSIONAL FÓÓL ÁSS MÓRÓN.

So much for that ídiot speculation about an imaginary population changing onslaught of European Slaves, FÓÓL.

If THAT had actually been happening, to that degree, there never would have been a market for the BLACK SLAVES that the the Saharan Tuareg made a centuries long career off of transporting up to the Maghribíya and its Maghribíyan ports.

"We also find significant signatures of sub-Saharan African ancestry that vary substantially among populations. These sub-Saharan ancestries appear to be a recent introduction into North African populations, dating to about 1,200 years ago in southern Morocco and about 750 years ago into Egypt, possibly reflecting the patterns of the trans-Saharan slave trade that occurred during this period."

::SUCK ON THAT TOO, BÍTCH::

Hahh hahh hahh,

obviously, YOU can't HANDLE the truth.
trollslayer

Munster, IN

#12740 Jan 31, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
When we look at bogus "studies" done back NON-Black scientists, we have to ask ourselves if the various NATIVE N. Africans below were
sampled or taken into account.

http://www.google.com/url...

__________

It's proven ...there was nothing stopping Africans from traveling to ALL parts of Africa, whether through the formerly wet. lush, green Sahara or via the coast line. Anything else is a lie.
trollslayer

Munster, IN

#12741 Jan 31, 2013
Neelix and Kes wrote:
Everyone needs to accept that it is IMPOSSIBLE not unlikely but IMPOSSIBLE that the Moorish people were black. The Moors are the result of the Berber Arab people of North Africa converting to Islam after Middle Eastern Arabic missionaries spread Islam to the Berbers, these two peoples Berbers and Middle Eastern muslims became the Moors. Throughout history black people NEVER had steel weapons or armour, no boats that could carry soildiers, no maps, no use of the wheel, no cavalry (meaning soldiers on beasts) no siege weapons and no undrstanding of the world outside of their continent (even saying outside of their continent would be generous to say) How could they have possibly been black if they originated in the North of Africa? Lets just say they were black, how could they reach Sicilly, Spain, Portugal and Southern France with no sailing ships to carry thousands of soldiers and their equipment (weapons and provisions)? How could they CONQUER areas of these lands with their stone and wood weapons going up against, steel weapons and armour, cavalry with lances, steel tipped arrows, swords, pikes and the military skills and tactics of ALL THESE ARMIES? How?...how? Let's look at Africa for a moment, why is it that the only great structures, monuments and cities are in the North of Africa, the non black Arabian part of Africa? North Africa is cheifly dry, arid, desert. Howcome NO EMPIRES thrived in the fertile, resource rich, plentiful black part of the continent. The race for Africa was the scramble for plentiful natural resources by European powers into the BLACK part of Africa. The Moors were NOT black PERIOD!
This black man with a PHD doctorate discusses the problem of the black race and why they never had a society. When he says "Egypt is not Africa" he is cleary saying that North Africans are NOT black people.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
James David Manning is a idiot. Egypt is not part of Africa, he says. Whatta' idiot. It's clowns like him he need to get educated.
The fool said Africans never built boats. How ignorant is that. The oldest boat in the world was found in N igeria. Manning is a bad joke and a un-educated disgrace.

“DANGER!!”

Level 8

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#12744 Jan 31, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
When we look at bogus "studies" done back NON-Black scientists, we have to ask ourselves if the various NATIVE N. Africans below were
sampled or taken into account.
http://www.google.com/url...
__________
It's proven ...there was nothing stopping Africans from traveling to ALL parts of Africa, whether through the formerly wet. lush, green Sahara or via the coast line. Anything else is a lie.
That's all just a bunch of delusional BÚLLSHÍT.

None of those people are autochthanous North Africans.

Since when are Nilotics, Fulani, and descendants of 'Black' slaves to be considered Native North Africans,ÁSS HÓLE!??

