NEANDERTHALS made WHITES more INTELLI...
Drescher

Germany

#26 Apr 28, 2013
Birdfecesdippedindoghair wrote:
If whites are so smart why is europe in a recession?
Because we send too much of our money to non Neanderthal DNA types in Africa so they don't starve.
Birdfecesdippedi ndoghair

Paterson, NJ

#27 Apr 28, 2013
Crackers always have an excuse when their cave logic gets flipped on them.
Drescher

Germany

#28 Apr 28, 2013
The Ten Most Educated and Smartest Countries
with peoples of Neanderthal decent.

Finland
Australia
United Kingdom
Norway
South Korea
New Zealand
United States
Japan
Israel
Canada

Non-Neanderthal DNA Countries with average IQ less than 68

Angola
Burkina Faso
Chad
Djibouti
Somalia
Swaziland
Dominica
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Haiti
Lesotho
Liberia
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Sao Tome and Principe
Gambia, The
Cameroon
Gabon
Mozambique
Saint Lucia
Equatorial Guinea

“Busting trolls is my hobby.”

Level 1

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#29 Apr 28, 2013
Interesting theory, but where's the proof?
Birdfecesdippedi ndoghair

Paterson, NJ

#30 Apr 28, 2013
So they gave all those african countries Iq tests? Interesting, seeing how it didnt happen.
Drescher wrote:
The Ten Most Educated and Smartest Countries
with peoples of Neanderthal decent.
Finland
Australia
United Kingdom
Norway
South Korea
New Zealand
United States
Japan
Israel
Canada
Non-Neanderthal DNA Countries with average IQ less than 68
Angola
Burkina Faso
Chad
Djibouti
Somalia
Swaziland
Dominica
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Haiti
Lesotho
Liberia
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Sao Tome and Principe
Gambia, The
Cameroon
Gabon
Mozambique
Saint Lucia
Equatorial Guinea
D Davis MD

Los Angeles, CA

#31 Apr 28, 2013
Drescher wrote:
The Ten Most Educated and Smartest Countries
with peoples of Neanderthal decent.
Finland
Australia
United Kingdom
Norway
South Korea
New Zealand
United States
Japan
Israel
Canada
Non-Neanderthal DNA Countries with average IQ less than 68
Angola
Burkina Faso
Chad
Djibouti
Somalia
Swaziland
Dominica
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Haiti
Lesotho
Liberia
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Sao Tome and Principe
Gambia, The
Cameroon
Gabon
Mozambique
Saint Lucia
Equatorial Guinea
Exactly! The one deciding factor that separates the intelligent from the not so intelligent, is the presence of Neanderthal DNA.

This is not a localized theory, but a world wide fact as you have shown.

If one were to, for example, take a closer look at each individual state in the United states, one would find the that the most intelligent people will live in the states with the highest percentage of peoples with Neanderthal DNA.

If we took it a step further and took a closer look at each individual city in a given state, we would come to the same conclusion. We could even go as far to look at each individual neighborhood and the outcome would still hold true.

Neanderthal DNA is the driving factor behind intelligence.

Those fortunate enough to have Neanderthal Man as an ancestor are undoubtedly more intelligent than those without.
D Davis MD

Los Angeles, CA

#32 Apr 28, 2013
Birdfecesdippedindoghair wrote:
So they gave all those african countries Iq tests? Interesting, seeing how it didnt happen.
<quoted text>
No, son. They did not give the countries IQ tests. They gave IQ tests to a random sampling of people in each of those countries.
Hope that helps.

Birdfecesdippedi ndoghair

Paterson, NJ

#33 Apr 28, 2013
D Davis MD wrote:
<quoted text>
No, son. They did not give the countries IQ tests. They gave IQ tests to a random sampling of people in each of those countries.
Hope that helps.
It does help. It basically tells me his stats are faulty since they didnt test everyone.
D Davis MD

Los Angeles, CA

#34 Apr 28, 2013
Birdfecesdippedindoghair wrote:
<quoted text>
It does help. It basically tells me his stats are faulty since they didnt test everyone.
Glad I helped you. Never be ashamed to ask for help when you don't know the answer. This is how we learn.

One of the best ways to achieve unbiased results in a study is through random sampling. Random sampling includes choosing subjects from a population through unpredictable means. In its simplest form, subjects all have an equal chance of being selected out of the population being researched.
When surveying a large population it may not make sense to survey everyone in the population, as this would be very time consuming and often quite expensive. Random sampling in this case would be proportionate to the size of the population, and the results from surveying the samples would be later used to infer how the population as a whole may have responded and to draw conclusions about the larger group.
Birdfecesdippedi ndoghair

Paterson, NJ

#35 Apr 28, 2013
D Davis MD wrote:
<quoted text>
Glad I helped you. Never be ashamed to ask for help when you don't know the answer. This is how we learn.
One of the best ways to achieve unbiased results in a study is through random sampling. Random sampling includes choosing subjects from a population through unpredictable means. In its simplest form, subjects all have an equal chance of being selected out of the population being researched.
When surveying a large population it may not make sense to survey everyone in the population, as this would be very time consuming and often quite expensive. Random sampling in this case would be proportionate to the size of the population, and the results from surveying the samples would be later used to infer how the population as a whole may have responded and to draw conclusions about the larger group.
Thing is your white iq test doesn't really measure intelligence since you idiots have no idea about the brain and how it works.

