Why do Afrocentrists obsess over Egyp...

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#6378 Apr 22, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
You are making no dam sense AS USUAL. I've read and study this PPL. roughly 50,000 yrs they migrated from Africa. They remained in the Andaman Islands unmixed & untouched, until the British set up a penal colony. As usual the brit bastards massacred many of these peaceful, PPL. of African descent, while disease is slow making some of their groups go extinct. Hell, 4yr. old can look at these PPL. and know where or from who they descended.
http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5258/5465097025...
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-NKdiSAvrkck/UHNUAxt...
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-xAP_xov2gdw/UHNHt-i...
http://www.dinodia.com/photos/ADA-141675.jpg
Then why is their DNA 100% Eurasian, boy?

You're 100% schmuck.

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#6379 Apr 22, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course they're pushing it back. You just can't trust these PPL. Only a insane person would say Europe has older civilizations than Africa. Unless, Africans were already in Europe ( of course we know they've found African skulls in pre-historic Europe).
What the racists want you to believe is Africans ceased being African when they migrated around and populated the world. See, they can't deny we all come from Africa, so they make up some pseudoscience that disconnects Africa with the rest of the world
We Are The World... you give that song new meaning... Everyone is black, because people can't evolve, and so negrito were black, but then suddenly whitey appears... from WHERE? LOL... and only whitey is Eurasian, everyone else is African...

What a moron. You would be laughed out of ANY college with that bull$hit.

And you are NOT a Hebrew!
Anonymous

Ashburn, VA

#6380 Apr 22, 2013
Ancient Egyptian wrote:
Egyptian writings debunk a black Egypt.
Black people were not Ancient Egyptians, Although some were but they were a minority!
Ancient Egyptians = Modern Egyptians PERIOD!
Multitudes of Depictions of EURASIAN Egyptians far outweigh the black 'Nubian' depictions.
Now we will us the writings to disprove this Afrocentric nonsense..
http://jewishchristianlit.com/Texts/ANEmrg/pB...
These particular texts were written on papyrus from Thebes. It dates from the 20th dynasty (Fox) or between the 12th and 11th centuries, BC. I t contains three poem groups. The first (“Reticent Lovers”) hangs together with a single plot. The second three poems (“Come to your sister”) are variations on a theme. The third (the “Nakht-Sobek” poems) are less obviously connected other than by the larger topic of love.
Here are some passages from RETICENT LOVERS
[First Stanza]
Boy
a There is no one like my sister,
the most lovely of all women.
b She is Sirius rising
heralding the rising Nile.
Shining, light-skinned, exquisite,
her eyes constantly wandering.
c Her lips speak sweetly
but do not ramble.
Her neck is long, her breasts white
Now lets go to Edwin Smith's surgical papyrus
http://www.touregypt.net/edwinsmithsurgical.h... Seven:
Second examination: If then, thou findest that the flesh of that man has developed fever from wound which is in the sutures of his skull, while that man has developed ty from that wound, thou shouldst lay hand upon him . Shouldst find his countenance is clammy with sweat , the ligaments his neck are tense, his face ruddy , his teeth and his back, the odor of the chest of his head is like the bkn (urine) of sheep, his mouth is bound ,(and) both his eyebrows are drawn , while his face is as if he wept.
His face is ruddy" (tms), means that the color of his face is red, like the color of tms fruit .
Blacks with a red face? ;)
----------
Akenaten stela describes Queen Nefertiti(his Wife)
"And the Heiress, Great in the Palace, Fair of Face, Adorned with the Double Plumes, Mistress of Happiness, Endowed with Favors, at hearing whose voice the King rejoices, the Chief Wife of the King, his beloved, the Lady of the Two Lands, Neferneferuaten-Nefertiti, May she live for Ever and Always"
Read more: http://www.touregypt.net/featurestories/nefer...
More to come :)
Next!
It has already been scientifically proven that ancient Egyptians are more related to Eritreans, Oromos, Bejas, and Nubians than the current population. Keep fighting the losing fight. Next you'll be trying to feed the world the lies that the afrikaaner settler population in South Africa is more indigenous to South Africa than Africans. Wait.. You already made those claims and you were debunked by your own europig scientists http://www.historytoday.com/shula-marks/south...
trollslayer

