Hannibal and Genghis Khan
Diego Alejandro

Houston, TX

#42 Feb 1, 2013
emperorjohn wrote:
<quoted text>
You are an idiot. Not all of the murders of Native Americans were recorded. If the Natives died mostly from diseases as you claim, how come much more survived in the South than the North? The reason is because the Spanish did not intend to wipe them out as brutally as the English did.
By south do you mean the deep dense tropical rain forest? They got wiped out too. Both cultural organization and geological earthworks in the Amazon basin are evidence of a vast and densely populated Amazonian civilization that existed and disappeared before Europeans even made direct contact with them.

Your issue is that you have to rationalize your hatred of European and mostly Americans as justified. Even if its only Hollywood inspired fantasy. BTW, their is a much greater chance that the blood of slave masters courses through your veins than any random white person that you meet. So exercise your hatred and punch yourself out.
Kern

Houston, TX

#49 Feb 1, 2013
Israel Land of Vampires wrote:
<quoted text>
Very simplistic analysis. LOL!
.......haplogroup....
haplogroup is not culture you moronic brainbrain!!!!
[email protected]!!! LOL

“Sombrero Galaxy”

Level 8

Since: Jan 10

I'm An Illegal Alien

#53 Feb 2, 2013
Jethros cousins wrote:
<quoted text>so why are there now MORE "redskins" than BEFORE whitey arrived?
because that is a fact you pulled from your own azz.

“Sombrero Galaxy”

Level 8

Since: Jan 10

I'm An Illegal Alien

#54 Feb 2, 2013
Jethros cousins wrote:
<quoted text>Hannibal was NOT a "moor" , a group of people who didn't even EXIST at that time. he was PUNIC, a semitic mediterranean race, and NOT a black, negro, Coon, darkie or Coon. You are being as stupid as the blacks are .
Hannibal was a Moor, retarded. Moor comes from the Roman word Mauros and was used to refer to people of that region.
Sean Coonery

UK

#55 Feb 2, 2013
emperorjohn wrote:
<quoted text>because that is a fact you pulled from your own azz.
no,it isn't , try looking up some stats.

“Sombrero Galaxy”

Level 8

Since: Jan 10

I'm An Illegal Alien

#56 Feb 2, 2013
Diego Alejandro wrote:
<quoted text>
By south do you mean the deep dense tropical rain forest? They got wiped out too. Both cultural organization and geological earthworks in the Amazon basin are evidence of a vast and densely populated Amazonian civilization that existed and disappeared before Europeans even made direct contact with them.
Your issue is that you have to rationalize your hatred of European and mostly Americans as justified. Even if its only Hollywood inspired fantasy. BTW, their is a much greater chance that the blood of slave masters courses through your veins than any random white person that you meet. So exercise your hatred and punch yourself out.
Millions of Mexicaans today are full native or only part native, while the Native American populace in thid country is way less than NYC. Clearly European disease were not the only reason why they died.
Sean Coonery

UK

#57 Feb 2, 2013
emperorjohn wrote:
<quoted text>
The Brits eventually relented and passed a law banning westward expansion. That law was one of the reasons we fought for independence from Britain, but that is the only reason that they will not refer to in the history books.
"WE" fought for independence? who is this WE? I never heard it was a SLAVE rebellion.
Leonides

Houston, TX

#58 Feb 2, 2013
Israel Land of Vampires wrote:
<quoted text>
North-Eastern European complex history of Anthropology & DNA has been discussed in this thread below at lengthy levels.
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/russia/T0OEP...
If you wish to learn about it.
Follow the debate here of Tarmo a (Estonian Finno-Ugric) & myself a Polish American.
There is a very strong complexity in North-Eastern Europe much more so than other regions of Europe.
The Anthropology, Genetics & Phenotype past & present of North-Eastern Europe is very complex.
...
..... Yes.... It does spill into the whole "Tocharian" thing some...
Since North-Eastern Europe is the closest region to Central Asia in Europe.
Yet all the archeological artifacts were Celtic right from tartan weave on down. You can blab all you want about genetics but, everything culturally was Celt. I'm done with you because you just seem too stupid to understand that simple point.
Leonides

Houston, TX

#59 Feb 2, 2013
emperorjohn wrote:
<quoted text>
Hannibal was a Moor, retarded. Moor comes from the Roman word Mauros and was used to refer to people of that region.
Hannibal was Carthaginian which was about the last acknowledged iteration of Pheonician fool. Although some scholars would say the line continued and founded the Venician empire ans still exists in the likes of Gore Vidal, Al Gore and various European families right down to child sacrifice.

