Why do blacks claim to be the true Is...
African AE

Johannesburg, South Africa

#1506 Oct 19, 2013
truth wrote:
<quoted text>
racist shill - all you're doing is spitting hate instead of factual truth .. and no adman's meaning in Hebrew is human being .. IT CAN also mean red or earth but its original meaning is human being .. and besides what in the hell makes you think that Adam was Hebrew that was waaaaaaaaay before Abraham and Issac .. and those blacks are in the right place .. doing everything OUTSIDE OF THE WORLD YOU'RE PEOPLE HAVE CREATED!!.. looks to me like you need to read Daniel and John in Revelation on their description of christ .. it sure as hell wasn't long blonde and curly haired NOR RED hahaha .. ignorant fool ..
Adam means red in Hebrew!

Level 7

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#1507 Oct 20, 2013
No does not, Alf.

Level 7

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#1508 Oct 20, 2013
Not IT does not!,Alf.

Level 2

Since: May 11

United States

#1509 Oct 20, 2013
LOL you dont realized that you are placing Negroes in Palestine when you say we are Canaan line. LMAO Thats why racist bible preachers in America were instructed to take it back and dont use it as a reason why we were enslaved. They knew that little info would led the world to see if we habe some Isrselites among us too.
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#1510 Oct 20, 2013
unfazed wrote:
No does not, Alf.
Yes it does!
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#1511 Oct 20, 2013
Punchojr wrote:
LOL you dont realized that you are placing Negroes in Palestine when you say we are Canaan line. LMAO Thats why racist bible preachers in America were instructed to take it back and dont use it as a reason why we were enslaved. They knew that little info would led the world to see if we habe some Isrselites among us too.
Canaanites,Phoenicians,Israeli tes were never black but Eurasian Caucasians! AA do not have Middle Eastern DNA! You all are of West,Central African origin which not a teeny drop of Middle Eastern DNA! Look on Youtube!
Real ancient Canaanites painted on the ancient walls of Egypt:

www.dqhall.com/Abraham_in_Egypt/

Level 2

Since: May 11

United States

#1512 Oct 21, 2013
Ae be quiet talking to me. Ive shown you Negro bones found in Upper Mesopatamia and Negro bones found in Lachish. You still bring up outer influwnce dna as if majority didnt held up their pure Dna and migrated back intact. Your claims my be true but still doesnot exclude that we was there. If you keep going you gonna dig yourself in a whole with me.

RIGHT OR WRONG have I shown you source of Negro bones in those area and im not talking Proto Saharan or Natufians?
Kay 5

UK

#1513 Oct 21, 2013
Jews are mideastern semitic peoples,though some black africans share proximity with them.
Kay 5

UK

#1515 Oct 21, 2013
I dont doubt Jews in the present state of Israel to be descendants of biblical jews.
Kay 5

UK

#1516 Oct 21, 2013
Negroes Are Animals wrote:
Negroes are not human, so it is impossible for them to be the first Jews. Blacks belong in the zoo.
Quit the ranting
Truth

Woodbridge, VA

#1518 Oct 21, 2013
The funny thing is is that you all believe in a book that is fiction what is sad is that wars are fought people die over bs look at religion it's based on the winter solstice the sun!

“Because Knowledge Is Power”

Level 1

Since: Oct 13

Location hidden

#1519 Oct 21, 2013
Since when?
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#1520 Oct 22, 2013
Punchojr wrote:
Ae be quiet talking to me. Ive shown you Negro bones found in Upper Mesopatamia and Negro bones found in Lachish. You still bring up outer influwnce dna as if majority didnt held up their pure Dna and migrated back intact. Your claims my be true but still doesnot exclude that we was there. If you keep going you gonna dig yourself in a whole with me.
RIGHT OR WRONG have I shown you source of Negro bones in those area and im not talking Proto Saharan or Natufians?
The bones found at Lachish were Bedouin and most of them were Arabs according to skull analysis!
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#1521 Oct 22, 2013
Populus alba interficiens wrote:
Hmm I never heard of any black people claiming they are isrealites if they are from east africa however they are likely to have isrealite mixed in their genes.. as the isrealite people were slaves to the egyptians
Um...there is no proof any Israelites were ever in Egypt! Only the Hyksos are mentioned by the Egyptians. According to the Jewish historian, Josephus Flavuis, the Hyksos were the Hebrews! The Hyksos/Hebrews ruled Egypt for over 100 years!