Chicago, IL

#6381 Apr 23, 2013
Sinajuavi wrote:
<quoted text>
Not true, jackass. You're pretending that humans don't evolve. Then how did all those Eurasians get to be different from Africans? You pretend humans can't change... so how did they change? Moron.
DNA confirms that all the people migrating out from OOA were Eurasians, 100%. Including Australoids, negritos, Melanesians. As Eurasian as Swedes or Japanese or Persians.
And you are NOT a Hebrew!
1)Australoids, negritos, Melanesians are of African descent 2)if a group stays unmixed, they will change that much, they will remain pretty close to the original OOA ancestors. 3) who the hell said I was Hebrew....you are insane. No wonder ur wife divorced you. She's a Smart woman.
trollslayer

Chicago, IL

#6382 Apr 23, 2013
Sinajuavi wrote:
<quoted text>
Then why is their DNA 100% Eurasian, boy?
You're 100% schmuck.
Blacks once entered Europe & Asia...you big dummy. They could've help it...cuz they were on earth 1st. What part of don't u get.
Get out outta' the AA forum...DIVORCED loser, who i've shown to be here posting on the holidays,(e.g. Thxgvg. & X-mas.)
trollslayer

Chicago, IL

#6383 Apr 23, 2013
Anonymous wrote:
<quoted text> It has already been scientifically proven that ancient Egyptians are more related to Eritreans, Oromos, Bejas, and Nubians than the current population. Keep fighting the losing fight. Next you'll be trying to feed the world the lies that the afrikaaner settler population in South Africa is more indigenous to South Africa than Africans. Wait.. You already made those claims and you were debunked by your own europig scientists http://www.historytoday.com/shula-marks/south...
Good post....actually there has been talk of "the afrikaaner settler population".....I know, it's INSANE.
Anonymous

Ashburn, VA

#6384 Apr 23, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
Good post....actually there has been talk of "the afrikaaner settler population".....I know, it's INSANE.
Afrikaners are a european ethnic group who renamed themselves "Afrikaners" to make their theft of African land and far fetched claims of being African look more legitimate. They are the architects of apartheid in South Africa.

Europeans only signs in South Africa during apartheid: http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_HKGbCMyB6Nw/TBV2vlz... http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_8mWPotEvLjM/S-cKrh0... http://farm7.staticflickr.com/6071/6036535780... http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_2rTAfHY6xaM/S_2L-PO...

Apartheid has ended and they no longer claim to be european. Now the claim to be African, as African as all the other African tribes.
Anonymous

Ashburn, VA

#6385 Apr 23, 2013
The nazikaner filth get angry and throw tantrums when real Africans set them straight:
"We are not all Africans, black people are!"
"Henry Ford once said,“You can have any colour as long as it is black”. Similarly, native inhabitants of Africa say,“You can be an African in any colour as long as he is black.” There has been a sudden demand for an African to come in a variety of colours. During days of slavery when an African was a commodity traded over the counter, there was never a demand for him in any colour but black. There is now an attempt in the 21st century to redefine the colour scheme of an African. Whites want to be classified as African. Whites have been relentless in their attempts at historical revisionism in respect of the definition of “African” since the 1994 democratic dispensation, and their efforts appeared to have intensified after the collective hoorah of reconciliation had dissipated. Historical revisionism is generally a legitimate re-evaluation of existing understanding and knowledge of particular historical aspects in order to correct any distortions; but there are also those with deliberate motives to revise history in order to mislead or reflect them in favourable light. Historically, the term “African” never had any ambiguous meaning. To Africans today it still does not have any ambiguous meaning. Africans across the continent and in the diaspora have long understood its meaning to refer to them as black people. African leaders from all walks of life who waged a relentless struggle against the thuggery of colonialism in the continent, were of one mind with regard to who Africans were. The fight against colonialism was to liberate Africans from the thuggery visited upon them by Europeans who had arrogated to themselves the power to rule with brute force and dominate vast territories of the African continent." http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/sentletsediaka...
Anonymous