Maybe sometime, many tens of thousands of years ago, when there were only 'A'Y-Hg and Proto-'A'Y-Hg Homo-Sapiens in the World, there was a settlement of sub-Saharan African Homo-Sapiens in North Africa, but they all died off and left no living descendants in North Africa.

Only a FÓÓL like you would ever 'think' that something like that would ever count.

HÉLL NÓ, sub-Saharan Africans did NOT beat the descendants of Eurasians to settling successfully in North Africa.

'U6'mtDNA did not coalesce from any sub-Saharan African parent haplogroup.

The Progenitor of the 'U6'mtDNA was undoubtedly some other 'U'mtDNA haplogroup,

which means that it was of Eurasion ancestral origin.

The 'U6'mtDNA arrived or coalesced in North Africa more than 30,000yrs ago.

That beats out 'L3'mtDNA by more than 10,000yrs.

For overwhelmingly MOST of the time, the Sahara actually WAS a huge barrier which kept sub-Saharan Africans out of North Africa except by going up through the Nile,

but North Africa was already populated by Caucasian North Africans and that would have easily been enough to keep large amounts of sub-Saharan Africans from taking over North Africa.

“DANGER!!”

Level 8

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#12745 Jan 31, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
When we look at bogus "studies" done back NON-Black scientists, we have to ask ourselves if the various NATIVE N. Africans below were
sampled or taken into account.
http://www.google.com/url...
__________
It's proven ...there was nothing stopping Africans from traveling to ALL parts of Africa, whether through the formerly wet. lush, green Sahara or via the coast line. Anything else is a lie.
Puñeta Bey may be 'Black' but he is no scientist, FÓÓL.

“DANGER!!”

Level 8

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#12746 Jan 31, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
James David Manning is a idiot. Egypt is not part of Africa, he says. Whatta' idiot. It's clowns like him he need to get educated.
The fool said Africans never built boats. How ignorant is that. The oldest boat in the world was found in N igeria. Manning is a bad joke and a un-educated disgrace.
HAH!

You poor dúmb fúçking son of a bítch,

that 'boat', you are foolishly boasting about, was not EVER EVEN HARDLY SEAWORTHY.

It was OK for floating around in a calm lake, maybe, but it would have been busted to bits in any rough sea waters.

Even the Egyptians didn't have seaworthy ships and were completely dependent upon Phoenicians to transport goods over the Mediterranean Sea.

Pastor Manning makes a héll of a lot more sense than YOU ever could, FÓÓL.

Level 5

Since: Sep 12

Kinshasa, Congo, The Democratic Republic of the

#12748 Feb 1, 2013
Curious Me said

that 'boat', you are foolishly boasting about, was not EVER EVEN HARDLY SEAWORTHY.
Even the Egyptians didn't have seaworthy ships and were completely dependent upon Phoenicians to transport goods over the Mediterranean Sea.
Pastor Manning makes a héll of a lot more sense than YOU ever could, FÓÓL.

KiloEcho replies

You really suffer from an acute case of negrophobia.

I would not be suprised AT ALL if you are the descendant of Euro-slavers who owns Black slaves or had Black servants FOR CENTURIES.

I recently posted a question on Yahoo Answer about the racial identity of the Christian Moors like Saint Maurice of Egypt, the Patron Saint of the Holy Roman Empire, Saint Benedict the Moor, Johannes Morus, the Vizir of Sicily.

They were all Black African men of Catholic faith. They were not Muslim at all and yet they were Moors, that is Black African for ancient and medieval Europeans.

Here is part of the best answer I selected.

It says is all about the denial of modern day Whites (particularly those coming from Western countries with a long history of Black slavery and Black colonies) on the blackness of the Moors.

"There is a CONTROVERSY regarding the RACE of any African people whose HISTORY Europeans or the West deem to be NOTABLE.

