NEANDERTHALS made WHITES more INTELLI...

“DANGER!!”

Level 8

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#584 Nov 22, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
I want linked data to prove the erroneous title of this thread
"NEANDERTHALS made WHITES more INTELLIGENT"....you SUPPORTER OF racism against Ethiopian JEWS AND OTHER Africans.
All I have noticed is that "Barros" doesn't necessarily believe that H.Neanderthal DNA actually made Eurasians more intelligent.

I don't believe that West-Central sub-Saharan Africans are necessarily less intelligent than Eurasians.

I DO, however, believe that YOU ARE AN IGNORANT SLIM-WITTED DOPE, but then I don't really have to try to prove that because it is a self evident foregone conclusion, JÁÇKØFF.

I also DO believe that H.Heidelbergensis was, in fact, less intelligent than H.Sapiens OR H.Neanderthals, and I also suspect that YOU musta slipped through the cracks, somehow, and that YOU are actually MUCH more part H.Heidelbergensis than any intelligent West-Central sub-Saharan African.

I have yet to see where "Barros" has denigrated ANY Jews and that is inclusive of any Ethiopian Jews, the existence of which we both are cognizant.

I also much rather applaud "LION'S" decision to not be so concerned about trying to prove the worth of any SSA's through empty rhetoric but to show that they are every bit as capable of unilaterally expanding their 'fiscal' horizons.
African AE

Johannesburg, South Africa

#585 Nov 22, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
I want linked data to prove the erroneous title of this thread
"NEANDERTHALS made WHITES more INTELLIGENT"....you SUPPORTER OF racism against Ethiopian JEWS AND OTHER Africans.
WHAT?????you are an EXTREME RACIST WHO HATES ASHKENAZI JEWS THE REAL JEWS OF ISRAEL IN THEIR RIGHTFUL HOME OF ISRAEL! Ethiopian Jews like all other black Africans are nothing BUT CONVERTS!

Level 6

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#586 Nov 23, 2013
Ish Tov wrote:
<quoted text>
You know nothing about reality, boy.
Neandertals could speak. They had language. This is proven. You are too ignorant to know of the discovery of neandertalensis hyoid bones, nor do you know what that is in any case, boy.
I didn't say they couldn't talk. I said that they couldn't talk in the same way as we[purely human] Africans can.

NEANDERTHALS LACKED SOCIAL SKILLS

"The research team explored the idea that the ancestor of Neanderthals left Africa and had to adapt to the longer, darker nights and murkier days of Europe. The result was that Neanderthals evolved larger eyes and a much larger visual processing area at the backs of their brains.

The humans that stayed in Africa, on the other hand, continued to enjoy bright and beautiful days and so had no need for such an adaption. Instead, these people, our ancestors, evolved their frontal lobes, associated with higher-level thinking, before they spread across the globe."

Eiluned Pearce of Oxford University decided to check this theory. She compared the skulls of 32 Homo sapiens and 13 Neanderthals.

"Since Neanderthals evolved at higher latitudes, more of the Neanderthal brain would have been dedicated to vision and body control, leaving less brain to deal with other functions like social networking," she told BBC News.

[That's why peoples like the British are so reserved, antisocial, cold and individualist]

"We infer that Neanderthals had a smaller cognitive part of the brain and this would have limited them, including their ability to form larger groups. If you live in a larger group, you need a larger brain in order to process all those extra relationships," he explained.

Oxford University's Prof Robin Dunbar, said that "They were very, very smart, but not quite in the same league as Homo sapiens," he told BBC News.

BBC

Ish Tov
Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#587 Nov 23, 2013
Darkjaemess wrote:
<quoted text>
I didn't say they couldn't talk. I said that they couldn't talk in the same way as we[purely human] Africans can.
NEANDERTHALS LACKED SOCIAL SKILLS
"The research team explored the idea that the ancestor of Neanderthals left Africa and had to adapt to the longer, darker nights and murkier days of Europe. The result was that Neanderthals evolved larger eyes and a much larger visual processing area at the backs of their brains.
The humans that stayed in Africa, on the other hand, continued to enjoy bright and beautiful days and so had no need for such an adaption. Instead, these people, our ancestors, evolved their frontal lobes, associated with higher-level thinking, before they spread across the globe."
Eiluned Pearce of Oxford University decided to check this theory. She compared the skulls of 32 Homo sapiens and 13 Neanderthals.
"Since Neanderthals evolved at higher latitudes, more of the Neanderthal brain would have been dedicated to vision and body control, leaving less brain to deal with other functions like social networking," she told BBC News.
[That's why peoples like the British are so reserved, antisocial, cold and individualist]
"We infer that Neanderthals had a smaller cognitive part of the brain and this would have limited them, including their ability to form larger groups. If you live in a larger group, you need a larger brain in order to process all those extra relationships," he explained.
Oxford University's Prof Robin Dunbar, said that "They were very, very smart, but not quite in the same league as Homo sapiens," he told BBC News.
BBC
They had language. That is the point, fool. You were attempting to make them look like grunting idiots. You thereby describe yourself.