Ashburn, VA

#6386 Apr 23, 2013
Continued:

"When both Arabs and Europeans enslaved Africans and traded them as disposable commodities there was never any misunderstanding with regard to who Africans were. These were native inhabitants of Africa who were regarded as sub- human, and even “savages and barbarians”, as the British warlord Winston Churchill perceived them. These are people who in historical texts have been described as “African slaves”. Neither Arabs nor European slave-masters ever imagined themselves as Africans. When an order for an African slave arrived, it was clear that it was a commoditised black person who needed to be captured and a price put on his head."
Anonymous

Ashburn, VA

#6387 Apr 23, 2013
Continued:
"On the occasion of Nelson Mandela’s inauguration as the first democratically elected president of the Republic of South Africa, he said:“The South Africa we have struggled for, in which all our people, be they African, coloured, Indian or white, regard themselves as citizens of one nation is at hand.” Mandela, too, understood the true meaning of the term “African”. He knew that the term “African” referred to black people of this continent; that black South Africans were the Africans. When Thabo Mbeki stood before the National Assembly on the adoption of the Constitution of South Africa and proclaimed himself an African during his seminal speech, he said:“I am formed of the migrants who left Europe to find a new home on our native land. Whatever their own actions, they remain still, part of me. In my veins courses the blood of the Malay slaves who came from the East. Their proud dignity informs my bearing, their culture a part of my essence. The stripes they bore on their bodies from the lash of the slave master are a reminder embossed on my consciousness of what should not be done.” Mbeki recognised and acknowledged that other cultures and the acquired knowledge of the history of various races had shaped his being and person as an African. The speech has been misinterpreted for social expediency by some to mean that all who live on the continent are Africans."
Anonymous

Ashburn, VA

#6388 Apr 23, 2013
“The African is conditioned, by cultural and social institutions of centuries, to a freedom of which Europe has little conception, and it is not in his nature to accept serfdom forever.” These are the words of Jomo Kenyatta, first president of Kenya, from the conclusion to his book Facing Mount Kenya in 1938. Kenyatta, too, does not appear to have suffered from the illusion that the term “African” referred to anybody else other than native inhabitants of Africa — the black people. The rise of Pan-Africanism in the 1920s was a consequence of the need by African intellectuals to challenge white supremacy, to defeat the absurd notion that Africans were inferior to whites and to agitate the African diaspora towards unity with the rest of Africans. The fifth Pan- African Congress that was held in Manchester in 1945 was meant to galvanise Africans against colonial rule and promote self-pride among Africans."
Anonymous

Ashburn, VA

#6389 Apr 23, 2013
"It was in all probability this congress, which was attended by Kenyatta, WEB Du Bois, George Padmore, Kwame Nkrumah, among others, that set the wheels of decolonialisation of Africa and the British West Indies in motion. There was a determination of purpose and single-mindedness of who an African was within the context of Pan- Africanism. Progenitors of colonialisation and their descendants were never seen or imagined as African. They themselves did not imagine themselves as African. Marcus Garvey famously agitated the conscience of the African diaspora when he advocated for the return of Africans to Africa. Garvey was not inviting the mass exodus of Europeans to Africa. Each understood that by African, Garvey was making an impassioned plea to black people to return home to Africa and rebuild it into what it should be for themselves. Ironically, Du Bois was one of those Africans in the diaspora who opposed Garvey’s plan for the return of all Africans to Africa; but in his old-age he relocated to Ghana on the invitation of Nkrumah, were he died."
Anonymous

Ashburn, VA

#6390 Apr 23, 2013
"Marcus Garvey famously agitated the conscience of the African diaspora when he advocated for the return of Africans to Africa. Garvey was not inviting the mass exodus of Europeans to Africa. Each understood that by African, Garvey was making an impassioned plea to black people to return home to Africa and rebuild it into what it should be for themselves.
Marcus Garvey famously agitated the conscience of the African diaspora when he advocated for the return of Africans to Africa. Garvey was not inviting the mass exodus of Europeans to Africa. Each understood that by African, Garvey was making an impassioned plea to black people to return home to Africa and rebuild it into what it should be for themselves.
Marcus Garvey famously agitated the conscience of the African diaspora when he advocated for the return of Africans to Africa. Garvey was not inviting the mass exodus of Europeans to Africa. Each understood that by African, Garvey was making an impassioned plea to black people to return home to Africa and rebuild it into what it should be for themselves."
Anonymous