Notice this is never the case when it comes to the history of "white" Europeans, East Asians, Indians, Persians, or Arabs. This is because, in European and Western societies, there is a strong association of failure, stupidity, incompetence, lowliness, evil, and primitiveness with "blackness".

In order to recognize the influence that people like the Moors had on Europe, they must be redefined. The general view is that "whites" are inherently superior and more advanced and intelligent than "blacks" so in order to recognize their historic influence on "whites" and others, THEIR BLACKNESS MUST BE ERASED.

This is done by ignoring the majority of evidence that exists that disproves this view but those who seek to define influential groups as "non-black" cling to what little depictions there exists of light brown individuals in order to support their argument.

This is illogical and ignores the fact that native Africans vary greatly in skin tones. Many non-mixed, native Africans may be very light in skin tone, very dark, and anywhere in between.

The following is a personal opinion about the relationships between the Whites and the Blacks

I am more and more convinced that a distant (not so distant) past the Whites had Moorish (that is dark brown skin people of East African origin, the so called Hamitic Africans) rulers, lords and masters, including in Europe, as far as the British Isles. These Moors were both feared and admired.

The Whites learned everything from them, they intermixed and intermarried with them by giving away their daughters to the most powerful of those dark brown skinned Africans.

Those White women were part and parcel of the so called White female scheme of MARRYING UP into powerful, iconic, noble and legendary Black African families for the sake of profit or inheritance.

Once the Whites became learned and powerful enough, they and their mixed offspring (the ligther the better), erased and replaced their Moorish leaders as if they have had always been on top of dark brown skinned Africans.

But collective memory being what it is, you will still find VERY OLD European traditions that celebrate or remember those powerful, iconic, noble and legendary dark brown skinned Hamitic Africans, like the Moor's head used by Europeans as puns on their names.

The Mauriac of France, the Morandi of Italy, the Morrison of England, the Morinho of Portugal, all have a Black African man or women (most oftern crowned) on their coats of arms.

If the Moors have always been Muslim and foes of the Whites, why are there crowned Moorish/Black women of some blazons? Black women did not take part in the Crusades.
Bmacwaters

New York, NY

#12750 Feb 1, 2013
Barros Serrano-Bey wrote:
All of this has been explained and proven repeatedly to these Afronazi nitwits, but they are motivated not by intellectual curiosity but by racism, and you know how that goes...
The important work is what we're doing in educational institutions... RIDDING them of the Afronazi lying ideologues!
This is progressing... soon even the public schools will be cleansed of Afronazi influence, such as the vile racist Portland Protocols.
it's happening, and there's nothing you Muzfucks can do to stop it.
Yes there is! Teach our own. And you're right. What your doing is very important..... For Lucifer.
Bmacwaters

New York, NY

#12751 Feb 1, 2013
Neelix and Kes wrote:
Everyone needs to accept that it is IMPOSSIBLE not unlikely but IMPOSSIBLE that the Moorish people were black. The Moors are the result of the Berber Arab people of North Africa converting to Islam after Middle Eastern Arabic missionaries spread Islam to the Berbers, these two peoples Berbers and Middle Eastern muslims became the Moors. Throughout history black people NEVER had steel weapons or armour, no boats that could carry soildiers, no maps, no use of the wheel, no cavalry (meaning soldiers on beasts) no siege weapons and no undrstanding of the world outside of their continent (even saying outside of their continent would be generous to say) How could they have possibly been black if they originated in the North of Africa? Lets just say they were black, how could they reach Sicilly, Spain, Portugal and Southern France with no sailing ships to carry thousands of soldiers and their equipment (weapons and provisions)? How could they CONQUER areas of these lands with their stone and wood weapons going up against, steel weapons and armour, cavalry with lances, steel tipped arrows, swords, pikes and the military skills and tactics of ALL THESE ARMIES? How?...how? Let's look at Africa for a moment, why is it that the only great structures, monuments and cities are in the North of Africa, the non black Arabian part of Africa? North Africa is cheifly dry, arid, desert. Howcome NO EMPIRES thrived in the fertile, resource rich, plentiful black part of the continent. The race for Africa was the scramble for plentiful natural resources by European powers into the BLACK part of Africa. The Moors were NOT black PERIOD!
This black man with a PHD doctorate discusses the problem of the black race and why they never had a society. When he says "Egypt is not Africa" he is cleary saying that North Africans are NOT black people.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
That black guy with his bullish!t PHD and yourself are both agents for the devil. Too bad the devil's reign is OVER! The evidence points in the opposite direction and more information is coming out proving who the Egyptian, Carthaginians, Phoenicians, Sumerians, original Mexicans, and the Moors were.
NUBIANS!
Jake

