NEANDERTHALS made WHITES more INTELLI...

Ish Tov
Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#871 Jan 30, 2014
lmao wrote:
<quoted text>
Another tough guy internet clown. You equate shiny rims to black people, you use the word boy when talking to black people, and then you have the nerve to get in your feelings like some little beeyoch when you get joked? You aren't man enough to eff with me Pedro!
Think not, boy? I know you're a boy because you're a racist, therefore scum.

Yes, in person I'd silence your idiotic spew, boy, and you would not enjoy the process.

But, of course, like all racists you're a coward.

Boy.
lmao

Arlington, VA

#872 Jan 30, 2014
Ish Tov wrote:
<quoted text>
Think not, boy? I know you're a boy because you're a racist, therefore scum.
Yes, in person I'd silence your idiotic spew, boy, and you would not enjoy the process.
But, of course, like all racists you're a coward.
Boy.
2 Mexicans have tried before you, so there are two Mexicans that when they see me coming they cross the street to the other side because they will get that @$$ whipped! I don't think you would be much different! You're too sensitive dude. I bet you pull hair and scratch just like a lil beeyoch!
Beer Belly Bobs Ghost

Elmhurst, NY

#873 Jan 30, 2014
Ish Tov wrote:
<quoted text>
You are incredibly stupid.
The study said precisely that Chinese WERE Eurasians, as they descend from OOA migrants! LOL!!! THAT's where they descend from Africans, like all Eurasians, via OOA!
LOL at your stupidity. You have no f'ing clue about any of this.
Look up the common Chinese haplotypes. C, O, etc. All Eurasian.
What the study said, you dimwit, is that Chinese are descended from OO-Africa migrants, NOT from eastern Eurasian Homo erectus. Get it, moron?
This supports Out-of-Africa, and refutes multiregionalism, in which many Chinese anthropologists believed.
All Homo sapiens, including Chinese, descend from early sapiens 200k bp who evolved in northeast Africa.
Get it? I mean damn.
Naa, anything you say is suspect. You're no authority on the topic. I'll refer to those in the know.

But thanks for trying to be relevant to us here.

:)

Ish Tov
Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#874 Jan 31, 2014
lmao wrote:
<quoted text>
2 Mexicans have tried before you, so there are two Mexicans that when they see me coming they cross the street to the other side because they will get that @$$ whipped! I don't think you would be much different! You're too sensitive dude. I bet you pull hair and scratch just like a lil beeyoch!
You're a big-talking punkbutt, boy.

And you ARE a boy... boy.

You would regret for life any encounter with me, boy.

Racists like you... I just seem to go nuts, I can't be stopped, I want to break every one of their bones, I just can't seem to control it...

Now shut the F up, boy.

Ish Tov
Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#875 Jan 31, 2014
Beer Belly Bobs Ghost wrote:
<quoted text>Naa, anything you say is suspect. You're no authority on the topic. I'll refer to those in the know.
But thanks for trying to be relevant to us here.
:)
You can't refer to anything if you can't understand what you read, boy.

And you cannot understand what you read, lol, that is obvious.

The study showed 100% Eurasian DNA in the Chinese. All OOA descendants. That means Eurasian.

Once again, you Afronazis jump into things you are incapable of understanding, due to your low intelligence and lack of education.

Boy.
Beer Belly Bobs Ghost

Elmhurst, NY

#876 Jan 31, 2014
Ish Tov wrote:
<quoted text>
You can't refer to anything if you can't understand what you read, boy.
And you cannot understand what you read, lol, that is obvious.
The study showed 100% Eurasian DNA in the Chinese. All OOA descendants. That means Eurasian.
Once again, you Afronazis jump into things you are incapable of understanding, due to your low intelligence and lack of education.
Boy.
Naaa you're wrong again. But what I fully understand is that you're a white troll on the AAF with nearly 5000 posts in as many months and having still left no impression on anybody.

That much I understand.

:)
Darwiny

Fremont, NC

#877 Jan 31, 2014
D Davis MD wrote:
"There is evidence that Neanderthals deliberately buried their dead and occasionally even marked their graves with offerings, such as flowers. No other primates, and no earlier human species, had ever practiced this sophisticated and symbolic behavior."
All modern humans learned the trait of burying their dead from the intelligent Neanderthal man.
Neanderthals killed and ate each others azz holes like popcorn!
Blaine

Colorado Springs, CO

#880 Jan 31, 2014
Darwiny wrote:
<quoted text>Neanderthals killed and ate each others azz holes like popcorn!
You must be thinking of your mama.
Beer Belly Bobs Ghost

Elmhurst, NY

#881 Jan 31, 2014
See, Ish troll uses science like a drunken man uses lamp-posts - for support rather than illumination.