Ashburn, VA

#6391 Apr 23, 2013
"Our historical revisionists who want to be reclassified as Africans and no longer as Europeans or white, tend to look north at Arab countries and claim, in their state of bewilderment, that Arabs are Africans, therefore, they too have the right to proclaim themselves African. Perhaps it is the lack of historical knowledge that leads some to conclude that Arabs are Africans. The term “Arab” denote the racial identity of people from the Arabian Peninsula who conquered Egypt (then part of the Byzantine Empire) and Libya in the AD 600s and ended up controlling much of the northern part of Africa, including Algeria, Tunisia and Morocco. Therefore, Arabs are not Africans."

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#6392 Apr 23, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
The idiot 'barros' wants us to believe these PPL. DO NOT have ties or are descendants of the original African settlers. There are very beautiful PPL. It's a shame they're face with fighting extinction.
http://images.lightstalkers.org/images/924098...
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-HYMIYUPuxZk/UHM7cTB...
http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5300/5465091809...
The original settlers were Eurasian, as the people remain today.

DNA confirms this. Oh, but you know better, right, Afronazi?

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#6393 Apr 23, 2013
Anonymous wrote:
"Our historical revisionists who want to be reclassified as Africans and no longer as Europeans or white, tend to look north at Arab countries and claim, in their state of bewilderment, that Arabs are Africans, therefore, they too have the right to proclaim themselves African. Perhaps it is the lack of historical knowledge that leads some to conclude that Arabs are Africans. The term “Arab” denote the racial identity of people from the Arabian Peninsula who conquered Egypt (then part of the Byzantine Empire) and Libya in the AD 600s and ended up controlling much of the northern part of Africa, including Algeria, Tunisia and Morocco. Therefore, Arabs are not Africans."
The people of the Maghreb are mostly not Arab, but Berbers. They are the Eurasian-descended indigenous people of the Maghreb, which in human terms is a Eurasian region.

You Afronazis have failed to make a case that any of the Mideast is Africa as you foolishly claim, however, the archaeological, genetic, and historic evidence is clear for a Eurasian Maghreb.

Berbers need to be liberated from Arab and Arabist rule and oppression.

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#6394 Apr 23, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course they're pushing it back. You just can't trust these PPL. Only a insane person would say Europe has older civilizations than Africa. Unless, Africans were already in Europe ( of course we know they've found African skulls in pre-historic Europe).
What the racists want you to believe is Africans ceased being African when they migrated around and populated the world. See, they can't deny we all come from Africa, so they make up some pseudoscience that disconnects Africa with the rest of the world
Herein your vile racism. If Europe had early civilization, it would have to have been created by Africans?

Europeans are incapable of civilization? Then why did they have it before Africa? You can't deal with that, Afronazi racist boy, can you?

African skulls have NOT been found in prehistoric Europe, boy.

Yes, in Arabia, OOA migrants evolved into Eurasians.

It is not pseudoscience, lying Afronazi boy. It is pure science, DNA does not lie... CF and D, M and N---EURASIANS!

LOL at your idiocy, Afronazi racist boy. So they're all still Africans? Denmark is still African? Japan? When did they become Eurasians then, please tell us, Afronazi racist boy.

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#6395 Apr 23, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
1)Australoids, negritos, Melanesians are of African descent 2)if a group stays unmixed, they will change that much, they will remain pretty close to the original OOA ancestors. 3) who the hell said I was Hebrew....you are insane. No wonder ur wife divorced you. She's a Smart woman.
Unmixed? LOL... with WHOM. Your idiotic posts are full of logical inconsistencies. If nobody evolves into Eurasians by leaving Africans, then with whom would they mix in order to change?