Neandertalensis ancestors left Africa? As Homo erectus! Long before!
Heidelbergensis evolved from erectus, and probably across their range, which included much of Eurasia including Europe. And the neandertalensis evolved from western Eurasian heidelbergensis. So where do you get the notion that they migrated from Africa?
Baboons live in very large groups...
You're babbling as usual, Moslem scum.
No doubt your intent is to cast aspersions on Europeans based on the characteritics of neandertalensis. Yet you ignore that YOU have more heidelbergensis admixture than Europeans have neandertalensis.

Discuss that, boy.

“No Substitute For The Truth”

Level 8

Since: Jan 10

Orlando, FL

#588 Nov 23, 2013
Ish Tov wrote:
<quoted text>
Their characteristics are similar to those of heidelbergensis, who existed since 800,000 years ago, AND neandertalensis itself persisted for over 400,000 years. Yes, that is NORMAL.
The fossils of H. erectus, heidelbergensis, and neandertalensis all show clearly that they are in an evolutionary sequence, with known transitional forms, as there is also evidence for transition of heidelbergensis to sapiens.
How refreshing that instead of pushing Afronazism per se, you're instead pushing something just as idiotic: CREATIONISM!!! LOL!!!
I am NOT convinced. I have NOT read any article stating Neanderthals had a normal development. I've read articles stating their development was different BUT NOT normal. Difference can either be normal or abnormal. For example: Big and small eyes are normal while bulging eyes are abnormal.

“No Substitute For The Truth”

Level 8

Since: Jan 10

Orlando, FL

#589 Nov 23, 2013
Curious Me wrote:
<quoted text>
HEY, RÉTARD, you forgot to prove that H.Neanderthal HAD any sort of "pathological condition" that I might actually have to explain, in the first place, FÓÓL.
So far, you've only presented 2 articles that spoke of H.Neanderthal.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national...
http://www.tgdaily.com/general-sciences-featu...
Neither one attempted to prove that H.Neanderthal had any sort of the "pathological condition of which you spoke,
and in fact, the 1st one, actually supplied a reference proving that no such "pathological condition" existed for them.
"...key skeletal traits common in cretins are not found in Neanderthals, and that a single pathology cannot explain the extinction of an entire population that had survived in a hostile environment for thousands of years.
"It's an unfortunate case of people outside the field talking about something they don't know anything about," Erik Trinkaus of Washington University in St. Louis, one of the country's leading authorities on Neanderthals, said in an interview. "Cretinism leaves very distinctive marks on skeletons, and they're not there on Neanderthals.""
Scientists themselves have different beliefs. Just because one scientists disagrees doesn't mean his beliefs are TRUTH. What will end this debate is an article stating Neanderthals had a normal development. This would indicate their environment had little too no adverse effect on them thus no Pathological illness.

“No Substitute For The Truth”

Level 8

Since: Jan 10

Orlando, FL

#590 Nov 23, 2013
Ish Tov wrote:
<quoted text>
They had language. That is the point, fool. You were attempting to make them look like grunting idiots. You thereby describe yourself.
Neandertalensis ancestors left Africa? As Homo erectus! Long before!
Heidelbergensis evolved from erectus, and probably across their range, which included much of Eurasia including Europe. And the neandertalensis evolved from western Eurasian heidelbergensis. So where do you get the notion that they migrated from Africa?
Baboons live in very large groups...
You're babbling as usual, Moslem scum.
No doubt your intent is to cast aspersions on Europeans based on the characteritics of neandertalensis. Yet you ignore that YOU have more heidelbergensis admixture than Europeans have neandertalensis.
Discuss that, boy.
Both Neanderthals & Homo Sapiens evolved from the same ancestor Heidelbergensis. By lookin' at how Sapiens developed, it's quite obvious their environment was MORE ideal than Neanderthals environment which was a lot less greener and sunnier. This is something you guys have rough time comprehending. You believe Humans develop better in a environment similar to Neanderthals.
trollslayer

Lansing, IL

#591 Nov 23, 2013
Redefined wrote:
<quoted text>
I am NOT convinced. I have NOT read any article stating Neanderthals had a normal development. I've read articles stating their development was different BUT NOT normal. Difference can either be normal or abnormal. For example: Big and small eyes are normal while bulging eyes are abnormal.
"barros" is a racist idiot who will never bring forth legitimate LINKED evidence.
fex

Escondido, CA

#592 Dec 2, 2013
I'm a rare monkey
I'm a rare monkey
Hom-in-id
Predates a squid!

