Well, you haven't be around very long. You wouldn't remember my ongoing duels with "RealBrother," and numerous others who took my opposition to them as evidence that "Savant is a self-hating Negro woh wants to be white." MOST of my energies are directed against white racists because most attacks on me and fellow Blacks come from them. As for Harrisson, he is quite consistently antiracist. His attitude toward white males depends on the attidues of those white males. He is contemptuous of white racists, male or female. So am I. And I've known Harrisson much longer than you have.<quoted text>
I've never seen you take issue with anti-white racists -- you have a habit of capitalizing "Black" and always lower-casing "white".
I've seen Harrison take issue with blacks who say that white people are evil and should be destroyed, etc, etc. He says they shouldn't think that way because not all white people are evil, for example the ones who voted for Obama.
But when an anti-white enters a thread and starts talking shit about white males, it's a different story. There was one of them who said stuff like: 90% of white males are pedos, 50% of white males have psychological issues, etc. I asked this particular person if he studied under Francis Cress Welsing. Do you know know who that is? I'll be glad to repost the quotes I posted from her works. Anyway, he said her work was brilliant. I remember seeing Barros chewing this person out earlier in another thread.
What was Harrison's response to this person? He thanked him for his insightful posts and said he was glad he was in the thread.
So, if Harrison is OK with "racism" against white males but not all whites, how does one explain that?
A: White Wimminz
Yes, Harrison likes his white women pleasantly plump and his "white boi's" boot-licking ass-kissers of black men, e.g. attai1.
As for Frances Cress Welsing, I do know who she is. I've even met her.(You're beginning to sound like Rand Paul who thought he could lecture Black people at Howard University about Black history.) Welsing is quite famous, but speak from a different philosophical perspective than I or (as best I can tell) Harrisson. At any rate, my critiques of race and racial essentialism even in AA Forum since 2007 should make the difference between her perspective and mind obvious to all but thee obtuse.
At any rate, I don't believe she has posted in AA Forum, and see no reason to reply to her theories here.
Unfortunately, as I have seen you misinterpret the views of others qjite often, often relying on rationally unwarranted assumptions, I'd have to see the actual words and context of words by Harrisson even to be sure what you're getting at. But I've had enough contact with Harrisson both in Topix and in real time to have a pretty good idea of whate he stands. And it's against racism.
But neither of us, as members of the subjected group, is moreally obligated to spend more time (ore ven as much time) opposing the bigots in our group than the bigots in the dominant white group. Still we both see racism is immoral.