Racism is not the cause of black failure
Clark

Bristol, UK

#70 Jan 19, 2013
Carol wrote:
<quoted text>
The blks and whites in my offline corruption situation are equally the blame....
Blacks were selli.g each other out even in slavery..
Are you saying that if whites disappeared ..
Blacks would live in Paradise...
I have yet to see a perfect group of people, who are without strife etc...
Some just more than others...
the fact that there are nlk men and women.
mocking me as they help racists prey on me as a
widow witj young kids...
Lets me know that the wicked are in every culture.
It's hard to live in paradise with brains as complexed as they are with the range of human emotions. But white supremacy has no excuse and if you think this is the best the world can get that's sad. It's also sad that you believe that anyone has to be evil to get success. A lot of musicians and artists will often believe that being damaged or depressed is what's fueling their talent but often than not it's just natural ability and talent minus the bs. You don't have to be an azzhole to be successful. Whites don't have to call people racist names etc, Anyway I am bored now, maybe some other time I will continue.:)
Carol

Chicago, IL

#71 Jan 19, 2013
Clark wrote:
<quoted text>
So you like a democratic liberal country, where it's the land of the free, some like countries like China. Where its countries are a little stricter, but produce highly educated individuals with money, skills to travel and set up business in the USA and other places. I have been to a place in Asia and maybe because I was not a citizen or the place was not China, it was a place I had no problem in but who knows what it's like to get a house or job. Anyway since China's economy is slowing they are trying to push more of it's people into the middle classes and moving away from steel works manual labor and more into the tech world which is dumb and the reason why Britain had to succumb to selling arms and things of that nature because they went away from the fishing industry, mining and other using manual jobs like that. Now China is moving into importing, which is not so great since a lot of Europeans countries who import more than they export crashed. I think China is slowly moving into a more liberal country since to they want to be richer and need more of its people to thrive to spend on their economy.
But you have to know that several 100 million in China in dire poverty...

People tolerate oppression but noone wants to be oppressed...

China like most socialist communist type countries rules thru fear with an iron fist...

Those people even had internet restrictions...

Their reproductive ability is owned by the state...

Women are being drug off and given abortions when disobeying the state.

No freedom of religion or speech.
Carol

Chicago, IL

#72 Jan 19, 2013
Clark wrote:
<quoted text>
It's hard to live in paradise with brains as complexed as they are with the range of human emotions. But white supremacy has no excuse and if you think this is the best the world can get that's sad. It's also sad that you believe that anyone has to be evil to get success. A lot of musicians and artists will often believe that being damaged or depressed is what's fueling their talent but often than not it's just natural ability and talent minus the bs. You don't have to be an azzhole to be successful. Whites don't have to call people racist names etc, Anyway I am bored now, maybe some other time I will continue.:)
You continue to add words to my posts....

I believe in the Bahamas, blks are in authority, they have freedoms and a pretty good life there...

Again, I answered a post that,said that China is more benevolent than America...

I say ridicuous, theyre not even benevolent to their own people.

“Africa”

Level 7

Since: Jan 12

Oakland

#73 Jan 19, 2013
typically black wrote:
<quoted text>
Name ONE currently successful African country that has NOT had ANY White influence in its construction?
You stupid fool, all Africans countries have had White "influence" in their construction, even the northern states. This goes whether they were "successful" or not, whether the influence was direct or not. The fact that you have so called "failed states" that have also have White "influence" means that this so called influence had and has nothing to do with whether a country is successful or not.
typically black wrote:
White folks put in road systems, showed blacks the wheel, built potable water facilities, brought agricultural and industrial innovation.
They took away their freedom, enslaved them, brutalized them, forced them to work slave wages, introduced malnutrition, lethal diseases, killed or exiled all the leaders that would have actually brought these countries into economic prosperity, and left the continent in an undeveloped state for the sole purpose of inciting their dependence on western countries for practically everything.