The human brain is the biggest mystery in this universe.

You idiots cant explain why we dream but you think you can measure intelligence.
Katana

Wan Chai, Hong Kong

#36 Apr 28, 2013
And Asians have higher IQs than gweilos.
D Davis MD

Los Angeles, CA

#37 Apr 28, 2013
A Lighter Shade of Pale wrote:
<quoted text>
The Australian Aborigines have too much Denisovan DNA. The Denisovans are a very distant relative of the Neanderthals. The Denisovan peoples were not as intelligent as the Neanderthal man.
You are correct.
D Davis MD

Los Angeles, CA

#38 Apr 28, 2013
Birdfecesdippedindoghair wrote:
<quoted text>
Thing is your white iq test doesn't really measure intelligence since you idiots have no idea about the brain and how it works.
The human brain is the biggest mystery in this universe.
You idiots cant explain why we dream but you think you can measure intelligence.
Your constant need to insult and your uncontrollable anger, shows you lack any level of formal education and had non caring parents in your home. Good day to you.
D Davis MD

Los Angeles, CA

#40 Apr 28, 2013
Katana wrote:
And Asians have higher IQs than gweilos.
That is a valid point. However the presence of Neanderthal DNA is not strictly confined to intelligence. I will expand on that thought.
We have scientific proof that Whites have the most Neanderthal DNA of all the races, Asians have less Neanderthal DNA than Whites and finally, Africans have the least or none at all.
Besides the intelligence that Neanderthal Man gave us, he also passed on through his DNA, the unrelenting need to explore and the inborn tendency to question everything. It is no small wonder that the race with the highest Neanderthal DNA has also evolved the furthest. This is proven by the evolution of whites from the Bronze age through the Space age to the Computer/information age.
Asians with less Neanderthal DNA than whites, never had the inborn desire to explore and are pretty much satisfied and secure on their little piece of real estate on Planet Earth. While whites are looking ahead to the colonization of distant planets. Africans are in the same boat as the Asians, but with no Neanderthal DNA they still haven't progressed to the point of having adequate sanitation, food, shelter or drinking water.

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#41 Apr 28, 2013
ESAD wrote:
<quoted text>
Isolation, the same as Amerindians, they had no interaction with other widespread groups of Neanderthal Sapiens, also, their environment was not the same as the original Neanderthals, so Neanderthal benefits would have culturally died out.
The narrow band of land where Neanderthals and their superior descendants lived is more challenging than Africa, America or Australia, those places didn't need as much environmental adaptation, Neanderthal intelligence wasn't needed.
Neanderthals had the first bows, arrows, projectile spears, huts, tents, clothing and 'religious' beliefs. They were not the dumb ape brutes all the Negroes today think they were, however, ALL Neanderthals were stronger than the strongest human alive today - whatever color.
Native Americans were isolated? They inhabited 2 huge continents, with plenty of people around, and they created numerous civilizations.

You don't know squat about denisova or heidelbergensis. Very likely they had large brains like neandertalensis by the time sapiens was interbreeding with them. We have no remains of denisova and none of heidelbergensis that late.

If neandertalensis evolved a larger brain, why would not have the other 2 as well? The trend among Homo was always toward larger brain. That process would not have continued in the ancestors of sapiens in Ethiopia, and in neandertalensis, but have stopped in heidelbergensis and denisova. No reason to assume that.
A Lighter Shade of Pale

Bristol, UK

#42 Apr 28, 2013
D Davis MD wrote:
<quoted text>
That is a valid point. However the presence of Neanderthal DNA is not strictly confined to intelligence. I will expand on that thought.
We have scientific proof that Whites have the most Neanderthal DNA of all the races, Asians have less Neanderthal DNA than Whites and finally, Africans have the least or none at all.
Besides the intelligence that Neanderthal Man gave us, he also passed on through his DNA, the unrelenting need to explore and the inborn tendency to question everything. It is no small wonder that the race with the highest Neanderthal DNA has also evolved the furthest. This is proven by the evolution of whites from the Bronze age through the Space age to the Computer/information age.
Asians with less Neanderthal DNA than whites, never had the inborn desire to explore and are pretty much satisfied and secure on their little piece of real estate on Planet Earth. While whites are looking ahead to the colonization of distant planets. Africans are in the same boat as the Asians, but with no Neanderthal DNA they still haven't progressed to the point of having adequate sanitation, food, shelter or drinking water.
Interesting theory. I've heard this mentioned before.
Jaxn77