BTW, the Moors that conquered the Iberian peninsula were Europids that migrated from Europe during the last ice age.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#60 Feb 2, 2013
Genghis would have excelled working as a butcher.

“Sombrero Galaxy”

Level 8

Since: Jan 10

I'm An Illegal Alien

#61 Feb 2, 2013
Sean Coonery wrote:
<quoted text>"WE" fought for independence? who is this WE? I never heard it was a SLAVE rebellion.
Slaves fought on both sides of the war,you stupid cretin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_American...

“Sombrero Galaxy”

Level 8

Since: Jan 10

I'm An Illegal Alien

#62 Feb 2, 2013
Leonides wrote:
<quoted text>
Hannibal was Carthaginian which was about the last acknowledged iteration of Pheonician fool. Although some scholars would say the line continued and founded the Venician empire ans still exists in the likes of Gore Vidal, Al Gore and various European families right down to child sacrifice.
BTW, the Moors that conquered the Iberian peninsula were Europids that migrated from Europe during the last ice age.
Dufus Carthage was a mixture of Moorish and Phoenician people.
Monkeyshines Month

UK

#63 Feb 2, 2013
emperorjohn wrote:
<quoted text>
Dufus Carthage was a mixture of Moorish and Phoenician people.
at the time of Carthage there was no such thing as "Moorish" people. This word was used (Moros) to describe the 8th century invaders from Mauretania.(who were mainly arab)
Monkeyshines Month

UK

#64 Feb 2, 2013
emperorjohn wrote:
<quoted text>
Hannibal was a Moor, retarded. Moor comes from the Roman word Mauros and was used to refer to people of that region.
but Carthage is/was nowhere near Mauretania! Carthage was in TUNISIA, you retarded cretin. Look at a map.

“Leading the Revolution”

Level 6

Since: Oct 09

United States

#65 Feb 2, 2013
Jahx

Some info about Hannibal:

On November 15, 218 B.C., Hannibal, a full-blooded 'Negro,' marching through conquered territory in Spain and France, performed the astounding feat of crossing the Alps. With only 26,000 of his original force of 82,000 men remaining, he defeated Rome, the mightiest military power of that age, who had a million men, in every battle for the next fifteen years. Hannibal is the father of military strategy. His tactics are still taught in the leading military academies of the United States, Enland, France, Germany and other lands

Hannibal is usually depicted as a white man, but his coins in the British Museum and the Museo Kercheriano, Rome, show him to have been an African of purest type with rings in his ears. Col. Hennebert, perhaps the leading authority on Hannibal, declares that none of the several differing portraits now exhibited as Hannibal is he, "We do not possess any authentic portrait of Hannibal," he says.(Histoire d'Annibal, Vol. I, p. 495, Paris, 1870). These coins were struck by Hannibal while he was in Italy. In the absence of other information the most logical argument is that they bore his own effigy, the more so, as the several kinds of them bear the same likeness.

Source 100 Amazing Facts About The Negro by JA Rogers
Berry

Houston, TX

#66 Feb 2, 2013
Monkeyshines Month wrote:
<quoted text>but Carthage is/was nowhere near Mauretania! Carthage was in TUNISIA, you retarded cretin. Look at a map.
It was in Apesrica which is all that matters
Jethro and his cousins

UK

#68 Feb 3, 2013
Israel Land of Vampires wrote:
<quoted text>
The DNA of Tocharians was more like Poland & Russians.
Celtics come from Poland it seems anyways like most Indo-Europeans.
... No you are stupid... You hardly even different from a Negro.
Well... You Southern Hillbillies are hardly different than Negroes.
It is like the South is just those Negroes with different skin colors.
Blacks have much more in common with Southern Whites than Northern Whites.
You both are Baptist, both love grits & fried chicken & corn bread.
You both are crazy of Jesus.
You both are pretty stupid & poor.
.... In the North the divide of Blacks & Whites is much greater in culture & also socioeconomics & everything else.
..... It is like there are just those Negroes of different skin colors South of the Mason Dixon line.
are stupid poles like you the negroes of Europe? we all know you are Halonen, or Polskahusaria. You give Polacks a bad name. I am sure they aren't all as stupid as you.
Barros Serrano

