I feel sorry for Black Christians!

Level 8

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#1527 May 8, 2013
Phoenix wrote:
<quoted text>
What do you believe submission means? I hope you realize that men of God are to be submissive to God.
Submission simply means to stop rebelling against GOD and accept His Mercy and Grace. Simple. GOD Created humanity and gave us life. Submission means accepting that life and stop destroying what GOD created. Rebellion is suicide. Submission is Success. Submission is Prayer.

Level 8

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#1528 May 8, 2013
Samoan Irish wrote:
<quoted text>simple.. Every1.. Again.. Every1 is damned to hell.. But it depends how much 1 sins.. The greater the sin.. The greater the torment.. So if u really want to go to heaven.. Ur tounge and fingerz.. Ur eyez will all need to be pulled out.. Feed to dogs.. 100 times over.. For saying 1 bad word to the almighty.. If not.. Oh well..
Saying one bad word to GOD merits death.

“me! chee hoo! LOL!”

Level 6

Since: Oct 09

New Zealand

#1529 May 8, 2013
Abdurratln wrote:
<quoted text>
Saying one bad word to GOD merits death.
why i would become a muslim first.. Than a faggat godless americunt.. Cant mess with him.. Look what happen to lucifer.. Lol.. St micheal.. Rebuke that cussing demon.. So shall i..

Since: Jul 10

Minneapolis, MN

#1530 May 8, 2013
Samoan Irish wrote:
<quoted text>abortions.. About a million babies die a day.. In fact i believe they will populate heaven.. Populating.. The damned angels.. Which 1 saint said.. Able to blot out the sun.. That many.. Until the numberz r populated.. Then the anti christ will come.. And punish the aborterz.. Cut there tounges, pull out there eyes.. Etc..
to me, if a fetus or infant dies. he or she goes to heaven. or what ever paradise the parents believe in.
motts

Colne, UK

#1531 May 9, 2013
emperorjohn wrote:
<quoted text> Sending people to hell for not believing in him is not a loving thing to do. According to your bible, a murderer who is saved can go to heaven, but a Buddhist who has never committed any crime gets a trip to hell. How is that justice?
Jesus dying on the cross so that we can receive forgiveness for our sins is a loving thing to do. Heaven or hell is a choice.

A murderer who has repented can go to heaven and only God would know within his heart if he has truly repented.

An individual who is a buddhist and has never heard the gospel will be more than likely judged according to their knowledge of rights and wrongs. God is just and wise enough to know not to throw someone in hell who has never received the gospel.

Those who choose not to repent and accept salvation whether murderers or buddhists or anyone else will face God's judgement.

Our Savior Jesus Christ has said, "Judge not lest ye be judged" God decides where we go. God knows our hearts, God knows us more than anyone therefore only HE Can judge.
motts

Colne, UK

#1532 May 9, 2013
emperorjohn wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes it is sexism. The bible gives husbands power over their wives irrespective of their level of intelligence. Telling women they have to be submissive to men is telling them that they are inferior. Most American families have a husband and wife that come to compromises instead of the bible inspired tyranny.Married Women are not allowed to get divorces or to control their own property by biblical law
Emperor said:
"Telling women they have to be submissive to men is telling them that they are inferior."

Motts said:
This is a wild interpretation of an arrangement which many families across the world are happy with.
My previous post explained that succinctly, so we will have to agree to disagree on that.

Emperor said:

"Married Women are not allowed to get divorces or to control their own property by biblical law"

Motts said:

There are circumstances in which women can get a divorce. The Bible suggests that “marital unfaithfulness” is the only scriptural reason that warrants God’s permission for divorce and remarriage. Many different interpretations exist among Christian teachings as to the exact definition of "marital unfaithfulness." The Greek word for marital unfaithfulness found in Matthew 5:32 and Matthew 19:9 translates to mean any form of sexual immorality including adultery, prostitution, fornication, pornography, and incest. Since the sexual union is such a crucial part of the marriage covenant, breaking that bond seems to be a permissible, biblical grounds for divorce.

Physical abuse could also be viewed as breaking marriage vows to love and honour one's wife and could also be grounds for divorce. With regards to property, you have to show me that portion of scripture and I will discuss it further.