United States

#44 Apr 28, 2013
D Davis MD wrote:
<quoted text>
That is a valid point. However the presence of Neanderthal DNA is not strictly confined to intelligence. I will expand on that thought.
We have scientific proof that Whites have the most Neanderthal DNA of all the races, Asians have less Neanderthal DNA than Whites and finally, Africans have the least or none at all.
Besides the intelligence that Neanderthal Man gave us, he also passed on through his DNA, the unrelenting need to explore and the inborn tendency to question everything. It is no small wonder that the race with the highest Neanderthal DNA has also evolved the furthest. This is proven by the evolution of whites from the Bronze age through the Space age to the Computer/information age.
Asians with less Neanderthal DNA than whites, never had the inborn desire to explore and are pretty much satisfied and secure on their little piece of real estate on Planet Earth. While whites are looking ahead to the colonization of distant planets. Africans are in the same boat as the Asians, but with no Neanderthal DNA they still haven't progressed to the point of having adequate sanitation, food, shelter or drinking water.
I work with a fairly even number of blacks and whites. Every time the subject of space exploration, or other federally funded science programs are mentioned, the majority of blacks overwhelmingly view these as a waste of taxpayer dollars. So yes, from my own personal experience, there is something fundamentally different about the way non neanderthal DNA people think.
gaha

Union City, NJ

#45 Apr 29, 2013
I find this topic of Neanderthal very interesting. Although, whites may have allegedly more Neanderthal DNA. The one thing people who argue color forget to mention is that white can not exist without black. Therefore, it is important to note that Neanderthal as per scientific research is said to be a tawny color. According to Noah Websters Dictionary 1828. The meaning of the word tawny is "of a yellowish dark color like things tanned or persons who are sun burnt as a tawny moor". The last I checked the moors are not Caucasian. They are of a darker hue. So one may attribute Caucasian intelligence to their Moorish legacy.

Caucasians as all hues which are not black were created most likely due to necessity, environment and diet. I agree that Neanderthal maybe responsible for material intelligence. But to say one group is more intelligent than another I think is limited thinking process. Just because a group has imposed it's mindset on another does not mean they are more intelligent. It just means they are more aggressive and persistent.

What we need to look at is not so much skin color but mindset. The mindset of a person speaks volumes to what genes he or she may have activated within their organism . There are a lot other factors but how one processes information is a great starting point to figuring it out.

Sinajuavi
Level 6

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#46 Apr 29, 2013
gaha wrote:
I find this topic of Neanderthal very interesting. Although, whites may have allegedly more Neanderthal DNA. The one thing people who argue color forget to mention is that white can not exist without black. Therefore, it is important to note that Neanderthal as per scientific research is said to be a tawny color. According to Noah Websters Dictionary 1828. The meaning of the word tawny is "of a yellowish dark color like things tanned or persons who are sun burnt as a tawny moor". The last I checked the moors are not Caucasian. They are of a darker hue. So one may attribute Caucasian intelligence to their Moorish legacy.
Caucasians as all hues which are not black were created most likely due to necessity, environment and diet. I agree that Neanderthal maybe responsible for material intelligence. But to say one group is more intelligent than another I think is limited thinking process. Just because a group has imposed it's mindset on another does not mean they are more intelligent. It just means they are more aggressive and persistent.
What we need to look at is not so much skin color but mindset. The mindset of a person speaks volumes to what genes he or she may have activated within their organism . There are a lot other factors but how one processes information is a great starting point to figuring it out.
That's a load of gibberish.

The Moors were mostly Berbers, who were of Mideastern, European, and black origin, as Berbers today, of Eurasian appearance.

“white cannot exist without black”= meaningless cliche used by Afronazis.

“created”??? No, EVOLVED!

I agree that it is absurd to claim greater intelligence for one human group over another.

However,“mindset” has nothing to do with genes. Culture is not genetically deternmined; it is learned.
D Davis MD

Los Angeles, CA

#47 Apr 29, 2013
sand-_cracker wrote:
<quoted text>Lol. The Japanese are more intelligent than you pink devils,
That is one person's subjective viewpoint. However if we calm down and look at this from an objective viewpoint, we will find that statement to be false and irrational. I assume your statement is based solely on written tests. Yes, as a whole Asians, which include the Japanese, fare better than Whites on written tests that measure intelligence. But is that the only measure of intelligence? If we measure intelligence on what the Japanese have contributed to the betterment or advancement of mankind beginning with the Stone Age to present day, vs what the white race has contributed, we will find that it is the whites who contributed the most, by a factor of 10.
So, are the Japanese really more "intelligent" because they score better on tests?
I would say no.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

African-American Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Another sprog falls victim to its mammy's head ... 3 min The Mythical Axe 6
Jax is gay!! Axe asked me to marry him and I sa... 11 min Dan Snow 7
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 14 min obama muslim 1,566,955
Microchips In Employees Become Reality 21 min Redefined 66
German Spooks Listen to Immigrants' Communicati... 21 min Gestapo 1
The Loudest Rednecks on Topix are Envious Dirt ... 24 min TRUMP HATES NEGROES 2
Western Sperm Counts Plummeting 37 min Gestapo 4
Can Blacks Be Impartial And Trusted Enough To ... 45 min The Delighted Axe 156
News Anti-racist author Tim Wise: White America desp... 1 hr californio 909
Do black men really have larger penises? (Sep '10) 1 hr Jarhead 1,549
New evidence of non human DNA found in black Af... 3 hr Prophets prophesy 60
More from around the web