United States

#69 Feb 3, 2013
dkanela wrote:
Jahx
Some info about Hannibal:
On November 15, 218 B.C., Hannibal, a full-blooded 'Negro,' marching through conquered territory in Spain and France, performed the astounding feat of crossing the Alps. With only 26,000 of his original force of 82,000 men remaining, he defeated Rome, the mightiest military power of that age, who had a million men, in every battle for the next fifteen years. Hannibal is the father of military strategy. His tactics are still taught in the leading military academies of the United States, Enland, France, Germany and other lands
Hannibal is usually depicted as a white man, but his coins in the British Museum and the Museo Kercheriano, Rome, show him to have been an African of purest type with rings in his ears. Col. Hennebert, perhaps the leading authority on Hannibal, declares that none of the several differing portraits now exhibited as Hannibal is he, "We do not possess any authentic portrait of Hannibal," he says.(Histoire d'Annibal, Vol. I, p. 495, Paris, 1870). These coins were struck by Hannibal while he was in Italy. In the absence of other information the most logical argument is that they bore his own effigy, the more so, as the several kinds of them bear the same likeness.
Source 100 Amazing Facts About The Negro by JA Rogers
Hannibal was Phoenician. Not black. What nonsense. Not only the Carthaginians (Phoenicians), but the Numidians (Berbers) indigenous to the area were of Eurasian type. Many portraits depict them as such.

Too bad you can only get self-esteem from stealing other peoples' histories. Whitey sure has messed up your head...
Leonides

Houston, TX

#72 Feb 3, 2013
Israel Land of Vampires wrote:
<quoted text>
The DNA of Tocharians was more like Poland & Russians.
Celtics come from Poland it seems anyways like most Indo-Europeans.
... No you are stupid... You hardly even different from a Negro.
Well... You Southern Hillbillies are hardly different than Negroes.
It is like the South is just those Negroes with different skin colors.
Blacks have much more in common with Southern Whites than Northern Whites.
You both are Baptist, both love grits & fried chicken & corn bread.
You both are crazy of Jesus.
You both are pretty stupid & poor.
.... In the North the divide of Blacks & Whites is much greater in culture & also socioeconomics & everything else.
..... It is like there are just those Negroes of different skin colors South of the Mason Dixon line.
As Gandhi said: "first they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they attack you, then you win."

You obviously have no valid argument against with what my I said, therefore I'm am proven correct. Culturally they were Celtic. No different than any mid-latitude Europid.

“Sombrero Galaxy”

Level 8

Since: Jan 10

I'm An Illegal Alien

#73 Feb 3, 2013
Monkeyshines Month wrote:
<quoted text>at the time of Carthage there was no such thing as "Moorish" people. This word was used (Moros) to describe the 8th century invaders from Mauretania.(who were mainly arab)
Well I am sorry, you are right. But the term Moor comes from the term Mauri, which was the Latin designation for those ancient Berber peoples inhabiting the territory of modern Algeria and Morocco, Roman Mauretania, west of Numidia.
I forgot that Carthage was in Tunisia.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
the moors were black africans not arabs!!! (Jun '08) 4 min thetruth 50,786
San Francisco or Detroit. bigger shythole? 4 min LGBT trumps black 9
The Moors, Egyptians and Phoenicians were not b... (Jun '14) 8 min thetruth 1,681
Will Le Pen repatriate Muslims from france? 14 min dcool 112
Psychotic Armed Lives Matter 18 min Tacticool Libs No... 2
New Far right POTUS , ISIS is Celebrating !!! 19 min dcool 92
King tut's tomb 24 min dcool 113
Are black people really the real jews? (Oct '12) 35 min thetruth 1,313
According to the one drop rule, white "people" ... 1 hr Snap 75
News White rage and racist thought: How history puts... 5 hr KIP 56
More from around the web