Do Egyptian Consider Themselves To Be...

Level 7

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#68 Oct 15, 2013
They keep deleting my posts of the real pharaos to counter Afle.

There were NO whites in Egypt. Egypt was NOT "mixed" with any sort of white blood.

All the dynasties were BLACK!

From the beginning to invasions of the Romans/Greeks.

Specfically, the 4th, 5th and 25th Dynasties were BLACK.. Through and through.

All that fake mess Alf is posting is ridiculous.

Alf, you need to check out Forgery; 100 years of deception.

It hits on your fake busts.

At first when they put it out, the bust had NO nose and was cut off on BOTH the right side and left side angles. Which still was of a BLACK person. Now you have the remake of that one, showing a nose? A pointed one at that? Agenda driven much?

I posted the pharaos, but they deleted them.

Level 7

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#69 Oct 15, 2013
“They (Egyptians), had been conquered successively by the Arabs of Ethiopia, by the Persians, and by the Greeks, and their physiological character, as well as their language, seems to have been altered by the admixture.”

Then the Turks / Europeans
trollslayer

Midlothian, IL

#70 Oct 15, 2013
unfazed wrote:
Nice work' unfazed' Great pics
trollslayer

Midlothian, IL

#71 Oct 15, 2013
unfazed wrote:
The Fifth Dynasty was ALSO Completely black:
Stop with those fake racist websites trying to insert whites in the mix and push blacks as being slaves and nubian employed mercenaries to the whites.
Whites were simply not there.
You all were still "plunged in darkness" !
5th Dynasty
http://wysinger.homestead.com/kingsahure.html
king sahure
http://payload.cargocollective.com/1/0/8997/8...
http://www.ancient-egypt.co.uk/metropolitan/i...
To add, that fake Ramses 2.. you should be ashamed of yourself TODAY for trying to pass that one off.
The real one
http://www.hwh22.it/fotoimages/18_archeo/Muse...
Those statues are "cold" stark TRUTH
Amazing REAL PROOF of WHO the Kemets were. Keep up the GREAT WORK.

“No Substitute For The Truth”

Level 8

Since: Jan 10

United States

#75 Oct 17, 2013
No Greek or Roman Pharaoh BEFORE Cleopatra & Ramses Y-Chromosomes is Sub Saharan Africa NOT Middle Eastern.

Case Closed!
trollslayer

Midlothian, IL

#76 Oct 18, 2013
Redefined wrote:
No Greek or Roman Pharaoh BEFORE Cleopatra & Ramses Y-Chromosomes is Africa NOT Middle Eastern.
Case Closed!
fixed....you can just say "Africa"

.....any mention of "sub" anything about Africa is playing into the euro trick that there are some how "2 different Africa's" 1 "black" & one falsely harboring so-called quote indigenous euroasians UN-qoute.

The racists HATE it when I point this out this TRUTH....watch them start freakin' out

“No Substitute For The Truth”

Level 8

Since: Jan 10

United States

#77 Oct 18, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
fixed....you can just say "Africa"
.....any mention of "sub" anything about Africa is playing into the euro trick that there are some how "2 different Africa's" 1 "black" & one falsely harboring so-called quote indigenous euroasians UN-qoute.
The racists HATE it when I point this out this TRUTH....watch them start freakin' out
Understood!

Ish Tov
Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#78 Oct 18, 2013
Voodoo Re wrote:
<quoted text> There were no white beyond the 6,000 year time frame. Non-hue-man inhabitants came much later. Scientifically speaking that is through a simple study of Melanin. Also, while I'm looking for a therapist make sure you find eyes and a brain PARASITE.
Wrong, racist and worthless subhuman misfit.

The term hue-man is racist. Don't use it in my presence.

There are various hues, including those of Europeans. All humans have melanin except full albinos.

Pale skin evolved long before 6000 years ago, in western as eastern Eurasia.

The Guanches had been isolated 6000 years on the Canaries and were blonde. Obviously “white” characteristics are far older than 6000 years.

Afronazi liar.

Ish Tov
Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#79 Oct 18, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
fixed....you can just say "Africa"
.....any mention of "sub" anything about Africa is playing into the euro trick that there are some how "2 different Africa's" 1 "black" & one falsely harboring so-called quote indigenous euroasians UN-qoute.
The racists HATE it when I point this out this TRUTH....watch them start freakin' out
Well, as you know, lying Afronazi schmuck, there is no singular people who inhabited Africa as its indigenous people.

For one thing, the Maghreb has been predominantly Eurasian for 30,000 years, as you well know, since you saw the evidence you pretended not to see.

Afronazi liar.
trollslayer

Midlothian, IL

#80 Oct 18, 2013
" there is no singular people who inhabited Africa as its indigenous people."

-Ish Tov aka 'barros' aka 'sinju' aka 'barry'?

-----

My non-troll friends HEREIN LIES THE LIE. This bastard wants to place "euroasians" in Africa.

YES there was ORIGINALLY A NON-'euroasian" singular people who inhabited Africa". This means
NO WHITE, NON-ORIGINAL AFRICAN PPL. ARE INDIGENOUS TO AFRICA.

This means NO WHITE, NON-ORIGINAL AFRICAN PPL. ARE INDIGENOUS TO AFRICA.

This means NO WHITE, NON-ORIGINAL AFRICAN PPL. ARE INDIGENOUS TO AFRICA.

____
to believe otherwise is to ALLOW THE Theft of AFRICAN HISTORY.
trollslayer

Midlothian, IL

#81 Oct 18, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>

fixed....you can just say "Africa"
":.....any mention of "sub" anything about Africa is playing into the euro trick that there are some how "2 different Africa's" 1 "black" & one falsely harboring so-called quote indigenous euroasians UN-qoute.
The racists HATE it when I point this out this TRUTH....watch them start freakin' out."