“Sombrero Galaxy”

Level 8

Since: Jan 10

I'm An Illegal Alien

#1533 May 10, 2013
motts wrote:
<quoted text>
Emperor said:
"Telling women they have to be submissive to men is telling them that they are inferior."
Motts said:
This is a wild interpretation of an arrangement which many families across the world are happy with.
My previous post explained that succinctly, so we will have to agree to disagree on that.
Emperor said:
"Married Women are not allowed to get divorces or to control their own property by biblical law"
Motts said:
There are circumstances in which women can get a divorce. The Bible suggests that “marital unfaithfulness” is the only scriptural reason that warrants God’s permission for divorce and remarriage. Many different interpretations exist among Christian teachings as to the exact definition of "marital unfaithfulness." The Greek word for marital unfaithfulness found in Matthew 5:32 and Matthew 19:9 translates to mean any form of sexual immorality including adultery, prostitution, fornication, pornography, and incest. Since the sexual union is such a crucial part of the marriage covenant, breaking that bond seems to be a permissible, biblical grounds for divorce.
Physical abuse could also be viewed as breaking marriage vows to love and honour one's wife and could also be grounds for divorce. With regards to property, you have to show me that portion of scripture and I will discuss it further.
Women are not allowed to divorce because of unfaithfulness. Men are allowed to have other wives in the bible. King Solomon had 700 wives and 300 concubines. Only men are allowed to divorce.
Phoenix

Houston, TX

#1534 May 10, 2013
emperorjohn wrote:
<quoted text>Women are not allowed to divorce because of unfaithfulness. Men are allowed to have other wives in the bible. King Solomon had 700 wives and 300 concubines. Only men are allowed to divorce.
Are you knowledgable about the 613 commandments that Jews adhere to, sir?

“me! chee hoo! LOL!”

Level 6

Since: Oct 09

New Zealand

#1535 May 12, 2013
emperorjohn wrote:
<quoted text>
Women are not allowed to divorce because of unfaithfulness. Men are allowed to have other wives in the bible. King Solomon had 700 wives and 300 concubines. Only men are allowed to divorce.
i guess all dat faggat porn.. Not satsifying u.. Huh homo.. Lol.. When ur soul.. Submits to gods will.. Man finds rest.. Shud up u ugly bastard
motts

Colne, UK

#1536 May 12, 2013
emperorjohn wrote:
<quoted text>
Women are not allowed to divorce because of unfaithfulness. Men are allowed to have other wives in the bible. King Solomon had 700 wives and 300 concubines. Only men are allowed to divorce.
The old testament is Judaism, hence King Solomon and his wives.

The new testament is where Christianity begins.

You need to at least use scriptures to back up assertions with regards to Christianity.
motts

Colne, UK

#1537 May 12, 2013
Samoan Irish wrote:
<quoted text>i guess all dat faggat porn.. Not satsifying u.. Huh homo.. Lol.. When ur soul.. Submits to gods will.. Man finds rest.. Shud up u ugly bastard
Come on; no need to be abusive.

Since: Jul 10

Minneapolis, MN

#1538 May 12, 2013
motts wrote:
<quoted text>
The old testament is Judaism, hence King Solomon and his wives.
The new testament is where Christianity begins.
You need to at least use scriptures to back up assertions with regards to Christianity.
thing is, if the OT was not important for Christians to listen to. it would not have been included in the bible.
.
meaning that it is just as important to Christians to listen to and OBEY. just like a Christian needs to do to the NT.
motts

Colne, UK

#1539 May 13, 2013
Sangelia wrote:
<quoted text>
thing is, if the OT was not important for Christians to listen to. it would not have been included in the bible.
.
meaning that it is just as important to Christians to listen to and OBEY. just like a Christian needs to do to the NT.
I was not belittling the old testament in any way or saying that it is totally irrelevant to a Christian's life.

The key to understanding this issue is knowing that the Old Testament law was given to the nation of Israel, not to Christians. Some of the laws were to reveal to the Israelites how to obey and please God (the Ten Commandments, for example). Some of the laws were to show the Israelites how to worship God and atone for sin (the sacrificial system). Some of the laws were intended to make the Israelites distinct from other nations (the food and clothing rules). None of the Old Testament law is binding on us today. When Jesus died on the cross, He put an end to the Old Testament law (Romans 10:4; Galatians 3:23-25; Ephesians 2:15).

In place of the Old Testament law, we are under the law of Christ (Galatians 6:2), which is to “love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind…and to love your neighbor as yourself”(Matthew 22:37-39). If we obey those two commands, we will be fulfilling all that Christ requires of us:“All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments”(Matthew 22:40). Now, this does not mean the Old Testament law is irrelevant today. Many of the commands in the Old Testament law fall into the categories of “loving God” and “loving your neighbor.” The Old Testament law can be a good guidepost for knowing how to love God and knowing what goes into loving your neighbor. At the same time, to say that the Old Testament law applies to Christians today is incorrect. The Old Testament law is a unit (James 2:10). Either all of it applies, or none of it applies. If Christ fulfilled some of it, such as the sacrificial system, He fulfilled all of it.