You flaming idiot.

In fact, all of the people you mention were Eurasians when in Arabia.

I left her, moron, not that it's your business.

What a pathetic little racist halfwit you are, boy. Trying to make the world black so you won't hate your own Afro-whitey Yank part-heidelbergensis ass. LOL!!!

Australians have mostly Y-types C and K, boy. Eurasian types. Negritos are D or C. Eurasian types.

And you yourself are half white, boy. LOL!!!
´
Get an education, Afronazi racist boy... or come see me, I'll beat that nonsense out of you.

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#6396 Apr 23, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
Blacks once entered Europe & Asia...you big dummy. They could've help it...cuz they were on earth 1st. What part of don't u get.
Get out outta' the AA forum...DIVORCED loser, who i've shown to be here posting on the holidays,(e.g. Thxgvg. & X-mas.)
Wrong again, Afronazi racist boy.

The first humans were as different from modern “black” people as modern whites or east Asians are. The 200,000 yr old Homo sapiens idaltu was very archaic. The people leaving Africa in OOA to evolve into Eurasians in Arabia were still archaic and not like moderns. You of course want only to look at skin color, which is superficial and trivial... like YOU, boy!!!

LOL!!!

Posting on holidays? From where? Was I posting from NM on Christmas, boy? No, I was on the couch at my cousin's house stuffed with Christmas food, slapping Afronazis for amusement as usual.

What a pathetic little turd you are, Afronazi racist boy. You are thoroughly punked & debunked every time you foolishly attempt to confront my superior knowledge, intellect and erudition (look up that word; I'm sure you don't know what it means, Afronazi dropout boy).

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#6397 Apr 23, 2013
Anonymous wrote:
The nazikaner filth get angry and throw tantrums when real Africans set them straight:
"We are not all Africans, black people are!"
"Henry Ford once said,“You can have any colour as long as it is black”. Similarly, native inhabitants of Africa say,“You can be an African in any colour as long as he is black.” There has been a sudden demand for an African to come in a variety of colours. During days of slavery when an African was a commodity traded over the counter, there was never a demand for him in any colour but black. There is now an attempt in the 21st century to redefine the colour scheme of an African. Whites want to be classified as African. Whites have been relentless in their attempts at historical revisionism in respect of the definition of “African” since the 1994 democratic dispensation, and their efforts appeared to have intensified after the collective hoorah of reconciliation had dissipated. Historical revisionism is generally a legitimate re-evaluation of existing understanding and knowledge of particular historical aspects in order to correct any distortions; but there are also those with deliberate motives to revise history in order to mislead or reflect them in favourable light. Historically, the term “African” never had any ambiguous meaning. To Africans today it still does not have any ambiguous meaning. Africans across the continent and in the diaspora have long understood its meaning to refer to them as black people. African leaders from all walks of life who waged a relentless struggle against the thuggery of colonialism in the continent, were of one mind with regard to who Africans were. The fight against colonialism was to liberate Africans from the thuggery visited upon them by Europeans who had arrogated to themselves the power to rule with brute force and dominate vast territories of the African continent." http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/sentletsediaka...
You Afronazis are the ones redefining the color of Africans, boy.

According to you everyone on earth is really African, from Olmecs to Celts.

In fact, you have nothing to say about any of this because you're nothing but a racist whose views on anything are irrelevant.,

So shut your mouth, boy.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Proof every white citizen today owned slaves an... 3 min The Logical Axe 4
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 5 min JRB 1,600,684
A poem for Coretta.... 7 min Yisraelite Suprem... 6
Breaking: Gina Torres joins #swirlnation 14 min Yisraelite Suprem... 17
Do African Americans listen to the 'Beatles'? (Apr '08) 15 min Redefined 381
Poll What man is great for a Sagittarian woman (Jul '08) 23 min Summer Jones 41
News Fear proliferates among African-Americans in Ri... (Nov '16) 33 min Paul Kersey 6
Marcus: thinking of leaving Topix 1 hr Tampa 34
Why don't prostitutes sleep with black men? (Jul '16) 2 hr Legion_is_Maceo 143
More from around the web