Since: Feb 14

Location hidden

#882 Feb 6, 2014
Whites found to contain Neanderthal genes.... Suddenly the Neanderthal ( we know to have been analogue to a caveman) is imbued with intelligence and the font of genetic superiority.

When will whites stop trying to play with history and shaping facts? They are the most dishonest race on this planet.

Neanderthals were simple, adapted for cold climate and not much else. Their lack or art and simple responses to homo sapien presence, shows how basic they were. They were literally built for a harsh environment, lacked proper speech, ate raw meat and lacked creativity. They were likely aggressive (they're brute strength had a purpose) given that they lacked sophisticated tools, its logical they were upfront and personal in their hunting of wild animals more ferocious than those today.)

Whats interesting is how white people are able to deceive themselves. Do they think anyone else is deceived? They're rewriting of history; eurocentrism, has been long exposed and has no effect today.

We know how even a small percentage of genes can have a massive effect upon the outcome. This combination can be seen throughout European history; uncleanliness, fetid white living in squalor for centuries while the rest of the civilised world bathed, a sophisticated trade between peoples over thousands of years, whilst euros fought endlessly amongst themselves, even the proof that Neanderthal copied their tools from homo sapiens they came into contact with is repeated by the white people in their contact with African peoples, its like they never had an original idea.

No plastered over the internet are signs of white's insecurity; Neanderthal is intelligent we are told. Neandathal had a larger brain = intelligence, we are told. Neandathal + homosapien = superior, we are told. None of this makes any logical sense to anyone except to white people, because the need to believe it, to do otherwise would crash their whole synthetic concept of themselves.

To accept traditionally understood Neanderthal would mean that Neanderthal + homo sapiens = Halfbred mongrol with deficient traits, it would imply there was something lacking in white people, that makes them less, not more human, that what everyone can see by browsing through a history book of sanctioned white atrocity after atrocity since their creation, just confirms the deficit; aggression and savagery - they same things projected by them to others. Sigmund Fried has already covered the reasons for this...

After thousands upon thousands of years of civilisation in Africa, a mere few hundred years of white dominated culture will end most likely before a thousand years is up. The period relegated to dusty history books of the future, put rightly in perspectives by the brown and black peoples that will rule. It will be forgotten like the Mongols, Romans, the Chinese Empire, Spanish, British etc - just another period in the sun, whilst the real rulers will take their rightful and historic place at the top.

Just as the original Neanderthals were bred out by true man, the half bred Neanderthals will have to be bred out again and obliterated from this world forever. Their subhuman aggression-ridden genes cast aside, for there is no place for the white man in the future, when we are visiting star systems, meeting alien beings, colonising other worlds, these new vistas will be exclusively for Black and Brown peoples, there will be no desire to re conjure up the white race then.

No-one of the future will demand that white people should be a protected species, everyone in the world of colour has beef with them and will gladly see them die out and remain so.

Neanderthal genes are bad genes and whilst they don't excuse the appallingly behaviour over the centuries of the white people, they explain somewhat their inherent aggression, basic nature and untrustworthiness. At least we can justify their eradication and the relegate them to the history books.

Since: Feb 14

Location hidden

#884 Feb 6, 2014
Curious Me wrote:
<quoted text>
There is absolutely ZERO legitimate up-to-date respectable scientific anthropological/physiological/ archaeological/or-anything-log ical that will cogently support your wild and asinine assertion,ÁSS HÓLE.
Bullsheet. There is no evidence to suggest that Neanderthals spoke. After scientists discovered that white man was related to a caveman more closely than anyone else, there was a scramble to try an prove that somehow the Neanderthal was not as primitive as we all know them to be. This is typical of the white race - to manipulate data to prove a desirable outcome.

What scientists are doing are looking for reasons to prove an outcome. They are inferring ideal conclusions from inconclusive data and are stating 'it is likely that...''This leads us to infer that...'- this is not proof of anything, but estimations, guesses - based on what would appear to be information that suggests Neandathals could talk and hear speech.

The capability of speech and the potential for speech are too very different things. The potential of every human on earth is almost identical, but the outcome is invariably different. Evolution more so; we have many traits genetically and physically in our bodies which we have no need for ( http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vestigial_or... ) and parts which are in the process of evolving - an Alien antropologist might infer superhuman attributes based upon our bodies very easily.