“This is love for God: to obey his commands. And his commands are not burdensome”(1 John 5:3). The Ten Commandments were essentially a summary of the entire Old Testament law. Nine of the Ten Commandments are clearly repeated in the New Testament (all except the command to observe the Sabbath day). Obviously, if we are loving God, we will not be worshipping false gods or bowing down before idols. If we are loving our neighbors, we will not be murdering them, lying to them, committing adultery against them, or coveting what belongs to them. The purpose of the Old Testament law is to convict people of our inability to keep the law and point us to our need for Jesus Christ as Savior (Romans 7:7-9; Galatians 3:24). The Old Testament law was never intended by God to be the universal law for all people for all of time. We are to love God and love our neighbors. If we obey those two commands faithfully, we will be upholding all that God requires of us.

“Sombrero Galaxy”

Level 8

Since: Jan 10

I'm An Illegal Alien

#1540 May 14, 2013
motts wrote:
<quoted text>
The old testament is Judaism, hence King Solomon and his wives.
The new testament is where Christianity begins.
You need to at least use scriptures to back up assertions with regards to Christianity.
Christianity is comprised of both the old and new testaments.
Bayou City

Houston, TX

#1541 May 14, 2013
sassyntrashy wrote:
You notice have they give their lives to God while he gives them nothing in return lol? And they always swear that God will bless them for believing in him but yet most live in severe poverty! I feel like this if there is a god and he wants my love then he needs to pay or it! I still don't see why people have so much faith in a mythical man that has not shown he cares about them.
God doesn't pay any attention to negroes because they don't have souls and he didn't create them. Man did by splicing his genes with apes several milleniums ago to have a strong back and weak mind which made them suitable for work as upright walking beasts of burden. Too bad man didn't realize what a horrendous mistake he was making back then. Tampering with the forces of nature to create a beast of such vile savagedry did not turn out to be one of mankind's wisest moves. SMH
twizzy

Detroit, MI

#1542 Feb 9, 2015
BlackDevil_ Lucifer 666 wrote:
<quoted text>
So, do you agree that blacks descend from Ham?
Wrong shem and ham were brown and dark skin so some blacks are descendants of shem(hebrews)ham( Egyptian pharaohs,a black person could be from either or
twizzy

Detroit, MI

#1543 Feb 9, 2015
Bayou City wrote:
<quoted text> God doesn't pay any attention to negroes because they don't have souls and he didn't create them. Man did by splicing his genes with apes several milleniums ago to have a strong back and weak mind which made them suitable for work as upright walking beasts of burden. Too bad man didn't realize what a horrendous mistake he was making back then. Tampering with the forces of nature to create a beast of such vile savagedry did not turn out to be one of mankind's wisest moves. SMH
Your stupid nimrod a black man was the worlds first king (gen10.verse8

Since: Oct 09

Location hidden

#1544 Feb 9, 2015
Bayou City wrote:
<quoted text> God doesn't pay any attention to negroes because they don't have souls and he didn't create them. Man did by splicing his genes with apes several milleniums ago to have a strong back and weak mind which made them suitable for work as upright walking beasts of burden. Too bad man didn't realize what a horrendous mistake he was making back then. Tampering with the forces of nature to create a beast of such vile savagedry did not turn out to be one of mankind's wisest moves. SMH
How did I miss this sick post? And blacks came before whites so you didn't create us we created you.

“me! chee hoo! LOL!”

Level 6

Since: Oct 09

Los Angeles, CA

#1545 Feb 9, 2015
sassyntrashy wrote:
<quoted text>
How did I miss this sick post? And blacks came before whites so you didn't create us we created you.
Wasn't Adam and eve created in the image of god... not monkeys???

that's what we abrjamic believers believe in...

Since: Oct 09

Location hidden

#1546 Feb 9, 2015
Samoan Irish wrote:
<quoted text>
Wasn't Adam and eve created in the image of god... not monkeys???
that's what we abrjamic believers believe in...
I never heard of this. And I don't believe in creationism anyways.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
What would u do if u found out u had a black an... 2 min Lady Majestic Rising 36
My Brothas in Baltimore are Holding it DOWN!!!! 3 min Savant 271
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min EditorAtLarge 1,684,353
president donald trump dead at age 71 9 min el rey de los cam... 21
Teenapers courageously carjack 81 yo woman 12 min Jake 3
News Booker slams DHS secretary's 'amnesia' on Trump... 12 min Doe 112
Racist White People on MLK Day. 15 min Savant 127
Bets on how long shutdown will last... 22 min Joey 30
WHITE FOLKS: YOU need to know what King Knew! 29 min Savant 160
Democrats decide that illegal immigrants are mo... 51 min el rey de los cam... 29
I need proof that the Ancient Egyptians Were No... (Oct '07) 2 hr dreamhunk 37,819
More from around the web