For Afrocentrics claiming Olmecs

For Afrocentrics claiming Olmecs

Posted in the African-American Forum

First Prev
of 45
Next Last
Intrigue

United States

#1 Jul 20, 2008
Here's a video I found. There's been complains about Afrocentrism and African descendants claiming Ancient accomplishment to Sub-sahara Africans. This video is an example I found.
&fe ature=related

Level 1

Since: Jul 08

Location hidden

#2 Jul 20, 2008
what the hell is a olmec????????

Since: Oct 07

chicago

#3 Jul 20, 2008
sultan al ghazi wrote:
what the hell is a olmec????????
http://www.faculty.ucr.edu/~le gneref/ethnic/african.htm

Since: Oct 07

chicago

#4 Jul 20, 2008
Intrigue

United States

#5 Jul 20, 2008
There are theories of blacks being the first people in the Americas.

UNTOLD BLACK HISTORY: "Blacks" were the 1st Americans pt.1
&fe ature=related
Prince William

New Braunfels, TX

#6 Jul 21, 2008
Intrigue wrote:
There are theories of blacks being the first people in the Americas.
UNTOLD BLACK HISTORY: "Blacks" were the 1st Americans pt.1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =zMg-79AzbI4XX&feature=rel ated
Unproven theories DOES NOT equal HISTORY.
Intrigue

United States

#7 Jul 21, 2008
It's possible blacks came to America first, then their physics evolved to the indegenous people just like all other racest came out of black people through evolution.
Prince William

Buda, TX

#8 Jul 21, 2008
Intrigue wrote:
It's possible blacks came to America first, then their physics evolved to the indegenous people just like all other racest came out of black people through evolution.
Possible but not probable. I need to see much more evidence than just stone carvings with thick lips and broad noses.
Level 7

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#9 Jul 21, 2008
Prince William wrote:
<quoted text>Possible but not probable. I need to see much more evidence than just stone carvings with thick lips and broad noses.
There is much more if you were open-minded and willing to look for it, but even then you wouldn't believe it, because you don't want to.
Level 7

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#10 Jul 21, 2008
Morrison73 wrote:
http://www.faculty.ucr.edu/~le gneref/ethnic/african.htm
You can't prove anything to someone who has come to this forum for the expressed purpose of disproving anything positive about blacks. Why bother? They're the superior race and nothing ANYONE says is gonna change that. History, is just that His-Story! Doesn't mean it's true and it's constantly changing. But facts that disagree with what they've been taught to believe are not true, LOL!
Level 7

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#11 Jul 21, 2008
Morrison73 wrote:
http://www.faculty.ucr.edu/~le gneref/ethnic/african.htm
Excellent rebuttal btw.
Prince William

Buda, TX

#12 Jul 21, 2008
bappie wrote:
<quoted text>There is much more if you were open-minded and willing to look for it, but even then you wouldn't believe it, because you don't want to.
OK how in the hell did they cross the Southern Atlantic Ocean. Certainly not an easy task. Even the Europeans encountered great difficulty and that is because they were so much more technically advanced than Africans. Unless they traversed an entire ocean on canoes? Common get real!
WiseMan

Jamaica, NY

#13 Jul 21, 2008
one need only look at the Olmec head statues are west african.

oh and serious "afrocentrists" dont claim the olmecs were black, but that they had contact with africans blacks, which is undeniable if you just look at these pics:

http://visionaryrevue.com/webmedia4/myretteme...

http://divinebynature.tripod.com/olmec_heads1...
Prince William

Buda, TX

#14 Jul 21, 2008
WiseMan wrote:
one need only look at the Olmec head statues are west african.
oh and serious "afrocentrists" dont claim the olmecs were black, but that they had contact with africans blacks, which is undeniable if you just look at these pics:
http://visionaryrevue.com/webmedia4/myretteme...
http://divinebynature.tripod.com/olmec_heads1...
You see. Here is the problem. You said it yourselves. We need proof from legitimate Scientists NOT serious Afrocentrists who are seriously biased to believe otherwise and who can be objective.
Prince William

Buda, TX

#16 Jul 21, 2008
WiseMan wrote:
one need only look at the Olmec head statues are west african.
oh and serious "afrocentrists" dont claim the olmecs were black, but that they had contact with africans blacks, which is undeniable if you just look at these pics:
http://visionaryrevue.com/webmedia4/myretteme...
http://divinebynature.tripod.com/olmec_heads1...
I guess they traveled via Alien Spaceships? LOL You guys are a trip!
WiseMan

Jamaica, NY

#18 Jul 21, 2008
Prince William wrote:
<quoted text>You see. Here is the problem. You said it yourselves. We need proof from legitimate Scientists NOT serious Afrocentrists who are seriously biased to believe otherwise and who can be objective.
those afrocentrists and "serious scientists" will be looking at the SAME STATUES. which you can see for yourself have a distinctly WEST african profile
Level 7

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#20 Jul 21, 2008
Prince William wrote:
<quoted text>
The below comment from you, shows why it is impossible to have any type of open-minded conversation with people of your mindset:
"Even the Europeans encountered great difficulty and that is because they were so much more technically advanced than Africans".

So, superior one, I am not gonna bother responding to one of the "superior race"
Level 7

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#21 Jul 21, 2008
Brighter wrote:
<quoted text>
YOU believe it because you want to.
Hypocrite.
Disprove it then scholar! You just mock, cause that's all your kind can do!
Prince William

Buda, TX

#22 Jul 21, 2008
WiseMan wrote:
<quoted text>
those afrocentrists and "serious scientists" will be looking at the SAME STATUES. which you can see for yourself have a distinctly WEST african profile
Is that the strongest evidence you have? Dude. You need much more than that before you start claiming such nonsense. As far as the Europeans being much more technically advanced has got nothing to do with being racist or supremacist those are just the facts. Period. PROOF! I NEED PROOF! Then we can talk and I will be the first to concede but until then its all HOGWASH! Right now its all wishful thinking on your part.
Prince William

Buda, TX

#23 Jul 21, 2008
Brighter wrote:
Genetic tests indicated that Australian Aboriginals, Europeans, and Ainu arrived in very ancient times.
Later Asian immigrants (also confirmed by genetic tests) arrived and became the main population.
Ancient Native Americans had some genes found only in European populations, meaning at least a small amount of mixing occurred.
NO AFRICAN GENETICS WERE FOUND AT ALL IN ANY OF THE CORPSES.
Thank YOu. You're a logical person who chooses to rely on scientific research and facts and not on some biased "wishful thinking" rhetoric.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 45
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Al Sharpton: Royal Wedding Shows 'Last Breath' ... 3 min OccupyThis 183
No N KOREA SUMMIT 4 min Termite Power 3
would George Zimmerman have been better off black? (Mar '16) 4 min lol 64
Can we take back topix? 5 min Barros 380
News NC bank employee's 'Walking Dead' toy labeled a... 6 min f4ufighter 2
News Trump's lack of moral compass leaves America on... (Aug '17) 7 min The Patriot 1,296
If we got rid of the Negroes what would America... 7 min MASTER WHITE 5
White rage is on the way: White people aren't g... 8 min coursesoco 101
What Did African Americans Contribute To America? 11 min MASTER WHITE 58
NFL nighurs WHIPPED! Can't kneel for anthem an... 3 hr Barros 29
I need proof that the Ancient Egyptians Were No... (Oct '07) 3 hr Barros 40,798
BM in Britain please slap Meghan for us 10 hr Satan 61