But behind the'discoveries' here, is the clear intention to assert that Neandathals were more intelligent than we previously assumed. Before, this assumption didn't affect the white race, now that it does, all hell breaks loose and now we need to recreate the story and 'make it right/white'.

We you have information CONFIRMING that Neanderthals spoke a language comparable to human language, THEN you have scientific evidence. Until then, you have scientific opinion which has not reached anything close to a consensus which is the general principle of scientific practice.

Neanderthals were simple, lived basic lives, were adapted to the cold, ate raw meat and lacked creativity in comparison with homo sapiens. THIS is scientifically proven, not opnion, whereas you present opinion only.

Since: Feb 14

Location hidden

#886 Feb 6, 2014
Pere du Champ wrote:
<quoted text>
You confuse scientists with the white racist nudniks cruising Topix.
In fact it has been revealed, before the knowledge that Eurasians were part neandertalensis, that they were intelligent, had religion, made musical instruments, and possibly were developing an Upper Palaeolithic culture even before contact with sapiens.
Where is your evidence? Prove it. Religion? Intelligent? So are dolphins and dogs, what do you mean by intelligent? Do you think that a what has been described as a burial ritual is a sign of religion? Are you retarded? The Shanidar IV 'Flower Burial': a Re-evaluation of Neanderthal Burial Ritual". Cambridge Archaeological Journal 9 (1): 127–129 Read that fool.
here; "recent work into the flower burial has suggested that perhaps the pollen was introduced to the burial by animal action, as several burrows of a gerbil-like rodent known as the Persian jird were found nearby. The jird is known to store large numbers of seeds and flowers at certain points in their burrows and this argument was used in conjunction with the lack of ritual treatment of the rest of the skeletons in the cave to suggest that the Shanidar IV burial had natural, not cultural, origins".
You then go on to speculate about neandertalensis, using the same stereotypes which were created in the 19th century, not based on reality.
They did not lack creativity. They cooked their meat. They created art. Adapted to cold and nothing else? No, they were adapted to big-game hunting. They didn't live on the ice, you idiot, they were in forested and steppe areas, mostly.
You are a white fool. They were ADAPTED! Do you even understand what that means? They had adapted for a cold environment. Every school child knows this.

"European Neandertals employed a complex set of physiological cold defenses, homologous to those seen in contemporary humans and nonhuman primates. While Neandertal morphological patterns, such as foreshortened extremities and low relative surface-area, may have explained some of the variance in cold resistance, it is suggested the adaptive package was strongly dependent on a rich array of physiological defenses. A summary of the environmental cold conditions in which the Neandertals lived is presented, and a comparative ethnographic model from Tierra del Fuego is used. Muscle and subcutaneous fat are excellent "passive" insulators. Neandertals were quite muscular, but it is unlikely that they could maintain enough superficial body fat to offer much cold protection. A major, high-energy metabolic adaptation facilitated by modest amounts of highly thermogenic brown adipose tissue (BAT) is proposed. In addition, Neandertals would have been protected by general mammalian cold defenses based on systemic vasoconstriction and intensified by acclimatization, aerobic fitness, and localized cold--induced vasodilation. However, these defenses are energetically expensive. Based on contemporary data from circumpolar peoples, it is estimated that Neandertals required 3,360 to 4,480 kcal per day to support strenuous winter foraging and cold resistance costs. Several specific genetic cold adaptations are also proposed--heat shock protein (actually, stress shock protein), an ACP*1 locus somatic growth factor, and a specialized calcium metabolism not as yet understood."

Since: Feb 14

Location hidden

#887 Feb 6, 2014
[Quote}YOU are deceived by your own prejudice, boy, that is obvious. You're a racist against both neandertalensis and whites. Europe had no civilization, boy? The oldest known civilization on earth was in SE Europe.[/quote]

Wrong again, fool. First you need to understand the concept of 'civilisation', then learn from there.

"The concept 'cradle of civilization' is the subject of much debate. The figurative use of cradle to mean "the place or region in which anything is nurtured or sheltered in its earlier stage" is traced by the OED to Spenser (1590). Charles Rollin's Ancient History (1734) has "Egypt that served at first as the cradle of the holy nation."

[Quote]The Romans built baths in every town. Europeans had maritime trade by 6000 years ago, in the Atlantic.[/quote]

"Members of the upper classes, on the other hand, rather than completely forgo bathing, tended to cut down their full body bathing habits down to around a few times per year, striking a balance between risk of acquiring a disease from the bath vs. body stench."