Africans already had road systems, wheels and agriculture. If Whites wanted to bring technical innovation to Africa, they should have done that and let the natives be.
typically black wrote:
There is not ONE African country today that can honestly say it was built from top to bottom solely by blacks. Not racism, FACT!!
So what? There is not one Western country that can say that it was built top to bottom without any contribution from Black labor and profits and materials that emerged from that.
typically black wrote:
Take South Africa, the blacks were nomadic and had been fighting each other for centuries over water rights and land, they were not a civilization, however you look at it.
Again, you stupid fool, you have no idea what you're talking about. Have you ever heard of Mapungabwe? Have you ever heard of the Toutswe? The Sotho-Tswana? These people were in South Africa and they were civilized.
typically black wrote:
Once White folks got in there it became the most successful African country in history, such was the wealth that WHITE people found there. SA always had the same potential, it just needed a people advanced enough to know what to do with the land, and that was White people.
Due to them enslaving Blacks, stealing from Blacks, warring with Blacks and the fact that they had access to knowledge and industrialized materials that Southern Africans had not yet been exposed to.
typically black wrote:
Anyway, SA is on its way to being another Zimbabwe in about a generation.
I don't what you mean to imply here. Zimbabwe's economic growth rate has been growing in recent years:

"The Zimbabwe economy grew an average 9.3 last year as it continued to bounce back after a decade of economic decline, and will expand further in 2012 on the back of increased output in mines and farms if the political climate remains stable, treasury estimates predict."

http://www.africanews.com/site/list_message/3...
Carol

Chicago, IL

#74 Jan 19, 2013
Clark wrote:
<quoted text>
It's hard to live in paradise with brains as complexed as they are with the range of human emotions. But white supremacy has no excuse and if you think this is the best the world can get that's sad. It's also sad that you believe that anyone has to be evil to get success. A lot of musicians and artists will often believe that being damaged or depressed is what's fueling their talent but often than not it's just natural ability and talent minus the bs. You don't have to be an azzhole to be successful. Whites don't have to call people racist names etc, Anyway I am bored now, maybe some other time I will continue.:)
Btw im thankful that I was around prior to integration..

Black men and women were united...

Our communities were indeed a village..

Everybody knew everybody and there werent drugs like now..

Even though the crime rate was a serious problem....

Ingregration was bad for the blk culture and community..

I believe forced integration was a bad idea.

“Africa”

Level 7

Since: Jan 12

Oakland

#75 Jan 19, 2013
Carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you aware that there was no war in Africa, when Africa slaves were taken from their homeland....
No, you're wrong. There was generally always warring going on in parts of West and Central Africa during the slave trade, especially in the 17th and 18th centuries when slave trading intensified.

You slaves were generally acquired as prisoners of war, which is why Europeans did what they could to incite more warring between African tribes to continue the slave trading.
Carol wrote:
Whites didn't use weapons to rake Africans..
Yes they did. Guns and even cannons were sometimes used on Africans. Sometimes you even had Europeans threaten to burn down African settlements if they did not fetch more slaves.
Carol wrote:
Africans sold out fellow Africans...even if from different tribes...
No, they didn't "sell out" anybody. They didn't sell out each other any more than Native Americans "sold out" Africans in America.

They would have seen themselves as completely different and unrelated people, which is why they could be no qualms in selling them.
Carol wrote:
Whites then came back and start raiding Africa of its natural resources...
blks are still selling each other out.
I can actually agree with this part.

“Africa”

Level 7

Since: Jan 12

Oakland

#76 Jan 19, 2013
Carol

Chicago, IL

#78 Jan 19, 2013
Bakari Neferu wrote:
<quoted text>
No, you're wrong. There was generally always warring going on in parts of West and Central Africa during the slave trade, especially in the 17th and 18th centuries when slave trading intensified.
You slaves were generally acquired as prisoners of war, which is why Europeans did what they could to incite more warring between African tribes to continue the slave trading.
<quoted text>
Yes they did. Guns and even cannons were sometimes used on Africans. Sometimes you even had Europeans threaten to burn down African settlements if they did not fetch more slaves.
<quoted text>
No, they didn't "sell out" anybody. They didn't sell out each other any more than Native Americans "sold out" Africans in America.
They would have seen themselves as completely different and unrelated people, which is why they could be no qualms in selling them.
<quoted text>
I can actually agree with this part.
Some Africans (auspy etc )mocked those African slaves, calling them goats etc...