Springfield, NJ

#12753 Feb 1, 2013
KiloEcho wrote:
They were all Black African men of Catholic faith. They were not Muslim
at all and yet they were Moors, that is Black African for ancient and medieval Europeans.
Here is part of the best answer I selected..
BLACKNESS MUST BE ERASED.
This is done by ignoring the majority of evidence that exists that disproves ay be very light in skin tone, very dark, and anywhere in between
The following is a personal opinion about the relationships between the
I am more and more convinced that a distant (not so distant) past the
Whites had Moorish (that is dark brown skin people of East African origin, the so called Hamitic Africans) rulers, lords and masters, including in
Europe, as far as the British Isles. These Moors were both feared and admired.Those White women were part and parcel of the so called White female scheme of MARRYING UP into powerful, iconic, noble and legendary Black African families for the sake of profit or inheritance.
Once the Whites became learned and powerful enough, they and their
skinned Africans. But collective memory being what it is, you will still find VERY OLD European traditions that celebrate or remember those powerful, iconic, noble and legendary dark brown skinned Hamitic Africans, like the Moor's head used by Europeans as puns on their names.
The Mauriac of France, the Morandi of Italy, the Morrison of England, the
Morinho of Portugal, all have a Black African man or women (most oftern crowned) on their coats of arms.
If the Moors have always been Muslim and foes of the Whites, why are there crowned Moorish/Black women of some blazons? Black women did not take part in the Crusades.
Kneegroo shut the hell up with your lies. You kneegroos  never ruled any part of Europe especially Northern Europe like the British Isles cause you do not have the intelligence to rule modern advance countries that is why
every place you infest are undeveloped shitholes like Haiti or black Africa where you primitives still live like you are stuck in the stoneages.


You knneegrooos talk about being so great and powerful outside of Africa in countries where you kneegroos never really had a presence but in you undeveloped kneegroos lands in Africa you kneegroos still live in mud huts. What's wrong, you can't do shit to pull shithole Black Africa into the modern ages? 
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

What happened, kneegrooo, you were-supposedly so "great" outside of Africa but forgot everything when it comes to your own knnnegrrooo homelands? Did you get stuck on stupid or something, kneegroo? Dumb kneegroo always blaming your black failures on YT and playing the
victimhood, typical black mentality. Europeans don't carry any kneegrooo blood cause if we did then we would be like you ghetto infested jungle hood rats living in undeveloped shit holes in mud huts like you knneegroos do in shit hole Africa.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

No jungle primitives like you in Negro is ever ruling Europe cause if there
were then Europe would be the primitive undeveloped jungle shithole your ancestral kneegroo homelands are in undeveloped Africa today. Europe is the homeland of us whites and always was Europe is an advanced Western developed region cause YT always ruled our homelands while we can see that where you kneegrooos ruled in shithole undeveloped Africa and Haiti the kneeegrooo still live as stoneage primitives in mud huts wearing lion clothes and hunting animals with spears.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Bmacwaters