"As one Russian ambassador to France noted “His Majesty [Louis XIV] stunk like a wild animal.”

You whites learned and then unlearned how to bathe. I can smell you stink over the internet now.

[Quote]In fact neandertalensis did have a larger brain than sapiens.
No one is disputing this dumbass. Whales have even larger brains. Do you understand where I'm going? Brain size does not and has never been linked to intelligence. Only a completel moron would believe this. Again, revisionist prattle from easymode interent man.

[Quote]You also forget, boy, that all Eurasians are mixed with neandertalensis, including many people probably darker than you.
Boy.
The concept of racism was created by white people, so I find it ironic that you attempt to throw back at me a hang up on skin colour, when this didn't concern anyone in Africa for thousands of years.

The bottom line is you are becoming instinct by your own measurements ironically, coming to bite you in your ass. If you easy mode snow people weren't so hung up on color, this couldn't arose you so much with your 'boy' mantra, when we both know that nobody has ever referred to you as a man!

Since: Feb 14

Location hidden

#888 Feb 6, 2014
Pere du Champ wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong, uneducated boy.
There is strong evidence that neandertalensis had language, since the neandertalensis hyoid bone was nearly identical to that of sapiens. They spoke, probably better than y ou can.
You're typical of Afronazis... desperately concocting anti-white racist tales in order to boost your failing self-esteem.
This is embarrasing. You can't even sustain your own propaganda. Here:
"The size of the hypoglossal canal has been linked with the evolution of language and used to date the origin of human speech to at least 400,000 years ago by Kay et al.(1). This linkage is based on the fact that the hypoglossal canal of the occipital bone contains cranial nerve XII, which supplies the motor innervation to the intrinsic muscles of the tongue and all but one of the extrinsic muscles (2). Because the hypoglossal canals of two Neandertal specimens are within the modern human size range, it has been suggested that Neandertals had vocal capabilities equivalent to those of modern humans (1). Despite quick popular acceptance (3), the hypothesized link between hypoglossal canal size and speech remains untested. Instead, it has been assumed that the size of the hypoglossal nerve is related to speech, and that the size of the hypoglossal canal is correlated with the size of the hypoglossal nerve (1). The finding that modern humans (n = 48) have larger hypoglossal canals than most chimpanzees and gorillas (1) does not test these hypotheses."
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1...
You might want to discover the difference between an opinion and a fact. The above is an argument that a conclusion can';t be made about speech given that other hominids had the same bone.
You are accusing scientists of teleology, but you are wrong, of course. The conclusions about neandertalensis are based on real evidence. LOL at your idiotic rationalization... oh right, they'd evolved the capacity to speech without speaking... LOL!!!
The EVIDENCE shows us that neandertalensis was more intelligent than previously believed. They made art, they buried their dead, they created musical instruments, they had language, and in fact there is some evidence now that the Châtelperronian culture developed without sapiens influence. Of course you know nothing of any of this, uneducated boy.
YOUR spew is opinion, boy. The facts are as I've stated them. You speak out of prejudice, stupidly thinking you're insulting whites thereby, but you forget, boy, that all Eurasians have neandertalensis admixture, just as you have heidelbergensis admixture.
You are just repeating what has already proven to be false. Learn some of your white science again and question why you are so quick to reach conclusions which are not universally accepted. I think its that deficient caveman gene in you, that is working against the more intelligent homo sapien aspect given to you by Africans. Looks like I'm talking to the caveman part..
Beer Belly Bobs Ghost

Elmhurst, NY

#891 Feb 6, 2014
Looks like I humiliated the Ish troll sock so much it came back as another troll. Pure du crap is not fooling me.
fo shizzal mo nizzal

Tampa, FL

#892 Feb 6, 2014
???

Who cares?

You are what you are, if I were 100% Neanderthal I wouldn't care a shit, I am STILL a member of the greatest race to EVER walk the Earth...