Which only shows inferior intellect...trying to boost your self esteem by putting down fellow blks...

and even if they were tribal enemies..

Africans showed a lack of intelligence in selling them to whites...

as whites could have used them to get info about Africa in further raids of the land...

BTW you should never act as if the slaves were inferior..

Looks to me that you are saying that whites were able to use the non slaves to their advantage..

and of course I know of all the tribal wars as theyre still taking place in many parts of Africa etc.

“Africa”

Level 7

Since: Jan 12

Oakland

#79 Jan 19, 2013
Carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Some Africans (auspy etc )mocked those African slaves, calling them goats etc...
Which only shows inferior intellect...trying to boost your self esteem by putting down fellow blks...
and even if they were tribal enemies..
Africans showed a lack of intelligence in selling them to whites...
No they didn't. There was economic benefit to be gained from selling slaves especially since that was what was in demand. The selling of slaves had been going on for millennia in Africa. Doing so never really caused much damage to these peoples' economies.
Carol wrote:
as whites could have used them to get info about Africa in further raids of the land...
BTW you should never act as if the slaves were inferior..
I have never in my life acted, implied or thought that African slaves are inferior.
Carol wrote:
Looks to me that you are saying that whites were able to use the non slaves to their advantage..
What???
Carol wrote:
and of course I know of all the tribal wars as theyre still taking place in many parts of Africa etc.
What "tribal wars" are you talking about and in what "many" places?
Black Deal

United States

#80 Jan 19, 2013
Bakari Neferu wrote:
<quoted text>No they didn't. There was economic benefit to be gained from selling slaves especially since that was what was in demand. The selling of slaves had been going on for millennia in Africa. Doing so never really caused much damage to these peoples' economies.

Carol wrote, "as whites could have used them to get info about Africa in further raids of the land...
BTW you should never act as if the slaves were inferior.."

I have never in my life acted, implied or thought that African slaves are inferior.

Carol wrote, "Looks to me that you are saying that whites were able to use the non slaves to their advantage.."

What???

Carol wrote, "and of course I know of all the tribal wars as theyre still taking place in many parts of Africa etc."

What "tribal wars" are you talking about and in what "many" places?
Slavery still going on in Africa

“Leading the Revolution”

Level 6

Since: Oct 09

United States

#81 Jan 19, 2013
@Black Deal
I'm not sure I understand what you mean, if course farming was important, just look at Africa today.

“Leading the Revolution”

Level 6

Since: Oct 09

United States

#82 Jan 19, 2013
@Black Deal

I am a Liberian American, born to a Liberian father and an AA mother in Detroit Michigan. I have little control over what my ancestors did or didn't do. I don't date ir if that's what you mean!

“Leading the Revolution”

Level 6

Since: Oct 09

United States

#83 Jan 19, 2013
Slavery going on in Europe surely
Negroes are lobotomized

Tampa, FL

#85 Jan 19, 2013
Bakari Neferu wrote:
I don't click on Negroes links, Kunta.

As said, there is NO successful African country today that wasn't started by White people.
Negroes are lobotomized

Tampa, FL

#86 Jan 19, 2013
dkanela wrote:
Slavery going on in Europe surely
Maybe some illegal sex trafficking.

But if you want to see humanity at its worse go to Africa.

Even the UN condemned both sides in the Second Congo War for eating people.