NOTE HOW THE TROLL USES "SUB"-HUMAN TO MEAN LESS THAN HUMAN. The SAME goes..... for when "sub" is used to describe any part of Africa!!
Remember "sub" means 'less than'.
trollslayer

Midlothian, IL

#82 Oct 18, 2013
correction: NOTE HOW THE TROLLS USE "SUB"-HUMAN TO MEAN LESS THAN HUMAN

Level 7

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#83 Oct 18, 2013
Canary Island INDIGENOUS people - AFRICAN

Researches Into the Early History of Mankind

If we go westward as far as the Canary Island, WE FIND A RACE, CONSIDERED TO BE OF AFRICAN ORIGIN, living in the fourteenth century under purely stone age conditions, making hatchets, knives, lancets, and spear-heads of obsidian, and axes of green jasper, and pointing their spears and digging-sticks with horns

It is possible that they might have once had the use of iron, and have lost it on removing to the islands, where there is no ore, but no evidence of this having been the case seems to have been found.

Level 7

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#84 Oct 18, 2013
Cont:

What is known of the NATIVE CIVILIZATION of the Canary Islands, the making of pottery, the cooking in underground ovens, the use of the fire-drill, leaves no doubt that the Guanches knew how to produce and use fire at the time of the European expeditions in the 14th and 15th centuries.

Yet Antonio Galvano, writing his treatise about the middle of the sixteenth century, declares that "in times past they ate raw meat, for want of fire."
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#85 Oct 18, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
Those statues are "cold" stark TRUTH
Amazing REAL PROOF of WHO the Kemets were. Keep up the GREAT WORK.
Ancient Egypt was most definitly multi-racial There are plenty of white people painted on the walls of ancient Egypy as well as blure eyed Egyptians!!!!!Ancient Egyptians were E1b1b carriers NOT E1b1a so obviously they were INDIGENOUS North Africans NOT Sub-Saharans!
www.asorblog.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/n...
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#86 Oct 18, 2013
unfazed wrote:
Canary Island INDIGENOUS people - AFRICAN
Researches Into the Early History of Mankind
If we go westward as far as the Canary Island, WE FIND A RACE, CONSIDERED TO BE OF AFRICAN ORIGIN, living in the fourteenth century under purely stone age conditions, making hatchets, knives, lancets, and spear-heads of obsidian, and axes of green jasper, and pointing their spears and digging-sticks with horns
It is possible that they might have once had the use of iron, and have lost it on removing to the islands, where there is no ore, but no evidence of this having been the case seems to have been found.
THEY WERE BERBERS looking just like these Moroccan BERBERS:
www.alarabiya.net/articles/2012/02/05/192810....
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#87 Oct 18, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
fixed....you can just say "Africa"
.....any mention of "sub" anything about Africa is playing into the euro trick that there are some how "2 different Africa's" 1 "black" & one falsely harboring so-called quote indigenous euroasians UN-qoute.
The racists HATE it when I point this out this TRUTH....watch them start freakin' out
Sub-Saharan is used ALL THE TIME IN SOUTH AFRICA! No Africans think it is racist except dumb Afronazis like you! North Africans ARE NOT SEEN as Sub-Saharan in Africa by other Africans!
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#88 Oct 18, 2013
Voodoo Re wrote:
<quoted text> There were no white beyond the 6,000 year time frame. Non-hue-man inhabitants came much later. Scientifically speaking that is through a simple study of Melanin. Also, while I'm looking for a therapist make sure you find eyes and a brain PARASITE.
You nothing but a typical low IQ DUMB AFRONAZI FREAK! Whites have been around for 43000 years. Cro-Magnon skeletons have been found all over Europe and the Middle East you dumb racists freak!
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#89 Oct 18, 2013
unfazed wrote:
“They (Egyptians), had been conquered successively by the Arabs of Ethiopia, by the Persians, and by the Greeks, and their physiological character, as well as their language, seems to have been altered by the admixture.”
Then the Turks / Europeans
Egypt was between two light sskin people,Libyans and Middle Eastern people! There is just no way they were a black people only!
Photo of Canaanites:
www.dqhall.com/Abraham_in_Egypt/

Level 7

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#90 Oct 18, 2013
Contin:

These Guanches were the aborigines of the Island. Large numbers perished from the arms of the Spaniards and by a famine (the familiar of war) which afterwards came upon the island.

The rest gradually perished away, under that MYSTERIOUS AGENCY which the MERE PRESENCE OF WHITE MEN APPEARS TO EMPLOY AGAINST A WEAKER RACE.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
How come African-Americans tend to live in urba... 2 min Welcome to Tijuana 6
At last - hope for Bill and Hill's marriage! 4 min MeSo 2
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 5 min RoxLo 1,421,376
News Pro-Clinton super PAC to invest in ground opera... 7 min WasteWater 47
Trump will carry atleast 25% of the BLACK VOTE 12 min Oh No You Di-nt 335
News legaciesThe Hidden Black Women Who Helped Win t... 14 min Oh No You Di-nt 1
Clinton unfavorable rating skyrockets 16 min Oh No You Di-nt 6
Why aren't there any Negroes in the Bible? 16 min Jerry Falwell Fan... 638
49er QB Colin Kaepernick is WAKING UP 59 min Would you 142
the moors were black africans not arabs!!! (Jun '08) 5 hr Sammy 47,966
153 Years and Still Nothing??? 6 hr SeerResources 95
More from around the web