I'm a rare monkey
I'm a rare monkey
Abor-i-gine
Eatin' a wall-a-by.
Mmmm, mmmm, mmmm!

Nean-der-thal
Drawin' on a wall
It's my new pastime
Chalk and lime!

Cro Magnon just ain't me
New immigrant, that be he.
So now it's to the sea!

I'm a rare monkey
I'm a rare monkey
Watchin' Denisovans float on by
As I paddle to Ur-u-guay
!Si si si!

!Buenos dias, senora hominid!
Bet you wish I did,
'Cuz I was here before
The Aleutians were your backdoor,
So you can plainly see
That I will always be...

I'm a rare monkey
I'm a rare monkey

(fade to oblivion)
African AE

Randburg, South Africa

#593 Dec 2, 2013
Neanderthals were human beings who looked slightly different to modern Europeans! Would a person really be able to tell the difference between a modern European and neanderthal? Probably not!
Neanderthal looking just like Chuck Norris:
www.zgeek.com/chuck-norris-neanderthal/

Level 6

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#594 Dec 2, 2013
Ish Tov wrote:
<quoted text>
They had language. That is the point, fool.
I didn't say they couldn't talk. I said that they couldn't talk in the same way as we[purely human] Africans can.

NEANDERTHALS LACKED SOCIAL SKILLS

"The research team explored the idea that the ancestor of Neanderthals left Africa and had to adapt to the longer, darker nights and murkier days of Europe. The result was that Neanderthals evolved larger eyes and a much larger visual processing area at the backs of their brains.

The humans that stayed in Africa, on the other hand, continued to enjoy bright and beautiful days and so had no need for such an adaption. Instead, these people, our ancestors, evolved their frontal lobes, associated with higher-level thinking, before they spread across the globe."

Eiluned Pearce of Oxford University decided to check this theory. She compared the skulls of 32 Homo sapiens and 13 Neanderthals.

"Since Neanderthals evolved at higher latitudes, more of the Neanderthal brain would have been dedicated to vision and body control, leaving less brain to deal with other functions like social networking," she told BBC News.

[That's why peoples like the British are so reserved, antisocial, cold and individualist]

"We infer that Neanderthals had a smaller cognitive part of the brain and this would have limited them, including their ability to form larger groups. If you live in a larger group, you need a larger brain in order to process all those extra relationships," he explained.

Oxford University's Prof Robin Dunbar, said that "They were very, very smart, but not quite in the same league as Homo sapiens," he told BBC News.

BBC
African AE

Cape Town, South Africa

#595 Dec 3, 2013
Darkjaemess wrote:
<quoted text>
I didn't say they couldn't talk. I said that they couldn't talk in the same way as we[purely human] Africans can.
NEANDERTHALS LACKED SOCIAL SKILLS
"The research team explored the idea that the ancestor of Neanderthals left Africa and had to adapt to the longer, darker nights and murkier days of Europe. The result was that Neanderthals evolved larger eyes and a much larger visual processing area at the backs of their brains.
The humans that stayed in Africa, on the other hand, continued to enjoy bright and beautiful days and so had no need for such an adaption. Instead, these people, our ancestors, evolved their frontal lobes, associated with higher-level thinking, before they spread across the globe."
Eiluned Pearce of Oxford University decided to check this theory. She compared the skulls of 32 Homo sapiens and 13 Neanderthals.
"Since Neanderthals evolved at higher latitudes, more of the Neanderthal brain would have been dedicated to vision and body control, leaving less brain to deal with other functions like social networking," she told BBC News.
[That's why peoples like the British are so reserved, antisocial, cold and individualist]
"We infer that Neanderthals had a smaller cognitive part of the brain and this would have limited them, including their ability to form larger groups. If you live in a larger group, you need a larger brain in order to process all those extra relationships," he explained.
Oxford University's Prof Robin Dunbar, said that "They were very, very smart, but not quite in the same league as Homo sapiens," he told BBC News.
BBC
Neanderthals were almost EXACTLY like modern Europeans!
Latest link on NEANDERTHALS:
www.i09.com/5862448/admit-it-+-you-totally-wo...
Europeans get their blonde,red hair blue eyes,green eyes and light skin from the neanderthal. DNA taken from the European neanderthal shows they were light skinned with different colour hair and eyes!
whites bullshyt

United States

#596 Dec 3, 2013
i think black people made white people smart

Ish Tov
Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#597 Dec 3, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
"barros" is a racist idiot who will never bring forth legitimate LINKED evidence.
You're a racist liar, boy, talking racist crap in here you can't back up, ignoring all real evidence, and behaving like a cultist.