All these dumb descendants of Homo Heidelbergensis are doing {the sub-Saharan African stock}, is saying that Neanderthals are better than sapiens, Neanderthal walked on the Moon LMWAO
Beer Belly Bobs Ghost

Elmhurst, NY

#893 Feb 6, 2014
fo shizzal mo nizzal wrote:
???
Who cares?
You are what you are, if I were 100% Neanderthal I wouldn't care a shit, I am STILL a member of the greatest race to EVER walk the Earth...
All these dumb descendants of Homo Heidelbergensis are doing {the sub-Saharan African stock}, is saying that Neanderthals are better than sapiens, Neanderthal walked on the Moon LMWAO
Umm...it was a white that started this thread claiming Neanderthal is what makes them "intelligent"

Try and understand the topic you are on before making comments.
fo shizzal mo nizzal

Tampa, FL

#894 Feb 6, 2014
Beer Belly Bobs Ghost wrote:
Looks like I humiliated the Ish troll sock so much it came back as another troll. Pure du crap is not fooling me.
You are being disingenuous, you know darn well that:

1) Ish Tov is banned
2) That barros constantly whips your butt over this subject

You don't like the truth?

Well, it is still the truth.

YOU are a direct descendant of Homo Heidelbergensis, a creature more ape than man.

All of the world's, not just White people, have Neanderthal DNA, and should be proud of it and their accomplishments..
Beer Belly Bobs Ghost

Elmhurst, NY

#895 Feb 6, 2014
fo shizzal mo nizzal wrote:
<quoted text>
You are being disingenuous, you know darn well that:
1) Ish Tov is banned
2) That barros constantly whips your butt over this subject
You don't like the truth?
Well, it is still the truth.
YOU are a direct descendant of Homo Heidelbergensis, a creature more ape than man.
All of the world's, not just White people, have Neanderthal DNA, and should be proud of it and their accomplishments..
Trolls support trolls I get it.

That being said...they're still just trolls trying to be relevant here.

I toy with you types...I toy with you.

:)
fo shizzal mo nizzal

Tampa, FL

#896 Feb 6, 2014
Pere du Champ wrote:
<quoted text>
Is there any OTHER explanation for the hypoglossal canal and hyoid bone, than that neandertalensis had speech? You fool.
If we look at the “language”, or the meaningful vocalizations of chimps, and compare them to human language, and then note how close are neandertalensis in their morphology, especially that related to speech, we find that they are nearly identical to Homo sapiens and just as distant from the chimps. That is one indication of language.
Nothing I stated has proven to be false, boy. You raised doubts as to neandertalensis language... but proved nothing, boy. Obviously you do not know how science functions.
I'd like to see an explanation as to why neandertalensis would evolve all these characteristics of speech without developing speech?
Science isn't “white”, boy. You use that as an excuse to dismiss scientific findings which don't agree with your racist misinterpretations.
What effects has the heidelbergensis DNA in you had, boy? Do you look like this, the guy your great-great-granny was boinking?
http://shadowness.com/file/item3/58292/image_...
You're a racist, boy, nothing more. Your words are babble, your soul is rotten.
LOL

I think the Afrocentrics have enjoyed using the Neanderthal card for so long that they have lost all objectivity.

Fact is, around 6 billion of the Earth's inhabitants have Neanderthal DNA, sub-Saharan Africans and their Heidelbergensis DNA are the minority on this planet.

Also, it hurts the Afrocentrics that as we have move along we have learned that Neanderthal were not the cave-living, women dragging 'ugs' of lore, they were intelligent and adaptable people, who, as a species, survived longer than Sapiens have been on the planet.

When I read of what they achieved, with or without speech, I'm pretty in awe, and honored to have their DNA.

As for communication skills, it seems to have been missed by the Afrocentrics that we are communicating here on topix without oral skills? lol

I keep thinking of that gorilla, Koko, who has an IQ of 95 and can communicate, without the need of complex oral language and abstract concepts.

TBH, I think oral skills, as important a they may be considered to be, aren't as important as being quick visual learners...I know some very very bright folks who can read hundreds of pages a day, yet put a physical task in front of them, and they won't get it in a week!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
drilling for the nerve has died of aids in his ... (Nov '15) 20 min Dan Snow 9
Why are BW so angry? 30 min U Make Me Laugh 18
News News 2 hour ago 8:48 a.m.Yes, slaves built the ... 34 min U Make Me Laugh 39
Woman PUPPET President or BILL CLINTON? 41 min undercoverboss2016 1
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 45 min Grey Ghost 1,406,204
are white people human or subhuman (Nov '10) 50 min Zulu 78
Do little white men have a secret desire to be ... 1 hr u Make Me Laugh 2
Trump BUSTED .....PUTIN 3 hr RMG El Rey de Tra... 26
BM Thwarts White Rapist & Robber. 4 hr dindu tribal leader 39
Poll Will Donald Trump be the next President of the ... (Aug '15) 8 hr PATRIOT DVC MOLON... 1,585
More from around the web