New York, NY

#12754 Feb 1, 2013
Neelix and Kes wrote:
<quoted text>
Dick muncher! Look at every country in north africa and the middle east! Look at the uprising in Egypt and the protests happening all over the arab world, Syria, Egypt, Yemen and Libya! These people are not black they are Eurasian. If blacks lived all over these areas howcome there are NO blacks there? Howcome the Arabian part of Africa thrived in the DESERT but the black resource rich, fertile part of Africa did NOTHING? Well?..give me and explaination!
Yous a stupid MF. Lol! It's incredible how [email protected] dumb and simple some people can be. Maybe that's why there's so much turmoil in that part of the world. THOSE INVADERS DON'T BELONG THERE IN THE FIRST PLACE! Plus you never believe what you see on TV because that's a tool used by the devil all the time with false images. There are plenty of Black people in these countries but you don't see them on TV and so you think they are not there. Go there and many Africans speak Arabic making them Arabs @sshole! And the Arabians came to North Africa way after that part of the world was fertile stupid. That's right. That part of the world had plenty of rain and was when it really thrived. Once the climate changed most Africans began to migrate out of the desert further south. Some remained and mixed with the northerners who were migrating to North Africa. So North Africa "thrived" before the arrival of the desert and the northerners and who in there right mind would want to live in a desert to begin with? ARABS! And they are pushing further south. And what you mean the south did nothing? What about Punt? Ethiopia? Timbuktu? There are more pyramids in the Sudan than in Egypt. Most whites are full of shit! Ha!

“DANGER!!”

Level 8

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#12756 Feb 1, 2013
KiloEcho wrote:
I recently posted a question on Yahoo Answer
HAH!

...and you 'think' "Yahoo Answer" is going to hold sway here, right!?

You've convinced yourself, maybe, but any sufficiently intelligent rational being would be readily able to see that it's all just a delusional fantasy around which you've managed to envelop your foolishly propped up ego.

The only righteously confident 'Black' individuals, that I have known, and I've known a few, are the ones that are not dependent upon a mystic sea fantasy history to keep their own self esteem afloat.

You can yammer all you want,

but any sufficient intelligent person will readily take notice that you have no way of countering what I have said about your silly little prehistoric 'Black' African ocean going boat fantasy.

You desperately want to convince your self of the absurd little fantasy in which you've envisioned a preposterous scenario that has the native sub-Saharan African dominating over Eurasians. We're talking about sub-Saharan Africans who never had the gumption to expand into the great unknown of Eurasia until the path was already worn thin by Peoples that had long before evolved far beyond any native sub-Saharan African's accomplishment.

There is a very good reason WHY the term, "sub-Saharan African" is used over and over again.

It's heavily used because there is a fundamental difference between North Africa and almost ALL of the rest of Africa.

::NORTH AFRICA IS OVERWHELMINGLY CAUCASIAN::

The following is of whom the real "MORO" was mostly comprised:

http://www.humanphenotypes.com/Saharid.html

http://www.humanphenotypes.com/Berberid.html

http://www.humanphenotypes.com/Arabid.html

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min Grey Ghostmoron 1,375,095
BM how does it feel to see Pretty BW with WM? (Apr '15) 3 min T-BOS 83
AA's how many half brothers and sisters do you ... (Apr '12) 8 min Sense 31
Hollywood new black jesus movie white people pr... 11 min biggest threat ever 4
Why Does It Take So Many BMs To Fight 1 White, ... (Jul '15) 16 min T-BOS 268
Proof of Christians who are downlow and hide th... 25 min The man 3
Great Morning Melenated beings!!! 29 min coretta lioness 9... 1
Poll Will Donald Trump be the next President of the ... (Aug '15) 3 hr dcool 1,398
Why all black women must breed with white men! 5 hr SBT 24
Italians are NOT White!!!! (Feb '12) 7 hr luchadoor 6,267
Hebrew Israelite (Feb '11) 8 hr Hittite 133,407
HANNIBAL BARCA - of Carthage (North Africa) ... (Oct '07) 9 hr Moses 3,631
More from around the web