Evidence has been posted in here for everything I've said, boy.

Why don't you come and try lying in person and see what happens to you. I REALLY hate racists and love to hurt them.

Level 6

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#598 Dec 3, 2013
Ish Tov wrote:
<quoted text>
You're a racist liar, boy, talking racist crap in here you can't back up, ignoring all real evidence, and behaving like a cultist.
Evidence has been posted in here for everything I've said, boy.
Why don't you come and try lying in person and see what happens to you. I REALLY hate racists and love to hurt them.
"Accuse them of what you are, blame them for what you do." ~ Vladmir Lenin

Ish Tov
Level 3

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#599 Dec 3, 2013
Darkjaemess wrote:
<quoted text>
"Accuse them of what you are, blame them for what you do." ~ Vladmir Lenin
Lie and prevaricate to get your way---Mohambone

“DANGER!!”

Level 8

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#600 Dec 3, 2013
trollslayer wrote:
<quoted text>
"barros" is a racist idiot who will never bring forth legitimate LINKED evidence.
HE HAS, and when he doesn't then I DO.

Every thing that he has presented or stated is ABSOLUTELY LEGITIMATE and I have regularly submitted UNASSAILABLE LEGITIMATE REFERENCES TO WHATEVER HE MIGHT HAVE NOT FELT THE NEED TO SUBSTANTIATE.

(((YOU NEVER HAVE)))

YOU CHEEKY LYING BÁSTARD SÇÚM BÁG.

“DANGER!!”

Level 8

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#601 Dec 3, 2013
Redefined wrote:
<quoted text>
Scientists themselves have different beliefs. Just because one scientists disagrees doesn't mean his beliefs are TRUTH. What will end this debate is an article stating Neanderthals had a normal development. This would indicate their environment had little too no adverse effect on them thus no Pathological illness.
NO, YOU LAME ÁSS TWIT,

there has been ABSOLUTELY NO DISAGREEMENT AMONGST LEGITIMATELY (((QUALIFIED))) SCIENTISTS on the subject of which you FOOLISHLY are harping, FÓÓL.

There was ONLY gerographer "GEROME E. DOBSON" who published the statement by which YOU WISH we were so impressed.

A GEOGRAPHER IS NOT QUALIFIED to make contrary statements that are strictly within the purview of the LEGITIMATE ANTHROPOLOGICAL SCIENTISTS that TRULY ARE the focused QUALIFIED scholarly experts within that specific field of endeavor.

•••

Just as the very same article which you ignorantly believed was supporting YOUR very failed notions had stated:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national...

""It's an unfortunate case of people outside the field talking about something they don't know anything about," Erik Trinkaus of Washington University in St. Louis, one of the country's leading authorities on Neanderthals, said in an interview. "Cretinism leaves very distinctive marks on skeletons, and they're not there on Neanderthals."

•••

...just one more unassailable article proving that
YOU ARE AN IGNORANT ÁSS.
Maria OConnor

Perris, CA

#603 Dec 14, 2013
Whites are not the only people, with neanderthal genes. We are all part neanderthal, except a minority of people: South Saharan Africans, because, northern Africans, just like Ethiopian and others have neanderthal genes. In addition, South Saharan Africa, is receiving emigration from India, China, and Europeans countries.
Beer Belly Bobs Ghost

New York, NY

#604 Dec 14, 2013
Ish Tov wrote:
<quoted text>
Lie and prevaricate to get your way---Mohambone
YOU DID IT!!! 3000 posts in 3 months. I knew you would. On the one hand I feel like I called it, yup, I was right. On the other hand...what a fckin loser you are smh.

Maybe I'll start a thread about black Olmecs or something. I know I'd get countless bumps from you on it...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min No Surprize 1,763,044
Solution to unjustified police shootings of una... 4 min Redefined 51
What Did African Americans Contribute To America? 6 min BillyDbigballer 182
News Black candidate makes history as women advance ... 9 min T-BOS 68
If we got rid of the Negroes what would America... 16 min Firey Fellow 44 73
A threesome with Ms Mack and Lori 21 min Ttt 20
They call us cave Beasts 22 min Blacks are inferior 9
Does Kip's bottom lip "ebonically" bar him from... 1 hr Firey Fellow 44 26
How come white ppl had so many diseases 1 hr Firey Fellow 44 43
I need proof that the Ancient Egyptians Were No... (Oct '07) 3 hr dreamhunk 40,833