If you want to see people living in mud huts, showering in cow piss, raping babies to cure disease, eating neighbors because it's 'traditional', then go to Africa. NOT Europe.
Negroes are lobotomized

Tampa, FL

#87 Jan 19, 2013
Axe V11 wrote:
<quoted text>
LMFAO! Exactly!
Negroes are the "original humans", right? Isn't that what all you Afrocentrics are spouting off about?
Why isn't Africa the guiding light for the rest of the world? Y'all should be MILLIONS of years beyond your lowly, fetid, stinking spawn -- you know, the rest of the planet.
I've said this time and again to our Negroes, and the answer is *crickets* lol

Even if you just accept Homo Sapiens, Negroes have been in Africa for around 200,000 years, and 70,000 as what are termed 'modern humans'.

White folks, depending on who you ask, have been around for 6,000 to 12,000 years, maybe a bit more, no one is sure. So, even if it was 20,000 years, Negroes have been around for TEN TIMES AS LONG AS WHITES lol

Even if you just accept 'moderns' Africans have been on their asses in Africa for 70,000 years, compared with the maximum of 20,000 years for Whites.

It is pathetic.

If Negroes were anywhere as near as advanced as White people have become in 20,000 years, then they should have walked the Moon 180,000 years ago - or if you accept the modern case, 50,000 years ago.

Everyone n the world, bare Negroes, know that they are a waste of oxygen and DNA.

Since: Oct 09

Location hidden

#88 Jan 19, 2013
dkanela wrote:
Slavery going on in Europe surely
And they probably have black african slaves. I have seen shows on this and the slaves are usually kids who get used for hard labor and sex.
Carol

Oak Park, MI

#89 Jan 19, 2013
dkanela wrote:
Slavery going on in Europe surely
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_slave_...

Horrific slavery is still taking place in parts of Africa
Carol

Oak Park, MI

#90 Jan 19, 2013
Bakari Neferu wrote:
<quoted text>
No, you're wrong. There was generally always warring going on in parts of West and Central Africa during the slave trade, especially in the 17th and 18th centuries when slave trading intensified.
You slaves were generally acquired as prisoners of war, which is why Europeans did what they could to incite more warring between African tribes to continue the slave trading.
<quoted text>
Yes they did. Guns and even cannons were sometimes used on Africans. Sometimes you even had Europeans threaten to burn down African settlements if they did not fetch more slaves.
<quoted text>
No, they didn't "sell out" anybody. They didn't sell out each other any more than Native Americans "sold out" Africans in America.
They would have seen themselves as completely different and unrelated people, which is why they could be no qualms in selling them.
<quoted text>
I can actually agree with this part.
BTW when I said no war, I meant whites didn't declare war on Africa and take POWs...

Africans sold their fellow Africans to whites...

and of course you know of the various genocide/wars that are still taking place...

Black Christians are being wiped out in Nigeria..

The world knows about the Sudandese taken into slavery.

Since: Aug 09

Location hidden

#91 Jan 19, 2013
ChiWiz wrote:
According to Dinesh D'Souza' racism is not the cause of Black People Failure but rather their their own dysfunctional culture.
I agree with him but Blacks need to be the ones to understand and agree with him. I really do wish Blacks would open their eyes and see their failures. I get so tired of pointing them out to you people, then being called a racist because I told you people the truth.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =NvFG6jH_ocYXX
(yarn)....another stab at negro superiority?....hey pig skin!..u may want to take a refresher course in basic american history

useless white turd

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 13 min An NFL Fan 1,279,006
Why english white south africans hate boer whit... (Jan '10) 15 min mixed women 82
Why do good looking black women like white men ... (Sep '12) 27 min Sephirena 7,507
White women and Pakistani men: The Latest Trend 31 min KING BEADY 1
All women prefer white men (Jan '15) 37 min jtr304 5,490
Why whites never talk about their origin? They... 49 min Bonny 113
News 74% of African-American children poverty strick... 51 min car007 33
Why do people hate jews??????? (Jan '12) 1 hr NotSoDivineMsM 106
White men are better lovers? 5 hr reply 620
**Clever/Funny Voicemail Greetings. Any Ideas?** (Jul '09) 6 hr The Editor 79
More from around the web