“Because Knowledge Is Power”

Level 1

Since: Oct 13

Location hidden

#1522 Oct 22, 2013
African AE wrote:
<quoted text>Um...there is no proof any Israelites were ever in Egypt! Only the Hyksos are mentioned by the Egyptians. According to the Jewish historian, Josephus Flavuis, the Hyksos were the Hebrews! The Hyksos/Hebrews ruled Egypt for over 100 years!
History isn't"his story" no one will truely ever know
Malic

Denver, CO

#1523 Oct 22, 2013
AE, did you do a close examination of the pictures in that link you provided? They looked brown-skinned and Asiatic, Blacks. I mean, I can show more "clearer" pictures of African slaves with:

Cornrows
Afros
Thick Lips
Wide Nose

These people were Blacks, and not Caucasian or Eurasians. You have a fundamental lack of understanding that, prior to 1200 B.C., the Ancient World was Brown and Black People. Hamites Sons seem to be the darker people and Shemites were Brown-skinned, Asiatic, so was Japheth initial descendants before they became Whites.

If you follow Biblical narrative, you will see Hamites and Shemites mixed together and Japheth descendants migrated North to colder climates.

This is how the middle east go populated, coming out of Africa. Those were the Japheth descendants that went North and settled Europe/Caucasus Mountain etc.

All those were Japheth descendants that went North. Those are who become Eurasians, Greeks, Romans and now, White Europeans and Americans.

It then becomes a conflict in narrative when you try to say the Slaves or the Israelites were Eurasians because the Eurasians wasn't a "population of people" prior to 1200 B.C. They were still just Albinos, migrating little by little to the North. It was their recessive genes that cause them to go North to colder climates where the sun shine less. You see?

I'm telling you true history, dude. I know you want to look at Haplo markers but you got the artifacts, pictorials and the Bible laid out before you to put it all together in a logical flow.

And the History shows the eurasins were the Gentiles, dude. Think about it......if the Eurasians were the Israelites, then EVERY White ethnicity of the Caucasus regions would have known about it. However, the Romans knew NOTHING about the Israelites. They knew the Eurasians and Greeks though.

The famous Roman Historian, Cornelius Tacticus, said the "PEOPLE OF [HIS] TIME BELIEVE THE HEBREW ISRAELITES TO BE A PEOPLE OF ETHIOPIAN DESCENT."

He would NOT have said that if the Eurasians was the Israelites. He was one if the great Roman Historian of his time. Surely he would have known instantly if the Eurasians were the Israelites. He knew Gomer descendants, and describe their origins as weak White men until Black Men raped their women, impregnated them and gave them children with a better built and physique.

It was as if the Gomerites need the Black men to impregnated their women to give better children to their stock.

So all this historu is true and can be verified that the Israelites were, indeed, Blacks. And their descendants today, are the Black Americans and not the only ones, though. Other blacks makes up the rest. Not Whites.
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#1524 Oct 22, 2013
Malic wrote:
AE, did you do a close examination of the pictures in that link you provided? They looked brown-skinned and Asiatic, Blacks. I mean, I can show more "clearer" pictures of African slaves with:
Cornrows
Afros
Thick Lips
Wide Nose
These people were Blacks, and not Caucasian or Eurasians. You have a fundamental lack of understanding that, prior to 1200 B.C., the Ancient World was Brown and Black People. Hamites Sons seem to be the darker people and Shemites were Brown-skinned, Asiatic, so was Japheth initial descendants before they became Whites.
If you follow Biblical narrative, you will see Hamites and Shemites mixed together and Japheth descendants migrated North to colder climates.
This is how the middle east go populated, coming out of Africa. Those were the Japheth descendants that went North and settled Europe/Caucasus Mountain etc.
All those were Japheth descendants that went North. Those are who become Eurasians, Greeks, Romans and now, White Europeans and Americans.
It then becomes a conflict in narrative when you try to say the Slaves or the Israelites were Eurasians because the Eurasians wasn't a "population of people" prior to 1200 B.C. They were still just Albinos, migrating little by little to the North. It was their recessive genes that cause them to go North to colder climates where the sun shine less. You see?
I'm telling you true history, dude. I know you want to look at Haplo markers but you got the artifacts, pictorials and the Bible laid out before you to put it all together in a logical flow.
And the History shows the eurasins were the Gentiles, dude. Think about it......if the Eurasians were the Israelites, then EVERY White ethnicity of the Caucasus regions would have known about it. However, the Romans knew NOTHING about the Israelites. They knew the Eurasians and Greeks though.
The famous Roman Historian, Cornelius Tacticus, said the "PEOPLE OF [HIS] TIME BELIEVE THE HEBREW ISRAELITES TO BE A PEOPLE OF ETHIOPIAN DESCENT."
He would NOT have said that if the Eurasians was the Israelites. He was one if the great Roman Historian of his time. Surely he would have known instantly if the Eurasians were the Israelites. He knew Gomer descendants, and describe their origins as weak White men until Black Men raped their women, impregnated them and gave them children with a better built and physique.
It was as if the Gomerites need the Black men to impregnated their women to give better children to their stock.
So all this historu is true and can be verified that the Israelites were, indeed, Blacks. And their descendants today, are the Black Americans and not the only ones, though. Other blacks makes up the rest. Not Whites.
Um...forensic experts recreate the ancient Hebrews using their real skulls:
www.timesofisrael.com/meet-delilah-tv-series-...
Samaritans who have lived in Israel for over 3000 years:
www.israelite-samaritans.com
Indigenous Palestinian Jews who originate from the Israelite Tribe of Judah:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ben-_Zakai.jpg
These are the INDIGENOUS people of Israel. If you are genuinely related to Hebrews you MUST be related to them!
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#1525 Oct 22, 2013
THE REAL DESCENDANTS OF THE ISRAELITE TRIBE OF JUDAH:
www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ben_Zakai.jpg

Jesus was from the Tribe of Judah!
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#1526 Oct 22, 2013
Grandfather of Middle Eastern people and the very first modern humans in the Middle East,Europe and North Africa, CRO-MAGNON:
www.sciencephoto.com/media/481366/view

According to the very latest DNA testing on Ashkenazi Jews by Dr. Ehran Elhaik, Ashkenazi Jews originated in the Caucasus Mountains,from Mesopotamian Jews,Judeans and Roman-Greco Jews. All of these people carry the extremely INDIGENOUS Middle Eastern Haplogroup J2! So therefore Ashkenazi Jews ARE REAL JEWS!

Level 3

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#1527 Oct 22, 2013
African AE wrote:
<quoted text>Um..........nope the word LEPROUS in Hebrew means any kind of skin problem not necessary leprosy.
and the skin disorder suffered by these people in the bible was Vitiligo. Leprosy in modern terms is called Hansen's Disease This is what Hansen's Disease looks like Africa AE
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Leprosy.jpg

Hansen disease
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons...

Did you notice that the hands and Feet and face of these leprosy victims does not match up to the leprosy in the bible.

it is a different kind of leprosy in the bible it should be called Vitiligo instead of leprosy

notice the victims skin color is not white at all it still keeps the same complexion

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Democrats easily duped into endorsing Sharia la... 45 min Savant 25
What color was the first man on earth? (Nov '07) 55 min Johnathan Angel F... 897
News Being conservative is not being racist 56 min Savant 470
Why do affluent black men frequently marry whit... (Jul '12) 1 hr Sok 129
Many blacks are going to win Oscars this year. 1 hr Jax 4
White guys are better in bed - according to bla... 1 hr Savant 82
News King's legacy celebrated as Trump, Lewis duel l... 1 hr Savant 354
This good ol' boy never meant no harm! 3 hr Drilling for the ... 1,287
There Are Not Even 1 Billion Whites On Earth 4 hr Israelite Suprema... 41
Why is the media pushing interracial relationsh... (Sep '14) 6 hr UnderstandPeople 629
More from around the web